Abstract
Objective:
Early seizures are a common complication of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), occurring in ~10% of patients. However, the independent effect of early seizures on patient outcomes, particularly health-related quality of life (HRQoL), is unclear. Without a potential benefit to patient outcomes, the widespread use (~40%) of prophylactic seizure medications has no reasonable chance of improving patient outcomes. We tested the hypothesis that HRQoL at follow-up is different between patients with and without early seizures (and secondarily, with non-convulsive status epilepticus) after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).
Design:
Patients with ICH were enrolled in an observational cohort study that prospectively collected clinical data and HRQoL at follow-up.
Setting:
Academic medical center.
Patients:
133 patients whose HRQoL was assessed three months after ICH onset.
Measurements and Main Results:
HRQoL was obtained at three months after ICH onset. T Scores of HRQoL were modeled with multivariable linear models accounting for severity with the ICH Score and hematoma location. HRQoL was measured with NIH Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System/Neuro-QOL, expressed in T Scores (US normal 50±10). The modified Rankin Scale (mRS, a global measure) was a secondary outcome. There were 12 (9%) patients with early seizures. T Scores of HRQoL at follow-up were lower (worse) in patients with early seizure compared to patients without an early seizure, 44 [32.75 – 51.85] vs. 30.25 [18.9 – 39.15], (P=0.04); results for other domains of HRQoL were similar. The association persisted in multivariable models. There was no association between early seizures and prophylactic seizure medications (P=0.4). Results for patients with non-convulsive status epilepticus were similar. There was no association between early seizures and the mRS at three months.
Conclusions:
Early seizures and non-convulsive status epilepticus were associated with lower HRQoL at follow-up in survivors of ICH.
Keywords: Intracerebral hemorrhage, quality of life, seizure medications
INTRODUCTION
Early seizures are a common and morbid complication of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Of the approximately hundred thousand Americans in whom ICH occurs each year, a seizure will occur in approximately 10% during the first week after ICH (defined as “early seizures”), and up to 35–50% of patients months to years later (“late seizures”).(1) Early seizures are plausibly associated with worse outcome after ICH. Early seizures increase the risk of subsequent brain herniation, poor outcome,(2) and may progress to non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). The longer seizures and NCSE persist, the worse the patient’s outcome is likely to be.(3–5) If the patient survives the hospitalization, early seizures predict late seizures.(1) Preventing early seizures is a rational therapeutic strategy to improve patient outcomes.
Previous investigations have found no association between early seizures and patient outcomes.(6) Several potential explanations for this reported lack of association exist. Early seizures may be insufficient to independently worsen patient outcomes, particularly in patients with already have high severity of ICH,(2) who are likely to have a dismal prognosis regardless of whether early seizures occur or not. Further, measurements of global patient outcomes are fairly crude, and may not detect meaningful differences in patient outcomes that do not include a transition from dependent or dead (“poor outcome”) to independent (“good outcome”).(7)
Measurement of patient outcomes after ICH generally use global, ordinal scores that focus on independence such as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS).(7) The assessment of patients with seizures, however, more often includes health-related quality of life (HRQoL), which is negatively impacted by seizures.(8) Sensitive, valid measures of HRQoL have become widely available, such as the NIH Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Neuro-QOL.(9–12) PROMIS and Neuro-QOL measures broadly track the mRS while being more granular in patients with ICH,(9, 11) and might be more sensitive for detecting a difference in patients who survive. In particular, HRQoL in the domain of mobility closely tracks the mRS.(13) We tested the hypothesis that early seizures were associated with lower mobility HRQoL in survivors of ICH.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Our methods have been described in a previous report.(14) In brief, patients with spontaneous ICH were identified on admission to a neurological intensive care unit. Patients with a structural lesion (e.g., tumor, aneurysm), hemorrhagic conversion of an ischemic stroke, and trauma were excluded. Demographic information, medical history, the ICH Score (a composite of age, hematoma volume, intraventricular hemorrhage, hematoma location, and level of consciousness),(15) imaging data, early seizures, and NCSE were prospectively recorded.
Ethical Approval:
The proposal was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). Patients provided consent for data acquisition. If the patient could not be consented due to neurologic injury, a legally authorized representative provided consent. The IRB provided a waiver for decedents, and for patients who could not consent due to neurologic injury and for whom no legally authorized representative could be identified (e.g., an “unbefriended” patient).
Identification of Seizures and NCSE:
Clinical seizures were prospectively recorded by a board-certified neurologist. Per intensive care units protocol, all patients with altered consciousness underwent continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring. NCSE was prospectively documented by the presence of a diagnostic EEG by expert interpretation (SUS, SvH) as previously described.(16, 17) NCSE and seizures were scored separately, i.e., a patient could have NCSE discovered on EEG monitoring without a clinical seizure.
HRQoL Assessment:
As previously reported,(18, 19) we obtained outcomes with Neuro-QOL, which are validated, standardized tests in specific domains of HRQoL. Neuro-QOL is similar to the NIH Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), and was validated with proxy report as part of its development, a necessary condition for obtaining outcomes in patients who may have difficulty communicating.(20) We included data from patients from May 2011 through 2018 who survived to post-hospitalization follow-up. We analyzed data on mobility HRQoL, as previously reported.(12, 13) We report results on three months here because at one month some patients are still in rehabilitation, rendering many questions about independence moot, and to avoid potential bias in carrying results forward from one month. Results are reported in T Scores normalized to the US general population at 50 ± 10, i.e., the average person in the US will have a score about 50. As previously described, 0.5 SD, 5 points on the T Score, is considered a meaningful difference.(21) We also obtained outcomes with the mRS at three months as previously described, using a validated questionnaire.(22)
Statistical Analysis:
Normally distributed data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and were compared between groups with analysis of variance. Non-normally distributed data are reported as median [Q1 – Q3] and were compared with Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis H as appropriate. Categorical data (e.g., occurrence of early seizures) are reported as proportions and were compared using a chi-square or Fisher’s Exact Test as appropriate. Tests were two-sided. Linear models were constructed to estimate T Scores of HRQoL using the lm command with standard software (R Studio v1.1.453, R v3.6). We included ICH Score as a covariate of overall severity of ICH, and hematoma location because they are potential confounders of early seizures and HRQoL.(23)
RESULTS
Of 503 patients with ICH, 211 died by three months follow-up. Of the 292 surivors, we obtained HRQoL at three months in 133 patients. Demographics, stratified by early seizures, are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Variable | No Early Seizures (N=123) | Early Seizures (N=12) | P |
---|---|---|---|
Age, years | 62 (51 – 69) | 65.5 (62 – 70.2) | 0.1 |
International Normalized Ratio | 1 (1 – 1.1) | 1 (1.0 – 1.2) | 0.9 |
Women | 48 (39) | 5 (42) | 0.9 |
Other | 6 (6) | 0 | |
Not determined | 2 | ||
Other/Not Determined | 7 (6) | 0 | |
Glasgow Coma Scale on admission | 15 (13 – 15) | 10 (7 – 14) | 0.003 |
Hematoma Volume on admission, mL | 6 (2 – 12.2) | 6.5 (2 – 16.7) | 0.6 |
Intraventricular Hemorrhage | 43 (36) | 3 (25) | 0.5 |
Prophylactic Phenytoin | 3 (2) | 0 | 0.9 |
Prophylactic Levetiracetam | 25 (20) | 3 (25) | 0.7 |
N(%), Mean ± SD, Median [Q1 – Q3]
There were 12 (9%) patients with early seizures, all of which occured within four days of ICH symptom onset. Other than a lower Glasgow Coma Scale on admission, demographics were similar between patients with and without early seizures (Table 1). In the five patients with NCSE, three of whom also had clinical seizures. NCSE and early seizures were associated (OR 19.0, 95% CI 1.9 – 255.3, P=0.004).
Measures of mobility HRQoL at three months were worse in patients with an early seizure (Figure). T Scores of mobility HRQoL for patients with seizures were lower than for patients without seizures, 30.25 [18.9 – 39.15] vs. 44 [32.75 – 51.85] (P=0.04). In multivariable models, T Scores of mobility HRQoL were significantly associated with early seizure and ICH Score without additional contribution from lobar hematoma location (Table 2). Results were similar for patients with NCSE. While patients with early seizures had lower T Scores of HRQoL in all domains tested, there were no significant difference in T scores for patients with and without early seizures in the domains of cognitive function (49.5 vs. 49.7), social roles and activities (46.3 vs. 43.6), or anxiety (48.1 vs. 43.9, P>0.2 for all). The mRS was not different between patients with or without seizures (P=0.3) or NCSE (P=0.1).
Table 2.
Model with Early Seizure | Model with NCSE | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Estimate (95% CI) | P | Estimate (95% CI) | P |
Early Seizure | −8.5 (−16.7 to −0.5) | 0.03 | - | - |
NCSE | - | - | −19.3 (−31 to −7.6) | 0.001 |
ICH Score, per point | −6.2 (−8.5 to −3.9) | <0.001 | −6.4 (−8.6 to −4.2) | <0.001 |
Lobar Hematoma Location | 5.1 (−0.1 – 10.5) | 0.06 | 4.8 (−0.3 to 9.9) | 0.06 |
NCSE, non-convulsive status epilepticus. NCSE and early seizures were not combined in a single model because they are highly correlated - see text for details.
DISCUSSION
We tested the hypothesis that early seizures were associated with lower HRQoL at three months follow-up. We found that early seizures were independently associated with lower T Scores of HRQoL in survivors.
Previous investigations have found no association between early seizures and patient outcomes. While we found no association between early seizures and the mRS, the usual patient outcome after ICH, we found an association with T Scores of HRQoL. Two potential explanations for the association seem logical. First, T Scores of HRQoL closely track the mRS,(10–12) however, they are more statistically sensitive because they are normally distributed numbers rather than categories.(24) This suggests that previous investigations may have been underpowered to detect a difference of early seizures on patient outcomes. Second, HRQoL is measured only in survivors. Thus, our results may apply to a subgroup of patients with less severe ICH who survive to follow-up.
Patients with early seizures had a lower Glasgow Coma Scale on presentation. This is not surprising, as seizure are associated with reduced consciousness. This potential imbalance is captured by the ICH Score, which includes the Glasgow Coma Scale, as well as intraventricular hemorrhage, age, infratentorial hematoma location, and hematoma volume.(15, 25) We also included lobar hematoma location, as could potentially confound associations with seizures and NCSE, although this did not meaningfully affect the association we found.
Our rates of early seizures is similar to results we previously reported.(26) Other groups have reported higher rates of seizures.(2) Reasons for different rates of early seizures with similar patient characteristics are speculative; it is possible that cohorts with a higher rate of lobar hematoma would be more likely to have a higher proportion of patients with early seizures. It would be interesting to note if other institutions with a higher incidence of early seizures find a similar effect on patient outcomes.
We measured HRQoL using Neuro-QOL mobility. We have previously reported that T Scores from this instrument are highly correlated with the mRS in survivors of ICH, with “poor outcome” indicating T Scores of <35, indicating that patients with early seizures were likely to be dependent.(13) Others have reported that other PROMIS (e.g., general physical function) measures perform similarly to mobility HRQoL.(10) The questions used to calculate the T Scores are straightforward and easy to observe (e.g., ability to walk, carry groceries, rise from a chair) for patients who cannot report their own outcomes, although proxy reporting is also sometimes necessary for assessment of the mRS. Other domains of HRQoL were lower in patients with early seizures, however, none were statistically significant. While a global measure of HRQoL would have been desirable, it was not collected in this cohort. Additionally, many patients did not have HRQoL data. We have previously noted that patients who are neurologically devastated are less likely to be able to provide HRQoL data, underscoring that these results are most likely to apply to patients likely to survive. We only included HRQoL measured at three months, a typical time to assess outcomes in clinical trials and for the assessment of the mRS by the Joint Commission. However, it is possible that later assessments of HRQoL would be valuable and provide additional time for patients to recover.
These data do not include a prospective determination of late seizures and later seizure medications, previously defined as seizures occurring more than one week after ICH onset.(1) Early seizures are a risk factor for late seizures. One would reasonably expect that late seizures would lead to worse HRQoL, although this association could potentially be confounded by early seizures. Unmeasured late seizures would probably strengthen the association we report between early seizures and lower HRQoL.
Prophylactic seizure medications are prescribed to more patients than have a seizure after ICH.(27) In this cohort, levetiracetam was most common, as phenytoin prophylaxis was essentially abandoned by the time we began to collect HRQoL at follow-up. It is logical that lobar hematoma location, early seizures, NCSE, late seizures, and seizure medication are correlated. While there are no evidence-based protocols or guidelines for administering prophylactic seizure medications, clinicians are most likely to do so in patients with a lobar hematoma,(28) likely because it is a described risk factor for late seizures.(1) While levetiracetam has been associated with lower HRQoL in cognitive function after ICH,(29) to our knowledge, levetiracetam has not been associated with mobility HRQoL. Thus, confounding by prophylactic seizure medication is unlikely to account for the results.
In summary, we found that early seizures were associated with worse HRQoL at follow-up in survivors of ICH. The association of early seizures and worse mobility HRQoL persisted after correction for severity of ICH and lobar hematoma location. Future research should clarify if preventing early seizures is a rational strategy to improve outcomes after ICH.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
All those who contributed to the manuscript are listed as an author.
Disclosures:
Dr. Naidech reports disclosures from AHRQ (K18 HS023437) and NIH (R01 NS110779, U01 NS110772)
Dr. Maas reports disclosures from NIH (K23 NS092975, L30 NS080176)
Dr Bleck received support from National Institutes of Health 1DP2HD101400, U54 NS100064, U01 NS088034, and U01 NS069498.
Research reported in this publication was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health’s National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences grant UL1 TR000150.
Copyright form disclosure: Dr. Naidech’s institution received funding from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Drs. Naidech and Maas’ institutions received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Drs. Naidech, Weaver, Maas, and Schuele received support for article research from the NIH. Dr. Weaver’s institution received funding from the NIH R01 Grant. Dr. Bleck received funding from Ceribell, Marinus, and Portola. Dr. VanHaerents received funding from Athenum Partners. Dr. Schuele received funding from Sunovion, Greenwich, and Eisai.
References
- 1.Haapaniemi E, Strbian D, Rossi C, Putaala J, et al. : The CAVE score for predicting late seizures after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2014; 45(7):1971–1976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vespa PM, O’Phelan K, Shah M, Mirabelli J, et al. : Acute seizures after intracerebral hemorrhage: a factor in progressive midline shift and outcome. Neurology 2003; 60(9):1441–1446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Claassen J, Albers D, Schmidt JM, De Marchis GM, et al. : Nonconvulsive seizures in subarachnoid hemorrhage link inflammation and outcome. Ann Neurol 2014; 75(5):771–781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Claassen J, Perotte A, Albers D, Kleinberg S, et al. : Nonconvulsive seizures after subarachnoid hemorrhage: Multimodal detection and outcomes. Ann Neurol 2013; 74(1):53–64 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.De Marchis GM, Pugin D, Meyers E, Velasquez A, et al. : Seizure burden in subarachnoid hemorrhage associated with functional and cognitive outcome. Neurology 2016; 86(3):253–260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mackey J, Blatsioris AD, Moser EAS, Carter RJL, et al. : Prophylactic Anticonvulsants in Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2017; 27(2):220–228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Saver JL, Gornbein J: Treatment effects for which shift or binary analyses are advantageous in acute stroke trials. Neurology 2009; 72(15):1310–1315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ridsdale L, Wojewodka G, Robinson E, Landau S, et al. : Characteristics associated with quality of life among people with drug-resistant epilepsy. J Neurol 2017; 264(6):1174–1184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Katzan IL, Lapin B: PROMIS GH (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health) Scale in Stroke: A Validation Study. Stroke 2018; 49(1):147–154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Katzan IL, Thompson NR, Lapin B, Uchino K: Added Value of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Stroke Clinical Practice. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6(7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Katzan IL, Fan Y, Uchino K, Griffith SD: The PROMIS physical function scale: A promising scale for use in patients with ischemic stroke. Neurology 2016; 86(19):1801–1807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Naidech AM, Beaumont JL, Berman M, Liotta E, et al. : Web-Based Assessment of Outcomes After Subarachnoid and Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A New Patient Centered Option for Outcomes Assessment. Neurocrit Care 2015; 23(1):22–27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Naidech AM, Beaumont JL, Berman M, Francis B, et al. : Dichotomous “Good Outcome” Indicates Mobility More Than Cognitive or Social Quality of Life. Crit Care Med 2015; 43(8):1654–1659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Maas MB, Rosenberg NF, Kosteva AR, Bauer RM, et al. : Surveillance neuroimaging and neurologic examinations affect care for intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 2013; 81(2):107–112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hemphill J, Bonovich D, Besmertis L, Manley G, et al. : The ICH Score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2001; 32:891–897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.González Otárula KA, Mikhaeil-Demo Y, Bachman EM, Balaguera P, et al. : Automated seizure detection accuracy for ambulatory EEG recordings. Neurology 2019; 92(14):e1540–e1546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Naidech AM, Garg RK, Liebling S, Levasseur K, et al. : Anticonvulsant Use and Outcomes After Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke 2009; 40:3810–3815 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Naidech AM, Beaumont JL, Rosenberg NF, Maas MB, et al. : Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Delirium Symptoms: length of stay, function and quality of life in a 114-patient cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188(11):1331–1337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sangha RS, Caprio FZ, Askew R, Corado C, et al. : Quality of life in patients with TIA and minor ischemic stroke. Neurology 2015; 85(22):1957–1963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cella D, Lai JS, Nowinski CJ, Victorson D, et al. : Neuro-QOL: brief measures of health-related quality of life for clinical research in neurology. Neurology 2012; 78(23):1860–1867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bath PM, Lees KR, Schellinger PD, Altman H, et al. : Statistical analysis of the primary outcome in acute stroke trials. Stroke 2012; 43(4):1171–1178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Saver JL, Filip B, Hamilton S, Yanes A, et al. : Improving the Reliability of Stroke Disability Grading in Clinical Trials and Clinical Practice: The Rankin Focused Assessment (RFA). Stroke 2010; 41(5):992–995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Delcourt C, Sato S, Zhang S, Sandset EC, et al. : Intracerebral hemorrhage location and outcome among INTERACT2 participants. Neurology 2017; 88(15):1408–1414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bath PM, Gray LJ, Collier T, Pocock S, et al. : Can we improve the statistical analysis of stroke trials? Statistical reanalysis of functional outcomes in stroke trials. Stroke 2007; 38(6):1911–1915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schmidt FA, Liotta EM Prabhakaran S Naidech AM, et al. : Assessment and comparison of the max-ICH score and ICH score by external validation. Neurology 2018; 91(10):e939–e946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Naidech AM Garg RK Liebling S Levasseur K, et al. : Anticonvulsant Use and Outcomes After Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke 2009; 40:3810–3815 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sheth KN, Martini SR, Moomaw CJ, Koch S, et al. : Prophylactic Antiepileptic Drug Use and Outcome in the Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Study. Stroke 2015; 46(12):3532–3535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pinto D, Prabhakaran S, Tipton E, Naidech AM: Why Physicians Prescribe Prophylactic Seizure Medications after Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Adaptive Conjoint Analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2020; 29(4):104628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Naidech AM, Beaumont J, Muldoon K, Liotta EM, et al. : Prophylactic Seizure Medication and Health-Related Quality of Life After Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Crit Care Med 2018; 46(9):1480–1485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]