Abstract
Despite the widespread observations on the osteogenic effects of magnesium ion (Mg2+), the diverse roles of Mg2+ during bone healing have not been systematically dissected. Here, we reveal a previously unknown, biphasic mode of action of Mg2+ in bone repair. During the early inflammation phase, Mg2+ contributes to an upregulated expression of transient receptor potential cation channel member 7 (TRPM7), and a TRPM7-dependent influx of Mg2+ in the monocyte-macrophage lineage, resulting in the cleavage and nuclear accumulation of TRPM7-cleaved kinase fragments (M7CKs). This then triggers the phosphorylation of Histone H3 at serine 10, in a TRPM7-dependent manner at the promoters of inflammatory cytokines, leading to the formation of a pro-osteogenic immune microenvironment. In the later remodeling phase, however, the continued exposure of Mg2+ not only lead to the over-activation of NF-κB signaling in macrophages and increased number of osteoclastic-like cells but also decelerates bone maturation through the suppression of hydroxyapatite precipitation. Thus, the negative effects of Mg2+ on osteogenesis can override the initial pro-osteogenic benefits of Mg2+. Taken together, this study establishes a paradigm shift in the understanding of the diverse and multifaceted roles of Mg2+ in bone healing.
Subject terms: Ion channel signalling, Osteoimmunology, Bone, Biomedical materials
Supplementation of magnesium (Mg2+) or its inclusion in biomaterials has beneficial effects for bone formation, but it has also been reported that it can have detrimental effects. Here, the authors analyse dose- and time-dependent effects of Mg2+ on bone regeneration and show that it can stimulate monocyte-macrophage lineage cells to support bone formation in the early phases of repair, but inhibit bone repair and mineralization in later stages by promoting a pro-inflammatory environment.
Introduction
Bone tissue has a substantial capacity for repair and regeneration after injury or surgical treatment. However, the natural healing of bone can be a slow process that often fails to restore the bone to its original strength and structure1. Thus, clinical interventions using orthopedic biomaterials are often required to accelerate bone healing while maintaining the amount and quality of bone mass. Magnesium ion (Mg2+) is integral to bone homeostasis and metabolism. Deficiency in Mg2+ is known to disrupt systemic bone metabolism, characterized by the inadequate bone formation and deregulated bone resorption2–8. In contrast, Mg2+ supplement is beneficial to patients with osteoporosis9. Magnesium, its alloys10–13 and derivatives14–16 have been extensively studied as replacements of non-degradable metallic implants e.g., titanium alloys in bone surgeries. Mg2+ modified biomaterials have shown a superior osteogenic capacity in many reports14–21. However, detrimental effects of Mg2+ released upon degradation have also been observed22–24. These conflicting results may reflect the incomplete understanding of the roles of Mg2+ in the complex biological process of bone healing.
Our group has recently reported that the incorporation of Mg2+ in polycaprolactone (PCL) implant18 and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microsphere19 can promote bone formation in a rat femoral defect model. We identified ~50–200 ppm as the optimal Mg2+ concentration for promoting osteogenic activities of osteoblasts in vitro, as well as new bone formation in vivo13,18. Moreover, by using customized biomaterials that enable the controlled release of Mg2+ at different stages of bone healing, we demonstrated that the bone regeneration rate and the quality of newly formed bone tissues depend on the release profile of Mg2+ 18,19. Bone healing is a complex process that involves the precise coordination of osteoclastogenesis and osteogenesis, through the interplay of multiple types of cells in a dynamic microenvironment. It is possible that the different cell types involved in various phases of bone healing, from early inflammation to the later bone formation and remodeling, may respond to Mg2+ in different ways.
The monocyte-macrophage cell lineage has been recognized as a major player in bone regeneration and in acute inflammation responses to biomaterials, mainly due to their high plasticity in response to environmental cues and their multiple roles in bone homeostasis. According to their distinct functional properties, surface markers, and inducers, macrophages are characterized into several phenotypes (i.e., M1, M2a, M2b, and M2c)25. The pro-inflammatory cytokines caused by Mg2+ deficiency can contribute to osteoclastogenesis26,27, whereas the Mg2+-induced anti-inflammatory cytokines and tissue repair factors benefit tissue regeneration28,29. The doping of Mg2+ into titanium30 and calcium phosphate cement31 was demonstrated to promote the M2 polarization of macrophages. However, there is yet a consensus on which macrophage phenotype is more beneficial to bone regeneration because both M132,33 and M234,35 phenotypes have been reported to contribute to osteogenesis. Moreover, the conventional M1/M2 classification of macrophages has been challenged by a more heterogeneous grouping method, which suggests there may exist a continuum between M1 and M2 phenotypes yet to be identified36. Thus, the complexity of the Mg2+-induced immunomodulation on macrophages, as well as its specific effects on the bone healing process in the complicated in vivo scenario requires further investigation.
In this study, we systematically analyzed the dose-dependent and time-dependent effects of Mg2+ on the monocyte-macrophage-osteoblast axis in bone healing and investigated the underlying mechanisms behind the action of Mg2+. We demonstrated a previously unknown immunomodulatory role of Mg2+ at the early phase of bone healing, in which macrophages are stimulated, through a signaling pathway that involves transient receptor potential cation channel member 7 (TRPM7), to generate a specific pro-osteogenic immune microenvironment. At the later bone repair/remodeling phase, the prolonged presence of Mg2+ impacts bone healing in another way, through activation of NF-κB signaling and inhibition on mineralization of extracellular matrix. We believe that these results will inspire the development of next-generation of Mg2+-based degradable biomaterials for clinical uses that can better harness the healing power of Mg2+.
Results
The time-dependent effect of Mg2+ on bone regeneration
To elucidate the time-dependent effect of Mg2+ on bone healing, we developed an alginate-based hydrogel that allows a transient release of MgCl2, at a concentration of ~10 mM, over one week (Fig. S1a). Critical-sized tunnel defects with a diameter of 2 mm were created in the distal end of rat femora18,19. Mg2+ hydrogel was injected into the cavities at different time points after the injury. Using scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX), we demonstrated that the Mg2+ releasing hydrogel significantly increased the magnesium content while decreasing the calcium content in the defects on day 7 post-injury (Fig. S1c–e). Meanwhile, plasma Mg2+ concentration remained unchanged (Fig. S1f), indicating that the implant caused a localized change in Mg2+ level without affecting systemic magnesium homeostasis. The impact of this implant on chloride levels would be negligible, as the physiological chloride concentration is over 100 times higher than the Mg2+ concentration37. The efficiency of Mg2+-induced bone repair was monitored using micro-CT over 8 weeks, compared to a control group in which equivalent alginate without Mg2+ was injected and a sham group in which the injured animals were not injected with any hydrogel. No observable healing was found in the sham group after 8 weeks (Fig. 1b, c, S2a, b). Transient exposure of Mg2+ during the first week after injury (Fig. 1a, Regimen 1 described in “Methods” section) led to a 3-fold increase in the trabecular bone fraction (BV/TV), a 2.5-fold increase in trabecular number (Tb. N), a 2-fold increase in bone mineral density (BMD of TV and BMD of BV) and a 2-fold increase in trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), as compared to the control and the sham groups (Fig. 1b, c, S2a, b). Nanoindentation test showed Mg2+ hydrogel promoted new bone formation without compromising the mechanical properties, as Young’s modulus of the Mg2+-induced newly formed bone at post-operation week 8 was comparable to the control and sham group (Fig. S1b). Histological assessments by H&E staining (Fig. 1d, S2S2c) confirmed the increase in bone formation in the defect grafted with Mg2+ releasing hydrogel. Meanwhile, the number of osteocalcins (OCN) positive osteoblasts increased in the Mg2+ treated group compared to the control and sham groups (Fig. 1e), whereas the number of tartaric acidic phosphatase (TRAP) positive osteoclasts in the Mg2+ treated group on day 56 decreased (Fig. 1f). Goldner’s trichrome staining (Fig. 1g) and Calcein/Xylenol labeling (Fig. 1h, S2d) demonstrated that new bone formation and mineral apposition were more active in the Mg2+ treated group than in the control.
Despite a higher trabecular bone fraction and bone mineral density, the overall beneficial effects of Mg2+ were significantly attenuated when the delivery of the Mg2+, even at the same dose, was delayed to the second week (Regimen 2, Fig. 2a–c, S3a, b). There was no significant difference in bone morphology according to H&E staining (Fig. 2d, S3c). Indeed, the number of OCN+ osteoblasts remains unchanged when the Mg2+ releasing hydrogel was applied at the second week of bone healing (Fig. 2e, S3d), while the number of TRAP+ osteoclasts was only slightly lower than the control (Fig. 2f). When Mg2+ was continuously delivered over the first two weeks post-injury (Regimen 3, Fig. 2g), the benefit of Mg2+ hydrogel on bone formation measured by micro-CT became negligible (Fig. 2h, i, Fig. S3e, f). In addition, bone morphology, as well as the number of OCN+ osteoblasts and TRAP+ osteoclasts were not different between the Mg2+ treated group and the control (Fig. 2j–l, S2g, h). These observations demonstrate that Mg2+ promotes bone healing only when delivered during the initial phase of repair, and a prolonged treatment resulted in unexpectedly detrimental effects on bone formation.
Mg2+-induced bone regeneration is mediated by macrophage activities
As the effective window of Mg2+ exposure coincided with the initial phase of inflammation dominated by macrophages38, it is possible that the effect of Mg2+ on bone formation might be mediated through its modulation of macrophages. Mg2+ releasing hydrogel contributed to a significant increase in the number of CD68 positive cells in the proximity of the defect on day 7 after the operation (Fig. 3b and Fig. S4b, c). These cells likely represented macrophages as the Mg2+-dependent recruitment of CD68+ cells vanished in animals treated with intraperitoneal administrations of liposome-encapsulated clodronate39 (Fig. 3a, b). Meanwhile, the addition of Mg2+ also contributed to a group of TRAP+ osteoclastic-like cells at the early stage (i.e., day 7) of bone healing (Fig. 3c). They are closely related to the group of macrophages responding to the stimulation of Mg2+ because these CD68+ osteoclastic-like cells (Fig. S4d) were also missing in the macrophage-depleted model (Fig. 3c). Compared with the vehicle group, which showed Mg2+-induced new bone formation, the osteo-promoting effects of Mg2+ were abolished in macrophage-depleted rats even when Mg2+ was delivered in the optimal time window. Indeed, Mg2+ exposure appeared to delay bone healing in these animals: the BV/TV was lower in Mg2+ treated group from day 14 to 28 relative to the control group (Fig. 3d, f, S4a), while histological analysis demonstrated that the effects of Mg2+ on promoting osteogenesis while suppressing osteoclastogenesis became insignificant (Fig. 3e, g, h, S4b).
We conducted in vitro experiments to further delineate the role of Mg2+ in macrophage functions by exposing THP1, a human monocyte cell line that can be differentiated into macrophages, to different Mg2+ concentrations (named 0.1×, 1×, and 10× to represent the Mg2+ concentrations in the respective medium relative to that in a physiological Mg2+ level in the culture medium, 0.8 mM). An increase of Mg2+ concentration in the culture medium significantly promoted the maturation of suspension monocytes into adhered macrophages (Fig. 4a, S5a). Mg2+ also increased the activity of THP1-derived macrophages, as evidenced by the increase of intracellular ATP levels (Fig. 4b) and the number of mitochondria (Fig. S5b). Furthermore, Mg2+ deficiency enhanced ROS production (Fig. 4c). RT-qPCR demonstrated that 10× Mg2+ treatment resulted in an increased expression of M2 macrophage surface markers CD163 and CD206 (Fig. 4d). This was further supported by flow cytometry data showing that the number of macrophages expressing M2 surface markers CD163 and CD206 was increased by the stimulation of 10× Mg2+, while the number of M1 macrophages characterized by the expression of CD80 remained unchanged (Fig. 4e). Our RT-qPCR data also revealed the effect of 10× Mg2+ on upregulating a series of genes encoding cytokines favoring osteogenesis, such as CCL5, IL-1ra, IL-8, TGF-β1, BMP2, VEGFA, IL-10, while downregulating genes encoding cytokines favoring osteoclastogenesis, including OSM, IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α (Fig. 4f). Using cytokine array, the major cytokines secreted by macrophages upon the stimulation of Mg2+ were found to be IL-1ra, IL-8, and CCL5, which were distinct from traditionally characterized M1 or M2 phenotypes (Fig. 4g, S5c). We confirmed the effects of Mg2+ on the expression of IL-1ra, IL-8, CCL5, and IL-1β by western blots (Fig. 4h). We also demonstrated that the effects of Mg2+ on the levels of IL-8 and IL-1β in THP1-derived macrophages to be both time-dependent and concentration-dependent (Fig. 4i, j S5d). Our findings on THP1-derived macrophages were validated on primary mouse bone marrow macrophages (BMM). We found that the exposure of BMM to 10× Mg2+ contributed to similar immunomodulatory effects as observed in THP1-derived macrophages (Fig. 4o): genes upregulated by 10× Mg2+ included IL-10, OSM, CCL5, and VEGFA, while the two major pro-inflammatory genes, TNF-α and IL-1β, were downregulated. Due to the lack of IL-8 in mice40, we confirmed the finding on the effect of Mg2+ on IL-8 in mouse BMM by examining the expression of Macrophage Inflammatory Protein 2 (MIP-2), the murine structural and functional homolog of human IL-841,42. We found that 10× Mg2+ treatment led to an ~1.5-fold increase in the expression of MIP-2 compared to the control. These in vitro findings were supported by our immunostaining and ELISA data in vivo showing that Mg2+ released from the hydrogel led to a significant increase in the level of IL-8 (Fig. 4k, m, S4c), CCL5 (Fig. S5e), and IL-1ra (Fig. S5f), as well as a significant decrease in the level of IL-1β (Fig.4l, n, S4c) in the femoral defects one-week post-operation. However, in macrophage-depleted animals, the level of these cytokines remained low and unchanged regardless of the addition of Mg2+ in the hydrogel. Taken together, our in vitro and in vivo data corroborate that an elevation of extracellular Mg2+ triggered a change in cytokine expression in macrophages.
The central role of TRPM7 in Mg2+-induced inflammatory modulation in macrophages
Using Mag-Fluo-4, an Mg2+ specific dye, we observed a rapid increase of intracellular Mg2+ levels in macrophage upon the addition of Mg2+ in the culture medium, peaking at ~8 min before reaching a steady-state higher than the baseline (Fig. 5a, b, Fig. S6a). Our ICP-OES data also verified that the Mg2+ level was consistently higher than the baseline when cultured in supplemented medium (Fig. S6b). As expected, when the channel activity of TRPM7, an Mg2+ transporter, was inhibited by FTY720, a potent TRPM7 blocker that inhibits channel activity by reducing the open probability43, the influx of Mg2+ became insignificant (Fig. 5a, b). In addition, our RT-qPCR data showed that 10× Mg2+ contributed to a more than two-fold upregulation of TRPM7 expression in THP1-derived macrophages (Fig.5c) and in mouse BMM (Fig. 6c), relative to the marginal increase in the MagT1 gene (Fig. 5c). Using an antibody that targets the C-terminal of TRPM7, a region containing the TRPM7-cleaved kinase fragments (M7CKs)44, we demonstrated that Mg2+ treatment increased the overall level of full-length TRPM7 in THP1-derived macrophages, with a corresponding increase in M7CKs (Fig. 5e). This observation was also validated in vivo by the increased expression of TRPM7 at the proximity of the Mg-alg grafted defect compared with Alg grafted control (Fig. S6c, d). Immunofluorescence staining (Fig. 5d, Fig. 6d) and subcellular fractionation (Fig. 5f) confirmed the accumulation of M7CKs in macrophage nuclei upon the stimulation of Mg2+. Moreover, the phosphorylation of Histone H3 at residue S10 (H3S10p) was found to be increased in THP1-derived macrophages (Fig. 5g, Fig. S6e) and mouse BMM (Fig. 6e) after Mg2+ treatment, consistent with the role of M7CKs in H3 phosphorylation44. Using super-resolution microscopy, we demonstrated that nuclear M7CKs were localized in foci that overlapped with a subset of H3 foci (Fig. S6f). Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays in THP1-derived macrophage showed that Mg2+ increased the association of H3S10p with the IL-8 promoter (Fig. 5h). Moreover, the gene loci at the proximity of the IκBα promoter were also enriched in pH3S10-containing chromatin in an Mg2+-dependent manner (Fig. 6i).
To elucidate the role of TRPM7 in Mg2+-mediated inflammation modulation, we selectively silenced the expression of TRPM7 with siRNA (Fig. 5j, S6g) or blocked the channel activity with FTY720 (Fig. 5b). Consequently, the nuclear translocation of M7CKs and the phosphorylation of Histone H3 were inhibited (Fig. 5k, l). Moreover, the effect of Mg2+ on cytokine expressions, such as the induction of IL-8 and the downregulation of IL-1β, was completely abolished (Fig. 5m, n). Interestingly, the loss of TRPM7 function appeared to disrupt the baseline expression of various inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-8, IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-1ra. As TRPM7 transports many divalent metal cations (e.g., Ca2+, Zn2+, Mn2+, and Co2+) other than Mg2+45,46, it is possible that the inhibition of TRPM7 may alter macrophage functions in multiple ways.
Mg2+ stimulated early osteoclastic differentiation
We demonstrated that prolonged exposure (i.e., 3 days or more) to Mg2+ led to an increased expression of IKK-α and IKK-β in THP1-derived macrophages (Fig. 6f), which contributed to the phosphorylation of IκB and the nuclear translocation of p65 (Fig. 6f, S6h). This suggests the stimulation of Mg2+ is associated with the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway in macrophages. In addition, siRNA knockdown of TRPM7 and, to a lesser extent, the chemical blockage of TRPM7, downregulated the expression of IκB kinases (IKK-α/β), IκB phosphorylation, and nuclear p65 (Fig. 6g). In consistent with the role of NF-κB signaling pathway in osteoclastogenesis, our data showed that an extended exposure (i.e., 14 days or more) of Mg2+ increased the number of TRAP+ cells (Fig. 6h, i), and extracellular TRAP activity (Fig. 6j) during the in vitro osteoclastic induction of THP1-derived macrophages by RANKL and M-CSF. However, our RT-qPCR data showed that only early osteoclastic markers (i.e., TRAP, RANK, and M-CSF) were elevated by the addition of Mg2+, whereas the late osteoclastic markers (i.e., CTSK and CTR), which indicates the maturation of osteoclasts, were downregulated (Fig. 6k). Supporting this observation, 10× Mg2+ did not lead to significant phosphorylation of JNK and upregulation of nuclear factor-activated T cells c1 (NFATc1), which both play a crucial role in the terminal maturation of osteoclast (Fig. 6l). Also, our in vivo data showed a transient exposure to Mg2+ resulted in more TRAP+ cells at the first week of bone healing but fewer TRAP+ cells on day 56 post-injury (Fig. 1f). Hence, Mg2+ stimulated the NF-κB signaling pathway, in a TRPM7-dependent manner, and early osteoclastogenic markers, but there is no evidence to support that this early differentiation resulted in mature osteoclasts.
Mg2+-mediated cytokines from macrophage contribute to bone formation
To demonstrate the effect of the macrophage-dependent inflammatory microenvironment on osteogenesis, we treated human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) with conditioned media (CM) harvested from THP1-derived macrophages pre-incubated in different concentrations of Mg2+ (named CM-0.1×, CM-1×, and CM-10×). The concentrations of Mg2+in all CM were adjusted to 1× before use (see “Methods” section). As expected, CM-10× (CM harvested from THP1-derived macrophages pre-incubated in 10× Mg2+) significantly increased the number (Fig. 6m) and osteogenic differentiation of MSC, as demonstrated by a two-fold increase in ALP activity (Fig. 6n) and the upregulation of osteogenic markers, including ALP, COL1A1, OPN, IBSP, BGLAP, and Osterix at both mRNA (Fig. 6o) and protein (Fig. S7a) levels. Meanwhile, CM-0.1× suppressed MSC proliferation and osteogenic gene expression (Fig. 6m–o). Alizarin red staining also revealed that CM from Mg2+-treated macrophage culture could accelerate the formation of mineralized nodules in MSC (Figs. 7a, S8a). This effect was more pronounced when CM from Mg2+ stimulated macrophage was administered during the first week of osteogenic induction of MSC (Fig. 7a).
Since our in vitro cytokine profiling (Fig. 4f–h) and in vivo immunostaining indicated IL-8 and IL-1β were two of the most significantly regulated cytokines from macrophages in response to Mg2+, we tested the effect of these two factors, individually and in combination, on MSC differentiation. The results indicated that human recombinant IL-8 replicated the effect of CM-10×, as evidenced by the significant increase in MSC proliferation (Fig. S7b), ALP activity (Fig. 7c), osteogenic genes expression (Fig. 7e), and mineralization (Fig. 7f). Although IL-1β led to a marginal increase in ALP activity and mineralization formation, it antagonized the osteogenic effects of IL-8 (Fig. 7c, f). Our data also showed that the osteogenic effect of recombinant IL-8, like CM-10×, was more prominent when it was added in the first week of culture. The presence of IL-8 in the late stage of osteogenic differentiation, instead, impaired the mineralization process (Fig. 7e). We next compared the osteogenic potential of CM-10× with and without the addition of IL-8 neutralizing antibodies. IL-8 neutralizing antibody could abolish the osteogenic effect of CM-10× in MSC, as there was no significant difference in the ALP activity and osteogenic gene expression between MSC cultured in CM-1× and CM-10× in the presence of IL-8 neutralizing antibody (Fig. 7b, d). Interestingly, the effect of CM-10× on the mineralization of MSC was only abolished by IL-8 neutralizing antibody when it was added in the first week of culture. If the depletion of IL-8 was extended to the second week of culture, it tended to favor the mineralization (Fig. S7c). Together, these data suggest that Mg2+ treated macrophages secreted IL-8, which induced osteogenesis in MSC especially when administrated during the initial phase of differentiation.
To distinguish the effect of macrophage-derived molecules from the direct action of Mg2+ on MSC, we also evaluated the osteogenic potential of MSC cultured in different levels of Mg2+. Mg2+ deficiency (0.1×) significantly reduced the ALP activity and the expression of osteogenic marker genes of MSC (Fig. 7g, S7e). Compared to CM-10×, which contained 1× Mg2+, an elevated level of extracellular Mg2+ (10×) only contributed to a < 10% increase in MSC proliferation (Fig. S7d) and a marginal increase in early osteogenic gene markers, such as COL1A1, Osterix, and Runx2 (Fig. S7e). Instead, most of the osteogenic markers, such as ALP, OPN, and BGLAP were not affected by the addition of Mg2+ (Fig. S7e, f). Moreover, even as Sirius red staining showed that 10× Mg2+ promoted the formation of extracellular matrix (Fig. S8a), a prolonged (2 weeks) exposure of a high level of Mg2+ (10×) could suppress the spontaneous mineralization (Fig. 7h, S8a). Interestingly, by exposing MSC to high (10×) Mg2+ in different time windows, we noticed that the inhibitory effect of high Mg2+ on MSC mineralization was only observed when it was administered during the second half of the two-week culture experiment (Fig. 7h). To further explore the temporal effects of Mg2+ on osteogenic differentiation, we analyzed precipitation formed under simulated physiological conditions using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The typical TEM images and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns of the precipitated calcium salts showed that the formation of crystallized apatite was significantly inhibited by the increase of Mg2+ level in the medium (Fig. S8b). X-ray diffraction data also indicated that the addition of Mg2+ led to a dramatic reduction of the hydroxyapatite phase, the predominant inorganic component in hard tissues (Fig. S8c).
Discussion
Mg2+ has been extensively used for the modification of orthopedics biomaterials due to observations that Mg2+ can contribute to enhanced osteogenesis18,47. Previous studies have speculated that Mg2+ modulates multiple signaling pathways at different stages in the differentiation process of mesenchymal stem cells toward osteoblast lineage24,47–49. For example, Mg2+ is suggested to promote the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of MSC by sequentially activating MAPK/ERK signaling pathway and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway49. Moreover, the activation of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) and bone morphogenic protein (BMP) signaling, who plays fundamental roles in regulating MSC differentiation during skeletal development, is associated with the stimulation of Mg2+23. Although our in vitro data in this study verified the direct osteogenic action of Mg2+ on MSC, especially at the initiation of osteogenic differentiation, we noticed excessive Mg2+ did not contribute to late osteoblastic activities, especially the mineralization of the extracellular matrix. Indeed, previous studies suggest that the addition of Mg2+ needs to be tailored to an optimal range (around 2–8 mM) to achieve its osteogenic effects, otherwise, the presence of high levels of Mg2+ can be detrimental to the osteogenic differentiation of bone-forming cells18,48,50. Hence, the conventional approach that focuses on the effect of Mg2+ on the osteoblast lineage cannot fully address the osteogenic effect of Mg and its alloy, especially in scenarios where bone-forming cells are continuously challenged by high concentrations of Mg2+ over a long period13,51. Recently, implant-derived Mg2+ is demonstrated to trigger the release of neuronal calcitonin gene-related polypeptide-α from dorsal root ganglia, resulting in enhanced osteogenic differentiation of periosteum-derived stem cells and improved bone-fracture healing52. This finding suggests that Mg2+ may contribute to the osteogenic differentiation of osteoblast lineage through the activation of various other cell types in the bone microenvironment.
By grafting Mg2+ releasing hydrogel at different stages of bone healing, our animal studies revealed an effective window for the administration of Mg2+ to achieve bone healing: the initial inflammation stage is more important than the subsequent active bone repair stage. As macrophages are known for their pivotal roles in the innate inflammatory response and their regulatory effects on bone homeostasis in tissue regeneration38,53,54, we selectively depleted the phagocytes in the early inflammation stage using liposome clodronate and showed that the osteogenic effect of Mg2+ was abolished. This suggests macrophages are the primary target cells responsible for Mg2+-induced bone healing, which corroborates with numerous studies showing macrophages play important roles in the healing of bone tissues55–58. In this study, our in vivo and in vitro data have provided compelling evidence showing the cellular activities of macrophages, especially the cytokine release profiles, to be significantly affected by the presence of Mg2+. First, the presence of Mg2+ facilitates the recruitment and activation of monocyte towards matured macrophages. Interestingly, although the upregulation of CD163 and CD206 suggest an M2 polarization of the Mg2+-treated macrophages, their cytokine secretion profile was distinct from the classical M1 and M2 regimes59, as inflammatory genes typically observed in M1 macrophages (e.g., IL-1β and TNF-α) and in M2 macrophages (e.g., IL-10) were not significantly upregulated. Moreover, genes that are known to be involved in macrophage-mediated osteogenesis (e.g., BMP258, OSM32, TGF-β160) were not dramatically altered by Mg2+ treatment. Instead, Mg2+ triggers a previously unknown cytokine profile, characterized by an increased level of CCL5, IL-8, and IL-1ra and the reduction of IL-1β. CCL5 and IL-8 are traditionally recognized as pro-inflammatory factors responsible for cell recruitment to the sites of injuries and inflammation61,62, however, both of them have been demonstrated capable of recruiting MSCs to bone healing site63,64. Moreover, IL-8 has been shown as a crucial mediator for angiogenesis61,65, the commitment of MSCs to bone regeneration63,66, and restricting bone resorption activity of osteoclasts67. IL-1β is one of the major pro-inflammatory cytokines that stimulate osteoclastogenesis68. A reduction of IL-1β in response to the addition of Mg2+, possibly due to the anti-inflammatory effect of Mg2+ and the IKK-dependent activation of NF-κB69, contributes to the generation of new bone. In addition, Mg2+ also upregulated the expression of IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL1-ra), which further limits IL-1β functions70. Collectively, our observations suggest that Mg2+ stimulated macrophages to a cytokine mixture tailored for bone regeneration.
TRPM7 is a predominant Mg2+ channel in mammalian cells. Conditional gene deletion experiments suggest that this transporter is involved in a variety of immune-related functions, including macrophage activation and polarization in a current dependent manner71, but the implications of these functions in tissue regeneration have not been well explored. Moreover, the intracellular Ser/Thr kinase domain located at the carboxyl terminus of the membrane channel is reported to modulate cellular functions by directly modifying channel activity45,72 or interacting with nuclear chromatin-remodeling complexes44. We observed that an increase in extracellular Mg2+ contributed to the upregulation of TRPM7 expression, as well as the cleavage and nuclear translocation of TRPM7 kinase fragments (M7CKs). Consequently, in consistent with a previous study44, these chromatin-bound M7CKs induced the phosphorylation of Histone H3 at Ser 10 (p-H3S10), which has been reported to be critical for the recruitment of IKK to NF-κB signaling responsive promotors73 and the binding of IKK to a variety of inflammatory gene promoters, such as CCL5 and IL-873–75. Our ChIP assay demonstrated that Mg2+ led to an increased association of p-H3S10 with the promoters of IL-8 and IκBα, thus establishing a role of Mg2+ in activating NF-κB signaling and the production of inflammatory cytokines like IL-8.
This study demonstrates the role of TRPM7 in the Mg2+-induced activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway, which is crucial in inflammation responses76. However, our experiments with the TRPM7 blocker FTY720 revealed that the channel activity of TRPM7 does not account for the entire spectrum of defects seen in TRPM7 siRNA-treated macrophages, especially in terms of the phosphorylation of H3S10 and the activation of NF-κB signaling. This implies the cleaved kinase domain may play a more important role in the regulation of inflammatory cytokines in response to Mg2+. Recent evidence suggests that divalent cations like Ca2+ may play dual roles in macrophages through TRPM7: a rapid role in jump-starting TLR4 endocytosis and possibly a slower role in tailoring an appropriate inflammatory response by modifying the activity of NF-κB77. Therefore, we propose that the TRPM7-mediated inflammatory response to Mg2+ can be time-dependent: an initial M7CK mediated phosphorylation of H3S10 located at specific gene promoters followed by a better-tailored activation of NF-κB signaling. This idea is supported by our observation that the promoting effect of Mg2+ on IL-8 secretion and the inhibitory effect on IL-1β was abrupted between 24–48 h after the treatment. Moreover, since IL-8 also serves as a strong inducer for the activation of NF-κB signaling, the increased IL-8 in the microenvironment resulting from the M7CK-mediated histone modification can enhance the NF-κB signaling cascade through the IL-8 receptor (CXCR1/2) expressed on the membrane of macrophage78,79. This explains why prolonged exposure to Mg2+ leads to unnecessary over activation of NF-κB signaling and osteoclastogenesis.
We detected a group of CD68+ and TRAP+ osteoclastic-like cells in the wound, which peaked on day 7 after the delivery of Mg2+. Unlike the TRAP+ multinucleated cells observed in the bone remodeling stage, osteoclastic-like cells at an early stage of bone healing have been suggested to represent inflammatory responses to biomaterials instead of bone resorption80. Indeed, they are actively involved in bone formation by the secretion of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines81. We noticed that a short-term delivery of Mg2+ contributed to an increased number of TRAP+ osteoclastic-like cells at the inflammation stage but ended with a lower number of bone-resorbing osteoclasts in the remodeling stage than the control or sham group. By contrast, when the delivery of Mg2+ was extended, the inhibitory effect of Mg2+ on osteoclastogenesis at the remodeling stage disappeared. Given the above-mentioned influence of Mg2+ on the activation of NF-κB signaling, which plays a central role in RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis82, the administration of Mg2+ beyond the early inflammation stage may be detrimental for bone regeneration.
In addition to the osteoclastogenic effect, we observed that the prolonged exposure to Mg2+ could also interfere with biomineralization. While a high level of Mg2+ (10×) administrated at the beginning of the osteogenic induction of MSC could promote extracellular matrix formation and mineralization, the supplementation of Mg2+ at the late stage dramatically impaired the mineralization of MSC. This finding recapitulated our in vivo data that the prolonged Mg2+ treatment could reduce BMD, as extensively reported elsewhere12,52. The formation of calcified tissue in the biological environment starts with the nucleation and growth of calcium phosphate precursors. The presence of Mg2+ may inhibit this process by selectively stabilizing more acidic hydrated precursor phases, like dicalcium phosphate83,84. Moreover, the adsorption of excessive Mg2+ on the surface of precursor and nuclei could further lead to the blocking of the active growth sites85. Thus, this study reveals the biphasic nature of Mg2+ effect on biological mineralization: during the early phase of MSC differentiation, Mg2+ itself and, to a much larger extent, osteogenic factors secreted by macrophage upon the stimulation of Mg2+, effectively promote osteogenic differentiation. However, as MSC is committed to osteoblast lineage, they become less responsive to Mg2+ and the Mg2+-induced immune factors. Instead, the persistent presence of Mg2+ beyond this stage suppresses mineralization and promotes osteoclastic bone resorption.
This study establishes the diverse and multifaceted roles of Mg2+ in bone healing (summarized in Fig. 7i). The delivery of Mg2+ contributes to the infiltration and the activation of the CD68+ macrophages in bone defects. The influx of Mg2+ through the TRPM7 channel and the nuclear translocation of M7CKs lead to the polarization of the macrophages into a pro-osteogenic subtype facilitating the recruitment and the osteogenic differentiation of MSC, which is distinct from the classical M1 or M2 phenotypes. Our findings suggest that the functional plasticity of macrophages may be more prevalent than previously described, eliciting specific responses tailored for different tissue or injury types. It is possible that the initial immune response to bone injury, orchestrated by cell types in the monocyte-macrophage-preosteoclast lineage, can be tuned to support tissue regeneration by a variety of signals, with Mg2+ being a defining example. However, the osteo-promoting functions of Mg2+ only operate during the early phase of osteogenesis as the continued stimulation of Mg2+ leads to the over-activation of NF-κB signaling. Moreover, the presence of Mg2+ and Mg2+-induced inflammatory cytokines in the later remodeling stage of bone healing increases the number of TRAP+ cells and inhibits the calcification of the extracellular matrix, resulting in compromised bone formation. In light of our findings, the use of Mg2+-based biomaterials as orthopedic implants must be viewed with caution, as these materials usually sustain an extended-release of Mg2+ which permeates into the wound with uncontrolled dose kinetics. The delicate balance between the osteo-promoting and osteo-inhibitory effects of Mg2+, if unchecked, will lead to unpredictable clinical outcomes.
Methods
Preparation of alginate gel
20% alginate gel (Alg) was prepared by mixing sodium alginate powder (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) in deionized water, while 10% magnesium chloride (MgCl2, Sigma-Aldrich) was used for the preparation of magnesium cross-linked alginate (Mg-alg). The gel was then loaded in a syringe and sterilized by gamma rays (Co-60) irradiation at a dose of 25 kGy. The as-prepared gel was immersed in 1× Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at a ratio of 0.1 g/mL and kept in an incubator at 37 °C for five days. At the designated time point, the Mg2+ concentration in the PBS was measured by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, Optima 2100DV, Perkin Elmer, USA).
Animal surgery
All the animal procedures were performed in accordance with a protocol approved by the Committee on the Use of Live Animals in Teaching and Research (CULATR, HKU). 6-8-week old Sprague Dawley (SD) rats, weighing 200–250 g, were purchased from Charles River Lab (USA) and maintained in the specific pathogen-free facilities (Lab animal unit, LAU, HKU). After the rats were anesthetized via intraperitoneal injections of ketamine hydrochloride (67 mg/kg; Alfamine, Alfasan International B.V., Holland) and xylazine hydrochloride (6 mg/kg; Alfazyne, Alfasan International B.V.). A tunnel defect, 2 mm in diameter, was prepared at the lateral epicondyle of each rat using a hand driller. Animals were randomly assigned into one of three treatment regimens; (1) injection of Mg2+ hydrogel directly after injury; (2) injection at day 7 post-injury and (3) injection at both day 0 and day 7 post-injury. Controls for each treatment regimen were animals injected with an equivalent dose of alginate hydrogel without Mg2+. After the layer-by-layer closure of the wound, the rats immediately received subcutaneous injections of terramycin (1 mg/kg) and ketoprofen (0.5 mg/kg).
Micro-CT analysis
In order to monitor the healing process and examine new bone formation around the gel, micro-CT scans were conducted at serial time points after the surgery (i.e., 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 56 days). After the rats were anesthetized, the grafted site was scanned using a live animal scanning device (SkyScan 1076, Kontich, Belgium). Two phantom contained rods with the standard densities of 0.25 and 0.75 g/cm3 were scanned with each sample for calibration. The resolution was set at 17.3 µm/pixel. Data reconstruction was done using the NRecon software (Skyscan Company), and image processing and analysis were done using CTAn software (Skyscan Company).
Fluorochrome labeling
Two fluorochrome labels were used sequentially to evaluate bone regeneration and remodeling within the defects. Calcein green (5 mg/kg, Sigma-Aldrich) was subcutaneously injected into rat femora one week after the surgery, while xylenol orange (90 mg/kg, Sigma-Aldrich) was injected three weeks after the surgery. The fluorochrome labels were visualized under fluorescence microscopy (Niko ECL IPSE 80i, Japan). The intensity of fluorescence was analyzed by ImageJ software (NIH, USA).
Histological analysis
After euthanasia, the femora were collected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution. For non-decalcified sections, the samples were dehydrated with gradient ethanol and embedded with methyl-methacrylate (MMA, Technovit 9100 New, Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, Germany) after using xylene as a transition. Then, the embedded samples were cut into slices with a thickness of 200 µm and micro-ground to a thickness of 50–70 µm. The selected sections were stained with Goldner’s trichrome (Sigma-Aldrich) staining. For decalcified sections, the samples were decalcified with 12.5% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, Sigma-Aldrich) for 6 weeks. The specimens were then dehydrated in ethanol, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 5 µm-thick sections using a rotary microtome (RM215, Leica Microsystems, Germany). Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and TRAP staining (Sigma-Aldrich) was performed on selected sections from each sample following the manufacturer’s instructions. Images were captured using polarizing microscopy (Nikon Eclipse VL100POL, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The quantification of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in the grafted defect area was done on ×10 histological images using ImageJ software (NIH, USA).
Scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS)
MMA embedded bone specimens were sliced and polished to ~100 µm before observation. The elemental composition and distribution in the grafted area were determined by SEM-EDS (SU1510, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
Immunohistochemistry analysis
The dewaxed slide was treated with Proteinase K (Sigma-Aldrich) for proteolytic digestion and 3% H2O2 for the elimination of endogenous peroxidase activity. After blocking with normal goat serum, the slides were incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4 °C, respectively. The primary antibodies used in this study include: rabbit anti-OCN (Abcam), rabbit anti-IL-8 (Abcam), rabbit anti-CCL5 (Abcam), rabbit anti-IL-1β (Abcam), rabbit anti-IL-1ra (Abcam), anti-CD68 (Abcam), rabbit anti-Phospho-Histone H3S10 (Abcam), and rabbit anti-TRPM7 (Abcam). The slides were then incubated with goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody and visualized using Diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining kit (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, USA) following the manufacturer’s instruction. Immunofluorescent staining was done using Alexa-Fluor 488 conjugated anti-rabbit IgG or Alexa-Fluor 647 conjugated anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Hoechst 33324 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Immunofluorescent images were captured using an LSM 780 confocal microscopy (Zeiss, Germany)
Detection of inflammatory cytokines
The femora of the rats grafted with pure alginate or Mg-crosslinked alginate were harvested. The bone tissues in and around the grafted defects, around 1 cm in length, were ground into mud using a ceramic mortar and pestle. The mud of bone tissue was then homogenized in pre-cooled RIPA Lysis and Extraction Buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific) for 1 h. The buffer solution was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected for protein concentration quantification with BCA Protein Assay Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific). An equal amount of protein from each sample was subjected to quantitative analysis of IL-8 and IL-1β using an ELISA kit (R&D system) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Cell culture
The human monocyte cell line THP1 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, VA, USA), and maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37 °C under 5% humidified CO2. Human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) was kindly provided by Prof. D. Campana (St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee), and maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM, Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37 °C under 5% humidified CO2. Macrophages were differentiated from THP1 cells using serum-free DMEM supplemented with 10 ng/mL phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, Sigma-Aldrich). After 48 h, the THP1-derived macrophages were further cultured in customized Mg-free DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with different concentrations of Mg2+ (i.e., 0.08 mM, 0.8 mM, and 8 mM) for another 72 h to allow full differentiation and polarization. Mouse bone marrow macrophages (BMM) were obtained by incubating bone marrow cells isolated from both femurs of C57BL/6J mice in a culture medium supplemented with 20 ng/mL macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF, R&D) for 6 days86.
To collect conditional medium (CM), THP1-derived macrophages that have been cultured at different concentrations of Mg2+ for three days were washed and incubated with fresh serum-free DMEM (contained 1× Mg2+) for 24 h. These media were then collected, mixed 1:2 (v/v) with fresh serum-free DMEM (also contained 1× Mg2+) for the culture of MSC. For osteogenic differentiation of MSC, osteogenic supplements (5 mM β-glycerol phosphate, 0.05 mM L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate, and 10−7 M Dexamethasone) were added to the serum-free DMEM. For osteoclastic differentiation of THP1-derived macrophages, RANKL (50 ng/mL), and M-CSF (30 ng/mL) were supplemented in the medium for a 14-day osteoclastic induction.
Flow cytometry assay
Flow cytometric assay was performed using FACSCantoII Analyzer (BD Biosciences, USA). Differentiated macrophages were detached with trypsin and washed with 1× PBS. For the detection of macrophage surface markers, cells were incubated with monoclonal mouse anti-human antibodies CD163-Cy5.5, CD206-FITC, and CD80-FITC (BD Biosciences, USA), or relevant isotypes (BD Biosciences) for 1 h at 4 °C in dark. After washing with 1× PBS, the fluorescence was compared to isotypes with 10,0000 events recorded. All flow cytometric data were analyzed using Flowjo software, version 10 (Tree Star, USA).
Cell attachment and proliferation assay
The effect of Mg2+ on the attachment of THP1-derived macrophages and the proliferation of MSC was assessed using a cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8, Dojindo, Japan). At designated time points, the culture medium was replaced by a fresh serum-free medium containing 10% CCK-8. The optical density (OD) value at the wavelength of 450 nm was measured using a microplate spectrophotometer (SpectraMax 340, Molecular Devices, USA). Cell viability was presented in percentage by comparing the OD value of the tested group to that of the control group.
ATP assay
After the stimulation of Mg2+, the macrophages were lysed, and the intracellular ATP concentrations were determined using a luminescence ATP detection assay (ATPLite, PerkinElmer, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Cytokine release
The cytokines produced by THP1-derived macrophages after the stimulation of different concentrations of Mg2+ were determined by Proteome Profiler antibody arrays (R&D System) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of IL-8 and IL-1β was further confirmed by specific ELISA kits (R&D System).
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assay
The effects of Mg2+ or conditional medium from macrophages on the ALP activity of MSC were evaluated using the p-NPP method. At the designated time points, the cells were lysed with 0.2% Triton X-100 at 4 °C for 2 h. The supernatant of the lysis after centrifugation was collected and assayed using an ALP detection kit (Sigma-Aldrich) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The total protein content was measured using BCA Protein Assay Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific). The relative ALP activity was normalized to total protein content and expressed as units/g·protein.
Mineralization assay
Sirius Red staining was used to study the formation of the extracellular matrix of MSC. At the designated time points, cells were fixed with 75% ethanol, and the collagen was stained with Sirius Red solution (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h. Alizarin Red staining was used to study the mineralization of MSC. At the designated time points, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and the mineralization nodules were stained with Alizarin Red solution (Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 min. After a thorough wash with Millipore water, the sample was dried in the air before photo taking.
Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assay
The total RNA of the cells was extracted and purified using the RNeasy Plus kit (Qiagen, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. For the reverse transcript, complementary DNA was synthesized using Takara RT Master Mix (Takara, Japan) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The primers used in the RT-qPCR assay were synthesized by Life Technologies (ThemoFisher Scientific) based on sequences retrieved from Primer Bank (http://pga.mgh.harvard.edu/primerbank/, Table S1). SYBR Green Premix Ex Taq (Takara) was used for the amplification and detection of cDNA targets on a StepOne Plus Real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, USA). The mean cycle threshold (Ct) value of each target gene was normalized to the housekeeping gene GAPDH. The results were shown in a fold change using the ∆∆Ct method.
Western blotting
At the designated time points after the treatment, the cells were rinsed with ice-cold PBS and lysed with RIPA Lysis and Extraction Buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific). After centrifugation at 15,000×g for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatants were collected for measuring the protein concentration with BCA Protein Assay Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific). Cytosolic and nuclear extracts were prepared using NE-PER reagents (ThermoFisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s instructions. A total of 30 µg of protein from each sample were subjected to SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and transferred to PVDF membrane (Merck Millipore, USA). Then the membrane was blocked in 5% w/v bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated with blocking buffer diluted primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The primary antibodies used include rabbit anti-TRPM7 (Abcam), rabbit anti-IL-8 (Abcam), rabbit anti-CCL5 (Abcam), rabbit anti-IL-1β (Abcam), rabbit anti-IL-1ra (Abcam), rabbit anti-OPN (Abcam), mouse anti-ALP (Santa Cruz, USA), rabbit anti-OCN (Abcam), rabbit anti-IKKβ (CST, USA), mouse anti-IKKα (CST), rabbit anti-NF-κB p65 (CST), rabbit anti-Phospho-IκBα (CST), mouse anti-IκBα (CST), rabbit anti-Phospho-Histone H3S10 (Abcam), rabbit anti-Histone H3 (Abcam), rabbit anti-Phospho-JNK (CST), rabbit anti-JNK (CST), mouse anti-NFATc1 (Santa Cruz), and mouse anti-β-actin (CST). The protein bands were visualized by ECL substrate (ThermoFisher Scientific) and exposed under ChemiDoc XRS System (BioRad, USA).
Immunocytochemistry analysis
Following the stimulation of DMEM containing different concentrations of Mg2+, cells were washed with 1× PBS three times, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 10 min either before or after fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde. The primary antibodies used include anti-TRPM7 (Abcam), anti-NF-κB p65 (CST), and anti-Phospho-H3S10 (Abcam). The secondary antibodies used include Alexa-Fluor 488 conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific), Alexa-Fluor 647 conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific). FITC-Phallotoxins (Sigma-Aldrich) and Hoechst 33342 (ThermoFisher Scientific) were used for counterstain. The fluorescent images were captured using a Carl Zeiss LSM 780 confocal microscopy (Carl Zeiss, Germany).
Detection of Mg uptake in macrophages
THP1-derived macrophages were incubated in Mg2+-free DMEM (ThermoFisher Scientific) supplemented with 4 µM Mag-Fluo-4 (ThermoFisher Scientific) and 1 µM F-127 (ThermoFisher Scientific) for 30 min. After that, cells were washed with Mg2+-free DMEM and counterstained with Hoechst 33324. Real-time images were captured using a spinning confocal microscope (Perkin Elmer Instruments, USA) immediately after the addition of 8.0 mM MgCl2 into the Mg2+-free DMEM. For visualization of mitochondrial, cells were pretreated with MitoTracer (ThermoFisher Scientific) for 1.5 h before observation.
Super-resolution microscopy
THP1-derived macrophages were seeded on coverslips with locking beads. After the treatment, cells were washed with 1× PBS three times, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100. Then, the cells were incubated with mouse anti-TRPM7 and rabbit anti-Histone H3 primary antibodies overnight. After thorough washing steps with PBS, they were stained with Alexa-Fluor 647 and Alexa-Fluor 488 conjugated secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific) before being mounted to a Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy (STORM, Nanobioimaging Ltd., Hong Kong).
TRPM7 inhibition and blockage
For TRPM7 silencing, THP1-derived macrophages were transfected with 10 nM siRNA targeting human TRPM7 (SR310261, OriGene, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions using siTran1.0 (OriGene, USA) as the agent. Cells transfected with nonspecific control siRNA (SR30004, OriGene, USA) were used as the control. siRNA transfection efficiency was verified 72 h after the transfection by western blots. For the inhibition of TRPM7 activity, cells were pretreated with 3 µM FTY720 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 2 h, washed with 1× PBS, and subjected to the other assays.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation
After the stimulation, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay was performed using a ChIP kit (Abcam) as described by the manufacturer’s instruction. In brief, chromatin from crosslinked macrophages was sheared by sonication (8 of 30 s-on and 30 s-off pulses at high power output, Bioruptor Plus, USA) and incubated overnight with rabbit anti-Phospho-Histone H3S10 (Abcam) at 4 °C. Precipitated DNAs were analyzed by RT-qPCR with SYBR Green Premix Ex Taq (Takara) and primers for human IL-8 promoter (−121 to +61) 5′-GGGCCATCAGTTGCAAATC-3′ and 5′-TTCCTTCCGGTGGTTTCTTC-3′, human IκBα promoters (−316 to −15) 5′-GACGACCCCAATTCAAATCG-3′ and 5′-TCAGGCTCGGGGAATTTCC-3′, as well as a human β-actin promoter (−980 to −915) 5′-TGCACTGTGCGGCGAAGC-3′ and 5′-TCGAGCCATAAAAGGCAA-3′.
Statistical analysis
Each experiment was performed at least three times, and the results were expressed as means ± standard deviations (s.d.). For the data analysis, either one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison post hoc test or two-sample t-test was performed with SPSS ver.13.0 (IBM SPSS, USA). The level of significant difference among groups was defined and noted as *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge HKU Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine Faculty Core Facility for providing a harmonious working environment. This work was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (R&D#2018YFA0703100), General Research Fund of Hong Kong Research Grant Council (#17214516, #N_HKU725/16), Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen Team of Excellence in Spinal Deformities and Spinal Degeneration Disease (SZSM201612055), Shenzhen Science and Technology Funds (JSGG20180507183242702), Hong Kong Innovation Technology Fund (ITS/287/17 and ITS/405/18), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (No. 18410760600), International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (GJHZ1850), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81970975), and Guangdong Financial Fund for Hige-Caliber Hospital Construction (174-2018-XMZC-0001-03-2125/D-10). We thank Dr. Stuart Fraser, School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Australia, and Prof. Cao Xu, Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, the Johns Hopkins University, for their useful comments.
Source data
Author contributions
W.Q., K.H.M.W., J.S., and W.W. conducted animal surgery and analyzed the results. W. Qiao, J. Wu and J. Li contributed to the cell culture and the in vitro tests. K.H.M. Wong and Z. Lin were responsible for the preparation of Mg-releasing alginate. Z.T. Chen, K. Lai, and Y.W. Lam contributed to the design of in vitro experiments. J.P. Matinlinna, Y. Zheng, S. Wu, and X. Liu provide insightful comments on the material-science-related issues. K.M.C. Cheung and Z.F. Chen contributed to the design of animal models and provided invaluable suggestions about clinical indications of the study. Y.W. Lam, K.W.K. Yeung and Z.F. Chen contributed to data interpretation and supervised the project. W. Qiao illustrated the schematic diagram. W. Qiao, Y.W. Lam and K.W.K. Yeung wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.
Data availability
All the data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Geert Carmeliet, Rhian Touyz and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Zhuofan Chen, Email: chzhuof@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Yun Wah Lam, Email: yunwlam@cityu.edu.hk.
Kelvin W. K. Yeung, Email: wkkyeung@hku.hk
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-021-23005-2.
References
- 1.Gong T, et al. Nanomaterials and bone regeneration. Bone Res. 2015;3:15029. doi: 10.1038/boneres.2015.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rude RK, Gruber HE, Wei LY, Frausto A, Mills BG. Magnesium deficiency: effect on bone and mineral metabolism in the mouse. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2003;72:32–41. doi: 10.1007/s00223-001-1091-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Salimi MH, Heughebaert JC, Nancollas GH. Crystal-growth of calcium phosphates in the presence of magnesium-ions. Langmuir. 1985;1:119–122. doi: 10.1021/la00061a019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kenney MA, McCoy H, Williams L. Effects of magnesium deficiency on strength, mass, and composition of rat femur. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1994;54:44–49. doi: 10.1007/BF00316289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Boskey AL, et al. Effect of short-term hypomagnesemia on the chemical and mechanical properties of rat bone. J. Orthop. Res. 1992;10:774–783. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100100605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Carpenter TO, Mackowiak SJ, Troiano N, Gundberg CM. Osteocalcin and its message - relationship to bone-histology in magnesium-deprived rats. Am. J. Physiol. 1992;263:E107–E114. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1992.263.1.E107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rude RK, et al. Magnesium deficiency-induced osteoporosis in the rat: uncoupling of bone formation and bone resorption. Magnes. Res. 1999;12:257–267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gruber HE, et al. Magnesium deficiency: effect on bone mineral density in the mouse appendicular skeleton. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2003;4:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-4-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Castiglioni S, Cazzaniga A, Albisetti W, Maier JA. Magnesium and osteoporosis: current state of knowledge and future research directions. Nutrients. 2013;5:3022–3033. doi: 10.3390/nu5083022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li X, et al. Design of magnesium alloys with controllable degradation for biomedical implants: from bulk to surface. Acta Biomater. 2016;45:2–30. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wong HM, et al. Functionalized polymeric membrane with enhanced mechanical and biological properties to control the degradation of magnesium alloy. Adv. Health. Mater. 2017;6:1601269. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201601269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wong HM, et al. A biodegradable polymer-based coating to control the performance of magnesium alloy orthopaedic implants. Biomaterials. 2010;31:2084–2096. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wong HM, et al. In vivo stimulation of bone formation by aluminum and oxygen plasma surface-modified magnesium implants. Biomaterials. 2013;34:9863–9876. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yamasaki Y, et al. Synthesis of functionally graded MgCO3 apatite accelerating osteoblast adhesion. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002;62:99–105. doi: 10.1002/jbm.10220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhang J, et al. Magnesium modification of a calcium phosphate cement alters bone marrow stromal cell behavior via an integrin-mediated mechanism. Biomaterials. 2015;53:251–264. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yin M, et al. Incorporation of magnesium ions into photo-crosslinked alginate hydrogel enhanced cell adhesion ability. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2015;9:1088–1092. doi: 10.1002/term.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Park JW, An CH, Jeong SH, Suh JY. Osseointegration of commercial microstructured titanium implants incorporating magnesium: a histomorphometric study in rabbit cancellous bone. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 2012;23:294–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02144.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wong HM, et al. Low-modulus Mg/PCL hybrid bone substitute for osteoporotic fracture fixation. Biomaterials. 2013;34:7016–7032. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lin Z, et al. Precisely controlled delivery of magnesium ions thru sponge-like monodisperse PLGA/nano-MgO-alginate core-shell microsphere device to enable in-situ bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2018;174:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Park JW, Ko HJ, Jang JH, Kang H, Suh JY. Increased new bone formation with a surface magnesium-incorporated deproteinized porcine bone substitute in rabbit calvarial defects. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2012;100:834–840. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Brown A, Zaky S, Ray H, Jr, Sfeir C. Porous magnesium/PLGA composite scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration following tooth extraction. Acta Biomater. 2015;11:543–553. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Leidi M, Dellera F, Mariotti M, Maier JA. High magnesium inhibits human osteoblast differentiation in vitro. Magnes. Res. 2011;24:1–6. doi: 10.1684/mrh.2011.0271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li RW, et al. The influence of biodegradable magnesium alloys on the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2014;102:4346–4357. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Luthringer BJ, Willumeit-Romer R. Effects of magnesium degradation products on mesenchymal stem cell fate and osteoblastogenesis. Gene. 2016;575:9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lawrence T, Natoli G. Transcriptional regulation of macrophage polarization: enabling diversity with identity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011;11:750–761. doi: 10.1038/nri3088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Malpuech-Brugere C, et al. Enhanced tumor necrosis factor-alpha production following endotoxin challenge in rats is an early event during magnesium deficiency. Biochim. et. Biophys. Acta. 1999;1453:35–40. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4439(98)00081-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shogi T, et al. Effects of a low extracellular magnesium concentration and endotoxin on IL-1beta and TNF-alpha release from, and mRNA levels in, isolated rat alveolar macrophages. Magnes. Res. 2002;15:147–152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang X, et al. Rod-shaped and substituted hydroxyapatite nanoparticles stimulating type 1 and 2 cytokine secretion. Colloids Surf. B. 2016;139:10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dowling O, et al. Magnesium sulfate reduces bacterial LPS-induced inflammation at the maternal-fetal interface. Placenta. 2012;33:392–398. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li B, et al. In vitro and in vivo responses of macrophages to magnesium-doped titanium. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:42707. doi: 10.1038/srep42707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 31.Wang M, et al. Improved osteogenesis and angiogenesis of magnesium-doped calcium phosphate cement via macrophage immunomodulation. Biomater. Sci. 2016;4:1574–1583. doi: 10.1039/C6BM00290K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Guihard P, et al. Induction of osteogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells by activated monocytes/macrophages depends on oncostatin M signaling. Stem Cells. 2012;30:762–772. doi: 10.1002/stem.1040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nicolaidou V, et al. Monocytes induce STAT3 activation in human mesenchymal stem cells to promote osteoblast formation. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e39871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chen Z, et al. Osteoimmunomodulatory properties of magnesium scaffolds coated with beta-tricalcium phosphate. Biomaterials. 2014;35:8553–8565. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chen Z, et al. Osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow MSCs by beta-tricalcium phosphate stimulating macrophages via BMP2 signalling pathway. Biomaterials. 2014;35:1507–1518. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008;8:958–969. doi: 10.1038/nri2448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jentsch TJ, Stein V, Weinreich F, Zdebik AA. Molecular structure and physiological function of chloride channels. Physiol. Rev. 2002;82:503–568. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00029.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chen Z, et al. Osteoimmunomodulation for the development of advanced bone biomaterials. Mater. Today. 2015;19:304–321. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Biewenga J, et al. Macrophage depletion in the rat after intraperitoneal administration of liposome-encapsulated clodronate: depletion kinetics and accelerated repopulation of peritoneal and omental macrophages by administration of Freund’s adjuvant. Cell Tissue Res. 1995;280:189–196. doi: 10.1007/BF00304524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Singer M, Sansonetti PJ. IL-8 is a key chemokine regulating neutrophil recruitment in a new mouse model of Shigella-induced colitis. J. Immunol. 2004;173:4197–4206. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.6.4197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tekamp-Olson P, et al. Cloning and characterization of cDNAs for murine macrophage inflammatory protein 2 and its human homologues. J. Exp. Med. 1990;172:911–919. doi: 10.1084/jem.172.3.911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Worgall S. Stranger in a strange land: IL-8 in the mouse lung? Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2018;59:525–526. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2018-0206ED. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Qin X, et al. Sphingosine and FTY720 are potent inhibitors of the transient receptor potential melastatin 7 (TRPM7) channels. Br. J. Pharm. 2013;168:1294–1312. doi: 10.1111/bph.12012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Krapivinsky G, Krapivinsky L, Manasian Y, Clapham DE. The TRPM7 chanzyme is cleaved to release a chromatin-modifying kinase. Cell. 2014;157:1061–1072. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nadler MJ, et al. LTRPC7 is a Mg.ATP-regulated divalent cation channel required for cell viability. Nature. 2001;411:590–595. doi: 10.1038/35079092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nadolni, W. & Zierler, S. The channel-kinase TRPM7 as novel regulator of immune system homeostasis. Cells7, 109 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Lin S, et al. A magnesium‐enriched 3D culture system that mimics the bone development microenvironment for vascularized bone regeneration. Adv. Sci. 2019;6:1900209. doi: 10.1002/advs.201900209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yoshizawa S, Brown A, Barchowsky A, Sfeir C. Magnesium ion stimulation of bone marrow stromal cells enhances osteogenic activity, simulating the effect of magnesium alloy degradation. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:2834–2842. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wang Y, et al. Unraveling the osteogenesis of magnesium by the activity of osteoblasts in vitro. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2018;6:6615–6621. doi: 10.1039/C8TB01746H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yang C, et al. Effects of magnesium alloys extracts on adult human bone marrow-derived stromal cell viability and osteogenic differentiation. Biomed. Mater. 2010;5:045005. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/5/4/045005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Han P, et al. In vitro and in vivo studies on the degradation of high-purity Mg (99.99wt.%) screw with femoral intracondylar fractured rabbit model. Biomaterials. 2015;64:57–69. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.06.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhang Y, et al. Implant-derived magnesium induces local neuronal production of CGRP to improve bone-fracture healing in rats. Nat. Med. 2016;22:1160. doi: 10.1038/nm.4162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Takayanagi H. Osteoimmunology: shared mechanisms and crosstalk between the immune and bone systems. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007;7:292. doi: 10.1038/nri2062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gordon S. Alternative activation of macrophages. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2003;3:23–35. doi: 10.1038/nri978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chang MK, et al. Osteal tissue macrophages are intercalated throughout human and mouse bone lining tissues and regulate osteoblast function in vitro and in vivo. J. Immunol. 2008;181:1232–1244. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.2.1232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Vi L, et al. Macrophages promote osteoblastic differentiation in-vivo: implications in fracture repair and bone homeostasis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2015;30:1090–1102. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Alexander KA, et al. Osteal macrophages promote in vivo intramembranous bone healing in a mouse tibial injury model. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2011;26:1517–1532. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Champagne CM, Takebe J, Offenbacher S, Cooper LF. Macrophage cell lines produce osteoinductive signals that include bone morphogenetic protein-2. Bone. 2002;30:26–31. doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00638-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Biswas SK, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and interaction with lymphocyte subsets: cancer as a paradigm. Nat. Immunol. 2010;11:889–896. doi: 10.1038/ni.1937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tang Y, et al. TGF-beta1-induced migration of bone mesenchymal stem cells couples bone resorption with formation. Nat. Med. 2009;15:757–765. doi: 10.1038/nm.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Koch AE, et al. Interleukin-8 as a macrophage-derived mediator of angiogenesis. Science. 1992;258:1798–1801. doi: 10.1126/science.1281554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Marques RE, Guabiraba R, Russo RC, Teixeira MM. Targeting CCL5 in inflammation. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2013;17:1439–1460. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2013.837886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Yoon DS, et al. Synergistic action of IL-8 and bone marrow concentrate on cartilage regeneration through upregulation of chondrogenic transcription factors. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2016;22:363–374. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2015.0425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Cordova LA, et al. CCL2, CCL5, and IGF-1 participate in the immunomodulation of osteogenesis during M1/M2 transition in vitro. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2017;105:3069–3076. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Medina RJ, et al. Myeloid angiogenic cells act as alternative M2 macrophages and modulate angiogenesis through interleukin-8. Mol. Med. 2011;17:1045. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2011.00129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Yang A, et al. IL-8 enhances therapeutic effects of BMSCs on bone regeneration via CXCR2-mediated PI3k/Akt signaling pathway. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2018;48:361–370. doi: 10.1159/000491742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Fuller K, Owens JM, Chambers TJ. Macrophage inflammatory protein-1-alpha and Il-8 stimulate the motility but suppress the resorption of isolated rat osteoclasts. J. Immunol. 1995;154:6065–6072. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Manolagas SC, Jilka RL. Bone marrow, cytokines, and bone remodeling. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995;332:305–311. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199502023320506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Greten FR, et al. NF-κB is a negative regulator of IL-1β secretion as revealed by genetic and pharmacological inhibition of IKKβ. Cell. 2007;130:918–931. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Dinarello CA. Overview of the interleukin-1 family of ligands and receptors. Semin. Immunol. 2013;25:389–393. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2013.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Schilling T, Miralles F, Eder C. TRPM7 regulates proliferation and polarisation of macrophages. J. Cell Sci. 2014;127:4561–4566. doi: 10.1242/jcs.151068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Schmitz C, et al. Regulation of vertebrate cellular Mg2+ homeostasis by TRPM7. Cell. 2003;114:191–200. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00556-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Yamamoto Y, Verma UN, Prajapati S, Kwak YT, Gaynor RB. Histone H3 phosphorylation by IKK-alpha is critical for cytokine-induced gene expression. Nature. 2003;423:655–659. doi: 10.1038/nature01576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Li H, et al. Role of hydrogen sulfide in paramyxovirus infections. J. Virol. 2015;89:5557–5568. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00264-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Végran F, Boidot R, Michiels C, Sonveaux P, Feron O. Lactate influx through the endothelial cell monocarboxylate transporter MCT1 supports an NF-κB/IL-8 pathway that drives tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2011;71:2550–2560. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Baldwin AS., Jr The NF-κB and IκB proteins: new discoveries and insights. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1996;14:649–681. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.14.1.649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Schappe MS, et al. Chanzyme TRPM7 mediates the Ca(2+) influx essential for lipopolysaccharide-induced toll-like receptor 4 endocytosis and macrophage activation. Immunity. 2018;48:59–74 e55. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.11.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Bendre MS, et al. Tumor-derived interleukin-8 stimulates osteolysis independent of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand pathway. Cancer Res. 2005;65:11001–11009. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Manna SK, Ramesh GT. Interleukin-8 induces nuclear transcription factor-κB through a TRAF6-dependent pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:7010–7021. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410994200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Lorenz J, et al. TRAP-positive multinucleated giant cells are foreign body giant cells rather than osteoclasts: results from a split-mouth study in humans. J. Oral. Implantol. 2015;41:e257–e266. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-14-00273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Huang, R., Wang, X., Zhou, Y. H. & Xiao, Y. RANKL-induced M1 macrophages are involved in bone formation. Bone Res.5, 1–13 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 82.Iotsova V, et al. Osteopetrosis in mice lacking NF-kappaB1 and NF-kappaB2. Nat. Med. 1997;3:1285–1289. doi: 10.1038/nm1197-1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Barrere F, van Blitterswijk CA, de Groot K, Layrolle P. Nucleation of biomimetic Ca-P coatings on Ti6Al4V from a SBF x 5 solution: influence of magnesium. Biomaterials. 2002;23:2211–2220. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00354-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Wang L, Nancollas GH. Calcium orthophosphates: crystallization and dissolution. Chem. Rev. 2008;108:4628–4669. doi: 10.1021/cr0782574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Kanzaki N, Onuma K, Treboux G, Tsutsumi S, Ito A. Inhibitory effect of magnesium and zinc on crystallization kinetics of hydroxyapatite (0001) face. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2000;104:4189–4194. doi: 10.1021/jp9939726. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Sjöstrand M, et al. TRIM21 controls toll‐like receptor 2 responses in bone‐marrow‐derived macrophages. Immunology. 2020;159:335–343. doi: 10.1111/imm.13157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All the data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request. Source data are provided with this paper.