Abstract
Background
The application of radiotherapy (RT) in pancreatic cancer remains controversial.
Aim
The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy (neoadjuvant and adjuvant radiotherapy) for resectable I/II pancreatic cancer.
Methods
Fourteen thousand nine hundred seventy-seven patients with pancreatic cancer were identified from SEER database from 2004 to 2015. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors including RT on overall survival. Overall survival and overall mortality among the different groups were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Gray’s test.
Results
Patients were divided into groups according to whether they received radiotherapy or not. The median survival time of all 14,977 patients without RT was 20 months, neoadjuvant RT was 24 months and adjuvant RT was 23 months (p < 0.0001). Median survival time of 2089 stage I patients without RT was 56 months, significantly longer than those with RT regardless of neoadjuvant or adjuvant RT (no RT: 56 months vs adjuvant RT: 37 months vs neoadjuvant RT: 27 months, P = 0.0039). Median survival time of 12,888 stage II patients with neoadjuvant RT was 24 months, adjuvant RT 22 months, significantly prolonged than those without radiotherapy (neoadjuvant RT: 24 months vs adjuvant RT: 22 months vs no RT: 17 months, P<0.0001). Neoadjuvant RT (HR = 1.434, P = 0.023, 95% CI: 1.051–1.957) was independent risk factors for prognosis of stage I patients, and adjuvant RT (HR = 0.904, P < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.861–0.950) predicted better outcomes for prognosis of stage II patients by multivariate analysis. The risk of cancer-related death caused by neoadjuvant RT in stage I and no-RT in stage II patients were significantly higher.
Conclusions
The study identified a significant survival advantage for the use of adjuvant RT over surgery alone or neoadjuvant RT in treating stage II pancreatic cancer. RT was not associated with survival benifit in stage I patients.
Keywords: Radiotherapy, Pancreatic cancer, SEER database, Survival analysis, Overall mortality
Introduction
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is an extremely malignant tumor with poor outcomes. The 5-year survival is as low as 2–9% [1–3]. The incidence rate of pancreatic cancer is increasing year by year [4], and it has been estimated to rise from the fourth cause of cancer-related deaths to the second major cause of cancer-related death in the United States [5].
Surgery remains the only curative treatment for PC. However, patients with PC usually present late period and only 20% of them have a chance of undergoing surgery when diagnosed [6]. Even in resectable patients who received surgery treatment, the prognosis was not very satisfactory. Adjuvant treatment is recommended in resected pancreatic cancer with PT1–4/N0-1M0 who undergo an R0/R1 resection to reduce the recurrence rate. In the past decades, owing to the chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) technology development, for patients who can successfully receive surgical resection, the 5-year survival rate after adjuvant treatment accounts for 27% [7].
Chemoradiation technology has been used for resectable PC. In theory, the goal of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for PC is to purify vascular boundary, increase the possibility of negative resection at the margin and prolong survival of early treatment of micrometastatic disease. Postoperative radiotherapy can provide sufficient local control to prevent or delay the local lesions progression, and postoperative chemotherapy can reduce the recurrence rate. However, in fact, the effect of radiotherapy on the prognosis of resectable PC is controversial.
Results from ESPAC-1 trial revealed that postoperative chemoradiotherapy may not be necessary or even harmful [8]. But the conclusion is controversial due to the lack of quality control of radiation treatment. In an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase III trial [9], 132 resected patients with R0/R1 received either chemoradiotherapy group or chemotherapy group, median survival time were 26.5 and 28.5 months, respectively(P > 0.05). The results indicated chemoradiotherapy did not improve the survival compared with chemotherapy. A meta-analysis [10] included five randomised controlled trials of adjuvant treatment in pancreatic adenocarcinoma 939 patients, and the results showed chemoradiation is not effective adjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer.
In contrast, other studies obtained different conclusions about the effect of radiotherapy. In the GERCOR phase II study [11], 90 patients after R0 resection of pancreatic head cancer were randomly divided into four gemcitabine treatment cycles or two gemcitabine cycles followed by gemcitabine with concurrent radiation weekly(50.4Gy/28f), the results showed median disease-free survival (DFS) was 12 months in the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy group and 11 months in the chemotherapy alone group. First local recurrence was notably lower in the chemoradiotherapy group (11% v 24%).
The contradiction of the conclusions from different studies leads to the lack of clear guidelines for the application of radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer. This retrospective study was based on a large-scale population database to evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy (neoadjuvant and adjuvant radiotherapy) for resectable I/II PC.
Methods
SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database of the National Cancer Institute is an important resource for population-based oncology research, documenting the information of cancer patients in some states in the United States for 40 years, with information on the diagnosis, treatment and survival data of millions of confirmed cancer patients. The number of SEER registration stations has now been expanded to eighteen.
The study extracted data using SEER*stat 8.3.6 software. Permission to access the custom data file in the SEER program was obtained and the reference number was 10,016-Nov2019. All study variables were obtained directly from the SEER database. This study was approved by Ethics Committee of Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University.
We extracted pancreatic cancer patients’ records data registered in SEER database from 2004 to 2015 and patients who accord with the following criteria were included in the study: (1) Adults aged ≥18; (2) Pathologically confirmed malignant tumor originated from pancreatic duct epithelium; (3) Patients who diagnosed as stage I/II pancreatic cancer according to the American Joint Committe on cancer (AJCC) staging manual (Stage I—T1: localized within the pancreas, with maximum diameter ≤ 2 cm or T2: localized within the pancreas, with a maximum diameter > 2 cm; N0: no regional lymph node metastasis; M0: no distant metastasis. Stage II—T3: extends beyond the pancreas but not involving the celiac axis or superior mesenteric artery; N0 and M0 or T1-T3/N1: regional lymph node metastasis and M0); (4) patients who received surgical resection; (5) Complete radiotherapy information record (including neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT and non-RT). (6) Survival time ≥ 1 month. Figure 1 displayed the cohort identification process.
Fig. 1.
Flow chart showed selection of PC patients registered in SEER from 2004 to 2015 in this study
The primary outcome of the study was overall survival. Overall survival was determined from the beginning of the diagnosis until death of any cause or until the last follow-up date. Secondary endpoints were cancer-related mortality. Variables extracted from the SEER database included the following: age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, sex, race recode, primary site, ICD-O-3 Hist/behave, pathological grade, derived AJCC T, RX Summ-Surg Prim Site, radiation sequence with surgery, chemotherapy recode, survival months, vital status recode, cause of death (COD) to site recode, Cause-specific death classification, Other cause of death classification.
All statistical calculations were carried out using SPSS 19.0 software, R (version 3.6.3) and figures were drawn by Graphpad Prism 7.0 and R. All variables have been converted to category variables for better analysis. The clinical characteristics baseline among different groups were compared by Chi-square test. The overall survival analysis was estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by the Log-Rank method. The Hazard’s ratio was determined by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. Secondary endpoint was compared using competitive risk analysis. Competition risk analysis was conducted by Gray’s test using “cmprsk” and “survival” packages in R. All statistical tests were two-sided, and P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
The correlation between clinical parameters and RT in pancreatic cancer patients
From the year 2004 until the end of the year 2015, 164,035 patients with pancreatic cancer were enrolled in SEER database. In total, there were 2089 stage I patients and 12,888 stage II patients underwent surgery operation were enrolled in this study. The median age at diagnosis was 67 years old (age ranging from 18 to 97). Among stage I patients, 88 patients received neoadjuvant RT and 388 patients received adjuvant RT. The proportion of patients receiving radiotherapy differed in year of diagnosis, sex, race, primary site, pathological grade, T stage and whether received chemotherapy.
Five hundred forty-four patients received neoadjuvant RT and 4200 patients received adjuvant RT in stage II patients. The composition ratio of radiation therapy in stage II patients differed in age, year of diagnosis, race, primary site, pathological grade, T stage, N stage, whether received chemotherapy and surgical methods (P < 0.05). The characteristics of all patients are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
The correlation between clinical parameters and RT use
| Clinical parameters | Stage I | Stage II | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No RT | Neoadjuvant RT | adjuvant RT | P | No RT | Neoadjuvant RT | adjuvant RT | P | |
| Age | 0.626 | <0.001 | ||||||
| < 60 | 471(29.2) | 26(29.5) | 123(31.7) | 1822(22.4) | 193(35.5) | 1297(30.9) | ||
| ≥ 60 | 1142(70.8) | 62(70.5) | 265(68.3) | 6322(77.6) | 351(64.5) | 2903(69.1) | ||
| Year of diagnosis | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 2004–2009 | 737(45.7) | 34(38.6) | 235(60.6) | 3226(39.6) | 158(29.0) | 2101(50.0) | ||
| 2010–2015 | 876(54.3) | 54(61.4) | 153(39.4) | 4918(60.4) | 386(71.0) | 2099(50.0) | ||
| Sex | 0.002 | 0.133 | ||||||
| Female | 916(56.8) | 44(50.0) | 183(47.2) | 4038(49.6) | 278(51.1) | 2012(47.9) | ||
| Male | 697(43.2) | 44(50.0) | 205(52.8) | 4106(50.4) | 266(48.9) | 2188(52.1) | ||
| Race | 0.012 | 0.009 | ||||||
| Black | 161(10.0) | 12(13.6) | 58(14.9) | 751(9.2) | 59(10.8) | 394(9.4) | ||
| White | 1282(79.5) | 72(81.8) | 300(77.3) | 6773(83.2) | 466(85.7) | 3492(83.1) | ||
| Other | 170(10.5) | 4(4.5) | 30(7.7) | 620(7.6) | 19(3.5) | 314(7.5) | ||
| Primary tumor Site | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||||
| Head | 880(54.6) | 65(73.9) | 251(64.7) | 6285(77.2) | 461(84.7) | 3314(78.9) | ||
| Body | 233(14.4) | 11(12.5) | 56(14.4) | 512(6.3) | 36(6.6) | 270(6.4) | ||
| tail | 381(23.6) | 6(6.8) | 54(13.9) | 904(11.1) | 22(4.0) | 398(9.5) | ||
| Pancreatic duct | 26(1.6) | 1(1.1) | 7(1.8) | 100(1.2) | 1(0.2) | 44(1.0) | ||
| Overlapping | 93(5.8) | 5(5.7) | 20(5.2) | 343(4.2) | 24(4.4) | 174(4.1) | ||
| Pathological grade | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||||
| I | 315(19.5) | 12(13.6) | 57(14.7) | 768(9.4) | 42(7.7) | 370(8.8) | ||
| II | 608(37.7) | 22(25.0) | 202(52.1) | 3781(46.4) | 166(30.5) | 2094(49.9) | ||
| III | 272(16.9) | 18(20.5) | 89(22.9) | 2878(35.3) | 106(19.5) | 1450(34.5) | ||
| IV | 29(1.8) | 0(0) | 5(1.3) | 112(1.4) | 8(1.5) | 53(1.3) | ||
| Unknown | 389(24.1) | 36(40.9) | 35(9.0) | 605(7.4) | 222(40.8) | 233(5.5) | ||
| T | <0.001 | 0.002 | ||||||
| 1 | 636(39.4) | 20(22.7) | 115(29.6) | 157(1.9) | 2(0.4) | 75(1.8) | ||
| 2 | 977(60.6) | 68(77.3) | 273(70.4) | 582(7.1) | 23(4.2) | 325(7.7) | ||
| 3 | – | – | – | 7405(90.9) | 519(95.4) | 3800(90.5) | ||
| N | – | <0.001 | ||||||
| 0 | – | – | – | 2384(29.3) | 256(47.1) | 1025(24.4) | ||
| 1 | – | – | – | 5760(70.7) | 288(52.9) | 3175(75.6) | ||
| Chemotherapy | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||||
| No | 1041(64.5) | 3(3.4) | 28(7.2) | 3656(44.9) | 8(1.5) | 215(5.1) | ||
| Yes | 572(35.5) | 85(96.6) | 360(92.8) | 4488(55.1) | 536(98.5) | 3985(94.9) | ||
| Surgical procedures | 0.082 | 0.010 | ||||||
| Local excision of tumor | 12(0.7) | 1(1,1) | 2(0.5) | 27(0.3) | 5(0.9) | 19(0.5) | ||
| Pancreatectomy | 1411(87.5) | 67(76.1) | 341(87.9) | 6916(84.9) | 447(82.2) | 3569(85.0) | ||
| Extended | 154(9.5) | 15(17.0) | 34(8.8) | 1097(13.5) | 78(14.3) | 577(13.7) | ||
| Unknown | 36(2.2) | 5(5.7) | 11(2.8) | 104(1.3) | 14(2.6) | 35(0.8) | ||
Abbreviations: RT Radiotherapy. Note: Pathological grade I, Well differentiated; II, Moderately differentiated; III, Poorly differentiated; IV, Undifferentiated; anaplastic. Pancreatectomy: partial pancreatectomy, local or partial pancreatectomy and duodenectomy with/without distal/partial gastrectomy, total pancreatectomy; Extended: total pancreatectomy and subtotal gastrectomy or duodenectomy, extended pancreatoduodenectomy
Overall survival analysis of stage I/II pancreatic cancer patients
Fourteen thousand nine hundred seventy-seven patients with pancreatic cancer were divided into three groups according to whether they received RT or not. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis showed that the median survival time of patients without RT was 20 months, neoadjuvant RT was 24 months and adjuvant RT was 23 months (p < 0.0001, Fig. 2a). We performed subgroup analysis according to different stages.
Fig. 2.
Overall survival of patients stratified by RT. a Overall survival of 14,977 cases of stage I/II patients treated without RT (n = 9757) versus patients treated with neoadjuvant RT (n = 632) versus patients treated with adjuvant RT (n = 4588) (P < 0.0001). b Plot of overall survival for 2089 stage I patients stratified by RT use. Patients not received RT (n = 1613) versus patients received neoadjuvant RT (n = 88) versus patients treated with adjuvant RT (n = 388) (P = 0.0039). c Plot of overall survival for 12,888 stage II patients stratified by RT use. Patients not received RT (n = 8144) versus patients received neoadjuvant RT (n = 544) versus patients treated with adjuvant RT (n = 4200) (P < 0.0001)
Two thousand eighty-nine cases of stage I pancreatic cancer patients were divided into three groups by radiotherapy. Comparison of the median survival time differences was conducted in the three groups. Median survival time of patients without RT was 56 months, significantly longer than the median survival time of those with RT regardless of neoadjuvant or adjuvant RT (no RT: 56 months vs adjuvant RT: 37 months vs neoadjuvant RT: 27 months, P = 0.0039, Fig. 2b). Similarly, all 12,888 patients with stage II pancreatic cancer were divided into three groups according to whether they received radiotherapy or not. Median survival time of patients with neoadjuvant RT was 24 months, adjuvant RT 22 months, significantly prolonged than the median survival time of those without radiotherapy (neoadjuvant RT: 24 months vs adjuvant RT: 22 months vs no RT: 17 months, P<0.0001, Fig. 2c).
In addition, only a small number of surgically treated patients received radiotherapy alone, the number of patients who underwent radiotherapy alone for neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy were only 11 and 243 patients, respectively. Therefore, we also analyzed whether the addition of radiotherapy can improve the survival of surgically treated patients in the chemotherapy group. Among stage I patients, 1017 patients received chemotherapy. The results showed that the addition of radiotherapy did not improve the prognosis of patients (neoadjuvant RT: 27 months vs adjuvant RT: 40 months vs no RT: 52 months, P = 0.008, Fig. 3a). Nine thousand nine cases received chemotherapy in stage II patients, the results showed median survival time was 24 months in neoadjuvant RT group, 22 months in adjuvant RT group and 21 months in chemotherapy alone group(P = 0.0002, Fig. 3b). The median survival time of patients receiving RT (neoadjuvant RT or advanced RT) was longer than those without RT.
Fig. 3.
Overall survival of chemotherapy patients stratified by RT. a Plot of overall survival for 1017 stage I patients received chemotherapy stratified by RT use. Patients not received RT (n = 572) versus patients received neoadjuvant RT (n = 85) versus patients treated with adjuvant RT (n = 360) (P = 0.008). b Plot of overall survival for 9009 stage II patients stratified by RT use. Patients not received RT (n = 4488) versus patients received neoadjuvant RT (n = 536) versus patients treated with adjuvant RT (n = 3985) (P = 0.0002)
Univariate analysis of clinical features affecting the prognosis
Univariate survival analysis was separately performed for stage I/II patients. For stage I patients, the unadjusted protective factor was tumor located in tail of pancreas. Radiotherapy including age (≥ 60 years old), male, pathology with worse differentiation, higher T stage were adverse diagnostic factors.
For patients with stage II pancreatic cancer, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer after 2010 were the advantageous factors for the prognosis of patients. The harmful factors for the prognosis included age (≥ 60 years old), male, pathology with worse differentiation, higher T and higher N stage. The results are shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Univariate analysis of clinical features affecting the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients
| Clinical parameters | Stage I | Stage II | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95%CI | P | HR | 95%CI | P | |
| Age | ||||||
| < 60 | Ref | Ref | ||||
| ≥ 60 | 2.063 | 1.772–2.401 | <0.001 | 1.263 | 1.204–1.324 | <0.001 |
| Year of diagnosis | ||||||
| 2004–2009 | Ref | Ref | ||||
| 2010–2015 | 0.897 | 0.785–1.024 | 0.109 | 0.866 | 0.830–0.902 | <0.001 |
| Sex | ||||||
| Female | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Male | 1.279 | 1.131–1.446 | <0.001 | 1.042 | 1.000–1.085 | 0.049 |
| Race | ||||||
| Black | Ref | Ref | ||||
| White | 1.077 | 0.880–1.319 | 0.470 | 0.959 | 0.895–1.028 | 0.242 |
| Other | 0.760 | 0.567–1.020 | 0.067 | 0.911 | 0.823–1.008 | 0.072 |
| Primary tumor Site | ||||||
| Head | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Body | 0.831 | 0.690–1.002 | 0.052 | 0.975 | 0.894–1.063 | 0.568 |
| tail | 0.606 | 0.512–0.718 | <0.001 | 0.909 | 0.848–0.974 | 0.007 |
| Pancreatic duct | 0.856 | 0.536–1.368 | 0.517 | 0.876 | 0.725–1.058 | 0.169 |
| Overlapping | 0.773 | 0.583–1.025 | 0.074 | 1.072 | 0.968–1.188 | 0.179 |
| Pathological grade | ||||||
| I | Ref | Ref | ||||
| II | 1.811 | 1.499–2.187 | <0.001 | 1.440 | 1.331–1.559 | <0.001 |
| III | 2.570 | 2.085–3.168 | <0.001 | 1.902 | 1.754–2.061 | <0.001 |
| IV | 1.746 | 1.056–2.889 | 0.030 | 1.684 | 1.394–2.033 | <0.001 |
| Unknown | 1.039 | 0.829–1.303 | 0.739 | 1.147 | 1.031–1.276 | 0.012 |
| T | ||||||
| 1 | Ref | Ref | ||||
| 2 | 1.371 | 1.201–1.564 | <0.001 | 1.315 | 1.113–1.554 | 0.001 |
| 3 | – | 1.295 | 1.113–1.506 | 0.001 | ||
| N | ||||||
| 0 | – | Ref | ||||
| 1 | – | 1.446 | 1.380–1.516 | <0.001 | ||
| Chemotherapy | ||||||
| No | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Yes | 1.056 | 0.933–1.194 | 0.389 | 0.637 | 0.610–0.666 | <0.001 |
| Surgical procedures | ||||||
| Local excision of tumor | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Pancreatectomy | 0.900 | 0.428–1.894 | 0.782 | 0.752 | 0.551–1.026 | 0.072 |
| Extended | 0.962 | 0.447–2.071 | 0.922 | 0.820 | 0.598–1.123 | 0.215 |
| Unknown | 1.212 | 0.529–2.775 | 0.650 | 0.791 | 0.550–1.135 | 0.203 |
| Radiotherapy | ||||||
| No | Ref | Ref | ||||
| neoadjuvant RT | 1.468 | 1.099–1.960 | 0.009 | 0.690 | 0.617–0.770 | <0.001 |
| adjuvant RT | 1.193 | 1.028–1.384 | 0.020 | 0.790 | 0.756–0.825 | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: RT Radiotherapy. Note: Pathological grade I, Well differentiated; II, Moderately differentiated; III, Poorly differentiated; IV, Undifferentiated; anaplastic. Pancreatectomy: partial pancreatectomy, local or partial pancreatectomy and duodenectomy with/without distal/partial gastrectomy, total pancreatectomy; Extended: total pancreatectomy and subtotal gastrectomy or duodenectomy, extended pancreatoduodenectomy
Multivariate analysis of clinical features affecting the prognosis
Multivariate survival analysis of stage I pancreatic cancer showed that neoadjuvant RT (HR = 1.434, P = 0.023, 95% CI: 1.051–1.957), age (≥60 years old), male, pathology with worse differentiation, higher T stage were independent risk factors for prognosis, indicating a shorter survival period. Chemotherapy, tumor located in body and tail of pancreas, non-white/black Americans were favorable prognostic factors and related to longer survival period.
Also, we conducted multivariate survival analysis for stage II pancreatic cancer patients. Results showed that adjuvant RT (HR = 0.904, P < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.861–0.950) including chemotherapy, expanded surgical procedure, pancreatic duct tumors, diagnosed pancreatic cancer after 2010 and non-black Americans predicted better outcomes. On the contrary, age (≥60 years old), male, pathology with worse differentiation, higher T and N stage predicted worse outcomes, which means shorter survival time. Multivariate analysis results are shown in Table 3.
Table 3.
Multivariate analysis of clinical features affecting the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients
| Clinical parameters | Stage I | Stage II | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95%CI | P | HR | 95%CI | P | |
| Age | ||||||
| < 60 | Ref | Ref | ||||
| ≥ 60 | 1.894 | 1.621–2.213 | <0.001 | 1.220 | 1.162–1.280 | <0.001 |
| Year of diagnosis | ||||||
| 2004–2009 | Ref | Ref | ||||
| 2010–2015 | 0.943 | 0.823–1.080 | 0.394 | 0.887 | 0.850–0.926 | <0.001 |
| Sex | ||||||
| Female | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Male | 1.172 | 1.035–1.327 | 0.012 | 1.055 | 1.013–1.100 | 0.010 |
| Race | ||||||
| Black | Ref | Ref | ||||
| White | 0.971 | 0.790–1.192 | 0.776 | 0.907 | 0.846–0.973 | 0.006 |
| Other | 0.705 | 0.524–0.949 | 0.021 | 0.889 | 0.802–0.985 | 0.024 |
| Primary tumor Site | ||||||
| Head | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Body | 0.820 | 0.679–0.989 | 0.038 | 1.049 | 0.961–1.145 | 0.281 |
| tail | 0.698 | 0.587–0.830 | <0.001 | 0.953 | 0.888–1.023 | 0.181 |
| Pancreatic duct | 1.150 | 0.717–1.845 | 0.563 | 0.789 | 0.653–0.954 | 0.014 |
| Overlapping | 0.772 | 0.581–1.027 | 0.076 | 1.088 | 0.982–1.205 | 0.107 |
| Pathological grade | ||||||
| I | Ref | Ref | ||||
| II | 1.719 | 1.418–2.084 | <0.001 | 1.466 | 1.354–1.587 | <0.001 |
| III | 2.318 | 1.867–2.878 | <0.001 | 1.947 | 1.796–2.112 | <0.001 |
| IV | 1.861 | 1.121–3.089 | 0.016 | 1.807 | 1.495–2.183 | <0.001 |
| Unknown | 1.010 | 0.803–1.268 | 0.935 | 1.273 | 1.142–1.419 | <0.001 |
| T | ||||||
| 1 | Ref | Ref | ||||
| 2 | 1.412 | 1.234–1.615 | 0.000 | 1.274 | 1.078–1.506 | 0.004 |
| 3 | – | 1.450 | 1.245–1.690 | <0.001 | ||
| N | ||||||
| 0 | – | Ref | ||||
| 1 | – | 1.543 | 1.469–1.621 | <0.001 | ||
| Chemotherapy | ||||||
| No | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Yes | 0.827 | 0.727–0.940 | 0.004 | 0.628 | 0.598–0.660 | <0.001 |
| Surgical procedures | ||||||
| Local excision of tumor | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Pancreatectomy | 0.677 | 0.320–1.433 | 0.308 | 0.647 | 0.474–0.884 | 0.006 |
| Extended | 0.642 | 0.296–1.393 | 0.263 | 0.702 | 0.512–0.963 | 0.028 |
| Unknown | 1.208 | 0.524–2.784 | 0.657 | 0.713 | 0.496–1.025 | 0.068 |
| Radiotherapy | ||||||
| No | Ref | Ref | ||||
| neoadjuvant RT | 1.434 | 1.051–1.957 | 0.023 | 0.975 | 0.868–1.095 | 0.668 |
| adjuvant RT | 1.095 | 0.918–1.307 | 0.314 | 0.904 | 0.861–0.950 | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: RT Radiotherapy. Note: Pathological grade I, Well differentiated; II, Moderately differentiated; III, Poorly differentiated; IV, Undifferentiated; anaplastic. Pancreatectomy: partial pancreatectomy, local or partial pancreatectomy and duodenectomy with/without distal/partial gastrectomy, total pancreatectomy; Extended: total pancreatectomy and subtotal gastrectomy or duodenectomy, extended pancreatoduodenectomy
Competitive risk analysis for cancer-related death of I/II pancreatic cancer patients
The causes of death were divided into cancer-related death and non-cancer-related death. We analyzed the death outcomes by competitive risk model. The results showed that the 1-, 3-, and 5-year cancer-related mortality rate in stage I patients treated with neoadjuvant RT were 13.98%, 52.33 and 63.58% respectively. In adjuvant RT group, the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year cancer-related mortality rates were 10.95, 43.16 and 48.94%, nevertheless these rates decreased to 11.54, 32.02 and 39.51% respectively in patients without radiotherapy. The risk of cancer-related death caused by neoadjuvant RT was significantly higher than adjuvant RT and no-RT (p < 0.0001; Fig. 4a) .
Fig. 4.
Competitive risk analysis for cancer-related death of patients stratified by RT. a Cancer-related death of stage I patients caused by RT use or not. (P < 0.0001). b Cancer-related death of patients stage II patients caused by RT. (P < 0.0001)
The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year cancer-related mortality rates in patients with stage II pancreatic cancer without radiotherapy were 32.70, 66.78 and 74.16% respectively, In patients who received adjuvant RT, the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year cancer-related mortality rates were 21.16%, 63.47 and 73.38%. The rates were 17.57%, 55.30 and 68.49% in neoadjuvant RT group. The results showed the cancer-related death of II stage patients without radiotherapy was significantly higher than that of patients received radiotherapy(P < 0.0001; Fig. 4b).
Discussion
Although PC in early stage can be treated surgically, the complete resection rate is low due to anatomical position of pancreas complexity, the recurrence rate can up to 80% [12]. Previous studies have confirmed compared with surgery treatment only, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy has positive effect by preventing or delaying tumor recurrence and improving the long-term survival rate. At 2008 ASCO annual meeting, the CONKO-001 study reported by the investigator showed that adjuvant chemotherapy benefits patients’ survival after pancreatic cancer surgery. In CONKO-001 phase III clinical trial [13, 14], 354 patients with PC after resection were randomly divided into adjuvant gemcitabine (GEM) treatment group or observation group. The results showed GEM adjuvant chemotherapy improved Disease-free Survival (DFS) (13.4 months vs 6.9 months, P < 0.001). The long-term follow-up results showed that the total survival time of patients in GEM group was significantly superior than observation group (the mOS was 22.8 months vs 20.2 months, the 5-year survival rate was 20.7% vs 10.4%, and the 10-year survival rate was 12.2% vs 7.7%, respectively, p < 0.01). The study supported conclusion that adjuvant chemotherapy compared with observation alone resulted in increased overall survival. Before CONKO-001, adjuvant chemotherapy was not common for pancreatic cancer. In this study, we have included cases since 2004 for two reasons: First, in the SEER database, most of the cases after 2004 (including 2004) recorded AJCC stage, while only a small part of cases before 2004 recorded AJCC stage, our retrospective study included more cases in order to conclude more reliable conclusions. Second, among the cases we included, there were still 2304 patients who received chemotherapy between 2004 and 2007, and there may be a number of patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy or postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is not recorded in the SEER database). Our study also showed that chemotherapy is an independent protective factor for the prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Chemotherapy reduced the risk of death by 17.3% in patients with stage I and 37.2% in patients with stage II.
Adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary for resectable pancreatic cancer, but the role of radiotherapy remains controversial due to opposite conclusions drawn from different studies. The results of EROTC-40891 showed that there was no significant difference in survival rate and progression free survival rate between the chemoradiotherapy group and the observation group, and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy did not improve survival [7]. Results from ESPAC-1 trial identified adjuvant chemotherapy has significant survival benefits for patients with pancreatectomy, while adjuvant chemoradiotherapy has adverse effects on survival [8, 10, 15]. But other studies held the opposite conclusion. Since a randomized, prospective, multi-institutional Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group (GITSG) trial [16, 17] had supported postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy, subsequent clinical trials also demonstrated a fact chemoradiotherapy had survival advantage for resected patients. Results from a prospective database of 616 pancreatic cancer patients after resection of pancreatic cancer at Johns Hopkins Hospital suggested adjuvant chemoradiotherapy significantly improves survival when compared with patients observation alone [18]. The Mayo Clinic conducted a retrospective review of 466 patients who underwent R0 resection of pancreatic cancer, and found that overall survival was better in patients who received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy than those not received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Also, there were two large-scale population-based retrospective studies supported radiotherapy as an adjuvant treatment for localized pancreatic cancer. In 2008, Stessin et al. [19] analyzed 3885 cases of surgically resected stage I/II pancreatic cancer patients in SEER database from 1994 to 2003. Overall survival of patients receiving neoadjuvant RT was 23 months, while patients without RT was 12 months, and patients receiving adjuvant RT was 17 months. The analysis showed a survival benefit for the use of neoadjuvant RT in treating pancreatic cancer. In 2010, McDade et al. [20] analyzed 5676 cases of resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma in SEER database from 1988 to 2005. The median survival time (18 months) of patients with adjuvant radiotherapy was better than those without adjuvant radiotherapy (10 months, P < 0.0001). These studies have come to different conclusions presumably because of the patients included with different baseline characteristics, staging, treatment methods and doses.
Neoadjuvant radiotherapy alone was rarely used in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. First, pancreatic cancer represents highly resistant to radiation, the response rate to radiotherapy was low. Second, the pancreas is a retroperitoneal organ with a deep anatomic position, surrounded by important organs such as stomach, liver and other organs. The effect of radiotherapy is affected by many factors such as target area delineation, peristalsis of surrounding organs. Another barrier is the intolerance of surrounding organs to high dose radiotherapy, which leads to the radiation effect limitation. Furthermore, the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer may delay surgery, providing an opportunity for tumor metastasis that becomes unresectable. These barriers limited the application of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Our results displayed in the resectable pancreatic cancer, the number of patients receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy was small, only 88 (4.21%) in stage I and 544 (4.22%) in stage II patients.
Different from the studies of Stessin and McDade, we performed a subgroup analysis of resectable pancreatic cancer according to TNM staging. Dramatic differences are observed in radiotherapy effect on stage I and II pancreatic cancer patients. Our study showed that for stage I pancreatic cancer patients, KM analysis indicated the median survival time of patients with no radiotherapy was significantly longer than those with radiotherapy, and the median survival time of patients received neoadjuvant radiotherapy is the shortest (56 months with no RT vs 37 months with adjuvant RT vs 27 months with neoadjuvant RT, P = 0.0039, Fig. 2b). Even for patients received chemotherapy, the addition of radiotherapy use shortened survival time (Fig. 3a). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that neoadjuvant radiotherapy was an independent risk factor. The 1-, 3-and 5-year risk of cancer-related death of neoadjuvant radiotherapy was significantly higher than non-radiotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy. Similar to the previous study, Hazard et al. [21] analyzed 3008 pancreatic patients who underwent resection without distant metastasis from 1988 to 2002 in SEER database. Multivariate analysis showed that radiation therapy played a positive role in overall survival for patients who had direct extension beyond the pancreas and/or regional lymph node involvement (P < 0.01) but not for patients with T1-T2N0M0 disease (P > 0.05). It was necessary to unify the conditions for chemotherapy if the effects of radiotherapy were to be compared. While in SEER database, records of factors such as chemotherapy cycles, regimen and dose are not listed, only whether chemotherapy received or not was recorded. Therefore, due to the limitations of the records, we did not unify the conditions of chemotherapy. It is noteworthy that in our study, Among stage I patients received neoadjuvant radiotherapy, of whom 15 cases underwent total pancreatectomy and subtotal gastrectomy or duodenectomy/extended pancreatoduodenectomy. We speculated these 15 patients may have high-risk factors that require neoadjuvant chemotherapy to improve R0 resection rate, the characteristics of these patients may mean a worse prognosis, leading to the conclusion that neoadjuvant radiotherapy has a negative effect in stage I patients.
For patients with stage II pancreatic cancer, the effect of radiotherapy on survival was completely opposite. KM analysis indicated that radiotherapy prolonged the patients’ survival time, and the median survival of patients without radiotherapy is the shortest (17 months with no RT vs 22 months with adjuvant RT vs 24 months with neoadjuvant RT, P < 0.0001, Fig. 2c), similar results were obtained in the chemotherapy group (Fig. 3b). Cox analysis showed that adjuvant radiotherapy is an independent protective factor. Cancer-related death risk of no radiotherapy in 1-, 3-and 5-year was significantly higher than neoadjuvant and adjuvant radiotherapy. Our conclusion was consistent with Moody’s study. Moody et al. [22] analyzed the record of 3252 patients with pancreatic cancer after operation in SEER database, the results showed that radiotherapy could significantly improve the survival time of patients with stage II B (T1-T3N1). Because the sequence of chemotherapy was not recorded in SEER database, we had to analyze radiotherapy and chemotherapy separately. Our results demonstrated that the addition of adjuvant radiotherapy could prolong the survival period and reduce tumor related death for stage II pancreatic cancer.
Conclusion
By the analysis of resectable stage I/II pancreatic cancer subgroups, our results demonstrated a survival benefit for adjuvant RT use in resected stage II pancreatic cancer. RT especially neoadjuvant RT may be associated with a worse survival in stage I patients. Our study was based on a large national cancer registration database to provide more evidence for the application of radiotherapy in operable stage I/II pancreatic cancer patients. It is undeniable that our research was a retrospective study and bias was inevitable. We try to minimize this bias through a large data analysis and statistical method. Also, other important prognostic factors, including surgical margins, lymphovascular invasion, performance status and comorbidities of patients, and chemotherapy information (such as chemotherapy cycles, regimen and dose, whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy) did not included in the study due to unavailable in SEER database, we did not incorporate these factors into our study, which led to some limitations. So further prospective clinical trials are needed.
Acknowledgments
We would like to give special thanks to the efforts of the SEER tumor registry team.
Abbreviations
- SEER
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results
- RT
Radiotherapy
- OS
Overall survival
- PC
Pancreatic cancer
- AJCC
American Joint Committe on cancer
- COD
Cause of death
- KM
Kaplan-Meier
- DFS
Disease-free Survival
- GEM
Gemcitabine
- GITSG
Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group
Authors’ contributions
DH: Methodology, analysis, and writing original manuscript. FG: Data curation, analysis, and editing original manuscript. JL L: Data curation and editing original draft. HW: Methodology, analysis, writing-review and editing manuscript. QF: Research design, Supervision, review and editing manuscript. GW Y: Supervision, review and editing manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Funding
The research for this manuscript was not financially supported and none of the authors had any relevant financial relationships.
Availability of data and materials
Data files were downloaded directly from the SEER website.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
We signed the ‘Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program Data Use Agreement’ in accordance with the requirement of using SEER database. Therefore, we were permitted to obtain and download data from the SEER database. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University.
Consent for publication
No individual person’s data was applicable in this manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Qi Fu, Email: fuqi@bjzhongyi.com.
Guo Wang Yang, Email: yangguowang@bjzhongyi.com.
References
- 1.Luo J, Xiao L, Wu C, Zheng Y, Zhao N. The incidence and survival rate of population-based pancreatic cancer patients: Shanghai cancer registry 2004-2009. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.McGuigan A, Kelly P, Turkington RC, Jones C, Coleman HG, McCain RS. Pancreatic cancer: a review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(43):4846–4861. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i43.4846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7–34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Saad AM, Turk T, Al-Husseini MJ, Abdel-Rahman O. Trends in pancreatic adenocarcinoma incidence and mortality in the United States in the last four decades; a SEER-based study. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):688. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4610-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014;74(11):2913–2921. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vincent A, Herman J, Schulick R, Hruban RH, Goggins M. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2011;378(9791):607–620. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62307-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Smeenk HG, van Eijck CH, Hop WC, Erdmann J, Tran KC, Debois M, van Cutsem E, van Dekken H, Klinkenbijl JH, Jeekel J. Long-term survival and metastatic pattern of pancreatic and periampullary cancer after adjuvant chemoradiation or observation: long-term results of EORTC trial 40891. Ann Surg. 2007;246(5):734–740. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318156eef3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, Bassi C, Dunn JA, Hickey H, Beger H, Fernandez-Cruz L, Dervenis C, Lacaine F, Falconi M, Pederzoli P, Pap A, Spooner D, Kerr DJ, Büchler MW. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(12):1200–1210. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schmidt J, Abel U, Debus J, Harig S, Hoffmann K, Herrmann T, Bartsch D, Klein J, Mansmann U, Jäger D, Capussotti L, Kunz R, Büchler MW. Open-label, multicenter, randomized phase III trial of adjuvant chemoradiation plus interferon Alfa-2b versus fluorouracil and folinic acid for patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(33):4077–4083. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.2960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stocken DD, Buchler MW, Dervenis C, Bassi C, Jeekel H, Klinkenbijl JH, Bakkevold KE, Takada T, Amano H, Neoptolemos JP, et al. Meta-analysis of randomised adjuvant therapy trials for pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;92(8):1372–1381. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Van Laethem JL, Hammel P, Mornex F, Azria D, Van Tienhoven G, Vergauwe P, Peeters M, Polus M, Praet M, Mauer M, et al. Adjuvant gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy after curative resection for pancreatic cancer: a randomized EORTC-40013-22012/FFCD-9203/GERCOR phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(29):4450–4456. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.3446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Garrido-Laguna I, Hidalgo M. Pancreatic cancer: from state-of-the-art treatments to promising novel therapies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015;12(6):319–334. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rieß H, Neuhaus P, Post S, Gellert K, Ridwelski K, Schramm H. CONKO-001: final results of the randomized, prospective, multicenter phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus observation in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (PC) J Clin Oncol. 2008;19:45–46. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Oettle H, Neuhaus P, Hochhaus A, Hartmann JT, Gellert K, Ridwelski K, Niedergethmann M, Zülke C, Fahlke J, Arning MB, Sinn M, Hinke A, Riess H. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial. Jama. 2013;310(14):1473–1481. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.279201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Neoptolemos JP, Dunn JA, Stocken DD, Almond J, Link K, Beger H, Bassi C, Falconi M, Pederzoli P, Dervenis C, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England) 2001;358(9293):1576–1585. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06651-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kalser MH, Ellenberg SS. Pancreatic cancer. Adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection. Arch Surg (Chicago, Ill : 1960) 1985;120(8):899–903. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390320023003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Douglass HO Jr, Nava HR, Panahon A, Penetrante R, Goodwin P, Kalser MH, Livingstone A, Barkin JS, Raskin J, Benedetto P, et al. Further evidence of effective adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection of pancreatic cancer. Gastrointestinal tumor study group. Cancer. 1987;59(12):2006–10. 10.1002/1097-0142. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 18.Herman JM, Swartz MJ, Hsu CC, Winter J, Pawlik TM, Sugar E, Robinson R, Laheru DA, Jaffee E, Hruban RH, Campbell KA, Wolfgang CL, Asrari F, Donehower R, Hidalgo M, Diaz LA, Jr, Yeo C, Cameron JL, Schulick RD, Abrams R. Analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: results of a large, prospectively collected database at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(21):3503–3510. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.8469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stessin AM, Meyer JE, Sherr DL. Neoadjuvant radiation is associated with improved survival in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer: an analysis of data from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) registry. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72(4):1128–1133. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.McDade TP, Hill JS, Simons JP, Piperdi B, Ng SC, Zhou Z, Kadish SP, Fitzgerald TJ, Tseng JF. A national propensity-adjusted analysis of adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2010;116(13):3257–3266. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hazard L, Tward JD, Szabo A, Shrieve DC. Radiation therapy is associated with improved survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results of a study from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) registry data. Cancer. 2007;110(10):2191–2201. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Moody JS, Sawrie SM, Kozak KR, Plastaras JP, Howard G, Bonner JA. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer is associated with a survival benefit primarily in stage IIB patients. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(1):84–91. doi: 10.1007/s00535-008-2280-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data files were downloaded directly from the SEER website.