Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We assessed MR imaging, specifically contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MP-RAGE), in evaluating retrograde venous drainage in patients with intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) that may result in catastrophic venous infarction or hemorrhage.
METHODS: Twenty-one patients with angiographically proved dAVFs underwent nonenhanced spin-echo (SE) and fast SE imaging, 3D fast imaging with steady-state precession, and enhanced SE and 3D MP-RAGE imaging. Retrograde venous drainage was categorized as cerebral cortical, deep cerebral, posterior fossa medullary, ophthalmic, or spinal venous. We assessed retrograde venous drainage and graded its severity. MR imaging and angiographic severities were correlated. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic utility of each technique compared with conventional angiography. We retrospectively correlated angiograms and MR images.
RESULTS: Enhanced 3D MP-RAGE and T1-weighted SE images had higher diagnostic accuracy higher than nonenhanced images, especially when retrograde drainage involved cerebral cortical, posterior fossa, and spinal veins. Correlation of severity for enhanced MP-RAGE images and enhanced T1-weighted images with angiograms was good to excellent and better than that with nonenhanced images. All sequences had low diagnostic accuracy when drainage was via deep cerebral veins. On retrospective review, 3D MP-RAGE images showed two thrombotic inferior petrosal sinuses.
CONCLUSION: Enhanced MR images were superior to nonenhanced images in assessing retrograde venous drainage in intracranial dAVFs. Enhanced 3D MP-RAGE is superior to enhanced T1-weighted SE imaging for determining the route and severity of venous reflux because of its increased spatial resolution and ability to contiguously delineate the venous system.
Dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs), or dural shunts, were also called dural arteriovenous malformations before it was understood that almost all were acquired lesions (1). These lesions may cause various signs and symptoms ranging from pulsatile tinnitus to intracranial hemorrhage (1–10). dAVFs are due to impaired venous outflow that results in retrograde venous drainage and venous hypertension and, eventually, venous infarction with hemorrhage. Nonaggressive neurologic symptoms, such as isolated headache, vertigo, and bruit, are observed in more than 50% of patients with dAVFs, whereas aggressive neurologic symptoms intracranial hypertension, intracranial hemorrhage, focal neurologic deficits, and seizures are less common. The incidence of intracranial hemorrhage, the most critical symptom, is 7%–27% in patients with dAVF (1–3).
In patients with intracranial dAVFs and retrograde venous drainage, two major classifications based on the presence of retrograde leptomeningeal venous drainages have been proposed (2, 4). An increase in the direct retrograde venous drainage into a cortical vein was significantly related to a high incidence of hemorrhage (2, 8, 11, 12).
Although the diagnosis and assessment of dAVFs are based primarily on the results of conventional angiography, MR imaging is useful (13, 14). On T2-weighted spin-echo (SE) images, retrograde venous drainage is identified as prominent flow voids in the subarachnoid space. The involved sinuses are demonstrated as high-signal intensity on three-dimensional (3D) fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) (14). Two-dimensional time-of-flight venography and contrast-enhanced 3D magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MP-RAGE) sequences aid in the evaluation of veins and dural sinuses (15). Although different MR images can be used to assess normal and abnormal dural sinuses and veins shown in these reports, the sequence that is most appropriate for assessing retrograde venous drainage in patients with intracranial dAVFs remains unknown.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced SE, 3D FISP, and contrast-enhanced 3D MP-RAGE images in depicting retrograde venous drainage in patients with intracranial dAVFs.
Methods
Patients
Twenty-one consecutive patients (five men, 16 women; age range, 50–78 years; mean age, 64.6 years) with 21 angiographically proved dAVFs underwent MR imaging, including nonenhanced and enhanced SE or fast SE, 3D FISP, and enhanced 3D MP-RAGE sequences. Conventional angiography and MR examinations were performed within 0–65 days (mean, 13.6 days) of each other. All patients were examined for suspected dAVFs. Their clinical symptoms were exophthalmos and chemosis (n = 17), tinnitus (n = 2), dementia (n = 1), and worsening of visual acuity (n = 1).
Conventional Angiography
Conventional angiography was performed by using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with bilateral selective catheterization of the external carotid arteries (ECAs) and internal carotid arteries (ICAs) and vertebral arteries (VAs). Fistula sites were the tent (n = 1) and the unilateral cavernous (n = 14), bilateral cavernous (n = 4), transverse (n = 1), and sigmoid (n = 1) sinuses. All 21 patients had retrograde venous drainage. The routes were the deep venous system (n = 11) and the superior ophthalmic (n = 12), cerebral cortical (n = 11), posterior fossa (n = 7), and spinal (n = 3) veins (Table 1).
TABLE 1:
Patient/Age (years)/Sex | Fistula Site | Feeding Artery | Obstructed Petrosal Sinus | Retrograde Drainage Veins |
---|---|---|---|---|
1/69/F | R/L CS | R/L ECA, ICA | R/L superior, inferior | Cortical, deep |
2/66/F | R/L CS | R/L ECA, ICA | R/L superior, inferior | Cortical, deep |
3/58/F | R/L CS | R/L ECA, ICA | R/L superior, inferior | Cortical, deep, superior ophthalmic, PF |
4/62/F | L CS | R/L ECA, ICA | L superior, R/L inferior | Deep, superior ophthalmic, PF, SV |
5/77/M | L CS | R/L ICA | R/L superior, inferior | Cortical, deep |
6/51/F | R CS | R/L ECA, ICA | R/L superior, inferior | Superior ophthalmic |
7/62/F | R CS | R/L ECA, ICA | R/L superior, inferior | Deep, superior ophthalmic |
8/62/F | L CS | R/L ECA, ICA | R/L superior, inferior | Superior ophthalmic |
9/76/F | R/L CS | R ICA, R/L ECA | R/L superior, inferior | Cortical, deep, superior ophthalmic, PF |
10.52/M | R CS | R/L ECA | Not applicable | Cortical |
11/50/F | L CS | L ECA | Not applicable | Superior ophthalmic |
12/52/F | L CS | L ECA | R/L superior, inferior | Deep |
13/70/F | L CS | L ECA, ICA | R/L superior, inferior | Superior ophthalmic |
14/77/F | L CS | L ECA, ICA | L superior, R/L inferior | Cortical, deep |
15/70/M | Tent | L ECA, ICA; R/L VA | a | Cortical, deep |
16/64/M | L CS | L ECA, ICA | R/L superior, inferior | PF |
17/50/F | L transverse sinus | L ECA, ICA; L | a | Cortical, deep, PF, SV, superior ophthalmic |
18/70/F | L CS | R ECA, ICA | Not applicable | Superior ophthalmic, PF |
19/78/F | L CS | R/L ECA, R, ICA | L inferior | Cortical, superior ophthalmic, SV |
20/70/M | L sigmoid sinus | L ECA | a | Cortical, PF |
21/71/F | R CS | R ECA, ICA | L inferior | Superior ophthalmic |
Note.—PF, leptomeningeal vein of the posterior fossa; SV, spinal vein; VA, verbetral arteries.
Obstruction was in the L sigmoid sinus and superior sagittal sinus (patient 15), R transverse sinus (patient 17), or R transverse sinus (patient 20).
Two radiologists (Y.K., M.K.) graded the severity of the retrograde cortical venous drainage in consensus, as follows: grade 0 = no retrograde cortical venous drainage, grade 1 = involved volume of 0–25%, grade 2 = 26–50%, and grade 3 = >50%. The volume of involved cortical veins was visually determined visually relative to the whole of the cortical veins on the anteroposterior and lateral angiograms. Ten patients had no retrograde cortical venous drainage, two patients had grade 1 drainage, seven patients grade 2, and two patients had grade 3.
In 15 patients with carotid cavernous fistulas, the superior and/or inferior petrosal sinuses were not seen during the venous phase. The superior sagittal sinus was not seen in one patient with a tentorial dAVF, and the sigmoid and transverse sinuses were not visualized in two patients with transverse and/or sigmoid sinus dAVFs.
MR Imaging
MR examinations were performed with a 1.5-T superconducting unit (Magnetom Vision; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). In all patients, axial T1-weighted (TR/TE/NEX = 627–690/14–17/1) SE and T2-weighted (3700/96/1, echo train length = 7) fast SE images of the entire brain were obtained. SE images were obtained with a 21-cm field of view (FOV) and a 224 × 256 matrix. Section thickness was 5 mm with a 1-mm intersection gap. In 19 patients, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted SE images were also obtained after the administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg; Magnevist; Nihon Schering, Osaka, Japan) with a same parameters as those used for nonenhanced T1-weighted imaging.
All patients underwent 3D FISP imaging. The parameters were TR/TE = 32/6.5, 20° flip angle, 64-mm slab thickness, 64 partitions, 20-cm FOV, and 192–256 × 256–512 matrix. Zero-fill interpolation was applied in the section selection direction, and the section thickness was 0.5 mm. The cavernous sinus (CS) was located at the center of the volume slab.
Contrast-enhanced 3D MP-RAGE images were also obtained in all patients, with TR/TE/TI = 13.5/7/3000, 15° flip angle, 135-mm slab thickness, 108 partitions, 20-cm FOV, and 224 × 256 matrix. The section thickness was 1.3 mm. The center of the slab was same as that of the 3D FISP images.
Image Interpretation
Two readers (M.Y., K.K.) who were cognizant of the presence of dural fistulas but not their sites reviewed the SE, 3D FISP, and enhanced 3D MP-RAGE images in random order. During their assessment of individual images, they did not have access to information obtained with other techniques or conventional angiography or from the clinical records. They recorded the presence of retrograde venous drainage, as shown on all images. When this drainage was identified, its route was noted by using conventional angiographic classification, and its severity was assessed.
Diagnostic criteria for retrograde venous drainage were abnormal flow voids on T2-weighted fast SE images, hyperintensity of veins on 3D FISP images, and laterality of the vein size on nonenhanced and enhanced T1-weighted SE and enhanced 3D MP-RAGE images. To differentiate veins from arteries, the readers paid careful attention to the anatomic location and tortuosity of the vessels.
In the retrospective qualitative study, two radiologists (Y.K., M.K.) who were cognizant of the patient’s history interpreted the MR image and angiogram together. They assessed the patency of the dural sinuses, particularly in the superior and inferior petrosal sinuses, and noted abnormal parenchymal intensity associated with venous congestion.
Data Analysis
First, to determine interobserver variability, the degree of agreement between the observers was analyzed by using κ statistics. κ values of up to 0.4 were recorded as positive, but poor correlation, 0.41–0.75 was good and >0.75 was excellent. Second, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each imaging technique were calculated to assess its diagnostic utility compared with that of conventional angiography as the standard. In patients with retrograde cortical venous drainage, we used κ statistics to compare its severity on conventional angiograms and on the various MR images.
Results
Confidence levels for image interpretation by the two readers were 0.9–1.0 for T1-weighted images, 0.76–0.95 for T2-weighted images, 0.73–1.0 for enhanced T1-weighted images, 0.81–1.0 for 3D FISP images, and 0.65–1.0 for enhanced 3D MP-RAGE images. All κ values, except for those from the evaluation of ophthalmic veins on enhanced T1-weighted image and of deep veins on enhanced MP-RAGE images, were more than 0.75. Table 2 shows the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each imaging technique.
TABLE 2:
Veina | Sensitivity(%) | Specificity(%) | Accuracy(%) |
---|---|---|---|
Cortical | |||
T1 weighted | 50 | 100 | 73.8 |
T2 weighted | 77.3 | 100 | 88.1 |
CE T1 weighted | 100 | 100 | 100 |
3D FISP | 77.3 | 86.7 | 85.7 |
3D CE MP-RAGE | 100 | 90 | 95.3 |
Ophthalmic | |||
T1 weighted | 91.7 | 100 | 95.2 |
T2 weighted | 66.7 | 94.5 | 78.6 |
CE T1 weighted | 40.0 | 100 | 68.5 |
3D FISP | 45.9 | 100 | 69.1 |
3D CE MP-RAGE | 91.7 | 83.4 | 88.1 |
Deep | |||
T1 weighted | 13.4 | 100 | 54.8 |
T2 weighted | 47.3 | 100 | 69.1 |
CE T1 weighted | 34.7 | 95.0 | 68.4 |
3D FISP | 46.8 | 95.5 | 69.1 |
3D CE MP-RAGE | 51.4 | 85.0 | 69.1 |
Posterior | |||
T1 weighted | 25.9 | 100 | 73.8 |
T2 weighted | 25.9 | 100 | 73.8 |
CE T1 weighted | 50.0 | 96.5 | 81.6 |
3D FISP | 18.8 | 96.5 | 69.1 |
3D CE MP-RAGE | 59.0 | 82.3 | 76.2 |
Spinal | |||
T1 weighted | 0 | 100 | 85.7 |
T2 weighted | 16.7 | 100 | 85.7 |
CE T1 weighted | 75.0 | 100 | 94.8 |
3D FISP | 0 | 100 | 85.7 |
3D CE MP-RAGE | 100 | 100 | 100 |
CE = contrast enhanced.
For the evaluation of cerebral retrograde cortical venous drainage, enhanced T1-weighted SE and enhanced 3D MP-RAGE images yielded diagnostic accuracy higher than that of the other techniques (Fig 1). For the evaluation of the ophthalmic vein, nonenhanced T1-weighted SE and 3D MP RAGE images were superior (Fig 2). All sequences had relatively low diagnostic accuracy for the evaluation of deep veins (Fig 3). Enhanced 3D MP-RAGE images were more sensitive than the other images for evaluating posterior fossa and spinal veins (Figs 3 and 4), although their specificity for the veins in the posterior fossa was relatively low. Diagnostic accuracy for all reflux routes was 85.7% on enhanced MP-RAGE, 82.7% on enhanced T1-weighted SE, 79.1% on T2-weighted fast SE, 76.7% on nonenhanced T1-weighted SE, and 75.7% on 3D FISP imaging. In evaluating the severity of cortical retrograde venous drainage, good-to-excellent correlation was observed among enhanced MP-RAGE images, enhanced T1-weighted images, and angiograms for both readers. κ values were >0.594 with both MR sequences. κ values for the other sequences were 0.132–0.465.
In our retrospective evaluation, enhanced MP-RAGE images were particularly useful for assessing the small veins of the posterior fossa and for identifying thrombosis in the dural sinuses. In four patients, enhanced 3D MP-RAGE images showed filling defects in the inferior petrosal sinuses. In patients 1 and 3, the sinuses were hypointense on 3D FISP images but not opacified conventional angiographs, even in the late venous phase; this appearance was considered to reflect sinus thrombosis (Fig 5). In patients 6 and 21, the inferior petrosal sinuses were hyperintense on 3D FISP images; high flow in the sinuses was confirmed on conventional angiographs. With respect to parenchymal changes, the temporal white matter adjacent to the area of retrograde venous drainage was hyperintense on T2-weighted fast SE images in patients 19 and 20.
Discussion
Impairment of venous outflow in patients with dAVFs results in retrograde venous drainage and venous hypertension and eventual venous infarction with hemorrhage. Two major classifications have been proposed on the basis of retrograde leptomeningeal venous drainage. Cognard et al (2) reviewed findings in 205 patients and found a relationship between the type of retrograde venous drainage and the clinical presentation. Patients with dAVFs draining directly into a cortical vein had a high incidence of hemorrhage, particularly those with venous ectasia. Other groups that examined the correlation between the severity of retrograde venous drainage and clinical presentations showed that direct retrograde leptomeningeal venous drainage results in an incidence of hemorrhage higher than that of sinosal drainage with retrograde leptomeningeal venous drainage (4, 6–12).
Evaluation of retrograde venous drainage on conventional angiography requires good visualization in the venous phase. Retrograde venous drainage is identified as abnormally dilated, tortuous, engorged pial or medullary veins in the late venous phase; this is known as the pseudophlebitic pattern. Other conventional angiographic findings in patients with dAVFs are focal regions of delayed circulation and venous rerouting to the orbit or to transosseous veins. Abnormally dilated pial or medullary veins in patients with dAVFs are identified as flow void on T2-weighted SE images. Willinsky et al (13) attempted to correlate the severity of retrograde venous drainage determined on T2-weighted SE images with the clinical presentation and suggested that evidence of moderate or severe retrograde venous drainage may be useful for identifying a subgroup of patients in whom aggressive symptoms or signs might develop.
Our study showed that enhanced MR images were superior to nonenhanced images for evaluating retrograde venous drainage, probably because undilated veins and slow flow retrograde venous drainage may not be detected with T2-weighted SE images. Both enhanced 3D MP-RAGE and T1-weighted SE images had high diagnostic accuracy, not only for the detection of retrograde cortical venous drainage but also for its severity. Although enhanced 3D MP-RAGE images were highly sensitive, their specificity was slightly lower than that of enhanced T1-weighted SE images.
3D MP-RAGE is a small–flip angle, gradient-recalled-echo sequence in which a 3D Fourier transformation acquisition is implemented with a 180° inversion preparation pulse. The resulting sequence yields heavily T1-weighted contrast; a relatively high signal-to-noise ratio; thin, continuous images with postprocessing capability; rapid acquisition times; and depiction of flow-related enhancement (16–20). Enhanced 3D MP-RAGE sequence relies not only on time-of-flight effects but also on the T1-reducing effect of gadolinium to depict the flow (21). Although these effects are beneficial for identifying normal vasculature on enhanced 3D MP RAGE images, it may make the differentiation of normal and affected veins more difficult than it is on enhanced T1-weighted SE images. Therefore, enhanced 3D MP-RAGE imaging is slightly less specific than enhanced T1-weighted SE imaging.
3D FISP and T2-weighted SE images had relatively high diagnostic accuracy in patients with cerebral retrograde cortical venous drainage. On 3D FISP images, high-flow vessels had high signal intensity attributable to flow-related enhancement, which is advantageous for evaluating high-flow retrograde venous drainage (14, 22). Although 3D FISP images have a high spatial resolution (0.5 mm) and detectability of high flow is high, they have drawbacks: their acquisition time is long; the slab thickness is limited; and, on peripheral images in the slab, the signal intensity of even high-flow vessels is decreased because of saturation effect. These limitations may account for the lower diagnostic accuracy of 3D FISP images than on enhanced images.
In the evaluation of the ophthalmic vein, enhanced 3D MP-RAGE images had relatively high diagnostic accuracy. On enhanced 3D MP-RAGE images, the fat-suppression effect improves delineation of intraorbital structures. Enhanced images were more accurate than nonenhanced images for the diagnosis of retrograde venous drainage to the posterior fossa. Enhanced 3D MP-RAGE images were more sensitive than T1-weighted SE images because of the high spatial resolution with no gaps, the reduction of vascular dephasing, the decreased susceptibility artifacts, and the suppression of fat signals (19). Although our study population included only three patients with retrograde venous drainage to the pontomedullary vein, detection of this was possible only on enhanced 3D MP-RAGE images, possibly because their high spatial resolution and decreased phase artifact.
The diagnosis of retrograde venous drainage into deep veins was difficult regardless of the imaging technique used. Although all images were highly specific, detection was possible in only half of our patients, even on enhanced 3D MP-RAGE images. This result suggested a visualization overlap on MR images between normal veins and veins with retrograde drainage. Many veins and sinuses, such as the sphenoparietal sinus entering into the deep venous systems, and their direction and volume of flow are complex, even in healthy individuals.
On retrospective study, abnormal findings in the inferior petrosal sinuses were observed in four patients. Assessment of the petrosal sinus is important in patients with intracranial dAVFs. In those with carotid-cavernous dural fistula, thrombosis or occlusion of the posterior drainage leads to increased anterior drainage, which results in worsening of exophthalmus and/or chemosis. Furthermore, in patients with dAVFs, interventional curative procedures involve embolization of the affected sinuses and draining routes (23, 24), and the inferior petrosal sinus is one of the most frequent routes used for the transvenous approach. Therefore, enhanced 3D MP-RAGE images may be useful for evaluating veins and sinuses before interventional procedures.
Our study had some limitations. First, most of the lesions were dAVFs at the CS; therefore, our results might not be applicable to fistulas in other sites. In our three patients with fistulas in other sites, however, retrograde venous drainage was well delineated on enhanced MP-RAGE images. Because retrograde venous drainage of dAVFs are similarly seen regardless of the location of the fistula location, we believe that our results are applicable to dAVFs at any location. Evaluation of dAVFs at locations other than the carotid cavernous region is also desirable. Second, we included only patients with known retrograde venous drainage, as confirmed on conventional angiography. Therefore, the incidence of false-positive findings was not fully established. A large sample of dAVFs with or without retrograde venous drainages should be evaluated to establish the actual rates of sensitivity and specificity. Third, enhanced MP-RAGE images cannot provide hemodynamic information equivalent to that obtained with intra-arterial conventional angiography. Although advances have made demonstration of cerebral hemodynamics on MR imaging equivalent to that of intra-arterial conventional angiography (25, 26), we suggest that enhanced high-resolution images, particularly 3D MP-RAGE images, are best for evaluating the retrograde venous drainage in patients with intracranial dAVFs.
Conclusion
Contrast-enhanced MR images are superior to nonenhanced images for assessing retrograde venous drainage in patients with intracranial dAVFs. Enhanced 3D MP-RAGE imaging, which provides high spatial resolution and contiguous depiction of the venous system, may be better than enhanced T1-weighted SE imaging for understanding the routes and severity of retrograde venous drainage. In addition, to evaluate sinus patency, the enhanced 3D MP-RAGE sequence was more appropriate than others.
References
- 1.Vinuela F, Fox AJ, Pelz DM, Drake CG. Unusual clinical manifestations of dural arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986;64:554–558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cognard C, Gobin YP, Pierot L, et al. Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical and angiographic correlation with a revised classification of venous drainage. Radiology 1995;194:671–680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Obrador S, Soto M, Silvela J. Clinical syndromes of arteriovenous malformations of the transvers-sigmoid sinus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1975;38:436–451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Borden JA, Wu KW, Shucart WA. A proposed classification for spinal and cranial dural arteriovenous fistulous malformations and implications for treatment. J Neurosurg 1995;82:166–179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lasjaunias P, Chiu M, terBrugge K, et al. Neurological manifestations of intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986;64:724–730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cognard C, Casasco A, Toevi M, et al. Dural arteriovenous fistulas as a cause of intracranial hypertension due to impairment of cranial venous outflow. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;65:308–316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Davies M, terBrugge K, Willinsky RA, et al. The validity of classifications for the clinical presentations of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg 1996;85:830–837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brown R, Wiebers DO, Nichols D. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae: angiographic predictors of intracranial hemorrhage and clinical outcome in nonsurgical patients. J Neurosurg 1994;81:531–538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hurst RW, Bagley LJ, Galetta S, et al. Dementia from dural arteriovenous fistulas: the pathologic findings of venous hypertensive encephalopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1267–1273 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ishii K, Goto K, Ihara K, et al. High-risk dural arteriovenous fistulae of the transverse and sigmoid sinuses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1987;8:1113–1120 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Awad IA, Little JR, Akrawi WP, Ahl J. Intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations: factors predisposing to an aggressive neurological course. J Neurosurg 1990;72:839–850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Barnwell SL, Halbach VV, Dowd CF, et al. A variant of arteriovenous fistulas within the wall of dural sinuses: results of combined surgical and endovascular therapy. J Neurosurg 1991;74:199–204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Willinsky R, Goyal M, terBrugge K, Montanera W. Tortuous, engorged pial veins in intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: correlations with presentation, location, and MR findings in 122 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1031–1036 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hirai T, Korogi Y, Hamatake S, et al. Three-dimensional FISP imaging in the evaluation of carotid cavernous fistula: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT and spin-echo MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:253–259 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liang L, Korogi Y, Takahashi M, et al. Evaluation of the intracranial dural sinuses with a 3D contrast-enhanced MP-RAGE sequence: prospective comparison with 2D-TOF venography and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:481–492 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Brant-Zawadzki M, Gillan GD, Nitz WR. MP RAGE: a three-dimensional, T1-weighted, gradient-echo sequence: initial experience in the brain. Radiology 1992;182:769–775 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fellner F, Holl K, Held P, et al. A T1-weighted rapid three-dimensional gradient-echo technique (MP-RAGE) in preoperative MRI of intracranial tumors. Neuroradiology 1996;38:199–206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Brant-Zawadzki M, Gillan GD, Atkinson DJ, et al. Three-dimensional MR imaging and display of intracranial disease: improvements with the MP-RAGE sequence and gadolinium. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:656–662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Runge VM, Kirsch JE, Thomas GS, Mugler JP. Clinical comparison of three-dimensional MP-RAGE and FLASH techniques for MR imaging of the head. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991;1:493–500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mirowitz SA. Intracranial lesion enhancement with gadolinium: T1-weighted spin-echo versus three-dimensional Fourier transform gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185:529–534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stevenson J, Knopp EA, Litt AW. MP-RAGE subtraction venography: a new technique. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:239–241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chen J, Tsuruda JS, Halbach VV. Suspected dural arteriovenous fistula: results with screening MR angiography in seven patients. Radiology 1992;183:265–271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vinuela F, Fox A, Debrun G, et al. Spontaneous carotid-cavernous fistulas: clinical, radiological, and therapeutic considerations. J Neurosurg 1984;60:976–984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kiyosue H, Hori Y, Okahara M, et al. Treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: current strategies based on location and hemodynamics, and alternative techniques of transcatheter embolization. Radiographics 2004;24:1637–1653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M, et al. Two-dimensional thick-slice MR digital subtraction angiography for assessment of cerebrovascular occlusive diseases. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1858–1864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yoshikawa T, Aoki S, Hori M, et al. Time-resolved two-dimensional thick-slice magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography in assessing brain tumors. Eur Radiol 2000;10:736–744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]