Abstract
Background:
Placenta previa is a major cause of hemorrhage affecting 0.4–0.5% of all pregnancy's early detection of cases and senior input will significantly reduce maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality.
Objectives:
The aim of the study is to determine risk factors, fetal and maternal outcome in pregnancy complicated by placenta previa.
Method:
This is descriptive cross-sectional study in women diagnosed with placenta previa at Dongola maternity hospital, Sudan from December 2018 to June 2019.
Results:
There were 3,674 deliveries and 52 cases of placenta previa during the study period with prevalence of 1.4%. The average age of the patients was 34.8 years and most of them were above 35 years (53.8%), and (63.5%) were para 3 and more. Other identified risk factors included previous cesarean section (69.1%), previous uterine evacuation (13.5%), and assisted reproductive technique (5.8%). Maternal complications were hemorrhage needing blood transfusion (40.4%), cesarean hysterectomy (21.2%), and bladder injury (3.8%), but (34.6%) were with good outcome and no maternal death. NICU admission with RDS (25%), prematurity (25%), and death (5.8%) were the fetal complications, while in (44.2%) fetal outcome was good.
Conclusion:
The most identifiable risk factors for placenta previa were previous uterine scars, advanced maternal age, and multiparity. And it is associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes.
Keywords: Antepartum hemorrhage, Dongola, placenta previa, Sudan
Introduction
Obstetric hemorrhage is an important cause of maternal and neonatal death and morbidity in developing world. Placenta previa represent 1/5th of antepartum bleeding,[1] affecting 0.4–0.5% of all pregnancies.[2] Placenta previa is classified into major or minor depending on its relation to internal os.[3]
Risk factors are: uterine surgery, advanced maternal age >35, multiparty, multiple gestation, dilatation and curettage, history of placenta previa (4–8%), assisted reproductive technology, non-spacing, smoking, cocaine use, low socioeconomic status, and male fetus.[4,5,6,7] Placentation type proved recently to be associated with serious complications, placenta previa spectrum mainly percreta is disastrous, which is diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging.[8]
There is direct proportion between placenta previa and number of previous cesarean delivery in Sudan.[9] Transvaginal scan is the gold standard for diagnosis of placenta previa.[2]
Placenta previa is better to be managed in tertiary centres and individualized.[10]
The aim of the study is to address risk factors, maternal and neonatal outcome because of lack of research in my country.
Subjects and Methods
Prospective cross-sectional hospital-based study done in a 6 months' period from December 2018 to June 2019 and conducted at Dongola maternity hospital in Sudan.
Total coverage of cases diagnosed with placenta previa attended at Dongola maternity hospital during the study period. Patients managed as per protocol until discharge. Data had been collected through a structured pretested questionnaire and analyzed using simple percentage.
The study approved by Sudan Medical specialization board ethical committee, northern state ministry of health and Dongola maternity hospital, and a written consent was taken from all participants.
Results
Total number of patients delivered during the study period were 3,674. Fifty-two patients were diagnosed as placenta previa (1.4%). The highest incidence of placenta previa was in the age group 30–34 and 35–39 which was 30.77% for each group. The average age of the patients was 34.8 years. The majority of the patients were of parity 1–4. Thirty-six patients had previous scar in the study in a percentage of (69.23%) as seen in Table 1. Followed by history of D&C or evacuation in seven patients (13.5%), three patients had history of ART (5.77%). Grand maternity was seen in three cases (5.77%), and in three patients (5.77%); no identifiable risk factor was present. Most of the patients have more than one risk factor. Eighteen of the patients in this study had no complications (34.62%), the most common maternal complication was hemorrhage, which required blood transfusion in 21 cases (40.38%), followed by hysterectomy in 11 cases (21.15%), 2 cases of bladder injury (3.85%), and no maternal death as presented in Table 2. Figure 1 illustrates method of diagnosis, 42 patients were diagnosed as having placenta previa by transabdominal scan (80.77%), 7 (13.5%) cases were diagnosed through transvaginal scan and three cases were discovered accidently during cesarean section (5.77%). Twenty-three (44.23%) of the babies had no complications. Thirteen (25%) were preterm, 13 babies (25%) were admitted to NICU, and three cases were fresh stillbirth (5.77%) as shown in Figure 2.
Table 1.
Percentage of risk factors of placenta previa among the patients (n=52)
| Risk factor | No of patients | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Previous scar | 36 | 69.23 |
| D&C or evacuation | 7 | 13.46 |
| ART | 3 | 5.77 |
| Multiparity | 3 | 5.77 |
| No risk | 3 | 5.77 |
Table 2.
Patients distribution according to maternal complications (n=52)
| Complication | No of patients | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| No | 18 | 34.62 |
| Blood transfusion | 21 | 40.38 |
| Hysterectomy | 11 | 21.15 |
| Bladder injury | 2 | 3.85 |
Figure 1.

Patient's distribution of cases depending on method of diagnosis (n = 52). CS: Cesarean section TVS: Transvaginal scan TAS: Transabdominal scan
Figure 2.

Percentage of fetal complications in placenta previa cases (n = 52)
Discussion
In our study, i the Incidence of placenta previa is 1.4% which is higher than the international incidence 0.4–0.8% as concluded in a meta-analysis.,[8] and less than 2% in Shruthi et al. study.[11]
Rate of cesarean section in this study is very high (57.7%) compared to international rate which is (6% and 27.2%), but similar to Brazil (55.6%) and Egypt (51.8%).[12]
Women with previous cesarean section are at higher risk of developing placenta previa as confirmed in many previous studies,[10] This is the most identifiable risk factor in our study (69.23%).[10]
Evacuation of retained products of conception is more frequent among women with placenta previa as shown in previous reports[6]; this was noted in13.46% of patients in the current study. Other identified risk factor includes ART (assisted reproductive technology) as noted elsewhere.[13]
In 5.77% of cases, there is no identified risk factor and even higher percentage in Dr AS Anzaku study which showed 37%. However, genital tuberculosis, sexually acquired diseases, and infestations are common in the tropics may cause intrauterine adhesions which per se risk factor.[14]
The highest maternal complication in this study was hemorrhage, which required blood transfusion (40.38%) as in Adere study.[15] In our study, (21.15%) of patients had hysterectomy to control bleeding, interestingly this is similar to what has concluded in previous studies.[16]
Adverse fetal outcome occurred in our study is (55.77%), in a form of prematurity (25%), NICU (neonatal intensive care unit) admission (25%) and mortality (5.77%). In Martina et al. study, adverse fetal outcome occurred in about 60%.[17] Although most of the babies in this study were not extremely preterm, however, late preterm may suffer a lot of health problems in the future.[18]
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Key Messages
Placenta previa is rising, early detection and planning of management, improvement in blood bank services will improve maternal and fetal outcome. Medical evacuation of retained products of conception and avoidance of unnecessary cesarean section will reduce the incidence.
References
- 1.Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. The effect of placenta previa on neonatal mortality: A population –based study in the United States, 1989 through 1997. AM J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:1299–304. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cresswell JA, Ronsmans C, Calvert C, Filippi V. Prevalence of placenta praevia by world region: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop Med Int Health. 2013;18:712–24. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Baker PN, Kenny LC. Obstetrics by Ten Teachers. 19th ed. London: Hodder Arnold; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rosenberg T, Pariente G, Sergienko R, Wiznitzer A, Sheiner E. Critical analysis of risk factors and outcome of placenta previa. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284:47–51. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1598-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhang L, Li P, He GL, Liu XH, Yang TZ, Luo H, Tian Y. [Value of prenatal diagnosis of placenta previa with placenta increta by transabdominal color Doppler ultrasound] Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2006;41:799–802. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Daskalakis G, Simou M, Zacharakis D, Detorakis S, Akrivos N, Papantoniou N, et al. Impact of placenta previa on obstetric outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;114:238–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:262.e1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Warshak CR, Eskander R, Hull AD, Scioscia AL, Mattrey RF, Benirschke K, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:573–81. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000233155.62906.6d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Milosević J, Lilić V, Tasić M, Radović-Janosević D, Stefanović M, Antić V. [Placental complications after a previous cesarean section] Med Pregl. 2009;62:212–6. doi: 10.2298/mpns0906212m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jauniaux E, Alfirevic Z, Bhide AG, Belfort MA, Burton GJ, Collins SL, et al. Placenta praevia and placenta accreta: Diagnosis and management: Green-top guideline No.27a. BJOG. 2019;126:e1–48. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Prasanth S, Mehta P, Rajeshwari KS. Maternal and fetal outcome of placenta previa in a tertiary care institute: A prospective two year study. Indian J Obstetrics and Gynecology Research. 2016;3:274–8. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: Global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0148343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ahmed IA. Prevalence and risk factors of placenta previa in Saudi Arabia and Sudan 2016. Int J Curr Res Med Sci. 2016;2:22–37. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Anzaku AS, Musa J. Placenta praevia: Incidence, risk factors, maternal and fetal outcomes in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Jos J Med. 2012;6:42–6. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Adere A, Mulu A, Temesgen F. Neonatal and maternal complications of placenta praevia and its risk factors in Tikur Anbessa specialized and Gandhi Memorial Hospitals: Unmatched Case-Control Study? J Pregnancy. 2020;2020:5630296. doi: 10.1155/2020/5630296. doi: 10.1155/2020/5630296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Daskalakis G, Simou M, Zacharakis D, Detorakis S, Akrivos N, Papantoniou N, et al. Impact of placenta previa on obstetric outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;114:238–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.HS C, BL NG, Kumar A, Ramaiah R. Maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with major degree placenta previa at ESIC MC and PGIMSR. Galore Int J Health Sci Res. 2020;5:42–52. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Baron IS, Erickson K, Ahronovich MD, Baker R, Litman FR. Cognitive deficit in preschoolers born late-preterm. Early Hum Dev. 2011;87:115–9. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
