Skip to main content
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease logoLink to Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
. 2021 Apr 29;8(5):48. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8050048

Regulation of Cardiac Conduction and Arrhythmias by Ankyrin/Spectrin-Based Macromolecular Complexes

Drew Nassal 1,2, Jane Yu 1,2, Dennison Min 1,2, Cemantha Lane 1,2, Rebecca Shaheen 1,2, Daniel Gratz 1,2, Thomas J Hund 1,2,3,*
Editors: Thomas Brand, Takashi Mikawa
PMCID: PMC8146975  PMID: 33946725

Abstract

The cardiac conduction system is an extended network of excitable tissue tasked with generation and propagation of electrical impulses to signal coordinated contraction of the heart. The fidelity of this system depends on the proper spatio-temporal regulation of ion channels in myocytes throughout the conduction system. Importantly, inherited or acquired defects in a wide class of ion channels has been linked to dysfunction at various stages of the conduction system resulting in life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia. There is growing appreciation of the role that adapter and cytoskeletal proteins play in organizing ion channel macromolecular complexes critical for proper function of the cardiac conduction system. In particular, members of the ankyrin and spectrin families have emerged as important nodes for normal expression and regulation of ion channels in myocytes throughout the conduction system. Human variants impacting ankyrin/spectrin function give rise to a broad constellation of cardiac arrhythmias. Furthermore, chronic neurohumoral and biomechanical stress promotes ankyrin/spectrin loss of function that likely contributes to conduction disturbances in the setting of acquired cardiac disease. Collectively, this review seeks to bring attention to the significance of these cytoskeletal players and emphasize the potential therapeutic role they represent in a myriad of cardiac disease states.

Keywords: pacemaking, arrhythmia, ankyrin, spectrin

1. Introduction

Over an average lifetime, the heart beats more than 2 billion times with very little margin for failure. Adding to this challenge, heart rate must adapt to acute and chronic changes in physiologic demands to maintain effective cardiac output. Thus, generation of the heartbeat requires a highly coordinated system that is both durable and flexible. An elaborate cardiac conduction system, comprised of excitable tissues responsible for initiation and organized spread of the electrical impulse, provides the necessary support for the daunting task of reliable control of heart rate and rhythm. Dysfunction of the cardiac conduction system is a common cause of cardiac arrhythmia leading to dyspnea, syncope, fatigue, heart failure symptoms, chest pain, or cardiac arrest, often resulting in cardiac pacemaker implantations at the rate of more than 1 million each year around the world [1].

The cardiac conduction system may be roughly divided into an electrical impulse generation component (primarily the sinoatrial node) and impulse conducting component (e.g., atrioventricular node and His-Purkinje system). Electrophysiological properties are highly heterogeneous throughout the conduction system reflecting variable ion channel expression and tissue structure [2]. Not surprisingly, a large number of acquired or inherited defects in ion channels expressed in myocytes in the conduction system have been associated with cardiac conduction/rhythm disturbances and arrhythmia [3,4,5]. While the majority of therapeutic approaches for addressing heart rhythm or conduction defects attempt to target specific channels and their function, there is growing appreciation for the importance of associated cytoskeletal and adapter proteins in maintaining normal ion channel function [6,7,8,9]. We aim with this review to highlight the role of the underlying cytoskeletal elements, particularly ankyrin and spectrin polypeptides, in organizing macromolecular complexes for regulation of ion channel activity and membrane excitability in myocytes throughout the cardiac conduction system.

2. The Cardiac Conduction System in Health and Disease

Proper function of the cardiac conduction system depends on coordinated activity of a heterogeneous collection of excitable cells distributed throughout the heart. In turn, normal myocyte excitability depends on orchestrated function of a diverse assortment of ion channels (Figure 1). The myocyte maintains tight spatio-temporal control over ion channel function through organization of ion channel macromolecular complexes involving a host of adapter, cytoskeletal and regulatory molecules [6,10]. While defects in ion channels themselves are closely linked to cardiac conduction disturbances and arrhythmia, there is growing evidence that disruption of associated adapter/cytoskeletal proteins also underlies cardiac conduction system dysfunction.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Major ion channels underlying the action potential from different regions of the cardiac conduction system. (A) Schematic of major ion channels and representative action potentials from (A,B) sinoatrial node and (C,D) ventricular myocytes. Channels are color coded to correspond to phase of the AP where they make an important contribution. Abbreviations are as follows: Acetylcholine-activated K+ current (IKAch); Inward rectifier K+ current (IK1); L-type Ca2+ current (ICa); Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (INaCa); Na+/K+ ATPase (INaK); plateau K+ current (IKp); rapid (IKr) and slow (IKs) delayed rectifier K+ currents; sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR); SR Ca2+ release channel (RyR2); SR Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA); transient outward K+ current (Ito); TWIK-related K+ channel 1 current (Itrek); T-type Ca2+ current (ICa,T); voltage-gated Na+ current (INa).

2.1. Normal Physiology of the Cardiac Conduction System

The normal heartbeat begins with a spontaneous electrical impulse generated by the sinoatrial node (SAN), a specialized crescent-shaped tissue less than an inch in length located in the wall of the right atrium adjacent to the opening of the superior vena cava. From the SAN, activation spreads through the atria and to the atrioventricular node (AVN), which serves as a gateway for electrical activation between the atria and ventricles. The impulse then travels from the AVN to the ventricles through the His-Purkinje system comprised of the AV bundle, right and left bundle branches that run along the interventricular septum and finally Purkinje fibers that allow the action potential to spread rapidly in an organized fashion through the ventricular free walls. Each component of the cardiac conduction system is imbued with unique electrophysiological and structural features to support its specific role. For example, the SAN, unlike the majority of cardiac tissue, does not have a stable resting membrane potential, but instead generates spontaneous firing through cyclical depolarizing events. Changes in the firing rate of the SAN node contribute to changes in heart rate to meet changing physiologic demands of the body. The AVN also displays automaticity but at an intrinsic rate slower than the SAN allowing it to serve in a backup capacity for pacemaking in the event of SAN failure. The AVN supports very slow conduction, which helps insulate the ventricles in the case of rapid, arrhythmic activity in the atria. Purkinje myocytes support extremely rapid conduction and are bundled in insulated fibers to prevent premature or inappropriate ventricular activation. Purkinje-muscle junctions allow for coupling with slow and safe conduction to prevent propagation failure resulting from source-sink mismatch between the small, current generating volume of the Purkinje fiber and very large surrounding ventricular mass.

2.2. Cardiac Conduction System Dysfunction and Disease

Generation of the cardiac action potential within these various subregions of the heart and the electrical propagation between them is the result of the coordination of an array of Na+, K+ and Ca2+ ion channels. Mutations resulting in both gain- and loss-of-function changes in these ion transport proteins are not only sufficient to generate arrhythmic dysfunction in both rhythm and rate of the heart, but have been critical to understanding the function of for each of these players. Importantly, inherited and acquired defects in a host of ion channels have been identified in myocytes throughout the conduction system and are linked to various descriptions of cardiac arrhythmia, resulting in defects in cardiac automaticity and/or conduction [5]. Specific disruptions to heart rate include SAN dysfunction (also referred to as sinus node disease [SND] or sick sinus syndrome [SSS]) where the primary pacemaker is unable to generate appropriate heart rates for the physiologic demands of the body. This includes sinus bradycardia and tachycardia, sinus arrest, sinus-exit block, or chronotropic incompetence, leading to instances of exercise intolerance or syncope [11,12]. Development of such conditions can be the outcome of both genetic causes as well as acquired states, often being induced from electrical and structural remodeling associated with pathologic states such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure, ischemia, or simply aging. Acquired dysfunction may also be the result of drug intoxication from a variety of compounds, including β-blockers, Ca2+ channel blockers and digitalis [3]. Other rate disorders can arise from AV node block, which occurs when there is partial or complete block of impulse propagation through the AVN, resulting in delays between atrial and ventricular tissue in mild cases, or complete uncoupling in the most severe. Alternatively, a condition known as Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome, describes a state of early excitation of the ventricles through an accessory pathway that bypasses the slow conduction of the AV node, shortening the interval between atrial and ventricular excitation, resulting in tachycardia and impairment of proper filling of the ventricular chambers.

In addition to rate disturbances, cardiac conduction system dysfunction can result in abnormal rhythm arising from changes in myocyte excitability and/or intercellular communication that impact the ability of the electrical impulse to propagate through the heart. Disruption to conduction can lead to conduction disease, which includes left and right bundle branch block, causing asynchronous contraction of the ventricles. More severe consequences of conduction disorders are arrhythmias, including atrial flutter/fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation. Such arrhythmias can arise from disruption to normal states of conduction but are also the consequence of genetic or acquired remodeling of the cardiac action potential, including long QT syndrome, short QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT). These conditions can provide pathologic substrates for creating arrhythmias by impacting the dynamics of cellular excitability or providing their own excitation decoupled from normal sinus rhythm. Despite appreciation for the association between disruption of ion channel function/expression and conduction disease, the mechanistic underpinnings, especially in acquired disease, are not fully understood. At the same time, there is growing appreciation that aside from primary defects in ion channels, dysfunction of associated adaptor and cytoskeletal proteins give rise to arrhythmia. In particular, mounting data support a critical role for ankyrin and spectrin proteins in organizing ion channel macromolecular complexes in myocytes throughout the cardiac conduction system with strong link to inherited and acquired forms of disease. Moreover, these adapter complexes have been identified to regulate a range of ion channel targets, suggesting their potential influence to induce and/or restore proper balance of cardiac electrophysiology targets.

3. Ankyrins in the Cardiac Conduction System

Ankyrins are adapter proteins that link membrane proteins (e.g., ion channels and transporters, cell adhesion molecules, and signaling proteins) to the actin/spectrin-based cytoskeleton, ultimately serving to establish stable membrane expression for interacting proteins. The family is comprised of three members encoded by distinct genes: ankyrin-R (encoded by ANK1), ankyrin-B (encoded by ANK2), and ankyrin-G (encoded be ANK3). Ankyrin isoforms are expressed throughout the body, including kidney, lung, brain, skeletal muscle, and heart with ankyrin-R showing the most restricted expression, being found primarily in erythrocytes with secondary expression in muscle and neurons. Ankyrin-B and -G, on the other hand, are ubiquitously expressed, including in myocytes throughout the cardiac conduction system [13,14] and are the focus of our discussion here.

Canonical ankyrins are composed of four domains termed the membrane-binding domain (MBD), the spectrin-binding domain (SBD), the death domain (DD), and the C-terminal domain (CTD) (Figure 2) [15]. The MBD does not interact directly with the cell membrane but instead is primarily the site of interaction with membrane-bound proteins and is defined by a series of stacked α-helices coupled by β-hairpin loops (24 ANK repeats) [16], which generate specific binding pockets for membrane associated proteins. Importantly, and particularly relevant for its role as a multimodal regulator of cellular excitability, the MBD allows for simultaneous interaction with a number of membrane proteins facilitating formation of large protein complexes. Despite significant sequence homology of the MBD across ankyrin isoforms, isoform-specific protein-protein interactions are achieved at least in part through distinct subcellular localization profiles. In cardiac myocytes for example, ankyrin-B localizes to T-tubules, the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR), and lateral plasma membrane [17], while ankyrin-G is found primarily at the intercalated disc membrane where neighboring cells are electrically and mechanically coupled [18]. As its name implies, the SBD is the site for interaction with β-spectrin isoforms, linking ankyrin with the actin-based cytoskeleton to stabilize large protein complexes [19]. The last two domains (DD and CTD) are collectively referred to as the regulatory domain for their role in modulating ankyrin interactions. Residues within this domain are important for intermolecular interactions and localization of associated membrane proteins [20,21,22]. Moreover, the majority of disease-causing mutations in ankyrin genes are located within the regulatory domain, supporting the central role of ankyrins as hubs for macromolecular complexes [23]. While the many associated mutations in ankyrin have allowed identification of its interacting partners and functional impacts [14,23], it is critical to realize that acquired states of heart disease associate with reductions in ankyrin expression, suggesting that disruption of each of these interacting partners can be impacted by loss in ankyrin expression [24,25,26,27]. While this provides a strong rationale for understanding the pathologic remodeling of electrical activity in the diseased heart, it also illustrates the profound therapeutic potential that may exist in achieving ways of preserving ankyrin expression. Currently, it is unclear what mechanisms account for the observed loss in ankyrin expression with disease, whether it is a transcriptionally mediated response, or pathways affecting protein stability and/or localization. Undoubtedly, however, unraveling such mechanisms with the intent to preserve ankyrin expression in heart disease will represent a therapeutic approach with significant and wide reaching implications for many of the observed states of electrical disruptions. The following discussion of what these interacting partners are and their consequence on heart rate and rhythm will hopefully illustrate the profound role these cytoskeletal proteins serve in maintaining proper cardiac electrical activity.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Structure of canonical ankyrin and major interacting proteins organized by site of interaction for ankyrin-B and ankyrin-G.

3.1. Ankyrin-B

Ankyrin-B is expressed within the nodal cells, the cardiac conduction system, and atrial and ventricular myocytes, where it interacts with several channels and transporters important for Ca2+ handling in cardiomyocytes, including the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX), Na+/K+ ATPase (NKA) and inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate receptor (IP3R) [15,28] as well as the protein phosphatase, PP2A (Figure 2 and Figure 3) [29,30]. In SAN myocytes, ankyrin-B has also been found to associate with Cav1.3, a predominantly neuronal L-type Ca2+ channel that is an important determinant of spontaneous diastolic depolarization phase of the SAN action potential [31]. A human variant in ankyrin-B was first identified in a proband with prolongation of the QT interval on the electrocardiogram together with ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death, leading to the initial link to long QT syndrome (LQT type 4) [32]. It is now appreciated that loss of ankyrin-B function produces a complex phenotype (termed ‘ankyrin-B syndrome’) including SAN, atrial, and ventricular defects [31,33,34]. Relevant to the cardiac conduction system, loss of ankyrin-B leads to aberrant SAN myocyte excitability and pacemaking, displayed by severe bradycardia and rate variability, secondary to defects in Ca2+ cycling and loss of Cav1.3 membrane targeting [31]. Ankyrin-B dysfunction also induces inappropriate afterdepolarizations, structural remodeling and arrhythmia in the atria with increased susceptibility to atrial fibrillation, ventricular fibrillation, [34,35] and has even been associated with WPW syndrome [36]. More recently, a loss-of-function mutation in ankyrin-B was identified in a patient with severe arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and sudden death [37]. The diversity of these phenotypes is likely the result of ankyrin-B mutations disrupting expression in subregions of the heart or subsets of interacting partners, while more complete disruption of ankyrin-B through heterologous knockdown in mice recapitulates a more comprehensive set of phenotypes [17,35,38,39,40].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Ankyrin-B/spectrin-based macromolecular complexes for regulation of pacemaking and membrane excitability in cardiac myocytes. Ankyrin-B (AnkB) associates primarily with βI and αI or αII-spectrin at the lateral membrane to target the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) and Na+/K+ ATPase and, in sinoatrial node cells only, the voltage-gated Ca2+ channel Cav1.3. AnkB also associates with αII- and βII-spectrin to regulate proteins at the cardiac dyad formed at the juxtaposition of the t-tubule (location of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel Cav1.2) and sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) membranes. Importantly, this AnkB/spectrin-based complex is important for regulation of Ca2+ cycling by the protein phosphatase PP2A, in part through modulation of the SR Ca2+ release channel RyR2.

Beyond transgenic models investigating variants or knockdown, ankyrin-B has also been identified to experience protein loss in human ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure, leading to concomitant loss in binding partners like NKA [25]. The protease inhibitor calpain has been found to preserve ankyrin-B and NKA at the border zone in a mouse model of ischemia-reperfusion and reduce infarct size. Thus, defects in ankyrin-B function give rise to a diverse array of abnormal excitability throughout multiple locales of the cardiac conduction system with important implications for human disease.

3.2. Ankyrin-G

Ankyrin-G organizes macromolecular complexes to support conduction of the electrical impulse in neuronal and cardiac tissue, primarily through its association with voltage-gated Na+ channels (Nav) [41,42,43,44]. Specifically, ankyrin-G binds directly to a conserved motif found in DII-DIII linker of several Nav α-subunits, including the predominant cardiac isoform Nav1.5. Ankyrin-G and Nav1.5 colocalize primarily at the intercalated disc membrane important for electrical and mechanical communication between neighboring myocytes with secondary expression at t-tubules or lateral membrane (Figure 2 and Figure 4). A host of loss-of-function mutations have been identified in SCN5A (encodes Nav1.5) and linked to a wide range of cardiac conduction disorders, including sick sinus syndrome, cardiac conduction disease, atrial fibrillation, and Brugada syndrome [11,45,46,47,48]. Beyond direct defects in Nav1.5, mutations in a large number of accessory proteins, including β-subunits, adapter, cytoskeletal and regulatory proteins, have been linked to cardiac conduction disorders and arrhythmia [49,50,51]. Relevant to ankyrins, a human mutation in the ankyrin-binding motif in Nav1.5 (E1053K) disrupts ankyrin-G/Nav1.5 interaction giving rise to loss of Nav1.5 membrane targeting and abnormal channel function. Specifically, HA-tagged E1053K Nav1.5 expressed in ventricular myocytes show minimal membrane surface expression compared to HA-tagged WT Nav1.5, which express readily at intercalated disc and t-tubule domains. Studies in heterologous cells support that the trafficking defect is likely not due to alterations in Nav1.5 folding or stability. Interestingly, the E1053K mutation is associated with Brugada syndrome, characterized by potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias with specific ECG abnormalities in the absence of structural heart disease [43]. Cardiac-specific deletion of ankyrin-G in mice gives rise to loss of Nav1.5 membrane expression and activity with pronounced bradycardia together with evidence of atrial and ventricular conduction slowing at baseline and increased susceptibility to AV block and ventricular arrhythmia following flecainide challenge [18].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Ankyrin-G/spectrin-based macromolecular complexes at the cardiomyocyte intercalated disc. Ankyrin-G (AnkG) is found primarily at the cardiomyocyte intercalated disc with αII and βIV-spectrin in a macromolecular complex for regulation of the voltage-gated Na+ channel Nav1.5 by Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII). A subpopulation of the protein phosphatase PP2A is also targeted by AnkG/spectrin for modulation of Nav1.5 activity (not pictured). βIV-spectrin also associates with the two-pore domain K+ channel TREK-1 at the intercalated disc in an AnkG-independent manner.

Beyond direct interaction with Nav1.5, ankyrin-G has been proposed to regulate cardiac conduction through association with mechanical adhesion proteins at the intercalated disc. While electrical coupling is supported by gap junctions comprised of connexin family members (Cx40, Cx45, and/or Cx43 in different layers of the conduction system), mechanical coupling and structural stabilization is provided by adherens junctions and desmosomes. Plakophilin, desmoplakin, and desmin are examples of desmosomal proteins that depend on ankyrin-G for proper expression and localization at the intercalated disc [52], which may explain development of dilated cardiomyopathy in cardiac-specific ankyrin-G knockout mice [18].

4. Spectrins in the Cardiac Conduction System

Spectrin is a critical component of the cytoskeleton in a broad distribution of metazoan cell types, including erythrocytes, neurons, beta cells, epithelial cells and cardiac myocytes [7,8]. Spectrin assembles as a heterotetramer of α- and β-subunits to form an extended chain to provide support for fragile membranes and effectively link membrane proteins/lipids to the actin-based cytoskeleton. Mammals express 2 α- and 5 β-subunits with αI, αII, βI, βII and βIV detected to varying degrees in cardiac myocytes. Canonical α-spectrin is comprised of 20 triple-helical repeats (spectrin repeats) and a C-terminal calmodulin-related domain (Figure 2). β-spectrin consists of a conserved N-terminal actin-binding region, multiple spectrin repeats (17 for every isoform except for βV-spectrin that has 30), and a C-terminal domain with multiple signaling motifs. Interaction with ankyrins occurs through a motif in β-spectrin repeat 15 that is highly conserved across isoforms. As discussed for ankyrin, isoform-specific macromolecular complexes are achieved at least in part through distinct subcellular localization profiles of ankyrins and spectrins. There is growing appreciation for the multifunctional nature of spectrin family members beyond providing structural support for the cell membrane. For example, spectrins support long-range cellular communication involving, in part, coordination of signaling nanodomains for ion channels [42,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60]. More recently, it has been discovered that spectrins modulate gene expression to control remodeling of cell function in response to chronic stress stimuli, although the precise mechanisms remain to be determined [61,62,63]. Thus, spectrins have evolved to serve a host of unique challenges faced by metazoan cells.

Cardiomyocytes express several different spectrin isoforms with distinct subcellular localization profiles, similar to the situation for the different ankyrin isoforms. αII-spectrin is widely expressed at membrane domains throughout the myocyte, while αI-spectrin is mostly restricted to lateral membranes (Figure 3 and Figure 4). In contrast, β-spectrins appear to be more domain specific with βI-spectrin found mostly at the lateral membrane, βII-spectrin at the z-line in close proximity to sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) and t-tubule membranes (secondary expression at intercalated disc), and βIV–spectrin almost exclusively expressed at intercalated disc membrane (Figure 4).

Several reports have identified loss of function mutations in SPTAN1 [64] and SPTBN4 [65,66,67] in patients displaying a wide spectrum of neurodevelopmental phenotypes, central deafness, and motor dysfunction. While cardiac phenotypes have not been reported in these patients, studies in mice with similar loss of function result in both electrical and structural phenotypes associated with altered ion channel localization and expression (described below). It is possible that the severity of other neurological phenotypes overshadow cardiac complications in these patients. At the same time, a human mutation in ANK2 has been shown to alter interaction with βII-spectrin resulting in severe cardiac arrhythmia [68], supporting a role for spectrin proteins in human cardiac pathophysiology.

4.1. αII-Spectrin

αII-spectrin (encoded by SPTAN1) is expressed in tissues throughout the body, including heart. Within the cardiomyocyte, αII-spectrin is found at lateral membranes, z-lines and the intercalated disc membrane [69]. Global αII-spectrin knockout in mice is embryonic lethal with pronounced malformation of multiple tissues including heart [70]. Cardiac-specific αII-spectrin knockout mice, on the other hand, are viable but show defects in cardiac electrical and mechanical function with evidence of conduction disturbances in the atria and ventricles [71]. αII-spectrin deficient myocytes show a significant decrease in INa together with similar decrease in transient outward K+ current Ito. Interestingly, the cytoskeleton regulatory proteins Mena and VASP have been reported to interact with a specific αII-spectrin splice variant (SH3i) at z-line and intercalated disc [72]. Double deficiency of Mena and VASP leads to loss of structural integrity of these critical membrane domains and evidence of intra-atrial and intra-ventricular conduction slowing [72].

4.2. βII-Spectrin

Similar to αII-spectrin, βII-spectrin (encoded by SPTBN1) is widely distributed in tissues throughout the body and is the predominant β-spectrin isoform found in cardiomyocytes. βII-spectrin associates with a host of critical ion channels, transporters and regulatory molecules through its interaction with ankyrin-B (discussed previously). Global deletion of β®II-spectrin in mice is embryonic lethal reflecting its wide distribution and important role in development [73]. Cardiac-specific βII-spectrin knockout mice are viable with pronounced ventricular arrhythmia and even sudden death following acute catecholaminergic challenge [68]. Interestingly and relevant to the discussion of the cardiac conduction system, in addition to ventricular arrhythmias and remodeling, βII-deficient mice show bradycardia at baseline with increased heart rate variability and episodes of AV block. At the myocyte level, βII-spectrin deficiency induces abnormal intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis with increased frequency of inappropriate, spontaneous SR Ca2+ release events and action potential afterdepolarizations that serve as potential arrhythmia triggers. Altered myocyte Ca2+ handling and excitability is likely related to loss in expression/membrane targeting of ankyrin-B and associated transporters NCX and NKA. Interestingly, βII-deficient myocytes also showed disorganized RyR2 subcellular localization and decreased RyR2 expression, although the mechanism remains unknown.

4.3. βIV-Spectrin

βIV-spectrin (encoded by SPTBN4) is highly expressed in brain and plays a critical role with ankyrin-G in Nav clustering at axon initial segments and nodes of Ranvier [74,75,76]. Thus loss of βIV-spectrin function is associated with defects in neuronal excitability in mice with prominent ataxia. In cardiomyocytes, βIV-spectrin is expressed almost exclusively at the intercalated disc membrane [18,55]. As in neurons, βIV-spectrin associates with ankyrin-G and Nav (primarily Nav1.5) to orchestrate a platform for regulation of myocyte membrane excitability. While βIV-spectrin is required for proper membrane targeting of Nav in neurons, loss of βIV-spectrin in myocytes does not affect membrane expression but rather disrupts channel regulation. Specifically, βIV-spectrin binds directly to Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) and targets a kinase subpopulation with ankyrin-G/Nav1.5 at the intercalated disc. CaMKII phosphorylates Nav1.5 to modulate channel gating and the level of pathogenic so-called late current (INa,L). Loss of β®IV-spectrin/CaMKII interaction prevents CaMKII-dependent phosphorylation of Nav1.5 at a specific residue in the DI-DII linker (Ser571) and abrogates stress-induced potentiation of INa,L [55,77,78]. Mutant mice expressing truncated βIV-spectrin lacking the CaMKII binding domain (qv3J mice) show normal excitability at baseline with resistance to sinus pause and premature ventricular contractions induced by acute adrenergic challenge.

More recently, it was discovered that βIV-spectrin also regulates the cardiac conduction system through association with the two-pore domain K+ channel TREK-1 in cardiac myocytes. TREK-1 function has been well characterized in the nervous system with identified roles in nociception and depression phenotypes [79]. The channel is also expressed in heart across species, including mice and human [57,80,81,82,83]. Interestingly, βIV-spectrin is required for normal TREK-1 membrane expression in SAN and ventricular myocytes. Furthermore, loss of βIV-spectrin/TREK-1 interaction does not impact basal heart rate or conduction but promotes a dramatic increase in sinus pause in response to adrenergic stimulation. Consistent with this phenotype, cardiac-specific knockout of TREK-1 results in R-R prolongation, QTc prolongation, and increased incidence of sinus pause without major changes in baseline echocardiography features [75]. Notably, isolated SAN cells from these mice exhibit rapid spontaneous action potential firing, faster diastolic depolarization rate, depolarized maximum diastolic potential, and longer AP duration at 50% repolarization compared to SAN cells isolated from wildtype (WT) mice. TREK-1 has also been linked to defects in AV node conduction through its association with members of the Popeye domain containing (POPDC) family of cAMP effector proteins [84], implying a broader role for the channel in regulating function of the cardiac conduction system.

5. Conclusions

The cardiac conduction system is a heterogeneous collection of excitable tissues that govern generation and coordinated spread of electrical activation through the heart. Differential expression of ion channels is an important determinant of the precise sequence of events beginning with impulse generation in the SAN and ending with rapid spread of the activation wavefront through the ventricles. Defects in ion channel expression/function in myocytes throughout the conduction system have been linked to arrhythmia. More recently, there is growing interest in the important role for cytoskeletal and adapter proteins in organizing macromolecular complexes for regulation of ion channels and membrane excitability. While important gaps remain in our understanding of the dynamic role of the myocyte cytoskeleton, ankyrin and spectrin family members provide a clue about how these proteins function to regulate cardiac conduction and pathophysiology.

Ankyrins and spectrins work together to arrange macromolecular complexes important for regulation of action potential generation and propagation. Although a precise characterization of expression patterns is lacking, ankyrin and spectrin isoforms have been identified in myocytes throughout the conduction system with distinct roles through isoform specific interactions with a host of ion channels, transporters and regulatory molecules. Given that ankyrins show high degree of homology across key functional domains (same for spectrins), isoform-specific interactions are likely determined by distinct subcellular distribution for each family member. For example, ankyrin-B is found at distinct subcellular domains (lateral membranes, t-tubules) where it organizes macromolecular complexes important for normal Ca2+ homeostasis. Thus, defects in ankyrin-B-based pathways primarily impact cardiac pacemaking, and atrial and ventricular arrhythmia (mostly through increased likelihood of arrhythmia triggers, as opposed to conduction defects). On the other hand, ankyrin-G is found primarily at the myocyte intercalated disc with Nav1.5 to regulate membrane excitability. Arrhythmias related to defects in ankyrin-G/Nav1.5 are more closely associated with depressed excitability, slow conduction, or even block (exit block in case of SSS). Spectrins bind directly to ankyrin to link macromolecular complexes to the actin cytoskeleton and/or expand the functionality of these complexes by recruiting additional regulatory proteins. An important emerging role for spectrin family members is in modulation of gene expression through association with signaling pathways and transcription factors. For example, βIV-spectrin is found primarily at the cardiac intercalated disc with ankyrin-G/Nav1.5 but is not required for normal membrane targeting of the complex [18,55]. Instead, βIV-spectrin is responsible for recruiting CaMKII for regulation of Nav1.5 in response to adrenergic stress. Furthermore, βIV-spectrin binds directly to the transcription factor STAT3 providing a direct link between integrity of the cytoskeleton and gene expression [61,62]. A similar role has been identified for βII-spectrin in crosstalk with TGF- β signaling [68,73]. It is interesting to consider the possibility that spectrins have evolved to link integrity of macromolecular complexes at the membrane to gene programs important for adaptation to stress in myocytes throughout the conduction system.

Although the field has learned a great deal about control of cardiac impulse generation and propagation from studying ankyrin and spectrin family members, important questions remain. What lessons from ankyrins/spectrins may be extended to other cytoskeletal proteins (e.g., dystrophin or nuclear cytoskeletal proteins EMD and lamin [5])? How do acquired/inherited defects in cytoskeletal proteins manifest in cardiac pacemaking and/or conduction defects? What is the relationship between acute/chronic stress, status of the cytoskeleton and association proteins, myocyte gene expression and, ultimately, conduction? Can this knowledge be leveraged to precisely tune specific components of the conduction system? Going forward, it is anticipated that answers to these questions will lead to novel therapies to help the many human patients suffering from cardiac conduction disorders around the world.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health, grant numbers R01-HL135096, R01-HL134824, and R01-HL156652. The APC was funded by MDPI.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Raatikainen M.J.P., Arnar D.O., Merkely B., Nielsen J.C., Hindricks G., Heidbuchel H., Camm J. A decade of information on the use of cardiac implantable electronic devices and interventional electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology Countries: 2017 report from the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace. 2017;19:ii1–ii90. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dobrzynski H., Anderson R.H., Atkinson A., Borbas Z., D’Souza A., Fraser J.F., Inada S., Logantha S.J., Monfredi O., Morris G.M., et al. Structure, function and clinical relevance of the cardiac conduction system, including the atrioventricular ring and outflow tract tissues. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013;139:260–288. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mesirca P., Fedorov V.V., Hund T.J., Torrente A.G., Bidaud I., Mohler P.J., Mangoni M.E. Pharmacologic approach to sinoatrial node dysfunction. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2021;61:757–778. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-031120-115815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.He B.J., Boyden P., Scheinman M. Ventricular arrhythmias involving the His-Purkinje system in the structurally abnormal heart. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2018;41:1051–1059. doi: 10.1111/pace.13465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Park D.S., Fishman G.I. The cardiac conduction system. Circulation. 2011;123:904–915. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.942284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mohler P.J., Wehrens X.H. Mechanisms of human arrhythmia syndromes: Abnormal cardiac macromolecular interactions. Physiology. 2007;22:342–350. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00018.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bennett V., Baines A.J. Spectrin and ankyrin-based pathways: Metazoan inventions for integrating cells into tissues. Physiol. Rev. 2001;81:1353–1392. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.3.1353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Unudurthi S.D., Greer-Short A., Patel N., Nassal D., Hund T.J. Spectrin-based pathways underlying electrical and mechanical dysfunction in cardiac disease. Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2018;16:59–65. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2018.1418664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Grimes K.M., Prasad V., McNamara J.W. Supporting the heart: Functions of the cardiomyocyte’s non-sarcomeric cytoskeleton. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2019;131:187–196. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2019.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Abriel H., Rougier J.S., Jalife J. Ion channel macromolecular complexes in cardiomyocytes: Roles in sudden cardiac death. Circ. Res. 2015;116:1971–1988. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.305017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Benson D.W., Wang D.W., Dyment M., Knilans T.K., Fish F.A., Strieper M.J., Rhodes T.H., George A.L., Jr. Congenital sick sinus syndrome caused by recessive mutations in the cardiac sodium channel gene (SCN5A) J. Clin. Invest. 2003;112:1019–1028. doi: 10.1172/JCI200318062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mangrum J.M., DiMarco J.P. The evaluation and management of bradycardia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;342:703–709. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200003093421006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bennett V., Chen L. Ankyrins and cellular targeting of diverse membrane proteins to physiological sites. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 2001;13:61–67. doi: 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00175-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cunha S.R., Mohler P.J. Cardiac ankyrins: Essential components for development and maintenance of excitable membrane domains in heart. Cardiovasc. Res. 2006;71:22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hashemi S.M., Hund T.J., Mohler P.J. Cardiac ankyrins in health and disease. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2009;47:203–209. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Michaely P., Tomchick D.R., Machius M., Anderson R.G. Crystal structure of a 12 ANK repeat stack from human ankyrinR. EMBO J. 2002;21:6387–6396. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Curran J., Mohler P.J. Coordinating electrical activity of the heart: Ankyrin polypeptides in human cardiac disease. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2011;15:789–801. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2011.575363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Makara M.A., Curran J., Little S.C., Musa H., Polina I., Smith S.A., Wright P.J., Unudurthi S.D., Snyder J., Bennett V., et al. Ankyrin-G coordinates intercalated disc signaling platform to regulate cardiac excitability in vivo. Circ. Res. 2014;115:929–938. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.305154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bennett V., Stenbuck P.J. Identification and partial purification of ankyrin, the high affinity membrane attachment site for human erythrocyte spectrin. J. Biol. Chem. 1979;254:2533–2541. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)30254-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hall T.G., Bennett V. Regulatory domains of erythrocyte ankyrin. J. Biol. Chem. 1987;262:10537–10545. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)60995-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Davis L.H., Davis J.Q., Bennett V. Ankyrin regulation: An alternatively spliced segment of the regulatory domain functions as an intramolecular modulator. J. Biol. Chem. 1992;267:18966–18972. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)37055-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mohler P.J., Yoon W., Bennett V. Ankyrin-B targets beta2-spectrin to an intracellular compartment in neonatal cardiomyocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:40185–40193. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406018200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Smith S., Curran J., Hund T.J., Mohler P.J. Defects in cytoskeletal signaling pathways, arrhythmia, and sudden cardiac death. Front. Physiol. 2012;3:122. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hund T.J., Wright P.J., Dun W., Snyder J.S., Boyden P.A., Mohler P.J. Regulation of the ankyrin-B-based targeting pathway following myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc. Res. 2009;81:742–749. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvn348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kashef F., Li J., Wright P., Snyder J., Suliman F., Kilic A., Higgins R.S., Anderson M.E., Binkley P.F., Hund T.J., et al. Ankyrin-B protein in heart failure: Identification of a new component of metazoan cardioprotection. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:30268–30281. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.368415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dun W., Lowe J.S., Wright P., Hund T.J., Mohler P.J., Boyden P.A. Ankyrin-G participates in INa remodeling in myocytes from the border zones of infarcted canine heart. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e78087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Makara M.A., Curran J., Lubbers E.R., Murphy N.P., Little S.C., Musa H., Smith S.A., Unudurthi S.D., Rajaram M.V.S., Janssen P.M.L., et al. Novel mechanistic roles for Ankyrin-G in cardiac remodeling and heart failure. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2018;3:675–689. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2018.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sucharski H.C., Dudley E.K., Keith C.B.R., El Refaey M., Koenig S.N., Mohler P.J. Mechanisms and alterations of cardiac ion channels leading to disease: Role of Ankyrin-B in cardiac function. Biomolecules. 2020;10:211. doi: 10.3390/biom10020211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cunha S.R., Mohler P.J. Obscurin targets ankyrin-B and protein phosphatase 2A to the cardiac M-line. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:31968–31980. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806050200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bhasin N., Cunha S.R., Mduannayake M., Gigena M.S., Rogers T.B., Mohler P.J. Molecular basis for PP2A regulatory subunit B56 alpha targeting in cardiomyocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2007;293:H109–H119. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00059.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Le Scouarnec S., Bhasin N., Vieyres C., Hund T.J., Cunha S.R., Koval O., Marionneau C., Chen B., Wu Y., Demolombe S., et al. Dysfunction in ankyrin-B-dependent ion channel and transporter targeting causes human sinus node disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:15617–15622. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805500105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mohler P.J., Schott J.J., Gramolini A.O., Dilly K.W., Guatimosim S., duBell W.H., Song L.S., Haurogne K., Kyndt F., Ali M.E., et al. Ankyrin-B mutation causes type 4 long-QT cardiac arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. Nature. 2003;421:634–639. doi: 10.1038/nature01335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mohler P.J., Le Scouarnec S., Denjoy I., Lowe J.S., Guicheney P., Caron L., Driskell I.M., Schott J.J., Norris K., Leenhardt A., et al. Defining the cellular phenotype of “ankyrin-B syndrome” variants: Human ANK2 variants associated with clinical phenotypes display a spectrum of activities in cardiomyocytes. Circulation. 2007;115:432–441. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.656512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cunha S.R., Hund T.J., Hashemi S., Voigt N., Li N., Wright P., Koval O., Li J., Gudmundsson H., Gumina R.J., et al. Defects in ankyrin-based membrane protein targeting pathways underlie atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2011;124:1212–1222. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.023986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wolf R.M., Glynn P., Hashemi S., Zarei K., Mitchell C.C., Anderson M.E., Mohler P.J., Hund T.J. Atrial fibrillation and sinus node dysfunction in human ankyrin-B syndrome: A computational analysis. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2013;304:H1253–H1266. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00734.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Coban-Akdemir Z.H., Charng W.L., Azamian M., Paine I.S., Punetha J., Grochowski C.M., Gambin T., Valdes S.O., Cannon B., Zapata G., et al. Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: De novo variants and evidence for mutational burden in genes associated with atrial fibrillation. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2020;182:1387–1399. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Roberts J.D., Murphy N.P., Hamilton R.M., Lubbers E.R., James C.A., Kline C.F., Gollob M.H., Krahn A.D., Sturm A.C., Musa H., et al. Ankyrin-B dysfunction predisposes to arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and is amenable to therapy. J. Clin. Invest. 2019;129:3171–3184. doi: 10.1172/JCI125538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Skogestad J., Aronsen J.M., Tovsrud N., Wanichawan P., Hougen K., Stokke M.K., Carlson C.R., Sjaastad I., Sejersted O.M., Swift F. Coupling of the Na+/K+-ATPase to Ankyrin B controls Na+/Ca2+ exchanger activity in cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020;116:78–90. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Camors E., Mohler P.J., Bers D.M., Despa S. Ankyrin-B reduction enhances Ca spark-mediated SR Ca release promoting cardiac myocyte arrhythmic activity. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2012;52:1240–1248. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chu L., Greenstein J.L., Winslow R.L. Na(+) microdomains and sparks: Role in cardiac excitation-contraction coupling and arrhythmias in ankyrin-B deficiency. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2019;128:145–157. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2019.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhou D., Lambert S., Malen P.L., Carpenter S., Boland L.M., Bennett V. AnkyrinG is required for clustering of voltage-gated Na channels at axon initial segments and for normal action potential firing. J. Cell. Biol. 1998;143:1295–1304. doi: 10.1083/jcb.143.5.1295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jenkins S.M., Bennett V. Ankyrin-G coordinates assembly of the spectrin-based membrane skeleton, voltage-gated sodium channels, and L1 CAMs at Purkinje neuron initial segments. J. Cell. Biol. 2001;155:739–746. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200109026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mohler P.J., Rivolta I., Napolitano C., LeMaillet G., Lambert S., Priori S.G., Bennett V. Nav1.5 E1053K mutation causing Brugada syndrome blocks binding to ankyrin-G and expression of Nav1.5 on the surface of cardiomyocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:17533–17538. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403711101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lowe J.S., Palygin O., Bhasin N., Hund T.J., Boyden P.A., Shibata E., Anderson M.E., Mohler P.J. Voltage-gated Nav channel targeting in the heart requires an ankyrin-G dependent cellular pathway. J. Cell. Biol. 2008;180:173–186. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200710107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Abriel H. Roles and regulation of the cardiac sodium channel Na v 1.5: Recent insights from experimental studies. Cardiovasc. Res. 2007;76:381–389. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kapplinger J.D., Tester D.J., Alders M., Benito B., Berthet M., Brugada J., Brugada P., Fressart V., Guerchicoff A., Harris-Kerr C., et al. An international compendium of mutations in the SCN5A-encoded cardiac sodium channel in patients referred for Brugada syndrome genetic testing. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7:33–46. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.09.069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Calloe K., Refaat M.M., Grubb S., Wojciak J., Campagna J., Thomsen N.M., Nussbaum R.L., Scheinman M.M., Schmitt N. Characterization and mechanisms of action of novel NaV1.5 channel mutations associated with Brugada syndrome. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2013;6:177–184. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.112.974220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ellinor P.T., Nam E.G., Shea M.A., Milan D.J., Ruskin J.N., MacRae C.A. Cardiac sodium channel mutation in atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5:99–105. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Olesen M.S., Jespersen T., Nielsen J.B., Liang B., Moller D.V., Hedley P., Christiansen M., Varro A., Olesen S.P., Haunso S., et al. Mutations in sodium channel beta-subunit SCN3B are associated with early-onset lone atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc. Res. 2011;89:786–793. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvq348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Watanabe H., Darbar D., Kaiser D.W., Jiramongkolchai K., Chopra S., Donahue B.S., Kannankeril P.J., Roden D.M. Mutations in sodium channel beta1- and beta2-subunits associated with atrial fibrillation. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2009;2:268–275. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.779181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rivaud M.R., Delmar M., Remme C.A. Heritable arrhythmia syndromes associated with abnormal cardiac sodium channel function: Ionic and non-ionic mechanisms. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020;116:1557–1570. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cerrone M., Delmar M. Desmosomes and the sodium channel complex: Implications for arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and Brugada syndrome. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2014;24:184–190. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2014.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yang Y., Lacas-Gervais S., Morest D.K., Solimena M., Rasband M.N. BetaIV spectrins are essential for membrane stability and the molecular organization of nodes of Ranvier. J. Neurosci. 2004;24:7230–7240. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2125-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lacas-Gervais S., Guo J., Strenzke N., Scarfone E., Kolpe M., Jahkel M., De Camilli P., Moser T., Rasband M.N., Solimena M. BetaIVSigma1 spectrin stabilizes the nodes of Ranvier and axon initial segments. J. Cell. Biol. 2004;166:983–990. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200408007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hund T.J., Koval O.M., Li J., Wright P.J., Qian L., Snyder J.S., Gudmundsson H., Kline C.F., Davidson N.P., Cardona N., et al. A betaIV spectrin/CaMKII signaling complex is essential for membrane excitability in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2010;120:3508–3519. doi: 10.1172/JCI43621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bennett V., Stenbuck P.J. The membrane attachment protein for spectrin is associated with band 3 in human erythrocyte membranes. Nature. 1979;280:468–473. doi: 10.1038/280468a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hund T.J., Snyder J.S., Wu X., Glynn P., Koval O.M., Onal B., Leymaster N.D., Unudurthi S.D., Curran J., Camardo C., et al. betaIV-Spectrin regulates TREK-1 membrane targeting in the heart. Cardiovasc. Res. 2014;102:166–175. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvu008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kline C.F., Wright P.J., Koval O.M., Zmuda E.J., Johnson B.L., Anderson M.E., Hai T., Hund T.J., Mohler P.J. betaIV-Spectrin and CaMKII facilitate Kir6.2 regulation in pancreatic beta cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:17576–17581. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314195110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Komada M., Soriano P. BetaIV-spectrin regulates sodium channel clustering through ankyrin-G at axon initial segments and nodes of Ranvier. J. Cell. Biol. 2002;156:337–348. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200110003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sikorski A.F., Sangerman J., Goodman S.R., Critz S.D. Spectrin (betaSpIIsigma1) is an essential component of synaptic transmission. Brain Res. 2000;852:161–166. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(99)02253-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Patel N.J., Nassal D.M., Greer-Short A.D., Unudurthi S.D., Scandling B.W., Gratz D., Xu X., Kalyanasundaram A., Fedorov V.V., Accornero F., et al. betaIV-Spectrin/STAT3 complex regulates fibroblast phenotype, fibrosis, and cardiac function. JCI Insight. 2019;4:e131046. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.131046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Unudurthi S.D., Nassal D., Greer-Short A., Patel N., Howard T., Xu X., Onal B., Satroplus T., Hong D., Lane C., et al. betaIV-Spectrin regulates STAT3 targeting to tune cardiac response to pressure overload. J. Clin. Investig. 2018;128:5561–5572. doi: 10.1172/JCI99245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lambert M.W. Nuclear alpha spectrin: Critical roles in DNA interstrand cross-link repair and genomic stability. Exp. Biol. Med. 2016;241:1621–1638. doi: 10.1177/1535370216662714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Syrbe S., Harms F.L., Parrini E., Montomoli M., Mutze U., Helbig K.L., Polster T., Albrecht B., Bernbeck U., van Binsbergen E., et al. Delineating SPTAN1 associated phenotypes: From isolated epilepsy to encephalopathy with progressive brain atrophy. Brain. 2017;140:2322–2336. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Knierim E., Gill E., Seifert F., Morales-Gonzalez S., Unudurthi S.D., Hund T.J., Stenzel W., Schuelke M. A recessive mutation in beta-IV-spectrin (SPTBN4) associates with congenital myopathy, neuropathy, and central deafness. Hum. Genet. 2017;136:903–910. doi: 10.1007/s00439-017-1814-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wang C.C., Ortiz-Gonzalez X.R., Yum S.W., Gill S.M., White A., Kelter E., Seaver L.H., Lee S., Wiley G., Kelter E., et al. bIV spectrinopathies cause profound intellectual disability, congenital hypotonia, and motor axonal neuropathy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2018;102:1158–1168. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hausler M.G., Begemann M., Lidov H.G., Kurth I., Darras B.T., Elbracht M. A novel homozygous splice-site mutation in the SPTBN4 gene causes axonal neuropathy without intellectual disability. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2020;63:103826. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.103826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Smith S.A., Sturm A.C., Curran J., Kline C.F., Little S.C., Bonilla I.M., Long V.P., Makara M., Polina I., Hughes L.D., et al. Dysfunction in the betaII spectrin-dependent cytoskeleton underlies human arrhythmia. Circulation. 2015;131:695–708. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Baines A.J., Pinder J.C. The spectrin-associated cytoskeleton in mammalian heart. Front. Biosci. 2005;10:3020–3033. doi: 10.2741/1759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Stankewich M.C., Cianci C.D., Stabach P.R., Ji L., Nath A., Morrow J.S. Cell organization, growth, and neural and cardiac development require alphaII-spectrin. J. Cell. Sci. 2011;124:3956–3966. doi: 10.1242/jcs.080374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lubbers E.R., Murphy N.P., Musa H., Huang C.Y., Gupta R., Price M.V., Han M., Daoud E., Gratz D., El Refaey M., et al. Defining new mechanistic roles for alphaII spectrin in cardiac function. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294:9576–9591. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Benz P.M., Merkel C.J., Offner K., Abesser M., Ullrich M., Fischer T., Bayer B., Wagner H., Gambaryan S., Ursitti J.A., et al. Mena/VASP and alphaII-Spectrin complexes regulate cytoplasmic actin networks in cardiomyocytes and protect from conduction abnormalities and dilated cardiomyopathy. Cell. Commun. Signal. 2013;11:56. doi: 10.1186/1478-811X-11-56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Tang Y., Katuri V., Dillner A., Mishra B., Deng C.X., Mishra L. Disruption of transforming growth factor-beta signaling in ELF beta-spectrin-deficient mice. Science. 2003;299:574–577. doi: 10.1126/science.1075994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Berghs S., Aggujaro D., Dirkx R., Jr., Maksimova E., Stabach P., Hermel J.M., Zhang J.P., Philbrick W., Slepnev V., Ort T., et al. betaIV spectrin, a new spectrin localized at axon initial segments and nodes of ranvier in the central and peripheral nervous system. J. Cell. Biol. 2000;151:985–1002. doi: 10.1083/jcb.151.5.985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Liu C.H., Stevens S.R., Teliska L.H., Stankewich M., Mohler P.J., Hund T.J., Rasband M.N. Nodal beta spectrins are required to maintain Na(+) channel clustering and axon integrity. eLife. 2020;9:e52378. doi: 10.7554/eLife.52378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Rasband M.N. The axon initial segment and the maintenance of neuronal polarity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010;11:552–562. doi: 10.1038/nrn2852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Glynn P., Musa H., Wu X., Unudurthi S.D., Little S., Qian L., Wright P.J., Radwanski P.B., Gyorke S., Mohler P.J., et al. Voltage-gated sodium channel phosphorylation at Ser571 regulates late current, arrhythmia, and cardiac function in vivo. Circulation. 2015;132:567–577. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.015218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Greer-Short A., Musa H., Alsina K.M., Ni L., Word T.A., Reynolds J.O., Gratz D., Lane C., El-Refaey M., Unudurthi S., et al. Calmodulin kinase II regulates atrial myocyte late sodium current, calcium handling, and atrial arrhythmia. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17:503–511. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Honore E. The neuronal background K2P channels: Focus on TREK1. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007;8:251–261. doi: 10.1038/nrn2117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Unudurthi S.D., Wu X., Qian L., Amari F., Onal B., Li N., Makara M.A., Smith S.A., Snyder J., Fedorov V.V., et al. Two-pore K+ channel TREK-1 regulates sinoatrial node membrane excitability. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e002865. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lugenbiel P., Wenz F., Syren P., Geschwill P., Govorov K., Seyler C., Frank D., Schweizer P.A., Franke J., Weis T., et al. TREK-1 (K2P2.1) K+ channels are suppressed in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure and provide therapeutic targets for rhythm control. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2017;112:8. doi: 10.1007/s00395-016-0597-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Decher N., Ortiz-Bonnin B., Friedrich C., Schewe M., Kiper A.K., Rinne S., Seemann G., Peyronnet R., Zumhagen S., Bustos D., et al. Sodium permeable and "hypersensitive" TREK-1 channels cause ventricular tachycardia. EMBO Mol. Med. 2017;9:403–414. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201606690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Schmidt C., Wiedmann F., Kallenberger S.M., Ratte A., Schulte J.S., Scholz B., Muller F.U., Voigt N., Zafeiriou M.P., Ehrlich J.R., et al. Stretch-activated two-pore-domain (K2P) potassium channels in the heart: Focus on atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2017;130:233–243. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Rinne S., Ortiz-Bonnin B., Stallmeyer B., Kiper A.K., Fortmuller L., Schindler R.F.R., Herbort-Brand U., Kabir N.S., Dittmann S., Friedrich C., et al. POPDC2 a novel susceptibility gene for conduction disorders. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2020;145:74–83. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2020.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES