The content is available as a PDF (130.0 KB).
Bibliografía
- 1.Atkins D., Best D., Briss P.A., Eccles M., Falck-Ytter Y., Flottorp S., GRADE Working Group Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:1490. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. History and methods [citado 24 Ago 2005]. Disponible en: www.ctfphc.org
- 3.US Preventive Services Task Force Ratings: Strength of Recommendations and Quality of Evidence. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, Third Edition: Periodic Updates, 2000-2003. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD [citado 24 Ago 2005]. Disponible en: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ 3rduspstf/ratings.htm
- 4.Systems to Rate the Strength of Scientific Evidence. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: number 47. AHRQ Publication No. 02-E015, March 2002. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD [citado 24 Ago 2005]. Disponible en: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/strengthsum. htm
- 5.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). EPC Evidence Reports [citado 24 Mar 2005]. Disponible en: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcindex.htm#methodology
- 6.Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine de Oxford. Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation [citado 24 Mar 2005]. Disponible en: http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp
- 7.Scotish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. A guideline developer’s handbook. Edinburg: SIGN; 2001; Publication n° 50 [citado 24 Mar 2005]. Disponible en: http://www.show.scot.nhs.uk/sign/guidelines/ fulltex/50/index.html
- 8.National Institute for Clinical Excelence (NICE): Guideline Development Methods. Information for National Collaborating Centers and Guideline Developers. London [citado 24 Mar 2005]. Disponible en: http://www.nice.org.uk/
- 9.Ebell M.H., Siwek J., Weiss B.D., Woolf S.H., Susman J.L., Ewigman B. Simplifying the language of evidence to improve patient care: Strength Of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in medical literature. J Fam Pract. 2004;53:111–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Upshur R.E. Are all evidence-based practices alike? Problems in the ranking of evidence. CMAJ. 2003;169:672–673. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schünemann H.J., Best D., Vist G., Oxman A.D., for the GRADE working group Letters, numbers, symbols, and words: how best to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations? CMAJ. 2003;169:677–680. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.The GRADE Working Group Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4:38. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.The GRADE Working Group Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: a pilot study of a new system for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Marzo M., Basora J., Rotaeche R., Mascort J.J. La trayectoria científica de semFYC. ¿Hacia dónde queremos avanzar? Aten Primaria. 2005;35:447–448. doi: 10.1157/13075468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]