Skip to main content
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports logoLink to International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
. 2021 May 6;83:105954. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.105954

Medial subtalar dislocation from a low-energy trauma. A case report and review of the literature

V De Luna 1, A Caterini 1, L Petrungaro 1, M Barosso 1, F De Maio 1, P Farsetti 1,
PMCID: PMC8129932  PMID: 33975201

Abstract

Introduction

Subtalar dislocation is a rare injury characterized by a simultaneous dislocation of the talocalcaneal and talonavicular joints. The most common type is caused by high-energy trauma with medial dislocation of the foot. This injury is frequently associated with fractures, but isolated dislocations are also reported.

Case presentation

We report a rare case of medial subtalar dislocation secondary to low-energy injury in a 61-year-old woman. Following X-rays and CT scan, prompt closed reduction was performed under sedation and, after reduction, X-rays showed a good realignment of the foot. The CT scan revealed an occult non-displaced fracture of the posterior part of the talus. The patient was managed conservatively by a non-weight bearing cast for four weeks, followed by a rehabilitation program. At follow-up, six months later, we observed a good clinical and radiographic result.

Discussion

The reported case confirms that the mechanism of injury is an important factor in predicting the final result, since subtalar dislocations secondary to a high-energy trauma are often associated with significant complications. We believe, in agreement with other authors, that a low-energy trauma generally doesn't produce long-term morbidity. Prompt reduction is very important in order to minimize soft tissue and neurovascular complications, although a CT is recommended to identify occult fractures.

Conclusion

Subtalar dislocations, caused by low energy trauma, if adequately reduced in the emergency room, generally heal with conservative treatment, reducing the risk of significant complications. However, since we report a single patient, further case analysis is needed to make solid conclusions.

Keywords: Subtalar joint, Talonavicular joint, Subtalar dislocation, Medial subtalar dislocation, Low energy trauma

Highlights

  • Subtalar dislocation is a rare injury characterized by a simultaneous dislocation of the talocalcaneal and talonavicular joints

  • Subtalar dislocation caused by low energy trauma is uncommon.

  • An immediate reduction under sedation is fundamental, in order to prevent damage to the soft tissues and neurovascular complications

  • These lesions, if adequately reduced in the emergency room, heal with conservative treatment without complications

1. Introduction

Subtalar dislocations are uncommon injuries characterized by simultaneous dislocation of talocalcaneal and talonavicular joints. This injury was first reported in 1811 by two different authors [1,2]. Medial dislocations represent the most common forms and are produced by an inversion force; they have also been called “basketball foot” or “acquired clubfoot” because of their similarity to the congenital clubfoot [3,4]; they account for about 80% of all cases [5]. Lateral dislocations, also called “acquired flatfoot”, represent 15–20% of subtalar dislocations and generally occur after an eversion injury [6]. Posterior and anterior dislocations are extremely rare and account for about 3% of all subtalar dislocations [5]. Subtalar dislocations are usually the result of high-energy trauma and account for about 1% of all dislocations of the large joints [[6], [7], [8], [9]]. The rarity of this injury can be attributed to the strong ligaments connecting the talocalcaneal joint. Frequently, subtalar dislocation occurs in the third decade of life and it is ten times more frequent in men than in women [10]. In the majority of cases, subtalar dislocations occur after falls from significant height, road traffic accidents or during sports, as basketball games or football tackles [[8], [9], [10]]. These lesions may be isolated, but often they are associated to fractures of the talus, the malleoli or the fifth metatarsal bone [6,8]. We present a rare case of medial subtalar dislocation with an associated undisplaced fracture of the posterior part of the talus in a 61-year-old woman that occurred after low-energy ankle trauma, analysing the literature regarding this type of injury.

2. Case report

This paper is reported in line with the SCARE 2020 criteria [11].

A 61-year-old woman presented to the emergency department of our hospital with pain, swelling and ankle deformity that occurred after an inversion injury to foot (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). The injury occurred while walking and she was unable to stand or walk. The patient denied any other significant medical or genetic problems or psychosocial history and did not refer previous injuries to the ankle or ligament laxity. Physical examination revealed an evident medial dislocation of the ankle without neurovascular compromise, and no laceration of the skin was observed. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the ankle showed a medial subtalar dislocation without apparent associated bone injuries, but a computed tomography scan, performed immediately after, revealed an occult undisplaced fracture of the talus (Fig. 2). Closed reduction under sedation with propofol and fentanyl was performed and post-reduction radiographs showed a good realignment of the foot (Fig. 3). Before the procedure, the patient was informed about the treatment perspective and possible risk and complications. The first author (VDL), who has considerable experience in the emergency room, performed the procedure. The patient was immobilized initially in a posterior splint for few days and subsequently, in a short-leg cast for four weeks. Both were well tolerated by the patient for the entire time. She started a rehabilitation program after cast removal and partial weight bearing was initiated. Full weight bearing was reached after 10 weeks. At follow-up, six months later, the patient was pain free, she had a full range of motion of the ankle and foot without any sign of ligament laxity; radiographs showed good alignment of the foot with no evidence of avascular necrosis (Fig. 4). The patient returned to her pre-injury activities in absence of joint instability.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Clinical and radiographic views of a closed medial subtalar dislocation of the right foot in a 61-year-old patient.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

CT of the ankle and the foot with 3D reconstruction confirmed the diagnosis, but showed an associated undisplaced fracture of the posterior part of the talar bone (arrow).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Radiographic examination of the subtalar joint after closed reduction and casting.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

The radiographic examination performed at follow-up, six months later, showed a stable anatomic reduction. The patient was pain free with ankle and foot range of motion comparable to the unaffected contralateral side.

3. Discussion

Subtalar dislocation is a rare entity in traumatology [[6], [7], [8], [9]]; the most common form is the medial subtalar dislocation that accounts for about 80 of all cases [5] and generally occurs after a high-energy trauma, as reported by some authors [[12], [13], [14], [15]]. Lasanianos et al. [12] in a retrospective study including 8 patients with medial subtalar dislocation, reported that all patients but one, had a high energy trauma (87.5%) (motor vehicle accident or fall from height). The remaining patient had an inversion injury caused by entrapment of the foot in a gap. Camarda et al. [13] in another retrospective study reported a series of 21 patients with a closed subtalar dislocation caused by motor vehicle accidents or falls from height. Ruhlmann et al. [14], reported 13 patients who had sustained isolated subtalar dislocations, after high energy trauma (fall from an elevated place, accident on the public road or trauma during sport). According with these studies, subtalar dislocation secondary to a high energy trauma is often associated with significant long-term complications such as ligament laxity, stiffness of subtalar joints and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. On the contrary, subtalar dislocation from a low-energy trauma is very rare. Byrd et al. [15] reviewed the literature on isolated subtalar dislocations published between 2007 and 2012. They described a total of 95 patients included in 21 studies, reporting four mechanisms of injury: motor vehicle collisions, falls from a height, sports injuries and low-energy trauma that represent less than 10% of all cases.

To the best of our knowledge, only five cases of subtalar dislocation following to a low-energy mechanism are reported in 4 studies [[16], [17], [18], [19]] (Table 1). Jungbluth et al. [16] in a retrospective study from January 1994 to March 2007, reported the functional results of 23 patients with an isolated subtalar dislocation. Only in two of these the cause of the medial dislocation was an inversion injury of the foot which occurred while walk. Following a successful stable closed reduction, both patients were managed with immobilization in a short leg cast for six weeks. After that, progressive weight-bearing and aggressive physiotherapy was started. At the final follow-up, good clinical and radiographic results were observed in both patients. Other authors [[17], [18], [19]] reported in three studies, isolated cases of medial subtalar dislocation that occurred after low energy trauma in three different patients. All these injuries were treated conservatively with good final results. Brison et al. [17] reported a case of a 24-years old male caused by a forced plantar flexion and inversion injury while climbing out of his car treated by closed reduction and casting under anesthesia. The patient made full recovery and returned to his pre-injury functional status. Pesce et al. [18] reported a case of a 37-years old woman caused by a low velocity mechanism during military training exercises, treated by closed reduction under sedation with etomidate and fentanyl and immobilization by splint. CT scan did not show any associated skeletal injuries. McKead et al. [19] reported a case of an 18-year old male with a low energy trauma following a jump while playing football, treated by closed reduction and casting under general anesthesia. Two weeks after the injury, a CT scan revealed a non-displaced fracture of the neck of the talus, therefore a second short-leg cast was applied without weight-bearing for another four weeks, followed by weight-bearing aircast boot.

Table 1.

Studies reporting cases of medial subtalar dislocation caused by low-energy trauma.

Papers Age at trauma Mechanism of injury Associated lesions Treatment Final result
Jungbluth et al., JBJS AM, 2010 42y 86y 2 cases Twisting injury of the foot during walking (both cases) No Closed reduction and casting for 6 weeks Good
Brison et al., BMJ Case Rep, 2011 24y Plantar flexion and inversion injury while climbing out of his car No Closed reduction and casting under anesthesia Good (returned to his pre-injury functional status)
Pesce et al., J Emergency Med, 2011 37y Inversion injury during military training exercise No Closed reduction and splinting under sedation Good
McKead et al., BMJ Case Rep, 2015 18y Inversion injury playing football Non displaced fracture of the neck of the talus Closed reduction and casting under general anesthesia for 6 weeks Good

In our case the medial subtalar dislocation was secondary to a very low-energy injury and a good result was obtained with conservative treatment after a prompt reduction. This suggests that an immediate reduction under sedation is crucial to avoid soft tissue and neurovascular complications. The mechanism of injury is an important factor in predicting the final result because low-energy trauma usually does not produce long-term morbidity in these injuries [12,20]. However, even in uncomplicated cases, after reduction, it is important to exclude occult fractures by a CT scan, as suggested by other authors [[18], [19], [20]]. The time of immobilization in uncomplicated medial subtalar dislocation is still a matter of controversy [12]. In our case we immobilized the limb with a short leg cast for four weeks to minimize joint stiffness and to facilitate the rehabilitation. At final follow-up, tibiotalar and subtalar range of motion were comparable to the contralateral side.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we believe that subtalar dislocations caused by low-energy trauma generally do not produce long-term morbidity in contrast to those caused by high energy injuries. Prompt reduction appears to be very important to minimize soft tissues and neurovascular complications and a CT scan is recommended to identify occult fractures. Conservative management seems to be the treatment of choice, however, since we report a single patient, further case analysis are needed to make solid conclusions.

Funding

No funds were received in support of this study.

Ethical approval

The study was notified to the ethical committee of our hospital.; it does not need a specific ethical approval.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Vincenzo De Luna: conceptualization, writing, original draft

Alessandro Caterini: writing

Lidio Petrungaro: investigation

Marta Barosso: investigation

Fernando De Maio: writing, review & editing

Pasquale Farsetti: supervision

Guarantor

Prof. Pasquale Farsetti.

Declaration of competing interest

We certify that no benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related to the subject of this article.

References

  • 1.Judey P. Observation of a metatarsal dislocation. Bull. Fac. Med. 1811;11:81–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Defaurest P. Lateral dislocation of the foot, complicated the exit of the talus through the capsule and torn integument. J. Med. Chir. Phar. 1811;22:348–355. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Farsetti P., Dragoni M., Ippolito E. Tibiofibular torsion in congenital clubfoot. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 2012;21:47–51. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e32834d4dc3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Farsetti P., De Maio F., Russolillo L., Ippolito E. CT study on the effect of different treatment protocols for clubfoot pathology. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009;467:1243–1249. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0699-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Perugia D., Basile A., Massoni C., Gumina S., Rossi F., Ferretti A. Conservative treatment of subtalar dislocations. Int. Orthop. 2002;26:56–60. doi: 10.1007/s002640100296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Horning J., Di Preto J. Subtalar dislocation. Orthopaedics. 2009;32:904–908. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20091020-17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.De Lee J.C., Curtis R. Subtalar dislocation of the foot. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1982;64:433–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bibbo C., Anderson R.B., Davis W.H. Injury characteristics and the clinical outcome of subtalar dislocations: a clinical and radiographic analysis of 25 cases. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:158–163. doi: 10.1177/107110070302400210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Flippin M., Fallat L.M. Open talar neck fracture with medial subtalar joint dislocation: a case report. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;58:392–397. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zimmer T.J., Johnson K.A. Subtalar dislocations. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1989;238:190–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Agha RA, Franchi T, Sohrabi C, Mathew G, for the SCARE Group. The SCARE 2020 guideline: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines, Int. J. Surg. 2020; 84: 226–230. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 12.Lasanianos N.G., Lyras D.N., Mouzopoulos G., Tsutseos N., Garnavos C. Early mobilization after uncomplicated medial subtalar dislocation provides successful functional results. J. Orthop. Traumatol. 2011;12:37–43. doi: 10.1007/s10195-011-0126-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Camarda L., Abruzzese A., La Gattuda A., Lentini R., D’Arienzo M. Results of closed subtalar dislocations. Musculoskelet. Surg. 2016;100:63–69. doi: 10.1007/s12306-015-0380-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ruhlmann F., Poujardieu C., Vernois J., Gayet L.E. Isolated acute traumatic subtalar dislocations: review of 13 cases at a mean follow-up of 6 years and literature review. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56:201–207. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.01.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Byrd Z.O., Ebraheim M., Weston J.T., Liu J., Ebraheim N.A. Isolated subtalar dislocation. Orthopaedics. 2013;36:714–720. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130821-09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jungbluth P., Wild M., Hakimi M., Gehrmann S., Djurisic M., Windolf J., Muhr G., Kӓlicke T. Isolated subtalar dislocation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2010;92:890–894. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bryson D., Khan Z., Aujla R., Bromage J.D. A near miss: an uncommon injury following a common mechanism. BMJ Case Rep. 2011 Aug 4;2011 doi: 10.1136/bcr.04.2011.4086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pesce D., Wethern J., Patel P. Rare case of medial subtalar dislocation from a low-velocity mechanism. J. Emerg. Med. 2011;41:121–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.04.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mc Keag P., Lyske J., Reaney J., Thompson N. Subtalar dislocation secondary to a low energy injury. BMJ Case Rep. 2015 Feb 3;2015 doi: 10.1136/bcr-2014-208828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Giannoulis D., Papadopoulos D.V., Lykissas M.G., Koulouvaris P., Gkiatas I., Mavrodontidis A. Subtalar dislocation without associated fractures: case report and review of literature. World J. Orthop. 2015;6:374–379. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i3.374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Surgery Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES