Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2021 Apr 16;143(16):6257–6265. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c02103

Mediator-Enabled Electrocatalysis with Ligandless Copper for Anaerobic Chan–Lam Coupling Reactions

Benjamin R Walker 1,#, Shuhei Manabe 2,#, Andrew T Brusoe 3, Christo S Sevov 4
PMCID: PMC8143265  NIHMSID: NIHMS1699696  PMID: 33861580

Abstract

Simple copper salts serve as catalysts to effect C–X bond-forming reactions in some of the most utilized transformations in synthesis, including the oxidative coupling of aryl boronic acids and amines. However, these Chan–Lam coupling reactions have historically relied on chemical oxidants that limit their applicability beyond small-scale synthesis. Despite the success of replacing strong chemical oxidants with electrochemistry for a variety of metal-catalyzed processes, electrooxidative reactions with ligandless copper catalysts are plagued by slow electron-transfer kinetics, irreversible copper plating, and competitive substrate oxidation. Herein, we report the implementation of substoichiometric quantities of redox mediators to address limitations to Cu-catalyzed electrosynthesis. Mechanistic studies reveal that mediators serve multiple roles by (i) rapidly oxidizing low-valent Cu intermediates, (ii) stripping Cu metal from the cathode to regenerate the catalyst and reveal the active Pt surface for proton reduction, and (iii) providing anodic overcharge protection to prevent substrate oxidation. This strategy is applied to Chan–Lam coupling of aryl-, heteroaryl-, and alkylamines with arylboronic acids in the absence of chemical oxidants. Couplings under these electrochemical conditions occur with higher yields and shorter reaction times than conventional reactions in air and provide complementary substrate reactivity.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1699696-f0008.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Reactions that form challenging C–X bonds, including C–N, C–F, C–O, and C–CF3, are critically important for the discovery and design of drug-related molecules.1,2 These coupling reactions have long relied on the judicious design of ligands that accelerate rates of reductive elimination from organometallic intermediates.39 Recent approaches leverage the reactivity of high-valent organometallic complexes bearing inexpensive ligands to effect similar reactions.1014 However, accessing these high-valent organometallic complexes typically requires oxidation with superstoichiometric quantities of peroxides,15,16 N-fluoropyridiniums,12,1719 xenon difluoride,20,21 silver salts,22 hypervalent iodide,23 or pressurized oxygen.24,25 Efforts to mitigate the hazards and wastes associated with strong chemical oxidants have focused on new strategies for electron transfer (ET) and oxidation, including photoredox catalysis2630 and electrosynthesis.3140 Electrochemistry is particularly well-suited for net oxidative (or reductive) organic transformations because reactions can be designed for the anode while providing a benign reagent, like a proton, for consumption at the opposite electrode. In doing so, electrical energy and a proton can replace energetic chemical oxidants.41

These advantages have motivated the recent development of a wide range of catalytic electrooxidative methodologies that employ complexes of Co,42,43 Fe,44, Ni,45,46 Ru,47 Mn,4850 Rh,51 Ir,52 Cu,5358 and Pd.59 However, catalysts for all of these reactions are metal complexes with strongly chelating ligands. While such ligands serve to modulate redox potentials, improve ET kinetics, and inhibit metal aggregation, some of the most common oxidative transformations such as Pd-catalyzed C–H oxygenation or Cu-catalyzed coupling require “ligandless” metal halides or acetates as catalysts.6072 Replacing prohibitive chemical oxidants in these transformations through electrooxidation remains an unmet goal because ligandless metal salts can undergo competing reduction and plating at the cathode (Figure 1a).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(a) Challenges associated with electrooxidative, ligandless transformations. (b) Redox mediator-enabled ligandless copper Chan–Lam coupling (this work).

Separation of the anodic reaction from the cathodic reaction with a divided cell is one strategy for protecting the homogeneous catalyst. While the use of divided cells poses some limitations to the general synthetic community, the approach has been successfully applied to electrooxidative Wacker73,74 or C–H acetoxylation7577 reactions catalyzed by simple Pd(OAc)2 salts. Copper salts can similarly be confined to an anodic chamber to protect from reductive plating but have very poor kinetics for electrooxidation, allowing for competitive oxidation of substrates. Because of these combined challenges, there are no examples of electrochemical reactions catalyzed by simple Cu salts in the absence of added chemical oxidants.

This work details the development of electrooxidative C–N coupling reactions in an undivided cell with simple Cu salts as catalyst and a redox mediator that serves to (i) oxidize CuI to the active CuII form, (ii) strip plated Cu0 to regenerate the homogeneous Cu catalyst, and (iii) protect substrates from oxidation. This general approach for protecting ligandless metal catalysts with a mediator is successfully applied to the Chan–Lam cross-coupling of (hetero)aryl or alkyl amines with aryl boronic acids (Figure 1b). The electrochemical reactions are scalable and typically occur with higher rates than the conventional reactions under air. The battery-inspired mediator is critically important, as electrochemical reactions in its absence fail to generate product even in a divided cell.

Previous efforts to replace chemical oxidants with alternative redox mechanisms have addressed some but not all of the listed challenges. Chan–Lam coupling has been reported using photoredox cocatalysts78 or electrochemical systems with Cu electrodes as both the anode and cathode to sustain the homogeneous catalyst by continuously stripping Cu metal.55,56 However, all reported systems rely on molecular oxygen and are low-yielding in the absence of exogenous oxidants.

Application of a mediator-assisted strategy toward the development of an electrochemical Chan–Lam coupling reaction addresses the long-standing challenge of eliminating oxygen or peroxide additives from this important transformation.61,6567,79,80 The requirement for hazardous oxidants has precluded the use of Chan–Lam couplings on a large scale, despite their ubiquitous application in drug discovery and small-scale synthesis.24,8184 The limited scale on which Chan–Lam reactions are currently performed is particularly frustrating because the reactions offer an easily accessible approach to forming important C–N bonds with an inexpensive copper salt as catalyst and abundant substrates. As such, this work represents not only a rare example of electrocatalysis with simple copper salts8587 in an undivided cell but also—to the best of our knowledge—the first example of Chan–Lam coupling to forge C–N bonds in the absence of a stoichiometric oxidant.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The importance of the Chan–Lam coupling reaction in organic synthesis has motivated detailed mechanistic studies that guided our reaction design.80,8890 Previous reports implicate a bimolecular disproportionation of CuII as a critical step to forming a putative CuIII intermediate that undergoes bond-forming C–N reductive elimination. As such, we sought to establish an electrochemical system that could maintain high concentrations of CuII without molecular oxygen or other chemical oxidants. We envisioned three challenges that would have to be addressed. First, CuII is easily reduced at an onset of −0.8 V (vs Fc/Fc+) and outcompetes the desired cathodic reaction of proton reduction in nonaqueous solvents (Figure 2a). The resulting CuI species can be further reduced to plate Cu0 at the cathode or can undergo disproportionation with a second CuI species to generate Cu0 metal and CuII, which can be reduced further. Second, electrooxidation of ligandless CuI to the desired CuII species is kinetically slow.55 The cyclic voltammogram (CV) of Cu(OAc)2 reproduced in Figure 2a reveals a reduction of CuII but no subsequent reoxidation on the return scan (black trace). The only observed anodic peak is the result of Cu0 stripping that had plated on the electrode during the reductive sweep. Third, the slow and poorly defined oxidation of CuI allows competitive oxidation and degradation of the amine substrates (red trace).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(a) CV of Cu(OAc)2 (black, 20 mM) and aniline (red, 100 mM). (b) Targeted synergy of redox mediators and copper electrocatalysts. CV conditions: 0.1 M KPF6 in MeCN, 100 mV/s scan rate, room temperature, glassy carbon working electrode (WE) and Pt counter electrode (CE).

These limitations directed our evaluation of redox-active compounds that can assist electrochemically slow redox processes of simple metal salts. Recently, redox mediators have come to the forefront of electrocatalysis as a means to mediate homogeneous ET, most commonly with an organic substrate.9195 Indirect redox of organic substrates does not rely on ET directly at a heterogeneous surface, which often leads to degradation. In analogy to these strategies, we hypothesized that mediators could be employed to promote the redox processes of a Cu catalyst, which similarly suffers from problematic ET reactions at heterogeneous surfaces. With properly tuned redox potentials and ET kinetics, the mediator can undergo rapid oxidation at the anode and (i) homogeneously oxidize CuI to CuII, (ii) oxidatively strip plated Cu0 to regenerate catalyst, and (iii) protect amine substrates from oxidative degradation (Figure 2b).

Redox Mediator Design.

We first evaluated a wide range of conditions that are commonly employed for Cu-catalyzed Chan–Lam coupling reactions but in an inert atmosphere and without a redox mediator (Figure 3). As expected, electrolysis of these solutions in both undivided and divided cells resulted in trace yields (<5%). Our experience merging battery chemistries with electrosynthesis for overcharge protection and redox shuttling further guided the reaction design.41 Specifically, Chan–Lam reactions were conducted with redox shuttles that undergo oxidation between −0.6 and +0.2 V (vs Fc/Fc+). Mediators with potentials in this range can readily oxidize CuI and Cu0 (E1/2 < −0.8 V) but are too mild to oxidize amine substrates (E1/2 > +0.5 V).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Evaluation of ferrocenyl mediators for the electrocatalytic reaction. Yields were determined by calibrated GC analysis with dodecane as an internal standard.

Mediator-assisted couplings were conducted with 20 mol % of the mediator. Of the tested additives (see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information for a complete list of evaluated mediators), only ferrocene-based mediators were compatible with the reaction conditions. Reactions with ferrocene (Fc) as a mediator dramatically improved product yields (47%) compared to any nonmediated electrolysis reaction. Similar or better yields were obtained from reactions conducted with less-oxidizing mediators (Fc-1 through Fc-3) with potentials between 0 and −0.15 V (vs Fc/Fc+). However, the benefit of the mediator was lost when the redox potential of the ferrocenyl derivative was lowered to more negative potentials (Fc-4). Low yields observed from reactions with the weak oxidant Fc-4 likely stem from the mediator’s inability to readily oxidize CuI. Reactions with mediators that are more oxidizing than Fc (Fc-5 through Fc-8) occurred with complete consumption of the aniline but low yields. These results suggest that mediators with potentials above +0.1 V (vs Fc/Fc+) allow for competitive oxidation of the aniline (Eonset = 0.4 V).

Despite these promising yields, reactions with ferrocene failed to reach full conversion regardless of the electron equivalents added, which suggests that degenerate redox shuttling occurs between the electrodes. Rather than relying on electrochemistry to generate significant quantities of the oxidized mediator, we instead employed the preoxidized mediator as the starting material. Reactions with 20 mol % ferrocenium hexafluorophosphate (Fc+) occurred with complete conversion, and the coupled product was isolated in 81% yield. Reactions with oxidized forms of mediators Fc-1 through Fc-3 similarly formed coupled products in high yields, but the unfunctionalized Fc+ was selected as the reaction mediator because of its commercial availability, ease of handling, and synthetic accessibility.

Reaction Development.

With the standard conditions summarized in Table 1, arylamine products could be prepared in high yields with an inexpensive mediator and catalyst in just 5 h under air-free conditions and constant current electrolysis in an undivided cell (entry 1). Control experiments reveal that Fc+, Et3N, NaOAc, Cu(OAc)2, and electrochemistry are all required for products to be formed under nitrogen (entries 2–6). While reactions can be performed with a variety of anodic materials (entries 7 and 8), reactions with Pt cathodes were the highest yielding. The observed improvement likely stems from decreased overpotentials for proton reduction at Pt compared to reduction at alternative cathodic materials.96100

Table 1.

Reaction Developmenta,b

graphic file with name nihms-1699696-t0009.jpg

While the transformation is reported under inert conditions to highlight the use of electrochemistry as the means for oxidative turnover, reaction setup and electrolysis can be performed in air (entry 9). The slightly lower yield likely stems from degenerate redox events in the presence of air. An added benefit to the electrochemical reaction is the decreased reaction time compared to conventional reactions in air. Reactions in air without both electrochemistry and mediator formed products in just 8% yield (entry 10). Surprisingly, the mediator proved beneficial to even the nonelectrochemical reactions where yields were improved from 8% to 34% in the same timeframe (entry 11). Collectively, these results highlight the importance of both electrochemistry and redox mediators for Cu-catalyzed Chan–Lam reactions.

Substrate Scope.

The developed methodology was applied to couplings of aryl-, heteroaryl-, and alkylamines with arylboronic acids (Chart 1). Coupled products were isolated in good yields following electrooxidative reactions under inert conditions for arylamines with both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents. Steric hindrance ortho to nitrogen had little effect on product yields (57). Electron-rich alkylamines that were susceptible to oxidative degradation underwent coupling but were more sensitive to the steric environment around nitrogen. While products of reactions with primary amines were isolated in good yields, yields from reactions with secondary amines were lower (14 and 15 vs 18 and 19). A similar effect was observed with hindered primary amines such as the valine derivative (17) that underwent coupling in reduced yields. No racemization was observed for this amino acid derivative as well as for the enantiopure benzylamine 16 under the mild reaction conditions. Coupling reactions of heteroarylamines occurred with lower conversion than with arylamines, but acceptable yields of products could be isolated (2022). The lower reactivity likely stemmed from competing coordination to the Cu catalyst, but yields could be improved with longer electrolysis to pass additional Faradaic equivalents. Finally, the standard reaction could be easily scaled 100-fold using a media bottle as the undivided electrochemical cell. Under air-free conditions, compound 3 was formed as a single product in over 85% GC yield and was isolated in 72% yield (3.7 g).

Chart 1. Substrate Scopeh.

Chart 1.

aUnder air, no electrochemistry. bUnder air, without Fc+, no electrochemistry. c40 °C. dReaction was performed at double the concentration. eReaction was performed at triple the concentration. fWithout NEt3. gFcMe2 was used instead of Fc+. Minor variations to the applied current or electron equivalents for specific substrates are detailed in the Supporting Information. hThe reported yields are isolated yields from reactions of 0.30 mmol of amine and 0.45 mmol of boronic acid.

We next evaluated the scope in arylboronic acid under the anaerobic electrochemical conditions. Unlike reactions conducted with oxygen, no oxygenation or dimerization of the boronic acid was observed, and reactions generally form the target compound as a single product.66,101 Classically, Chan–Lam reactions are the highest yielding with electron-rich arylboronic acids and are more challenging with electron-deficient substrates.67,102 The opposite trend in reactivity was observed with this electrochemical methodology. Substrates with electron-withdrawing groups were coupled in the highest yields (3133), while couplings of substrates with strongly donating groups para to the boronic acid were more challenging (26). Reactions reverted to the expected reactivity patterns when Chan–Lam coupling was performed under conventional conditions without electrochemistry. As an example, the low-yielding electrochemical reaction of electron-rich 26 (31%) improved to 72% when in air with Fc+. In contrast, electrochemistry was essential for coupling of the electron-deficient substrate to form 33 (88% yield vs 15% in air and Fc+).

The investigation of the reaction scope reveals that the developed protocol is not simply an air-free alternative to Chan–Lam coupling reactions. Rather, this methodology provides complementary reactivity for reactions of challenging substrates that have previously been low yielding.67,102 Additionally, electrochemical reactions are higher yielding than those performed in air alone. Finally, these studies reveal that the mediator has a beneficial impact on yields of nonelectrochemical reactions performed in air (see examples 3, 14, 20, 26, and 28).

Role of the Mediator.

The dramatic impact of the redox mediator on the success of the electrochemical Chan–Lam reaction inspired mechanistic studies that could provide insights for the design and implementation of mediators in other challenging electrocatalytic methodologies. We first evaluated the role of Fc+ in homogeneous oxidation of low-valent Cu salts to regenerate the active CuII species. CVs of CuI(OAc)—the Cu species generated after C–N bond formation—scanned from 0 to −1.7 V revealed a single reduction event with a peak current at −1.5 V (Figure 4, red trace). This current response is consistent with CuI/0 reduction. The only oxidation event on the return scan to 0 V was the stripping of plated Cu0 indicated by the non-Nernstian peak centered at −0.45 V. Notably, there is no second redox event that can be attributed to oxidation of CuI. Additional evidence that CuI is not electrochemically oxidized was provided by analysis of the baseline current on the initial reductive sweep of the CuI-containing solution. Specifically, CuI should be unstable at the starting potential of the CV sweep (+0 V), and a positive baseline current would be observed for electrochemical oxidation of the bulk CuI species in solution. Additionally, any CuII that was generated at these high potentials would be reduced at the CuII/I couple with an onset of −0.8 V. However, no current was observed at either of these potential ranges, supporting a lack of electrochemical activity for the CuI salt under the reaction conditions.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

CVs probing Cu(I) oxidation by Fc+ with Cu(OAc) (red), Cu(OAc) with Fc+ (black), and Fc+ (blue). CV conditions: 20 mM in MeCN with 0.1 M KPF6 as electrolyte and 100 mV/s scan rate at room temperature using glassy carbon WE and Pt CE. Potentials were calibrated with Fc as an internal reference.

CV scans after the addition of 1 equiv of Fc+ to the same solution of CuI(OAc) (Figure 4, black) matched those of CuII(OAc)2 and revealed a CuII/I reduction that was not observed from CVs of CuI alone. Additionally, the baseline current above the potential of the Fc/Fc+ was positive, which indicates that the added Fc+ mediator was reduced to Fc and was undergoing oxidation at high potentials. For comparison, no oxidation was observed at high potentials in CVs of pure Fc+ (blue trace). Together, these data revealed that Fc+ rapidly oxidizes CuI to CuII under the reaction conditions.

We next analyzed deposits on the cathodes from reactions with and without added mediator. Visually, Pt cathodes from high-yielding reactions containing Fc+ appeared unchanged from before electrolysis (Figure 5a). In contrast, an even coating of metallic copper was visible on cathodes from reactions performed without Fc+ (Figure 5b). Elemental analysis by scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-rays (EDX-SEM) of these cathodic surfaces confirmed the visual observations and underscored the dramatic impact of the mediator on maintaining a homogeneous catalyst. Images reproduced in Figure 5 reveal either a pristine Pt surface from reactions with added Fc+ or complete surface coverage by Cu0 in the absence of the mediator. Coating of the Pt surface only further diminishes the selectivity for the desired proton-reduction reaction over Cu plating. Finally, we demonstrated that plated cathodes were stripped of Cu deposits within seconds of submerging the electrodes in a solution of Fc+. CVs of the resulting solution were consistent with the conversion of Fc+ to Fc and the concomitant formation of CuII (Figure S2 in the Supporting Information). Catalyst recovery by oxidative stripping represents degenerate redox events: electrochemical Cu plating paired with Fc oxidation followed by back-electron transfer during the oxidative stripping of Cu0 with Fc+. It is for this reason that reactions require 4 electron equiv instead of the theoretical 2 F/mol for high yields. However, electrolysis beyond the theoretical capacity does not irreversibly waste electrons because the electrons are simply shuttled through the degenerate pathway for catalyst recovery.41 Together, these data implicate the mediator’s role in stripping Cu metal deposits from the cathode to maintain an active Pt surface for proton reduction and to regenerate catalytic CuII salts.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

(a) Photo and EDX-SEM image of Pt electrode from a reaction containing Fc+ showing elemental platinum in red. (b) Photo and EDX-SEM image of a Pt electrode from a reaction without Fc+ showing elemental copper in yellow.

Our final investigation into the function of the mediator targeted its role on preventing oxidation of amine substrates. Reactions without Fc+ form low yields of coupled product despite complete conversion of the amine substrate. In contrast, yields from reactions with the mediator closely mirror substrate conversion. To gain insight into the oxidative half-cell reactions, we performed mediated and unmediated Chan–Lam couplings with a Ag/Ag+ quasi-reference electrode to monitor the absolute operating potential of the anode (Figure 6a). Anodic reactions in solutions containing Fc+ occurred at +0.2 V (black trace), which is a potential consistent with oxidation of Fc (Figure 6b, black). In contrast, the anodic operating potential during unmediated reactions was +0.8 V (red trace). This high voltage is indicative of amine oxidation (Figure 6b, red) and provides a rational for the observed high conversions with low product yields under unmediated conditions.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

(a) Anodic voltage profile of a standard reaction with Fc+ (black) and a reaction without Fc+ (red). (b) CVs of anodic redox events of a standard reaction mixture (red) and of pure Fc+ (black). Conditions: 100 mM in MeCN with 0.1 M KPF6 as electrolyte and 100 mV/s scan rate at 60 °C using glassy carbon WE and Pt CE. Potentials calibrated to Fc as an internal standard.

CONCLUSION

In summary, this work details a strategy for performing electrocatalytic synthetic transformations with catalytic quantities of ligandless copper salts and ferrocenium as an ET shuttle. Mechanistic studies reveal that the mediator serves multiple key roles during electrolysis, including as (i) an electrochemically generated oxidant to maintain high CuII concentrations, (ii) a stripping agent to regenerate active Cu catalyst and reveal the active Pt surface for proton reduction, and (iii) an overcharge protector to preclude undesirable anodic reactions. This strategy is applied to Chan–Lam coupling reactions of aryl-, heteroaryl-, and alkylamines with arylboronic acids in the absence of chemical oxidants to form coupled products in higher yields and with shorter reaction times than conventional reactions in air alone. We anticipate that this mediator-assisted electrocatalysis will be applicable to a wide range of oxidative transformations that utilize inexpensive catalysts of metal salts that have slow ET kinetics or are susceptible to reductive plating.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the National Institutes of Health (NIH R35 GM138373) for financial support.

Footnotes

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.1c02103.

Experimental procedures, cell design, characterization of compounds, spectroscopic data, electrochemical data, and additional experiments (PDF)

Complete contact information is available at: https://pubs.acs.org/10.1021/jacs.1c02103

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Contributor Information

Benjamin R. Walker, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States

Shuhei Manabe, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.

Andrew T. Brusoe, Chemical Development, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, Connecticut 06877-0368, United States

Christo S. Sevov, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Roughley SD; Jordan AM The Medicinal Chemis’s Toolbox: An Analysis of Reactions Used in the Pursuit of Drug Candidates. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54 (10), 3451–3479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Schneider N; Lowe DM; Sayle RA; Tarselli MA; Landrum GA Big Data from Pharmaceutical Patents: A Computational Analysis of Medicinal Chemists Bread and Butter. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59 (9), 4385–4402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Fujita KI; Yamashita M; Puschmann F; Alvarez-Falcon MM; Incarvito CD; Hartwig JF Organometallic Chemistry of Amidate Complexes. Accelerating Effect of Bidentate Ligands on the Reductive Elimination of N-Aryl Amidates from Palladium(II). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128 (28), 9044–9045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Furuya T; Benitez D; Tkatchouk E; Strom AE; Tang P; Goddard WA; Ritter T Mechanism of C-F Reductive Elimination from Palladium(IV) Fluorides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (11), 3793–3807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Driver MS; Hartwig JF Carbon-Nitrogen-Bond-Forming Reductive Elimination of Arylamines from Palladium(II) Phosphine Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119 (35), 8232–8245. [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Surry DS; Buchwald SL Biaryl Phosphane Ligands in Palladium-Catalyzed Amination. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47 (34), 6338–6361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Martin R; Buchwald SL Palladium-Catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling Reactions Employing Dialkylbiaryl Phosphine Ligands. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41 (11), 1461–1473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Hartwig JF Evolution of a Fourth Generation Catalyst for the Amination and Thioetherification of Aryl Halides. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41 (11), 1534–1544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Hartwig JF Carbon - Heteroatom Bond-Forming Reductive Eliminations of Amines, Ethers, and Sulfides. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31 (12), 852–860. [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Roberts CC; Camasso NM; Bowes EG; Sanford MS Impact of Oxidation State on Reactivity and Selectivity Differences between Nickel(III) and Nickel(IV) Alkyl Complexes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58 (27), 9104–9108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).D’Accriscio F; Borja P; Saffon-Merceron N; Fustier-Boutignon M; Mezailles N; Nebra N C-H Bond Trifluoromethylation of Arenes Enabled by a Robust, High-Valent Nickel(IV) Complex. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56 (42), 12898–12902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Ball ND; Kampf JW; Sanford MS Aryl-CF3 Bond-Forming Reductive Elimination from Palladium(IV). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (9), 2878–2879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Le Vaillant F; Reijerse EJ; Leutzsch M; Cornelia J Dialkyl Ether Formation at High-Valent Nickel. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (46), 19540–19550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).McCann SD; Stahl SS Copper-Catalyzed Aerobic Oxidations of Organic Molecules: Pathways for Two-Electron Oxidation with a Four-Electron Oxidant and a One-Electron Redox-Active Catalyst. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48 (6), 1756–1766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Tran BL; Li B; Driess M; Hartwig JF Copper-Catalyzed Intermolecular Amidation and Imidation of Unactivated Alkanes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (6), 2555–2563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Sueki S; Kuninobu Y Copper-Catalyzed N- and O-Alkylation of Amines and Phenols Using Alkylborane Reagents. Org. Lett. 2013, 15 (7), 1544–1547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Roberts CC; Chong E; Kampf JW; Canty AJ; Ariafard A; Sanford MS Nickel(II/IV) Manifold Enables Roomerature C(Sp3)-H Functionalization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (49), 19513–19520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Fier PS; Luo J; Hartwig JF Copper-Mediated Fluorination of Arylboronate Esters. Identification of a Copper(III) Fluoride Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135 (7), 2552–2559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Chen YQ; Singh S; Wu Y; Wang Z; Hao W; Verma P; Qiao JX; Sunoj RB; Yu JQ Pd-Catalyzed γ-C(Sp3)-H Fluorination of Free Amines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (22), 9966–9974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Kaspi AW; Yahav-Levi A; Goldberg I; Vigalok A Xenon Difluoride Induced Aryl Iodide Reductive Elimination: A Simple Access to Difluoropalladium(II) Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47 (1), 5–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Zhao SB; Becker JJ; Gagné MR Steric Crowding Makes Challenging Csp3 - F Reductive Eliminations Feasible. Organometallics 2011, 30 (15), 3926–3929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Roy P; Bour JR; Kampf JW; Sanford MS Catalytically Relevant Intermediates in the Ni-Catalyzed C(Sp2)-H and C(Sp3)-H Functionalization of Aminoquinoline Substrates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (43), 17382–17387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Meucci EA; Camasso NM; Sanford MS An Organometalllic NiIV Complex That Participates in Competing Transmetalation and C(Sp2)-O Bond-Forming Reductive Elimination Reactions. Organometallics 2017, 36 (2), 247–250. [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Campbell Brewer A; Hoffman PC; Martinelli JR; Kobierski ME; Mullane N; Robbins D Development and Scale-Up of a Continuous Aerobic Oxidative Chan-Lam Coupling. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2019, 23 (8), 1484–1498. [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Mallia CJ; Burton PM; Smith AMR; Walter GC; Baxendale IR Catalytic Chan–Lam Coupling Using a ‘Tube-in-Tube’ Reactor to Deliver Molecular Oxygen as an Oxidant. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 1598–1607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Jiang H; Studer A Iminyl-Radicals by Oxidation of α-Imino-Oxy Acids: Photoredox-Neutral Alkene Carboimination for the Synthesis of Pyrrolines. Angew. Chem. 2017, 129 (40), 12441–12444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Bloom S; Liu C; Kölmel DK; Qiao JX; Zhang Y; Poss MA; Ewing WR; Macmillan DWC. Decarboxylative Alkylation for Site-Selective Bioconjugation of Native Proteins via Oxidation Potentials. Nat. Chem. 2018, 10 (2), 205–211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Beatty JW; Stephenson CRJ Amine Functionalization via Oxidative Photoredox Catalysis: Methodology Development and Complex Molecule Synthesis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48 (5), 1474–1484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Prier CK; Rankic DA; MacMillan DWC Visible Light Photoredox Catalysis with Transition Metal Complexes: Applications in Organic Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113 (7), 5322–5363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Skubi KL; Blum TR; Yoon TP Dual Catalysis Strategies in Photochemical Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116 (17), 1003510074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Bour JR; Roy P; Canty AJ; Kampf JW; Sanford MS Oxidatively Induced Aryl-CF3 Coupling at Diphosphine Nickel Complexes. Organometallics 2020, 39 (1), 3–7. [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Yan M; Kawamata Y; Baran PS Synthetic Organic Electrochemical Methods since 2000: On the Verge of a Renaissance. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117 (21), 13230–13319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Weinberg NL; Weinberg HR Electrochemical Oxidation of Organic Compounds. Chem. Rev. 1968, 68 (4), 449–523. [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Jiao K-J; Xing Y-K; Yang Q-L; Qiu H; Mei T-S Site-Selective C–H Functionalization via Synergistic Use of Electrochemistry and Transition Metal Catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020, 53 (2), 300–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Yoshida JI; Kataoka K; Horcajada R; Nagaki A Modern Strategies in Electroorganic Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108 (7), 2265–2299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Gandeepan P; Finger LH; Meyer TH; Ackermann L 3D Metallaelectrocatalysis for Resource Economical Syntheses. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49 (13), 4254–4272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Siu JC; Fu N; Lin S Catalyzing Electrosynthesis: A Homogeneous Electrocatalytic Approach to Reaction Discovery. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020, 53 (3), 547–560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Kärkäs MD Electrochemical Strategies for C–H Functionalization and C–N Bond Formation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47 (15), 5786–5865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Moeller KD Using Physical Organic Chemistry to Shape the Course of Electrochemical Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118 (9), 4817–4833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Kingston C; Palkowitz MD; Takahira Y; Vantourout JC; Peters BK; Kawamata Y; Baran PS A Survival Guide for the “Electro-Curious. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020, 53 (1), 72–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Truesdell BL; Hamby TB; Sevov CS General C(Sp2)-C(Sp3) Cross-Electrophile Coupling Reactions Enabled by Overcharge Protection of Homogeneous Electrocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (12), 5884–5893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Moselage M; Li J; Ackermann L Cobalt-Catalyzed C-H Activation. ACS Catal. 2016, 6 (2), 498–525. [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Dhawa U; Tian C; Li W; Ackermann L Cobalta-Electrocatalyzed C-H Allylation with Unactivated Alkenes. ACS Catal. 2020, 10 (11), 6457–6462. [Google Scholar]
  • (44).Zhu C; Stangier M; Oliveira JCA; Massignan L; Ackermann L Iron-Electrocatalyzed C-H Arylations: Mechanistic Insights into Oxidation-Induced Reductive Elimination for Ferraelectrocatalysis. Chem. - Eur. J. 2019, 25 (71), 16382–16389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (45).Zhang SK; Samanta RC; Sauermann N; Ackermann L Nickel-Catalyzed Electrooxidative C-H Amination: Support for Nickel(IV). Chem. - Eur. J. 2018, 24 (72), 19166–19170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (46).Kawamata Y; Vantourout JC; Hickey DP; Bai P; Chen L; Hou Q; Qiao W; Barman K; Edwards MA; Garrido-Castro AF; Degruyter JN; Nakamura H; Knouse K; Qin C; Clay KJ; Bao D; Li C; Starr JT; Garcia-Irizarry C; Sach N; White HS; Neurock M; Minteer SD; Baran PS Electrochemically Driven, Ni-Catalyzed Aryl Amination: Scope, Mechanism, and Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (15), 6392–6402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (47).Yang L; Steinbock R; Scheremetjew A; Kuniyil R; Finger LH; Messinis AM; Ackermann L Azaruthena(II)-Bicyclo[3.2.0]-Heptadiene: Key Intermediate for Ruthenaelectro(II/III/I)-Catalyzed Alkyne Annulations. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59 (27), 11130–11135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (48).Ye K; Pombar G; Fu N; Sauer GS; Keresztes I; Lin S Anodically Coupled Electrolysis for the Heterodifunctionalization of Alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (7), 2438–2441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (49).Fu N; Sauer GS; Lin S Electrocatalytic Radical Dichlorination of Alkenes with Nucleophilic Chlorine Sources. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (43), 15548–15553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (50).Fu N; Sauer GS; Saha A; Loo A; Lin S Metal-Catalyzed Electrochemical Diazidation of Alkenes. Science 2017, 357 (6351), 575–579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (51).Wu ZJ; Su F; Lin W; Song J; Wen TB; Zhang HJ; Xu HC Scalable Rhodium(III)-Catalyzed Aryl C-H Phosphorylation Enabled by Anodic Oxidation Induced Reductive Elimination. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58 (47), 16770–16774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (52).Ye X; Wang C; Zhang S; Wei J; Shan C; Wojtas L; Xie Y; Shi X Facilitating Ir-Catalyzed C-H Alkynylation with Electrochemistry: Anodic Oxidation-Induced Reductive Elimination. ACS Catal. 2020, 10 (20), 11693–11699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (53).Tian C; Dhawa U; Scheremetjew A; Ackermann L Cupraelectro-Catalyzed Alkyne Annulation: Evidence for Distinct C—H Alkynylation and Decarboxylative C—H/C—C Manifolds. ACS Catal. 2019, 9 (9), 7690–7696. [Google Scholar]
  • (54).Yang QL; Wang XY; Lu JY; Zhang LP; Fang P; Mei TS Copper-Catalyzed Electrochemical C-H Amination of Arenes with Secondary Amines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (36), 11487— 11494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (55).Wexler RP; Nuhant P; Senter TJ; Gale-Day ZJ Electrochemically Enabled Chan-Lam Couplings of Aryl Boronic Acids and Anilines. Org. Lett. 2019, 21 (12), 4540–4543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (56).Qi HL; Chen DS; Ye JS; Huang JM Electrochemical Technique and Copper-Promoted Transformations: Selective Hydroxylation and Amination of Arylboronic Acids. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78 (15), 7482–7487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (57).Kathiravan S; Suriyanarayanan S; Nicholls IA Electrooxidative Amination of Sp 2 C-H Bonds: Coupling of Amines with Aryl Amides via Copper Catalysis. Org. Lett. 2019, 21 (7), 1968–1972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (58).Badalyan A; Stahl SS Cooperative Electrocatalytic Alcohol Oxidation with Electron-Proton-Transfer Mediators. Nature 2016, 535 (7612), 406–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (59).Lai YL; Huang JM Palladium-Catalyzed Electrochemical Allylic Alkylation between Alkyl and Allylic Halides in Aqueous Solution. Org. Lett. 2017, 19 (8), 2022–2025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (60).Neufeldt SR; Sanford MS Controlling Site Selectivity in Palladium-Catalyzed C-H Bond Functionalization. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45 (6), 936–946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (61).Chan DMT; Monaco KL; Wang RP; Winters MP New N- and O-Arylations with Phenylboronic Acids and Cupric Acetate. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39 (19), 2933–2936. [Google Scholar]
  • (62).Ley SV; Thomas AW Modern Synthetic Methods for Copper-Mediated C(Aryl)-O, C(Aryl)-N, and C(Aryl)-S Bond Formation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42 (44), 5400–5449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (63).Allen SE; Walvoord RR; Padilla-Salinas R; Kozlowski MC Aerobic Copper-Catalyzed Organic Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113 (8), 6234–6458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (64).Engle KM; Mei TS; Wasa M; Yu JQ Weak Coordination as a Powerful Means for Developing Broadly Useful C-H Functionalization Reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45 (6), 788–802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (65).Lam PYS; Clark CG; Saubern S; Adams J; Winters MP; Chan DMT; Combs A New Aryl/Heteroaryl C-N Bond Cross-Coupling Reactions via Arylboronic Acid/Cupric Acetate Arylation. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39 (19), 2941–2944. [Google Scholar]
  • (66).Evans DA; Katz JL; West TR Synthesis of Diaryl Ethers through the Copper-Promoted Arylation of Phenols with Arylboronic Acids. An Expedient Synthesis of Thyroxine. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39 (19), 2937–2940. [Google Scholar]
  • (67).West MJ; Fyfe JWB; Vantourout JC; Watson AJB Mechanistic Development and Recent Applications of the Chan–Lam Amination. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119 (24), 12491–12523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (68).Desai LV; Hull KL; Sanford MS Palladium-Catalyzed Oxygenation of Unactivated Sp3 C-H Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (31), 9542–9543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (69).Enthaler S; Company A Palladium-Catalysed Hydroxylation and Alkoxylation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40 (10), 4912–4924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (70).Vijayan A; Rao DN; Radhakrishnan KV; Lam PYS; Das P Advances in Carbon-Element Bond Construction under Chan-Lam Cross-Coupling Conditions: A Second Decade. Synthesis 2021, 53, 805–847. [Google Scholar]
  • (71).Sanjeeva Rao K; Wu TS Chan-Lam Coupling Reactions: Synthesis of Heterocycles. Tetrahedron 2012, 68 (38), 7735–7754. [Google Scholar]
  • (72).Collman JP; Zhong M An Efficient Diamine·copper Complex-Catalyzed Coupling of Arylboronic Acids with Imidazoles. Org. Lett. 2000, 2 (9), 1233–1236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (73).Mitsudo K; Ishii T; Tanaka H Pd/TEMPO Double-Mediatory Electrooxidative Wacker-Type Cyclizations. Electrochemistry 2008, 76 (12), 859–861. [Google Scholar]
  • (74).Tsuji J; Minato M Oxidation of Olefins to Ketones in Combination with Electrooxidation. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28 (32), 3683–3686. [Google Scholar]
  • (75).Yang QL; Li YQ; Ma C; Fang P; Zhang XJ; Mei TS Palladium-Catalyzed C(Sp3)-H Oxygenation via Electrochemical Oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (8), 3293–3298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (76).Shrestha A; Lee M; Dunn AL; Sanford MS Palladium-Catalyzed C-H Bond Acetoxylation via Electrochemical Oxidation. Org. Lett. 2018, 20 (1), 204–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (77).Ma C; Zhao CQ; Li YQ; Zhang LP; Xu XT; Zhang K; Mei TS Palladium-Catalyzed C-H Activation/C-C Cross-Coupling Reactions: Via Electrochemistry. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53 (90), 12189–12192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (78).Yoo WJ; Tsukamoto T; Kobayashi S Visible-Light-Mediated Chan-Lam Coupling Reactions of Aryl Boronic Acids and Aniline Derivatives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54 (22), 6587–6590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (79).West MJ; Fyfe JWB; Vantourout JC; Watson AJB Mechanistic Development and Recent Applications of the Chan–Lam Amination. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119 (24), 12491–12523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (80).Vantourout JC; Miras HN; Isidro-Llobet A; Sproules S; Watson AJB Spectroscopic Studies of the Chan-Lam Amination: A Mechanism-Inspired Solution to Boronic Ester Reactivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (13), 4769–4779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (81).Vantourout JC; Li L; Bendito-Moll E; Chabbra S; Arrington K; Bode BE; Isidro-Llobet A; Kowalski JA; Nilson MG; Wheelhouse KMP; Woodard JL; Xie S; Leitch DC; Watson AJB Mechanistic Insight Enables Practical, Scalable, Room Temperature Chan-Lam N-Arylation of N-Aryl Sulfonamides. ACS Catal. 2018, 8 (10), 9560–9566. [Google Scholar]
  • (82).Qiao JX; Lam PYS Recent Advances in Chan–Lam Coupling Reaction: Copper-Promoted C–-Heteroatom Bond Cross-Coupling Reactions with Boronic Acids and Derivatives. In Boronic Acids; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2011; Vol. 1, pp 315–361. [Google Scholar]
  • (83).Osterberg PM; Niemeier JK; Welch CJ; Hawkins JM; Martinelli JR; Johnson TE; Root TW; Stahl SS Experimental Limiting Oxygen Concentrations for Nine Organic Solvents at Temperatures and Pressures Relevant to Aerobic Oxidations in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2015, 19 (11), 1537–1543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (84).Caron S; Dugger RW; Ruggeri SG; Ragan JA; Brown Ripin DH Large-Scale Oxidations in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106 (7), 2943–2989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (85).Bartels J; Lu P; Maurer K; Walker AV; Moeller KD Site-Selectively Functionalizing Microelectrode Arrays: The Use of Cu(I)-Catalysts. Langmuir 2011, 27 (17), 11199–11205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (86).Graaf MD; Moeller KD Chemoselectivity and the Chan-Lam Coupling Reaction: Adding Amino Acids to Polymer-Coated Microelectrode Arrays. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81 (4), 1527–1534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (87).Wang F; Gerken JB; Bates DM; Kim YJ; Stahl SS Electrochemical Strategy for Hydrazine Synthesis: Development and Overpotential Analysis of Methods for Oxidative N—N Coupling of an Ammonia Surrogate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (28), 12349–12356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (88).King AE; Ryland BL; Brunold TC; Stahl SS Kinetic and Spectroscopic Studies of Aerobic Copper(II)-Catalyzed Methoxylation of Arylboronic Esters and Insights into Aryl Transmetalation to Copper(II). Organometallics 2012, 31 (22), 7948–7957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (89).King AE; Brunold TC; Stahl SS Mechanistic Study of Copper-Catalyzed Aerobic Oxidative Coupling of Arylboronic Esters and Methanol: Insights into an Organometallic Oxidase Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131 (14), 5044–5045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (90).Kundu S; Greene C; Williams KD; Salvador TK; Bertke JA; Cundari TR; Warren TH. Three-Coordinate Copper(II) Aryls: Key Intermediates in C-O Bond Formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (27), 9112–9115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (91).Francke R; Little RD. Redox Catalysis in Organic Electrosynthesis: Basic Principles and Recent Developments. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43 (8), 2492–2521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (92).Little RD A Perspective on Organic Electrochemistry. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85 (21), 13375–13390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (93).Francke R; Gonzalez L; Little RD.; Moeller KD. Electrons, Electrodes, and the Transformation of Organic Molecules. In Surface and Interface Science; Wiley: 2020; pp 827–891. [Google Scholar]
  • (94).Steckhan E Organic Syntheses with Electrochemically Regenerable Redox Systems. Top. Curr. Chem. 1987, 142, 1–69. [Google Scholar]
  • (95).Steckhan E Organic Syntheses with Electrochemically Regenerable Redox Systems. Top. Curr. Chem. 1987, 142, 1–69. [Google Scholar]
  • (96).Zhang S; Yuan XZ; Hin JNC; Wang H; Friedrich KA; Schulze M A Review of Platinum-Based Catalyst Layer Degradation in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. J. Power Sources 2009, 194 (2), 588–600. [Google Scholar]
  • (97).Tran PD; Barber J Proton Reduction to Hydrogen in Biological and Chemical Systems. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14 (40), 13772–13784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (98).Zhao G; Rui K; Dou SX; Sun W Heterostructures for Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution Reaction: A Review. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28 (43), 1803291. [Google Scholar]
  • (99).Yin H; Zhao S; Zhao K; Muqsit A; Tang H; Chang L; Zhao H; Gao Y; Tang Z Ultrathin Platinum Nanowires Grown on Single-Layered Nickel Hydroxide with High Hydrogen Evolution Activity. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (100).Subbaraman R; Tripkovic D; Strmcnik D; Chang K-C; Uchimura M; Paulikas a P.; Stamenkovic V; Markovic NM. Enhancing Hydrogen Evolution Activity in Water Splitting by Tailoring Li+-Ni(OH)2-Pt Interfaces. Science 2011, 334 (6060), 1256–1260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (101).Quach TD; Batey RA Ligand- and Base-Free Copper(II)-Catalyzed C-N Bond Formation: Cross-Coupling Reactions of Organoboron Compounds with Aliphatic Amines and Anilines. Org. Lett. 2003, 5 (23), 4397–4400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (102).Hardouin Duparc V; Bano GL; Schaper F Chan–Evans–Lam Couplings with Copper Iminoarylsulfonate Complexes: Scope and Mechanism. ACS Catal 2018, 8 (8), 7308–7325. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES