Skip to main content
The Angle Orthodontist logoLink to The Angle Orthodontist
letter
. 2019 Jan;89(1):164–165. doi: 10.2319/0003-3219-89.1.164

Letters From Our Readers

Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida 1
PMCID: PMC8137121  PMID: 30702941

To: Editor, The Angle Orthodontist.

Response to: A comparative study of the effect of the intrusion arch and straight wire mechanics on incisor root resorption: A randomized, controlled trial. Marcio R de Almeida, Aline SB Marcal, Thais MF Fernandes, Juliana B Vasconcelos; Renato R de Almeida; Ravindra Nanda. The Angle Orthodontist. 2018; 88: 20-26.

Thank you for your interest in our paper published in The Angle Orthodontist. This paper involved external apical root resorption (EARR) of maxillary incisors treated by intrusion arch or continuous archwire mechanics. Based on modern evidence-based orthodontics, we recognize that orthodontists are advised to use their best clinical judgment when prescribing radiographs, including CBCT scans, to obtain the most relevant data using the least ionizing radiation possible. We all know that the presence of EARR can be diagnosed by means of radiographic examinations.1 However, standardization of two-dimensional scans is quite difficult and a number of factors hinder proper radiographic findings, including anatomical variations.2 Furthermore, minor incisor angular changes cause significant alterations to linear measurements in the radiography. Consequently, technological innovations have made it possible to evaluate the degree of root resorption in a three-dimensional way, due to its precision in measuring root shortening. Thus, nowadays, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is referred to as the most precise tool to identify external root resorption and it has been considered to assess 3D craniofacial anatomy in health and disease and of treatment outcomes including that of root morphology and angulation, alveolar boundary conditions, maxillary transverse dimensions and maxillary expansion, airway morphology, vertical malocclusion and obstructive sleep apnea, TMJ morphology and pathology contributing to malocclusion, and temporary anchorage devices. 3 In fact, CBCT has been used to discern the potential effects of treatment- or patient-specific variables on the integrity and morphology of bone around tooth roots in full-fixed appliance therapy and with both rapid and slow expansion.412

Because CBCT can generate precise images of small root defects, it provides more accurate insights into root resorption and has greater sensitivity and specificity than do panoramic or other 2D radiographs in detecting these lesions.1316 Also, relative to CBCT, panoramic radiographs underestimate the presence of external apical root resorption (EARR).17,18 While 2D radiographs only provide visualization of the apex and the mesial and distal root surfaces, CBCT imaging enables the visualization of buccal and lingual root surfaces. This has led to the discovery that root loss is not only present at the root apex but often presents as a slanting root loss on surfaces adjacent to the direction of tooth movement. This finding highlights the efficacy of the 3D rendering capacity of CBCT for accurate diagnosis of both EARR and other previously uncharacterized types of root resorption. Thus, in addition to the previously accepted diagnosis of EARR that is observed in 2D radiographs, high-resolution CBCT may usher in a new diagnostic criteria of root resorption affecting root surfaces visualized by 3D but not by 2D radiographs.

For these reasons, we would like to state that our published paper is only a part of a more complete study that we are preparing for possible publication in order to analyze by means of CBCT other important parameters to give the readers the chance to better understand the clinical effects of deep bite correction using intrusion arches in adolescents given the fact that the literature is lacking such knowledge in a 3D way. We believe that the expected outcomes of the 3D information derived from CBCT relative to that obtained from traditional 2D radiographs ultimately may span from a refinement of treatment to a total modification in the treatment rendered.

The major concern of the questioners was related to use of a large Field of View (FOV) irradiating the patient's entire head. The reason for using this large FOV of the patients was that we can reproduce the lateral cephalogram as well as the panoramic views from only one CBCT scan of each patient, which allowed us to investigate other parameters without it being necessary to additionally irradiate patients in order to obtain lateral and panoramic radiographs. To date, the parameters that are being also investigated from the sample collected for the upcoming paper are: 3D analysis of buccal alveolar bone around the anterior teeth after the intrusion of the incisors, airway morphology, as well as the buccal alveolar bone around the anchorage teeth (maxillary molars) in the sagittal, vertical and transverse dimensions. CBCT research is beginning to provide critical information on potential new diagnostic categories such as alveolar bone boundary conditions and root integrity in dimensions not observed in that of 2D radiographs.

Alveolar boundary conditions are the depth, height and morphology of alveolar bone relative to tooth root dimensions, angulation and spatial position. Kapila and coworkers3 pointed out that, as further scientific evidence on the limitations imposed by boundary conditions and risks for root resorption on orthodontic treatment become available, clinicians may be able to answer important treatment planning questions such as (1) can the desired tooth movement be accomplished within the existing boundary conditions without damaging the roots or adjacent structures? (2) Will boundary conditions or root morphology be affected positively or negatively by skeletal or dentoalveolar expansion or tooth retraction? (3) What are the effects of compromised bone (as in periodontal disease) on the ability to move teeth in the sagittal or transverse planes? (4) How are alveolar bone adaptability and risks for root resorption affected by age, periodontal health and the pre-treatment bone and anatomic phenotype of the patient? Finally, we hope we may be able to answer those important questions raised in the near future carrying out our CBCT study.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Souza PC, Willems G. In-vitro comparison of 2 cone-beam computed tomography systems and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(6):764–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(4Suppl):S100–S8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kapila SD, Nervina JM. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015 Jan;44(1):20140282. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cattaneo PM, Treccani M, Carlsson K, Thorgeirsson T, Myrda A, Cevidanes LH, et al. Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011;14:222–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2011.01527.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Corbridge JK, Campbell PM, Taylor R, Ceen RF, Buschang PH. Transverse dentoalveolar changes after slow maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140:317–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.025. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Garrett BJ, Caruso JM, Rungcharassaeng K, Farrage JR, Kim JS, Taylor GD. Skeletal effects to the maxilla after rapid maxillary expansion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:8–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.004. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Johnson DP. Effects of curve of Wilson correction and pre-treatment boundary conditions on quantitative changes in alveolar bone morphology. MSc thesis. University of Michigan School of Dentistry. 2011.
  • 8.Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JY, Kim J, Taylor G. Factors affecting buccal bone changes of maxillary posterior teeth after rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132(428):e1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.052. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tai K, Hotokezaka H, Park JH, Tai H, Miyajima K, Choi M, et al. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138(262):e1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.023. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tai K, Park JH. Dental and skeletal changes in the upper and lower jaws after treatment with Schwarz appliances using cone-beam computed tomography. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010;35:111–20. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.1.b21t44rj34027603. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tai K, Park JH, Mishima K, Shin JW. 3-Dimensional cone-beam computed tomography analysis of transverse changes with Schwarz appliances on both jaws. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:670–7. doi: 10.2319/110910-655.1. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Welmerink AD. MSc thesis. University of Michigan School of Dentistry; 2012. Effects of non-extraction orthodontic therapy and boundary conditions on quantitative changes in alveolar bone morphology. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Durack C, Patel S, Davies J, Wilson R, Mannocci F. Diagnostic accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiography for the detection of simulated external inflammatory root resorption. Int Endodont J. 2011;44:136–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01819.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ponder S. MSc thesis. University of Michigan School of Dentistry; 2011. Diagnostic capability of CBCT in determining external root resorption: a volumetric and linear analysis. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ponder SN, Benavides E, Kapila S, Hatch NE. Quantification of external root resorption by low- vs high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography: a volumetric and linear analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143:77–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.08.023. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ren H, Chen J, Deng F, Zheng L, Liu X, Dong Y. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography for detecting simulated apical root resorption. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:189–95. doi: 10.2319/050512-372.1. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dudic A, Giannopoulou C, Leuzinger M, Kiliaridis S. Detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment by using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:434–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.10.014. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Segal GR, Schiffman PH, Tuncay OC. Meta-analysis of the treatment-related factors of external apical root resorption. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2004;7:71–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2004.00286.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Angle Orthodontist are provided here courtesy of Edward H Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc

RESOURCES