Skip to main content
Yonago Acta Medica logoLink to Yonago Acta Medica
. 2021 Apr 15;64(2):168–175. doi: 10.33160/yam.2021.05.007

Clinical Significance of Serum Antithrombin III Activity After Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Naruo Tokuyasu *, Masataka Amisaki *, Takehiko Hanaki *, Yuki Murakami *, Masaki Morimoto *, Ei Uchinaka *, Takuki Yagyu *, Keisuke Goto *, Tomoyuki Matsunaga *, Manabu Yamamoto *, Shuichi Takano *, Teruhisa Sakamoto *, Soichiro Honjo *, Toshimichi Hasegawa *, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara *
PMCID: PMC8128657  PMID: 34025191

ABSTRACT

Background

As antithrombin III (AT-III) is produced in the hepatocytes, its serum activity decreases at the time of liver failure, in addition to ischemia reperfusion injury, vascular endothelial dysfunction, and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Here, we examined whether the serum AT-III value after hepatectomy could be a prognostic factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Of 141 patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC, data for 101 patients in whom serum AT-III activity was measured on the first postoperative day were extracted. Patients with serum AT-III activity > 50% and ≤ 50% were assigned to high value (72 cases) and low value (29 cases) groups, respectively. We examined the clinical and prognostic differences between these two groups.

Results

The average age of enrolled patients (83 men and 18 women) was 68.0 years. The 5-year overall survival rate was 88% and 60% in the high and low value groups, respectively (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the 2-year relapse-free survival rate was 71% and 54% in the high and low value groups, respectively (P = 0.03).

Conclusion

This is the first study to demonstrate that serum AT-III levels on the first postoperative day may serve as a prognostic factor in HCC patients.

Keywords: Antithrombin III, Hepatectomy, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Prognostic factor


Hepatic resection is considered a curative treatment for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).1 Advances in surgical modalities have improved the prognosis of HCC patients, but many patients show cancer recurrence after surgery. It is imperative to identify patients with high risk of recurrence and poor prognosis, as careful surveillance of the poor prognosis group may allow early detection of recurrent disease and immediate administration of treatment. Furthermore, some positive interventions such as adjuvant chemotherapy may be possible for the high-risk group for cancer recurrence in the future.

The prognostic factors after surgery for HCC are extensively studied. As indicated in the Japan Society of Hepatology–HCC Guidelines 2017, the major prognostic factors are tumor size, tumor number, vascular invasion, and liver function. Furthermore, the guidelines state that the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and sarcopenia are also prognostic factors after hepatectomy.2 Taken together, various factors such as tumor stage, liver function, inflammation, immunity, and nutrition are involved as prognostic factors.

Further, cancer and coagulation are known to be closely related. For example, the presence of malignant tumors is a possible cause of thrombotic tendency.3 The hemostatic mechanism of blood is maintained by balance between coagulation and activities of fibrinolysis factors in the blood. Among them, antithrombin III (AT-III) accounts for about 80% of the thrombin inactivation in the blood, and is also known to inactivate other coagulation factors (FX IIa, FX Ia, FIXa, FXa), plasmin, and kallikrein.4 AT-III is synthesized in the liver, and its levels are reduced in disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).5,6,7,8,9 Moreover, end-stage malignancies, severe infection, liver failure, ischemia reperfusion injury,10, 11 and vascular endothelial dysfunction decrease the activity of AT-III.

However, whether levels of AT-III post-surgery correlate with prognosis remained to be studied. This study aimed to determine the clinical and prognostic significance of serum AT-III values in patients who underwent hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

We examined the medical records of consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection for HCC at the Tottori University Hospital between 2004 and 2013. A total of 211 patients with histologically diagnosed HCC underwent hepatectomy, and 141 patients underwent initial and curative hepatectomy. All patients were diagnosed based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or Gd ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We excluded patients diagnosed with: 1) intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma tumors based on the histological findings of the resected specimens; 2) extrahepatic lesions, preoperative vascular invasion, positive surgical margins, or macroscopic residual tumor; and 3) underwent liver transplantation or surgical resection combined with ablation therapy. Operative indications included following factors: performance status < 3, preserved liver function estimated by both indocyanine green test and volumetric CT, and good general condition without serious organ failure. Non-anatomical hepatectomy was performed in patients with insufficient volume of remnant liver or those with tumors located peripherally. Intraoperative temporary inflow clump and transfusion were performed on demand from the operator and anesthesiologists in charge, respectively. Finally, a total of 101 patients were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into two groups based on their postoperative (day 1) AT-III activity as: High AT-III (> 50%, n = 72) and Low AT-III (≤ 50%, n = 29) group (Fig. 1). A cutoff value of 50% was obtained based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for overall mortality.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

 Patient inclusion, flow chart demonstrating patient inclusion.

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to surgery. Medical records were reviewed retrospectively after approval by the Institutional Review Board of the Tottori University Faculty of Medicine in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments (1606A029).

Variables

The data included patient characteristics [age, sex, body mass index (BMI), cause of hepatitis, Child-Pugh score, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score], tumor characteristics [number of tumors, maximum tumor diameter, and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level], intraoperative data (extent of resection, usage of intermittent total hepatic inflow occlusion, duration of surgery, intraoperative hemorrhage volume, and amount of intraoperative blood transfusion), and tumor pathological findings [capsule formation, microscopic vascular invasion, tumor differentiation, and stage of fibrosis of non-tumor-bearing liver according to the hepatitis activity index (HAI)].12 Patients were followed up every 3–6 months with liver function tests, tumor marker measurements, and imaging examination with CT and/or MRI. Data for disease recurrence and survival duration were collected from our patients’ database. Major resection was defined as surgery that included more than two Couinaud segments. Tumor recurrence was diagnosed based on the findings of either CT or MRI that was routinely performed every 6 months. Extrahepatic recurrence was defined as recurrence that included only extrahepatic metastasis without intrahepatic recurrence. Early phase recurrence was defined as recurrence diagnosed within two years after the operation, and late phase recurrence was defined as recurrence diagnosed more than two years after the operation.

Statistical analysis

The primary endpoint of this study was overall survival rate, and the secondary endpoints were disease-free survival rate and early phase recurrence rate in the high AT-III and low AT-III groups. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Predictive factors of overall survival and early recurrence were investigated using multivariate analysis based on the variables selected by each univariate analysis using a logistic regression model and Cox proportional hazards regression model, respectively. All continuous values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test (when less than five variables) for categorical variables. Welch’s two-sample t-test was used for continuous variables. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. R software version 3.1.3. (www.r-project.org/) was used for comparative statistical analysis. The optimal cutoff values of AT-III for survival and recurrence were determined by ROC curve analysis. A cutoff value for overall mortality was 50% of AT-III with a sensitivity and specificity of 42% and 77%, respectively. An AT-III activity of 50% was considered as the cutoff level in this study.

RESULTS

Postoperative AT-III and patient characteristics

The mean follow-up period of the 101 HCC patients enrolled in this study was 65.1 months. Table 1 summarizes patients’ clinicopathological characteristics, and operative and postoperative data in the low AT-III and high AT-III groups. AT-III activity significantly correlated with Child-Pugh score, MELD score, tumor number, and TNM stage. However, AT-III activity showed no correlation with operative factors, such as hepatic resection type, blood loss, operating time, pringle maneuver, and blood transfusion.

Table 1.  Comparison of clinicopathological features between the low AT-III and high AT-III groups.

Low AT-III (n = 29) High AT-III (n = 72) P
Demographic data
 Age (yr) ≥ 75 / < 75 9/20 26/46 0.80
 Gender Male / Female 21/8 63/9 0.12
 BMI (kg/m2) ≥ 25 / < 25 6/23 20/52 0.63
 Cause of hepatitis HBV / HCV 9/11 18/30 0.84
 Child-Pugh grade A/ ≥ B 3/26 1/71 0.07
 MELD score ≥ 10/ < 10 6/23 4/68 0.03*
 AFP value (IU/L) ≥ 20/ < 20 12/17 24/48 0.59
Operative data
 Extent of hepatic resection
Non-anatomical 15/14 27/45 0.28
Major resection 8/21 21/51 1.00
 Blood loss (mL) ≥ 500/ < 500 13/14 29/34 0.25
 Blood transfusion Yes 9 17 0.63
 Pringle maneuver Yes 18 44 1.00
Pathological data
 Tumor number Mt/St 12/17 10/62 < 0.01**
 Tumor size (cm) ≥ 5 / < 5 9/20 16/56 0.50
 Vascular invasion Yes 12/17 21/51 0.34
 TNM stage ≥ II / IA, IB 19/10 30/42 0.05
 Liver cirrhosis (HAI = IV) Yes 11/18 22/50 0.63

*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; BMI, body mass index; HAI, hepatitis activity index; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; MELD score, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score; Mt, multiple tumor; St, solitary tumor; TNM, tumor (T) nodes (N) and metastases (M); yr, year(s).

Overall survival and relapse-free survival analysis

Figure 2 shows the prognosis of patients with HCC after surgery. Patients in the low AT-III group showed significantly poor overall survival than those in high AT-III group. Moreover, multivariate analysis identified AT-III activity as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in addition to AFP, tumor number, and vascular invasion (Table 2). The overall relapse-free survival between the low AT-III and high AT-III groups tended to be different, although they were not significant (Fig. 3). Among the fatal cases, HCC-related deaths were 50.0% in the high AT-III group and 61.5% in the low AT-III group. On the other hand, death from hepatic failure was 18.1% in the high AT-III group and not in the low AT-III group.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

 Overall survival curves of the low AT-III and high AT-III groups. Patients in the low AT-III group showed significantly poor overall survival than those in high AT-III group (P < 0.01).

Table 2.  Univariate and multivariate analysis for overall survival.

Univariate Multivariate
P HR 95% CI P
Child-Pugh ≥ B < 0.01 2.2 0.6–7.9 0.24
AFP ≥ 20 IU/L < 0.01 2.7 1.3–5.8 < 0.01**
Blood transfusion Yes < 0.01 1.4 0.6–3.3 0.42
Tumor number Multiple 0.07 3.9 1.3–12.0 0.02*
Vascular invasion Yes < 0.01 4.1 1.1–14.8 0.03*
TNM stage ≥ II 0.04 0.3 0.1–1.5 0.14
AT-III Low < 0.01 2.6 1.1–6.0 0.03*

*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; AT-III, antithrombin III; CI, cumulative index; HR, hazards ratio; TNM, tumor (T) nodes (N) and metastases (M).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

 Recurrence-free survival curves of the low AT-III and high AT-III groups. Between the low AT-III and high AT-III groups tended to be different, although they were not significant (P = 0.36).

Risk factors contributing to early phase recurrence

Of 59 patients (58%) who developed HCC recurrence after curative resection, early phase recurrence (within two years after surgery) was observed in 35 patients (59%). Cox regression analysis identified four variables as risk factors contributing to early phase recurrence: serum AFP level, multiple tumors, and histological type. The low AT-III group showed a significantly higher recurrence rate than that in high AT-III group (Fig. 4). Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that low AT-III level is an independent risk factor for early phase recurrence (Table 3).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

 Recurrence-free survival curves of the low AT-III and high AT-III groups within 2 years after surgery. The low AT-III group showed a significantly higher recurrence rate than that in high AT-III group (P = 0.03).

Table 3.  Univariate and multivariate analysis for early recurrence.

Univariate Multivariate
P HR 95% CI P
AFP ≥ 20 IU/L < 0.01 3.6 1.7–7.6 < 0.01**
Blood transfusion Yes < 0.01 1.7 0.8–3.8 0.2
Tumor number Multiple < 0.01 4.0 1.4–11.4 < 0.01**
Vascular invasion Yes < 0.01 3.0 1.1–8.9 0.04*
TNM stage ≥ II < 0.01 0.6 0.2–2.0 0.38
AT-III Low 0.03 2.2 1.0–4.9 0.04*

*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. AFP, alpha fetoprotein; AT-III antithrombin III; CI, cumulative index; HR, hazards ratio; TNM, tumor (T) nodes (N) and metastases (M).

DISCUSSION

This study investigated the prognostic significance of the serum AT-III levels on the first day after hepatectomy for primary liver cancer. The results suggested that low AT-III activity on day 1 was a useful predictive factor for poor prognosis and early recurrence.

Low AT-III activity is reported to promote progression in several cancers, including those originating in the colon, lung, prostate, and ovary.13, 14 Additionally, a previous association study, based on propensity scores and multivariate analysis, showed that preoperative low AT-III levels may be a risk factor for tumor recurrence and prognosis in patients with HCC.15 It has been reported that the β-phase half-life of AT-III is reduced to 52.7 hours for cirrhosis and dramatically reduced to 23.9 hours for liver cancer compared to the normal 58.6 hours.16 Therefore, AT-III is prone to change, especially after liver cancer treatment.

In this study, we focused on postoperative, but not preoperative, AT-III activity. AT-III is a marker reflecting liver function, ischemia reperfusion, vascular endothelial dysfunction, DIC, sepsis, and so on.6, 17 As postoperative AT-III activity is associated with multiple factors, including preoperative, operative and postoperative indicators, we hypothesized that AT-III activity might associate with prognosis of HCC patients. We focused on AT-III levels on postoperative day-1, as AT-III activity on the first day was affected by surgical and infectious invasion, which might indicate cancer prognosis.18,19,20 Pereyra D et al. shows that AT-III activity on POD1 significantly predicted postoperative liver dysfunction in patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal cancer patients with liver metastasis.21

Postoperative complications are known to adversely affect oncological outcomes in various cancers.22, 23 In case of HCC, postoperative complications were an independent prognostic factor for early phase recurrence.24 In other words early phase postoperative status may affect cancer prognosis. The duration from surgery to the appearance of secondary tumors has been recognized as an indicator to distinguish intrahepatic metastasis from de novo tumors. Liver tumors developing within two years after surgery are believed to be intrahepatic metastases.25 This study also examined the impact of postoperative status, including AT-III, on intrahepatic metastases for HCC.

AT exerts anticoagulant action by binding to thrombin and other coagulation factors. Additionally, AT exerts direct anti-inflammatory and glycocalyx protecting actions of the vascular endothelium that controls vascular permeability.26 Iwako et al. reported that inadequate levels of AT-III increase the susceptibility of AT-insufficient mice to liver tumorigenesis via increased inflammation.27 Recent studies have shown that AT-III can suppress the proliferation and migration of HCC cells by inhibiting thrombin-induced tumor growth and angiogenesis.28,29,30,31,32 However, further basic and clinical studies are required to determine the antitumor mechanisms of AT-III.

This study has some limitations. First, the study was retrospective in design, meaning that there were missing values for several variables. Second, the sample size may have affected the statistical robustness of the results to certain extent. Third, as preoperative AT-III levels were not measured, we could not determine which was a more significant prognostic factor, pre- or post AT-III. Fourth, we did not assess the administration of antiviral drugs or interferon. In patients with hepatitis B-related HCC, adefovir antiviral therapy reduced late HCC recurrence and significantly improved overall survival after R0 hepatic resection.33 Finally, this was a single-institution cohort study. Therefore, further studies would be required to validate our results. Furthermore, the study on the clinical significance of AT administration for HCC surgery is another topic for future research.

In conclusion, this is the first study to demonstrate that serum AT-III levels on the first postoperative day may serve as a prognostic factor in HCC patients. Additionally, low AT-III activity can also serve as a predictive marker for early recurrence after HCC surgery. These results demonstrate that close observation and intense treatment may be required for HCC patients with low AT-III levels after hepatectomy.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments: We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.European Association For The Study Of The Liver; European Organisation For Research And Treatment Of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012;56:908-43. 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Japan Society of Hepatology. Clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma (2013 version). Tokyo: Kanehara; 2013. 223 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Khorana AA. Venous thromboembolism and prognosis in cancer. Thromb Res. 2010;125:490-3. 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.12.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hepner M,Karlaftis V. Antithrombin. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;992:355-64. 10.1007/978-1-62703-339-8_28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Asakura H. [DIC: state-of-the-art in diagnosis and management]. Rinsho Ketsueki. 2019;60:659-66. Japanese with English abstract. 10.11406/rinketsu.60.659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Morimatsu H,Wiedermann C,Tani M,Kanazawa T,Suzuki S,Matsusaki T,et al. Non-overt disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring for critically ill patients: the impact of antithrombin levels. Thromb Haemost. 2009;101:696-705. 10.1160/TH08-07-0448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yu M,Nardella A,Pechet L. Screening tests of disseminated intravascular coagulation: guidelines for rapid and specific laboratory diagnosis. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:1777-80. 10.1097/00003246-200006000-00013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Okabayashi K,Wada H,Ohta S,Shiku H,Nobori T,Maruyama K. Hemostatic markers and the sepsis-related organ failure assessment score in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation in an intensive care unit. Am J Hematol. 2004;76:225-9. 10.1002/ajh.20089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fourrier F,Chopin C,Goudemand J,Hendrycx S,Caron C,Rime A,et al. Septic shock, multiple organ failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Compared patterns of antithrombin III, protein C, and protein S deficiencies. Chest. 1992;101:816-23. 10.1378/chest.101.3.816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang F,Zhang G,Lu Z,Geurts AM,Usa K,Jacob HJ,et al. Antithrombin III/SerpinC1 insufficiency exacerbates renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 2015;88:796-803. 10.1038/ki.2015.176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rehberg S,Yamamoto Y,Sousse LE,Jonkam C,Zhu Y,Traber LD,et al. Antithrombin attenuates vascular leakage via inhibiting neutrophil activation in acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:e439-46. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318298ad3a [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Desmet VJ,Gerber M,Hoofnagle JH,Manns M,Scheuer PJ. Classification of chronic hepatitis: Diagnosis, grading and staging. Hepatology. 1994;19:1513-20. 10.1002/hep.1840190629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Büller HR,Boon TA,Henny CP,Dabhoiwala NF,ten Cate JW. Estrogen-induced deficiency and decrease in antithrombin III activity in patients with prostatic cancer. J Urol. 1982;128:72-4. 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)52762-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Honegger H,Anderson N,Hewitt LA,Tullis JL. Antithrombin III profiles in malignancy, relationship primary tumors and metastatic sites. Thromb Haemost. 1981;46:500-3. 10.1055/s-0038-1653396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Iwako H,Tashiro H,Amano H,Tanimoto Y,Oshita A,Kobayashi T,et al. Prognostic significance of antithrombin III levels for outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2888-96. 10.1245/s10434-012-2338-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Knot E,Ten Cate JW,Drijfhout HR,Kahlé LH,Tytgat GN. Antithrombin III metabolism in patients with liver disease. J Clin Pathol. 1984;37:523-30. 10.1136/jcp.37.5.523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Işık S,Tuncyurek P,Zengin NI,Demirbağ AE,Atalay F,Yılmaz S,et al. Antithrombin prevents apoptosis by regulating inflammation in the liver in a model of cold ischemia/warm reperfusion injury. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012;59:453-7. 10.5754/hge11317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dhainaut JF,Shorr AF,Macias WL,Kollef MJ,Levi M,Reinhart K,et al. Dynamic evolution of coagulopathy in the first day of severe sepsis: relationship with mortality and organ failure. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:341-8. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000153520.31562.48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lavrentieva A,Kontakiotis T,Bitzani M,Papaioannou-Gaki G,Parlapani A,Thomareis O,et al. Early coagulation disorders after severe burn injury: impact on mortality. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:700-6. 10.1007/s00134-007-0976-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gando S,Sawamura A,Hayakawa M,Hoshino H,Kubota N,Oshiro A. First day dynamic changes in antithrombin III activity after supplementation have a predictive value in critically ill patients. Am J Hematol. 2006;81:907-14. 10.1002/ajh.20696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pereyra D,Offensperger F,Klinglmueller F,Haegele S,Oehlberger L,Gruenberger T,et al. Early prediction of postoperative liver dysfunction and clinical outcome using antithrombin III-activity. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0175359. 10.1371/journal.pone.0175359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Law WL,Choi HK,Lee YM,Ho JWC. The impact of postoperative complications on long-term outcomes following curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2559-66. 10.1245/s10434-007-9434-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mavros MN,de Jong M,Dogeas E,Hyder O,Pawlik TM. Impact of complications on long-term survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2013;100:711-8. 10.1002/bjs.9060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Amisaki M,Saito H,Tokuyasu N,Sakamoto T,Honjo S,Fujiwara Y. Prognostic value of postoperative complication for early recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2018;17:323-9. 10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.03.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Imamura H,Matsuyama Y,Tanaka E,Ohkubo T,Hasegawa K,Miyagawa S,et al. Risk factors contributing to early and late phase intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. J Hepatol. 2003;38:200-7. 10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00360-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chappell D,Jacob M,Hofmann-Kiefer K,Rehm M,Welsch U,Conzen P,et al. Antithrombin reduces shedding of the endothelial glycocalyx following ischaemia/reperfusion. Cardiovasc Res. 2009;83:388-96. 10.1093/cvr/cvp097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Iwako H,Tashiro H,Okimoto S,Yamaguchi M,Abe T,Kuroda S,et al. Antithrombin insufficiency promotes susceptibility to liver tumorigenesis. J Surg Res. 2019;236:198-208. 10.1016/j.jss.2018.11.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hu L,Roth JM,Brooks P,Luty J,Karpatkin S. Thrombin up-regulates cathepsin D which enhances angiogenesis, growth, and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2008;68:4666-73. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hu L,Ibrahim S,Liu C,Skaar J,Pagano M,Karpatkin S. Thrombin induces tumor cell cycle activation and spontaneous growth by down-regulation of p27Kip1, in association with the up-regulation of Skp2 and MiR-222. Cancer Res. 2009;69:3374-81. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hu L,Roth JM,Brooks P,Ibrahim S,Karpatkin S. Twist is required for thrombin-induced tumor angiogenesis and growth. Cancer Res. 2008;68:4296-302. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kaufmann R,Rahn S,Pollrich K,Hertel J,Dittmar Y,Hommann M,et al. Thrombin-mediated hepatocellular carcinoma cell migration: cooperative action via proteinase-activated receptors 1 and 4. J Cell Physiol. 2007;211:699-707. 10.1002/jcp.21027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rullier A,Senant N,Kisiel W,Bioulac-Sage P,Balabaud C,Le Bail B,et al. Expression of protease-activated receptors and tissue factor in human liver. Virchows Arch. 2006;448:46-51. 10.1007/s00428-005-0078-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Huang G,Lau WY,Wang ZG,Pan ZY,Yuan SX,Shen F,et al. Antiviral therapy improves postoperative survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2015;261:56-66. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Yonago Acta Medica are provided here courtesy of Tottori University Medical Press

RESOURCES