Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
letter
. 2021 Jan 28;185(4):1483–1488. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab023

Large-scale identification of ubiquitination sites on membrane-associated proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings

Lauren E Grubb 1,2,, Paul Derbyshire 2, Katherine E Dunning 1, Cyril Zipfel 2,3, Frank L H Menke 2,3, Jacqueline Monaghan 1,2,✉,3
PMCID: PMC8133621  PMID: 33585938

Abstract

An analysis of the identification of ubiquitination sites on proteins found at the cell periphery, including over 100 protein kinases.


Dear Editor,

Protein phosphorylation and ubiquitination are two of the most frequently observed post-translational modifications in eukaryotes, regulated by thousands of protein kinases, phosphatases, E3 ubiquitin ligases, and ubiquitin proteases. Although previous studies have catalogued several ubiquitinated proteins in plants (Walton et al., 2016), few ubiquitinated membrane-localized proteins have been identified. Receptor kinases (RKs) initiate phosphorylation signal relays that regulate plant growth, development, and stress responses. While the regulatory role of phosphorylation on protein kinase function is well-documented (Couto and Zipfel, 2016), considerably less is known about the significance of ubiquitination on protein kinases, even though their turnover is critical to signaling competence and cellular homeostasis. Here, we describe the large-scale identification of ubiquitination sites on Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) proteins associated with or integral to the plasma membrane, including over 100 protein kinases.

Proteins can be mono-, poly-, and/or multi-mono-ubiquitinated, each affecting protein function in different ways (Vierstra, 2012; Swatek and Komander, 2016). Dynamic interplay between phosphorylation and ubiquitination has been observed in several proteins involved in immune signaling (Mithoe and Menke, 2018), including layered post-translational regulation of the receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase (RLCK) BOTRYTIS-INDUCED KINASE1 (BIK1). BIK1 is directly phosphorylated and activated by several ligand-bound RKs (Couto and Zipfel, 2016), and can be dephosphorylated by the phosphatase PP2C38 (Couto et al., 2016). Precise control of BIK1 abundance is regulated by poly-ubiquitination by the E3 ligases PLANT U-BOX25 (PUB25) and PUB26 (Wang et al., 2018), as well as phosphorylation by CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE28 (CPK28; Monaghan et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2018) and the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase (MAP4K) SERINE/THREONINE KINASE1 (SIK1)/MAP4K4 (Zhang et al., 2018; Jiang et al., 2019). Most recently, it was shown that BIK1 is also mono-ubiquitinated by the E3 ligases RING-H2 FINGER A3A (RHA3A) and RHA3AB to regulate its activation and endocytosis (Ma et al., 2020).

Proteomics and mutagenesis approaches have resulted in the discovery of several phosphorylated residues on BIK1 (Liang and Zhou, 2018). To help us understand the role of ubiquitination on BIK1 function, we set out to identify in vivo ubiquitination sites on BIK1. We enriched for plasma membrane-localized BIK1 by isolating microsomal protein fractions from Col-0/pBIK1:BIK1-HA, cpk28-1/pBIK1:BIK1-HA, and CPK28-OE1/pBIK1:BIK1-HA genotypes, which express 100-fold higher levels of BIK1 and differentially accumulate BIK1 protein compared to wild-type (Monaghan et al., 2014). To increase protein abundance of nonintegral proteins and allow us to potentially capture immune-induced ubiquitination, proteasomal machinery was inhibited with 50 μM MG-132 an hour before treatment with water or 1 μM elf18 (an immunogenic peptide derived from bacterial EF-Tu; Zipfel et al., 2006). Microsomal protein fractions were digested with trypsin, and anti-K-ε-GG agarose beads (Udeshi et al., 2013) were used to enrich ubiquitinated peptides by affinity binding. Ubiquitinated lysines were identified based on a shift of ∼114 Da—the mass of two glycine remnants that remain covalently bound to lysines following trypsin digestion—using liquid chromatography followed by tandem mass spectrometry (Supplementary Methods). The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (Perez-Riverol et al., 2019) partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD021992 and 10.6019/PXD021992.

We filtered our data for peptides with the diGly ubiquitin remnant, setting a threshold Mascot ion score of >20 and required multiple spectra for each peptide. This resulted in the identification of a total of 916 ubiquitinated peptides on 450 proteins across several biological replicates with a peptide false discovery rate of 0.025 (Supplemental Table S1), and an additional 526 peptides on 398 proteins observed in single experiments (Supplemental Table S2). Included in these data were seven ubiquitinated lysines on BIK1 (Table 1 andFigure 1;Supplemental Tables S1–S2). Given our particular interest in BIK1, we manually inspected all spectra mapping to BIK1 and found an additional three sites (Figure 1;Supplemental Figure S1), altogether corroborating five of the ubiquitinated residues reported by (Ma et al., 2020) and revealing five novel ones (Figure 1). Thus, BIK1 is ubiquitinated on multiple surface-exposed lysines in vivo: three in the N-terminal variable domain (K31, K41, K61), seven in the canonical kinase domain (K95, K106, K155, K170, K186, K286, K337), and five in the C-terminal region (K358, K366, K369, K374, K388; Figure 1). Whether RHA3A/B and PUB25/26 compete for these sites or ubiquitinate distinct lysines remains to be tested experimentally, as does clarifying which E2 conjugating enzymes work with respective E3 ligases to catalyze these events (Turek et al., 2018). Furthermore, as the phospho-status of BIK1 has been shown to affect its regulation by both RHA3A/B and PUB25/26 (Wang et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2020), another challenge will be resolving the biochemical mechanisms underlying this interplay.

Table 1.

Ubiquitinated protein kinases identified in this study. Proteins matching the gene ontology term “kinase activity” were filtered from Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 and classified based on phylogenies presented by Shiu and Bleecker (2001, 2003). Residues that are only supported by a single observation (Supplementary Table S2) are indicated by an asterisk and should be interpreted with caution. Residues that were observed only after manual inspection of mass spectra matching BIK1 are indicated with two asterisks and shown in Supplementary Figure S1

Receptor-like protein kinases
Protein family Accession Protein name K-GG
SD-1 AT1G11300 EGM1 K514, K527
AT4G27300 SD1-1 K518*, K550*, K648
AT4G21380 ARK3/RK3/SD1-8 K661
AT1G11350 CBRLK1/RKS2 K528
AT1G61550 S-locus lectin protein kinase family protein K507
AT1G11330 RDA2 K529, K542
AT1G61380 LORE/SD1-29 K493, K506*
SD-2 AT2G19130 S-locus lectin protein kinase family protein K498*, K591
AT1G34300 Lectin protein kinase family protein K489*, K710
AT4G32300 SD2-5 K641*, K727
L-LEC AT4G28350 LecRK-VII.2 K339
AT3G53380 LecRK-VIII.1 K374
AT2G37710 RLK/LecRK-IV.1 K350*, K370
C-LEC AT1G52310 C-type lectin receptor kinase K265*, K278*, K292
CRK/DUF26 AT1G70520 CRK2 K379*
AT4G23180 CRK10/RLK4 K438*, K449
AT4G23190 CRK11/RLK3 K349, K366, K368, K400*, K451
AT4G23300 CRK22 K352, K369, K371, K381
AT4G05200 CRK25 K448, K507
AT4G11530 CRK34 K363, K399
AT4G04570 CRK40 K376*, K402
URK-II AT5G20050 URK-II family protein K199*, K156
CrRLK1L-1 AT5G54380 THE1 K480*, K526, K534, K560*, K657*, K753*
AT3G51550 FERONIA K530, K534, K549, K561, K672, K759, K771, K773, K781*, K843*
AT3G46290 HERK1 K479, K498, K501
AT1G30570 HERK2 K518
AT2G23200 CrRLK1L-1 family protein K710
AT5G38990 MDS1 K541, K554*, K646*
LRR-I AT1G51800 IOS1 K721
AT1G51890 LRR-Ia family protein K543*
AT2G37050 BSR050 K740
LRR-II AT4G33430 SERK3/BAK1 K339*
AT2G13800 SERK5/BAK8 K303
AT5G10290 LRR-II family protein K276, K314, K469
AT5G16000 NIK1 K320*
AT2G23950 CLERK K317
LRR-III AT3G17840 RLK902 K315, K336, K347
AT1G48480 RKL1 K353, K506
AT5G58300 LRR-III family protein K326*
AT2G26730 LRR-III family protein K293, K315*, K416
AT2G36570 PXC1 K319
AT3G08680 LRR-III family protein K407
AT5G16590 LRR1 K317
STRUBBELIG-receptor AT1G53730 SRF6 K392*
AT3G14350 SRF7 K322
AT4G22130 SRF8 K344*, K353
LRR-VI AT5G63410 LRR-VI family protein K397, K427
AT2G02780 LRR-VI family protein K403*
LRR-VII AT3G28040 LRR-VIIa family protein K742, K728
AT1G80870 LRR-VIIa family protein K89
LRR-VIII AT5G49760 HPCA K600*, K605, K625, K685*
AT3G14840 LIK1 K666, K677, K688*, K700, K774, K793, K808, K821, K963*
LRR-IX AT1G66150 TMK1 K640, K746
AT2G01820 TMK3 K601, K637*, K743, K812
AT3G23750 BARK1 K736*
LRR-X AT5G48380 BIR1 K354, K562
AT3G28450 BIR2 K290, K514
LRR-V AT5G42440 LRR-Xb family protein K109
AT2G01820 PSKR1 K757*
LRR-XI AT5G65700 BAM1 K785
AT3G49670 BAM2 K781, K914
AT1G28440 HSL1 K845, K957*
AT1G09970 RLK7/LRR XI-23 K689, K703*, K818, K904, K966*
AT2G33170 LRR XI family protein K835*
AT5G25930 LRR XI family protein K701*, K941*
AT1G72180 LRR XI family protein K704*
LRR-XII AT5G20480 EFR K999, K1004
AT5G46330 FLS2 K924, K940
LRR-XIII AT1G27190 BIR3 K339
AT1G31420 FEI1 K358
AT4G08850 MIK2/BSR850 K770, K788, K793, K803, K818
AT2G26330 ERECTA K668
LRR-XV AT3G02130 RPK2/TOAD2/CLI1 K1144
LRR-other AT2G31880 SOBIR1/EVR K640*
LysMa AT3G21630 CERK1 K452
LRK10L-1a AT1G25390 LRK10L4 K309
CRINKLY4-Like AT5G46080 Protein kinase superfamily protein K293
AT3G55950 CCR3 K514
RKF3-Like AT1G11050 Protein kinase superfamily protein K449
WAK-Like AT1G21250 WAK1/PRO25 K403, K425, K437
AT1G21270 WAK2 K420, K432, K668*
AT2G23450 WAKL family protein K653*
Phototropin AT3G45780 PHOT1/NPH1/RPT1 K526, K899
Cytoplasmic protein kinases
Protein family Accession Protein name K-GG
RLCK-V AT3G59110 RLCK-V family protein K206
RLCK-VII AT2G39660 BIK1 K31*,K41, K61, K155**, K337*, K358*, K366**, K369**, K374*, K388
AT2G17220 PBL32/KIN3 K99, K242, K347
AT5G13160 PBS1 K204
AT5G18610 PBL27 K201
AT5G03320 PBL40 K115*
RLCK-VIII AT1G06700 PTI1-1 K71
AT2G30740 PTI1-2 K38, K74
AT3G59350 PTI1-3 K116, K133
AT2G47060 PTI1-4 K46, K303*
AT3G17410 PTI1-7/CARK1 K89, K190, K299
RLCK-XII AT4G35230 BSK1 K85
AT4G00710 BSK3 K67, K481*
AT5G59010 BSK5 K64*
AT3G54030 BSK6 K65
AT1G63500 BSK7 K68*, K105, K304*
RLCK-XV AT1G52540 RLCK-XV family protein K249*
PERK AT3G24550 PERK1 K303
AT4G32710 PERK14 K18*
CDPK AT3G20410 CPK9 K71, K115, K427
AT4G04720 CPK21 K84, K526*
AT5G66210 CPK28 K25, K34, K48*, K97, K108, K206*, K217, K351, K401*, K785
MAPK AT3G63260 MRK1/RAF48 K342
Other protein kinase AT1G65950 Protein kinase superfamily protein K421
AT4G00300 Fringe-related protein K775
AT1G56145 LRR transmembrane protein kinase K725
AT3G27560 ATN1 K44*
AT1G03740 Protein kinase superfamily protein K56*
AT3G25840 PRP4KA K462*
AT4G35500 Protein kinase superfamily protein K247*
AT5G05200 Protein kinase superfamily protein K31*
AT5G40540 Protein kinase superfamily protein K44*
AT5G38480 GRF3/RCI1 K52
Other kinase AT1G12000 Phosphofructokinase family protein K23
AT4G21534 SPHK2 K49, K59
AT4G09320 NDPK1 K106
AT5G50780 AtMORC4 K736*, K766
AT1G12330 Cyclin-dependent kinase-like protein K184
AT4G36080 Inositol or phosphatidylinositol kinase K3581*
AT1G20930 CDKB2;2 K88*
AT5G26667 PYR6 K54*
AT4G29130 GIN2/HXK1 K117*
AT1G10900 Phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase family protein K28*

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

BIK1 is ubiquitinated on multiple lysines in vivo. A, Comparison between this study and Ma et al. (2020) indicates that BIK1 is ubiquitinated on three lysines at its amino (N) terminus, seven in its kinase domain, and five at its carboxyl (C) terminus. Ubiquitinated lysines identified in Ma et al. (2020) are shown in green, those identified in this study are shown in blue, and residues identified in both studies are in magenta. The ATP-binding site (ABS), catalytic loop (CL), activation loop (AL), and P +1 loop (PL) are indicated; the ABS is not surface-exposed, but the CL is shown in dark gray, the AL in white, and the PL in black. Although the structure of the BIK1 canonical kinase domain was recently solved (Lal et al., 2018), we modeled BIK1 in Phyre2-intensive mode (Kelley et al., 2015) in order to include the disordered N- and C-terminal ends in this surface representation in PyMol (The PyMol Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.0 Schrodinger, LLC). Phyre2-intensive modeling maximises sequence coverage and confidence to model regions for which there is no template information by an ab initio simplified-folding physics simulation; while 354/395 (90%) of the residues were modeled at >90% accuracy, it is likely that the model does not completely reflect the protein structure.

Analysis of gene ontology (GO) terms associated with proteins identified in the high-confidence dataset (Supplemental Table S1) indicated an enrichment of proteins localized to the “plasma membrane” (p =1.53 × 10−114; Supplemental Table S3). Because we analyzed the samples in the mass spectrometer in data-dependent mode, without quantification, we are unable to comment on differences between genotypes or immune treatments. Therefore, any immune-triggered events must be corroborated experimentally. Multiple sequence alignments of peptides spanning −10 to +10 amino- and carboxyl-terminal to the modified lysines indicated very little consensus and no significant motifs (Supplemental Figure S2). Unlike other post-translational modifications, the ubiquitination reaction requires coordination between E1 activating, E2 conjugating, and E3 ligase enzymes (Vierstra, 2012). While it may be possible for individual E2–E3 pairs to exhibit residue-level specificity on their target proteins, data from multiple species suggest that surface-availability may be the only unifying feature of ubiquitinated residues (Danielsen et al., 2011).

We identified ubiquitinated peptides mapping to proteins from diverse families, including aquaporins, H+ and Ca2+ ATPases, remorins, several classes of transporters, cellulose synthases, and others (Supplemental Tables S1–S2). Comparison between our dataset and eight published Arabidopsis ubiquitome datasets, as well as manual inspection of the literature, revealed 268 novel ubiquitin targets (Supplemental Table S4). We noted that molecular function GO terms “protein modification” (p =1.79 × 10−12), “phosphorylation” (p =2.15 × 10−26), and “response to stimulus” (p =6.44 × 10−21) were particularly enriched in our dataset (Supplemental Table S3). Interestingly, we identified multiple ubiquitinated lysines on over 70 RKs representing diverse subgroups, including FLS2, EFR, CERK1, LORE, RLK7, SOBIR1/EVR, LIK1, RKL1, WAK1, WAK2, FER, ER, BAM1, BAM2, and others (Table 1). We also identified ubiquitination sites on more than 20 plasma membrane-associated cytoplasmic protein kinases from several subgroups (Table 1). Because analysis of tryptic peptides with ubiquitinated lysine residues enriched by anti-K-ε-GG does not allow for discrimination between mono- or poly-ubiquitination, it is likely that we have captured both degradative and nondegradative ubiquitination on these protein kinases. Given the broad interest in phosphorylation-based signal transduction and protein homeostasis, we expect this information will be valuable to the plant research community and look forward to future studies that explore the function of these ubiquitination events.

Supplemental data

The following materials are available in the online version of this article.

Supplemental Methods. Methods used in this study.

Supplemental Figure S1. Ubiquitinated residues identified on BIK1.

Supplemental Figure S2. Consensus motif analysis of ubiquitinated lysines.

Supplemental Table S1 . High-confidence peptides identified in multiple experiments.

Supplemental Table S2. Peptides identified in single experiments.

Supplemental Table S3. Gene ontology terms associated with proteins identified in this study.

Supplemental Table S4. Comparative analysis reveals 268 unique ubiquitin targets identified in this study.

Supplementary Material

kiab023_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgments

We thank Jan Sklenar for helpful suggestions and technical assistance and are grateful to Melissa Bredow for help using Phyre2 and PyMol. We thank Libo Shan and Ping He for sharing data prior to publication.

Funding

This research was funded through a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Anniversary Future Leader Fellowship (J.M.), a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery grant (J.M.), a John R. Evans Leader’s Fund grant from the Canadian Foundation for Innovation and the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation (J.M.), Queen’s University start-up funds (J.M.), a grant from the European Research Council under the Grant Agreement 309858 (grant “PHOSPHinnATE”, C.Z.), and through generous support of the Gatsby Charitable Foundation (C.Z. and F.L.H.M). L.E.G. and K.E.D. were supported by NSERC Canada Graduate Scholarships for Masters students (CGS-M), NSERC Michael Smith Foreign Study Supplements, and Ontario Graduate Scholarships (OGS).

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

F.L.H.M. and J.M. designed the research; L.E.G. and F.L.H.M. performed the experiments; L.E.G., P.D., K.E.D., F.L.H.M., and J.M. analyzed the data; C.Z., F.L.H.M., and J.M. supervised the work; J.M. wrote the letter with input from all authors.

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (https://academic.oup.com/plphys/pages/general-instructions) is: Jacqueline Monaghan (jacqueline.monaghan@queensu.ca).

References

  1. Couto D, Roda N, Liang XX, Bücherl CA, Sklenar J, Macho AP, Ntoukakis V, Derbyshire P, Altenbach D, Maclean D, et al. (2016) The Arabidopsis protein phosphatase PP2C38 negatively regulates the central immune kinase BIK1. PLoS Pathogens 12: e1005811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Couto D, Zipfel C (2016) Regulation of pattern recognition receptor signalling in plants. Nature Reviews Immunology 16: 537–552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Danielsen JMR, Sylvestersen KB, Bekker-Jensen S, Szklarczyk D, Poulsen JW, Horn H, Jensen LJ, Mailand N, Nielsen ML (2011) Mass spectrometric analysis of lysine ubiquitylation reveals promiscuity at site level. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics: MCP 10: M110.003590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jiang Y, Han B, Zhang H, Mariappan KG, Bigeard J, Colcombet J, Hirt H (2019) MAP4K4 associates with BIK1 to regulate plant innate immunity. EMBO Reports 20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kelley LA, Mezulis S, Yates CM, Wass MN, Sternberg MJE (2015) The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nature Protocols 10: 845–858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lal NK, Nagalakshmi U, Hurlburt NK, Flores R, Bak A, Sone P, Ma X, Song GY, Walley J, Shan L, et al. (2018) The receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase BIK1 localizes to the nucleus and regulates defense hormone expression during plant innate immunity. Cell Host & Microbe 23: 485–497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Liang XX, Zhou J-M (2018) Receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases: central players in plant receptor kinase-mediated signaling. Annual Review of Plant Biology 69: 267–299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ma XY, Claus LAN, Leslie ME, Tao K, Wu Z, Liu J, Yu X, Li B, Zhou JG, Savatin DV, et al. (2020) Ligand-induced monoubiquitination of BIK1 regulates plant immunity. Nature 581: 199–203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mithoe SC, Menke FLH (2018) Regulation of pattern recognition receptor signalling by phosphorylation and ubiquitination. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 45: 162–170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Monaghan J, Matschi S, Shorinola O, Rovenich H, Matei A, Segonzac C, Malinovsky FG, Rathjen JP, MacLean D, Romeis T, et al. (2014) The calcium-dependent protein kinase CPK28 buffers plant immunity and regulates BIK1 turnover. Cell Host & Microbe 16: 605–615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Perez-Riverol Y, Csordas A, Bai JW, Bernal-Llinares M, Hewapathirana S, Kundu DJ, Inuganti A, Griss J, Mayer G, Eisenacher M, et al. (2019) The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Research 47: D442–450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shiu S-H, Bleecker AB (2001) Plant receptor-like kinase gene family: diversity, function, and signaling. Science Signaling 2001: re22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shiu SH, Bleecker AB (2003) Expansion of the receptor-like kinase/pelle gene family and receptor-like proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 132: 530–543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Swatek KN, Komander D (2016) Ubiquitin modifications. Cell Research 26: 399–422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Turek I, Tischer N, Lassig R, Trujillo M (2018) Multi-tiered pairing selectivity between E2 ubiquitin–conjugating enzymes and E3 ligases. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 293(42): 16324–16336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Udeshi ND, Mertins P, Svinkina T, Carr SA (2013) Large-scale identification of ubiquitination sites by mass spectrometry. Nature Protocols 8: 1950–1960 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vierstra RD (2012) The expanding universe of ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifiers. Plant Physiology 160: 2–14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Walton A, Stes E, Cybulski N, Van Bel M, Inigo S (2016) It’s time for some ‘site’-seeing: novel tools to monitor the ubiquitin landscape in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Cell 28: 6–16http://www.plantcell.org/content/28/1/6.short. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang J, Grubb LE, Wang J, Liang XX, Li L, Gao C, Ma M, Feng F, Li M, Li L, et al. (2018) A regulatory module controlling homeostasis of a plant immune kinase. Molecular Cell 69: 493–504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang MX, Chiang Y-H, Toruño TY, Lee D, Ma M, Liang X, Lal NK, Lemos M, Lu Y-J, Ma S, et al. (2018) The MAP4 Kinase SIK1 ensures robust extracellular ROS burst and antibacterial immunity in plants. Cell Host & Microbe 24: 379–391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zipfel C, Kunze G, Chinchilla D, Caniard A, Jones JDG, Boller T, Felix G (2006) Perception of the bacterial PAMP EF-Tu by the receptor EFR restricts agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Cell 125: 749–760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

kiab023_Supplementary_Data

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES