Skip to main content
Pharmaceuticals logoLink to Pharmaceuticals
. 2021 May 2;14(5):428. doi: 10.3390/ph14050428

Flavonoids from the Genus Euphorbia: Isolation, Structure, Pharmacological Activities and Structure–Activity Relationships

Douglas Kemboi Magozwi 1,2,*, Mmabatho Dinala 1, Nthabiseng Mokwana 1, Xavier Siwe-Noundou 2,*, Rui W M Krause 2, Molahlehi Sonopo 3, Lyndy J McGaw 4, Wilma A Augustyn 1, Vuyelwa Jacqueline Tembu 1,*
Editor: Noelia Duarte
PMCID: PMC8147481  PMID: 34063311

Abstract

Plants of the genus Euphorbia are widely distributed across temperate, tropical and subtropical regions of South America, Asia and Africa with established Ayurvedic, Chinese and Malay ethnomedical records. The present review reports the isolation, occurrence, phytochemistry, biological properties, therapeutic potential and structure–activity relationship of Euphorbia flavonoids for the period covering 2000–2020, while identifying potential areas for future studies aimed at development of new therapeutic agents from these plants. The findings suggest that the extracts and isolated flavonoids possess anticancer, antiproliferative, antimalarial, antibacterial, anti-venom, anti-inflammatory, anti-hepatitis and antioxidant properties and have different mechanisms of action against cancer cells. Of the investigated species, over 80 different types of flavonoids have been isolated to date. Most of the isolated flavonoids were flavonols and comprised simple O-substitution patterns, C-methylation and prenylation. Others had a glycoside, glycosidic linkages and a carbohydrate attached at either C-3 or C-7, and were designated as d-glucose, l-rhamnose or glucorhamnose. The structure–activity relationship studies showed that methylation of the hydroxyl groups on C-3 or C-7 reduces the activities while glycosylation loses the activity and that the parent skeletal structure is essential in retaining the activity. These constituents can therefore offer potential alternative scaffolds towards development of new Euphorbia-based therapeutic agents.

Keywords: Euphorbia, flavonoids, pharmacological activities, structure–activity relationship

1. Introduction

Euphorbia species are used in traditional medicine for the treatment of various diseases. Plants of the Euphorbia genus are common herbs that are applied in the treatment of respiratory diseases, healing of wounds, relieving skin irritations, indigestion, inflammation, microbial infestations and also as a food source [1,2,3,4]. Prehistorical records show that Euphorbia species were used in the treatment of scorpion and snake bites, liver diseases, respiratory disorders, asthma and rheumatism in the Chinese and Ayurveda medicine systems [3,4].

The medicinal applications of these species have been attributed to the presence of diverse secondary metabolites such as flavonoids and terpenes [5,6,7]. The abundance of these chemical constituents in Euphorbia species qualifies them as a rich source of therapeutic natural products possessing various pharmacological activities. These constituents can provide potential lead molecules for drug discovery. The genus Euphorbia is also among the largest of genera in the spurge family, and consists of several other subsections and subgenera, having more than 2000 species [8,9] with promising research potential.

Flavonoids are among the dominant constituents of Euphorbia species after macrocyclic diterpenes and triterpenoids [4,10]. Flavonoids mainly occur as isoflavonoids (3-phenylbenzopyrans), neoflavonoids (4-phenylbenzopyrans), chalcones [7,11], flavonols, flavanone, flavanonol, flavanol and anthocyanidins [11]. These constituents are structurally and biogenetically related as they share a common precursor, the chalcone [11,12]. They have also been reported to possess various pharmacological activities [12,13,14] and have promising therapeutic potential.

Apart from their biological functions in protecting plant species against herbivores and other pathogens as well as acting as stress-protecting agents, they also perform important pharmacological activities in humans. Reports indicate that plant flavonoids exhibit anti-ulcer, antidepressant, antimicrobial, antiviral, antibacterial, anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory, anti-agiogenic [15], antiproliferative [16,17,18,19,20,21,22] and anticancer [6] activities in vitro. Even though they have not been classified as nutrients, the intake of flavonoids is considered to be significant for human health [23]. They are also used as natural dyes as well as for cosmetics and skin-care products [16,24]. Related studies have shown that flavonoids from the Euphorbia species also have a wide range of pharmacological activities such as cytotoxic, anti-inflammatory properties and tumor-promoting abilities [25,26].

Furthermore, various reports have stated the significance of flavonoids in metabolism of the thyroid hormone, which is commonly reported to be vitamin P and is considered useful in counteracting hemorrhage [27]. They are also functional foods for promotion of good health and prevention of diseases [27]. As a result, significant efforts have been made in isolation, identification and characterization of flavonoids from the latex, aerial parts, roots, stems, seeds, stem bark and whole plant extracts of some Euphorbia species since early times [28,29]. Indeed, several reviews have been published about the role and significance of plant flavonoids as a source of bioactive compounds. For instance, in 2019, Avtar and Bhawna [20] reviewed the chemistry and pharmacology of flavonoids, while Dieter [30] reported the significance of flavonoids in plant resistance to microbial attack.

Similarly, Muhammad et al. [7] reviewed the significance of flavonoids as prospective neuroprotectants in ageing associated with neurological disorders, while Ali et al. [31] reported the therapeutic role of flavonoids in bowel diseases. In addition, the role of plant flavonoids in cancer and apoptosis mechanisms was also reported [32], as well as the commercial application of flavonoids as anti-infective agents [14]. Efforts have also been made to review the occurrence of flavonoids in medicinal plants. For example, Bathelemy et al. [33] reported the occurrence, classification and biological activities of flavonoids from African medicinal plants, while Panche et al. [34] and Shashank and Abhay [35] reported the occurrence of flavonoids in selected species of different plant families. In addition, Nigel and Renee [36] reviewed over 796 naturally occurring flavonols, dihydroflavonols, chalcones, dihydrochalcones, aurones and anthocyanins.

However, even though other reports have reviewed the phytochemical constituents of Euphorbia species, most of the published reviews have exclusively focused on ethnomedicinal uses [2,3,4,5,6], isolated diterpenes [10], essential oils and triterpenoids [4]. For example, Goel et al. [37] reviewed the structural diversity of phorbol esters while Shi et al. [38] reported the pharmacological activities and chemical constituents of Euphorbia species. In addition, Andrea and co-authors reviewed the structural diversity of Euphorbia diterpenes covering the period 2008–2012, and their pharmacological activities [10], while Kemboi et al. [4] reported the ethnomedicinal uses and the structural diversity of Euphorbia triterpenoids. Rojas et al. [39] reviewed the phytochemical and functional properties of E. antisyphilitica Zucc, while Yang et al. [40] described the traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacological aspects of E. ebracteolata Hayata. In general, reports on Euphorbia species have exclusively focused on isolated diterpenes and triterpenes with limited reference to flavonoids, and other phenolic constituents such as flavonoids over the past two decades, and there is no report of isolated Euphorbia flavonoids within this period. Hence, in order to gain a more comprehensive understanding of Euphorbia flavonoids, the current review reports the occurrence, isolation, structure, pharmacological activities and the therapeutic potential of flavonoids of the genus Euphorbia covering the period 2000–2020. Harnessing this information can provide an updated database of compounds of the Euphorbia species that may provide potential hits for drug discovery or developing a useful pharmacopeia, as well as assisting in explaining the observed synergistic effect of the crude extracts.

2. Literature Sources and Search Strategy

Information about the Euphorbia flavonoids, their chemistry, biosynthesis, structure, biological activities, structure–activity relationships and potential therapeutic value was obtained through an online literature search using terms such as ‘Euphorbia flavonoids’, ‘Euphorbia constituents’, ‘biological activities of Euphorbia flavonoids’, ‘therapeutic potential’ and ‘structure–activity relationship of Euphorbia flavonoids’ using online databases such as Scopus, Scifinder, Wiley online, Springer Link, Science Direct, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The online search was customized between the years 2000 and 2020 which resulted into over 400 reports about Euphorbia, mainly in the English language that were easily accessible. Of these over 100 reports relevant to the study that described studies on isolation and elucidation of known and novel Euphorbia flavonoids, their biological activities, therapeutic potential and the structure–activity relationships were selected. The retrieved information was critically analyzed and searched for descriptions of previously described Euphorbia flavonoids, their occurrence (extraction solvent and plant part used), structures, their biological activities, therapeutic potential, and structure–activity relationships. Additional information was obtained by reviewing and analyzing the cited references in the selected articles. Hence, the present review provide an account of the previous and the latest information on Euphorbia flavonoids isolated between January 2000 and December 2020, their pharmacological activities, therapeutic potential and structure–activity relationships.

3. Flavonoids

Flavonoids are natural compounds with various phenolic structures biosynthesized by plants [11]. Since the first isolation of a plant flavonoid, rutin, in 1930, there have been over 6000 different types of flavonoids identified from plant species to date [11,41]. The basic skeletal structure of flavonoids has 15 carbon atoms that are arranged to form a C6-C3-C6 ring system. They are divided into different classes based on their molecular structures and the degree of oxidation and unsaturation of the linking chain at C-3. They are biosynthesized in plants via the shikimic acid pathway [11,12,16] as summarized in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

General biosynthetic pathway of flavonoids.

The initial stage is the condensation of a p-coumaroyl-CoA molecule with 3 molecules of malonyl-CoA to give chalcone in the presence of the chalcone isomerase enzyme. Chalcone is further isomerized by chalcone flavanone isomerase enzyme (CHI) to form flavanone. Thereafter, the pathway diverges to several other branches to produce different classes of flavonoids such as flavonols, flavones, flavonones or their dihydroderivatives [11,12] as illustrated in Figure 1.

The position of the benzenoid substituent is the basis of their classification into 2-phenylbenzopyrans, isoflavonoids (3-phenylbenzopyrans), neoflavonoids (4-phenylbenzopyrans) and chalcones. However, flavonols differ from flavonones by the hydroxyl substituent at C-3′ and C-2-C-3 double bonds (Havsteen, 1983). In most cases, flavonoids have the hydroxyl group at C-3, C-5, C-7, C-2′, C-3′, C- C-4′, C-5′. For flavonoid glycosides, the glycosidic linkage is unusually located at C-3 or C-7 and the carbohydrate attached can either be d-glucose, l-rhamnose, glucorhamnose, galactose or arabinose [42]. As a consequence, flavonoids are divided into seven major groups [35,43] as in Figure 2. However, further information on classification and biosynthesis of plant flavonoids is not dealt with in this review as the references can be consulted for detailed information.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Representative structures of major classes of flavonoids.

4. Isolation of Euphorbia Flavonoids

Generally, flavonoids of the Euphorbia species are isolated using similar procedures as employed for other chemical constituents. Since all Euphorbia parts accumulate these constituents, the stems, aerial parts, roots, fruits, seeds, flowers and in some cases the whole plant are usually investigated. The aerial part is commonly studied since it is known to contain different phenolic compounds, especially flavonoids [44,45,46]. However, isolation of these constituents is a complex procedure, because they occur in small quantities as complex mixtures of sugars with similar or related structural parent skeletal framework. Thus, their isolation and identification require the use of a multistep method. The common procedure involves three main stages, including plant preparation, extraction and fractionation of the crude extracts into discrete portions of similar Rf values, and isolation/purification. The sample preparation mostly involves maceration of shade-dried and powdered plant material with methanol or ethanol at room temperature for several days. The resulted filtrates are concentrated under reduced pressure to afford crude extracts. The organic extracts are then subjected to column chromatography with differing step-gradient solvent systems as eluents. Thereafter, the concentrated fractions are monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) using various solvent systems. In cases where the species are rich with flavonoids, the TLC chromatograms of the fractions that have been eluted display intense yellow or brown spots when stained with p-anisaldehyde-sulphuric acid mixture [7].

In some cases, due to trace levels and the complexity of these constituents, they are identified using updated techniques with better resolution and sensitivity such as ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole tandem time of flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q-TOF-MS) or the more traditional techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) or vacuum liquid chromatography (VLC) and rotation planar chromatography (RPC) over silica gel using step gradient elution [44].

5. Flavonoids Isolated from Euphorbia Species

The current report documents the isolation, identification, structure, biological activities, structure–activity relationships and the therapeutic potential of various types of flavonoids from more than 30 Euphorbia species in the past two decades as summarized in Table 1. Of the species that have been investigated, over 80 different types of flavonoids (185) have been isolated from the aerial parts, roots, seeds and whole plant of these species. Over 50 of these compounds were isolated from the aerial and roots extracts, representing about 90% of all flavonoids reported. It could therefore be suggested that the concentration of these chemical constituents is in the aerial and roots parts. Many of these compounds were derived from the ethanol or methanol extracts of these plant parts. Among the investigated species, E. lunulata (number of isolated flavonoids (n) = 33) [26,47], E. humifusa (n = 11) [48], E. hirta (n = 10) [49] and E. tirucalli (n = 8) [50] were frequently investigated species, with E. lunulata [26,47] recording the highest number of isolated flavonoids (n = 33). In contrast, E. mygdaloides [51], E. paralias [52], E. stenoclada [53], E. altotibetic [51,54], E. allepica [51,55] and E. magalanta [51] were the least-investigated species, having the least number of isolated flavonoids (n = 1). Others include E. helioscopia (n = 7) [56], E. lathyris (n = 3) [57], E. humifusa [58], E. ebracteolata (n = 4) [59] and E. lunulata [60]. Future studies should therefore be directed on these species, as they remain a promising source of bioactive constituents.

Table 1.

Reported flavonoids from Euphorbia species.

No Compound Structure and Name Classification Species Name Plant Part,
Solvent
Biological Effect Reference
1.  Inline graphic
quercetin 3-O-β-d-rutinoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. microsciadia Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [45]
2.  Inline graphic
myricetin 3-O-β-d-galactopyranoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. microsciadia Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [45]
3.  Inline graphic
quercetin 3-O-β-d-galactopyranoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. microsciadia,
E. heterophylla
Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [45,46]
4.  Inline graphic
ampelopsin
Flavonol E. tirucalli Whole plant, EtOH Antibacterial, antifungal [50]
5.  Inline graphic
myricetin
Flavonol E. tirucalli Whole plant, EtOH Antibacterial, antifungal [49]
6.  Inline graphic
hirtacoumaroflavonoside (7-O-(p-coumaroyl)-5,7,4-trihydroxy-6-(3,3-dimethylallyl)-flavonol-3-O-β-d-glucopyr-anosyl-(2″→1″′)-O-α-l-rhamnopyranoside)
Carbohydrate flavonol E. hirta Roots, MeOH Inhibitory activity (α-glucosidase) [49]
7.  Inline graphic
dimethoxyquercitrin
Glucosidic flavonol E. hirta Roots, MeOH Inhibitory activity (α-glucosidase) [49]
8.  Inline graphic
2-(3,4-dihydroxy-5-methoxy-phenyl)-3,5-dihydroxy-6,7-dimethoxychromen-4-one
Flavonol E. neriifolia EtOH, leaves Ant-oxidant [61]
9.  Inline graphic
2′,4,4′-trihydroxychalcone
Chalcone E. helioscopia Whole plant, EtOH Not evaluated [56]
10.  Inline graphic
3,5,3′-trihydroxy-6,7-dimethoxy-4′ (7”-hydroxygeranyl-1”-ether) flavone
Flavone E. paralais Whole plant, MeoH Not evaluated [48]
11.  Inline graphic
3,5,7-trihydroxi-2-(3′,4′,5′ trihidroxefenil)-2,3 dihidrobenzopiran-4-ona
Flavonol E. tirucalli,
E. helioscopia
Roots, EtOH Antimicrobial [50,56,62]
12.  Inline graphic
3,5,7-trihydroxy-8-
methoxyflavone
Flavone E. lunulata Aerial, EtOH [26,47]
13.  Inline graphic
3,5,7-trihydroxy-2-2(3′, 4′, 5′-trihydroxyphenyl) benzopyran-4-one
Flavonol E. tirucalli Roots, EtOH Antimicrobial [50,63]
14.  Inline graphic
3-O-methylquercetin
Flavonol E. lunulata Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [25,26]
15.  Inline graphic
kaempferol 3-O-rutinoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. larica,
E. virgata,
E. mgalanta,
E. helioscopia,
E. bivonae,
E. ebracteolata
Whole plant, EtOH Not evaluated [56,64,65,66]
16.  Inline graphic
5,7,2′,5′-tetrahydroxyflavone
Flavone E. lunulata Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [25,26]
17.  Inline graphic
hirtaflavonoside-B (5,7,3′,4′ –trihyroxy-6-(3,3 –dimethyl allyl)-8-9-iso-butenyl)-flavonol-3-O-β-d-glucosidase)
Glucosidic flavonol E. hirta Roots, MeOH Inhibitory activity (α-glucosidase) [49]
18.  Inline graphic
6-methoxyapigenin
Flavone E. larica,
E. lunulata
Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [29,67]
19.  Inline graphic
5,7,8,3′,4′-pentahydroxy-3-methoxyflavone
Flavone E. retusa Whole plant, MeoH Not evaluated [48]
20.  Inline graphic
acacetin
Flavone E. bivonae Roots, MeOH Not evaluated [66]
21.  Inline graphic
apigenin
Flavone E. lunulata,
E. condylocarpa
Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative, antioxidant, anti-tumour, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antiproliferative [25,26,68]
22.  Inline graphic
apigenin-7-O-(6′′-
O-galloyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside
Glucosidic flavone E. humifusa Whole plant, EtOH Anti-HBV [58]
23.  Inline graphic
apigenin-7-O-β-d-glucoside
Glucosidic flavone E. lunulata,
E. humifusa
Aerial, EtOH Anti-HBV [26,54,58]
24.  Inline graphic
aromadendrin
Flavonol E. cuneate Aerial, EtOH Antiulcerogenic [69]
25.  Inline graphic
glabrone
Flavone E. helioscopia Whole plant, EtOH Not evaluated [56]
26.  Inline graphic
hyperoside
Flavone E. lunulata Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [26,70]
27.  Inline graphic
hyperin
Glucosidic flavonol E. lunulata Whole plant, C3H6O Antiproliferative [60]
28.  Inline graphic
isoquercetin
Glucosidic flavonol E. lunulata,
E. tirucalli,
E. ebracteolata
Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [25,26,50,71]
29.  Inline graphic
jaceosidin
Flavone E. lunulata Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [26,67]
30.  Inline graphic
kaempferol
Flavonol E. guyoniana,
E. allepica,
E. charnaesyce,
E. rnagalanta,
E. virgate,
E. lunulata,
E. hirta,
E. wallichii
Aerial; C3H6O:MeOH, whole plant; Me2CO2, Leaf; EtOH Not evaluated [26,29,55,72,73,74]
31.  Inline graphic
kaempferol 3-O-glucoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. guyoniana,
E. rnagalanta,
E. charnaesyce,
E. virgata
Aerial, C3H6O:MeOH, Leaf; EtOH Not evaluated [29,72]
32.  Inline graphic
kaempferol 3-O-β-d-glucopyranoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. altotibetic,
E. retusa
Whole plant [54]
33.  Inline graphic
kaempferol 3-O-β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→6)-β-d-galactopyranoside
Carbohydrate flavonol E. ebracteolata Aerial, EtOH Not evaluated [59]
34.  Inline graphic
isorhamnetin
Flavanone E. hirta,
E. guyoniana,
E. charnaesyce,
E. rnagalanta,
E. amygdaloides
Aerial, C3H6O:MeOH, Leaf; EtOH Not evaluated [29,72,75]
35.  Inline graphic
kaempferol-3-O-β-d-glucuronide
Glucosidic flavonol E. lathyris Aerial, EtOH Cytotoxic [57]
36.  Inline graphic
kaempferol-3-glucuronide
Glucosidic flavonol E. lathyris Aerial, MeoH Not evaluated [51,57]
37.  Inline graphic
kaempferol-3-l-rhamnoside
Carbohydrate flavonol E. lunulata Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [26,70]
38.  Inline graphic
kaempferol-3-O-(6′′-galloyl)-β-d-glucoside
Carbohydrate flavonol E. lunulata,
E. fischeriana,
E. esula
Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [26,76]
39.  Inline graphic
kaempferol-3-O-α-rhamnoside-O-β-d-glucopyranoside
Carbohydrate flavonol E. bivonae Roots, MeOH Not evaluated [66]
40.  Inline graphic
kaempferol-3-O-β-d-glucoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. lunulata,
E. fischeriana,
E. esula
Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [26,76]
41.  Inline graphic
4′-O-methoxy-luteolin-7-O-rhamnoglucoside
Carbohydrate flavonol E. cuneate Aerial, EtOH Antiulcerogenic [69]
42.  Inline graphic
kaempferol-3-β-d glucopyranosyl
Glucosidic flavonol E. retusa Whole plant, MeoH Not evaluated [48]
43.  Inline graphic
kaempferol-7-O-β-d-glucoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. lunulata,
E. fischeriana,
E. esula
Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [26,76]
44.  Inline graphic
licochalcone A
Chalcone E. helioscopia Whole plant, EtOH Not evaluated [56]
45.  Inline graphic
licochalcone B
Chalcone E. helioscopia Whole plant, EtOH Not evaluated [56]
46.  Inline graphic
luteolin
Flavone E. lunulata,
E. hirta,
E. humifusa,
E. bivonae
Aerial, whole plant, roots, EtOH, Antiproliferative, Anti-HBV [25,26,58,66,73]
47.  Inline graphic
luteolin-7-O-(6′′-O-coumaroyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. humifusa Whole plant, EtOH Anti-HBV [58]
48.  Inline graphic
luteolin-7-O-(6′′-O-trans-
feruloyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. humifusa Whole plant, EtOH Anti-HBV [58]
49.  Inline graphic
luteolin-7-O-β-d-glucopyranoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. humifusa Whole plant, EtOH Anti-HBV [58]
50.  Inline graphic
myricetin
Flavonol E. lunulata,
E. wallichii
Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [25,26,74]
51.  Inline graphic
myricetin-3-O-(2′′,3′′-digalloyl)-β-d-galactopyranoside
Carbohydrate flavone E. lunulata Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [25,26]
52.  Inline graphic
myricetin-3-O-(2′′-galloyl)-β-d-galactopyranoside
Carbohydrate flavone E. lunulata Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [25,26]
53.  Inline graphic
myricitrin
Glucosidic flavone E. lunulata Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [25,26]
54.  Inline graphic
naringenin-7-O-β-d-glucoside
Glucosidic flavone E. lunulata Aerial, EtOH [26,54]
55.  Inline graphic
quercetin
Flavonol E. guyoniana,
E. stenoclada,
E. hirta,
E. neriifolia,
E. charnaesyce,
E. rnagalanta,
E. virgate,
E. lunulata,
E. humifusa,
E. helioscopia,
E. tirucalli
Aerial, leaves, C3H6O:MeOH, Leaf; EtOH Antiproliferative, anti-HBV, antidiarrheal, anticancer, antimalarial, antibacterial, antifungal [26,29,50,53,58,62,67,72,77]
56.  Inline graphic
quercetin 3-O-(2′,3′-digalloyl)-β-d-galactopyranoside
Carbohydrate flavonol E. lunulata Whole plant, C3H6O Antiproliferative [60]
57.  Inline graphic
quercetin 3-O-(2′-galloyl)-β-d-galactopyranoside
Carbohydrate flavonol E. lunulata Whole plant, C3H6O Antiproliferative [60]
58.  Inline graphic
quercetin 3-O-(2″,3″-digalloyl)-β-d-galactopyranoside
Carbohydrate flavonol E. lunulata Roots, MeOH Antiproliferation activity [78]
59.  Inline graphic
quercetin 3-O-(2″-galloyl)-β-d-galactopyranoside
Carbhydrate flavonol E. lunulata Roots, MeOH Antiproliferation activity [78]
60.  Inline graphic
quercetin 3-O-6′′-(3-hydroxyl-3-methylglutaryl)-β-d-glucopyranoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. ebracteolata Aerial, EtOH Not evaluated [59]
61.  Inline graphic
quercetin 3-O-6′-(3hydroxyl-3-methylglutaryl)-β-d-glucopyranoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. ebracteolata Aerial, MeOH Not evaluated [78,79]
62.  Inline graphic
quercetin 3-O-glucoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. guyoniana,
E. charnaesyce,
E. virgate,
E. paralias,
E. condylocarpa
Aerial, whole plant, C3H6O:MeOH, Leaf; EtOH Anticancer against colon, breast, hepato cellular and lung cancer cell lines, inhibitory activities [29,52,68,72]
63.  Inline graphic
quercetin 3-O-α-l-rhamnopyranoside
Carbohydrate flavonol E. heterophylla Aerial, EtOH Not evaluated [46]
64.  Inline graphic
quercetin 3-O-β-d-6′′-malonate
Carbohydrate flavonol E. heterophylla Aerial, EtOH Not evaluated [46]
65.  Inline graphic
quercetin 3-O-β-d-glucopyranoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. paralias,
E. humifusa,
E. microsciadia,
E. heterophylla,
E. ebracteolata
Whole plant, Aerial, EtOH Ant-HBV [45,52,58,71]
66.  Inline graphic
quercetin-3-O-β-glucuronic
Glucosidic flavonol E. lunulata,
E. esula
Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [26,80]
67.  Inline graphic
quercetin-3-l-rhamnoside
Carbohydrate flavonol E. lunulata Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [26,70]
68.  Inline graphic
quercetin-3-O-
(2′′-galloyl)-β-d-galactopyranoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. lunulata Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [26,70]
69.  Inline graphic
quercetin-3-O-(2′′,3′′-
digalloyl)-β-d-galactopyranoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. lunulata Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [26,70]
70.  Inline graphic
quercetin-3-O-(6′′-galloyl)-β-d-galactopyranoside
Carbohydrate flavonol E. lunulata Aerial, EtOH [26,54]
71.  Inline graphic
quercetin-3-O-α-l-rhamnosyl (1→6)-β-d-galactoside
Carbohydrate flavonol E. humifusa Whole plant, EtOH Anti-HBV [58]
72.  Inline graphic
quercetin-3-O-α-rhamnoside
Carbohydrate flavonol E. hirta Whole plant, MeOH Anti-snake venom activity [81]
73.  Inline graphicquercetin-3-O-β-
d-glucopyranosyl-
(1-4)-O-α-l-rhamnopyranoside
Carboydrate flavonol E.drancunculoides Aerial, EtOH Cytotoxic [82]
74.  Inline graphic
quercetin-3-O-β-d-galactoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. humifusa, Whole plant, EtOH, Anti-HBV, cytotoxic [58]
75.  Inline graphic
quercetin-3-O-β-l-rhamnoside
Carbohydrate flavonol E. lunulata,
E. fischeriana,
E. esula
Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [26,76]
76.  Inline graphic
quercetin-7-O-β-d-glucoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. lunulata,
E. fischeriana,
E. esula
Aerial, EtOH Antiproliferative [26,76]
77.  Inline graphic
quercetin 3-O-6′′-(3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl)-β-d-glucopyranoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. ebracteolata leaves [83]
78.  Inline graphic
quercitrin
Glucosidic flavonol E. stenoclada,
E. tirucalli
Aerial, MeOH, EtOH Antiproliferative, antibacterial, antifungal [50,53]
79.  Inline graphic
pinocembrin
Flavone E. hirta Aerial, EtOH Not evaluated [75]
80.  Inline graphic
rhamnetin-3-α-arabinofuranoside
Carbohydrate flavonol E. lathyris,
E-amygdaloides
Aerial, EtOH Not evaluated [51,75]
81.  Inline graphic
rutin
Glucosidic flavonol E. guyoniana,
E. charnaesyce,
E. rnagalanta,
E. virgate,
E. tirucalli,
E. ebracteolata
Aerial, C3H6O:MeOH, Leaf; EtOH Antibacterial, antifungal [29,50,71,72]
82.  Inline graphic
eriodictyol
Flavone E. matabelensis Stems, MeOH Antiproliferative [84]
83.  Inline graphic
naringenin
Flavone E. matabelensis Stems, MeOH Antiproliferative [84]
84.  Inline graphic
5,7,3′,4′ -trihyroxy-6-(3,3 –dimethyl allyl)-8-9-iso-butenyl)-flavonol-3-C-β-d-glucosidase
Glucosidic flavonol E. hirta Aerial, MeOH Inhibitory activity (α-glucosidase) [85]
85.  Inline graphic
apigenin-7-O-β-d-apiofuranosyl(1→2)-β-d-glucopyranoside
Glucosidic flavonol E. humifusa Whole plant, EtOH Anti-HBV [58]
86.  Inline graphic
isoaromadendrin-7-O-β-d-glucopyranoside (isosinemsin)
Glucosidic flavonol E. cuneata Whole plant, EtOH Hypertensive [86]

Most of the isolated flavonoids were flavonols and comprise simple O-substitution patterns, C-methylation, prenylation, and adducts of quercetin (55) and kaempferol (30). Others have a glycoside, glycosidic linkages and a carbohydrate attached at either C-3 or C-7, and have been designated as d-glucose such as kaempferol 3-O-glucoside (31), L-rhamnose such as kaempferol-3-l-rhamnoside (37), or glucorhamnose such as kaempferol-3-O-α-rhamnoside-O-β-d-glucopyranoside (39). Of these, prenylated and glycosylated flavonols remain the most abundant classes of reported flavonoids in the review period, representing about 80% of all reported flavonoids in Euphorbia species to date. However, flavanones and chalcones have also been reported within the review period. For instance, 2′,4,4′-trihydroxychalcone (9) [56], has been reported from E. helioscopia. In addition, Laila [48] reported the isolation of 3,5,3′-trihydroxy-6,7-d-methoxy-4′ (7”-hydroxygeranyl-1”-ether) flavone (10) and 5,7,8,3′,4′-pentahydroxy-3-methoxyflavone (19) from the methanol extracts of E. paralais and E. retusa, respectively. Reported literature also shows that the flavone category makes up the second-largest group of flavonoids of the Euphorbia species, and includes apigenin (21), O-methylated flavones such as acacetin (20) from E. bivonae as well as flavonoid glycosides such as rutin (81) from E. guyoniana, kaempferol-3-O-α-dirhamnoside-O-β-d-glucopyranoside (39) from E. bivonae and kaempferol-3-rutinoside (15) from E. larica, among others. Most of the studied species contain one or many different classes of these flavonoids. Table 1 gives a summary of the isolated flavonoids, their structures, occurrence and their pharmacological effect.

Some flavonoids such as rhamnetin-3-α-arabinofuranoside (80) from E. amygdaloides, kaempferol-3-glucuronide (36) from E. lathyris [52,57] and quercetin-3-O-β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1-4)-O-α-l-rhamnopyranoside (73) from E. drancunculoides were identified for the first time in these species. Phytochemical investigation of E. humifusa ethanol extracts resulted in isolation of 13 flavone glucosides. Among them were the uncommonly isolated apigenin-7-O-(6′′-O-galloyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside (22), luteolin-7-O-β-d-glucopyranoside (49), luteolin-7-O-(6′′-O-trans-feruloyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside (48) as well as luteolin-7-O-(6′′-O-coumaroyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside (47). It was interesting to note that luteolin-7-O-(6′′-O-trans-feruloyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside (48) and luteolin-7-O-(6′′-O-coumaroyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside (47) had similar features as apigenin-7-O-(6′′-O-galloyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside (22). The distinctive feature was that the parent structure of apigenin-7-O-(6′′-O-galloyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside (22) was apigenin (21) with a galloyl substitution on glucoside, while luteolin-7-O-(6′′-O-trans-feruloyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside (48) and luteolin-7-O-(6′′-O-coumaroyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside (47) was luteolin (46) with a feruloyl and coumaroyl substituent on the parent ring system, respectively [58].

In addition, flavonoids named kaempferol-3-O-β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→6)-β-d-galactopyranoside (33) and quercetin 3-O-6′′-(3-hydroxyl-3-methylglutaryl)-β-d-glucopyranoside (60) from E. ebracteolata were reported for the first time by Xin et al. [59]. This showed the structural diversity of Euphorbia flavonoids. A limited number of chalcones have also been isolated from Euphorbia species. For instance, licochalcone A (44), 2′,4,4′-trihydroxychalcone (9), licochalcone B (45), and glabrone (25) were isolated from E. helioscopia [56]. Most of these flavonoids were identified from the aerial extracts, which also reported significant pharmacological activities. Chemical investigation of the ethanolic root extracts of E. tirucalli using chromatographic procedures led to the isolation of a previously unreported flavonoid called myricetin (5) [50]. In addition, previously unreported quercetin 3-O-(2′,3′-digalloyl)-β-d-galactopyranoside (56) was isolated from the acetone whole plant extract of E. lunulata [60]. This compound showed weak antiproliferative activities and was found to mimic insulin that is bound with the galloyl group at the galactosyl moiety. Hence, it could become one of the seed molecules that can be used for the development of a nonpeptidyl insulin alternative medicine [60].

6. Biological Studies, Structure–Activity Relationship and Therapeutic Potential

6.1. Cytotoxic Studies

In vitro evaluation of the ethanolic extract of E. stenoclada for its antiproliferative activity against human airway smooth muscle cells (HASMC) was conducted by Chaabi et al. [53]. The results showed that the ethanolic extract abolished completely the interleukin-1β (IL-1β)-induced proliferation of HASMC with IC50 of 0.73 ± 0.08 µg/mL. However, there was reduced activity of the fractionated crude extracts, suggesting that the crude extract was active due to the synergetic effect of multiple compounds. In addition, no cytotoxic effects were exhibited up to 20 µg/mL. Quercetin (55), the major constituent isolated from this extract, showed moderate activity with IC50 of 0.49 ± 0.12 µg/mL.

The structure–activity relationship studies using methylated and glycosylated flavonols showed that methylation reduces the antiproliferative activities, while glycosylation lost the activity [53]. For all the quercetin heterosides used, none of them exhibited any activity on the 1β (IL-1β)-induced proliferation of HASMC, an indication that the presence of the hydroxyl group at C-3 is key in retaining the activity, as its substitution resulted in low activity or complete loss of it. In addition, methylation of any of the hydroxyl groups of flavonol also had a negative effect on the activity. This was the case even at higher concentrations, suggesting that the free hydroxyl groups of quercetin (55) are all important in retaining its activity and that its substitution by methylation and glycosylation results in a lowering or loss of its activity [53]. It was also found to have a relaxant effect on guinea pig trachea pre-contracted with histamine [78,87] as well as in vitro inhibition of histamine release from the rat peritoneal mast cells by 95–97% [88]. This shows the therapeutic potential of quercetin (55) as a promising antiasthmatic agent.

Analysis of the anticancer activities of the flavonoid rich extract of E. lunulata showed that it could inhibit the growth of Lewis lung cancer cells in mice and the rabbit serum. It was also shown to significantly inhibit the proliferation of lung cancer cells (A549) in a concentration–time dependent manner. For instance, at a concentration of 20% for 72 h, the proliferation rate of lung cancer cells was 39.08% [89]. The authors suggested that the plant extract could induce cell apoptosis by cell arrest in G1 phase. In addition, Gao et al. [90] found that the hexane extract of E. lunulata could inhibit the proliferation of human hepatoma (Hep-G2) cells also in a time–concentration dependent manner in vitro, with an inhibition rate of 0.063 at 2.5 µg/mL and 0.69 at 80 µg/mL after 48 h. This was further related to the mitochondrial pathways and/or cellular pathways of apoptosis.

The flavonoids eriodictyol (82) and naringenin (83) isolated from E. metabelensis tested negative on human normal cells (HeLa), breast cancer (MCF-7) and epithelial human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) cell lines, and G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channel-blocking activities in vitro. The IC50 values for naringenin (83) were reported as 12.43 µM for HeLa, 5.78 µM for MCF-7, and 19.13 µM for MDA-MB-231 cells. Its blocking activity on GIRK channels was reported to be weak with inhibition of 12.18% ± 1.39 for eriodictyol (82) and 13.50% ± 2.69 for naringenin (83), at 10.00 µM. Despite the negative effect, these compounds possess promising anti-inflammatory, anti-allergenic, antimicrobial, and antioxidant properties [77,84,91,92,93].

Phytochemical analysis of 15 Euphorbia species revealed the presence of flavonoids from the methanol aerial extracts [51]. The plant extracts were evaluated for their in vitro anticancer properties against human liver cancer (HepG-2) and breast cancer (MCF-7) cell lines. The methanol extract of E. lactea exhibited good anticancer activities against HepG-2 and MCF-7 cell lines with IC50 of 5.20 and 5.10 µg/mL, respectively. Previous anticancer assays of ethanolic extracts from the same species displayed significant activities against a hepatic cancer cell line (HEp-2) with IC50 of 89.00 µg/mL [94]. In addition, similar studies have shown that the extract of E. lactea displayed anticancer and anti-migratory activities toward cellosaurus (HN22) cells [95]. It was also observed that the extracts of E. officinarum and E. royleana showed significant activities against human colon cancer adenocarcinoma cell lines (Caco-2) [51]. This was the first assay on the cytotoxicity of E. officinarum against these cancer cell lines. Methanol extracts of E. trigona reported moderate cytotoxicity against MCF-7 and Caco-2 cells, while previous studies on the latex of E. trigona against colon cancer cell lines (HT-29) were found to be inactive [96]. Notably, among the tested Euphorbia extracts, only E. horrida, E. tirucalli and E. ingens were inactive against all three tested cell lines. In contrast, previous studies reported good cytotoxic effects of E. tirucalli butanol extract against MCF-7 cells as well as against human leukocytes, with IC50 of between 100 and 150 µg/mL [97]. The observed anticancer activities were attributed to the presence of identified phenolic and flavonoid constituents in the plant extracts.

Chemical investigation of E. paralias whole-plant extracts afforded quercetin-3-O-β-d-glucoside (62). This compound exhibited moderate toxicity against human liver cancer (HepG-2) and human lung cancer (A549) cells with IC50 values of 41 and 36 µM, respectively [52]. It also displayed the ability to inhibit the glutamine synthase enzyme with IC50 of 40 µM. Due to the fact that this enzyme is a potential target in the development of new antimycobacterial agents and that it plays an important role as a virulent factor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, quercetin-3-O-β-d-glucoside (62) could be suggested for development as a potential antituberculotic agent [52]. In addition, Salehi et al. [77] reported the antidiarrheal activities of quercitrin (78) isolated from E. hirta decoction in mice at doses of 50 mg/kg.

Cheng et al. [62] found that E. helioscopia had a high concentration of quercetin (55) flavonoid. Evaluation of the extracts showed that it effectively inhibited the growth of HepG2 (human hepatocellular carcinoma lines) at 50 μg/mL in vivo (p < 0.01).

Flavonoids show anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative properties through several mechanisms of action such as inhibition of protein kinase and transcription factors, inhibition of phosphodiesterase impact on arachidonic acid metabolisms and effects in immune system, among others. Since protein kinases are essential in signal transduction during cell activation in inflammation, some flavonoids are known to target multiple central kinases involved in the processes of multiple signaling pathways [98]. Flavonoids have also been reported to inhibit kinases such as protein kinase C, phosphatidylinositol kinase, phosphoinositol kinase, tyrosine kinase or cyclin-dependent kinase-4 [99,100]. They are suggested to modulate protein kinases by inhibiting the transcription factors, such as nuclear factor kappa-light chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) [101], which regulates different chemokines, cytokines and cell adhesion molecules that are involved in inflammation. For example, quercetin (55) has been used as an effective colorectal cancer agent and has been shown to exhibit different mechanisms of action, among them antioxidant activity, cell-cycle arrest, modulation of estrogen receptors, increase in apoptosis, inhibition of metastasis, regulation of signaling pathways and angiogenesis [102]. Luteolin (46) has shown anticancer activities in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through a pro-apoptotic process and cell-cycle arrest at the G2/M stage [103].

In respect to the inhibition of phosphodiesterase enzyme impact on arachidonic acid metabolisms, flavonoids are known to inhibit the phosphodiesterases signals such as cAMP phosphodiesterase which is a key messenger molecule that regulates cell functions during inflammation stages. Flavonoids have the potential to block phosphodiesterases cAMP degradation and prolong cAMP signaling of the enzyme, thereby exhibiting anti-inflammatory properties [104]. Kaempferol (30) was found to stimulate body antioxidants against free radicals that may cause cancer [105], while myricetin (5) showed significant anti-inflammatory and anticancer activities by targeting different metabolic pathways in mitochondria that may result in cancer-cell death [106]. Furthermore, the synthetic polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles from the flavonoid hesperidin decreased the cell viability against C6 glioma cells [106,107]. In addition, the most common benzo-furanone, an anticancer flavonoid, was found to have different mechanisms of action against cancer cells as it has multiple targets such as acting on cyclin dependent kinase, adenosine receptor, histone deacetylase, microtubules, telomerase and sirtuins [108].

During inflammation, arachidonic acid is produced from the phospholipids of the plasma membranes by the phospholipase A2 (PLA2) enzyme. The acid is then oxidized by different oxygenases enzymes to produce thromboxanes, leukotrienes prostaglandins and other inflammatory mediators [109]. Flavonoids can inhibit such enzymes that are involved in this process (metabolism of arachidonic acid) and hence reduce the discharge of inflammatory mediators resulting from this pathway. Flavonoids are further suggested to inhibit the biosynthesis of thromboxanes, prostaglandins and leukotrienes by inhibition of the phospholipase A2 (PLA2) [110,111] and cyclooxygenase (COX) [112] enzymes.

Flavonoids can also inhibit maturation of dendritic cells (DCs) by suppressing maturation markers such as CD80, CD86, which are relevant for CD4+T lymphocytes cell activation [113,114]. Flavonoids influence the inflammatory response of dendritic cells by modulation of the iron metabolism [115]. Other studies have shown that some flavonoids decrease the discharge of histamine or prostaglandin from mast cells or can lead to inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines or chemokine production in neutrophils, mast cells and other immune cells [116,117,118]. It has also been demonstrated that flavonoids can bind to cytokine receptors such as the IL-17RA subunit of the IL-17 receptor, leading to the attenuation in its signaling. They can also inhibit the downstream signaling from receptors such as the high affinity receptor and other receptors at the site of inflammation [119].

6.2. Antioxidant Activities

Phytochemical investigation of E. neriifolia resulted in identification of the 2-(3,4-dihydroxy-5-methoxy-phenyl)-3,5-dihydroxy-6,7-dimethoxychromen-4-one (8) flavonoid from the leaf ethanol extract. This compound scavenged free radicals and reactive oxygen species (ROS), and inhibited lipid peroxidation with antioxidant activity of 76.15% compared to ascorbic acid at 75.6%. This suggests that compound (8) may have anticancer potential if such activity can be replicated in vivo. The high concentration of such flavonoids in E. neriifolia has been predicted to be responsible for the observed antioxidative mechanisms, which may be useful therapeutically, as oxidation has been implicated in causing several degenerative diseases [61].

A previous study by the same group reported that the pre-hepato-carcinogenesis, which is commonly induced by N-nitrosodiethylamine (DENA), was inhibited by the 70% hydro-ethanolic (v/v) extract of E. neriifolia and by the isolated flavonoid (8) [120]. These bioactive constituents, especially flavonoids and saponins, are known to neutralize the free radicals and other metabolic intermediate products that are highly reactive due to the presence of an unpaired electron. Hence, they are attributed to the observed protective histological effects. These findings could therefore be essential in validation of the ethnomedicinal uses and therapeutic potential of this plant.

Phytochemical investigation of E. lathyris showed that the root extract has the highest concentration of rutin flavonoids. However, the antioxidant evaluation of the testa, root and seed extracts showed that 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free-radical scavenging activity was highest for the testa extracts (61.29 ± 0.29 mmol Trolox/100 g dry weight of free compounds), while the highest ferric-reducing antioxidant power was shown by the seed extracts (1927.43 ± 52.13 mg FeSO4/100 g dry weight of free compounds). It was also established that the DPPH free-radical scavenging activities are dependent on the total phenolic content for different parts of E. lathyris extracts, which means that the higher the concentration of flavonoids and other phenolic compounds, the higher is the activity [121].

The postulated mechanism of action of these flavonoids as antioxidants is protection against lipid peroxidation that results in cell death. Quercetin (55), a free radical scavenger, was found to exert a protective effect. Furthermore, it was found to prevent free-radical-induced tissue damage in different ways. The most common is suggested to be the direct scavenging of free radicals. By doing so, the flavonoid, specifically quercetin (55), could inhibit the oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation in vitro [122]. This action is known to protect against atherosclerosis. In addition, quercetin (55) can offer other potential therapeutic application in the prevention and treatment of allergies, fever and asthma. It was also found to work better when it is used in combination with bromelain [122]. Indeed, flavonoids such as quercetin (55) are common in foods such as apples, onions, tea, nuts, berries, cauliflower and cabbage among others. They can therefore provide many health-promoting benefits such as improving cardiovascular health, treatment of eye diseases, arthritis and, allergic disorders, as well as reducing the risk of cancers. Chemical analysis of the ethyl acetate aerial extracts of E. geniculata resulted in isolation of rutin (81), quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside (75), quercetin-3-O-β-D- glucopyranoside (65), and quercetin (55). The nephroprotective potential of the plant extract was further evaluated in male rats with thioacetamide-induced kidney injury. The results showed marked nephrotoxicity and were suggested to be through the alteration of kidney biomarkers and improving the redox status of the tissue, hence bringing the serum biochemical parameters to normal levels [123].

Within the larger Euphorbiaceae species, other genera have been reported to contain antioxidant flavonoids. For instance, chemical analysis of Croton species; C. andinus, C. argentines, C. catamarcensis, C. cordobensis, C. curiosus, C. lachnostachyus, C. lanatus, C. saltensis and C. serratifolius revealed the presence of O-glycosides flavonols, including kaempferol, quercetin and isorhamnetin as well as flavones such as apigenin. There was a significant degree (p > 0.05) of correlation between relative abundances of phenolic content and quercetin derivatives in these species, with the reducing antioxidant potential [124].

6.3. Anti-Hepatitis Activities

All the isolated flavonoids from E. humifusa were evaluated for their anti-HBV activity in vitro [58]. The compounds were assayed for their anti-HBV potential by observing the inhibitory secretion of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B e-antigen (HBVe, HBeAg) in HBV-infected HepG-2 cells, at a non-cytotoxic concentration. The flavonoids apigenin-7-O-β-d-glucopyranoside (23) and apigenin-7-O-(6′′-O-galloyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside (22) significantly blocked the secretion of HBsAg and HBeAg in a dose-dependent manner. Apigenin-7-O-β-d-glucopyranoside (23) inhibited HBsAg secretion and HBeAg secretion by 77.2% and 55.5%, respectively, at a non-cytotoxic concentration of 40 μgmL−1, This was slightly higher than that of apigenin-7-O-(6′′-O-galloyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside (23) with inhibition of 82.2% and 65.6% for HBsAg and HBeAg secretion, respectively, at non-cytotoxic concentrations of 80 μgmL−1. Apigenin-7-O-(6′′-O-galloyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside (22) has a similar structure to apigenin-7-O-β-d-glucopyranoside (23) except for the substitution of a galloyl group on C-6 of glucoside. Therefore, it was postulated that the galloyl group could be important in retaining the anti-HBV activity [58].

In contrast, luteolin-7-O-β-d-glucopyranoside (49) and luteolin-7-O-(6′′-O-trans-feruloyl)-β-D-glucopyranoside (48) showed weaker anti-HBV activity, as they had 50% and 33.9% secretion inhibition of HBsAg and HBeAg, respectively, at a non-cytotoxic concentration of 30 μgmL−1. In addition, luteolin-7-O-(6′′-O-coumaroyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside (48) displayed weak activity with secretion inhibition of HBsAg and HBeAg at 18.6% and 58.9% at a concentration of 80 μgmL−1. Luteolin (46), and quercetin (55), on the other hand, were inactive in relation to their high cytotoxicity. In addition apigenin-7-O-β-d-apiofuranosyl (1→2)-β-d-glucopyranoside (85), quercetin-3-O-α-L-rhamnosyl(1→6)-β-d-galactoside (84), quercetin-3-O-β-d-glucopyranoside (65) and quercetin-3-O-β-D-galactoside (74) (quercetin glucoside) showed no effect. The structure–activity relationship studies revealed that the parent structure (Figure 3) was essential to the anti-HBV activity of these compounds. It was also established that the number of glucosides in the parent structure could significantly influence their cytotoxicity. Furthermore, substitution of an acyl moiety for the glucoside is also important in retaining the anti-HBV activities of these compounds [58].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Summary of key pharmacopheric elements of flavonoids.

Analysis of the aerial part extracts of E. microsciadia resulted in isolation of four (13, 65) flavonoids for the first time from this species [45]. These compounds were further evaluated for their immunomodulatory activities in vitro. The results showed lower lymphocyte suppression activity for all the flavonoids compared to prednisolone, the standard drug. It was also established that the suppressive activities of flavonoids having a hydroxyl group at both C-3′-and C-4′ in their B-ring such as quercetin 3-O-β-d-galactopyranoside (3) were more active than those with C-3′, C-4′ and C-5′ hydroxyl substitution as in myricetin 3-O-β-d-galactopyranoside (2). In addition, quercetin 3-O-β-d-rutinoside and myricetin 3-O-β-d-galactopyranoside (2) were inactive even at a higher concentration of 50 μg/mL [45]. It can therefore be rationalized that the hydroxyl groups at C-3, C-3′, C-4′, C-5′ and the parent structure are essential in retaining the activities and that glycosylation and methylation of these hydroxyl groups lowers the activity. Hence, they can be considered as key pharmacopheric elements of flavonoids as illustrated in Figure 3.

This was in agreement with previous reports that showed reduction of in vitro biological activities of the glycosylated form of these flavonoids [125]. Glycosylation of quercetin flavonoids reduces the in vitro biological activities compared to their corresponding aglycone forms. The lymphocyte antiproliferative activities of these compounds suggests that the type and the size of the sugar moiety influences the suppression activity on the T-cells. In other similar studies, using five different cell lines (colorectal adenocarcinoma (HT-29), lung carcinoma (A549), breast cancer (MCF-7), hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG-2) and colorectal carcinoma (HCT-116)), quercetin 3-O-β-d-galactopyranoside (2) showed the highest growth inhibitory rate of 20% in HT-29 and HepG-2, while rutin (81) recorded an inhibitory rate of 15% [126]. Flavonoids have also been suggested to have the capability to inhibit the production of superoxide enzymes such as xanthine oxidase and protein kinase C (PKC). PKC plays a significant role in the activation of T-cells. Hence, the inhibition of PKC by these compounds could be suggested to be their mechanism of action for the observed lymphocyte antiproliferative activities [126].

6.4. Anti-Venom Activities

Quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside (72) from the methanol extract of E. hirta demonstrated inhibition of the protease, phospholipase (PLA2), hyaluronidase and hemolytic activity of lyophilized snake venom. There was also an increase in survival time of mice that were injected with a mixture of snake venom with quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside (72). An increase in concentration of quercetin led to a reduction in edema to 107%, suggesting the inflammation inhibition that is caused by the venom. This could validate the medicinal application of this species traditionally in treating snake and scorpion poisoning [2,4]. Exploring such multifunctional plant molecules with anti-venom activities could further help in development of alternative and complementary medicine for snake- and scorpion-bite treatments, particularly in rural areas where the distribution of snake antivenom is not available. Furthermore, in silico molecular-docking analysis showed that quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside (72) interacts more efficiently through hydrogen bonds. The presence of a sugar substituent in quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside (72) was found to enhance the enzyme-ligand interactions. This was supported by findings of molecular dynamic simulations in vitro that showed the presence of various amino acid residues at the substrate binding sites of quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside (72) over quercetin (55). This study can therefore provide a scientific basis for the use of E. hirta extracts in traditional medicines [81]. In a related study, two Jatropha (Euphorbiaceae) species showed marked anti-edematogenic activities. While there was no observed difference when the extracts of the two species (J. mollissima and J. gossypiifolia) were administered by oral route (p > 0.05), through the intraperitoneal route J. gossypiifolia exhibited promising anti-edematogenic activity (p < 0.001) higher than J. mollissima. In antimicrobial studies, only J. gossypiifolia displayed antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Bacillus cereus with MIC value of 6.0 µg/µL compared to Vancomycin with MIC value of 0.5 µg/µL [127].

6.5. Antimalarial Activities

The methanol extract of E. hirta aerial parts exhibited 90% growth inhibition against Plasmodium falciparum at 5 µg/mL and displayed low toxicity against multidrug-resistant KB 3-1 cells [16]. This demonstrates the potential of this plant as an antimalarial agent, which supports the traditional uses in treatment of microbial infections [2]. Moreover, from this extract through a bio-guided methodology, flavonols were identified as quercitrin (78), and myricitrin (53). These flavonoids were able to inhibit the proliferation of the protozoan parasite responsible for malaria disease, Plasmodium falciparum strains FCR-3 (cycloguanil-resistant from Gambia) and CDC1 (chloroquine sensitive), with similar IC50 values 2.50 to 11.60 µM, respectively [16]. Antiplasmodial studies of ethanol extracts of the E. hirta whole plant showed that the flavonoid rich ethanol extracts did not suppress the chloroquine-sensitive strains of Plasmodium in vivo. The extract reduced the parasetemia levels at 44.36% compared to Camosunate (68.35%) [128]. Moreover, in vivo studies on the effects of flavonoids on mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate in albino rats showed that isoaromadendrin-7-O-β-d-glucopyranoside (isosinemsin) isolated from E. cuneata exhibited a decrease in blood pressure and heart rate at 16.6 mmHg and 16.6%, respectively [87].

6.6. Antibacterial and Antifungal Activities

Evaluation of extracts and isolated compounds from E. tirucalli displayed significant antibacterial and antifungal activities of the extracts against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, S. brasiliensis UFPE 121, E. coli ATCC 8739 and C. albicans UFPE 0231, with minimum inhibition (MIC) values ranging between 256 to 1024 μg/mL. Ampelopsin (4) was the most active compound with MIC value of 16 μg/mL against E. coli ATCC 8739, compared to tetracycline, with MIC value of 32 μg/mL. This demonstrates the antibacterial potential of Euphorbia flavonoids compared to conventional antibiotics. In antifungal studies, myricetin (5) showed the highest activity compared to amphotericin B against C. albicans UFPE 0231 with MIC value of 32 μg/mL compared to amphotericin B (16 μg/mL) [50]. Similarly, chemical profiling of the hexane extract of E. royleana revealed high phenolic and flavonoid contents and displayed significant antimicrobial activities [129]. The extract exhibited antifungal activity against Aspergillus niger and antibacterial activity against the Gram-positive bacteria Bacillus subtilis [129]. In addition, antibacterial evaluation of E. guyoniana extracts showed that the strains used were more sensitive to the flavonoids fractions of E. guyoniana with MICs varying from 1.47 to 61.78 mg/mL in the order of Staphylococcus aureus > Streptococcus faecalis > Escherichia coli [130].

In related studies, antibacterial activities of flavonoids from other genera in the Euphorbiaceae family have been reported. For instance, kaempferol 7-O-β-d-(6″-O-cumaroyl)-glucopyranoside, isolated from Croton piauhiensis (Euphorbiaceae) leaves, was evaluated for its antibacterial activities. The intrinsic antimicrobial activities and enhancement properties of this compound against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus strains were further investigated. The results revealed that kaempferol 7-O-β-d-(6″-O-cumaroyl)-glucopyranoside had no antibacterial activity against strains tested at concentrations <1024 μg/mL. The combination of kaempferol 7-O-β-d-(6″-O-cumaroyl)-glucopyranoside at a concentration of 128 μg/mL with gentamicin exhibited synergistic effects against S. aureus and E. coli and also reduced the minimum inhibition (MIC) from 16 μg/mL to 4 μg/mL and 8 μg/mL, respectively [131]. In contrast, Ali et al. [132] showed that 5-7-dihydroxyflavone from Oroxylum indicum inhibited the growth of Gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli and P. aeruginosa. In the same study, the authors reported that the baicalein flavonoid exhibited weak activities against Gram-positive bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis and S. aureus. The weak activity was attributed to the presence of a new group at C-6. The activities with synergistic effects were attributed to the hydroxyl phenyl groups that have high affinity for proteins [133].

Even though the mechanisms of action of various Euphorbia flavonoids have not been fully explored, various mechanisms of action of plant flavonoids have previously been fronted. Flavones are suggested to form a complex with components of the cell wall and thus inhibit further adhesions or microbial growth. For instance, licoflavone C isolated from Retama raetam flowers was found to be active against E. coli via formation of complexes with extracellular and soluble proteins with MIC value of 7.81 μg/mL [134]. Other postulated mechanisms include inhibition of bacterial enzymes (such as tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase) [135], inhibition of bacterial efflux pump and rise in the susceptibility of existing antibiotics [136], change in cytoplasmic membrane function, nucleic acid synthesis inhibition, decrease in cell attachment, inhibition of energy metabolism, formation of biofilm, changing in membrane permeability, attenuation of the pathogenicity [137,138], damage of the cytoplasmic membrane [137,138], inhibition of nucleic acid synthesis (for instance, the inhibition of DNA gyrase from E. coli by quercetin (55), and apigenin (21) [139]) among others, as summarized in Figure 4. It was further established that the combination of apigenin and ceftazidime damages the cytoplasmic membrane of ceftazidime-resistant enterobacter cloacae, leading to subsequent leakage of intracellular components [140].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Summary of antibacterial and antifungal mechanisms of actions of flavonoids.

7. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

The extensive utilization of Euphorbia species in traditional and complementary medicines for treatment of various diseased conditions has led to increased interest in their phytochemistry and in vitro as well as in vivo studies using cells and animal models. The present review comprises a detailed phytopharmacological account of information available on Euphorbia flavonoids between 2000 and 2020. The findings suggest that the extracts and isolated flavonoids possess anticancer, antiproliferative, antimalarial, antibacterial, antivenom, anti-inflammatory, anti-hepatitis and antioxidant properties. Of these, antioxidant and anticancer activities are the most studied biological activities, partly due to the ethnomedicinal application of these species as anticancer agents. Indeed, it is widely accepted that the crude extracts have a synergetic effect compared to individual bioactive compounds. Nonetheless, only a handful of studies assessed the pharmacological potential of Euphorbia flavonoids as most studies employed the whole crude extracts. This limits the translational value as researchers are not equipped to determine whether the observed activities are related to the actions of a single bioactive compound or the synergy between multiple constituents present. It was also reported that these flavonoids possess different mechanisms of action against cancer cells. For instance, quercetin exhibited different mechanisms of action such as antioxidant activity, cell-cycle arrest and modulation of estrogen receptors among others. This is essential towards development of a potent anticancer agent. Of the investigated species, over 80 different types of flavonoids have been isolated from the aerial parts, roots, seeds and whole plant of these species. Most of the isolated flavonoids were flavonols and comprised simple O-substitution patterns, C-methylation and prenylation. Others had glycoside, glycosidic linkages and a carbohydrate attached at either C-3 or C-7, and were designated as d-glucose, l-rhamnose or glucorhamnose. A limited number of chalcones were also reported. The structure–activity relationship studies showed that methylation of hydroxyl groups at C-3 or C-7 reduces the activities, while glycosylation results in loss of activity. These constituents can therefore offer a potential alternative for development of therapeutic agents based on the Euphorbia species.

While the overall findings suggest a promising future with an abundance of therapeutic potential of the Euphorbia species, there are still many aspects of research on these species that need to be considered. These include using species from different ecological zones, adoption of high throughput screening strategies and metabolomics tools for discovery of new bioactive compounds in complex plant matrices, toxicological studies, detailed mechanistic studies and molecular analysis. Furthermore, the current evidence is largely limited to the unverified ethnomedicinal application of these species in folk medicine and their pharmacological studies in vitro. Essentially, more robust scientific studies are needed before confirmatory decisions can be made on the therapeutic potential of flavonoids from Euphorbia species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.K.M. and V.J.T. Literature search D.K.M., M.D., and N.M. Writing and draft preparation D.K.M. Review and editing W.A.A., M.S., L.J.M., R.W., M.K., X.S.-N. and V.J.T. Supervision, V.J.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by NRF-TWAS, South Africa. National Research Foundation Research grant under grant numbers (99358) and Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.De Montellano B.O. Empirical Aztec medicine. Science. 1975;188:215–220. doi: 10.1126/science.1090996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Madeleine E., Olwen M., Grace C., Haris S.L., Niclas N., Henrik T., Nina R. Global medicinal uses of Euphorbia L. (Euphorbiaceae) J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015;76:90–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hooper M. Major Herbs of Ayurveda. Elsevier Health Sciences; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2002. pp. 340–345. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kemboi D., Xolani P., Moses L., Jacqueline T. A review of the ethnomedicinal uses, biological activities and triterpenoids of Euphorbia species. Molecules. 2020;25:4019. doi: 10.3390/molecules25174019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Islam M.T., Mata O., Aguiar R.S., Paz M.C.J., Alencar M.B., Melo-Cavalcante A.C. Therapeutic potential of essential oils focusing on diterpenes. Phytother. Res. 2016;30:1420–1444. doi: 10.1002/ptr.5652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mihail A., Viktorija M., Liljana K.G., Liljana G.T. Review of the anticancer and cytotoxic activity of some species from the genus Euphorbia. [(accessed on 1 July 2020)];Agric. Conspec. Sci. 2019 84:11–23. Available online: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/318988. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Muhammad A., Abdul S., Muhammad J., Farhat U., Muhammad O., Ikram U., Jawad A., Muhammad S. Flavonoids as prospective neuroprotectants and their therapeutic propensity in aging associated neurological disorders. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2019:1–20. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Scholz A. Euphorbiaceae. In: Engler A., editor. Syllabus der Planzenfamilien. Gebrüder Bornträger; Berlin, Germany: 1964. pp. 255–261. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Webster G.L. Classification of the Euphorbiaceae. Ann. Mol. Bot. Gard. 1994;81:3–32. doi: 10.2307/2399908. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Andrea V., Judit H. Euphorbia diterpenes: Isolation, structure, biological activity, and synthesis (2008–2012) Chem Rev. 2014;114:8579–8612. doi: 10.1021/cr400541j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nabavi S.M., Samec D., Tomczyk M., Milella L., Russo D., Habtemariam S., Suntar I., Rastrelli L., Daglia M., Xiao J. Flavonoid biosynthetic pathways in plants: Versatile targets for metabolic engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Scarano A., Chieppa M., Santino A. Looking at flavonoid biodiversity in horticultural crops: A colored mine with nutritional benefits. Plants. 2018;7:98. doi: 10.3390/plants7040098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sudhakaran M., Sardesai S., Dose A.I. Flavonoids: New frontier for immuno-regulation and breast cancer control. Antioxidants. 2019;8:103. doi: 10.3390/antiox8040103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pretorius J.C. Flavonoids: A review of its commercial application potential as anti-infective agents. Anti-Infect. Agents Curr. Med. Chem. 2003;2:335–353. doi: 10.2174/1568012033482971. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhao K., Yuan Y., Lin B., Miao Z., Li Z., Guo Q., Lu N. LW-215, a newly synthesized flavonoid, exhibits potent anti-angiogenic activity in vitro and in vivo. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018;642:533–541. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2017.11.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu J., Wang X., Yong H., Kan J., Jin C. Recent advances in flavonoid-grafted polysaccharides: Synthesis, structural characterization, bioactivities and potential applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018;116:1011–1025. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Camero C.M., Germanò M.P., Rapisarda A., D’Angelo V., Amira S., Benchikh F., Braca A., De Leo M. Anti-angiogenic activity of iridoids from Galium tunetanum. Rev. Bras. Farm. 2018;28:374–377. doi: 10.1016/j.bjp.2018.03.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Patel K., Kumar V., Rahman M., Verma A., Patel D.K. New insights into the medicinal importance, physiological functions and bioanalytical aspects of an important bioactive compound of foods ‘Hyperin’: Health benefits of the past, the present, the future. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2018;7:31–42. doi: 10.1016/j.bjbas.2017.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zamora-Ros R., Guinó E., Alonso M.H., Vidal C., Barenys M., Soriano A., Moreno V. Dietary flavonoids, lignans and colorectal cancer prognosis. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:14148. doi: 10.1038/srep14148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Avtar C., Bhawna G. Chemistry and Pharmacology of flavonoids—A review. [(accessed on 23 February 2021)];Indian J. Pharm. Edu. Res. 2019 53:8–20. Available online: https://www.ijper.org/article/918. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Reale G., Russo G.I., di Mauro M., Regis F., Campisi D., Giudice A.L., Marranzano M., Ragusa R., Castelli T., Cimino S. Association between dietary flavonoids intake and prostate cancer risk: A case-control study in Sicily. Complement. Ther. Med. 2018;39:14–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2018.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rienks J., Barbaresko J., Nothlings U. Association of isoflavone biomarkers with risk of chronic disease and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutr. Rev. 2017;75:616–641. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nux021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Darband S.G., Kaviani M., Yousefi B., Sadighparvar S., Pakdel F.G., Attari J.A., Mohebbi I., Naderi S., Majidinia M. Quercetin: A functional dietary flavonoid with potential chemo-preventive properties in colorectal cancer. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018;233:6544–6560. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Danihelová M., Viskupiˇcová J., Šturdík E. Lipophilization of flavonoids for their food, therapeutic and cosmetic applications. Acta Chim. 2012;5:59–69. doi: 10.2478/v10188-012-0010-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yang Z.-G., Jia L.-N., Shen Y., Ohmura A., Kitanaka S. Inhibitory effects of constituents from Euphorbia lunulata on differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells and nitric oxide production in RAW264.7 cells. Molecules. 2011;16:8305–8318. doi: 10.3390/molecules16108305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yuwei W., Xiao Y., Lingna W., Fang Z., Yongqing Z. Research progress on chemical constituents and anticancer pharmacological activities of Euphorbia lunulata Bunge. Bio. Med. Res. Int. 2020:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2020/3618941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Caballero B., Trugo L., Finglas P. Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2nd ed. Academic Press; London, UK: 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sotnikova O.M., Chagovets R.K., Litvinenko V.I. New flavanone compounds from Euphorbia stepposa. Chem. Nat. Compd. 1968;4:71–74. doi: 10.1007/BF00568014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ulubelen A., Öksüz S., Halfon B., Aynehchi Y., Mabry T.J. Flavonoids from Euphorbia larica, E. virgata, E. chamaesyce and E. magalanta. J. Nat. Prod. 1983;46:598. doi: 10.1021/np50028a037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dieter T. Significance of flavonoids in plant resistance: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2006;4:147–157. doi: 10.1007/s10311-006-0068-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ali S., Behrad D., Farzaneh H., Azadeh M., Antoni S., Seyed F., Leo R., Seyed M., Anupam B. Therapeutic potential of flavonoids in inflammatory bowel disease: A comprehensive review. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017;23:5097–5114. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i28.5097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mariam A., Samson M., Elizabeth V., Sharon V., Peter K., Alena L., Dietrich B. Flavonoids in cancer and apoptosis. Cancers. 2019;11:28. doi: 10.3390/cancers11010028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bathelemy N., Ghislain W., Justin K., Pantaleon A., Tchoukoua A., Aimé G., Igor K., Bonaventure T., Berhanu M., Victor K. Flavonoids and related compounds from the medicinal plants of Africa. J. Med. Plant. Res. 2019 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-405927-6.00009-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Panche A.N., Diwan A.D., Chandra S.R. Flavonoids: An overview. Sci. World J. 2013:16. doi: 10.1017/jns.2016.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shashank K., Abhay K. Chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids: An Overview. Sci. World J. 2013:1–16. doi: 10.1155/2013/162750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nigel C., Renee J. Flavonoids and their glycosides, including anthocyanins. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2011;28:1626. doi: 10.1039/c1np00044f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Goel G., Makkar S., Francis G., Becker K. Phorbol esters: Structure, biological activity, and toxicity in animals. Int. J. Toxicol. 2007;26:279. doi: 10.1080/10915810701464641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shi Q.W., Su X.H., Kiyota H. Chemical and pharmacological research of the plants in genus Euphorbia. Chem. Rev. 2008;108:4295. doi: 10.1021/cr078350s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rojas R., Tafolla-Arellano J.C., Martínez-Ávila G.C.G. Euphorbia antisyphilitica Zucc: A Source of Phytochemicals with Potential Applications in Industry. Plants. 2021;10:8. doi: 10.3390/plants10010008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yang T., Jun H., Yu Y., Wen-Wen L., Cong-Yuan X., Jie-Kun X., Wei-Ku Z. Euphorbia ebracteolata Hayata (Euphorbiaceae): A systematic review of its traditional uses, botany, phytochemistry, pharmacology, toxicology, and quality control. Phytochemistry. 2021;186:112736. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2021.112736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Agati G., Azzarello E., Pollastri S., Tattini M. Flavonoids as antioxidants in plants: Location and functional significance. Plant Sci. 2012;196:67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Middleton E. The flavonoids. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1984;5:335–338. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Murphy K., Chronopoulos A., Singh I. Dietary flavanols and procyanidin oligomers from cocoa (Theobroma cacao) inhibit platelet function. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003;77:1466–1473. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/77.6.1466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ke L., Hang F., Peipei Y., Lingguang Y., Qiang X., Xiang L., Liwei S., Yujun L. Structure-activity relationship of eight high content flavonoids analyzed with a preliminary assign-score method and their contribution to antioxidant ability of flavonoids-rich extract from Scutellaria. Arab. J. Chem. 2018;11:159–170. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.08.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Syed M., Ghanadiana A., Suleiman A., Sumaira H., Omer A., Jean J. Flavonol glycosides from Euphorbia microsciadia Bioss with their immunomodulatory activities. [(accessed on 14 January 2021)];Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2012 11:925–930. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24250520/ [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.De-freitsa T.J.B., Silva A.J., Kuster R. Isolation and characterization of polyphenols from Euphorbia heterophylla L. (Euphorbiaceae) leaves. Rev. Fitos. 2019;13:49–60. doi: 10.17648/2446-4775.2019.696. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhang W.J. Study on Chemical Constituents and Antitumor Activity of Euphorbia Lunulata Bge. Huaqiao University; Quanzhou, China: 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Laila A.-G. Study on Flavonoids and Triterpenoids content of some Euphorbiaceae plants. [(accessed on 14 January 2021)];J. Life Sci. 2011 5:100–107. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273351317. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sheliya M.A., Rayhana B., Ali A., Pillai K.K., Aeri V., Sharmam R. Inhibition of α-glucosidase by new prenylated flavonoids from Euphorbia hirta l. herbs. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015;176:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Maria D., Luziene A.C., Emily C., Bruno O., M´arcia V., Lívia N.C., Renata M. Bioactivity flavonoids from roots of Euphorbia tirucalli L. Phytochem. Lett. 2021;41:186–192. doi: 10.1016/j.phytol.2020.10.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Seham S., Raba M., Ahmed F., Nadia M., Sameh F., Mohamed N., Usama R.A., Elham A. Cytotoxic activity and metabolic profiling of fifteen Euphorbia Species. Metabolites. 2021;11:15. doi: 10.3390/metabo11010015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Safwat N.A., Kashef M.T., Aziz R.K., Amer K.F., Ramadan M.A. Quercetin 3-O-glucoside recovered from the wild Egyptian Sahara plant, Euphorbia paralias L., inhibits glutamine synthetase and has antimycobacterial activity. Tuberculosis. 2017;108:106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2017.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chaabi M., Freund-Michel V., Frossard N., Randriantsoa A., Andriantsitohaina R., Lobstein A. Anti-proliferative effect of Euphorbia stenoclada in human airway smooth muscle cells in culture. [(accessed on 14 January 2021)];J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007 109:134–139. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2006.07.016. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378874106003539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Li R., Wang J., Wu H.X., Li L., Wang N.L. Isolation, identification and activity determination of antioxidant active components in Euphorbia lunulata Bunge. J. Shenyang Pharm. Univ. 2011;28:25–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sevil O., Faliha G., Long-Ze L., Roberto R., Gil J.M., Pezzuto M., Geoffrey A.C. Aleppicatines A and B from Euphorbia allepica. Phytochemistry. 1996;42:473–478. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(95)00889-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wen Z., Yue-Wei G. Chemical studies on the constituents of the chinese medicinal herb Euphorbia helioscopia L. [(accessed on 14 January 2021)];Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2006 54:1037–1039. doi: 10.1248/cpb.54.1037. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16819227/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dumkow K. Kaempferol-3-glucuronide and quercetin-3-glucuronide, principal flavonoids of Euphorbia lathyris L. and their separation on acetylated polyamide. Z. Naturforsch. 1969;24:358. doi: 10.1515/znb-1969-0323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ying T., Li-Min S., Xi-Qiao L., Bin Li Q., Jun-Xing D. Anti-HBV active flavone glucosides from Euphorbia humifusa Willd. Fitoterapia. 2010;81:799–802. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2010.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Liu X., Ye W., Yu B., Zhao S., Wu H., Che C. Two new flavonol glycosides from Gymnema sylvestre and Euphorbia ebracteolata. Carbohydr. Res. 2004;339:891–895. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2003.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tadahiro N., Li-Yan W., Kouji K., Susumu K. Flavonoids that mimic human ligands from the whole plants of Euphorbia lunulata. [(accessed on 24 January 2021)];Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2005 53:305–308. doi: 10.1248/cpb.53.305. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15744103/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Veena S., Pracheta J. Extraction, isolation and identification of flavonoid from Euphorbia neriifolia leaves. Arab. J. Chem. 2017;10:509–514. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.08.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Cheng J., Han W., Wang Z., Shao Y., Wang Y., Zhang Y., Li Z., Xu X., Zhang Y. Hepatocellular carcinoma growth is inhibited by Euphorbia helioscopia L. extract in nude mice xenografts. Bio. Med. Res. Int. 2015:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2015/601015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Abu-reidah I.M., Ali-shtayeh M.S., Jamous R.M., Arr´aez-rom´an D., Segura-carretero A. HPLC–DAD–ESI-MS/MS screening of bioactive components from Rhus coriaria L. (Sumac) fruits. Food Chem. 2015;166:179–191. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Markham K.R., Ternai B. 13C NMR of flavonoids-ii flavonoids other than flavone and flavonol aglycones. Tetrahedron. 1976;32:2607–2612. doi: 10.1016/0040-4020(76)88036-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ahn B.T., Lee K.S. Phenolic compounds from Euphorbia ebracteolata. Saengyak Hakhoechi. 1996;27:136–141. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Heba I., Abd E.-M. Flavonoid and phenolic acid compounds in Euphorbia bivonae Steud roots. [(accessed on 2 February 2021)];Curr. Sci. Int. 2015 4:668–676. Available online: http://www.curresweb.com/csi/csi/2015/668-676.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Liu C., Sun H., Wang W.T. Study on chemical constituents of Euphorbia lunulata bge. J. Chin. Med. Mater. 2015;3:514–517. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hassana G.K., Omera M.A., Babadoust S., Najata D.D. Flavonoids from Euphorbia condylocarpa roots. [(accessed on 2 February 2021)];Int. J. Chem. Bio. Sci. 2014 6:56–60. Available online: http://www.iscientific.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/8-IJCBS-14-06-05.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Amani S.A., Nabilah A., John E., Reham M., Mohamed E. Antiulcerogenic activities of the extracts and isolated flavonoids of Euphorbia cuneata Vahl. Phytother. Res. 2013;27:126–130. doi: 10.1002/ptr.4872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Shang T.M., Wang L., Liang X.T. Study on the chemical constituents of Euphorbia Lunulata. J. Chem. 1979;37:119–128. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lee S.C., Ahn B.T., Park W.Y., Lee S.H., Ro J.S., Lee K.S., Ryu E.K. Pharmacognostic study on Euphorbia ebracteolata. Flavonoid constituents. Korean J. Pharmacogn. 1992;23:126–131. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Tarek B., Hichema A., Khalfallaha A., Kabouchea Z., Kabouchea I., Jaime B., Christian B. A New alkaloid and flavonoids from the aerial parts of Euphorbia guyoniana. [(accessed on 2 February 2021)];Nat. Prod. Commun. 2010 5:1–3. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20184016/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Wu Y., Qu W., Geng D., Liang J.-Y., Luo Y.-L. Phenols and flavonoids from the aerial part of Euphorbia hirta. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2012;10:40–42. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1009.2012.00040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Abida T., Ismat N., Hifsa M. Isolation of flavonols from Euphorbia wallichii by preparative High Performance Liquid Chromatography. [(accessed on 2 February 2021)];Nat. Sci. 2009 7:1–3. Available online: http://www.sciencepub.net/nature. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Mueller R., Pohl R. Flavonol glycosides of Euphorbia amygdaloides and their quantitative determination at various stages of plant development. 5. Flavonoids of native Euphorbiaceae. Planta Med. 1970;18:114–129. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1099757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Chai G.S. Study on the chemical constituents of the seeds of Euphorbia Fischeriana Steud and Euphorbia Esula Linn. Qiqihar University, Qiqihar, China. Chemo-prevention. Food Chem. 2013;138:2099–2107. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Salehi B., Iriti M., Vitalini E., Antolak H., Pawlikowska E., Kręgiel D., Sharifi-rad J., Oyeleye S.I., Ademiluyi A.O., Czopek K., et al. Euphorbia-derived natural products with potential for use in health maintenance. Biomolecules. 2019;9:337. doi: 10.3390/biom9080337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ozbílgín S., Saltan G. Uses of some Euphorbia species in traditional medicine in turkey and their biological activities. Turk. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012;9:241–256. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Liu Z.G., Li Z.L., Bai J., Meng D.L., Li N., Pei Y.H., Zhao F., Hua H.M. Anti-inflammatory diterpenoids from the roots of Euphorbia ebracteolata. J. Nat. Prod. 2014;77:792–799. doi: 10.1021/np400873v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Halaweish F., Kronberg S., Rice J. Rodent and ruminant ingestive response to flavonoids in Euphorbia esula. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003;5:1073–1082. doi: 10.1023/A:1023869220586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kadiyala G., Anbarasu K., Kadali R., Jayanthi S., Vishwanath B.S., Gurunathan J. Quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside from Euphorbia hirta protects against snake venom induced toxicity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2016;1860:1528–1540. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.03.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Noori M., Chehreghani A., Kaveh M. Flavonoids of 17 species of Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) Iran. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2009;91:631–641. doi: 10.1080/02772240802389936. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Byung T.A., Kapjin O., Jai S.R., Kyong S.L. A New Flavonoid from Euphorbia ebracteolata. Planta Med. 1996;62:383–384. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-957918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Reham H., Norbert K., Peter W., Ágnes K., István Z., Péter O., László T., Judit H., Andrea V. Isolation and pharmacological investigation of compounds from Euphorbia matabelensis. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2019:1–5. doi: 10.1177/1934578X19863509. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Martinez V.M., Ramirez A.T., Lazcano M., Bye R. Anti-inflammatory Active Compounds from then-hexane extract of Euphorbia hirta. J. Mex. Chem. Soc. 1999;43:103–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Bahar A., Tawfeq A., Jaber S.m., Kehel T. Isolation, antihypertensive activity and structure activity relationship of flavonoids from medicinal plants. [(accessed on 2 February 2021)];Indian J. Chem. 2005 44:400–404. Available online: http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/8947/1/IJCB%2044B(2)%20400-404.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ko W.C., Wang H.L., Lei C.B., Shih C.H., Chung M.I., Lin C.N. Mechanisms of relaxant action of 3-O-methylquercetin in isolated guinea pig trachea. Planta Medica. 2002;68:30–35. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-20059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Haggag E.G., Abou-Moustafa M.A., Boucher W., Theoharides T.C. The effect of herbal water-extract on histamine release from mast cells and on allergic asthma. [(accessed on 2 February 2021)];J. Herb. Pharmacother. 2003 3:41–54. doi: 10.1080/J157v03n04_03. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15277119/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Jiang S. The Inhibition of Lung Cancer Active Ingredient Extracts of Euphorbia Lunulata and Its Mechanism. Ocean University of China; Qingdao, China: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Gao F., Fu Z., Tian H., He Z. The Euphorbia lunulata extract inhibits proliferation of human hepatoma Hep-G2 cells and induces apoptosis. [(accessed on 2 February 2021)];J. BUON. 2013 18:491–495. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23818367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hameed A., Hafizur R.M., Hussain N. Eriodictyol stimulates insulin secretion through cAMP/PKA signaling pathway in mice islets. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2018;820:245–255. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Campos P.M., Prudente A.S., Horinouchi C.D. Inhibitory effect of GB-2a (I3-naringenin-II8-eriodictyol) on melanogenesis. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015;174:224–229. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Lee J.K. Anti-inflammatory effects of eriodictyol in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated raw 264.7 murine macrophages. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2011;34:671–679. doi: 10.1007/s12272-011-0418-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Whelan L.C., Ryan M.F. Ethanolic extracts of Euphorbia and other ethnobotanical species as inhibitors of human tumour cellgrowth. Phytomedicine. 2003;10:53–58. doi: 10.1078/094471103321648665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wongprayoon P., Charoensuksai P. Cytotoxic and anti-migratory activities from hydroalcoholic extract of Euphorbia lactea Haw against HN22 cell line. Thai J. Pharm. Sci. 2018;13:69–77. doi: 10.14456/tbps.2018.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Villanueva J., Quirós L.M., Castañón S. Purification and partial characterization of a ribosome-inactivating protein from the latex of Euphorbia trigona Miller with cytotoxic activity toward human cancer cell lines. Phytomedicine. 2015;22:689–695. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2015.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Waczuk E.P., Kamdem J.P., Abolaji A.O., Meinerz D.F., Bueno D.C., do Nascimento Gonzaga T.K., do Canto Dorow T.S., Boligon A.A., Athayde M.L., da Rocha J.B.T. Euphorbia tirucalli aqueous extract induces cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and changes in antioxidant gene expression in human leukocytes. Toxicol. Res. 2015;4:739–748. doi: 10.1039/C4TX00122B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Hou D.X., Kumamoto T. Flavonoids as protein kinase inhibitors for cancer chemoprevention: Direct binding and molecular modeling. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2010;13:691–719. doi: 10.1089/ars.2009.2816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Lolli G., Cozza G., Mazzorana M., Tibaldi E., Cesaro L., Donella-Deana A., Pinna L.A. Inhibition of protein kinase CK2 by flavonoids and tyrphostins. A structural insight. Biochemistry. 2012;51:6097–6107. doi: 10.1021/bi300531c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Yokoyama T., Kosaka Y., Mizuguchi M. Structural insight into the interactions between death-associated protein kinase 1 and natural flavonoids. J. Med. Chem. 2015;58:7400–7408. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Peng H.L., Huang W.C., Cheng S.C., Liou C.J. Fisetin inhibits the generation of inflammatory mediators in interleukin-1β-induced human lung epithelial cells by suppressing the Nf-κb and Erk1/2 pathways. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2018;60:202–210. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Atashpour S., Fouladdel S., Movahhed T.K., Barzegar E., Ghahremani M.H., Ostad S.N., Azizi E. Quercetin induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in CD133+ cancer stem cells of human colorectal HT29 cancer cell line and enhances anticancer effects of doxorubicin. [(accessed on 10 February 2021)];Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2015 18:635. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26351552. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Yang P.-W., Lu Z.-Y., Pan Q., Chen T.-T., Feng X.-J., Wang S.-M., Pan Y.-C., Zhu M.-H., Zhang S.-H. MicroRNA-6809–5p mediates luteolin-induced anticancer effects against hepatoma by targeting flotillin. Phytomedicine. 2019;57:18–29. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Guo Y.Q., Tang G.H., Lou L.L., Li W., Zhang B., Liu B., Yin S. Prenylated flavonoids as potent phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors from Morus alba: Isolation, modification, and structure-activity relationship study. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018;144:758–766. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.12.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Choene M., Motadi L. Validation of the antiproliferative effects of Euphorbia tirucalli extracts in breast cancer cell lines. Mol. Biol. 2016;50:98–110. doi: 10.1134/S0026893316010040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Devi K.P., Rajavel T., Nabavi S.F., Setzer W.N., Ahmadi A., Mansouri K., Nabavi S.M. Hesperidin: A promising anticancer agent from nature. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015;76:582–589. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.07.051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Ersoz M., Erdemir A., Duranoglu D., Uzunoglu D., Arasoglu T., Derman S., Mansuroglu B. Comparative evaluation of hesperetin loaded nanoparticles for anticancer activity against C6 glioma cancer cells. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2019;47:319–329. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2018.1556213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Alsayari A., Muhsinah A.B., Hassan M.Z., Ahsan M.J., Alshehri J.A., Begum N. Aurone: A biologically attractive scaffold as anticancer agent. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019;166:417–431. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.01.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Yahfoufi N., Alsadi N., Jambi M., Matar C. The immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory role of polyphenols. Nutrients. 2018;10:1618. doi: 10.3390/nu10111618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Kumar R., Caruso I.P., Ullah A., Cornelio M.L., Fossey M.A. Exploring the binding mechanism of flavonoid quercetin to phospholipase A2: Fluorescence spectroscopy and computational approach. Eur. J. Exp. Biol. 2017;7:33. doi: 10.21767/2248-9215.100033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Novo M., Hessel H., Fabri C., Ramos da Cruz Costa C., de Oliveira Toyama D., Domingues Passero L.F., Dalastra Laurenti M., Hikari Toyama M. Evaluation of rhamnetin as an inhibitor of the pharmacological effect of secretory phospholipase A2. Molecules. 2017;22:1441. doi: 10.3390/molecules22091441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.González Mosquera D.M., Hernández Ortega Y., Fernández P.L., González Y., Doens D., Vander Heyden Y., Pieters L. Flavonoids from Boldoa purpurascens inhibit proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) and the expression of COX-2. Phytother. Res. 2018;32:1750–1754. doi: 10.1002/ptr.6104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Li Y., Yu Q., Zhao W., Zhang J., Liu W., Huang M., Zeng X. Oligomeric proanthocyanidins attenuate airway inflammation in asthma by inhibiting dendritic cells maturation. Mol. Immunol. 2017;91:209–217. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2017.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Lin X., Lin C.H., Zhao T., Zuo D., Ye Z., Liu L., Lin M.T. Quercetin protects against heat stroke-induced myocardial injury in male rats: Antioxidative and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. Chemico-Biol. Interact. 2017;265:47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2017.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Galleggiante V., De Santis S., Cavalcanti E., Scarano A., De Benedictis M., Serino G., Chieppa M. Dendritic cells modulate iron homeostasis and inflammatory abilities following quercetin exposure. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017;23:2139–2146. doi: 10.2174/1381612823666170112125355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Gong J.H., Shin D., Han S.Y., Kim J.L., Kang Y.H. Kaempferol suppresses eosionphil infiltration and airway inflammation in airway epithelial cells and in mice with allergic asthma. J. Nutr. 2011;142:47–56. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.150748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Weng Z., Patel A.B., Panagiotidou S., Theoharides T.C. The novel flavone tetramethoxyluteolin is a potent inhibitor of human mast cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015;135:1044–1052. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.10.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Weng Z., Zhang B., Asadi S., Sismanopoulos N., Butcher A., Fu X., Theoharides T.C. Quercetin is more effective than cromolyn in blocking human mast cell cytokine release and inhibits contact dermatitis and photosensitivity in humans. PLoS ONE. 2012:7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Kim D.H., Jung W.S., Kim M.E., Lee H.W., Youn H.Y., Seon J.K., Lee J.S. Genistein inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokines in human mast cell activation through the inhibition of the ERK pathway. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2014;34:1669–1674. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2014.1956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Veena S., Pracheta J. Protective assessment of Euphorbia neriifolia and its isolated flavonoid against N nitrosodiethylamine-induced Hepatic carcinogenesis in male mice: A histopathological analysis. Toxicol. Int. 2015:1–8. doi: 10.4103/0971-6580.128790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Lizhen Z., Chu W., Qiuxia M., Qin T., Yu N., Wei N. Phytochemicals of Euphorbia lathyris L. and their antioxidant activities. Molecules. 2017;22:1335. doi: 10.3390/molecules22081335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Kerry N.L., Abbey M. Red wine and fractionated phenolic compounds prepared from red wine inhibits low density lipoprotein oxidation in vitro. [(accessed on 1 March 2021)];Atherosclerosis. 1997 135:93–102. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9150(97)00156-1. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9395277/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Hanan M., Ali S., Afaf E.A., Sayed A.E., Wagdi I.A., Wafaa H.B., Hanaa M. Nephroprotective and antioxidant activities of ethyl acetate fraction of Euphorbia geniculata Ortega family Euphorbiaceae. Arab. J. Chem. 2020;13:7843–7850. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.09.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Claudia M., Furlan K., Pereira S., Martha D., Sedano-Partida L., Barbosa D., Deborah Y.A.C., Maria L., Giuseppina N., Paul E., et al. Flavonoids and antioxidant potential of nine Argentinian species of Croton (Euphorbiaceae) Braz. J. Bot. 2015;38:693–702. doi: 10.1007/s40415-014-0115-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Mishra B., Priyadarsini K., Kumar M., Unnikrishnan M., Mohan H. Effect of O-glycosilation on the antioxidant activity, free radical reactions of a plant flavonoid, chrysoeriol. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003;11:2677–2685. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0896(03)00232-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.You H.J., Ahn H.J., Ji G.E. Transformation of rutin to antiproliferative quercetin-3-glucoside by Aspergillus niger. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010;58:10886–10892. doi: 10.1021/jf102871g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Juliana F., Jacyra A.S., Júlia M.F., Angela K.C., Yamara A.S.M., Elizabeth C.G., Denise V.T., Arnóbio A.S., Silvana M.Z., Matheus F. Comparison of two Jatropha species (Euphorbiaceae) used popularly to treat snakebites in Northeastern Brazil: Chemical profile, inhibitory activity against Bothrops erythromelas venom and antibacterial activity. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018;213:12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2017.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Ajayi E.I.O., Adeleke M.A., Adewumi T.Y., Adeyemi A.A. Antiplasmodial activities of ethanol extracts of Euphorbia hirta whole plant and Vernonia amygdalina leaves in Plasmodium berghei-infected mice. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2017;11:831–835. doi: 10.1016/j.jtusci.2017.01.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Ashraf A., sarfraz R.A., Rashid M.A., Shahid M. Antioxidant, antimicrobial, antitumor, and cytotoxic activities of an important medicinal plant (Euphorbia royleana) from Pakistan. J. Food Drug Anal. 2015;23:109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2014.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Boumaza S., Bouchenak O., Yahiaoui K., Toubal S., El haddad D., Arab K. Effect of the aqueous extract of Euphorbia guyoniana (euphorbiaceae) on pathogenic bacteria from land-based sources. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2018;16:3767–3781. doi: 10.15666/aeer/1604_37673781. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Beatriz G., Hélcio S., Paulo N., Bandeira T., Helena S., Rodrigues C., Matos F., Nascimento G.C., de Carvalho R., Braz-Filhoe M.R., et al. Coutinhoa Evaluation of antibacterial and enhancement of antibiotic action by the flavonoid kaempferol 7-O-β-D-(6″-O-cumaroyl)-glucopyranoside isolated from Croton piauhiensis müll. Microb. Pathog. 2020;143:104144. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Ali R., Mat Houghton P.J., Raman A., Hoult J.R.S. Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities of extracts and constituents of Oroxylum indicum (L.) Vent. Phytomedicine. 1998;5:375–381. doi: 10.1016/s0944-7113(98)80020-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Alcaráz L.E., Blanco S.E., Puig O.N., Tomás F., Ferretti F.H. Antibacterial activity of flavonoids against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Theor. Biol. 2000;205:231–240. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Edziri H., Mastouri M., Mahjoub M.A., Mighri Z., Mahjoub A., Verschaeve L. Antibacterial, antifungal and cytotoxic activities of two flavonoids from Retama raetam flowers. Molecules. 2012;17:7284–7293. doi: 10.3390/molecules17067284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Jamil S. Antimicrobial Flavonoids from Artocarpus anisophyllus Miq and Artocarpus lowii King. J. Teknol. 2014;71:95–99. doi: 10.11113/jt.v71.2699. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Farooq S., Wahab A.T., Fozing C., Rahman A.U., Choudhary M.I. Artonin I inhibits multidrug resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and potentiates the action of inactive antibiotics in vitro. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014;117:996–1011. doi: 10.1111/jam.12595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Cushnie T.T., Lamb A.J. Detection of galangin-induced cytoplasmic membrane damage in Staphylococcus aureus by measuring potassium loss. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005;101:243–248. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Cushnie T.T., Lamb A.J. Recent advances in understanding the antibacterial properties of flavonoids. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2011;38:99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Ohemeng K.A., Schwender C.F., Fu K.P., Barrett J.F. DNA gyrase inhibitory and antibacterial activity of some flavones. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1993;3:225–230. doi: 10.1016/S0960-894X(01)80881-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Xie Y., Yang W., Tang F., Chen X., Ren L. Antibacterial activities of flavonoids: Structure-activity relationship and mechanism. Curr. Med. Chem. 2015;22:132–149. doi: 10.2174/0929867321666140916113443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Pharmaceuticals are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES