Abstract
Introduction
The mental health effects of coronavirus is found to be high in health care professionals, patients and communities. Therefore, this review tried to summarize the prevalence and associated factors of the psychological impact of COVID-19 among the health care workers (HCWs), patients and communities in Ethiopia.
Methods
The studies from Medline via PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar were searched from February 17 to March 17, 2021. PRISMA-2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) was used to conduct this review.
Result
Initially, 2190 publications were obtained from three databases (PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar). Finally, 9 articles that fulfilled eligible criteria were included in the review. Among different types of mental health impacts stress was reported that lies in the range from 18% to 100%, anxiety was reported from 27.7% to 100%, depression was from 12.4% to 55.7%. Several factors were associated with negative psychological impacts of COVID-19 among health care workers, patients and communities such as level of education, occupation, gender, age, marital status, presence of co-morbidity, lack of social support, personal/family exposure, their attitude, income level, family size, presence of respiratory symptoms, substance use, area of residence, and lack of protective equipment.
Conclusion
There was overall high psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare workers, communities, and patients. The most common indicators of psychological impact reported across studies were anxiety and stress. Therefore, online psychotherapy and cognitive behavioral and mindfulness-based therapies should be provided through smartphone applications to minimize psychological impacts of COVID-19.
Keywords: COVID-19, Associated factors, Prevalence, Psychological impacts, Ethiopia
Highlights
-
•
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a new pathogen of virus that was first discovered in Wuhan.
-
•
The emergency of this coronavirus has resulted in a variety of mental health impact.
-
•
The psychological impact of coronavirus is found to be high in health care professionals and the community.
1. Introduction
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a new pathogen of virus that was first discovered in Wuhan, China, and which is currently infects human unlike SARS, MERS, and influenza virus [1,2].
The emergency of this coronavirus has resulted in a variety of mental health impact such as major depressive disorder, fear, and stress [3]. The increase in negative psychological impacts of this disease is as the result of the rapid spread of the virus, increased access to information and higher case fatality rate [4,5].
During this pandemic period, having mental and psychological problems leads to poor self-care practice, appetite, sleep, immunity status, and compliance to the instructions given by health care provider that exposed them to infectious etiology [6].
The psychological impact of coronavirus is found to be high in health care professionals and the community [1,7]. Among different types of psychological impacts, anxiety, depression, panic attacks, or psychotic symptoms were highly reported [8,9].
The mental health impact of a disease outbreak is usually neglected during pandemic management although the consequences are costly. Early evidence has shown that health workers directly involved in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of patients with COVID-19 are at risk of developing mental health symptoms [10].
Different risk factors can predispose to the high burden of the mental health impacts such as being a female, increase in age, the presence of concomitant disease, inadequate social support, increased the number of family size, low socio-economic status, occupations and level of educations [1,3,6]. Besides this the fear of being contagious and infecting others, physical exhaustion, and a lack of sufficient protective equipment are a predictors of poor mental health impacts [[11], [12], [13]].
Know days the COVID-19 pandemic became widely affects the community, patients and health care providers in Ethiopia [11]. The psychological effects of this disease might be high in developing country including Ethiopia as the result of lack of resources, unorganized health care system, and inadequate health care professionals. Despite a scanty of reviews were conducted on the mental health impacts of COVID-19 globally, there was no systematic reviews done in Ethiopia and the culture and socio-demographic characteristics of the included participants were different which necessitates the need to summarizes the variety of findings among community, patients and HCWs in Ethiopia.
2. Methods
2.1. Searching strategy
The objective of the review was to conclude the magnitude and risk factors of poor mental health effects of COVID-19 in Ethiopia. The protocol of PRISMA-2020 was used to undertake this systematic review [14]. Three authors namely FB, DFM, and BS were involved in searching different literatures from three data bases like PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. The time period used to conduct this review was from the February 17 to March 17, 2021. The searched literatures were imported into Endnote X5 to eliminate any duplication. The MESH term for the database was (Psychological impacts AND Coronaviruses disease-19 AND Healthcare workers AND Community AND Patients OR determinants OR prevalence AND Ethiopia).
2.2. Eligibility criteria
The published articles on magnitude and associated factors of COVID-19 in Ethiopia having a primary outcome and full texts available were included. The articles with unknown primary outcomes, systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies, not peer reviewed and commentary to editors were not eligible.
2.3. Data abstraction
The articles fulfilling the inclusion criteria were extracted on separate data sheet. The outcome of the interest extracted were the socio-demographic characteristics, different psychological impacts along with the authors name and year of the study.
2.4. Methodology quality assessment
To assess the quality of the methodology the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment tool was used [15]. As per the tool 5 researches were good [11,[16], [17], [18], [19]],3 were fair [1,6,20], 1 article was poor [21].
3. Results
3.1. Search results
A total of 2190 articles were obtained up on initial searching from PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. A total of 1352 articles were removed due to duplications. Finally a total of 918 articles were excluded by observing their title and abstracts. Consequently, only 20 articles were subject to a full-text review. Finally, 9 articles were selected to be included in our review (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Flow chart of the systematic research and study selection process.
3.2. Characteristics of studies included in this review
In our review the filtered articles were cross-sectional studies. Articles included in this study were conducted among patients, health care workers and community. The majority of the participant were male in five of the articles [1,11,16,17,21], whereas female was predominant in the three articles [6,18,19] and one articles was only done among female students [20]. Regarding to the study participants three of articles were conducted on health care workers [1,11,18],two of them were on community [6,21]. Another two articles were on patients, one articles was on university students [16], whereas one articles was on women attending perinatal services [20] (Table 1).
Table 1.
Summary of baseline characteristics of the articles that were previously published and included studies in the systematic review, 2021.
| Primary author | Year of publication | Study design | (study setting/population) | Average age in years | Sample size | Gender (Female %) | Occupation/Educational status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kassaw CH et al [6] | 2020 | Cross-sectional | Community | – | 420 | 55% |
|
| Aylie NS et al [16] | 2020 | Cross-sectional | Students | 22.58 ± 2.8 | 322 | 36.6% |
|
|
Teshome A et al [11] |
2020 |
Cross-sectional |
Health Care Workers |
29.29 ± 5.69 |
798 |
39.6% |
|
|
Chekole YA et al [1] |
2020 |
Cross-sectional |
Health Care Workers |
|
244 |
34% |
|
| Kassaw CH et al [20] | 2020 | Cross-sectional | Women's attending at the perinatal service |
|
178 | 100% |
|
| Adhena G et al [21]. | 2020 | Cross-sectional | Community |
|
422 | 48.3% |
|
|
Hajure M et al [17] |
Cross-sectional |
Chronic Medical Patients |
|
411 |
64.8% |
|
|
|
Kibret S et al [18] |
Cross-sectional |
Healthcare workers |
|
305 |
65.9% |
|
|
| Addis SG et al [19] | Cross-sectional | Chronic disease patients |
48.2 ± 15.83 | 413 | 52.1% |
|
3.3. Risk of bias
The blindness and hiddenness of the outcomes were sufficient in 5 articles [1,6,16,18,19] and not known in remaining 4 articles. The study populations was unknown in 3 articles and well known in the remaining 6 [6], [16], [1], [17], [18], [19][1,6,[16], [17], [18], [19]]. We have obtained complete outcome variables in all articles except one article [6]. Other types of bias were not found in our systematic review.
3.4. Prevalence of the psychological impact of COVID-19
Anxiety was the common psychological impacts in the study of Kassaw CH et al. 36% [6].and Hajure M et al. 61.8% [17], whereas three articles were only measures anxiety [11,18,20].Stress was only predominant according to study of Aylie NS et al. 32.5% [16],whereas the study of Chekole YA et al. and Adhena G et al. solely reported stress as psychological impacts of COVID-9 [1,21]. Among different psychological impacts of COVID-19 depression was the least commonly occurred in three findings of Kassaw CH et al. 12.4% [6], Aylie NS et al. 21.2% [16] and Hajure M et al. 55.7% [17] [Table 2].
Table 2.
Summary of included studies on Prevalence and Associated Factors of Psychological impact of COVID-19 among Community, Health Care workers and Patients in Ethiopia, 2021.
| Author | Psychological impact | Determinants | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kassaw CH et al [6] |
|
|
|
| Aylie NS et al [16] |
|
|
|
| Teshome A et al [11] |
|
|
|
| Chekole YA et al [1] |
|
|
|
| Kassaw CH et al [20] |
|
|
|
| Adhena G et al [21]. |
|
|
|
| Hajure M et al [17] |
|
|
|
| Kibret S et al [18] |
|
|
|
| Addis SG et al [19] |
|
|
|
3.5. Factors associated with the psychological impact of COVID-19
It was found that variable factors were associated with increase in psychological impacts of COVID-19. In our review being a female was the most predictors of psychological impacts of coronavirus disease according to the reports of Kassaw CH et al., Aylie NS et al. Hajure M et al. and Addis SG et al. [6,16,17,19]. Similarly age was a determinants of mental health effects of COVID-19 in four reports of Chekole YA et al., Hajure M et al., Kibret S et al. and Addis SG et al. [1,[17], [18], [19]]. The level of educations was strongly associated with the increased risk of different psychological effects like anxiety, depression and stress in three findings of Kassaw CH et al., Chekole YA et al. and Kassaw CH et al. [1,6,20].
Apart from the socio-demographic factors lack of social support during coronavirus pandemics was a determinants of negative mental health impacts according to the study of Aylie NS et al., Kassaw CH et al., Hajure M et al. and Addis SG et al. [16,17,19,20].
Substance use was a predictors of anxiety, depression and stress in two findings of Aylie NS et al. and Hajure M et al. [16,17].Families having COVID-19 was the most risk factors for developing the negative mental health effects in two studies of Aylie NS et al. and Kibret S et al. [16,18] [Table 2].
4. Discussion
The results of our study revealed a high prevalence of anxiety and stress among patients, community and health care workers during the outbreak of COVID-19 virus. This is consistent to the finding of China [3],Oman [22]. However, anxiety and depression was the most commonly occurred psychological impacts according to the study of Luo M et al., 2020 [9].The study of Nepal and China showed that anxiety, depression and insomnia were the most commonly occurred mental health impacts [10,23]. In Saudi Arabia depression was the widely occurred psychological features [24]. The variable reports of psychological impacts might be due to the fact that different socio-demographic characteristics and psychological comorbidities of included HCW, patients and community across different country.
In this study, female and young participants were more likely to experience moderate to severe anxiety, stress and depression compared to males [1,6,[16], [17], [18], [19]]. Similar findings have been reported in Oman [22]. The study of Luo M et al., 2020 also founds high rates of psychological impacts among womens [9]. On the contrary, gender was not a predictors of anxiety and stress in Peru [25]. This is due to women may be more stressed during lockdown, as they may be over proportionately burdened by childcare duties.
It was found that Social support correlated with less mental health problems [16,17,19,20]. This is consistent with the study of Muller AE et al., 2020 [12]. Similarly, perceived social support was negatively correlated to Depression, anxiety and stress scale scores in China [3].
Inadequate Protective measures and contact history were the independent risk factors for Psychological features [6,11,16,18,21]. This is inline to the study of In China [26]. However, contact history was not have determined the mental health impacts in Indian community [27].
The presence of social drug use like tobacco have a the association with the psychological effects of COVID-19 [16,17].This is differ to the finding of Indonesia [28].This is due to the increase in risk of psychological features as the results of substance use that can precipitates the mental health impacts of COVID-19.
As a limitation, all included studies were cross-sectional, which was difficult to identify causal effect relationships. The other weakness includes the limited number of published articles was obtained, meta-analysis was not performed and heterogeneity of the articles, all psychological impacts were not studied in some articles. Besides this, a search for the gray literature was not conducted and only published, peer-reviewed articles were included and most articles failed to report proper randomization techniques.
5. Conclusion
In the current systematic review, we have observed an overall high psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare workers, community, and patients. The most common indicators of psychological impact reported across studies were anxiety and stress. Common risk factors of heavier psychological burden included being women, younger age, poor social support, substance use, occupation, marital status, educational status, monthly income, and contact history. Therefore, online psychotherapy and cognitive behavioral and mindfulness-based therapies should be provided through smartphone applications to minimize a various determinants of psychological impacts of COVID-19. Besides to this HCWs should strongly provide mental health support to their clients by waiving fees for mental health services, offering additional support and increasing awareness of mental health.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.
Consent
Not applicable. No individual person's personal details, images or videos are being used in this study.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Funding
No funding was received.
Author contribution
FB involved in the searching of the literature, extraction of results and editing the manuscript. DFM involved in the interpretation and revision of this systematic literature review. BS involved in searching of the literature and editing the manuscript.
Registration of research studies
1. Name of the registry: RESEARCH REGISTRY, https://www.researchregistry.com.
2. Unique Identifying number or registration ID: reviewregistry1130.
3. Hyperlink to the registration (must be publicly accessible): https://www.researchregistry.com/register-now#home/registrationdetails/5d70f2520791fb0011b79e9f/
Guarantor
The Guarantor is the one or more people who accept full responsibility for the work and/or the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish.
Firomsa Bekele.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declared that they have no competing interest.
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102403.
Abbreviations
- COVID
Coronavirus disease
- HCW
Health care workers
- NIH
National Institute of health
- PRISMA
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
- UK
United Kingdom
- USA
United States of America
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following are the Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Chekole Y.A., Yimer Minaye S., Mekonnen Abate S., Mekuriaw B. Perceived stress and its associated factors during COVID-19 among healthcare providers in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Adv Public Health. 2020 Sep 24:2020. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shaukat N., Ali D.M., Razzak J. Physical and mental health impacts of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: a scoping review. Int. J. Emerg. Med. 2020 Dec;13(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12245-020-00299-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Si M.Y., Su X.Y., Jiang Y., Wang W.J., Gu X.F., Ma L., Li J., Zhang S.K., Ren Z.F., Ren R., Liu Y.L. Psychological impact of COVID-19 on medical care workers in China. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020 Dec;9(1):1–3. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00724-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Salari N., Hosseinian-Far A., Jalali R., Vaisi-Raygani A., Rasoulpoor S., Mohammadi M., Rasoulpoor S., Khaledi-Paveh B. Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob. Health. 2020 Dec;16(1) doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00589-w. 1-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Al-Hanawi M.K., Mwale M.L., Alshareef N., Qattan A.M., Angawi K., Almubark R., Alsharqi O. Psychological distress amongst health workers and the general public during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia. Risk Manag. Healthc. Pol. 2020;13:733. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S264037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kassaw C. The magnitude of psychological problem and associated factor in response to COVID-19 pandemic among communities living in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, March 2020: a cross-sectional study design. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2020;13:631. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S256551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Buselli R., Corsi M., Baldanzi S., Chiumiento M., Del Lupo E., Dell'Oste V., Bertelloni C.A., Massimetti G., Dell'Osso L., Cristaudo A., Carmassi C. Professional quality of life and mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to Sars-Cov-2 (Covid-19) Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health. 2020 Jan;17(17):6180. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bekele F., Hajure M. Magnitude and determinants of the psychological impact of COVID-19 among health care workers: A systematic review. SAGE Open Medicine. 2021 April;9 doi: 10.1177/20503121211012512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Luo M., Guo L., Yu M., Wang H. The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public–A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatr. Res. 2020 Jun 7 doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Khanal P., Devkota N., Dahal M., Paudel K., Joshi D. Mental health impacts among health workers during COVID-19 in a low resource setting: a cross-sectional survey from Nepal. Glob. Health. 2020 Dec;16(1):1–2. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00621-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Teshome A., Glagn M., Shegaze M., Tekabe B., Getie A., Assefa G., Getahun D., Kanko T., Getachew T., Yenesew N., Temtmie Z. Generalized anxiety disorder and its associated factors among health care workers fighting COVID-19 in southern Ethiopia. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2020;13:907. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S282822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Muller R.A., Stensland R.S., van de Velde R.S. The mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: a rapid systematic review. Psychiatr. Res. 2020 Sep 1 doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Semo B.W., Frissa S.M. The mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: implications for sub-Saharan Africa. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2020;13:713. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S264286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. MetaArXiv Preprints. 2020 doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.National Institutes of Health Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. 2004. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines
- 16.Aylie N.S., Mekonen M.A., Mekuria R.M. The psychological impacts of COVID-19 pandemic among university students in Bench-Sheko Zone, South-west Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2020;13:813. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S275593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hajure M., Tariku M., Mohammedhussein M., Dule A. Depression, anxiety and associated factors among chronic medical patients amid COVID-19 pandemic in Mettu Karl Referral Hospital, Mettu, Ethiopia. Neuropsychiatric Dis. Treat. 2020;16:2511. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S281995. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kibret S., Teshome D., Fenta E., Hunie M., Tamire T. Prevalence of anxiety towards COVID-19 and its associated factors among healthcare workers in a Hospital of Ethiopia. PloS One. 2020 Dec 8;15(12) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Addis S.G., Nega A.D., Miretu D.G. Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on chronic disease patients in Dessie town government and private hospitals, Northeast Ethiopia. Diabet Metabol Syndrome: Clin. Res. Rev. 2021 Jan 1;15(1):129–135. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.12.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pandey D. The prevalence of general anxiety disorder and its associated factors among women's attending at the perinatal service of Dilla University referral hospital, Dilla town, Ethiopia, April, 2020 in Covid pandemic. Heliyon. 2020 Nov 1;6(11) doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Adhena G., Temesgen T. Perceived stress associated with COVID-19 pandemic in korem, tigray, Ethiopia: community based crossectional study. Science. 2020 Nov 4;8(6):155–160. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Badahdah A., Khamis F., Al Mahyijari N., Al Balushi M., Al Hatmi H., Al Salmi I., Albulushi Z., Al Noomani J. The mental health of health care workers in Oman during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatr. 2020 Jul 8 doi: 10.1177/0020764020939596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cai Q., Feng H., Huang J., Wang M., Wang Q., Lu X., Xie Y., Wang X., Liu Z., Hou B., Ouyang K. The mental health of frontline and non-frontline medical workers during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: a case-control study. J. Affect. Disord. 2020 Oct 1;275:210–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Alkhamees A.A., Alrashed S.A., Alzunaydi A.A., Almohimeed A.S., Aljohani M.S. The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the general population of Saudi Arabia. Compr. Psychiatr. 2020 Oct 1;102:152192. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yáñez J.A., Jahanshahi A.A., Alvarez-Risco A., Li J., Zhang S.X. Anxiety, distress, and turnover intention of healthcare workers in Peru by their distance to the epicenter during the COVID-19 crisis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2020 Oct 7;103(4):1614–1620. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Xiao X., Zhu X., Fu S., Hu Y., Li X., Xiao J. Psychological impact of healthcare workers in China during COVID-19 pneumonia epidemic: a multi-center cross-sectional survey investigation. J. Affect. Disord. 2020 Sep 1;274:405–410. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Temsah M.H., Al-Sohime F., Alamro N., Al-Eyadhy A., Al-Hasan K., Jamal A., Al-Maglouth I., Aljamaan F., Al Amri M., Barry M., Al-Subaie S. The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on health care workers in a MERS-CoV endemic country. J Infect Public Health. 2020 Jun 1;13(6):877–882. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.05.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Margaretha S.E., Effendy C., Kusnanto H., Hasinuddin m. Determinants psychological distress of Indonesian health care providers during covid-19 pandemic. Sys. Rev. Pharm. 2020;11(6):1052–1059. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.