Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica logoLink to Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
. 1989 Dec 1;30(4):475–481. doi: 10.1186/BF03548025

Potential of Differential Somatic Cell Counts as Indicators of Mastitis in Quarter Milk Samples from Dairy Cows

Ulf Emanuelson 115,215,✉, Paul Wever 115,215
PMCID: PMC8142181  PMID: 2640785

Abstract

Bacteriological status, somatic cell counts and proportions of lymphocytes, granulocytes and monocytes were determined in 1,659 quarter milk samples from 39 dairy cows. Discriminant analysis was performed in order to assess the ability of total and differential somatic cell counts and combinations of total somatic cell count and each of the differential cell counts, to discriminate between infected and pathogen-free quarters, as well as between quarters infected with minor pathogens and quarters infected with major pathogens. Total somatic cell count classified 82.9% of all quarters correctly with respect to bacteriological status. Differential somatic cell count was less effective than total somatic cell count in discriminating between infected and pathogen-free quarters, as well as between quarters infected with minor vs. major pathogens. Combination of total and differential somatic cell counts did not improve the rate of correctly classified quarters. Inclusion of demographic data into the discriminant function increased the number of quarters correctly classified, mainly through an increase in the proportion of correctly classified infected quarters.

Keywords: discriminant analysis, bacteriology, leukocyte, bovine mastitis

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

References

  1. Blackburn PS, Laing CM, Malcolm DF. A comparison of the diagnostic value of the total and differential cell counts in bovine milk. J. Dairy Sci. 1955;22:36–42. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dohoo IR, Meek AH, Martin SW, Barnum DA. Use of total and differential somatic cell counts from composite milk samples to detect mastitis in individual cows. Cand. J. comp. Med. 1981;45:8–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dulin AM, Paape MJ, Weinland BT. Effect of parity, stage of lactation, and intramammary infection on concentration of somatic cells and cytoplasmic particles in goat milk. J. Dairy Sci. 1983;66:2426–2433. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(83)82101-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Emanuelson U, Olsson T, Holmberg O, Hageltorn M, Matilia T, Nelson L, Àstrôm G. Comparison of some screening tests for detecting mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 1987;70:880–887. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80087-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Emanuelson U, Olsson T, Mattila T, Àstrôm G, Holmberg O. Effects of parity and stage of lactation on adenosine triphosphate, somatic cell counts and anti trypsin content in cow’s milk. J. Dairy Res. 1988;55:49–55. doi: 10.1017/S002202990002584X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fernando RS, Rindsig RB, Spahr SL. Electrical conductivity of milk for detecting mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 1982;65:659–664. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82245-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fox LK, Shook GE, Schultz LH. Factors related to milk loss in quarters with low somatic cell counts. J. Dairy Sci. 1985;68:2100–2107. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)81074-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hageltorn M, Saad AM. Flow cytofluorometric characterization of bovine blood and milk leukocytes. Amer. J. vet. Res. 1986;47:2012–2016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heuven HCM. Thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Ph. D. Madison, WI, USA: University of Wisconsin; 1987. Diagnostic and genetic analysis of mastitis field dáta. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoare RJT, Sheldrake PJN, McGregor GD, Woodhouse EW. Somatic cell volume distribution as an aid to the diagnosis of mastitis. J. Dairy Res. 1980;47:167–176. doi: 10.1017/S0022029900021038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Honkanen-Buzalski T, Sandholm M. Trypsin-inhibitors in mastitic milk and colostrum: correlation between trypsin-inhibitor capacity, bovine serum albumin and somatic cell contents. J. Dairy Res. 1981;45:213–223. doi: 10.1017/S0022029900021634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jain NC. Neutrophil leucocytes and inflamation of the bovine mammary gland. Theriogenology. 1976;6:153–173. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(76)90011-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jain NC, Schalm DW, Lasmanis J. Experimentally induced coliform (Aerobacter aerogenes) mastitis in normal cows and cows made neutrophenic by an equine anti-bovine leucocyte serum. Amer. J. vet. Res. 1971;32:1929–1935. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kennedy BW, Sethar MS, Tong AKW, Moxley JE, Downey BR. Environmental factors influencing test-day somatic cell counts in Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 1982;65:275–280. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82188-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee C, Wooding FBP, Kemp P. Identification, properties and differential counts of cell populations using electron microscopy of dry cows secretions, colostrum and milk from normal cows. J. Dairy Res. 1980;47:39–50. doi: 10.1017/S0022029900020860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McDonald JS, Anderson A J. Total and differential somatic cell counts in secretions from noninfected bovine mammary glands: The peripartum period. Amer. J. vet. Res. 1981;42:1366–1370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Meek AH, Barnum DA, Newbould FHS. Use of total and differential somatic cell counts to differentiate potentially infected from potentially non-infected quarters and cows and between herds of various levels of infection. J. Food Prot. 1980;43:10–14. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-43.1.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Newbould FHS. Effect of several factors on differential counting of somatic cells in farm bulk tank milk. J. Food Prot. 1978;41:96–99. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-41.2.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Paape MJ, Wer g A J, Guidry A J, Pearson RE. Leucocytes - second line of defence against invading mastitis pathogens. J. Dairy Sci. 1979;62:135–153. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(79)83215-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Renner E: Investigations on some parameters of the milk for detection of subclinical mastitis. Proceedings of Seminar on Mastitis Control, 1975, IDF Bulletin 85.
  21. SAS Institute Inc. SAS user’s guide: Statistics. Cary, N.C., USA: SAS Institute Inc.; 1985. The DISCRIM procedure. [Google Scholar]
  22. Schulze WD, Bramley AJ. Effect of Escherichia coli endotoxin-mediated inflammation of one mammary quarter of the bovine udder on diapedesis into other quarters. J. Dairy Res. 1982;49:381–385. doi: 10.1017/S0022029900022524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sheldrake RF, Hoare RJT, Woodhouse VE, McGregor GD. Cell volume to aid analysis and technique of somatic cell counts in milk. J. Dairy Sci. 1977;60:882–888. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(77)83958-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sheldrake RF, McGregor GD, Hoare RJT. Somatic cell count, electrical conductivity, and serum albumin concentration for detecting bovine mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 1983;66:548–555. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(83)81824-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sheldrake RF, Hoare RJT, McGregor GD. Lactation stage, parity, and infection affecting somatic cell counts, electrical conductivity and serum albumin in milk. J. Dairy Sci. 1983;66:542–547. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(83)81823-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wever P, Emanuelson U. Effects of systematic influences and intramammary infection on differential and total somatic cell counts in quarter milk samples from dairy cows. Acta vet. scand. 1989;30:465–474. doi: 10.1186/BF03548024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES