Skip to main content
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences logoLink to Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
. 2021 May 7;8:656439. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.656439

Adhesion of Helicobacter Species to the Human Gastric Mucosa: A Deep Look Into Glycans Role

Rita Matos 1,2,3, Irina Amorim 1,2,3, Ana Magalhães 1,2, Freddy Haesebrouck 4, Fátima Gärtner 1,2, Celso A Reis 1,2,3,5,*
PMCID: PMC8138122  PMID: 34026832

Abstract

Helicobacter species infections may be associated with the development of gastric disorders, such as gastritis, peptic ulcers, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and gastric carcinoma. Binding of these bacteria to the gastric mucosa occurs through the recognition of specific glycan receptors expressed by the host epithelial cells. This review addresses the state of the art knowledge on these host glycan structures and the bacterial adhesins involved in Helicobacter spp. adhesion to gastric mucosa colonization. Glycans are expressed on every cell surface and they are crucial for several biological processes, including protein folding, cell signaling and recognition, and host-pathogen interactions. Helicobacter pylori is the most predominant gastric Helicobacter species in humans. The adhesion of this bacterium to glycan epitopes present on the gastric epithelial surface is a crucial step for a successful colonization. Major adhesins essential for colonization and infection are the blood-group antigen-binding adhesin (BabA) which mediates the interaction with fucosylated H-type 1 and Lewis B glycans, and the sialic acid-binding adhesin (SabA) which recognizes the sialyl-Lewis A and X glycan antigens. Since not every H. pylori strain expresses functional BabA or SabA adhesins, other bacterial proteins are most probably also involved in this adhesion process, including LabA (LacdiNAc-binding adhesin), which binds to the LacdiNAc motif on MUC5AC mucin. Besides H. pylori, several other gastric non-Helicobacter pylori Helicobacters (NHPH), mainly associated with pigs (H. suis) and pets (H. felis, H. bizzozeronii, H. salomonis, and H. heilmannii), may also colonize the human stomach and cause gastric disease, including gastritis, peptic ulcers and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. These NHPH lack homologous to the major known adhesins involved in colonization of the human stomach. In humans, NHPH infection rate is much lower than in the natural hosts. Differences in the glycosylation profile between gastric human and animal mucins acting as glycan receptors for NHPH-associated adhesins, may be involved. The identification and characterization of the key molecules involved in the adhesion of gastric Helicobacter species to the gastric mucosa is important to understand the colonization and infection strategies displayed by different members of this genus.

Keywords: adhesion, gastric mucosa, glycans, glycosylation, helicobacter

Glycosylation and Glycan Structures

Glycosylation is a post-translational modification and is defined as the covalent attachment of single sugars (saccharides) to other saccharides, proteins or lipids (Pinho and Reis, 2015; Eichler, 2019; Endo, 2019; Mereiter et al., 2019). This enzyme-mediated glycosidic linkage to specific residues on the target molecules follows the secretory pathway, beginning in the endoplasmic reticulum, in the case of N-glycosylation, and finishing in the Golgi apparatus, with major effects on function, stability and subcellular localization of the newly biosynthesized glycoconjugate (Moremen et al., 2012; Pinho and Reis, 2015; Eichler, 2019; Schjoldager et al., 2020). Glycosylation is an essential mechanism for the regulation of several biological processes, such as cell-cell and cell-matrix interaction, protein folding, protection from proteases and subcellular targeting (Eichler, 2019; Endo, 2019). Additionally, glycans have been described as crucial for the interaction and adhesion of several microorganisms to human cells (Etzold and Juge, 2014; Formosa-Dague et al., 2018; Thompson et al., 2019).

Protein glycosylation can be classified in families according to the nature of the linkage, being the biosynthesis and further modifications tissue and cell specific, controlled by glycosyltransferases (Pinho and Reis, 2015). The two main protein glycosylation pathways are the O- and N-glycosylation, that differ on the amino acid used for the attachment of the glycans. The interaction between the reducing terminal of a N-Acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) with the amine group of an asparagine via an aspartylglycosylamine linkage constitutes the first step of the N-glycans biosynthesis (Magalhaes et al., 2010; Pinho and Reis, 2015; Eichler, 2019; Endo, 2019; Mereiter et al., 2019). The attachment of the reducing terminal of a N-Acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) residue to the hydroxyl group of a serine or threonine initiates the protein O-glycosylation pathway (Schjoldager et al., 2020).

The biosynthesis of the abundant form of GalNAc-type O-glycosylation is initiated by a group of enzymes named polypeptide N-acetylgalactosamine transferases (ppGalNAc-Ts), which includes a family of 20 enzymes that catalyze the addition of a GalNAc residue (Bennett et al., 2012). The addition of a galactose residue in a β1-3-linkage onto GalNAc-O-Ser/Thr originates the formation of the core-1 structure. Next, a second neutral sugar (GlcNAc) can be added onto a β1-6 position to the core one structure, by core two synthases, forming the core-2 structure (Pinho and Reis, 2015; Symmes et al., 2018). These structures can be further elongated by the addition of Gal and GlcNAc residues. Additionally, these glycan structures can be terminally decorated with the addition of sialic acid and fucose residues, by sialyltransferases and fucosyltransferases (Pinho and Reis, 2015; Mereiter et al., 2019). This type of glycosylation is often called mucin type O-glycosylation because it is highly abundant in mucins. In addition to the O-GalNAc forms, O-glycosylation can also occur with fucose (Fuc), mannose (Man), GlcNAc or glucose (Glc) residues (Eichler, 2019).

Mucins are high molecular weight glycoproteins, encoded by over 21 different genes, that can be expressed in a broad range of epithelial tissues, in a tissue-specific manner (Hollingsworth and Swanson, 2004; Duarte et al., 2016). Mucins can be divided into three subgroups: the secreted-gel forming mucins, the cell-surface mucins and the secreted non-gel-forming mucins (Linden et al., 2008). Mucins are important players in the pathogen binding, regulation of antimicrobial responses and induction of tolerance mechanisms (Linden et al., 2008; Magalhaes and Reis, 2010). In fact, mucins are essential for cell protection against pathogens and chemical, enzymatic and mechanical damage, since this mucous layer is the first barrier that these agents need to cross (Linden et al., 2008; Heggelund et al., 2017). The main mucins present on the human healthy gastric mucosa are the membrane-bound MUC1, and the secreted MUC5AC and MUC6, which are the main constituents of the gastric mucous layer (Reis et al., 1997; Reis et al., 2000; Ferreira et al., 2006; Linden et al., 2008; Magalhaes and Reis 2010; Symmes et al., 2018). MUC1 is the most widely studied mucin and is expressed mainly by the foveolar epithelial cells. The secreted MUC5AC is expressed by the foveolar epithelium, while the MUC6 expression is limited to the glands (Reis et al., 1997; Reis et al., 1999; Reis et al., 2000; Linden et al., 2008; Magalhaes and Reis 2010). Occasionally, under pathological conditions, namely intestinal metaplasia, a different pattern of mucins expression can be observed, such as the de novo expression of MUC2 (Reis et al., 1999; Teixeira et al., 2002; Linden et al., 2008; Magalhaes and Reis 2010).

Besides these two main types of glycans on proteins, other classes of glycoconjugates are present on the cell, including the proteoglycans and the glycosphingolipids, and other glycosylation forms can also occur on specific types of proteins, namely the Notch receptor (Pinho and Reis, 2015).

Biosynthesis of Histo-Blood Group Antigens

Glycosylation is a highly regulated process important for homeostasis, but alterations have been described to occur in pathological scenarios. The histo-blood group ABO (H) antigens are found in several extracellular fluids, such as saliva and tears, and at the surface of epithelial cells. They mediate the contact with multiple pathogens (De Oliveira et al., 2017; Le Pendu and Ruvoen-Clouet, 2020). The synthesis of the ABO (H) antigens occur by the addition of saccharide residues to both glycoproteins and glycolipids (Yamamoto et al., 1990) (Figure 1). The H phenotype results from the linkage of a fucose to the terminal galactose of the core chains, by an α1,2-fucosyltransferase, resulting in the H antigens 1 and 2 (H-Type 1 and H-Type 2 (Le Pendu et al., 1982; Oriol et al., 1986; Clausen and Hakomori, 1989; Koda et al., 1996; Torrado et al., 2000). The blood-group A and B phenotypes result from the addition of terminal galactose derivates to the H antigens (GalNAcα1, 3 or Galα1, 3), by the action of a GalNAc or a D-galactosyltransferase, respectively (Le Pendu et al., 1982; Oriol et al., 1986; Clausen and Hakomori, 1989; Koda et al., 1996). The Lewis antigens are terminal fucosylated glycan structures that decorate a huge number of glycan chains, which can be classified as type 1 or type 2 Lewis antigens, based on their biosynthesis (Amorim et al., 2014; Magalhaes et al., 2015). The type 1 structures (Lewis A, Lewis B and sialyl-Lewis A) are characterized by the Galβ1,3GlcNAc linkage, while type 2 antigens (Lewis X, Lewis Y and sialyl-Lewis X) display a Galβ1,4GlcNAc linkage (Le Pendu et al., 1982; Oriol et al., 1986; Pinho and Reis, 2015; Symmes et al., 2018). The Lewis A (LeA) and Lewis X (LeX) antigens are formed by the addition of a branched fucose residue to the type 1/2chains (Watkins, 1980; Le Pendu et al., 1982; Oriol et al., 1986; Clausen and Hakomori, 1989; Torrado et al., 2000). On the other hand, Lewis B (LeB) and Lewis Y (LeY) are difucosylated structures, resulting from the attachment of a fucose to the monofucosylated H-Type 1 and H-Type 2 antigens, respectively (Watkins, 1980; Le Pendu et al., 1982; Oriol et al., 1986; Clausen and Hakomori, 1989). The synthesis of these antigens is mediated by several glycosyltransferases, including fucosyltransferases and sialyltransferases, among others (Harduin-Lepers et al., 2012; Pinho and Reis, 2015; De Oliveira et al., 2017).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Biosynthetic pathway of the terminal histo-blood group antigens [ABO(H)]. Type 1 chains are characterized by the Galβ1, 3GlcNAc linkage (represented in black), while type 2 chains display a Galβ1, 4GlcNAc linkage (represented between parentheses and in red). Monosaccharide symbols follow the Symbol Nomenclature for Glycans (Neelamegham et al., 2019). The antigens signed in the grey box (LeB, H-type 1, sLeA, and sLeX) are the structures recognized by H. pylori BabA and SabA adhesins.

The H phenotype is the most frequent worldwide (70%), particularly in Western Europe and North America (De Oliveira et al., 2017), and the expression of the ABO (H) blood-group antigens is dependent on the expression of the FUT2 gene, encoding the fucosyltransferase 2 (Heneghan et al., 1998; De Oliveira et al., 2017). Individuals that express the FUT2 gene are called secretors, due to the secretion of the corresponding blood-group antigens by mucin-secreting cells (Kelly et al., 1995; Serpa et al., 2004; Magalhaes et al., 2009; Silva et al., 2009; Magalhaes et al., 2016; De Oliveira et al., 2017).

For the secretor individuals, the ABO (H) antigens are expressed by epithelial cells present in many types of tissues (Orntoft et al., 1991; Tsukazaki et al., 1991; Murata et al., 1992; Teixeira et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2006). Due to this localization, these antigens can act as ligands to specific pathogens, such as H. pylori, one of the most studied human pathogens.

Role of Glycans in Host-Pathogen Interaction

The role of glycans in the recognition of pathogens has been widely studied for several types of microorganisms. Indeed, the interaction between the pathogen and the glycan receptors at the cell surface is the first step and is crucial for a successful colonization and infection (Kreisman and Cobb, 2012). The majority of pathogens present glycan binding proteins on their surface that will recognize and bind to specific receptors on the host cell membrane or mucous layer. One of the major players are the mucin O-glycans, which are essential for bacterial adhesion, in a species-specific manner (Ringot-Destrez et al., 2017). This binding is crucial for survival of the pathogen in the host microenvironment, since it will help to avoid the elimination by clearance mechanisms and to escape from the immune response (Kreisman and Cobb, 2012; Belotserkovsky et al., 2018). Indeed, the majority of the pathogens are able to modulate the expression of their lectins, in order to adapt to alterations in the host glycosylation profile observed for several diseases (Ringot-Destrez et al., 2017). Glycans have been implicated in host-pathogen interactions of several microorganisms, including viruses such as Influenza virus (Bateman et al., 2010; Air, 2014; Cohen et al., 2016; Byrd-Leotis et al., 2017; Mayr et al., 2018), Calicivirus (Bhella et al., 2008), and recently SARS-Cov-2 (Casalino et al., 2020; Clausen et al., 2020; Watanabe et al., 2020), as well as bacteria, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Barnes et al., 2017; Shukla et al., 2018; Fonseca et al., 2020; Matos et al., 2020), Pseudomonas eruginosa (Linden et al., 2008), Escherichia coli (Krishnan et al., 2014; Bottomley et al., 2020), Yersinia pestis, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Yersinia enterocolitica (Pakharukova et al., 2016) and H. pylori (Borén et al., 1994; Aspholm-Hurtig et al., 2004; Benktander et al., 2012).

Helicobacter pylori Adhesion to Human Gastric Mucosa: An Interaction Mediated by Glycans

Helicobacter pylori is a Gram-negative, microaerophilic, spiral-shaped bacterium, that colonizes the stomach of half of the worldwide human population (Altman et al., 2005; Magalhaes and Reis, 2010; Huang et al., 2016; Ansari and Yamaoka, 2017). A persistent infection with H. pylori results in chronic gastritis, which can evolve to peptic ulcers, precancerous lesions (atrophy, intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia) and gastric adenocarcinoma (Huang et al., 2016; Ansari and Yamaoka, 2017). Indeed, H. pylori is considered a group I carcinogen due to its strong association with gastric carcinoma, with a 2-8-fold increased risk vs. the non-infected population (Huang et al., 2016; Ansari and Yamaoka, 2017). Fortunately, in most cases, H. pylori infection remains asymptomatic, however 10% of the individuals develop severe gastric lesions and of these, 1–3% progresses to gastric carcinoma with a low 5-years survival rate (De Falco et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2016). Furthermore, H. pylori may also play a role in non-gastric diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes mellitus, hematologic disorders and asthma, which might be associated with changes in host immune response and human microbiome induced by an infection with this bacterium (Bravo et al., 2018; Menard and Smet, 2019; Gottesmann et al., 2020).

Infection with H. pylori is usually clustered in families, and individuals are normally infected during childhood and, if not eradicated, it can persist through individual’s lifetime (Clyne and May, 2019). The prevalence of this pathogen varies within the geographic region and depends on several factors, such as age, socio-economic status, educational level and hygiene (De Falco et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2016). The transmission mechanism is not completely known but it may occur via fecal-oral or oral-oral route (Huang et al., 2016; Ansari and Yamaoka, 2017).

H. pylori uses several virulence factors to colonize the human gastric mucosa (Ansari and Yamaoka, 2017). The virulence factors expressed by H. pylori include the CagA (cytotoxin-associated gene A) and the VacA (vacuolating cytotoxin A) molecules (Marcos et al., 2008; Ansari and Yamaoka, 2017). Besides these factors, the bacterial genome encodes a large number of outer membrane proteins (OMP), which are expressed at the bacterial cell envelop and can be divided into six families: the H. pylori OMP, the Hop-related, the Helicobacter OMP, the Helicobacter outer membrane (Hom), the iron-regulated OMPs and the efflux pump OMPs (Magalhaes and Reis, 2010; Ansari and Yamaoka, 2017; Bauwens et al., 2018). The majority of the OMPs belong to the Hop proteins, and can act as transport channels (porins) or adhesins such as the blood-group antigen binding adhesin (BabA) (Borén et al., 1993), the sialic acid-binding adhesin (SabA) (Borén et al., 1994), the lacdiNAc-binding adhesin (LabA) (Rossez et al., 2014), the adherence-associated lipoprotein A/B (AlpA/B) and the outer inflammatory protein A (OipA), the HopQ and the HopZ (Benktander et al., 2012; Ansari and Yamaoka, 2017; Bauwens et al., 2018; Benktander et al., 2018). The attachment of the adhesins present on the bacterial surface to the gastric mucus layer is the initial step and is crucial for the colonization and subsequent infection by H. pylori (Rossez et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2016; Ansari and Yamaoka, 2017). The binding to the gastric epithelium is essential for a successful colonization because it will protect the bacteria from clearance mechanisms, such as liquid flow, peristaltic movement, washing and mucus shedding (Aspholm et al., 2006; Huang et al., 2016; Ansari and Yamaoka, 2017). Additionally, attachment provides a source of nutrients to the bacteria and promotes the delivery of bacterial toxins or other virulence factors to the host cells, contributing to the development of a persistent infection (Aspholm et al., 2006; Ansari and Yamaoka, 2017) (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Pathogenesis of Helicobacter infection of the human gastric mucosa. (A) Interaction of H. pylori adhesins with the host cell receptors, and the virulence factors. (B) NHPH adhesins and virulence factors involved in the adhesion mechanism.

H. pylori can be classified based on its ability to bind to the blood-group antigens: specialist strains bind to blood-group O antigens, whereas the generalist strains bind to group O, A and B antigens (Ansari and Yamaoka, 2017). Besides this, the triple positive strains (BabA-, VacA- and CagA-positive) are associated with more severe gastric diseases, namely peptic ulcers and gastric carcinoma (Benktander et al., 2012; Benktander et al., 2018).

A successful infection occurs in two steps: 1) the bacteria reach the surface of the gastric mucosa, which has a nearly neutral pH, after crossing the mucus layer; and 2) the bacteria adhere to the gastric epithelial cells via the OMPs (Borén et al., 1994; Borén et al., 1993; Huang et al., 2016). The first interaction is mediated by the BabA adhesin, which recognizes and binds to fucosylated blood-group antigens H-type 1 and LeB (Borén et al., 1993; Ilver et al., 1998; McGuckin et al., 2011; Benktander et al., 2012). The LeB antigen, is the main receptor for the BabA adhesin, and it can be expressed on MUC5AC mucin, on MUC1 and MUC2 mucins (Ansari and Yamaoka, 2017; Mahdavi et al., 2013) (Table 1). The MUC5AC mucin is co-expressed with the LeB and LeA antigens by the gastric epithelial cells (Linden et al., 2008; Magalhaes et al., 2010; Ansari and Yamaoka, 2017). On the other hand, MUC6 mucin is co-expressed with the type 2 Lewis antigens (LeX and LeY) (Reis et al., 2000).

TABLE 1.

Helicobacter pylori adhesins and their described glycan ligands.

Adhesin Receptors identified Localization Reference
BabA Lewis b blood group antigen (LeB) and terminal fucose, H1-antigen, A-antigen and B-antigen Gastric epithelium Borén et al. (1993); Ilver et al. (1998); Benktander et al. (2012); McGuckin et al. (2011)
SabA sialyl-Lewis A blood group antigen (sLeA) Gastric epithelium Madhavi et al. (2002)
sialyl-Lewis X blood group antigen (sLeX) Gastric epithelium Madhavi et al. (2002)
LabA lacdiNAc motif Gastric epithelium Rossez et al. (2014); Benktander et al. (2018)

The binding mechanism of the H. pylori BabA adhesin to the carbohydrate receptors, more specifically to LeB, has been studied in detail. Recently, Moonens et al., revealed the X-ray structures of representative specialist and generalist BabA isoforms (Moonens et al., 2016). This analyses demonstrated that the preference shift results from a single amino acid substitution in the carbohydrate binding domain, which is constituted by one conserved loop (CL2) and two diversity loops (DL1 and DL2) (Moonens et al., 2016). In addition, it was showed that the DL1 is responsible for the specialist or generalist BabA binding: the specialist binds to the blood group O trough the CL2 and DL2 loops, while the binding of generalists involves the CL2 and both DL1 and DL2 (Moonens et al., 2016). Furthermore, the biophysical properties and the strength of the binding of the H. pylori BabA adhesin to the LeB antigen was evaluated by atomic force microscopy (Parreira et al., 2014). Detailed analysis showed the presence of two different bond populations, suggesting that the binding follows a two-state model, to improve the adhesion efficiency and stability (Parreira et al., 2014). Additionally, Hage et al., also evaluated the molecular aspects of the BabA-LeB interaction, showing that the binding involves two fucose residues (Fuc1 and Fuc4), two galactose residues (Gal2 and Gal5), one N-Acetylglucosamine residue (GlcNAc3) and one glucose residue (Glc6) (Hage N 2015). Furthermore, the amino acids in the BabA adhesin involved in the binding to each LeB glycan residue were also identified (Hage et al., 2015).

H. pylori is very sensitive to the low pH of the gastric fluid, and the bacteria use unique strategies to survive in this harsh microenvironment (Ansari and Yamaoka, 2017; Gottesmann et al., 2020). The helical shape and the flagella, along with the urease production, favors H. pylori entrance and penetration within the gastric mucus, following a pH gradient (Gottesmann et al., 2020). Recently, it has been described that the binding of the BabA adhesin to its ligands is also pH responsive (Bugaytsova et al., 2017). Given the acidic gastric environment, the adherence of H. pylori and its strength linkage to the ABO glycan antigens have been shown to be crucial for the survival in this unique environment (Bugaytsova et al., 2017). Under low pH, the linkage is suppressed, and the bacteria are released and relocated into a more neutral microenvironment, escaping to physiological events such as the shedding of epithelial cells and mucus turnover (Bugaytsova et al., 2017).

The non-secretor phenotype is characterized by the absence of ABO (H) antigens on gastric epithelial cells, which express only simple fucosylated Lewis structures (Heggelund et al., 2017). In these individuals, the colonization by H. pylori is mediated by the interaction between SabA and the sialylated glycans (Benktander et al., 2018), suggesting that the BabA-LeB interaction is important but not essential for colonization. However, it has been demonstrated that infection with H. pylori BabA-positive strains, as well the secretor status of the individual are associated with increased risk for development of peptic ulcer disease in Western countries, where the secretor phenotype prevails (Ansari and Yamaoka, 2017).

The majority of the bacteria are located in the gastric pits and in the mucus, and only a small amount colonizes deeper portions and are attached to gastric cells (Clyne and May, 2019). The specific localization of H. pylori has been widely investigated and some hypotheses have been formulated, based on the glycans expressed on this region. The deeper glands are characterized by the expression of MUC6 and α1, 4-GlcNAc residues, which are attached to core 2-branched O-glycans (Kawakubo et al., 2004; Ferreira et al., 2006). In vitro studies have demonstrated that the biosynthesis of a major H. pylori cell wall component can be inhibited by these α1, 4-GlcNAc-capped O-glycans, which can preclude bacterial growth, and function as a natural antibiotic (Kawakubo et al., 2004).

Colonization of the human gastric mucosa by H. pylori results in inflammation, which is accompanied by a remodeling of the glycosylation profile, with de novo expression of α2, 3-sialylated glycans, namely sialyl-Lewis A (sLeA) and sialyl-Lewis X (sLeX) (Mahdavi et al., 2002). These sialylated structures are recognized by SabA adhesin, which constitutes a second point of attachment to the host gastric mucosa and is important for the colonization process (Mahdavi et al., 2002; Linden et al., 2008; Magalhaes et al., 2015; Benktander et al., 2018) (Table 1).

An additional adhesin was suggested to play a role in H. pylori interaction with the human gastric mucosa: the lacdiNAc-binding adhesin (LabA) (Rossez et al., 2014; Benktander et al., 2018). This adhesin was first described as binding specifically to the lacdiNAc motif on MUC5AC mucins (Rossez et al., 2014). Recently, structural analysis of LabA suggested that the lacdiNAc motif might not be the ligand for this adhesin (Mthembu et al., 2020; Paraskevopoulou et al., 2021). Thus, the role of LabA and the binding specificity to lacdiNAc residues remains unclear and further studies are needed to elucidate this interaction (Mthembu et al., 2020; Paraskevopoulou et al., 2021).

The efficacy of the conventional H. pylori eradication therapy, usually a combination of 2-3 antibiotics with an acid-suppressive drug (Chey et al., 2017), has been declining in the last years, and the WHO considered priority the search for new drugs and alternative therapies (De et al., 2009; Blaecher et al., 2013). One of the major problems has been the acquisition of antimicrobial resistance, not only for H. pylori, but also for some NHPH such as H. heilmannii, H. ailurogastricus, H. felis and H. suis (Van den Bulck et al., 2005; Berlamont et al., 2019; Matos et al., 2020). The analysis of the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern is important to better understand the factors underneath the increasing resistance and to improve the available treatment.

On the other hand, since the search of new anti-adhesion drugs is urgent, the BabA mediated adhesion and the pH-responsive detachment and reattachment has been the aim of several anti-H. pylori adhesion studies. The first investigation were based on the anti-adhesive properties of the 3′-sialyllactose (Mysore et al., 1999; Parente et al., 2003), but this molecule was unable to prevent bacterial colonization. Additionally, several other molecules have been evaluated, including polyphenols (Shmuely et al., 2004; Hensel et al., 2007; Wittschier et al., 2007; Niehues et al., 2010), peptides (Niehues et al., 2010) and polysaccharides (Lengsfeld et al., 2007; Wittschier et al., 2009; Messing et al., 2014). The anti-adhesive properties of these molecules have been widely demonstrated however, it is not clear which bacterial OMPs are being targeted by each compound and which interactions are being blocked (Gottesmann et al., 2020). Besides these, another interesting approach is the use of glycans and their characteristics to produce antiadhesion microspheres, namely chitosan-microspheres (Gonçalves et al., 2013; Henriques et al., 2020) and glycan-coated microspheres (Goncalves et al., 2016) to impair H. pylori colonization.

Alternative Players in Helicobacter pylori Adhesion

The lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a structural component present in the outer cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria and may serve as a docking to the host cell (Gottesmann et al., 2020). The toxicity of the LPS from H. pylori is low compared to that of several other Gram-negative bacteria (Monteiro et al., 1998). One of the major components of the LPS is the O antigen composed of repeating units of sugars (Van Amersfoort et al., 2003). Biochemical analysis demonstrated that O antigen of H. pylori is homologous to the Lewis blood group antigens H-type 1, LeA, LeX and LeY (Monteiro et al., 1998; Altman et al., 2005). The expression of these structures in the bacterial surface mimics the glycans expressed by the gastric epithelial cells, which might be helpful in colonization (Altman et al., 2005). Furthermore, it has been suggested that the H. pylori O-antigen sidechains can induce the expression of LeX antigen, which may promote the adhesion of the bacteria to the gastric epithelial cells (Edwards et al., 2000; Mahdavi et al., 2003). However, the exact role of this antigen in the colonization process remains unknown (Mahdavi et al., 2003).

H. pylori also possess a type IV secretion system, which is helpful for the adhesion and fixation on the host cell surface (Chmiela and Kupcinskas 2019). The BabA-LeB interaction can also help in the bacterial fixation to the cell membrane, which will allow the transfer of bacterial virulence factors into the host cells (Gottesmann et al., 2020).

The H. pylori adhesion to the human gastric mucosa trough BabA and SabA adhesins is well-characterized (Jin et al., 2018). Detailed analysis of the glycoconjugates present in the human stomach, from individuals with different blood groups, showed a high degree of structural complexity. Furthermore, the composition of glycosphingolipids composition seems to be different according to the blood group, being the type 2 chains the dominant core chain (Jin et al., 2018). Interestingly, it was demonstrated that H. pylori did not bind to the O (Rh-) P blood group, whose major complex glycosphingolipids are the LeX, LeA and H-type 2 pentaosylceramides and LeY hexaosylceramides (Jin et al., 2018). In the other blood groups, glycosphingolipids present on the stomach of these individuals are able to bind to several H. pylori compounds (Jin et al., 2018).

Non-Helicobacter Pylori Helicobacters (NHPH) Adhesion: What Is the Mechanism and Which Molecules Are Involved?

H. pylori is the most prevalent Helicobacter species in the human stomach, however other gastric, spiral-shaped NHPH have also been associated with the development of gastric disorders in humans (Baele et al., 2008; Ali et al., 2018; Matos et al., 2020). NHPH have been detected in 0.2–6% of the human gastric biopsies, usually accompanied by gastritis, antral erosions, duodenal ulcers and gastric MALT lymphoma (Morgner et al., 2000; Haesebrouck et al., 2009; Joosten et al., 2016; Ali et al., 2018). So far, H. suis, H. felis, H. bizzozeronii, H. salomonis, and H. heilmannii are the NHPH species detected in the human stomach (Boyanova et al., 2003; Sýkora et al., 2003; Haesebrouck et al., 2009; Yakoob et al., 2012). H. suis is mainly associated with pigs and non-human primates, whereas the other gastric NHPH preferentially colonize the canine and feline stomach. However, occasionally they can cross the host species barrier and infect humans (Haesebrouck et al., 2009; Amorim et al., 2014; Bento-Miranda and Figueiredo, 2014; Liu et al., 2015). Compared to the natural hosts, NHPH colonization of the human stomach is lower and more focal (Haesebrouck et al., 2009).

Detailed analysis demonstrated that NHPH species lack major H. pylori adhesins described so far, such as BabA, SabA or AlpA/B (De Witte et al., 2016; Padra et al., 2018). The genome of H. bizzozeronii, H. felis, H. salomonis and H. heilmannii encodes several OMPs but lacks genes encoding the Bab and Sab adhesins (Arnold et al., 2011; Schott et al. 2011a; Smet et al., 2013). Furthermore, the alpA and alpB genes are not present in H. felis, H. heilmannii and H. bizzozeronnii (Odenbreit et al., 1999; Schott et al., 2011b). Even without the main molecules used by H. pylori for colonization, the NHPH species are still able to colonize the stomach from both humans and animals. So the question is: which are the adhesion molecules used by NHPH? The answer is not clear, and the full mechanisms and the intervenients remain to be elucidated.

Biochemical studies on H. heilmannii showed the expression of the OMPs HofE and HofF, which were identified as adhesins (Cheng et al., 2016) (Figure 2). These OMPS are involved in binding of this bacterium to the gastric mucosa. They present higher affinity to gastric epithelial cells than mucins, and they are essential for the activation of IL-1β which on its turn induces MUC13 expression on the gastric epithelium (Cheng et al., 2016; De Witte et al., 2016). H. suis is the most prevalent NHPH found in the human stomach (Haesebrouck et al., 2009; Padra et al., 2018) and a remarkable high prevalence of H. suis DNA (i.e. 27%) was detected in gastric biopsies from human patients with idiopathic parkinsonism (Blaecher et al., 2013). Like the other gastric NHPH, H. suis does not express major adhesins involved in colonization of the human stomach by H. pylori. However, it expresses some H. pylori similar OMPs, namely HorB and HpaA (H. pylori adhesin A) (Padra et al., 2018) (Figure 2). In vitro studies demonstrated that the porcine stomach expresses mucins at the surface epithelium, that resemble to human MUC5AC and MUC6 mucins and may constitute a binding site for H. suis (Padra et al., 2018). However, the identity of these mucins, the glycans and the specific H. suis adhesins are not known yet (Padra et al., 2018). Structural analysis of the porcine gastric mucins showed that these are large, oligomeric and highly glycosylated structures, similar to the human mucins (Aspholm et al., 2006). The major difference was at mucins sulfation level, that is very frequent among porcine mucins, but virtually absent in mucins of a healthy human stomach (Padra et al., 2018). This difference might help to explain the different colonization pattern of H. suis in the human and porcine stomach. Compared to the porcine stomach, colonization of the human stomach is indeed more limited and much more focal (Haesebrouck et al., 2009). Similar to the human stomach, a pH gradient across the mucus layer is observed in the porcine stomach, ranging from acidic in the lumen to neutral at the epithelial surface (Padra et al., 2018). Additionally, in vitro studies demonstrated that H. suis is able to bind to Galβ3GlcNAcβ4Glc glycoconjugates at neutral and acidic pH and binds to negatively charged glycans at acidic pH (Padra et al., 2018). Furthermore, it was observed that Galβ3GlcNAcβ3Galβ4Glc structures can inhibit the binding of H. suis to mucins (Padra et al., 2018).

H. suis and H. heilmannii are two NHPH species that have been widely studied and recently their in vitro adhesion ability to human gastric cell lines was evaluated (Berlamont et al., 2020). Interestingly, both Helicobacter species were able to bind to the gastric epithelial cells in vitro, but detailed analysis showed that frequently two genes were up-regulated and four genes were down-regulated in both pathogens (Berlamont et al., 2020). BLASTp analysis demonstrated that the genes differentially expressed by H. suis and H. heilmannii belong to several functional classes, which suggests that the in vitro adhesion of both strains to human gastric cells demands pleiotropic adaptive responses (Berlamont et al., 2020). However, the clinical significance of these findings and the complete pathway involved in the adhesion process needs to be better elucidated (Berlamont et al., 2020).

The canine gastric mucosa is one of the preferential niches for H. felis, H. bizzozeronii, H. heilmannii and, less often, H. salomonis (Amorim et al., 2014). Analysis of the canine glycophenotype showed that the canine gastric mucosa is characterized by absence of LeB and sLeA antigens expression and a slight expression of LeA (Amorim et al., 2014). The minor expression of type 1 Lewis antigens could be explained by the lack of α1, 4-fucosyltransferase activity in canine gastric epithelial cells (Kulhlmann et al., 1983; Amorim et al., 2014). On the other hand, type 2 Lewis antigens, mostly LeX and LeY are strongly expressed at the canine gastric superficial and foveolar epithelium (Amorim et al., 2014). Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the dog orthologous of human FUT3 and FUT5 genes present an arginine residue, which is compatible to the α1, 3-fucosyltransferase activity, instead of the α1, 4-fucosyltransferase observed in humans, further resulting in type 2 Lewis antigens biosynthesis by the dog gastric epithelial cells (Kulhlmann et al., 1983; Amorim et al., 2014). The different glycophenotype, together with the absence of BabA homologs, could explain the low infection rate by canine NHPH in humans, and concomitantly, the very rare colonization of dogs with H. pylori.

Both H. pylori and NHPH share virulence factors involved in epithelial cell death such as the ɣ-glutamyl transpeptidase (Haesebrouck et al., 2009). In addition, genes encoding homologues of other H. pylori virulence factors such as the secreted serine protease HtrA and the immunomodulator NapA are present in H. felis, H. bizzozeronnii and H. heilmannii s.s. genomes. In H. bizzozeronnii a polysaccharide lyase was regarded as a potential new virulence factor (Schott et al., 2011a). Later Kondadi et al. (Kondadi et al., 2012), characterized a novel lipopolysaccharide α2, 3-sialyltransferase from H. bizzozeronii that showed a preference for N-acetyllactosamine as a substrate. The authors showed that the expression of a terminal 3′sialyl-LacNAc on LPS is a phase-variable characteristic of both human- and canine derived H. bizzozeronii strains. Moreover, the authors suggest that this sialylated structure can mimic the surface glycans of the host mammalian cells (Kondadi et al., 2012).

Final Remarks

H. pylori infects half of the worldwide population, being associated with several gastric diseases. The interaction between H. pylori and the human gastric mucosa has been well characterized, and several intervenients have been described. The adhesion of H. pylori through the interaction of the BabA adhesin to both LeB and H-type 1 glycans, expressed by the gastric epithelial cells of healthy secretors, results in the initiation of an inflammatory response, with de novo synthesis of sialylated structures, such as sLeA and sLeX. These are carbohydrate antigens that are recognized by the SabA adhesin expressed at the bacterial surface. Gastric NHPH that are primary associated with pigs, dogs, and cats, may also colonize the human stomach resulting in gastric disorders. However, the precise adhesion mechanisms of NHPH, including the adhesins and ligands responsible for the colonization, are almost unknown. Further studies, including the screening of NHPH OMPs using glycan arrays will be very helpful in the identification of the players in adhesion, improving and contributing to a thorough knowledge about human NHPH infection.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the contribution of Mário Jorge Ribeiro (ICBAS-UP, Portugal), for the help on the illustration of Figure 2.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, CR and RM; writing-original draft preparation, RM; writing—review and editing, RM, AM, IA, FH, FG, and CR; supervision—CR. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by FEDER funds through the Operational Programme for Competitiveness Factors-COMPETE (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016585; POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007274); National Funds through the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), under the projects: PTDC/BBB-EBI/0567/2014 (to CR) and UID/BIM/04293/2013; RM is funded by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia/Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (FCT) PhD scholarship SFRH/BD/131159/2017. We also acknowledge the COST Action CA18103 INNOGLY: INNOvation with Glycans new frontiers from synthesis to new biological targets.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Air G. M. (2014). Influenza Virus-Glycan Interactions. Curr. Opin. Virol. 7, 128–133. 10.1016/j.coviro.2014.06.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ali B., Chloe W., Mehmet A., Sofie B., Annemieke S., Gokhan T., et al. (2018). Presence of Gastric Helicobacter Species in Children Suffering from Gastric Disorders in Southern Turkey. Helicobacter 23, e12511. 10.1111/hel.12511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Altman E., Harrison B. A., Hirama T., Chandan V., To R., MacKenzie R. (2005). Characterization of Murine Monoclonal Antibodies againstHelicobacter Pylorilipopolysaccharide Specific for Lexand Leyblood Group Determinants. Biochem. Cel Biol. 83, 589–596. 10.1139/o05-052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Amorim I., Freitas D. P., Magalhães A., Faria F., Lopes C., Faustino A. M., et al. (2014). A Comparison ofHelicobacter pyloriand Non-Helicobacter pylori Helicobacterspp. Binding to Canine Gastric Mucosa with Defined Gastric Glycophenotype. Helicobacter 19, 249–259. 10.1111/hel.12125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ansari S., Yamaoka Y. (2017). Helicobacter pyloriBabA in Adaptation for Gastric Colonization. Wjg 23, 4158–4169. 10.3748/wjg.v23.i23.4158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Arnold I. C., Zigova Z., Holden M., Lawley T. D., Rad R., Dougan G., et al. (2011). Comparative Whole Genome Sequence Analysis of the Carcinogenic Bacterial Model Pathogen Helicobacter felis. Genome Biol. Evol. 3, 302–308. 10.1093/gbe/evr022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Aspholm M., Kalia A., Ruhl S., Schedin S., Arnqvist A., Lindén S., et al. (2006) Helicobacter pylori Adhesion to carbohydrates. Functional Glycomics. 417, 293–339. 10.106/S0076-6879(06)17020-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Aspholm-Hurtig M., Dailide G., Lahmann M., Kalia A., Ilver D., Roche N., et al. (2004). Functional Adaptation of BabA, the H. pylori ABO Blood Group Antigen Binding Adhesin. Science 305, 519–522. 10.1126/science.1098801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Baele M., Decostere A., Vandamme P., Ceelen L., Hellemans A., Mast J., et al. (2008). Isolation and Characterization of Helicobacter Suis Sp. Nov. From Pig Stomachs. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 58, 1350–1358. 10.1099/ijs.0.65133-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Barnes D. D., Lundahl M. L. E., Lavelle E. C., Scanlan E. M. (2017). The Emergence of Phenolic Glycans as Virulence Factors in Mycobacterium Tuberculosis. ACS Chem. Biol. 12, 1969–1979. 10.1021/acschembio.7b00394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bateman A. C., Karamanska R., Busch M. G., Dell A., Olsen C. W., Haslam S. M. (2010). Glycan Analysis and Influenza A Virus Infection of Primary Swine Respiratory Epithelial Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 34016–34026. 10.1074/jbc.m110.115998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bauwens E., Joosten M., Taganna J., Rossi M., Debraekeleer A., Tay A., et al. (2018). In Silico Proteomic and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Outer Membrane Protein Repertoire of Gastric Helicobacter Species. Sci. Rep. 8, 15453. 10.1038/s41598-018-32476-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Belotserkovsky I., Brunner K., Pinaud L., Rouvinski A., Dellarole M., Baron B., et al. (2018). Glycan-Glycan Interaction Determines Shigella Tropism toward Human T Lymphocytes, mBio 9, e02309. 10.1128/mbio.02309-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Benktander J., Ångström J., Breimer M. E., Teneberg S. (2012). Redefinition of the Carbohydrate Binding Specificity of Helicobacter pylori BabA Adhesin. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 31712–31724. 10.1074/jbc.m112.387654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Benktander J., Barone A., Johansson M. M., Teneberg S. (2018). Helicobacter pylori SabA Binding Gangliosides of Human Stomach. Virulence 9, 738–751. 10.1080/21505594.2018.1440171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bennett E. P., Mandel U., Clausen H., Gerken T. A., Fritz T. A., Tabak L. A. (2012). Control of Mucin-type O-Glycosylation: A Classification of the Polypeptide GalNAc-Transferase Gene Family. Glycobiology 22, 736–756. 10.1093/glycob/cwr182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bento-Miranda M., Figueiredo C. (2014). Helicobacter Heilmannii Sensu Lato: An Overview of the Infection in Humans. Wjg 20, 17779–17787. 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Berlamont H., De Witte C., Bauwens E., Min Jou H., Ducatelle R., De Meester E., et al. (2020). Distinct Transcriptome Signatures of Helicobacter Suis and Helicobacter Heilmannii Strains upon Adherence to Human Gastric Epithelial Cells. Vet. Res. 51, 62. 10.1186/s13567-020-00786-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Berlamont H., Smet A., De Bruykere S., Boyen F., Ducatelle R., Haesebrouck F., et al. (2019). Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Helicobacter Suis Isolates from Pigs and Macaques. Vet. Microbiol. 239, 108459. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.108459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bhella D., Gatherer D., Chaudhry Y., Pink R., Goodfellow I. G. (2008). Structural Insights into Calicivirus Attachment and Uncoating. Jvi 82, 8051–8058. 10.1128/jvi.00550-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Blaecher C., Smet A., Flahou B., Pasmans F., Ducatelle R., Taylor D., et al. (2013). Significantly Higher Frequency ofHelicobacter Suisin Patients with Idiopathic Parkinsonism Than in Control Patients. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 38, 1347–1353. 10.1111/apt.12520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Borén T., Falk P., Roth K. A., Normak S. (1993). Attachment of Helicobacter pylori to Human Gastric Epithelium Mediated by Blood Group Antigens. Science 262. 1892–1895. 10.1126/science.808146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Borén T., Normak S., Falk P. (1994). Helicobacter pylori: Molecular Basis for Host Recognition and Bacterial Adherence. Trends Microbiol. 2 (7), 221–228. 10.1016/0966-842x(94)90626-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Bottomley A. L., Peterson E., Iosifidis G., Yong A. M. H., Hartley-Tassell L. E., Ansari S., et al. (2020). The Novel E. coli Cell Division Protein, YtfB, Plays a Role in Eukaryotic Cell Adhesion. Sci. Rep. 10, 6745. 10.1038/s41598-020-63729-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Boyanova L., Koumanova R., Lazarova E., Jelev C. (2003). Helicobacter pylori and Helicobacter Heilmannii in Children. A Bulgarian Study. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 46, 249–252. 10.1016/s0732-8893(03)00085-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bravo D., Hoare A., Soto C., Valenzuela M. A., Quest A. F. (2018). Helicobacter Pyloriin Human Health and Disease: Mechanisms for Local Gastric and Systemic Effects. Wjg 24, 3071–3089. 10.3748/wjg.v24.i28.3071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Bugaytsova J. A., Björnham O., Chernov Y. A., Gideonsson P., Henriksson S., Mendez M., et al. (2017). Helicobacter pylori Adapts to Chronic Infection and Gastric Disease via pH-Responsive BabA-Mediated Adherence. Cell Host & Microbe 21, 376–389. 10.1016/j.chom.2017.02.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Byrd-Leotis L., Cummings R. D., Steinhauer D. A. (2017). 'The Interplay between the Host Receptor and Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin and Neuraminidase. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18. 1541. 10.3390/ijms18071541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Casalino L., Gaieb Z., Goldsmith J. A., Hjorth C. K., Dommer A. C., Harbison A. M., et al. (2020). Shielding and beyond: The Roles of Glycans in SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein. bioRxiv. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cheng L., Mirko R., Sara L., Medea P., Caroline B., Eva B., et al. (2016). TheHelicobacter Heilmannii hofE and hofF Genes Are Essential for Colonization of the Gastric Mucosa and Play a Role in IL-1β-Induced Gastric MUC13 Expression. Helicobacter 21, 504–522. 10.1111/hel.12307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chey W. D., Leontiadis G. I., Howden C. W., Moss S. F. (2017). ACG Clinical Guideline: Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 112, 212–239. 10.1038/ajg.2016.563 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Chmiela M., Kupcinskas J. (2019). Review: Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori Infection. Helicobacter 24 (Suppl. 1), e12638. 10.1111/hel.12638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Clausen H., Hakomori S. I. (1989). ABH and Related Histo-Blood Group Antigens; Immunochemical Differences in Carrier Isotypes and Their Distribution. Vox Sanguinis 56, 1–20. 10.1159/000460912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Clausen T. M., Sandoval D. R., Spliid C. B., Pihl J., Perrett H. R., Painter C. D., et al. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 Infection Depends on Cellular Heparan Sulfate and ACE2. Cell 183, 1043–1057. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Clyne M., May F. E. B. (2019). The Interaction of Helicobacter pylori with TFF1 and its Role in Mediating the Tropism of the Bacteria within the Stomach. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20. 4400. 10.3390/ijms20184400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Cohen M., Fisher C. J., Huang M. L., Lindsay L. L., Plancarte M., Boyce W. M., et al. (2016). Capture and Characterization of Influenza A Virus from Primary Samples Using Glycan Bead Arrays. Virology 493, 128–135. 10.1016/j.virol.2016.03.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. De Falco M., Lucariello A., Iaquinto S., Esposito V., Guerra G., De Luca A. (2015). Molecular Mechanisms of Helicobacter pyloriPathogenesis. J. Cel. Physiol. 230, 1702–1707. 10.1002/jcp.24933 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. De Oliveira D. M., Hartley-Tassell L., Everest-Dass A., Day C. J., Dabbs R. A., Ve T., et al. (2017). Blood Group Antigen Recognition via the Group A Streptococcal M Protein Mediates Host Colonization, mBio 8, e02237. 10.1128/mbio.02237-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. De R., Kundu P., Swarnakar S., Ramamurthy T., Chowdhury A., Nair G. B., et al. (2009). Antimicrobial Activity of Curcumin against Helicobacter pylori Isolates from India and during Infections in Mice. Aac 53, 1592–1597. 10.1128/aac.01242-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. De Witte C., Schulz C., Smet A., Malfertheiner P., Haesebrouck F. (2016). Other Helicobacters and Gastric Microbiota. Helicobacter 21 (Suppl. 1), 62–68. 10.1111/hel.12343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Duarte H. O., Freitas D., Gomes C., Gomes J., Magalhaes A., Reis C. A. (2016). Mucin-Type O-Glycosylation in Gastric Carcinogenesis, Biomolecules 6. 33, 10.3390/biom6030033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Edwards N. J., Monteiro M. A., Faller G., Walsh E. J., Moran A. P., Roberts I. S., et al. (2000). Lewis X Structures in the O Antigen Side-Chain Promote Adhesion of Helicobacter pylori to the Gastric Epithelium. Mol. Microbiol. 35 (6), 1530–1539. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01823.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Eichler J. (2019). Protein Glycosylation. Curr. Biol. 29, R229–R231. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Endo T. (2019). Mammalian O-Mannosyl Glycans: Biochemistry and Glycopathology. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B: Phys. Biol. Sci. 95, 39–51. 10.2183/pjab.95.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Etzold S., Juge N. (2014). Structural Insights into Bacterial Recognition of Intestinal Mucins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 28, 23–31. 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ferreira B., Marcos N. T., David L., Nakayama J., Reis C. A. (2006). Terminal α1,4-linked N-Acetylglucosamine in Helicobacter Pylori-Associated Intestinal Metaplasia of the Human Stomach and Gastric Carcinoma Cell Lines. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 54, 585–591. 10.1369/jhc.5a6836.2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Fonseca K. L., Maceiras A. R., Matos R., Simoes-Costa L., Sousa J., Cá B., et al. (2020). Deficiency in the Glycosyltransferase Gcnt1 Increases Susceptibility to Tuberculosis through a Mechanism Involving Neutrophils. Mucosal Immunol. 13, 836–848. 10.1038/s41385-020-0277-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Formosa-Dague C., Castelain M., Martin-Yken H., Dunker K., Dague E., Sletmoen M. (2018). The Role of Glycans in Bacterial Adhesion to Mucosal Surfaces: How Can Single-Molecule Techniques Advance Our Understanding? Microorganisms, 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Gonçalves I. C., Magalhães A., Costa A. M. S., Oliveira J. R., Henriques P. C., Gomes P., et al. (2016). Bacteria-targeted Biomaterials: Glycan-Coated Microspheres to Bind Helicobacter pylori . Acta Biomater. 33, 40–50. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Gonçalves I. C., Magalhães A., Fernandes M., Rodrigues I. V., Reis C. A., Martins M. C. L. (2013). Ana Magalhães, Mariana Fernandes, Inês VBacterial-Binding Chitosan Microspheres for Gastric Infection Treatment and Prevention. Acta Biomater. 9, 9370–9378. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Gottesmann M., Paraskevopoulou V., Mohammed A., Falcone F. H., Hensel A. (2020). BabA and LPS Inhibitors against Helicobacter pylori: Pectins and Pectin-like Rhamnogalacturonans as Adhesion Blockers. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 104, 351–363. 10.1007/s00253-019-10234-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Haesebrouck F., Pasmans F., Flahou B., Chiers K., Baele M., Meyns T., et al. (2009). Gastric Helicobacters in Domestic Animals and Nonhuman Primates and Their Significance for Human Health. Cmr 22, 202–223. 10.1128/cmr.00041-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hage N., Howard T., Phillips C., Brassington C., Overman R., Debreczeni J., et al. (2015). Structural Basis of Lewis B Antigen Binding by the Helicobacter pylori Adhesin BabA. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500315. 10.1126/sciadv.1500315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Harduin-Lepers A., Krzewinski-Recchi M., Colomb F., Foulquier F., Groux-Degroote S., Delannoy P. (2012). Sialyltransferases Functions in Cancers. Front. Biosci. E4, 499–515. 10.2741/e396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Heggelund J. E., Varrot A., Imberty A., Krengel U. (2017). Histo-blood Group Antigens as Mediators of Infections. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 44, 190–200. 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Heneghan M. A., Moran A. P., Feeley K. M., Egan E. L., Goulding J., Connolly C. E., et al. (1998). Effect of Host Lewis and ABO Blood Group Antigen Expression onHelicobacter Pyloricolonisation Density and the Consequent Inflammatory Response. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 20, 257–266. 10.1111/j.1574-695x.1998.tb01135.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Henriques P. C., Costa L. M., Seabra C. L., Antunes B., Silva-Carvalho R., Junqueira-Neto S., et al. (2020). Orally Administrated Chitosan Microspheres Bind Helicobacter pylori and Decrease Gastric Infection in Mice. Acta Biomater. 114, 206–220. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Hensel A., Deters A., Müller G., Stark T., Wittschier N., Hofmann T. (2007). Occurrence of N-Phenylpropenoyl-L-Amino Acid Amides in Different Herbal Drugs and Their Influence on Human Keratinocytes, on Human Liver Cells and on Adhesion of Helicobacter pylori to the Human Stomach. Planta Med. 73, 142–150. 10.1055/s-2006-957079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Hollingsworth M. A., Swanson B. J. (2004). Mucins in Cancer: Protection and Control of the Cell Surface. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 45–60. 10.1038/nrc1251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Huang Y., Wang Q. L., Cheng D. D., Xu W. T., Lu N. H. (2016). Adhesion and Invasion of Gastric Mucosa Epithelial Cells by Helicobacter pylori . Front Cel Infect Microbiol 6, 159. 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Ilver D., Arnqvist A., Ogren J., Frick I. M., Kersulyte D., Incecik E. T., et al. (1998). Helicobacter pylori Adhesin Binding Fucosylated Histo-Blood Group Antigens Revealed by Retagging. Science 279, 373–377. 10.1126/science.279.5349.373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Jin C., Barone A., Borén T., Teneberg S. (2018). Helicobacter Pylori-Binding Nonacid Glycosphingolipids in the Human Stomach. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 17248–17266. 10.1074/jbc.ra118.004854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Joosten M., Lindén S., Rossi M., Tay A. C. Y., Skoog E., Padra M., et al. (2016). Divergence between the Highly Virulent Zoonotic Pathogen Helicobacter Heilmannii and its Closest Relative, the Low-Virulence “Helicobacter Ailurogastricus” Sp. Nov. Infect. Immun. 84, 293–306. 10.1128/iai.01300-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Kawakubo M., Ito Y., Okimura Y., Kobayashi M., Sakura K., Kasama S., et al. (2004). Natural Antibiotic Function of a Human Gastric Mucin against Helicobacter pylori Infection. Science 305, 1003–1006. 10.1126/science.1099250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Kelly R. J., Rouquier S., Giorgi D., Lennon G. G., Lowe J. B. (1995). Sequence and Expression of a Candidate for the Human Secretor Blood Group α (1,2) Fucosyltransferase Gene (FUT2). J. Biol. Chem. 270 (9), 4640–4649. 10.1074/jbc.270.9.4640 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Koda Y., Soejima M., Liu Y., Kimura H. (1996). Molecular Basis for Secretor Type Alpha(1,2)-Fucosyltransferase Gene Deficiency in a Japanese Population: a Fusion Gene Generated by Unequal Crossover Responsible for the Enzyme Deficiency. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 59, 343–350. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kondadi P. K., Rossi M., Twelkmeyer B., Schur M. J., Li J., Schott T., et al. (2012). Identification and Characterization of a Lipopolysaccharide ,2,3-Sialyltransferase from the Human Pathogen Helicobacter Bizzozeronii. J. Bacteriol. 194, 2540–2550. 10.1128/jb.00126-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Kreisman L. S., Cobb B. A. (2012). Infection, Inflammation and Host Carbohydrates: A Glyco-Evasion Hypothesis. Glycobiology 22, 1019–1030. 10.1093/glycob/cws070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Krishnan S., Liu F., Abrol R., Hodges J., Goddard W. A., 3rd, Prasadarao N. V. (2014). The Interaction of N-Glycans in Fcγ Receptor I α-Chain with Escherichia coli K1 Outer Membrane Protein A for Entry into Macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 30937–30949. 10.1074/jbc.m114.599407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Kulhlmann W. D., Peschke P., Wurster K. (1983). Lectin—Peroxidase Conjugates in Histopathology of Gastrointestinal Mucosa. Virchows Arch. Path Anat. 398 (3): 319–328. 10.1007/BF00583588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Le Pendu J., Lemieux R. U., Lambert F., Dalix A., Oriol R. (1982). Distribution of H Type 1 and H Type 2 Antigenic Determinants in Human Sera and Saliva. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 34, 402–415. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Le Pendu J., Ruvoën-Clouet N. (2020). Fondness for Sugars of Enteric Viruses Confronts Them with Human Glycans Genetic Diversity. Hum. Genet. 139, 903–910. 10.1007/s00439-019-02090-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Lee H., Choe G., Kim W., Kim H., Song J., Park K. (2006). Expression of Lewis Antigens and Their Precursors in Gastric Mucosa: Relationship withHelicobacter Pylori Infection and Gastric Carcinogenesis. J. Pathol. 209, 88–94. 10.1002/path.1949 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Lengsfeld C., Faller G., Hensel A. (2007). Okra Polysaccharides Inhibit Adhesion of Campylobacter Jejuni to Mucosa Isolated from Poultry In Vitro but Not In Vivo . Anim. Feed Sci. Techn. 135, 113–125. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.11.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Linden S. K., Sutton P., Karlsson N. G., Korolik V., McGuckin M. A. (2008). Mucins in the Mucosal Barrier to Infection. Mucosal Immunol. 1, 183–197. 10.1038/mi.2008.5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Liu J., He L., Haesebrouck F., Gong Y., Flahou B., Cao Q., et al. (2015). Prevalence of Coinfection with Gastric Non-Helicobacter pylori Helicobacter(NHPH) Species inHelicobacter pylori-infected Patients Suffering from Gastric Disease in Beijing, China. Helicobacter 20, 284–290. 10.1111/hel.12201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Magalhães A., Gomes J., Ismail M. N., Haslam S. M., Mendes N., Osório H., et al. (2009). Fut2-null Mice Display an Altered Glycosylation Profile and Impaired BabA-Mediated Helicobacter pylori Adhesion to Gastric Mucosa. Glycobiology 19, 1525–1536. 10.1093/glycob/cwp131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Magalhães A., Ismail M. N., Reis C. A. (2010). Sweet Receptors Mediate the Adhesion of the Gastric pathogenHelicobacter Pylori: Glycoproteomic Strategies. Expert Rev. Proteomics 7, 307–310. 10.1586/epr.10.18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Magalhães A., Marcos-Pinto R., Nairn A. V., Dela Rosa M., Ferreira R. M., Junqueira-Neto S., et al. (2015). Helicobacter pylori Chronic Infection and Mucosal Inflammation Switches the Human Gastric Glycosylation Pathways. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (Bba)—Mol. Basis Dis. 1852, 1928–1939. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Magalhães A., Reis C. A. (2010). Helicobacter pylori Adhesion to Gastric Epithelial Cells Is Mediated by Glycan Receptors. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 43, 611–618. 10.1590/s0100-879x2010007500049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Magalhaes A., Rossez Y., Robbe-Masselot C., Maes E., Gomes J., Shevtsova A., et al. (2016). Muc5ac Gastric Mucin Glycosylation Is Shaped by FUT2 Activity and Functionally Impacts Helicobacter pylori Binding. Sci. Rep. 6, 25575. 10.1038/srep25575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Mahdavi J., Borén T., Vandenbroucke-Grauls C., Appelmelk B. J. (2003). Limited Role of Lipopolysaccharide Lewis Antigens in Adherence of Helicobacter pylori to the Human Gastric Epithelium. Iai 71, 2876–2880. 10.1128/iai.71.5.2876-2880.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Mahdavi J., Sonden B., Hurtig M., Olfat F. O., Forsberg L., Roche N., et al. (2002). Helicobacter pylori SabA Adhesin in Persistent Infection and Chronic Inflammation. Science 297, 573–578. 10.1126/science.1069076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Mahdavi M. R., Amami A., Taghvaie T., Roshan P., Hojjati M. T., Mahdavi M., et al. (2013). Is There Any Relationship between Leb Antigen Expression and Helicobacter pylori Infection? Blood Cell Mol. Dis. 51, 174–176. 10.1016/j.bcmd.2013.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Marcos N. T., Magalhaes A., Ferreira B., Oliveira M. J., Carvalho A. S., Mendes N., et al. (2008). Helicobacter pylori Induces beta3GnT5 in Human Gastric Cell Lines, Modulating Expression of the SabA Ligand Sialyl-Lewis X. J. Clin. Invest. 118, 2325–2336. 10.1172/JCI34324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Matos R., De Witte C., Smet A., Berlamont H., De Bruyckere S., Amorim I., et al. (2020). Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Helicobacter Heilmannii and Helicobacter Ailurogastricus Isolates. Microorganisms 8. 957. 10.3390/microorganisms8060957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Mayr J., Lau K., Lai J. C. C., Gagarinov I. A., Shi Y., McAtamney S., et al. (2018). Unravelling the Role of O-Glycans in Influenza A Virus Infection. Sci. Rep. 8, 16382. 10.1038/s41598-018-34175-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. McGuckin M. A., Lindén S. K., Sutton P., Florin T. H. (2011). Mucin Dynamics and Enteric Pathogens. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 265–278. 10.1038/nrmicro2538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Menard A., Smet A. (2019). Review: Other Helicobacter Species. Helicobacter 24 (Suppl. 1), e12645. 10.1111/hel.12645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Mereiter S., Balmaña M., Campos D., Gomes J., Reis C. A. (2019). Glycosylation in the Era of Cancer-Targeted Therapy: Where Are We Heading? Cancer Cell 36, 6–16. 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Messing J., Thole C., Niehues M., Shevtsova A., Glocker E., Boren T., et al. (2014). Antiadhesive Properties of Abelmoschus Esculentus (Okra) Immature Fruit Extract against Helicobacter pylori Adhesion. PLoS One 9, e84836. 10.1371/journal.pone.0084836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Monteiro M. A., Chan K., Rasko D., Taylor D., Zheng P., Appelmelk B. J., et al. (1998). Simultaneous Expression of Type 1 and Type 2 Lewis Blood Group Antigens by Helicobacter pylori Lipopolysaccharides. J. Biol. Chem. 273 (9), 11533–11543. 10.1074/jbc.273.19.11533 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Moonens K., Gideonsson P., Subedi S., Bugaytsova J., Romaõ E., Mendez M., et al. (2016). Structural Insights into Polymorphic ABO Glycan Binding by Helicobacter pylori . Cell Host & Microbe 19, 55–66. 10.1016/j.chom.2015.12.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Moremen K. W., Tiemeyer M., Nairn A. V. (2012). Vertebrate Protein Glycosylation: Diversity, Synthesis and Function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cel Biol 13, 448–462. 10.1038/nrm3383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Morgner A., Lehn N., Andersen L. P., Thiede C., Bennedsen M., Trebesius K., et al. (2000). Helicobacter Heilmannii-Associated Primary Gastric Low-Grade MALT Lymphoma: Complete Remission after Curing the Infection. Gastroenterology 118, 821–828. 10.1016/s0016-5085(00)70167-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Mthembu Y. H., Jin C., Padra M., Liu J., Edlund J. O., Ma H., et al. (2020). Recombinant Mucin-type Proteins Carrying LacdiNAc on Different O-Glycan Core Chains Fail to Support H. pylori Binding. Mol. Omics 16, 243–257. 10.1039/c9mo00175a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Murata K., Egami H., Shibata Y., Sakamoto K., Misumi A., Ogawa M. (1992). Expression of Blood Group-Related Antigens, ABH, Lewisa, Lewisb, Lewisx, Lewisy, CA19-9, and CSLEX1 in Early Cancer, Intestinal Metaplasia, and Uninvolved Mucosa of the Stomach. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 98, 67–75. 10.1093/ajcp/98.1.67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Mysore J. V., Wigginton T., Simon P. M., Zopf D., Heman-Ackah L. M., Dubois A. (1999). Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Rhesus Monkeys Using a Novel Antiadhesion Compound. Gastroenterology 117, 1316–1325. 10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70282-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Neelamegham S., Aoki-Kinoshita K., Bolton E., Frank M., Lisacek F., Lütteke T. Snfg Discussion Group (2019). Updates to the Symbol Nomenclature for Glycans Guidelines. Glycobiology 29, 620–624. 10.1093/glycob/cwz045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Niehues M., Euler M., Georgi G., Mank M., Stahl B., Hensel A. (2010). Peptides from Pisum Sativum L. Enzymatic Protein Digest with Anti-adhesive Activity against Helicobacter pylori : Structure-Activity and Inhibitory Activity against BabA, SabA, HpaA and a Fibronectin-Binding Adhesin. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 54, 1851–1861. 10.1002/mnfr.201000021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Odenbreit S., Till M., Hofreuter D., Faller G., Haas R. (1999). Genetic and Functional Characterization of the alpAB Gene Locus Essential for the Adhesion of Helicobacter pylori to Human Gastric Tissue. Mol. Microbiol. 31 (5), 1537–1548. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01300.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Oriol R., Pendu J., Mollicone R. (1986). Genetics of ABO, H, Lewis, X and Related Antigens. Vox Sang 51, 161–171. 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1986.tb01946.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Orntoft T., Holmes E., Johnson P., Hakomori S., Clausen H. (1991). Differential Tissue Expression of the Lewis Blood Group Antigens: Enzymatic, Immunohistologic, and Immunochemical Evidence for Lewis a and B Antigen Expression in Le (a-B-) Individuals. Blood 77 (6), 1389–1396. 10.1182/blood.v77.6.1389.1389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Padra M., Adamczyk B., Benktander J., Flahou B., Skoog E. C., Padra J. T., et al. (2018). Helicobacter Suis Binding to Carbohydrates on Human and Porcine Gastric Mucins and Glycolipids Occurs via Two Modes. Virulence 9, 898–918. 10.1080/21505594.2018.1460979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Pakharukova N., Roy S., Tuittila M., Rahman M. M., Paavilainen S., Ingars A.-K., et al. (2016). Structural Basis for Myf and Psa Fimbriae-Mediated Tropism of Pathogenic Strains of Yersiniafor Host Tissues. Mol. Microbiol. 102, 593–610. 10.1111/mmi.13481 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Paraskevopoulou V., Schimpl M., Overman R. C., Stolnik S., Chen Y., Nguyen L., et al. (2021). Structural and Binding Characterization of the LacdiNAc-specific Adhesin (LabA; HopD) Exodomain from Helicobacter pylori . Curr. Res. Struct. Biol. 3, 19–29. 10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Parente F., Cucino C., Anderloni A., Grandinetti G., Porro G. B. (2003). Treatment of Helicobacter Pylori Infection Using a Novel Antiadhesion Compound (3'sialyllactose Sodium Salt). A Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study. Helicobacter 8, 252–256. 10.1046/j.1523-5378.2003.00152.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Parreira P., Shi Q., Magalhaes A., Reis C. A., Bugaytsova J., Borén T., et al. (2014). Atomic Force Microscopy Measurements Reveal Multiple Bonds between Helicobacter pylori Blood Group Antigen Binding Adhesin and Lewis B Ligand. J. R. Soc. Interf. 11, 20141040. 10.1098/rsif.2014.1040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Pinho S. S., Reis C. A. (2015). Glycosylation in Cancer: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications. Nat. Rev. Cancer 15, 540–555. 10.1038/nrc3982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Reis C. A., david L., Correa P., Carneiro F., Bolós C., Garcia E., Mandel U., Clausen H. (1999). Intestinal Metaplasia of Human Stomach Displays Distinct Patterns of Mucin (MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6) Expression. Cancer Res. 59 (5):1003–1007. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Reis C. A., David L., Carvalho F., Mandel U., Bolós C. d., Mirgorodskaya E., et al. (2000). Immunohistochemical Study of the Expression of MUC6 Mucin and Co-expression of Other Secreted Mucins (MUC5AC and MUC2) in Human Gastric Carcinomas. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 48, 377–388. 10.1177/002215540004800307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Reis C. A., David L., Nielsen P. A., Clausen H., Mirgorodskaya K., Roepstorff P., et al. (1997). Immunohistochemical Study of MUC5AC Expression in Human Gastric Carcinomas Using a Novel Monoclonal Antibody. Int. J. Cancer 74, 112–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Ringot-Destrez B., Kalach N., Mihalache A., Gosset P., Michalski J.-C., Léonard R., et al. (2017). How Do They Stick Together? Bacterial Adhesins Implicated in the Binding of Bacteria to the Human Gastrointestinal Mucins. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 45, 389–399. 10.1042/bst20160167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Rossez Y., Gosset P., Boneca I. G., Magalhães A., Ecobichon C., Reis C. A., et al. (2014). The LacdiNAc-specific Adhesin LabA Mediates Adhesion of Helicobacter pylori to Human Gastric Mucosa. J. Infect. Dis. 210, 1286–1295. 10.1093/infdis/jiu239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Schjoldager K. T., Narimatsu Y., Joshi H. J., Clausen H. (2020). Global View of Human Protein Glycosylation Pathways and Functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cel Biol.21, 729–749. 10.1038/s41580-020-00294-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Schott T., Kondadi P. K., Hanninen M. L., Rossi M. (2011a). Comparative Genomics of Helicobacter pylori and the Human-Derived Helicobacter Bizzozeronii CIII-1 Strain Reveal the Molecular Basis of the Zoonotic Nature of Non-pylori Gastric Helicobacter Infections in Humans. BMC Genomics 12, 534. 10.1186/1471-2164-12-534 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Schott T., Rossi M., Hanninen M.-L. (2011b). Genome Sequence of Helicobacter bizzozeroniiStrain CIII-1, an Isolate from Human Gastric Mucosa. J. Bacteriol. 193, 4565–4566. 10.1128/jb.05439-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Serpa J., Mendes N., Reis C. A., Santos Silva L. F., Almeida R., Le Pendu J., et al. (2004). Two New FUT2 (Fucosyltransferase 2 Gene) Missense Polymorphisms, 739G→A and 839T→C, Are Partly Responsible for Non-secretor Status in a Caucasian Population from Northern Portugal. Biochem. J. 383, 469–474. 10.1042/bj20040803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Shmuely H., Burger O., Neeman I., Yahav J., Samra Z., Niv Y., et al. (2004). Susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori Isolates to the Antiadhesion Activity of a High-Molecular-Weight Constituent of Cranberry. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 50, 231–235. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2004.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Shukla S., Richardson E. T., Drage M. G., Boom W. H., Harding C. V. (2018). Mycobacterium tuberculosisLipoprotein and Lipoglycan Binding to Toll-like Receptor 2 Correlates with Agonist Activity and Functional Outcomes. Infect. Immun. 86, e00450–18. 10.1128/iai.00450-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Silva L. M., Carvalho A. S., Guillon P., Seixas S., Azevedo M., Almeida R., et al. (2009). Infection-associated FUT2 (Fucosyltransferase 2) Genetic Variation and Impact on Functionality Assessed by In Vivo Studies. Glycoconj J. 27, 61–68. 10.1007/s10719-009-9255-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Smet A., Van Nieuwerburgh F., Ledesma J., Flahou B., Deforce D., Ducatelle R., et al. (2013). Genome Sequence of Helicobacter Heilmannii Sensu Stricto ASB1 Isolated from the Gastric Mucosa of a Kitten with Severe Gastritis. Genome Announc 1, e00033. 10.1128/genomea.00033-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Sýkora J., Hejda V., Varvarovská J., Stozicky F., Gottrand F., Siala K. (2003). Helicobacter Heilmannii Related Gastric Ulcer in Childhood. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 36, 410–413. 10.1097/00005176-200303000-00022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Symmes B. A., Stefanski A. L., Magin C. M., Evans C. M. (2018). Role of Mucins in Lung Homeostasis: Regulated Expression and Biosynthesis in Health and Disease. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 46, 707–719. 10.1042/bst20170455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Teixeira A., David L., Reis C. A., Costa J., Sobrinho-Simões M. (2002). Expression of Mucins (MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6) and Type 1 Lewis Antigens in Cases with and withoutHelicobacter Pyloricolonization in Metaplastic Glands of the Human Stomach. J. Pathol. 197, 37–43. 10.1002/path.1083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Thompson A. J., de Vries R. P., Paulson J. C. (2019). Virus Recognition of Glycan Receptors. Curr. Opin. Virol. 34, 117–129. 10.1016/j.coviro.2019.01.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Torrado J., Plummer M., Vivas J., Garay J., Lopez G., Peraza S., et al. (2000). Lewis Antigen Alterations in a Population at High Risk of Stomach Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 9, 671–674. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Tsukazaki K., Sakayori M., Arai H., Yamaoka K., Kurihara S., Nozawa S. (1991). Abnormal Expression of Blood Group-Related Antigens in Uterine Endometrial Cancers. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 82, 934–941. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1991.tb01924.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Van Amersfoort E. S., Van Berkel T. J. C., Kuiper J. (2003). Receptors, Mediators, and Mechanisms Involved in Bacterial Sepsis and Septic Shock. Cmr 16, 379–414. 10.1128/cmr.16.3.379-414.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Van den Bulck K., Decostere A., Gruntar I., Baele M., Krt B., Ducatelle R., et al. (2005). In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Helicobacter felis, H. Bizzozeronii, and H. Salomonis, Aac 49, 2997–3000. 10.1128/aac.49.7.2997-3000.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Watanabe Y., Allen J. D., Wrapp D., McLellan J. S., Crispin M. (2020). Site-specific Glycan Analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike. Science 369, 330–333. 10.1126/science.abb9983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Wittschier N., Faller G., Hensel A. (2007). An Extract of Pelargonium Sidoides (EPs 7630) Inhibits In Situ Adhesion of Helicobacter pylori to Human Stomach. Phytomedicine 14, 285–288. 10.1016/j.phymed.2006.12.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Watkins W. M. (1980). Biochemistry and Genetics of the ABO, Lewis, and P Blood Group Systems. Adv. Hum. Genet. 10 (1–396), 1–85. 10.1007/978-1-4615-8288-5_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Yakoob J., Abbas Z., Khan R., Naz S., Ahmad Z., Islam M., et al. (2012). Prevalence of Non Helicobacter pylori Species in Patients Presenting with Dyspepsia. BMC Gastroenterol. 12, 3. 10.1186/1471-230x-12-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Yamamoto F.-I., Clausen H., White T., Marken J., Hakomori S.-I. (1990). Molecular Genetic Basis of the Histo-Blood Group ABO System. Nature 345, 229–233. 10.1038/345229a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES