Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2021 May 2;210(2):157–163. doi: 10.1007/s00430-021-00709-2

What we actually know about the pathogenicity of Bacteroides pyogenes

Anna Majewska 1,, Marta Kierzkowska 1, Dariusz Kawecki 1
PMCID: PMC8137477  PMID: 33934237

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the pathogenic potential of Bacteroides pyogenes, rarely identified in clinical laboratories anaerobic bacteria. To increase the knowledge about this poorly understood anaerobic microorganism, the study also includes cases of infections described so far in the literature. Only the use of 16S rRNA sequencing and mass spectrometry technique allowed the identification of B. pyogenes from clinical specimens. We reported 13 severe human infections caused by B. pyogenes. Bacteria were cultured from the wound after biting by animals, chronic infections within the oral cavity, from patients with histologically or radiological proven osteomyelitis, surgical site infection, and from urine sample collected after a urological procedure. Most (9/13) of the patients required hospitalization. Almost 70% of them needed urgent admission via the emergency room. Two inpatients due to a life-threatening condition were admitted to the intensive care unit. Almost 50% of isolates were resistant to penicillin. All resistant to penicillin strains were isolated from skin and mucous membrane infections.

Keywords: Anaerobic infection, Bacteroides pyogenes, MALDTI-TOF MS, Penicillin resistance, Zoonotic infection, 16S rRNA

Introduction

Anaerobic bacteria are important human pathogens and are involved in endogenous, opportunistic infections of every part of the body including skin and subcutaneous tissues, mainly because of a disruption in tissue barriers. Although anaerobes were first discovered and identified in the 60. of the XIX century the knowledge about their pathogenicity in humans is still incomplete, but thanks to new microbiological techniques it is systematically expanded. Nevertheless, anaerobic infections are the most overlooked of all bacterial infections. Of all known anaerobes Bacteroides are the most often isolated from clinical specimens [14]. To date, Bacteroides fragilis is regarded as the most virulent. Other clinically relevant species are: B. ovatus, B. thetaiotaomicron, B. vulgatus, and Parabacteroides distasonis [3]. The use of 16S rRNA sequencing and mass spectrometry technique allowed the identification of other Bacteroides, rarely described so far in the medical literature. One of them is B. pyogenes [58].

The taxonomy of the genus Bacteroides has undergone significant changes. This also applies to Bacteroides pyogenes. 16S rRNA and hsp60 gene sequencing were used for the classification and establishment of phylogenetic relationships. Sakamoto et al. concluded that B. suis and B. tectus are heterotypic synonyms of B. pyogenes [9]. Four years later the whole-genome sequencing of these three strains was expected to provide new information. Analyses of genomes revealed the diversification of B. pyogenes strains isolated from different animals [10]. Further analysis will improve the understanding of this species.

Presently it is known that B. pyogenes is an obligately anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli (AGNB), non-motile, non-pigment-forming, non-spore-forming, produce succinic and acetic acids. B. pyogenes is a component of the natural microbiota of the animal’s (dogs and cats) oral cavity [11, 12]. B. pyogenes was first isolated from abscesses and feces of pigs in the 1980s, then from the uterus of metritis [11, 13, 14] and from the horse's wound [15]. It has been reported that B. pyogenes is a human pathogen, as well. The findings of 10 patients with B. pyogenes infection, described so far in the literature, are presented in Table 1. All isolates were identified by 16S rRNA sequencing or by Bruker matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDTI-TOF MS) [58]. To date, no information on the biology and pathogenicity of this species has been published.

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of Bacteroides pyogenes infections described in the literature

Clinical characteristics Specimen Etiology Ref
Bacteremia secondary to cat bite Smear from the bite wound Bacteroides pyogenes, Pasteurella multocida [5]
Blood Bacteroides pyogenes
Bacteremia secondary to liver abscess; no history of an animal exposure Blood Bacteroides pyogenes [8]
Aspiration of the liver abscess Bacteroides pyogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae
Prosthetic joint infection Replaced polyethylene Bacteroides pyogenes, Peptostreptococcus canis [6]
Sonicated fluid of the prosthesis Bacteroides pyogenes
3 cases of dog bites Smear from the wound Bacteroides pyogenes [7]

Bacteroides pyogenes, Pasteurella canis

Pasteurella stomatis, Staphylococcus pseudintermedius

Bacteroides pyogenes, Pasteurella dogmatis
3 cases of cat bites Bacteroides pyogenes (2 cases)
Bacteroides pyogenes, Pasteurella multocida
Trauma; amputation, revision of a stump Smear from the wound Bacteroides pyogenes, Staphylococcus aureus

The objective of the study is to evaluate the pathogenic potential of B. pyogenes by presenting the cases of infections observed at our laboratory. Additionally, we reviewed the literature to summarize the experience with B. pyogenes infectious and to clarify, in the light of the current knowledge, certain clinical, and therapeutic issues related to this anaerobic bacteria.

Materials and methods

A retrospective study was conducted including infected patients from whom B. pyogenes has been isolated from the site of infection. Bacterial isolates were collected during a routine microbiological examination of samples taken from adult patients treated at the Infant Jesus Teaching Hospital in Warsaw, Poland. In the period of 2013–2020 fifteen strains of B. pyogenes from thirteen patients were isolated.

The bacterial strains were cultured from the following specimens: pus (1), swab from an abscess (1) or wound (7), swab from the alveolar jaw (1), intraoperatively taken tissue (2), transtracheal aspirate (1), bile (1), urine (1). The specimens were cultured on bacteriological (Blood agar, MacConkey agar, Chocolate agar) and mycological (Sabouraud agar) media at 37 °C. To isolate anaerobic bacteria each sample was cultured on Schaedler agar with 5% sheep blood and vitamin K1, incubated for 48 h in anaerobic conditions (Genbox anaer, bioMérieux). All media were provided by bioMérieux, France. Presumptive identification using Gram staining preceded identification by MALDI-TOF MS technique in the Vitek MS v3.0 system (bioMérieux). All isolates were identified with an acceptable confidence value of 99.9%.

Drug susceptibility assessment was performed by the Etest method (bioMérieux) using strips impregnated, commonly used to treat anaerobic infections antibiotics: benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin with clavulanic acid, imipenem, clindamycin and metronidazole. The antibiogram interpretation was conducted in accordance with The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing [16]. All samples were collected as part of routine hospitals surveillance.

Results

This retrospective study involved 13 patients (5 male and 8 female) at the age from 35 to 89 (average 64.2) years old. Four patients were treated at the hospital outpatient clinics. Nine (69%) required hospitalization. Six of them (67%) because of a serious infection needed urgent admission via the emergency room. Two inpatients (22%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to a life-threatening condition. Clinical details of patients and microbiological findings were shown in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively.

Table 2.

Clinical characteristic of patients: diagnosis, diagnostic procedures and antibiotic therapy

Dep Patient no
age/sex
Clinical presentation/diagnosis CC Surgical procedures ED ICU Antibiotic therapy Time in hospital Specimen/sample/organ Diagnostic procedures
Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

1

67/M

Extensive, chronic soft tissue necrosis within oral cavity, osteomyelitis of the mandible bone

*Carcinoma of the lower lip with reconstruction plate and radiation therapy (3 years earlier)

*ONCO

IMM

IMP

Surgical debridement, sequestromy

Removal of reconstruction plate

No Yes gentamicin, ampicillin 28 days Pus from an abscess Microbiology; PB culture
Mandibular bone fragment Histopatology
Head CT

2

70/M

Odontogenic infection, chronic maxillary sinusitis (left)

Osteomyelitis of the jaw bone

Surgical debridement, drainage No No clindamycin 3 days Swab from the alveolar jaw Microbiology; PB culture
Swab from sinus Microbiology; negative culture
Bone fragment Histopatology

3

84/F

Phlegmon on the skin (neck and anterior chest wall), necrotic lesions with fistulas, primary infection in the oral cavity Surgical debridement, drainage Yes No metronidazole, vancomycin 36 days Swab from wound Microbiology; PB culture
Chest X-ray, CT

4

35/M

Trauma; multiple fracture of mandibular bones with displacement, subcutaneous emphysema, necrotic inflammation of the submandibular and pharynx area Surgical debridement, drainage, intubation Yes Yes ampicillin, clindamycin (7 days) then ceftriaxone, metronidazole 23 days Intraoperatively taken tissue Microbiology; PB culture
Transtracheal aspirate Microbiology; MB culture
Head X-ray, CT
Department of General Surgery

5

67/M

Forefoot necrosis, edema, surgical site infection (amputation right foot, II and III finger), bubbles filled with gas, osteomyelitis DM Repeated surgical debridement Yes No metronidazole, clindamycin repeated hospital admissions in short intervals Intraoperatively taken tissues Microbiology; PB culture
Forefoot X-ray

6

73/F

Cholecystolithiasis Yes No ceftriaxone 10 days Bile Microbiology; PB culture

7

89/F

Cat bite, phlegmon (right hand) Surgical debridement drainage No No amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, azithromycin 3 days Swab from abscess Microbiology; MB culture
Department of Urology

8

72/F

Bladder carcinoma

ONCO

DM

Transurethral resection of a bladder tumor Yes No cefuroxime (intraoperative) 22 days Urine sample collected by the ureter catheter Microbiology; PB culture CT
Department of Internal Medicine

9

79/F

Subcutaneous tissue inflammation, phlegmon (right foot) Surgical debridement Yes No ND 61 days Swab from wound Microbiology; MB culture 29 days later PB culture
Right foot X-ray
Orthopedic ambulatory

10

70/F

Dog bite ND ND No No ND N/A Swab from wound Microbiology; PB culture

11

35/F

Dog bite ND ND No No ND N/A Wound swab (finger II, left hand) Microbiology; PB culture
Surgical ambulatory

12

39/F

Wound ND ND No No ND N/A Swab from wound Microbiology; PB culture

13

55/M

Wound ND ND No No ND N/A Swab from wound Microbiology; PB culture

Dep department, CC co-occurring, M male, F female, ED Emergency Department, ICU Intensive Care Unit, ONCO oncologic history, IMM immunosuppression history, IMP artificial material, implant, DM diabetes mellitus, PB polybacterial infection, MB monobacterial infection, CT computer tomography, ND no date, N/A not applicable

Table 3.

Microbiological characteristic of patients: specimens tested, co-pathogens isolated, B. pyogenes antimicrobial susceptibility

Patient No Specimen Microbiological results
B. pyogenes susceptibilitya Co-isolated bacteria
PEN CLI aerobic bacteria anaerobic bacteria
1 Pus/swab from an abscess B. pyogenes R R

Eikenella corrodens

Enterococcus faecalis

Staphylococcus pneumoniae

2 Swab from the alveolar jaw B. pyogenes R S

Enterococcus faecalis

Streptococcus parasanquinis

3 Wound swab B. pyogenes R S Staphylococcus epidermidis -
4 Intraoperatively taken tissue B. pyogenes S S Streptococcus anginosus Fusobacterium nucleatum
Transtracheal aspirate B. pyogenes > 105 CFU/mL S S
5 Intraoperatively taken tissue B. pyogenes S S Proteus mirabilis Finegoldia magna
6 Bile B. pyogenes S S Escherichia coli Clostridium perfringens
7 Pus/swab from an abscess B. pyogenes R S
8 Urine (ureteral catheter) B. pyogenes 103 CFU/mL S S Veillonella atypica
9 Wound swab B. pyogenes S S
B. pyogenes R S

Enterococcus faecalis HLAR

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Alcaligens faecalis

Staphylococcus aureus MRSA

Parvimonas micra
10 Wound swab B. pyogenes S S Pasteurella multocida Fusobacterium nucleatum
11 Wound swab B. pyogenes R S

Peptostreptococcus harei

Cutibacterium acnes

12 Wound swab B. pyogenes R S Staphylococcus aureus Fusobacterium nucleatum
13 Wound swab B. pyogenes S S Pasteurella canis

R resistant, S susceptible, PEN penicillin, CLI clindamycin, CFU colony forming unit

aAll B. pyogenes isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, imipenem, metronidazole

Analysis of patients hospitalized in the Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery (Patient No.,,1”to,,4”) suggests that the human oral cavity may be a source of B. pyogenes (resident microbiota or transient colonization) and the presence of additional factors such as: trauma, including surgical interventions, presence of an artificial implant, cancer, chronic inflammation, and advanced age can predispose to deep tissue infections and even osteomyelitis. Infections with the participation of B. pyogenes were chronic and had polybacterial nature; one to three species of other bacteria from the single sample were co-cultured. All patients required surgical debridement of wounds, three necessitated long-term hospitalization (23–36 days). Analysis of the two patients’ history showed the involvement of B. pyogenes in histologically confirmed osteomyelitis (mandible and jaw; Patients No.,,1” and,,2”, respectively). In Patient No.,,4” besides intraoperatively taken sample, aspirate during endotracheal intubation was taken and merely B. pyogenes was cultured (> 105 CFU/ml; CFU; colony forming units). In this patient, extensive infection with gas-filled bubbles and necrotic inflammation in the submandibular and pharyngeal area was accompanied by fluid in both pleural cavities. This patient required mechanical ventilation support and was hospitalized in ICU.

Three patients were admitted to the Department of General Surgery. In patient No.,,5” with diabetes mellitus surgical site infection (SSI) was diagnosed. Within 73 days after amputation surgical debridement of the wound have been performed three times. Patient required repeated in the short intervals’ hospitalization. Forefoot necrosis was finally diagnosed. B. pyogenes, Finegoldia magna and Proteus mirabilis were isolated from an intraoperative taken specimen. Osteomyelitis was confirmed by radiological examination.

B. pyogenes was isolated from a bile sample (Patient No.,,6”; 73-year-old woman with cholecystolithiasis) and from a urine sample collected from the 72-year-old woman hospitalized in the Department of Urology (Patient No.,,8”). She had transurethral resection of a bladder tumor (TURBT). B. pyogenes, to our knowledge, have never been isolated from such specimens before.

Bacteria were also isolated from the wound after biting by domestic animals (cat—Patient No.,,7″, dog—Patients No.,,10″ and,,11″). In one other Patient (No.,,13” with incomplete medical history) B. pyogenes was isolated from wound together with Pasteurella canis, what suggest zoonotic infection. In other patient with infected wound (Patient,,12”) we do not confirm any contact with animals.

Patient No.,,9″ (79—year old women) deserves special attention because of the presence of an acute, purulent inflammation on the skin and subcutaneous tissue infections. From the smear of the wound only B. pyogenes (monobacterial infection) was isolated, but 29 days later, probable because of long-term hospitalization (61 days), other five species were co-cultured; including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Enterococcus faecalis with high-level aminoglycoside resistance (HLAR).

Detailed characteristics of 4 patients (No. from,,10” to,,13”) were not available for us because they were treated at the hospital outpatient clinics.

We recorded that six of the seven inpatients with skin and mucous membranes injury infection were chronic, and five of the seven patients required long-term hospitalization (from 22 to 61 days). Nine out of eleven skin and mucous membranes infection was polybacterial (Table 3).

All of the isolated B. pyogenes strains were susceptible to amoxicillin with clavulanic acid, imipenem, and metronidazole. Overall, 7 of the isolates were resistant to penicillin, 1 isolate was resistant to clindamycin. We noticed that all penicillin-resistant B. pyogenes strains were isolated from surface infections (skin and mucous membranes). Isolates from bile, urine, and intraoperatively taken samples were susceptible to this antibiotic. All patients received empirical treatment covering the spectrum of cultured bacteria.

Discussion

Applications of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry allowed to identify B. pyogenes in clinical samples. To our knowledge, only ten cases of infection with this anaerobic species have been described so far in medical literature. In a retrospective analysis of patients with microbiologically proven B. pyogenes infection, we confirmed the reports of other researchers that B. pyogenes participate in infections after a dog and cat bites. Such infections were monobacterial or polybacterial. It is known that associations between many microorganisms often complicate the treatment of infections [5, 7].

The new observation is the presence of B. pyogenes in the urine sample collected by the ureter catheter. Bacteria in a titer of 103 CFU/mL were isolated together with other anaerobic bacteria—Veillonella atypica. Anaerobes are treated as rare uropathogens (< 1%). Veillonella usually resides on the oral mucosa and genital tract. However, the case report published by Berenger et al. proves participation of anaerobic bacteria in cystitis and pyelonephritis, especially in patients with a history of catheterization and/or instrumentation [17]. This information can be obtained only by using sensitive methods of bacterial identification, e.g., MALDI–TOF or 16S rRNA sequencing.

B. pyogenes was also isolated from the bile sample. In the clinical case reported by Park JE et al. bacteria was responsible for liver abscess [8]. Both cases concerned women over 70 years of age with cholecystitis and radiolucent stones.

In the presented study, we noticed that B. pyogenes causes chronic oral infections. These infections were spread to surrounding tissues and cause necrosis, osteomyelitis, and fistula.

Osteitis and osteomyelitis are serious complications but based on the analysis of the literature it seems that anaerobic etiology is uncommon. In fact, however, many anaerobic infections are presumably underestimated because of difficulties with isolation and identification [4, 18]. Anaerobes are notable in osteomyelitis of cranial and facial bones which is usually caused by oral microbiome that spread from a contiguous soft-tissue source, from sinus, or dental infection [3]. We have observed that B. pyogenes participates in this pathology. Published reports indicate that Bacteroides spp. seldom leads to surgical site infection (SSI), especially if it is not associated with abdominal surgery, however, the importance of these bacteria cannot be ignored [19]. We isolated B. pyogenes from SSI after amputation due to chronic inflammation and necrosis of the toe in a patient with diabetes mellitus. B. pyogenes was cultured from the sample collected during wound purifying, and osteomyelitis was demonstrated by radiological examination.

Bacteroides spp. are characterized by the highest antibiotic resistance among anaerobes visibly increasing for over a decade [2, 20]. B. pyogenes isolated from human or animals has previously been shown to be highly susceptible to penicillin (lack of beta-lactamase production). This distinguishes it from other species of the genus Bacteroides [9, 13, 17]. However, in the presented study, seven isolates were resistant to penicillin. Due to the limited number of analyzed strains, it is difficult to accurately assess the drug resistance profile of B. pyogenes, which is a significant limitation of this work.

Conclusions

Laboratory diagnosis of anaerobic infections is still a challenge. The reliability of the microbiological test result significantly depends on pre-laboratory procedures and access to molecular methods that are effective in identifying anaerobes. Currently, clinical laboratories have better access to modern, accurate methods. Consequently, new or previously unassociated with human infections species of bacteria are identified. One of them is B. pyogenes which, causes serious and chronic infections which predicts long-term hospitalization and intravenous therapy. Its pathogenic potential and resistance to antibiotics should be further observed.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors state that there is no conflict of interest.

Consent for publication

All authors agreed the work to be published.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Wexler HM. Bacteroides: the good, the bad, and the nitty-gritty. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20:593–621. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00008-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nagy E, Boyanova L, Justesen US, ESCMID Study Group of Anaerobic Infections How to isolate, identify and determine antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in routine laboratories. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:1139–1148. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brook I. Spectrum and treatment of anaerobic infections. J Infect Chemother. 2016;22:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2015.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kierzkowska M, Pedzisz P, Babiak I, Janowicz J, Kulig M, Majewska A, et al. Orthopedic infections caused by obligatory anaerobic gram-negative rods: report of two cases. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2017;206:363–366. doi: 10.1007/s00430-017-0513-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Madsen IR, Justesen US. Bacteremia with Bacteroides pyogenes after a cat bite. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:3092–3093. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00250-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gual-de-Torrella A, Suárez-Barrenechea AI, Toro MD. Peptostreptococcus canis and Bacteroides pyogenes prosthetic joint infection. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (English ed) 2019;37:347–348. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2018.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lau J, Korman T, Yeung A, Streitberg R, Francis MJ, Graham M. Bacteroides pyogenes causing serious human wound infection from animal bites. Anaerobe. 2016;42:172–175. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Park JE, Park SY, Song DJ, Huha JH, Ki CS, Peck KR, et al. A case of Bacteroides pyogenes bacteremia secondary to liver abscess. Anaerobe. 2016;42:78–80. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sakamoto M, Suzuki N, Benno Y. hsp60 and 16S rRNA gene sequence relationships among species of the genus Bacteroides with the finding that Bacteroides suis and Bacteroides tectus are heterotypic synonyms of Bacteroides pyogenes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:2984–2990. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.021154-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sakamoto M, Oshima K, Suda W, Kitamura K, Iida T, Hattor M, et al. Draft genome sequences of three strains of Bacteroides pyogenes isolated from a cat and swine. Genome Announc. 2014;2:e01242–e11213. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01242-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Benno Y, Watabe J, Mitsuoka T. Bacteroides pyogenes sp. nov., Bacteroides suis sp. nov., and Bacteroides helcogenes sp. nov., new species from abscesses and feces of pigs. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1983;4:396–407. doi: 10.1016/S0723-2020(83)80024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Goldstein EJC, Citron DM, Tyrrell KL, Leoncio E, Merriam CV. Comparative in vitro activity of omadacycline against dog and cat bite wound isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62:e02551–e12517. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02551-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jeon SJ, Cunha F, Ma X, Martinez N, Vieira-Neto A, Daetz R, et al. Uterine microbiota and immune parameters associated with fever in dairy cows with metritis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0165740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cunha F, Jeon SJ, Jeong KC, Galvão KN. Draft genome sequences of Bacteroides pyogenes strains isolated from the uterus of holstein dairy cows with metritis. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2019;8:e01043–e11019. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01043-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ovesen AL, Riihimäki M, Båverud V, Pringle M. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacteroides spp. from clinical samples from horses. J Equine Vet Sci. 2016;45:46–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.06.073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Eucast, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Clinical breakpoints for bacteria, Version 11.0, (2021). Accessed 26 January 2021
  • 17.Berenger BM, Chui L, Borkent A, Lee MC. Anaerobic urinary tract infection caused by Veillonella parvula identified using cystine-lactose-electrolyte deficient media and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. IDCases. 2015;2:44–46. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2015.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Al-Tawfiq JA. Bacteroides fragilis bacteremia associated with vertebral osteomyelitis in a sickle cell patient. Intern Med. 2008;47:2183–2185. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.47.1271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Takesue Y, Kusachi S, Mikamo H. Antimicrobial susceptibility of pathogens isolated from surgical site infections in Japan: comparison of data from nationwide surveillance studies conducted in 2010 and 2014–2015. J Infect Chemother. 2017;23:339–348. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kierzkowska M, Majewska A, Szymanek-Majchrzak K, Sawicka-Grzelak A, Mlynarczyk A, Mlynarczyk G. The presence of antibiotic resistance genes and bft genes as well as antibiotic susceptibility testing of Bacteroides fragilis strains isolated from inpatients of the Infant Jesus Teaching Hospital, Warsaw during 2007–2012. Anaerobe. 2019;56:109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medical Microbiology and Immunology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES