Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 May 24;57(4):582–588. doi: 10.1134/S1070428021040126

Synthesis and In Silico Study of 4-Substituted 1-Aminoanthraquinones

V I Shupeniuk 1,, N Amaladoss 2, T N Taras 1, O P Sabadakh 1, N P Matkivskyi 1
PMCID: PMC8141824

Abstract

Eight new 4-substituted 1-amino-9,10-anthraquinones containing a primary amino group were syn­the­sized by nucleophilic substitution of bromine in 1-amino-4-bromo-9,10-anthraquinones. 1-Amino-4-[2-(hy­droxy­ethyl)amino]-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydroanthracene-2-sulfonic acid containing a biogenic amine fragment (2-aminoethanol) was converted into the corresponding 1-triazenyl derivatives. The structure of the synthesized compounds was determined on the basis of the LC/MS and 13C and 1H NMR data, and their drug likeness was estimated in silico. Compounds with a good drug likeness score were analyzed by DIGEP-Pred, their possible interactions with proteins were simulated using STRING, and their biological activity was interpreted using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

Keywords: bromaminic acid; Ullmann reaction; LC/MS; 4-substituted 9,10-anthraquinones; triazenes; genes

INTRODUCTION

Formerly, anthraquinone derivatives were histori­cally important natural dyes. Later, it was found that the planar tricyclic anthraquinone system gives rise to a broad spectrum of biologically important properties (Fig. 1) [12]. At present, anthraquinone derivatives are extensively studied as therapeutic agents against COVID-19, specifically acting against 3CLpro and PLpro proteases [3].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Biological activity of anthraquinone derivatives.

A large number of anthraquinone derivatives con­tain a sulfonate group in the 2-position. These com­pounds can be synthesized from bromaminic acid sodium salt 1 (Fig. 2) which is the basic starting mate­rial for the preparation of biologically active anthra­quinone derivatives and numerous dyes [46]. In fact, bromaminic acid and its salts are widely used as inter­mediate products for the synthesis of anthraquinone derivatives, including acid dyes, via substitution of the 4-bromine atom by (aryl)alkylamino group [79].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Synthesis of 4-substituted 1-aminoanthraquinones.

There are almost no published data on chemical properties of triazenyl-substituted anthraquinones [10, 11]. Triazene moiety is a known alkylating carci­nolytic group. It was introduced into anthraquinone molecule by azo coupling of anthraquinone-1-diazo­nium salt with various aliphatic and aromatic amines.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

While developing an optimal procedure for the sub­stitution of bromine in bromaminic acid 1, we tried different known nucleophilic substitution methods [12, 13] and performed a series of reactions of brom­aminic acid 1 and its 2-methyl analog 2 with 2-amino­ethanol under different conditions; however, the yields were not always satisfactory (Scheme 1). We found that the most efficient procedure was to react com­pound 1 or 2 with 2-aminoethanol in aqueous medium in the presence of a mixture of copper(II) and iron(II) salts [14]. In this case, the yield of target 1-amino-4-[(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydroan­thra­cene-2-sulfonic acid (5) was 96% (m/z 362.0 [M + H]+). The structure of 5 was confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR spectra and elemental analysis. Compound 6 was obtained in 65% yield, and its 1H NMR spectrum showed signals of the ethylene moiety at δ 3.50 and 3.67 ppm. Under these conditions, broaminic acid 1 was reacted with other primary aliphatic amines to obtain 1,4-diaminoanthraquinone derivatives 712 (Scheme 2).

Scheme.

Scheme

1.

Scheme.

Scheme

2.

Almost all these reactions were accompanied by side formation of 1-amino-4-hydroxy-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydroanthracene-2-sulfonic acid (4) due to con­cur­rent attack of hydroxy nucleophile (Table 1). Further­more, there was a clear relation between the pKa value of the amine and the purity of the product (Scheme 2).

Table 1.

Synthesis of compounds 712

Compound no. Yield, % Impurity of 4, %
7 65 25
8 68 20
9 84 15
10 85 5
11 98 1
12 100

Synthesis of triazenes. In the next step of our study, aminoanthraquinone 5 was subjected to diazo­tiza­tion with sodium nitrite in aqueous medium in the presence of HCl at 0–5°C [1516] (Scheme 3). The subsequent azo coupling of diazonium salts 13 with secondary and primary amines afforded triazenes 1417 (Scheme 4). This reaction was not always smooth, depending on the properties of the initial amine and stability of the diazo coupling products. The structure of 1417 was confirmed by spectral data. The 1H NMR spectra of 1417 showed aromatic protons signals in the region δ 7.50–8.70 ppm.

Scheme.

Scheme

3.

Scheme.

Scheme

4.

Biological activity and drug likeness. Among the 12 synthesized compounds, we identified triazene deriv­atives with good drug likeness scores. In partic­ular, 4-aminobenzoic acid derivative 17 (M 510.08) showed the highest drug likeness score (+0.06). Table 2 contains the detailed drug likeness parameters of the synthesized compounds.

Table 2.

Drug likeness parameters of compounds 517a

Compd. no. Formula Molecular weight NHBA NHBD LogP TPSA, Å2 V, Å3 DLS
5 C16H14N2O6S 362.06 6 5 –0.57 114.29 307.29 –0.73
6 C17H16N2O3 296.12 3 4 2.76 71.87 288.83 –0.16
7 C19H18N2O5S 386.09 5 5 1.40 97.61 340.44 –0.19
8 C17H16N2O5S 360.08 5 4 0.72 96.76 317.25 –0.66
9 C19H18N2O6S 402.09 6 4 0.24 106.48 355.56 –0.17
10 C18H17N3O6S 403.08 7 4 –0.53 110.07 353.50 –0.27
11 C17H16N2O5S 360.08 5 4 0.82 97.63 317.22 –0.57
12 C18H18N2O5S 374.09 5 4 1.34 97.63 335.12 –0.69
14 C18H18N4O8S 450.08 10 5 –0.74 150.24 380.77 –0.79
15 C20H22N4O6S 446.13 8 3 1.18 117.64 399.55 –0.60
16 C20H20N4O7S 460.11 9 3 0.04 126.10 402.62 –0.23
17 C23H18N4O8S 510.08 10 5 1.01 155.40 434.50 0.06

a NHBA is the number of hydrogen bond acceptor centers, NHBD is the number of hydrogen bond donor centers, LogP is the lipophilicity coefficient, TPSA is the topological polar surface area, V is the molecular volume, and DLS is the drug likeness score.

Triazene 14 modulated the largest number of genes (10). The effect on the CHEK1 gene responsible for the p53 signaling pathway directly involved in immune strengthening was revealed. Furthermore, the gene set enrichment analysis showed modulation of 15 different biological pathways, among which cancer pathways are modulated mainly by regulation of three genes (SP1, IL23A, NFE2L2). The results of gene set enrich­ment analysis of protein modulation by anthraquinone derivatives and the corresponding gene codes are col­lected in Table 3. Figure 3 shows interactions between modulated proteins.

Table 3.

Analysis of proteins modulated by anthraquinone derivatives

Pathway ID Description Number of genes Matching genes
hsa05200 Pathways in cancer 3 SP1, IL23A, NFE2L2
hsa05164 Influenza A 2 NXT2, SP1
hsa05133 Pertussis 2 SP1, IL23A
ko04625 C-Type lectin receptor signaling pathway 2 SP1, IL23A
hsa05166 HTLV-I infection 1 CHEK1
hsa05014 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) 1 SP1
hsa05152 Tuberculosis 1 IL23A
hsa05224 Breast cancer 1 SP1
hsa05204 Chemical carcinogenesis 1 CBR1
hsa05225 Hepatocellular carcinoma 1 NFE2L2
hsa05203 Viral carcinogenesis 1 CHEK1
hsa04216 Ferroptosis 1 GSS
hsa05323 Rheumatoid arthritis 1 IL23A
hsa01524 Platinum drug resistance 1 TOP2A
hsa04115 p53 signaling pathway 1 CHEK1

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Interactions between regulated proteins.

EXPERIMENTAL

All chemicals were obtained from commercial sources and were used without further purification. The melting points were measured in open capillary tubes. The 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian 400 spectrometer at 400 MHz using DMSO-d6 as solvent unless otherwise stated. The mass spectra were run on an Agilent 1100 Series high-performance liquid chro­matograph equipped with a diode array detector and an Agilent mass-selective detector with the possibility of rapidly switching between positive and negative ionization modes. The progress of reactions was monitored by TLC on DC-Fertigfolien Alugram Xtra Sil G/UV254 silica gel plates (Germany).

Anthraquinone derivatives with good drug like­ness scores were tested by DIGEP-Pred [17] to identify target proteins (upregulated and downregulated pro­teins) with a probable activity of 0.4. The list of regulated proteins was loaded to STRING [18] to iden­tify biological process, cellular function, and combined gene set. In addition, possible modulation pathways were identified using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

General procedure for the synthesis of anthra­quinone derivatives 5–12. Bromaminic acid 1 (4.04 g, 0.01 mol) was dissolved in 40 mL of hot water (70–80°C), the corresponding amine (0.015 mol) and sodium hydrogen carbonate (0.02 mol) were added in succession, and copper(II) sulfate (0.05 g) and iron(II) sulfate (0.05 g) were then added. The mixture was stirred, heated to 90°C, and kept at that temperature for 4 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored by the disappearance of bromaminic acid 1 (o-xylene–acetone, 4:6). After completion of the reaction, the mixture was cooled to room temperature and acidified with concentrated aqueous HCl, and the precipitate was filtered off and washed with 20% aqueous sodium chloride (60 mL). The blue moist product was dis­solved in hot water (50 mL) and precipitated with concentrated aqueous HCl (3 mL).

1-Amino-4-[(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydroanthracene-2-sulfonic acid (5). Yield 96%, blue solid, mp 287–289°C. 1H NMR spectrum, δ, ppm: 3.49 d (2H, CH2), 3.69 d (2H, CH2), 7.73 s (1H, 3-H), 7.85 t (2H, Harom, J = 7.7 Hz), 8.25 d (2H, Harom, J = 8.0 Hz). 13C NMR spectrum, δC, ppm: 45.29 (CH2), 60.24 (CH2OH), 109.38, 109.67, 121.16, 126.19, 126.36, 132.88, 133.03, 134.43, 134.47, 143.5, 143.79, 145.84 (Carom), 181.17, 182.12 (C=O). Mass spectrum: m/z 364.0 [M + H]+. Found, %: C 53.10; H 4.40; N 6.90; S 7.80. C18H18N2O7S. Calculated, %: C 53.07; H 4.42; N 6.87; S 7.86. M 364.

1-Amino-4-[(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-2-methyl­antracene-9,10-dione (6). Yield 59%, blue solid, mp 300°C. 1H NMR spectrum, δ, ppm 2.30 s (3H, CH3), 3.50–3.60 m (2H, CH2), 3.67 d (2H, CH2, J = 5.2 Hz), 7.34 s (1H, 3-H), 7.68–7.86 m (4H, Harom). Mass spectrum: m/z 297.0 [M + H]+. C17H17N2O3. M 297.

1-Amino-4-[(propan-2-yl)amino]-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydroanthracene-2-sulfonic acid (8). Yield 68%, blue solid, mp 260–262°C. 1H NMR spectrum, δ, ppm: 1.10 s (3H, CH3), 2.20–2.25 m (6H, CH2), 7.70 t (3H, Harom), 8.00 s (2H, Harom), 10.50 s (1H, NH). Mass spectrum: m/z 361.2 [M + H]+. C17H16N2O5S. M 361.

1-Amino-4-[(morpholin-4-yl)amino]-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydroanthracene-2-sulfonic acid (10). Yield 85%, blue solid, mp 282°C. 1H NMR spectrum, δ, ppm: 2.00–2.10 m (4H, CH2), 3.30–4.00 m (4H, CH2), 7.70 s (3H, Harom), 8.20 s (3H, Harom, NH). Mass spec­trum: m/z 406 [M + H]+. C18H17N3O6S. M 402.

1-Amino-4-(propylamino)-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydroanthracene-2-sulfonic acid (11). Yield 98%, blue solid, mp 262°C. 1H NMR spectrum, δ, ppm: 1.00 s (3H, CH3), 1.30–1.35 m (6H, CH2), 7.80 t (3H, Harom), 8.20 s (2H, Harom), 10.80 s (1H, NH). Mass spectrum: m/z 362.2 [M + H]+. C17H16N2O5S. M 361.

1-Amino-4-(butylamino)-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihy­droanthracene-2-sulfonic acid (12). Yield 100%, blue solid, mp 290–292°C. 1H NMR spectrum, δ, ppm: 1.00 s (3H, CH3), 1.60 s (2H, CH2), 7.80 s (3H, Harom), 8.20 s (2H, Harom), 10.70 s (1H, NH). Mass spectrum: m/z: 375.5 [M + H]+. C18H18N2O5S. M 375.

1-(Diazyn-1-ium-l-yl)-4-[(2-hydroxyethyl)­amino]-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydroanthracene-2-sul­fonic acid (13). A 50-mL round-bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer was charged with a solution of anthraquinone 5 (0.1 mmol) in 1 M aqueous HCl (5.0 mL). The solution was cooled to 0–5°C in an ice bath, a solution of sodium nitrite (0.2 mmol) in 0.5 mL of distilled water was added dropwise, maintaining the temperature at 0–5°C, and the mixture was stirred for 5 min at that temperature.

Triazene derivatives 14–17 (general procedure). The mixture containing diazonium salt 13 was allowed to warm up to room temperature, a solution of the corresponding amine (0.15 mmol) in 5 mL of ethanol was added, and the mixture was stirred for ~30 s at room temperature. The progress of the reaction was monitored by change of the color of the reaction mix­ture (the color changed from blue to red after diazotiza­tion, and the final product was purple), as well as by RP-TLC using acetone–water (2:3) as eluent. The prod­uct was purified by reversed phase column chro­matography (RP-18) using water as eluent.

1-[3,3-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)triaz-1-en-1-yl]-4-[(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydroan­thra­cene-2-sulfonic acid (14). Yield 80%. 1H NMR spectrum, δ, ppm: 2.99 s (4H, CH2), 3.40 d (4H, CH2, J = 11.2 Hz), 3.65 s (4H, CH2), 5.08 s (OH), 5.25 s (2H, OH), 7.85 s (2H, Harom), 8.15–8.20 m (2H, Harom), 8.69 s (2H, Harom), 9.87 s (1H, NH). Mass spectrum: m/z 360.9 [M + H]+. C16H12N2O6S. M 361.

4-[(2-Hydroxyethyl)amino]-1-[(E)-(morpholin-4-yl)diazenyl]-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydroanthracene-2-sul­fonic acid (15). Yield 90%. mp >300°C. 1H NMR spectrum, δ, ppm: in DMSO-d6: 3.37 t (1H, CH2, morpholine), 3.43 t (2H, CH2, morpholine), 3.70– 3.75 m (3H, CH2, morpholine), 4.95 s (5H, CH2), 7.62 s (1H, 3-H), 7.86 s (1H, Harom), 7.92 t (1H, Harom, J = 8.0 Hz), 8.17 d (1H, Harom, J = 6.4 Hz), 8.23 d (1H, Harom, J = 7.6 Hz), 9.89 s (1H, OH); in DMSO-d6–CCl4: 3.46 s (2H, CH2), 3.73 s (1H, CH2), 7.67 d (1H, 3-H, J = 6.8 Hz), 7.87–7.90 m (2H, Harom), 8.18 t (1H, Harom, J = 6.0 Hz), 8.28 d (1H, Harom, J = 4.8 Hz), 9.90 s (1H, OH). Mass spectrum: m/z 460 [M]+.

1-(3,3-Diethyltriaz-1-en-1-yl)-4-[(2-hydroxy­ethyl)­amino]-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydroanthracene-2-sulfonic acid (16). Yield 52%. 1H NMR spectrum, δ, ppm: 1.18 s (3H, CH3), 2.86 d (3H, CH3, J = 4.8 Hz), 3.40 s (2H, CH2), 7.66–7.70 m (1H, 3-H), 8.04–8.30 m (8H, Harom), 9.01 s (1H, OH). Mass spectrum: m/z 425.9 [M]+.

4-(3-{4-[(2-Hydroxyethyl)amino]-2-sulfo-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydroanthracen-1-yl}triaz-2-en-1-yl)­benzoic acid (17). Yield 95%, mp >300°C. 1H NMR spectrum, δ, ppm: 1.10 s (1H, CH2), 3.46–3.50 m (2H, CH2, J = 16.0 Hz), 7.20 d (8H, Harom, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.80 d (3H, Harom, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.90 s (4H, NH, OH). Mass spectrum: m/z 466 [M – C22H17O6CH4]+.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of computer simulation suggest the possibility of therapeutic effect of the synthesized substituted anthraquinone derivatives, which needs to be verified using experimental protocols.

Supplementary information

FUNDING

This study was performed under financial support by the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (project no. 0119U103131).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare the absence of conflict of interest.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1134/S1070428021040126.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hussain H., Al-Harrasi A., Al-Rawahi A., Green I., Csuk R., Ahmed I., Shan A., Abbas G., Rehman N., Ullah R. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2015;25:1053. doi: 10.1517/13543776.2015.1050793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Malik E., Muller C. Med. Res. Rev. 2016;36:705. doi: 10.1002/med.21391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Khanal P., Patil B.M., Chand J., Naaz Y. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2020;10:325. doi: 10.1007/s13659-020-00260-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baqi Y., Muller C.E. Org. Lett. 2007;9:1271. doi: 10.1021/ol070102v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baqi Y., Muller C.E. Nat. Protoc. 2010;5:945. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Baqi Y., Alzeler K., Koze M., Muller C.E. J. Med. Chem. 2009;52:3784. doi: 10.1021/jm9003297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Malik E.M., Baqi Y., Müller C.E. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015;11:2326. doi: 10.3762/bioc.11.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Roy S., Large J.R., Akande A.M., Kshatri A., Webb T.I., Domene C., Sergeant G.P., Mchale N.G., Thornbury K.D., Hollywood M.A. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2004;75:426. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fiene A., Baqi Y., Malik E.M., Newton P., Li W., Lee S.-Y., Hartland L.E., Muller C.E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016;24:4363. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2016.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sabadakh O.P., Taras T.N., Luchkevich E.R., Novikov V.P. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2015;51:277. doi: 10.1134/S1070428015020244. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bulgakova N.A., Gornostaev L.M. J. Org. Chem. 2001;37:1351. doi: 10.1023/A:1013164528653. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Topanov A.P., Mashevskaya I.V., Dmitriev M.V., Maslivets A.N. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2020;56:719. doi: 10.1134/S1070428020040247. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kaur G., Utreja D., Jain N., Dhillon N.K. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2020;56:113. doi: 10.1134/S1070428020010182. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shupenyuk V.I., Taras T.N., Sabadakh O.P., Luchke­vich E.R., Kornii Y. Fr.-Ukr. J. Chem. 2020;8:58. doi: 10.17721/fujcV8I1P58-65. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Baqi Y., Muller C.E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012;53:6739. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.09.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Glushkova M.A., Popkov S.V., Burdeinyi M.L. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2020;56:390. doi: 10.1134/S1070428020030045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lagunin A., Ivanov S., Rudik A., Filimonov D., Poroikov V. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:2062. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Szklarczyk, D., Morris, J.H., Cook, H., Kuhn, M., Wyder, S., Simonovic, M., Santos, A., Doncheva, N.T., Roth, A., Bork, P., Jensen, L.J., and von Mering, C., Nucleic Acids Res., 2017, vol. 45, p. D362. 10.1093/nar/gkw937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Russian Journal of Organic Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES