Abstract
National guidance recommends the involvement of speech and language therapists in intensive care particularly for those requiring tracheostomy and ventilation. However, the role of speech and language therapists is poorly understood especially in the context of critical care. This article aims to increase awareness of the background training and skills development of speech and language therapists working in this context to demonstrate their range of specialist abilities. Speech and language therapists support and enhance the process of laryngeal weaning alongside the rehabilitation of speech and swallowing as part of the multidisciplinary team. Examples are provided of the types of interventions that are used and technological innovations that may enhance rehabilitation of oropharyngeal impairments.
Keywords: Deglutition disorders, tracheostomy, nonverbal communication, rehabilitation of speech and language disorders
The history
The role of speech and language therapy (SLT) originated in the 19th century aimed at the correction of speech problems both for elocution and medical disorders. This role was formalised in 1945 and received recognition following speech therapy for King George VI for a severe stammer, famously portrayed in the film ‘The King’s Speech’.1 The professional body was officially awarded royal status in 1995 becoming the Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists (RCSLT). With increased medical involvement, the role has developed further sub specialisms in aphasia, motor speech disorders, head and neck cancer, voice and dysphagia.
As the critical care environment has changed from predominantly sedated and ventilated patients, who do not talk or eat, to a more active rehabilitation setting, this has highlighted the presence of dysphagia and communication impairment, although the role of Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs) in this environment is less familiar.2 As with early mobilisation, SLTs should be involved alongside other therapy colleagues in the early evaluation of laryngeal function to minimise the impact of oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration. A range of interventions are available to facilitate the recovery of speech and swallowing function, which is the key goal for patients wanting a return to normal function.
The specific training path
The training path for all SLTs begins with a degree qualification, which can be completed as an undergraduate bachelors or postgraduate masters’ course. The course covers anatomy, physiology, neurology, linguistics, phonetics, normal and pathological speech, language, voice, and swallowing development as well as acquired disorders of communication and swallowing. Clinical placements ensure development of robust clinical skills in healthcare environments.
Following registration, SLTs tend to specialise in either adult or paediatric caseloads. Adult caseloads are usually in an acute, community or rehabilitation setting and it is common practice for SLTs to work in a variety of these settings as they develop their skill sets. A large focus for SLTs is dysphagia, alongside acquired speech and language impairments. As expertise develops, SLTs will work with more challenging cases, which can include patients requiring a tracheostomy for example due to traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, burns, head and neck cancer or complex medical recovery. This increasingly brings them into the ICU environment to support patients with early communication and rehabilitation for swallowing impairments. This competency development takes place at a local level and depends on SLT level of staffing, expertise and patient caseload to supervise practice.
A number of national guidelines3–5 specify the need for SLT involvement in ICU with a requirement for expertise, experience and seniority to ensure appropriate assessments and interventions are delivered to complex patients, including those requiring ventilation, tracheostomy, and prolonged complex dysphagia and/or communication deficits.6 SLT competencies for ICU in the UK are guided by the RCSLT critical care recommendations and position statement (in preparation) and competency framework for working with tracheostomies.7 With no designated post-registration training for SLTs working in critical care, clinicians acquire these skills through experience and CPD which may include opportunities to shadow other teams and SLT colleagues in addition to attendance at Clinical Excellence Networks. Staff should be routinely supported through a system of clinical supervision from an advanced clinician and comply with clinical governance, which includes the development of competencies. In smaller centres, this supervision may need to be sourced externally. A clinical training programme should be provided to more junior therapists, with multidisciplinary team (MDT) involvement, in order to develop their skills and roles within the ICU setting.8
In hospitals with larger ICUs, SLTs may develop specialised skills for specific populations, such as cardiothoracic surgery, neurosurgery as well as general medicine. SLTs provide treatment for critically ill patients who have an acute neurological or medical condition (including trauma, haemorrhage, tumours, spinal injuries, respiratory conditions) or patients following complex neuro, cardiac and general surgery. These conditions may impact language skills, motor speech, swallowing, cough and voice. In addition to this, the medical interventions required in critical care may have an additional and unrecognised impact. This may include prolonged endotracheal intubation and post-extubation dysphagia and dysphonia.9 Within the ICU setting, patients may also be at risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve damage10 (mainly patients following cardiothoracic intervention or anterior cervical spinal cord surgery), which will further compromise glottic function impacting swallow and voice ability. Early use of fibreoptic nasendoscopy by trained SLTs helps to identify structural, sensory and motor problems in the assessment of swallowing and cough functions.
Regular MDT ICU ward rounds help to review, discuss and support a coordinated rehabilitation approach and set achievable goals to improve outcomes. Following the development of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance QS158,10 each patient should have a rehabilitation prescription completed within 72 hours, outlining their impairments and planned interventions, which would be updated regularly.
The current impact in ICU
The role of SLT on ICU encompasses assessment, rehabilitation and advice in the key areas of communication, swallowing and tracheostomy weaning:
Communication impairment
Early SLT involvement helps to facilitate a successful communication route for all patients on critical care. This is essential to optimise their psychosocial wellbeing, engagement in their day-to-day care and consent decisions. It is well documented that communication difficulties on critical care are a major source of stress.11,12 Links have been identified between patients with communication impairments and delirium.13 SLTs carry out formal and informal assessments of receptive and expressive language (verbal and non-verbal), speech, voice and cognitive communication function. On occasion, communication facilitation may begin when a patient is still intubated but awake and attempting to communicate. The aim will then be to establish a nonverbal communication route to aid communication interaction with family friends and MDT staff on the unit. Nonverbal communication options may include low technology methods for example, partner-assisted scanning of alphabet or picture charts, using eye pointing, finger pointing, writing or high technology devices, such as pillow switches to access communication buttons, IPADs, grid 3 depending on patient ability, and methods of access. Once a successful communication route has been established, it is essential to train family members and staff to consistently use these. Patients are reliant on communication partners and the environment to facilitate alternative methods of communication. For those patients presenting with linguistic or cognitive communication deficits, bespoke communication guidelines are provided to support interactions on the critical care unit. SLTs deliver individualised intervention programmes to work at both a functional and impairment-based levels, for example, word retrieval strategies, increasing insight into communication deficits, self-monitoring and self-correction. SLTs can support patient communication skills during capacity assessments, ensuring they have the most effective tools to help them understand and communicate their own decisions, demonstrating capacity despite a communication deficit. For those patients who have a cuffed tracheostomy in situ, SLT will work with the MDT to aim for early cuff deflation trials (including patients requiring ventilation) evaluating the benefits of a one-way valve to maximise trans-laryngeal airflow to help re-stimulate laryngeal functions for phonation, swallowing and cough. SLTs may need to work with patients to coordinate the respiratory cycle to achieve phonation as this can sometimes take place during an inspiratory rather than expiratory cycle, when ventilated. For patients where cuff deflation is not possible, a method known as Above Cuff Vocalisation (ACV) permits low pressure gas to be passed through the port of a subglottic suction tracheostomy tube whilst maintaining cuff inflation. This has been reported to facilitate phonation in some patients under close guidance.14 This procedure should always involve SLTs who are familiar with anatomy and physiology of the upper airway and specific contraindications and risks associated with this method. Fibreoptic nasendoscopic assessment by SLTs can facilitate identifying those patients appropriate for this technique and the benefit for particular patients.
Swallowing impairment
One of the key aspects of the SLT role within ICU is assessment of oropharyngeal swallow function. This not only includes assessment for suitability of oral diet and fluids but also the ability to swallow and manage oral secretions. As well as bedside assessments, SLTs are able to carry out instrumental assessments of swallow that provide a more detailed view of functional anatomy and physiology for swallowing using multiple textures, which then directs a bespoke intervention. Videofluoroscopy (VFS)15 takes place in the radiology department using radio-opaque material added to food textures which the patient is given orally whilst the passage of food is video recorded to highlight abilities of food manipulation, swallow effectiveness and airway protection and transit to the oesophagus. Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing,16 known as FEES, is a particularly useful tool within ICU, due to its portability compared to VFS, but also the added benefit of directly viewing dynamic pharyngeal and laryngeal anatomy and secretion management. For patient weaning from ventilation and tracheostomy, this can support clinical decisions and often highlight causes of difficulty that can then be resolved.17 SLTs undertaking a FEES assessment would make recommendations for pharmacological management of excessive secretions and therapeutic swallowing interventions to focus on improving swallowing through strengthening base of tongue, pharyngeal constriction and laryngeal range of movement.18 In managing dysphagia, the SLT identifies signs and symptoms of aspiration and informs the team of the need to make a decision on whether to proceed with oral intake. With early screening for dysphagia risks by nurses or SLTs, a preventative approach helps to reduce complications and poorer outcomes.19,20
Tracheostomy weaning
Both swallowing and communication are impacted by the presence of a tracheostomy through redirection of airflow and alterations to valving and pressure systems that power the muscles in normal swallowing. SLTs have specific knowledge and understanding of this physiology and make valuable contributions to MDT decision making regarding tracheostomy manipulation for weaning.21,22 SLTs can optimise communication by supporting cuff deflation and use of one-way valves for phonation. Similarly, trans-laryngeal airflow helps to re-stimulate laryngeal reflexes for swallowing and cough to increase airway safety. In conjunction with respiratory muscle training and biofeedback tools, the rehabilitation of speech and swallowing significantly improves patients’ sense of well-being and perception of quality of life,23 enabling them to engage in normal social functions again.
The future
National guidance in the UK recognises and supports SLTs as key members of the critical care MDT5 promoting early intervention to manage dysphagia, communication and a team approach to weaning.6 Few units directly fund SLT services, however recommended level of staffing for SLTs in critical care has recently been set at 0.1 wte per bed to include direct involvement with clinical and strategic decisions as part of the wider MDT.3 This may help to support increased SLT involvement, as studies gather evidence of the impact of intubation on laryngeal function and post-extubation dysphagia24,25 and the value of early SLT intervention to improve outcomes. The high level of expertise that many SLTs have developed utilising FEES as a functional evaluation of the airway, have seen this tool add value to decision making for secretion management and airway manipulation to support both ventilator and tracheostomy weaning, with measurable outcomes.21,26
A number of devices have been developed to maximise swallow interventions and provide either neuromuscular stimulation or biofeedback of the oropharyngeal structures. Surface EMG (sEMG) attached to the submental muscles, acts as an adjunct to therapy providing visual biofeedback to the range and strength of swallow movements.27 Functional improvements have been reported in other patient groups although more studies are needed.28 A pharyngeal electrical stimulation device has been trialled in a number of multisite randomised controlled trials and has shown evidence of reducing time to decannulation in stroke patients.29 In the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence have issued guidance for using transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults,30 as these are not routinely available to SLTs. The guidance permits the use of NMES for clinical management of stroke, but for other patient groups, it is for research use only, which may be of interest to ICU teams with SLT staffing wishing to evaluate these devices.
In summary, the skills and expertise of SLTs in the area of swallowing function, language and communication skills add great value to the existing multi-professional team in critical care. They already bring a range of assessments and interventions to enhance patient care, with opportunities for future development using advanced technologies.
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
- 1.Royal College of Speech and Langauge Therapists. About the Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists, 2018, https://www.rcslt.org/about-us (accessed 1 November 2018).
- 2.Marian T, Dünser M, Citerio G, et al. Are intensive care physicians aware of dysphagia? The MADICU survey results. Intens Care Med 2018; 44: 973–975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine (FICM) and The Intensive Care Society (ICS). Guidelines for the Provision of Intensive Care Services (GPICS) Version 2, 2018, https://www.ficm.ac.uk/sites/default/files/gpics_v2-public-consultation-draft-october-2018_0.pdf (accessed 1 December 2018).
- 4.UK National Tracheostomy Safety Project. National Tracheostomy Safety Manual, 2013, www.tracheostomy.org.uk (accessed 1 June 2014).
- 5.National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcomes and Death. On the Right Trach? A review of the care received by patients who underwent a tracheostomy, 2014, http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2014tc.html (accessed 20 June 2014).
- 6.Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists. Speech and Language Therapy in Adult Critical Care: Position paper, 2014, https://www.rcslt.org/members/publications/publications2/criticalcare_positionpaper_060114 (accessed 1 December 2014).
- 7.Royal College of Speech and Langauge Therapists. Tracheostomy Competency Framework, 2014, https://www.rcslt.org/members/publications/publications2/tracheostomy_competency_framework (accessed 25 February 2015).
- 8.Intensive Care Society and Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine. Allied Health Professionals: Critical Care Professional Development Framework, 2018, http://www.ics.ac.uk/ICS/Resources___AHP_Framework.aspx (accessed 27 November 2018).
- 9.Brodsky MB, Levy MJ, Jedlanek E, et al. Laryngeal injury and upper airway symptoms after oral endotracheal intubation with mechanical ventilation during critical care: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2018; 46: 2010–2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Rehabilitation after Critical Illness in Adults Quality Standard [QS158], 2017, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs158 (accessed 17 September 2017).
- 11.Karlsson V, Bergbom I, Forsberg A. The lived experience of adult intensive care patients who were conscious during mechanical ventilation: a phenomenological-hermeneutic study. Intens Crit Care Nurs 2012; 28: 6–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Menzel LK. Factors related to the emotional responses of intubated patients to being unable to speak. Heart Lung 1998; 27: 245–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Green S, Reivonen S, Rutter L-M, et al. Investigating speech and language impairments in delirium: a preliminary case-control study. PloS one 2018; 13: e0207527–e0207527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.McGrath B, Lynch J, Wilson M, et al. Above cuff vocalisation: a novel technique for communication in the ventilator-dependent tracheostomy patient. J Intens Care Soc 2015; 17: 19–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Logemann JA. Manual for the videofluorographic study of swallowing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, 1993, p. xv, 169; ill.; 128 cm. Spiral bound.
- 16.Langmore S. Endoscopic evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders, New York: Thieme, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dikeman K, Kazandjian MS. Communication and swallowing management of tracheostomized and ventilator dependent adults (dysphagia series), San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group Inc., 2002, pp. 384. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Logemann JA. Treatment of oral and pharyngeal dysphagia. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2008; 19: 803–816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Christensen M, Trapl M. Development of a modified swallowing screening tool to manage post-extubation dysphagia. Nurs Crit Care 2018; 23: 102–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.See KC, Peng SY, Phua J, et al. Nurse-performed screening for postextubation dysphagia: a retrospective cohort study in critically ill medical patients. Crit Care 2016; 20: 326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hales PA, Drinnan MJ, Wilson JA. The added value of fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in tracheostomy weaning. Clin Otolaryngol 2008; 33: 319–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cameron TS, McKinstry A, Burt SK, et al. Outcomes of patients with spinal cord injury before and after introduction of an interdisciplinary tracheostomy team. Crit Care Resusc 2009; 11: 14–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Segaran E. Returning to normal: the role of eating in recovery from a critical illness. BJNN 2006; 2: 141–148. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kim MJ, Park YH, Park YS, et al. Associations between prolonged intubation and developing post-extubation dysphagia and aspiration pneumonia in non-neurologic critically ill patients. Ann Rehabil Med 2015; 39: 763–771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Moraes DP, Sassi FC, Mangilli LD, et al. Clinical prognostic indicators of dysphagia following prolonged orotracheal intubation in ICU patients. Crit Care 2013; 17: R243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McRae J, Morgan S. Successful ventilator weaning in dysphagic spinal cord injured patients. J Oral Health Dent 2017; 1: A0015. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Crary MA, Carnaby GD, Groher ME, et al. Functional benefits of dysphagia therapy using adjunctive sEMG biofeedback. Dysphagia 2004; 19: 160–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Benfield JK, Everton LF, Bath PM, et al. Does therapy with biofeedback improve swallowing in adults with dysphagia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2019; 100: 551–561. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 29.Dziewas R, Stellato R, van der Tweel I, et al. Pharyngeal electrical stimulation for early decannulation in tracheotomised patients with neurogenic dysphagia after stroke (PHAST-TRAC): a prospective, single-blinded, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17: 849–859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Interventional procedure overview of transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults (IPG634). London: NICE. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg634/resources/transcutaneous-neuromuscular-electrical-stimulation-for-oropharyngeal-dysphagia-in-adults-pdf-1899874043109061 (2018, accessed 1 February 2019).