Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 May 21;16(5):e0248156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248156

Using geographically weighted regression analysis to cluster under-nutrition and its predictors among under-five children in Ethiopia: Evidence from demographic and health survey

Amare Muche 1, Mequannent Sharew Melaku 2,*, Erkihun Tadesse Amsalu 1, Metadel Adane 3
Editor: Srinivas Goli4
PMCID: PMC8139501  PMID: 34019545

Abstract

Background

Malnutrition among under-five children is a common public health problem and it is one of the main cause for the mortality of under-five children in developing countries, including Ethiopia. Therefore, lack of evidence about geographic heterogeneity and predictors of under-nutrition hinders for evidence-based decision-making process for the prevention and control programs of under-nutrition in Ethiopia. Thus, this study aimed to address this gap.

Methods

The data were obtained from the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) 2016. A total of 9,384 under-five children nested in 645 clusters were included with a stratified two-stage cluster sampling. ArcGIS version 10.5 software was used for global, local and ordinary least square analysis and mapping. The spatial autocorrelation (Global Moran’s I) statistic was held in order to assess the pattern of wasting, stunting, and underweight whether it was dispersed, clustered, or randomly distributed. In addition, a Bernoulli model was used to analyze the purely spatial cluster detection of under-nutrition indicators through SaTScan version 9.6 software. Geographically weighted regression (GWR) version 4.0 software was used to model spatial relationships in the GWR analysis. Finally, a statistical decision was made at p-value<0.05 with 95%CI for ordinary least square analysis and geographically weighted regression.

Main findings

Childhood under-nutrition showed geographical variations at zonal levels in Ethiopia. Accordingly, Somali region (Afder, Gode, Korahe, Warder Zones), Afar region (Zone 2), Tigray region (Southern Zone), and Amhara region (Waghmira Zones) for wasting, Amhara region (West Gojam, Awi, South Gondar, and Waghmira Zones) for stunting and Amhara region (South Wollo, North Wollo, Awi, South Gondar, and Waghmira zones), Afar region (Zone 2), Tigray region (Eastern Zone, North Western Zone, Central Zone, Southern Zone, and Mekele Special Zones), and Benshangul region (Metekel and Assosa Zones) for underweight were detected as hot spot (high risk) regions. In GWR analysis, had unimproved toilet facility for stunting, wasting and underweight, father had primary education for stunting and wasting, father had secondary education for stunting and underweight, mothers age 35–49 years for wasting and underweight, having female children for stunting, having children eight and above for wasting, and mother had primary education for underweight were significant predictors at (p<0.001).

Conclusions

Our study showed that the spatial distribution of under-nutrition was clustered and high-risk areas were identified in all forms of under-nutrition indicators. Predictors of under-nutrition were identified in all forms of under-nutrition indicators. Thus, geographic-based nutritional interventions mainly mobilizing additional resources could be held to reduce the burden of childhood under-nutrition in hot spot areas. In addition, improving sanitation and hygiene practice, improving the life style of the community, and promotion of parent education in the identified hot spot zones for under-nutrition should be more emphasized.

Background

Globally, under-five children are the most vulnerable segment of the population [1]. Under nutrition is one of the most public health burdens in developing countries. It includes stunting, wasting, and under-weight [2] and is determined through measurements of height, weight, and age [3,4].

Stunting has been defined as a child who is too short for their age [5]. Globally, stunting affected about 149 million under-five children in 2018. Of these 55% of stunted children lived in Asia and 39% lived in Africa [6]. Currently, in Ethiopia, the prevalence is estimated to be about 38% among under-five children [7].

Wasting has been also defined as a child who is too thin for their height. In 2018, worldwide wasting contributed to threaten the lives of an estimated 49 million under-five children. Of these, more than two-thirds of all wasted children are found in Asia and more than one quarter found in Africa [6]. The latest recent study in Ethiopia showed that the prevalence is estimated to be about 10% among under-five children [7].

Similarly, under-weight refers a child who is too small for his/her age which is the weight for age < -2 standard deviation(SD) of the WHO Child Growth Standards median [4,8]. Consecutively, the recent report in Ethiopia indicated that `the prevalence is estimated to be about 24% among under-five children. The results of impaired growth and development in children can be life long and reduce academic performance and the ability to contribute to the nation [5]. Many factors contribute to child under-nutrition including inadequate diet and poor infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices, a high burden of infectious disease, and a lack of basic infrastructure to enabling access to clean water, sanitation, and health services [911].

Different studies have been conducted to explore the spatial distributions of communicable diseases [1220]. The application of spatial analysis to non-communicable diseases has become a common practice to date [2123]. Consecutively, previous studies revealed that spatial variation of under-nutrition among under-five children [2426]. Similarly, studies conducted in Ethiopia have also showed the spatial variation of childhood stunting [2729]. However, spatial studies on under-nutrition status of children are limited and lack modeling of spatial relationships between the identified clusters of under-nutrition and its predictors.

Thus, understanding the area-based heterogeneity and factors affecting under-nutrition is a footstep for evidence-based decision-making in under-nutrition prevention and control programs. In addition, detecting spatial variation is also useful to recognize gaps in the performance of program on childhood nutrition that could not be identified through the routine monitoring of the nutritional status of children. Hence, this study aimed to explore the geographical variation of under-nutrition and its predictors among under-five children in Ethiopia using geographically weighted regression analysis.

Methods

Study setting

Ethiopia is found in the horn of Africa covering 1,104,300 km2 and ranks 10th in Africa in land coverage. Ethiopia is a country with a great geographical diversity ranging from peaks up to 4,550 m above sea level down to a depression of 110 m below sea level. Ethiopia has nine administrative regions (Tigray, Afar, Amhara, Oromia, Somalia, Benishangul Gumuz, Gambella, Somalia, Harari and SNNPR) and two city administrations namely Diredawa and Addis-Ababa (Fig 1). The country is divided into 68 zones, 817 districts, and 16,253 kebeles based on the report of 2010 Ethiopian fiscal year. Contextually, it is categorized as agrarian, pastoralists and city-based population. It has a total of 104,957,000 populations, of which 36,296,657 were women. Majority of the population about, 83.6% living in rural areas and 16.7% of the population reside in urban areas. The average household size in national level is 4.7 persons [30]. The country has fertility rate of 4.6, infant mortality rate (per 1,000 live births) of 48, and child mortality rate (per 1,000 live births) of 67 children deaths. We used the 2016 EDHS data for this study. The EDHS waive was conducted from January 18 2016 to June 27, 2016 [7].

Fig 1. Map of the study area.

Fig 1

Population

All children aged 0 to 59 months living in Ethiopia were considered as a source population and the study population includes all under-five children in the selected Enumeration areas during the EDHS data collection. A total of 9,384 children aged 0 to 59 months who full fill the inclusion criteria were considered for the entire analysis.

To select study participants, a stratified, two-stage cluster sampling technique was employed for the 2016 EDHS. Enumeration areas (EAs) were the sampling units for the first stage and households were the sampling unit for the second stage. In the 2016 EDHS, a total of 645 EAs (202 urban and 443 rural) were selected with a probability proportional to EAs size (based on the 2007 housing and population census) and independent selection in each sampling stratum. Of these, 18,008 households and 16,583 eligible women were included. The detailed sampling procedure was presented in the full EDHS report [7].

The 2016 EDHS spatial data (latitude and longitude coordinates) was used for this study. It was taken from the selected enumeration areas during the data collection period. From a total of 645 clusters included in the 2016 EDHS, 23 of them had no latitude and longitude coordinates. The location data were accessed through the web page of the measure DHS Program after being authorized for utilization of the data (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Sampling procedure of the study.

Fig 2

Variables of the study

The outcome variable used for this study was under- nutrition which includes wasting, stunting, and underweight. Independent variables of the study include mothers’ age, mothers’ educational level, fathers’ educational level, marital status, sex of children, type of toilet facility, drinking water source, distance from the health facility, residence, wealth index, and family size. Categorization of variables like education level of respondents, educational level of fathers, and family size were based on different literatures [3134].

Operational definition

Under-nutrition

Defined as the type of malnutrition which includes stunting, wasting, and underweight among under-five children [1].

Underweight

Defined as children who have <-2 SDs below the mean weight for age of the National Center for Health Statistics and the World Health Organization (WHO) reference population [1].

Stunting

Defined as children who have low height/length for age Z score <-2 SDs of the median value of the WHO Child Growth Standards median aged 6–59 months [1,35].

Wasting

Defined as the children who have low height/length-for-age-Z score <-2 SDs of the median value of the WHO Child Growth Standards median aged 6–59 months [1,35].

Improved toilet facility

A toilet facility includes any non-shared toilet of those types: flush/pour flush toilets to piped water systems, septic tanks and, and pit latrines; ventilated improved pit (VIP) latrines, pit latrines with slabs, and composting toilets [36].

Unimproved toilet

A type of toilet facility that includes a bucket or a toilet that flush’s to elsewhere (in or nearby the household environment), pit latrine without slab/open pit, no facility/bush/field, bucket toilet, hanging toilet/latrine, no facilities [36].

Improved source of drinking water

Drinking water includes water piped into the residence, from piped water, a public tap, standpipes, tube wells, water from a borehole, a protected wells and spring, rainwater, and bottled water [36].

Unimproved source of drinking water

Drinking water from unprotected wells or springs, water from a vendor or tanker-truck and surface water (including rivers, dams, lakes, ponds, streams, canals, and irrigation channels [36].

Anthropometric measurements of weight and height

These measurements during the EDHS 2016 were taken with standardized and calibrated measuring tools after oral consent was obtained from their mothers. Accordingly, weight and height measurement of children was carried out from the selected enumeration areas. During data collection children less than 24 months were measured for height lying down and children greater than 24 months were measured while standing using a short measuring board. Weight measurements were taken with lightweight SECA mother infant scales with a digital screen designed and measured under the guidance of UNICEF. Details on anthropometric measurement were found on the EDHS report [7].

Data management and analysis

After accessing the data from the MEASURE DHS website data extraction, data weighting, data cleaning, recoding, Descriptive and summary statistics were held using STATA version 14.1 software.

Spatial analysis

The spatial autocorrelation (Global Moran’s I) statistic was held in order to assess the pattern of wasting, stunting, and underweight whether it was dispersed, clustered, or randomly distributed in the study area. Details about spatial autocorrelation is published everywhere [37,38]. Local Moran’s I measure positively correlated (high-high and low-low) clusters and outliers. The statistically determination of cluster outlier is published everywhere [39,40].

Gettis-ord Gi* statistics had been calculated to measure how spatial autocorrelation differs through the study location by computed Gi* statistics for each area. Z-score was calculated to ensure the statistical significance of clustering and the p-value calculated the significance p-value<0.05 at 95% CI if the Z-score is between -1.96 and +1.96, the p-value must be greater than 0.05 and vice versa. If the p-value is less than -1.96 it is declared as a cold spot and if greater than +1.96 it is declared as hotspot areas [41,42].

Spatial scan statistical analysis

It tests the presence of statistically significant spatial clusters of wasting, stunting, and under-weight among under-five children using Kuldorff’s SaTScan version 9.6 software. Children who had been wasted, stunted, and underweight were considered as cases and children who had normal nutritional status as controls to fit the Bernoulli model [43,44].

Spatial cluster size < 25% of the population was used, as a higher boundary, which allowed both small and large clusters detection. The primary and secondary clusters were identified and assigned p-values and ranked based on their log likelihood ratio test [4345].

Spatial regression analysis

Spatial regression has both local and global analysis techniques [4648]. Therefore, first, we had handled global geographical regression models and then local geographical analysis in order to ensure the variability of coefficients across each enumeration areas [4951]. Then we have checked the assumptions using exploratory regression with the respective tests. The normality assumption was checked for residuals using Jarque-Bera test. As residuals are not spatially auto-correlated, confirming the koenker Bp test was done to check if the model under gone for geographically weighted regression or not. Geographically weighted regression was executed using GWR version 4.0 software. We had also checked the six checks which recommended for a model undergone for spatial regression [52,53]. These are coefficients have the expected sign, no redundancy among model explanatory variables, coefficients are statically significant, strong adjusted R2 values and the above two conditions stated before. Variables that have a p-value less than 0.05 are selected and described based on their coefficients.

Ethical consideration

Permission to use the dataset has been granted by the Measure DHS program through legal registration. EDHS (2016) data was used which is available on the public domain through the Measure DHS website (www.measuredhs.com). Accordingly, the investigators had requested permission to use the data set on the Measure DHS website about the geographical variation of wasting, stunting, and underweight among under-five children in Ethiopia in May, 2020.

Results

Socio- demographic and other characteristics of respondents

A total of 10,640 under-five children were included in the 2016 EDHS survey. Of these, 1872 under-five children were dropped since valid or complete data were not obtained during data collection. Thus, after weighting the data a total of 9384 under-5 children were included in the analysis. The median age of children were 28 months with IQR = 31. In addition, the mean height of mothers was 158 centimeters (cm) with SD = 6.7. About 6183 (65.9%) of mothers had no formal education and 8363 (89.1%) were rural residents. About, 8471(89.9%), of respondents had used improved drinking water and about, 5278(56.25%) of respondents had used unimproved toilet facility (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants in Ethiopia (N = 9384).

Variables Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
Age the child (in months)
    <6 1013 10.9
    6–11 1013 10.9
    12–23 1853 19.75
    24–35 1766 18.82
    36–47 1814 19.33
    48–59 1925 20.51
Sex of the child
    Male 4801 51.2
    Female 4583 48.8
Age of the mother (in years)
    15–24 308 3.3
    25–34 6778 72.2
    35–49 2298 24.5
Mother’s educational level
    No education 6183 65.9
    Primary education 2562 27.3
    Secondary education/above 639 6.8
Mother’s employment status
    Employed 4101 43.7
    Not employed 5283 56.3
Residence
    Urban 1021 10.9
    Rural 8363 89.1
Region
    Tigray 642 6.84
    Afar 90 0.95
    Amhara 1807 19.26
    Oromo 4137 44.1
    Somali 393 4.2
    Benishangul-Gumuz 100 1.1
    SNNPR 1934 20.6
    Gambela 22 0.23
    Harari 19 0.21
    Dire Dawa 36 0.38
    Addis Ababa 205 2.2
Family size
    2–4 2416 25.74
    5–7 4679 49.86
    ≥8 2289 24.4
Wealth status
    Poorest 2176 23.2
    Poorer 2208 23.53
    Middle 1980 21
    Richer 1692 18
    Richest 1328 14.2
Source of drinking water
    Improved 5278 56.25
    Unimproved 4106 43.75
Type of toilet facility
    Improved 913 10.1
    Unimproved 8471 89.9
Father’s educational level
    No education 4291 48.14
    Primary 3570 40.05
    Secondary/above 1053 11.81
Father’s employment status
    Employed 8296 88.4
    Not employed 1088 11.6
Distance to health facility
    Big problem 5691 60.65
    Not big problem 3693 39.35

Nutritional status

The prevalence of stunting, wasting and under-weight among under-five children in Ethiopia was 3598 (38.30%) (95% CI: 37.34–39.30), 949(10.10%) (95% CI: 9.51–10.73) and 2192 (23.54%) (95%CI: 22.70–24.40), respectively. The study showed variation of under- nutrition across regions of Ethiopia. Consecutively, stunting was lowest in Addis Ababa (15%) and highest in Amhara region (46%), wasting is lowest in Addis Ababa (3.4%) and highest in Somali region (20.9%) (46%), and under-weight is lowest in Addis (4.4) and highest in Afar (37.8) (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Regional variation of under-nutrition among under-five children in Ethiopia.

Fig 3

Spatial variation of under-nutrition in Ethiopia

The spatial distribution of under-nutrition (wasting, stunting, and under-weight) was clustered at zonal level. Hence, the global Morans I index value was 0.363 (p-value < 0.001), 1.072 (p-value <0.001) and 0.879 (p-value <0.001) for wasting, stunting, and under-weight respectively as shown below in Table 2 and Fig 4.

Table 2. Summary of spatial autocorrelation of incomplete immunization in Ethiopia, EDHS 2016.

Variable Observed moran‘s I Expected moran’s I Z_score p_value
Wasting 0.362912 -0.011494 4.157 <0.001
Stunting 1.07198 -0.01802 12.014 <0.001
Underweight 0.87962 -0.01495 9.889 <0.001

Fig 4. Spatial autocorrelation of under-nutrition among under-five children in Ethiopia.

Fig 4

The highest case distribution of stunting was spatially clustered in the Amhara region (North Gondar, South Gondar, Waghmira, and East Gojam zones), Afar region (Zone 1), and Oromia region (Guji, Borena, and West Arsi zones). Zone 4 of Afar region, Afder, Liben, Shinale, Degahbur, and Warder Zones of Somali region, Neuer zone of Gambella region was highest in wasting children case distribution. The highest case distribution of under-weight was spatially clustered in the Amhara region (Waghmira and North Wollo zones), Afar region (Zone 2 and Zone 3), and Somali region (Liben zone) (Fig 5).

Fig 5. Spatial variation of under-nutrition among under-five children in Ethiopia.

Fig 5

Spatial distribution of stunting, wasting and underweight in Ethiopia from Ethiopian demographic and health survey 2016. The right panel represents for stunting, the left panel represents for wasting the right bottom panel represents for underweight. In the figure the damp gray color indicates very high clustering, the bright gray color indicates high clustering of wasting, stunting, and underweight cases, the damp yellow color indicates moderate clustering, the bright yellow color indicates low clustering, the whitish yellow color indicates very low clustering of wasting, stunting, and underweight cases. The thick black line indicates reginal borders while the thin white black line indicates zonal borders. Shape file source: (CSA, 2013; https://africaopendata.org/dataset/ethiopia-shapefiles); Own Map output: using ArcGIS 10.7 Software analysis.

Cluster and outlier zone detection for under-nutrition

Local Moran’s I analysis result of wasting, stunting, and underweight revealed that there were significant outliers. Accordingly, high outliers for underweight were detected in Shinale and Liben zones of the Somali region, Zone 3 of Afar region. Similarly, Shinale and Liben zones of the Somali region, Zone 3 of the Afar region, Guji, and West Shewa of the Oromia regions were detected as high outliers for wasting (Fig 6).

Fig 6. Cluster and outlier analysis of childhood under-nutrition in Ethiopia.

Fig 6

Local Moran’s I analysis result of stunting, wasting, and underweight in Ethiopia from Ethiopian demographic and health survey 2016. The right panel represents for stunting, the left panel represents for wasting, and the right bottom panel represents for underweight. In the figure the damp red color indicates high outlier, the blue color indicates low outlier clustering, the waterish blue color indicates low clustering the fogy color indicates insignificant clustering. The thick black line indicates reginal borders while the thin white black line indicates zonal borders. Shape file source: (CSA, 2013; https://africaopendata.org/dataset/ethiopia-shapefiles); Own Map output: using ArcGIS 10.7 Software analysis.

Hot spot and cold spot zones for under-nutrition in Ethiopia

We conducted a hot spot analysis using Gettis-Ord Gi* statistics. GIZ-score is computed to determine the statistical significance of clustering, and the p-value is computed for the significance. When the Z-score increases (+/−), its significance level increases. Statistical output with high Gi* indicates “hotspot” whereas low Gi* means a “cold spot”. As shown in Fig 7, dark red colors show significant (p-value < 0.001) clusters of Under-nutrition (risk areas), whereas, dark blue colors show significant (p-value < 0.001) non-risk areas. The more clustered red and blue colors indicate more Under-nutrition risk and non-risk areas, respectively.

Fig 7. Hotspot and cold spot zones of childhood under-nutrition in Ethiopia.

Fig 7

Gettis-Ord Gi* local Hotspot analysis result of stunting, wasting and underweight in Ethiopia from Ethiopian demographic and health survey 2016. The right panel represents for stunting, the left panel represents for wasting, and the right bottom panel represents for underweight. In the figure the red color indicates high hotspot zones, the blue color indicates cold spot zones, the whitish yellow color indicates insignificant clustering of wasting, stunting, and underweight. The thick black line indicates reginal borders, while the thin white black line indicates zonal borders. Shape file source: (CSA, 2013; https://africaopendata.org/dataset/ethiopia-shapefiles); Own Map output: using ArcGIS 10.7 Software analysis.

Hotspot analysis enables the detection of both extremities either high or low wasting, stunting, and underweight coverage zones.

Accordingly, hot spot (high risk) regions for stunting were detected in the Amhara region (West Gojam, Awi, South Gondar, and Waghmira zones). Somali region (Afder, Gode, Korahe, Warder Zones), Afar region (Zone 2), Tigray region (Southern zone), and Amhara region (Waghmira zones) was detected as hot spot zones for wasting.

Amhara region (South Wollo, North Wollo, Awi, South Gondar, and Waghmira zones), Afar region (Zone 2), Tigray region (Eastern zone, North Western zone, Central zone, Southern zone, and Mekele special Zones), and Benshangul region (Metekel and Assosa Zones) were hot spot zones for underweight.

On the other hand, North Shoa Zones of the Amhara region, Zone 3 of Afar region, Arsi and East Hararge of Oromia region, Shinale and Jijiga zones of the Somali region Dire Dawa city administration, Harari city administration cold spot zones for stunting.

Arsi, East Shoa, and South West Shewa Zones of the Oromia region, zone 3 Zone of Afar region, Gurage and Silte Zones of SNNPR for wasting were considered as cold spot zones.

Amhara region (North Shoa Zone), Afar region (Zone 3), Oromya region (Arsi, Horo Gudo Wellega, North Shoa, East Shoa, West Shoa, and South West Shoa Zones), SNNPR (Gurage and Silte Zones), and Addis Ababa city administration were detected as cold spot areas for childhood underweight (Fig 7).

Spatial clustering of under- nutrition in Ethiopia

Spatial scan statistics identified primary and secondary clusters of wasting, stunting, and underweight using the maximum spatial circular windows ≤ 25% of the total population. Accordingly, spatial scan statistics identified (one primary and one secondary cluster) for stunting, (one primary and three secondary clusters) for wasting, and (one primary and three secondary clusters) for under-weight.

The primary cluster for stunting (LLR = 466.3, P<0.001) was centered at (14.033876N, 37.105923 E) with 578.81 km radius and a relative risk (RR) of 1.44. It incorporates all zones of Amhara, Tigray, Afar, and Benishangul regions. Kelem Wollega, Horo Gudu Wollega, West Shoa, South West Shoa, and North Shoa Zones of the Oromia region were also primary clusters for stunting.

The primary cluster for wasting (LLR = 215.9, P<0.001) was centered at (7.650693 N, 47.007919 E) with 819.42 km radius and a relative risk (RR) of 1.8. It surrounds all zones of Somali region, (Bale, East Harerege, West Harerege, and Arsi) Zones of Oromia region, and (Zone 1, Zone 3, and Zone 5) of Afar region.

The primary cluster for under-weight (LLR = 402.9, P<0.001) was centered at 14.033876N, 37.105923 E about 578.81 km radius with relative risk (RR) of 1.57. It surrounds all zones of Amhara, Tigray, and Afar regions. In addition, Kelem Wollega, Horo Gudu Wollega, West Shoa, South West Shoa and North Shoa Zones of the Oromia region also contains primary clusters for underweight (Fig 8 and Table 3).

Fig 8. Spatial clustering of under-nutrition among under-five children in Ethiopia at zonal level.

Fig 8

Spatial scan statics analysis result of wasting, stunting, under-weight in Ethiopia from Ethiopian demographic and health survey. The right panel represents for wasting EDHS, and the left panel represents for stunting EDHS the right bottom panel represents for under EDHS In the figure the red color rings indicates primary spatial window, the rose, black, and green colored ring indicates secondary spatial windows. The foggy line indicates zonal borders while the thick black line indicates regional borders. Shape file source: (CSA, 2013; https://africaopendata.org/dataset/ethiopia-shapefiles); Own Map output: using ArcGIS 10.7 Software analysis.

Table 3. Significant cluster of under-nutrition in Ethiopia at zonal level.

Variable Detected clusters Coordinate/radius Population Cases RR LLR
Underweight Primary cluster** (14.033876 N, 37.105923 E)/578.81 km 23800 6908 1.57 402.9
Secondary cluster** (4.006703 N, 41.599743 E)/276.07 km 800 284 1.54 30.9
Secondary cluster** (7.701180 N, 37.486553 E)/0 km 100 50 2.15 16.8
Secondary cluster** (8.757437 N, 40.299442E)/88.72 km 1205 361 1.3 14.6
Stunting Primary cluster** (14.033876 N, 37.105923 E)/578.81 km 23800 9948 1.44 466.3
Secondary cluster** (5.977586 N, 38.145000 E)/214.49 km 7000 2890 1.22 73.7
Wasting Primary cluster** (7.650693 N, 47.007919 E)/819.42 km 9404 1666 1.8 215.9
Secondary cluster** (8.229235 N, 33.886337 E)/107.40 km 3700 625 1.56 56.8
Secondary cluster** (12.161379 N, 39.633205 E)/79.10 km 2600 429 1.5 34
Secondary cluster** (14.157544 N, 38.143852 E)/47.55 km 900 162 1.6 18.2

Spatial regression analysis of the determinants of childhood under-nutrition

Ordinary least square

After checking spatial regression assumptions for stunting, wasting, and underweight using exploratory regression, an ordinary least square analysis was carried out. Outputs from the spatial regression analysis revealed that, residuals of spatial relationship are uncorrelated (Fig 9, Tables 46) and there was no multi-collinearity among explanatory variables (Tables 79).

Fig 9. Spatial autocorrelation of residuals for geographical weighted regression.

Fig 9

Table 4. Spatial regression summary result of ordinary least square (global GWR) diagnostics for stunting using 2016 EDHS data.
Diagnostics criteria Magnitude p-value
AICc 5488.44
R squared 0.28
Adjusted R squared 0.28
Joint f statistics 49.9 0.0000*
Joint wald statistics 258.48 0.0000*
Koenker (Bp) statistics 7.923847 0.0056*
Jareque-Bera statistics 41.17 0.1173
Table 6. Spatial regression summary result of ordinary least square (global GWR) diagnostics for under-weight using 2016 EDHS data.
Diagnostics criteria Magnitude p-value
AICc 5370.16
R squared 0.25
Adjusted R squared 0.24
Joint f statistics 35.42 0.0000*
Joint wald statistics 211.26 0.0000*
Koenker (Bp) statistics 15.13 0.0034*
Jareque-Bera statistics 124.27 0.1255
Table 7. Spatial regression summary result of ordinary least square (global GWR) coefficients for stunting using 2016 EDHS data.
Variables Coefficient Probability Robust Probability Vif
Intercept 20.394627 0.0000 0.0000
Unimproved toilet 0.186728 0.0000 0.0000 2.6
Female children 0.133730 0.000923 0.006641 1
Father has primary education -0.127514 0.002602 0.005114 1
Father has secondary education -0.206403 0.0000 0.0000 1.9
Rural residence -0.030603 0.229836 0.201706 3.1
Table 9. Spatial regression summary result of ordinary least square (global GWR) coefficients for under-weight in Ethiopia.
Variables Coefficient Probability Robust Probability Vif
Intercept 14.548280 0.0000 0.0000
Unimproved toilet 0.134182 0.000006 0.0000 2.6
Mothers aged 35–49 -0.158624 0.000881 0.000043 1.1
mother has primary education -0.094737 0.000726 0.003601 1.1
Father has secondary education -0.100582 0.000283 0.000314 1.9
Rural residence 0.031254 0.185344 0.147858 3.2
Distance is a big problem 0.026273 0.236677 0.253878 1.5
Table 5. Spatial regression summary result of ordinary least square (global GWR) diagnostics for wasting using 2016 EDHS data.
Diagnostics criteria Magnitude p-value
AICc 5020.45
R squared 0.25
Adjusted R squared 0.26
Joint f statistics 10.08 0.0000*
Joint wald statistics 76.42 0.0000*
Koenker (Bp) statistics 7.46 0.0356*
Jareque-Bera statistics 102.5 0.1003

To handle geographical weighted regression, the koenker Bp test in the ordinary least square analysis could be significant, which reveals the difference of coefficients across enumeration areas. In this study, koenker Bp test was found significant hence executing geographically weighted regression is recommended. Accordingly, we have executed geographically weighted regression and determined the local coefficients of each independent variable.

Ordinary least square analysis for factors associated with under-nutrition

In ordinary least square analysis households used unimproved toilet facility, father completed primary and secondary education and has female children were factors significantly associated with stunting. Respondents who had used unimproved toilet facility and being a female child increases stunting by 0.186728 and 0.133730 times.

A unit increase for father’s primary and secondary education stunting decreases by 0.127514 and 0.206403 times respectively (Table 7).

A unit increase for respondent’s l who had used unimproved toilet and having children 8 and above increases wasting by 0.059517 and 0.085499 times. In contrast, a unit increase for father had primary education and mothers aged 35–49 years decreases wasting by 0.071297 and 0.115005 times (Table 8).

Table 8. Spatial regression summary result of ordinary least square (global GWR) coefficients for wasting using 2016 EDHS data.
Variables Coefficient Probability Robust Probability Vif
Intercept 5.377181 0.0000 0.000286
Unimproved toilet 0.059517 0.006054 0.013870 2.6
Having 8 family size & above 0.085499 0.000920 0.003609 1.1
Father with primary education -0.071297 0.013270 0.000012 1
Mother aged 35–49 -0.115005 0.001641 0.000730 1.1
Rural residence 0.005595 0.325846 0.325412 2.6

Similarly, in ordinary least square analysis unimproved toilet, mother had primary education, father has secondary education, and mothers aged 35–49 years was significant predictors of under-weight. Accordingly, a unit increase for respondent’s households who had used unimproved toilet increases underweight by 0.134182 times. In contrast, a unit increase for mother’s primary education, father’s secondary education, and mother’s aged 35–49 years decreases underweight by 0.094737, 0.100582 and 0.158624 times respectively (Table 9).

Geographically weighted regression of under-nutrition

The result of geographically weighted regression identified different variable coefficients for the identified variables on ordinary least square analysis. For stunting higher coefficients of unimproved toilet of households were detected in all parts of Amhara region, most parts of benshangul-gumz region, western parts of gambela region, western and eastern parts of SNNPR, and western oromia region.

Similarly, higher coefficients for father has primary education were detected in central Tigray region, North Eastern parts of SNNPR and Central Oromia region. higher coefficients for father have secondary education was detected in Central Tigray, Eastern parts of SNNPR, most parts of Gambela region and Western Oromia, and higher coefficients for mother’s primary education was detected in Central, Eastern and Southern Tigray region, Eastern Amhara region and Northern SNNPR (Fig 10).

Fig 10. GWR coefficient estimates for predictors of stunting.

Fig 10

Geographically weighted regression (GWR) analysis result of explanatory variables (unimproved toilet, father has primary education, father has secondary education and female children) with stunting in Ethiopia from Ethiopian demographic and health survey 2016. Each point in the map represents one enumeration area which has a lot of stunting cases. The right panel represents for unimproved toilet, the left panel represents for father has primary education, the right bottom panel represents for father has secondary education and the right bottom panel represents for female children. In the figure the bright red color indicates high magnitude of coefficient estimates, the grean color indicates low magnitude of coefficient estimates, the rose color indicates medium magnitude of coefficient estimates. The thick black line indicates reginal borders while the thin white black line indicates zonal borders. Shape file source: (CSA, 2013; https://africaopendata.org/dataset/ethiopia-shapefiles); Own Map output: using ArcGIS 10.7 Software analysis.

For wasting higher coefficients of unimproved toilet of households were detected in eastern Tigray, Eastern Amhara, Eastern parts of SNNPR region and Western parts of Gambella region. Consistently, higher coefficients for father has primary educational level were detected in most parts of Tigray region, Eastern parts of SNNPR region, Harari region and Diredawa city administrative, higher coefficients for mothers aged 35–49 years old were detected in most parts of Tigray region, Eastern parts of Somali region, Harari region and Dire-dawa city administrative (Fig 11).

Fig 11. GWR coefficient estimates for predictors of wasting.

Fig 11

Geographically weighted regression (GWR) analysis result of explanatory variables (unimproved toilet, father has primary education, having children 8 and above and mothers aged 35–49) with wasting in Ethiopia. Each point in the map represents one enumeration area which has a lots of under-weight cases. The right panel represents for unimproved toilet, the left panel represents for father has primary education, the right bottom panel represents for having children 8 and above and the right bottom panel represents for mothers aged 35–49. In the figure the bright red color indicates high magnitude of coefficient estimates, the green color indicates low magnitude of coefficient estimates, the rose color indicates medium magnitude of coefficient estimates. The thick black line indicates reginal borders while the thin white black line indicates zonal borders. Shape file source: (CSA, 2013; https://africaopendata.org/dataset/ethiopia-shapefiles); Own Map output: using ArcGIS 10.7 Software analysis.

Similarly, for under-weight higher coefficients of unimproved toilet of households were detected in all regions of the country except Oromia region, higher coefficients for mother had primary education was detected in Tigray region, Gambela region, and Diredawa city administrative. higher coefficients for father have secondary education was detected in Eastern Tigray, central and Eastern Amhara region and Addis Ababa city administrative (Fig 12).

Fig 12. GWR coefficient estimates for predictors of underweight.

Fig 12

Geographically weighted regression (GWR) analysis result of explanatory variables (unimproved toilet, mothers has primary education, father has secondary education and mothers aged 35–49) with under-weight in Ethiopia. Each point in the map represents one enumeration area which has a lots of under-weight cases. The right panel represents for unimproved toilet, the left panel represents for mothers has primary education, the right bottom panel represents for father has secondary education and the right bottom panel represents for mothers aged 35–49.In the figure the bright red color indicates high magnitude of coefficient estimates, the grean color indicates low magnitude of coefficient estimates, the rose color indicates medium magnitude of coefficient estimates. The thick black line indicates reginal borders while the thin white black line indicates zonal borders. Shape file source: (CSA, 2013; https://africaopendata.org/dataset/ethiopia-shapefiles); Own Map output: using ArcGIS 10.7 Software analysis.

Discussion

Under-nutrition remains a significant problem in Ethiopia, even efforts have been exerted to reduce the problem. In this study the prevalence of under-nutrition (stunting, wasting and underweight) was 38.30%, 10.10% and 23.54%, respectively. The prevalence of under-nutrition (stunting, wasting and under-weight) was also varying across Ethiopian administrative regions. The burden of under-nutrition is still very high and not evenly distributed in the country. The reports of EDHS also ensure a very stagnant reduction of under-nutrition (stunting, wasting and underweight).

This finding for stunting was lower than studies conducted in Ethiopia [11], in Ghana [9], in Zambia [54], and in Cameroon [55]. But it was higher than studies conducted in Tanzania [56], in Kenya [54], in Ghana [57], and in Senegal [58]. This finding was also in line with studies conducted in different parts of Ethiopia previously [27]. This finding for wasting is lower when compared with studies conducted in Ethiopia [59], in Senegal [58], and Cameroon [55]. But it is in line with studies conducted in Ghana [60], Haromaya Ethiopia [11] and higher than studies conducted in Tanzania [56], Northern Ghana [57], rural Ethiopia [10].

Finding from this study for under-weight is also lower when compared with studies conducted in Ethiopia [61], and Cameroon [55]. But the finding was higher than studies conducted in Ethiopia [62], Tanzania [56], and Northern Ghana [57]. The find was consistent with studies conducted in Ethiopia [11].

The discrepancy might be due to; those pocket studies in Ethiopia might not use adequate representative sample size [63,64]. In addition, it could be due to health system structure and the health policy of Ethiopia, in which different studies conducted in Ethiopia revealed that, the distribution of health care facility and health care professionals across the country is not evenly distributed [65,66].

The finding showed that under-nutrition indicators was clustered spatially at the zonal level. Getis-Ord spatial analysis detected hot spot, cold spot and outliers’ zones in Ethiopia. Furthermore, the detection of hot spot zones using Getis-Ord analysis was assessed using sat scan analysis and reports confirmatory findings for the analysis.

In this study the spatial distribution of stunting was clustered at the zonal level. Different studies also support the presence of geographical variation for stunting. A study conducted on geographical variation of stunting found a significant clustering of stunting across Ethiopia zones [28]. The study conducted in India demonstrates a significantly higher value of Moran I (0.65) that suggests a high level of spatial clustering of childhood stunting in zones. Thus, a total of 159 hot spots zones mostly from the central and eastern parts of India [67].

In this study the spatial distribution of wasting was clustered. Different studies also revealed the presence of geographical variation for wasting. A study conducted in Ethiopia reported that significant clustering of stunting across Ethiopian zones. Thus, Liben, Afder and Shinile administrative zones from Somali Regional State and Zone 1, Zone 3 and Zone 4 administrative zones from Afar Regional State, Borena, East and West Harargie from Oromiya Regional State were identified as hot spot zones for wasting [29]. A study conducted previously reported that significant clustering of wasting across regions. Thus, Afar and Somali regions were identified as hot spot areas for wasting [27]. A study conducted on spatial clustering of stunting and wasting in Meskane Mareko District in Gurage Zone found significant clustering of wasting in Diram and Bati Lejano kebeles of the district [68].

The current study revealed the spatial distribution of underweight was clustered at Zonal level of Ethiopia. Different studies also revealed the presence of geographical variation for underweight [68]. All administrative zones of Amhara region, Tigray, Afar, Ben. Gumz regional state administrative zones and East Wellega and East Shewa, North Showa administrative zones, from Oromiya Regional State, Liben, Afder, Borena and Gode administrative of Somali regional state were identified as hotspot zones for underweight [29]. A study conducted previously found a significant clustering of underweight across Ethiopia regions. Since Afar and Somali regions were identified as hot spot areas for underweight [27]. A study conducted in India also identified clusters of underweight, 146 districts (23% of all the districts) were observed as of high underweight [67].

The most convenient explanation for this spatial variation of under-nutrition could be as a result of geographical variation in the country which ranges from 4550 meters above sea level to 110 meters below sea level. Consequently, infrastructure differences like: road, electricity, water, the distribution of health facilities, and health care professionals across regions. In addition, there is a difference in culture, socio-demographic characteristics of mothers and fathers, attitude and knowledge difference of the society towards under-nutrition across different regions. Overall this form of difference in Ethiopia could came up with inequalities of under-nutrition indicators across different parts of the country [66,69,70]. This implies that, geographic-based nutritional interventions, mainly mobilizing additional resources could be held to reduce the burden childhood under-nutrition in hot spot areas. In addition, governmental and non-governmental organization working in the identified hot spot areas could be routinely monitored and evaluated nutritional programs in order to improve nutritional status of the children with a special emphasis.

In spatial regression analysis, different statistically significant predictor variables of all forms of under-nutrition were identified. had unimproved toilet, father had primary education; father had a secondary education and has female children were significant predictors for stunting. Similarly, respondents had unimproved toilet, father has primary education, having children 8 and above and mothers aged 35–49 years were significant predictors for wasting.

Further respondents had unimproved toilet facility, mother has primary education, father has secondary education and mothers aged 35–49 years was identified as significant predictors for underweight.

Different studies conducted in Ethiopia and abroad also revealed the existence of considerable significant difference of under-nutrition predictors across a geographical area [2426,7173]. The education level of mothers’ and the fathers was negatively correlated with under-nutrition indicators (stunting, wasting and underweight) and its coefficients significantly varied across regions of Ethiopia. This might be due to the reason that there is considerable infrastructure difference among regions which in turn inhibits the educational status of the society. Education is a key tool to acknowledge nutritional status of children and to solve problems associated with under-nutrition.

Those who are educated are in a better advance than who are not educated in most occasion. Thus, when education level increase under-nutrition could be decreased. This implies that, Education of parents could be encouraged using different strategies like organizing mothers at village level and assigning community educators, since most of the mothers are aged enough and are not eligible to have formal education. In addition, young mothers could be encouraged to be involved in formal education. Furthermore, the life style of the community could be improved.

In the context of unimproved toilets; on most occasion those households having unimproved toilets could be linked with the poor wealth status of the household and lower education level of the respondents this in turn could be influence the nutritional status of the children. This is because of the reasons that unimproved toilet could increase under-nutrition of the children. This implies that, the government should focus on the construction of independent toilet for each household. Hygiene, sanitation and utilization of household toilets could be improved by frequent education using different agents other than health extension workers. In addition, Hygiene and sanitation as a course could be incorporated in formal education of Ethiopia.

In the context of households have 8 and above members; mothers who have children in the past enable to understand the possible components of adequate nutrition of a child through frequent exposure and experience. In addition, when household had a greater number of members, they could assist in the preparation of foods for their mothers that enable the mother to afford varieties of food for their children easily. This implies that, having greater number of family members could bring the opportunity of caring a child and improve the nutritional status of a child. In the context of mothers aged 35–49 years old; when the age of the mother increases, she could have experiences in caring a child in different occasions. Thus, mothers getting older could acknowledge the nutritional status of their children easily. Since they are well experienced in doing so. This implies that, experience has paramount importance in appreciating and solving a certain problem.

For stunting the analysis of hot spot and geographically weighted regression fit with higher coefficients of unimproved toilet of household’s areas identified by GWR. In those areas which has higher coefficients for unimproved toilet of household’s also has hot spots of stunting, in those areas which has higher negative coefficients for father has primary and secondary education also has hot spot of stunting.

For wasting the analysis of hot spot and geographically weighted regression fits with higher coefficients of unimproved toilet of household’s areas identified by GWR. In those areas which has higher coefficients for unimproved toilet of household’s also has hot spots of stunting, in those areas which has higher negative coefficients for fathers has primary education also has hot spot of wasting. Similarly, in areas which have higher negative coefficients for mothers aged 35–49 years old has also hot spot zones for wasting.

For underweight, the analysis of hot spot and geographically weighted regression fit with higher coefficients of unimproved toilet of household’s areas identified by GWR. In those areas which has higher coefficients for unimproved toilet of household’s also has hot spots of under-weight, in those areas which has higher negative coefficients for fathers and mother has primary education also has hot spot of under-weight.

Over all the analysis of hot spot areas using Getis-Ord spatial auto correlation cluster and outlier and spatial scan statistics fits with the analysis of spatial regression in somewhere and vary also somewhere. This study supports the existing knowledge on the influence of infrastructure coverage, and geographic features on under-nutrition across the country. This study contributes to identify specific hot spot zones throughout the country and factors significantly affect under-nutrition, which is very important for intervention. Even though there is documented influence of factors like infrastructure coverage and geographic features it is difficult to understand specific hot spot zones for under-nutrition in which this study could brought a solution. The findings of the present study are crucial for zonal level planning for child health. Regional pattern and clustering of indicators used in the study suggest a need to strengthen and continue zonal focused programs.

Strength and limitation of the study

The study findings can be generalized to all under-five children in Ethiopia. Moreover, the use of Geographic Information System (GIS) and Sat Scan statistical tests helped to detect similar and statistically significant high-risk clusters/hotspots of under-nutrition. Additionally, use of geographic weighted regression analysis helps to show the real impact of predictors at each specific geographic area. Furthermore, this study had used geographically weighted regression analysis that could enables to determine local coefficients a step advance from ordinary least square analysis. In addition, geographically weighted regression analysis improves model performance by employing a spatial weighted function and addresses spatial heterogeneity and also has an advantage of having less biased predicted coefficients compared to spatial lag and spatial error models. Even though spatial lag and spatial error models enable to addresses both spatial heterogeneity and spatial homogeneity, spatial heterogeneity and spatial homogeneity are unique, not mutually exclusive, features of spatial data. Therefore, this model might bring biased coefficients.

As to limitation, location data values were shifted 1-2km for urban and 5km for rural areas for data confidentiality reasons since it didn’t show exact case locations. The data used for analysis were not taking into account seasonal variations of under-nutrition. In addition, the study did not do an adjustment for covariates during estimation of the spatial epidemiology of child malnutrition. The missed data may also affect the true estimates of the analysis. Furthermore, there may be false inclusion and exclusion of SaT Scan clusters.

Conclusion

Our study showed that the distribution of under nutrition among under-five children was clustered at zonal level in Ethiopia. It had a geographical variation across regions of Ethiopia. Hot spot zones for stunting were detected in West Gojam, Awi, South Gondar, and Waghmira zones). Similarly, Somali region (Afder, Gode, Korahe, Warder Zones), Afar region (Zone 2), Tigray region (Southern zone), and Amhara region (Waghmira zones) was detected as hot spot zones for wasting. Furthermore, hot spot zones for under-weight was detected in Amhara region (South Wollo, North Wollo, Awi, South Gondar, and Waghmira zones), Afar region (Zone 2), Tigray region (Eastern zone, North Western zone, Central zone, Southern zone, and Mekele special Zones), and Benshangul region (Metekel and Assosa Zones).

In spatial regression analysis, different statistically significant predictor variables of all forms of under-nutrition were identified. Had unimproved toilet, father with primary and secondary education, and has female children were significant predictors of stunting. Consistently, has unimproved toilet, father has primary education, having children 8 and above, and mothers aged 35–49 years were also significant factors of wasting. In addition, has unimproved toilet, mother has primary education, father has secondary education, and mothers aged 35–49 years were significant predictors of underweight.

Thus, geographic based nutritional interventions mainly mobilizing additional resources could be held to reduce the burden childhood under-nutrition in hot spot areas. In addition, improving sanitation and hygiene practice, improving the life style of the community, and promotion of parent education in the identified hot spot zones for under-nutrition should be more emphasized.

Supporting information

S1 File. Conceptual frame work of the study.

(PDF)

S2 File. Variance inflation factor for stunting.

(PDF)

S3 File. Variance inflation factor for wasting.

(PDF)

S4 File. Variance inflation factor for underweight.

(PDF)

S5 File. Letter of approval to use DHS data.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the MEASURE DHS program that provides permission with data access authorization so as to enable us to conduct the study.

Abbreviations

DHS

Demographic and Health Survey

EDHS

Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey

HAZ

Height for Age Z-score

ICF

International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health

IQR

Inter Quartile Range

LLR

log-likelihood ratio

SD

Standard Deviation

UNICEF

United Nation International Children’s Fund

WAZ

Weight for age Z-score

WHO

World Health Organization

WHZ

Weight for Height Z-score

EFY

Ethiopian Fiscal Year

FMOH

Federal Ministry of Health

GWR

Geographic Weighted Regression

OLS

Ordinary Least Square

Data Availability

All relevant data are available from the Demographic Health Surveys Program (https://dhsprogram.com/).

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Newberry S.J., et al., List of Excluded Studies, in Sodium and Potassium Intake: Effects on Chronic Disease Outcomes and Risks [Internet]. 2018, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; (US: ). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Allen L.H. and Gillespie S.R., What works? A review of the efficacy and effectiveness of nutrition interventions. 2001: Asian Development Bank. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jones J.B. Jr, Wolf B., and Mills H.A., Plant analysis handbook. A practical sampling, preparation, analysis, and interpretation guide. 1991: Micro-Macro Publishing, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Organization, W.H., Working together for health: the World health report 2006: policy briefs. 2006: World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brown K.H. and Bégin F., Malnutrition among weanlings of developing countries: still a problem begging for solutions. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 1993. 17(2): p. 132–138. 10.1097/00005176-199308000-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Boulom S., et al., Factors associated with child malnutrition in mountainous ethnic minority communities in Lao PDR. Global Health Action, 2020. 13(sup2): p. 1785736. 10.1080/16549716.2020.1785736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.CSA and ICF-International, Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Calverton, Maryland, USA: Central Statistical Agency [Ethiopia] and ORC Macro. 2016.
  • 8.Turck D., et al., World health organization 2006 child growth standards and 2007 growth reference charts: a discussion paper by the committee on nutrition of the European society for pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2013. 57(2): p. 258–264. 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318298003f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wemakor A. and Iddrisu H., Maternal depression does not affect complementary feeding indicators or stunting status of young children (6–23 months) in Northern Ghana. BMC research notes, 2018. 11(1): p. 408. 10.1186/s13104-018-3528-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gashu D., et al., Stunting, selenium deficiency and anemia are associated with poor cognitive performance in preschool children from rural Ethiopia. Nutrition journal, 2015. 15(1): p. 38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yisak H., Gobena T., and Mesfin F., Prevalence and risk factors for under nutrition among children under five at Haramaya district, Eastern Ethiopia. BMC pediatrics, 2015. 15(1): p. 212. 10.1186/s12887-015-0535-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guimarães A.G.F., et al., Spatial analysis of visceral leishmaniasis in the municipality of Rondonópolis, in the Brazilian State of Mato Grosso, from 2003 to 2012: human, canine and vector distribution in areas of disease transmission. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 2015. 48(3): p. 291–300. 10.1590/0037-8682-0001-2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bhunia G.S., et al., Spatial and temporal variation and hotspot detection of kala-azar disease in Vaishali district (Bihar), India. BMC infectious diseases, 2013. 13(1): p. 64. 10.1186/1471-2334-13-64 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Menezes J.A., et al., An integrated approach using spatial analysis to study the risk factors for Leishmaniasis in area of recent transmission. BioMed research international, 2015. 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kikuti M., et al., Spatial distribution of dengue in a Brazilian urban slum setting: Role of socioeconomic gradient in disease risk. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2015. 9(7): p. e0003937. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yeshiwondim A.K., et al., Spatial analysis of malaria incidence at the village level in areas with unstable transmission in Ethiopia. International Journal of Health Geographics, 2009. 8(1): p. 5. 10.1186/1476-072X-8-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Peterson I., et al., A temporal-spatial analysis of malaria transmission in Adama, Ethiopia. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2009. 81(6): p. 944–949. 10.4269/ajtmh.2009.08-0662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Santos C.B., et al., Diarrhea incidence and intestinal infections among rotavirus vaccinated infants from a poor area in Brazil: a spatial analysis. BMC public health, 2014. 14(1): p. 399. 10.1186/1471-2458-14-399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Azage M., et al., Childhood diarrhea exhibits spatiotemporal variation in northwest Ethiopia: a SaTScan spatial statistical analysis. PLoS One, 2015. 10(12): p. e0144690. 10.1371/journal.pone.0144690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bogale G.G., et al., Spatial patterns of childhood diarrhea in Ethiopia: data from Ethiopian demographic and health surveys (2000, 2005, and 2011). BMC infectious diseases, 2017. 17(1): p. 426. 10.1186/s12879-017-2504-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ayele D.G., Zewotir T.T., and Mwambi H.G., Structured additive regression models with spatial correlation to estimate under-five mortality risk factors in Ethiopia. BMC public health, 2015. 15(1): p. 268. 10.1186/s12889-015-1602-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sisay M.M., et al., Spatial patterns and determinants of postnatal care use in Ethiopia: findings from the 2016 demographic and health survey. BMJ open, 2019. 9(6): p. e025066. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Boerma J.T., Levels of maternal mortality in developing countries. Studies in family planning, 1987. 18(4): p. 213–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.López-Carr D., et al., Climate-related child undernutrition in the Lake Victoria basin: An integrated spatial analysis of health surveys, ndvi, and precipitation data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2016. 9(6): p. 2830–2835. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kandala N.B., et al., Semiparametric analysis of the socio-demographic and spatial determinants of undernutrition in two african countries. 2001. 10.1074/jbc.M103585200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kandala N.B., et al., Geo‐additive models of childhood undernutrition in three sub‐Saharan African countries. Population, Space and Place, 2009. 15(5): p. 461–473. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lemessa R., Tafese A., and Aga G., Spatial Distribution and Modeling of malnutrition among under-five Children in Ethiopia. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Haile D., et al., Exploring spatial variations and factors associated with childhood stunting in Ethiopia: spatial and multilevel analysis. BMC pediatrics, 2016. 16(1): p. 49. 10.1186/s12887-016-0587-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Alemu Z.A., et al., Non random distribution of child undernutrition in Ethiopia: spatial analysis from the 2011 Ethiopia demographic and health survey. International journal for equity in health, 2016. 15(1): p. 1–10. 10.1186/s12939-016-0480-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Commission P.C., Summary and statistical report of the 2007 population and housing census. Population size by age and sex. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Akombi B.J., et al., Stunting and severe stunting among children under-5 years in Nigeria: A multilevel analysis. BMC pediatrics, 2017. 17(1): p. 15. 10.1186/s12887-016-0770-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chirande L., et al., Determinants of stunting and severe stunting among under-fives in Tanzania: evidence from the 2010 cross-sectional household survey. BMC pediatrics, 2015. 15(1): p. 165. 10.1186/s12887-015-0482-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tiwari R., Ausman L.M., and Agho K.E., Determinants of stunting and severe stunting among under-fives: evidence from the 2011 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey. BMC pediatrics, 2014. 14(1): p. 239. 10.1186/1471-2431-14-239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bitew B.D., et al., The effect of SODIS water treatment intervention at the household level in reducing diarrheal incidence among children under 5 years of age: a cluster randomized controlled trial in Dabat district, northwest Ethiopia. Trials, 2018. 19(1): p. 412. 10.1186/s13063-018-2797-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.De Onis M., et al., Comparison of the World Health Organization (WHO) Child Growth Standards and the National Center for Health Statistics/WHO international growth reference: implications for child health programmes. Public health nutrition, 2006. 9(7): p. 942–947. 10.1017/phn20062005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Supply W.U.J.W., Programme S.M., and Organization W.H., Progress on sanitation and drinking water: 2015 update and MDG assessment. 2015: World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kumari S. and Jain M.K., A critical review on air quality index, in Environmental Pollution. 2018, Springer. p. 87–102. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Santiago I., Fundamentos de ArcGIS versión 10.2–Tutorial de ejercicios. Puerto Rico, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Anselin L., Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical analysis, 1995. 27(2): p. 93–115. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cressie N. and Collins L.B., Patterns in spatial point locations: Local indicators of spatial association in a minefield with clutter. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 2001. 48(5): p. 333–347. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wulder M. and Boots B., Local spatial autocorrelation characteristics of remotely sensed imagery assessed with the Getis statistic. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1998. 19(11): p. 2223–2231. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.De Valck J., et al., Contrasting collective preferences for outdoor recreation and substitutability of nature areas using hot spot mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2016. 151: p. 64–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Huang L., Kulldorff M., and Gregorio D., A spatial scan statistic for survival data. Biometrics, 2007. 63(1): p. 109–118. 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00661.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Coleman M., et al., Using the SaTScan method to detect local malaria clusters for guiding malaria control programmes. Malaria journal, 2009. 8(1): p. 68. 10.1186/1475-2875-8-68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kulldorff M., A spatial scan statistic. Communications in Statistics-Theory and methods, 1997. 26(6): p. 1481–1496. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wheeler D. and Tiefelsdorf M., Multicollinearity and correlation among local regression coefficients in geographically weighted regression. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2005. 7(2): p. 161–187. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fotheringham A.S., Brunsdon C., and Charlton M., Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. 2003: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Brunsdon C., Fotheringham S., and Charlton M., Geographically weighted regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1998. 47(3): p. 431–443. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Leung Y., Mei C.-L., and Zhang W.-X., Statistical tests for spatial nonstationarity based on the geographically weighted regression model. Environment and Planning A, 2000. 32(1): p. 9–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.LeSage J.P., A family of geographically weighted regression models, in Advances in spatial econometrics. 2004, Springer. p. 241–264. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mennis J., Mapping the results of geographically weighted regression. The Cartographic Journal, 2006. 43(2): p. 171–179. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fotheringham A.S., Charlton M.E., and Brunsdon C., Geographically weighted regression: a natural evolution of the expansion method for spatial data analysis. Environment and planning A, 1998. 30(11): p. 1905–1927. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Charlton M., Fotheringham S., and Brunsdon C., Geographically weighted regression. White paper. National Centre for Geocomputation. National University of Ireland Maynooth, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hoffman D., et al., Temporal changes and determinants of childhood nutritional status in Kenya and Zambia. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 2017. 36(1): p. 27. 10.1186/s41043-017-0095-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sakwe N., et al., Relationship between malaria, anaemia, nutritional and socio-economic status amongst under-ten children, in the North Region of Cameroon: A cross-sectional assessment. Plos one, 2019. 14(6): p. e0218442. 10.1371/journal.pone.0218442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mshida H.A., et al., Water, sanitation, and hygiene practices associated with nutritional status of under-five children in semi-pastoral communities Tanzania. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2018. 98(5): p. 1242–1249. 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Glover-Amengor M., et al., Nutritional status of children 0–59 months in selected intervention communities in northern Ghana from the africa RISING project in 2012. Archives of Public Health, 2016. 74(1): p. 12. 10.1186/s13690-016-0124-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Garenne M., et al., Concurrent wasting and stunting among under‐five children in Niakhar, Senegal. Maternal & child nutrition, 2019. 15(2): p. e12736. 10.1111/mcn.12736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Abdulahi A., et al., Nutritional status of under five children in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 2017. 27(2): p. 175–188. 10.4314/ejhs.v27i2.10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ali Z., et al., The effect of maternal and child factors on stunting, wasting and underweight among preschool children in Northern Ghana. BMC nutrition, 2017. 3(1): p. 31. 10.1186/s40795-017-0154-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Deribew A., et al., Malaria and under-nutrition: a community based study among under-five children at risk of malaria, south-west Ethiopia. PLos one, 2010. 5(5): p. e10775. 10.1371/journal.pone.0010775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Betebo B., et al., Household food insecurity and its association with nutritional status of children 6–59 months of age in east Badawacho District, south Ethiopia. Journal of environmental and public health, 2017. 2017. 10.1155/2017/6373595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Faber J. and Fonseca L.M., How sample size influences research outcomes. Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2014. 19(4): p. 27–29. 10.1590/2176-9451.19.4.027-029.ebo [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Walters S.J., Sample size and power estimation for studies with health related quality of life outcomes: a comparison of four methods using the SF-36. Health and quality of life outcomes, 2004. 2(1): p. 26. 10.1186/1477-7525-2-26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Assefa T., et al., Physician distribution and attrition in the public health sector of Ethiopia. Risk management and healthcare policy, 2016. 9: p. 285. 10.2147/RMHP.S117943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wamai R.G., Reviewing Ethiopia’s health system development. Population (mil), 2004. 75. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Khan J. and Mohanty S.K., Spatial heterogeneity and correlates of child malnutrition in districts of India. BMC public health, 2018. 18(1): p. 1027. 10.1186/s12889-018-5873-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gebreyesus S.H., et al., Local spatial clustering of stunting and wasting among children under the age of 5 years: implications for intervention strategies. Public health nutrition, 2016. 19(8): p. 1417–1427. 10.1017/S1368980015003377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Woldemichael A., et al., Inequalities in healthcare resources and outcomes threatening sustainable health development in Ethiopia: panel data analysis. BMJ open, 2019. 9(1). 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Adugna, A., AYNALEM ADUGNA, JULY 2014 WWW.ETHIODEMOGRAPHYANDHEALTH.ORG.
  • 71.Pawloski L.R., et al., Maternal–child overweight/obesity and undernutrition in Kenya: a geographic analysis. Public health nutrition, 2012. 15(11): p. 2140–2147. 10.1017/S1368980012000110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Spray A.L., et al., Spatial analysis of undernutrition of children in leogane Commune, Haiti. Food and nutrition bulletin, 2013. 34(4): p. 444–461. 10.1177/156482651303400410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gupta A.K. and Santhya K., Proximal and contextual correlates of childhood stunting in India: A geo-spatial analysis. PloS one, 2020. 15(8): p. e0237661. 10.1371/journal.pone.0237661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Srinivas Goli

12 Nov 2020

PONE-D-20-27277

Geographical clustering of under-nutrition and its predictors among under-five children in Ethiopia: Geographically weighted regression Analysis

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. sharew,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

Kindly look at the comments of all four reviewers and revise and resubmit your paper. In particular, I invite your attention to the second reviewer comments. While submitting the revised version, please format the paper according PLOS One Stylistic guidelines. 

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 27 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Srinivas Goli, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.  

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

  • The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

  • A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

  • A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

3. We note that Figures 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted.

All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (a) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (b) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

4. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please delete it from any other section.

Additional Editor Comments:

Kindly look at the comments of all four reviewers and revise and resubmit your paper. In particular, I invite your attention to the second reviewer comments. While submitting the revised version, please format the paper according PLOS One Stylistic guidelines.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Reviewer’s comments

Full title: Geographical clustering of under-nutrition and its predictors among under-five children in Ethiopia: Geographically weighted regression Analysis

Manuscript number: PONE-D-20-27277

Corresponding author: Mequannent Melaku sharew, Mph in health informatics Wollo University Desse, ETHIOPIA

Comments and questions

I appreciate the authors for addressing such highly contextually and culturally affected public health issues. It so concerning that under-nutrition is continued to be a public health problem in Ethiopia. Therefore, evidence regarding the distribution of under-nutrition with its respective determinants is important for decision-making in dealing with its prevention and control program. The paper is well organized and presented. The study presents the findings of original research in the area of public health. And the results have not been published elsewhere. Having adequately performed relevant analyses with sufficient detail; it presents coherent and data-oriented conclusions. The article is presented in an acceptable level English language standard and reporting guideline.

Additional comments and questions

The author would respond to some of the following questions and comments.

1. Title: “Geographical clustering of under-nutrition and its predictors among under-five children in Ethiopia: Geographically weighted regression Analysis”. Since the data for this study comes from the DHS source; it’s good to indicate it in the title. So, the author would restructure the title as…; “Using Geographically weighted regression Analysis to cluster under-nutrition and its predictors among under-five children in Ethiopia: Evidence from demographic and health survey”.

2. Abstract: Line 30: Methods: in the method section of the abstract; the author should indicate that the data comes from DHS. Indicating it is very important as it adds quality to the paper (data from a large population) and attracts the readers at a first impression.

3. Introduction: page: Line 99-10: “Geographical variation of under-nutrition can delay control and elimination of malnutrition which is the underline cause of most childhood disease that in turn brings a high proportion of under-five mortality.” This sentence is not clear or it seems incomplete. It would good for the author to rephrase it?

4. Methods and materials: Study setting: Line 110: the author would briefly discuss information about study settings or Ethiopia. E.g about the nine regional states of Ethiopia and other relevant information to under-nutrition such as urbanization, economic and agricultural practices, etc.

5. Discussion: Line 374 and the Implications of the study: Line 510: It gives more sound meaning if the author could combine discussion points with implications. The author tried to compare the findings of the study with other previous pieces of evidence and discuss discrepancies as well. That’s good. But it would be more informative if the author could also discuss the implications (policy, methodological and practical implications) for each point of discussion and explanations. in so doing, the author would remove the section “Implications of the study in Line 510”.

6. Question: It’s clear that the distribution of under-nutrition in Ethiopia was indicated in DHS 2016. And the determinants as well. My question is; what specific value (scientific or methodological) did your study added to the existing body of evidence? Would you please indicate it clearly in your discussions? Keep in mind my comments in #5 above.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript written in an organized and impressive way. There are minor comments I attached and author has to come up with justification for the comments. I attached the comments in word format for details

Reviewer #3: The author need to address the all the comments properly.

The article can be a good addition in the field of spatial demography provided that author substantially revise the manuscript as per the suggestions.

Reviewer #4: 1. In the abstract part line 31, says that a stratified two stage cluster sampling was used for to include clusters. however, the stratification and stages of sampling has not available in the manuscript. So it is better you will add it in your manuscript.

2. Your manuscript have no page numbers. You have to add it.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Fira Abamecha

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PLOS One Reviewer.docx

Attachment

Submitted filename: REVIEWER COMMENTS ON GEOGRAPHICAL REGRESSION ON NUTRITION ETHIOPIA.docx

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewers Comments.docx

PLoS One. 2021 May 21;16(5):e0248156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248156.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


27 Dec 2020

dear editors, this are some of my answers for your comment

Thank you, dear editor, for the comment.

We have written the manuscript according to PLOSE ONE format using the guideline.

We have revised the language usage, spelling, and grammar of the manuscript.

We have removed the ethics statement that found in the declaration section.

All the figures you noted (5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12) was produced using shape file from open Africa website (https://africaopendata.org/dataset/ethiopia-shapefiles) which freely available website and enumeration area shape file from DHS website(https://dhsprogram.com/data/dataset_admin/login_main.cfm?CFID=1242368&CFTOKEN=c892a8da9855f981-8D71EDAA-BF68-5950-1D6BA7F0BB37D5E8) and the we have produced the figures by ArcGIS version 10.7 software. Permission letter to use the Ethiopian enumeration area shape file and non-spatial data is attached as supplementary information(S5). For this reason, we have incorporated the source of Ethiopia shape file URL in each figure.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Rebuttal letter final undernutrition.docx

Decision Letter 1

Srinivas Goli

22 Feb 2021

Using geographically weighted regression Analysis to cluster under-nutrition and its predictors among under-five children in Ethiopia: Evidence from demographic and health survey

PONE-D-20-27277R1

Dear Dr. sharew,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Srinivas Goli, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

All comments have been addressed

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #4: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: Thank you Authors. The comments I raised were adequately addressed and in a coherent way. The research is well edited and addressed issues I raised in the previous review process. The only point I have is that figures given are too many and if there is a way to shorten it , the paper will be clear for the readers of the article.

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: Yes: Adem Abdulkadir Abdi

Reviewer #4: No

Acceptance letter

Srinivas Goli

7 Apr 2021

PONE-D-20-27277R1

Using geographically weighted regression analysis to cluster under-nutrition and its predictors among under-five children in Ethiopia: Evidence from demographic and health survey

Dear Dr. Melaku:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Srinivas Goli

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Conceptual frame work of the study.

    (PDF)

    S2 File. Variance inflation factor for stunting.

    (PDF)

    S3 File. Variance inflation factor for wasting.

    (PDF)

    S4 File. Variance inflation factor for underweight.

    (PDF)

    S5 File. Letter of approval to use DHS data.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PLOS One Reviewer.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: REVIEWER COMMENTS ON GEOGRAPHICAL REGRESSION ON NUTRITION ETHIOPIA.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewers Comments.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Rebuttal letter final undernutrition.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are available from the Demographic Health Surveys Program (https://dhsprogram.com/).


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES