Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 May 25;49(5):983–988. doi: 10.1007/s15010-021-01629-2

SARS-CoV-2: big seroprevalence data from Pakistan—is herd immunity at hand?

Mohsina Haq 1, Asif Rehman 1,, Junaid Ahmad 2, Usman Zafar 3, Sufyan Ahmed 4, Mumtaz Ali Khan 5, Asif Naveed 6, Hala Rajab 1, Fawad Muhammad 1, Wasifa Naushad 1, Muhammad Aman 1, Hafeez Ur Rehman 1, Sajjad Ahmad 1, Saeed Anwar 1, Najib Ul Haq 1
PMCID: PMC8145183  PMID: 34032997

Abstract

Purpose

Seroprevalence surveys from different countries have reported SARS CoV-2 antibodies below 20% even in the most adversely affected areas and herd immunity cannot be predicted till more than half of the population gets the disease. The purpose of this survey was to estimate the magnitude of community-based spread of the infection, associated immunity, and the future prospects and proximity to a ‘herd community’.

Methods

The study was undertaken as a cluster randomized, cross-sectional countrywide survey. This largest community-based seroprevalence data of SARS-CoV-2 were collected between 15th and 31st July, 2020 from seven randomly selected cities belonging to the three most populous provinces of Pakistan. The FDA approved kit of ROCHE was used for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

Results

Serum samples of 15,390 participants were tested for SARS CoV-2 antibodies with an overall seroprevalence of 42.4%. The seroprevalence ranged from 31.1% to 48.1% in different cities with the highest in Punjab province (44.5%). In univariable analysis, the odds of seropositivity was higher in men compared to women (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01–1.19, P < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, the risk of being seropositive was lower (OR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.60–0.87, P < 0.01) in younger group (≤ 20 years) than in those aged above 60 years.

Conclusion

The study concluded that despite a reasonable seroprevalence, the country is yet to reach the base minimum of estimations for herd immunity. The durability of immunity though debated at the moment, has shown an evidenced informed shift towards longer side.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s15010-021-01629-2.

Keywords: Seroprevalence, Sars, CoV-2, Antibody, Herd, Immunity

Introduction

Novel Coronavirus related disease (COVID-19) started from China in December 2019, while Pakistan declared its two positive cases on 26th Feb 2020 [1]. Word Health Organization declared SARS-CoV-2 a global pandemic on March 11, 2020 and since then the cases are on the rise world-wide, resulting in unprecedented effects on human life [2]. The WHO COVID-19 statistics of confirmed cases were 81,533,368 till December 31, 2020 including 1,799,911 deaths world-wide [3]. Like many other countries Pakistan witnessed its highest number of new cases and mortalities during the month of June 2020 followed by a steep fall [4, 5]. The measures taken by the government of Pakistan and the resultant decline in cases has been much praised by the world [6, 7] but the reasons cannot be fully explained (due to lack of supporting evidence/data) [5]. There has been a resurge of COVID-19 with start of winter and the number of confirmed cases rose by 110,530 including 2060 deaths from end of October to mid-December 2020 [8]. The widespread infection has affected all provinces of Pakistan with 230,718 cases in Sindh, 62,377 in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 147,292 cases in Punjab and 39,624 cases in capital territory Islamabad [8]. Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard to confirm SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, it may miss several pre-symptomatic and asymptomatic infections during latency and does not provide information about immunity against the disease which could help illustrate the state of herd immunity in community [9, 10]. Studies have reported cases of reinfection with SARS CoV-2 [1113] but some other studies have concluded that a positive PCR retest could be due to several other reason like infection by mutated SARS Cov-2 and technical error with specimen collection [14, 15].

Seroprevalence surveys also provide estimates of the population still vulnerable to the infection [16]. A true community-based seroprevalence survey is still lacking in Pakistan while most of the studies conducted are hospital based and with a varying level of infection (11–40%), given the fact that several of them were based on recall [1719].

Herd immunity is still not foreseeable in many countries of the world as seroprevalence population surveys reveal antibodies as low as 10–15% [20] and herd immunity cannot be predicted till more than half of the population gets the disease [21]. Herd immunity against a contagious disease like COVID-19 could be achieved when 70–90% of the population becomes immune due to mass scale vaccination or exposure to infection [22]. The second surge of COVID-19 has already been established in many countries including Pakistan [23, 24]. This makes it very important to understand the immune response in different populations as it has important public health and policy implications [25, 26]. However, it is still unclear whether herd immunity through vaccine or previous infection may be achievable.

This community-based seroprevalence study was conducted in the three major provinces of Pakistan having more than 90% of country population. The purpose was to have a better estimation of the spread of infection at the community level, the associated immunity pattern to COVID-19 and the prospects of proximity to a herd immunity in future.

Methodology

This study was undertaken as a cluster randomized, cross-sectional countrywide survey. Seven out of ninety-nine cities were randomly selected as a study clusters. In each cluster, participants were recruited via mobile camping from randomly selected Union Councils (an administrative unit within district with a population size of 25,000–35,000). The clusters included Peshawar, Karachi, Lahore, Multan, Mansehra, Rawalpindi, Multan and Hyderabad from three major provinces (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Sindh and Punjab). The study was conducted from 15th to 31st July 2020 following an approval from Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Prime Foundation, Pakistan (IRB approval no. Prime/IRB/2020-248). After taking an informed consent, 5 mL of peripheral venous blood was collected in lithium heparin container. Basic demographic data of the consenting subjected was recorded on a structured tool.

Storing, processing and diagnostic labeling of the phlebotomy samples

The samples were transported to laboratories in specialized containers ensuring temperature control. Serum was separated, centrifuged at 2500 rpm, stored in labeled cups and 20 μL used for analysis. The samples were analyzed using Elecsys® (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay. The assay uses a recombinant protein representing the nucleocapsid (N) antigen for the determination of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. It is an immunoassay for the in vitro qualitative detection of antibodies that includes IgG to SARS-CoV-2 in human serum and plasma [27]. The FDA approved kit of ROCHE used for the detection of immunoglobulins against SARS-CoV-2 has high specificity (100%) and sensitivity of more than 98.8%, according to the manufacturer [28]. However, the Public Health England estimates its specificity to be 100% but sensitivity of 87% [29]. The cut off for significant antibodies level was taken as 1 AU/mL as per manufacturers instruction.

Statistical analysis

The data was entered and analyzed in SPSS version 24.0. The means, median, standard deviations were calculated for the continuous variables, while frequencies, counts and percentages were calculated for the categorical variables. Confidence interval for the proportions were calculated using Binomial Exact methods. Chi-square test was used to compare between categorical variables like sex, age group and location. The logistic regression analysis was run to predict the odds of seropositivity among different age groups. The threshold for statistical significance was established at a P value ≤ 0.05.

Results

A total number of 15,390 serum samples (one sample per individual) were tested for SARS CoV-2 antibodies from three major provinces of Pakistan in seven different locations, as specified in the methods above. Table 1 shows the seroprevalence estimates by sex, age groups and different locations. Majority of the participants belonged to Punjab province (n = 8872, 57.6%) followed by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (n = 4797, 31.2%) and Sindh Province (n = 1721, 11.2%).

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics and seroprevalence

Number of participants
n
Seropositive
n (%)
Seronegative
n (%)
Seroprevalence (95% CI) binomial exact P value
Overall 15,390 6518 (42.4%) 8872 (57.6%) 42.4.% (41.5–43.14)a
Sex
Male 12,280 5259 (42.8%) 7021 (57·2%) 42.8% (41.9–43·7)a  < 0.05b
Female 3110 1259 (40.5%) 1851 (59.9%) 40.5% (38.7–42·2)a
Age groups
 ≤ 20 1549 568 (36.7%) 981 (63.3%) 36.7% (34.2–39.1)a  < 0.01b
21–40 9348 3957 (42.3%) 5391 (57.7%) 42.3% (41.3–43.3)a
41–60 3841 1702 (44.3%) 2139 (55.7%) 44.3% (42.7–45.9)a
Above 60 652 291 (44.6%) 361 (55.4%) 44.6% (40.7–48.5)a
Province
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 4797 2025 (42.2%) 2772 (57.8%) 42.2% (41.2–44.0)a  < 0.01b
Sindh 1721 548 (31.8%) 1173 (68.2%) 31.8% (29.6–34.1)a
Punjab 8872 3954 (44.5%) 4927 (55.5%) 44.5% (43.5–45.6)a

aUnweighted seroprevalence of SARS CoV-2 with 95% CI calculated using Binomial Exact method

bChi square test with significance level of < 0.05

Of the total, 12,280 (79.8%) were male participants and 3110 (20.2%) were female with a mean age of 35.21 years (SD ± 13.29). The age group of 21–40 years comprised the majority number of people (n = 9348, 60.7%) while the age group of above 60 years comprising the lowest number of participants (n = 652, 4.2%).

During the study period, of the total sample (n = 15,390), 6518 tested found positive for SARS COV-2 antibodies with an overall seroprevalence of 42.4% (Binomial Exact 95% CI: 41.5–43.14). In different age groups, older age group of above 60 years had the highest seropositivity (44.6%, 95% CI: 40.7–48.5) while the lowest seropositivity were estimated in younger age group of ≤ 20 (36.7%, 95% CI: 34.2–39.1) (Table 1). The seroprevalence was highest in Punjab province (44.5%) (Binomial Exact 95% CI: 43.5–45.6) followed by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (42.2%) (Binomial Exact 95% CI: 41.2–44.0) and Sindh province (31.8%) (Binomial Exact 95% CI: 29.6–34.1) with statistical significant association (P < 0.01) when chi-square test was applied. The city-wise seroprevalence was also calculated that ranged from 31.1% (Binomial Exact 95% CI: 28.8–33.3) in Mansehra city to 48.1% (Binomial Exact 95% CI: 46.3–49.8) in Peshawar city (Fig. 1). For the remaining five locations, the seroprevalence estimates fell within this range (31.1–48.1%).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in different cities of Pakistan

In univariable analysis, the odds of seropositivity was higher in men compared to women (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01–1.19, P < 0.05) but was not statistically significant in multivariable analysis (P > 0.05) (Table 2). The odds of seropositivity in multivariable analysis were low in younger age (≤ 20 years) with an OR: 0·72, 95% CI: 0.60–0.87 when compared with the age group of above 60 years and had a highly statistically significant P value of < 0.01. Similarly, the age groups of 20–40 and 41–60 years also had a lower risk of being seropositive (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.77–1.07) and (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.83–1.16) respectively to the age group of above 60 years and was found to be numerically higher (P = 0.25, P = 0.88) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Univariable and multivariable analysis of sex and age group with seropositivity

Relative variable Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis
OR 95% CI P value OR 95% CI P value
Sex
Female (Ref)
 Male 1.10 1.01–1.19 0.01* 1.07 0.99–1.16 0.07
Age group
Above 60 years (Ref)
  ≤ 20 years 0.72 0.60–0.86 0.001* 0.72 0.60–0.87 0.001*
 21–40 years 0.91 0.78–1.07 0.24 0.91 0.77–1.07 0.25
 41–60 years 0.99 0.84–1.17 0.87 0.98 0.83–1.16 0.88

Adjusted odd ratio with 95% Confidence Interval and their P value

*Refers to P value with statistically significant association

Discussion

During the current pandemic, serological testing appears to be a useful strategy to determine the human-to-human transmission of COVID-19. The utilization of serological tests in the asymptomatic population or those showing mild symptoms is crucial, as they rarely opt for PCR testing [30] masking the population's actual rate of infection. Different studies conducted in different parts of the world have indicated that many people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 showed no symptoms [3133].

This study conducted serological tests for COVID-19 of the population from three provinces of Pakistan. The seropositivity increased with increase in age in our study. An up-to-date review by Lai and colleagues reported this to be the case in some other studies also but was not a universal finding, however in all the studies [34]. Furthermore, neither they nor Anand et al. in a big data review in USA found any significant difference for seropositivity among the males and females [34, 35]. Our study on multivariable analysis also did not find any significant difference for seropositivity among the sexes. However, the study found out an overall seroprevalence of 42.4%. Knowing that when majority of a population is immune to an infectious disease, it provides an indirect protection, i.e., herd immunity to those who are not immune to the disease. Given that effective vaccination for COVID-19 has host of affordability and supply-chain issues especially for developing countries coupled with the fact that the influenza viruses are believed to be rapidly mutating, the natural course of infection remains the major possibility for acquiring herd immunity [36].

Questions have been raised about the time duration of the immunity against COVID-19. A recent study published in Science Journal reported that immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 can last longer than six months and revealed further that spike-IgG was relatively stable over six-plus months, and spike-specific memory B cells were more abundant at six months than at one month [37].

The news regarding the emergence of a variant of concern (VOC) in UK of Brazilian origin might pose a challenging scenario in terms of tracking and controlling the spread of the VOCs and understanding their effects on the pandemic especially in the low to middle income countries (LMICs). This as well as the short-lived immunity associated with flu like pandemics doesn’t preclude reinfection and problems in achieving a herd immunity [38].

Conclusion

The overall seroprevalence of SARS CoV-2 antibodies in Pakistan was reasonably high in this study (as of June 2020) but still short of the base minimum for herd immunity. The seroprevalence varied in the different cities of Pakistan and by age and gender, also. The immunity though dependent on a number of the agent, host, and environment factors, may not be very short-lived (3 months or so as was believed earlier), and with passing time, evidence is mounting that points towards longevity of the immunity much beyond that.

Limitation

A limitation to keep in mind might be the selection bias that may have occurred due to voluntary participation from randomly selected UCs.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all study participants, the field and the lab staff involved in serum collection and analysis for this study.

Abbreviations

SARS CoV-2

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

COVID-19

Coronavirus infectious disease

KPK

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

RT-PCR

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

UCs

Union councils

FDA

Food and drug administration

VOC

Variants of concern

LMICs

Low to middle income countries

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by Al-Khidmat Health Foundation while SARS CoV-2 antibody kits were donated by ROCHE.

Availability of data and material

Study data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors of this study declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this study.

References

  • 1.Noreen N, Dil S, Niazi S, Naveed I, Khan N, Khan F, et al. COVID 19 pandemic & Pakistan; limitations and gaps. Glob Biosecurity [Internet]. 2020 May 21 [cited 2020 Nov 15]; 1(4). Available from http://jglobalbiosecurity.com/articles/10.31646/gbio.63/
  • 2.Mahase E. Covid-19: WHO declares pandemic because of “alarming levels” of spread, severity, and inaction. BMJ. 2020;m1036. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard [Internet]. Covid19.who.int. 2020 [cited 13 December 2020]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/?ftag=MSF0951a18
  • 4.Pakistan Coronavirus: 356,904 Cases and 7,141 Deaths—Worldometer [Internet]. [cited 2020 Nov 15]. Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/pakistan/
  • 5.Unexplained decline in COVID-19 cases’ puzzles health experts [Internet]. Thenews.com.pk.2020 [cited 18 December 2020]. Available from: https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/687387-unexplained-decline-in-covid-19-cases-in-pakistan-puzzles-health-experts-and-policymakers
  • 6.Former WB chief economist praises Pakistan’s handling of coronavirus [Internet]. [cited 2020 Nov 15]. Available from: https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/731496-former-wb-chief-economist-praises-pakistan-s-handling-of-coronavirus
  • 7.Dawn.com A. WHO chief lauds Pakistan for suppressing Covid-19 while keeping economy afloat [Internet]. DAWN.COM. 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 15]. Available from: https://www.dawn.com/news/1582311
  • 8.COVID-19 Health Advisory Platform by Ministry of National Health Services Regulations and Coordination [Internet]. Covid.gov.pk. 2020 [cited 18 December 2020]. Available from: https://covid.gov.pk/.
  • 9.Gao Z, Xu Y, Sun C, Wang X, Guo Y, Qiu S, et al. A systematic review of asymptomatic infections with COVID-19. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2021;54:12–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Moghadas S, Fitzpatrick M, Sah P, Pandey A, Shoukat A, Singer BH, et al. The implications of silent transmission for the control of COVID-19 outbreaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117:17513–17515. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2008373117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ye G, Pan Z, Pan Y, Deng Q, Chen L, Li J, et al. Clinical characteristics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reactivation. J Infect. 2020;80:e14–e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ravioli S, Ochsner H, Lindner G. Reactivation of COVID-19 pneumonia: a report of two cases. J Infect. 2020;81:e72–e73. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Loconsole D, Passerini F, Palmieri V, Centrone F, Sallustio A, Pugliese S, et al. Recurrence of COVID-19 after recovery: a case report from Italy. Infection. 2020;48:965–967. doi: 10.1007/s15010-020-01444-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.SeyedAlinaghi S, Oliaei S, Kianzad S, Afsahi A, MohsseniPour M, Barzegary A, et al. Reinfection risk of novel coronavirus (CoVID-19): a systematic review of current evidence. World J Virol. 2020;9:79–90. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v9.i5.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Colson P, Finaud M, Levy N, Lagier J, Raoult D. Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 re-infection with a different genotype. J Infect. 2021;82:84–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Khan S, Qurieshi M, Haq I, Majid S, Bhat A, Nabi S, et al. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG antibodies in District Srinagar, northern India—a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0239303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Younas A, Waheed S, Khawaja S, Imam M, Borhany M, Shamsi T. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthy blood donors in Karachi, Pakistan. Transf Apheresis Sci. 2020;59:102923. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2020.102923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Javed W, Baqar JB, Abidi SHB, Farooq W. Sero-prevalence findings from metropoles in Pakistan: implications for assessing COVID-19 prevalence and case-fatality within a dense, urban working population. Arch Epidemiol. 2020;4:143. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chughtai OR, Batool H, Khan MD, Chughtai AS. Frequency of COVID-19 IgG antibodies among special police Squad Lahore, Pakistan. J Coll Physician Surg Pak. 2020;30:735–739. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.07.735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Byambasuren O, Dobler C, Bell K, Rojas DP, Clark J, McLaws M-L, et al. Comparison of seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections with cumulative and imputed COVID-19 cases: systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0248946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fontanet A, Cauchemez S. COVID-19 herd immunity: where are we? Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20:583–584. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-00451-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rogers L, Health J. What is herd immunity and how can we achieve it with COVID-19? [Internet]. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. 2020 [cited 18 December 2020]. Available from: https://www.jhsph.edu/covid-19/articles/achieving-herd-immunity-with-covid19.html
  • 23.Looi M. Covid-19: is a second wave hitting Europe?. BMJ. 2020:m4113. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 24.Second wave of Covid-19 in Pakistan; are more episodes down the road? [Internet]. The BMJ. 2020 [cited 18 December 2020]. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4113/rr-0
  • 25.Nature. 2020. Why decoding the immune response to COVID matters for vaccines. Nature. Accessed: 10 Aug 2020. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02943-9
  • 26.Nature. 2020. Why decoding the immune response to COVID matters for vaccines. Nature. Accessed: 14 June 2020. Available from: https://media.nature.com/original/magazine-assets/d41586-020-02943-9/d41586-020-02943-9
  • 27.Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 [Internet]. Diagnostics. 2021 [cited 01 April 2021]. Available from: https://diagnostics.roche.com/global/en/products/params/elecsys-anti-sars-cov-2.html
  • 28.Roche’s COVID-19 antibody test receives FDA Emergency Use Authorization and is available in markets accepting the CE mark. Accessed 14 Sep, 2020.Available from: http://www.roche.com/media/releases/med-cor-2020-05-03.html
  • 29.Baraniuk C. Covid-19 antibody tests: a briefing. BMJ. 2020;369:m2284. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Infantino M, Damiani A, Li Gobbi F, Grossi V, Lari B, Macchia D, et al. An overview on advantages and limitations of serological assays for saRs-coV-2 infectious disease. Italian J Lab Med. 2020;16:7–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sutton D, Fuchs K, D'Alton M, Goffman D. Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 in women admitted for delivery. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2163–2164. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2009316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li R, Pei S, Chen B, Song Y, Zhang T, Yang W, et al. Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Science. 2020;368:489–493. doi: 10.1126/science.abb3221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gudbjartsson DF, Helgason A, Jonsson H, Magnusson OT, Melsted P, Norddahl GL, et al. Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the Icelandic population. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2302–2315. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2006100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lai C, Wang J, Hsueh P. Population-based seroprevalence surveys of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody: an up-to-date review. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;101:314–322. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Anand S, Montez-Rath M, Han J, Bozeman J, Kerschmann R, Beyer P, et al. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a large nationwide sample of patients on dialysis in the USA: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2020;396:1335–1344. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32009-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mills MC, Salisbury D. The challenges of distributing COVID-19 vaccinations. E Clin Med. 2020;100674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.Dan JM, Mateus J, Kato Y, et al. Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for up to 8 months after infection. Science. 2021;371:eabf4069. doi: 10.1126/science.abf4063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Covid-19: Brazil 'variant of concern' detected in UK [Internet]. BBC News. 2021 [cited 01 April 2021]. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-56233038

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Study data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Infection are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES