Abstract
Background:
Stepwise occurrence of biochemically modified amyloid-β (Aβ) in the brain of subjects with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has been suggested to be of significance for cognitive impairment. Our previous reports have shown that Aβ is observed in 63% of all subjects with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) suggesting that the majority of iNPH subjects with Aβ are indeed also suffering from AD.
Objective:
We assessed the occurrence of biochemically modified Aβ variants, in vivo, in subjects with iNPH and in a cohort of postmortem brain samples from patients with dementia.
Methods:
We assessed Aβ proteins in 127 diagnostic brain biopsies obtained from subjects with iNPH and in a cohort of subjects with dementia by means of immunohistochemistry.
Results:
The pyroglutamylated Aβ (pyAβ) precedes the aggregation of phosphorylated Aβ (pAβ) during the AD neuropathological change progression; moreover, these modified variants of Aβ correlate with hyperphosphorylated tau in the frontal cortical area of human brain. Our results confirm the existence of the suggested biochemical stages of Aβ aggregation that might be of significance for neurodegeneration leading to cognitive impairment.
Conclusion:
The observation that both pyAβ and pAβ are seen in vivo in iNPH subjects is intriguing. It has been reported that most of the iNPH subjects with Aβ in the brain biopsy indeed develop AD with time. Based on our current and previous results, it is clinically merited to obtain a diagnostic biopsy from a subject with iNPH. When Aβ is observed in the biopsy, the biochemical characterization is of interest.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease neuropathologic change, amyloid-β, biochemical variants, idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
INTRODUCTION
Extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) aggregates and intraneuronal accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau (HPτ), i.e., Alzheimer’s disease neuropathological change (ADNC), are the hallmark lesions of AD [1, 2]. During the progression of the disease, the proteins are seen in different brain regions following predisposed neuroanatomical regions, causing a progressive neurodegeneration, leading to cognitive impairment [2–5]. During the last two decades, several groups have been able to detect Aβ and HPτ, by applying immunohistochemical (IHC) methods in stereotactic, cortical, brain biopsies from patients surgically treated for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) [6–10].
iNPH is a neurological disease in elderly, caused by impaired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation, which causes progressive hydrocephalus and presents with gait disturbance, urinary incontinence, and cognitive impairment [11, 12]. Currently, the only treatment strategy implemented in patients with iNPH is a surgical ventriculo-peritoneal shunt (VPS) insertion, which can alleviate the symptoms by normalizing the CSF flow [11, 12]. During the VPS surgery, one tip of the shunt is placed into the frontal horn of the right ventricle and the other in the peritoneal cavity. Both catheters are connected to a shunt valve controlling the CSF pressure [11, 12]. While preparing the shunt channel, some neurosurgeons have taken a diagnostic brain biopsy from the area of the shunt channel, i.e., right frontal lobe [6, 9, 10, 13]. Detection of ADNC by applying IHC method in these samples, from the frontal cortex, suggests at least low to intermediate level of ADNC in the brain, according to international consensus criteria [14, 15]. The presence of ADNC, associated with poor shunt response, has been reported to indicate poorer prognosis and eventual progression to full blown AD [9, 10, 16–18]. When a postmortem (PM) analysis has been carried out on brains obtained from subjects with a clinical diagnosis of iNPH, it has been observed that a substantial number of subjects display varying degrees of ADNC [13, 19, 20]. The early signs of neurodegeneration, especially synaptic loss, seen in AD, were also observed in a cohort of subjects with iNPH [8, 21]. All of the above implies that iNPH seems to be a reliable model of AD.
Aβ, one of the hallmark proteins of AD, is a result of a two-step enzymatic cleavage of the amyloid-β protein precursor, a cell membrane protein, by β- and γ-secretase into an Aβ peptide, which is prone to forming extracellular aggregates within the grey matter of the brain [1, 22]. The Aβ is first seen in the neocortex and thereafter progresses through defined neuroanatomical regions, affecting the brainstem and cerebellum at the end stage [3, 23]. The Aβ aggregates can be detected in brain tissue of young subjects, years before the symptom onset of AD and in subjects that never develop a dementing illness [24–26]. The most commonly used antibodies for detection of Aβ are clones Aβ6F/3D and Aβ4G8. In addition to Aβ neuroanatomical progression, the protein deposits undergo biochemical changes [22, 27–29]. These biochemical changes primarily affect the N-terminal sequence of the protein [22, 29]. The modified, N-terminal truncated Aβ variants are more toxic and more prone to aggregate when compared with the unmodified Aβ. The pyroglutamylation of the N-terminus produces a py Aβ N3pE variant (pyAβ), which is detected in Aβ aggregates of AD, demonstrating increased tendency to aggregate, increased neurotoxicity, and weak solubility. The most studied phosphorylation site in Aβ is at serine residue 8, producing a phosphorylated Aβ 1E4E11 (pAβ) variant. When this neurotoxic pAβ variant is detected in AD, it increases the formation of Aβ oligomers that form the cores of fibrillization [22]. Previous studies have suggested that the biochemical changes in the composition of Aβ deposits, as mentioned above, occur in a hierarchical manner. Initially, at the pre-clinical AD, stage 1, primarily unmodified Aβ variants are seen in the Aβ aggregates. Parallel to the progress of the pathology, stage 2, the pyAβ variants are detected. At the end stage, when cognitive failure is obvious, the pAβ variants are noted [27, 28]. Furthermore, the pyAβ variant seems to be associated with increased extent of HPτ pathology in the human brain [30].
The aim of this study was to assess the presence of different biochemical variants of Aβ and HPτ, not only as previously described in PM brain but also in surgical brain biopsy samples obtained from subjects with iNPH treated with VPS. This approach gives us a unique opportunity to study protein expression at an early stage in vivo. Furthermore, it allows us to avoid tissue alterations associated with agonal state, PM delay and particularly alterations related to issues such as fixation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Ethical statement
Regarding biopsies, the study has been approved by the regional Ethical Committee of Uppsala, Sweden #2013/176, updated 2016. The subjects studied here have given their informed consent for the use of the diagnostic tissue for scientific purposes. The use of PM tissue was approved by the regional Ethical Committee of Uppsala, Sweden, #2011/286, updated 2015.
Study subjects
iNPH subjects
All diagnostic brain biopsies from iNPH patients, obtained during curative VPS insertion at Uppsala University Hospital (UUH), during 2010–2018, were identified in the database, Laboratory Investigation System, of the Surgical Pathology Department at UUH. In total, 448 samples were identified. One of the selection criteria was notable Aβ pathology in the biopsy; based on the data in the files, 142 fulfilled this requirement. The second selection criterion was age, i.e., over 70 years at biopsy, and 130 subjects were within the range of 70 to 88 years when biopsied. All the diagnostic slides of this cohort were retrieved from the archives and reassessed. Two cases displayed only sparse Aβ pathology and were excluded from the cohort. Additionally, one subject was biopsied twice; so, the second biopsy from the same subject was excluded from the cohort. Thus, brain biopsy specimens from 127 subjects fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in the study cohort.
Biopsy samples
The brain tissue specimen was obtained from the right frontal lobe, within the area of the superior- and medial- right frontal gyri, during the surgical VPS insertion, as previously described [6, 7, 11]. The samples were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (4% formaldehyde), at room temperature for 24 h and then processed into paraffin blocks (Histowax from Histolab Products). The blocks were sectioned, into 4-μm thick sections, which were put on the Super Frost slides for Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE) staining and Super Frost Plus slides for IHC stainings.
Reference material
A tissue micro array (TMA) block was constructed, including core samples measuring 2 mm in diameter obtained from the amygdaloid body from 26 PM brains. These brains had undergone a standardized neuropathological examination at UUH during 2011–2013 [31]. Each subject was represented by two cores. At the neuropathological investigation, 20 of the subjects displayed various levels of ADNC pathology, whereas six displayed pure Primary Age Related Tauopathy (PART) and thus excluded. The block was sectioned into 4-μm thick sections, which were put on the Super Frost slides for HE staining and Super Frost Plus slides for IHC stainings. Two core samples, from the same subject, were damaged and thus excluded from the final analysis, i.e., assessable material included cores from 19 subjects.
Immunohistochemistry
The IHC stainings were performed using automatic platform. The antibodies used and the pre-treatments applied are summarized in Table 1. Two of the antibodies, the pAβ1E4E11 and the Aβ7H3D6, a variant that recognize Aβ with unmodified N-terminus (umAβ), were both generated as previously described [32]. For these two antibodies, additional treatments were implemented following systematic testing in order to reach optimal results. The stainings were performed using Dako Autostainer Plus (DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) with the Dako EnVision Flex detection system (DakoCytomation), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Table 1.
Antibody | Clone | Company/code | Dilution | Pre-treatment | Additional strategy |
Aβ aa17–24 | 4G8 | Biolegend/800703 | 1:4000 | FA 5 min | |
Aβ aa8–17 | 6F/3D | Dako-Agilent/M0872 | 1:50 | FA 5 min | |
pyAβ N3pE | polyclonal | Tecan/JP18591 | 1:50 | FA 5 min | |
pAβ S8 PM | 1E4E11 | “In house” [32] | 1:500 | FA 3 min | a |
pAβ S8 PX | 1E4E11 | “In house” [32] | 1:500 | FA 3 min | b |
umAβ | 7H3D6 | “In house” [32] | 1:1000 | FA 5 min | c |
Hyperphosphorylated (Ser202/Thr205) τ (TAU8) | PHF-TAU-AT8 | Fisher Scientific-Invitrogen/MN1020 | 1:1000 |
Aβ, amyloid-β; py, pyroglutamylated; p, phosphorylated; S8, serine residue 8; um, unmodified; PM, post-mortem; PX, biopsy sample; FA, formic acid 100%. aPrimary antibody (Ab) was incubated overnight at 4°C. For detection, a mouse linker was applied for 20 min, followed by Dako Envision Flex Kit. bIncubation with primary Ab 2 x 30 min, followed by mouse linker for 20 min, followed by Dako Envision Flex Kit and 2 x 5 min of 3,3’-Diaminobenzidine/DAB (Horseradish Peroxidase included in Dako Envision Flex Kit). cA rabbit anti-rat Ab (ab6703) was applied for 30 min before applying the Dako Envision Flex Kit.
Assessment of the samples
All samples were assessed using light microscopy (Olympus BX45) at ×20 to ×400 magnification. The stained sections were then scanned into digital slides with Aperio AT2 (Leica Biosystems, Inc) in 20× magnification, into ScanScope virtual slide (svs) format.
The extent of the pathology within each sample was assessed, and the alteration was graded as follows: 0 = no pathology, 1 = low level of pathology, 2 = moderate level of pathology, and 3 = high level of pathology. Low level of HPτ pathology was assigned when a single–a few HPτ reactive granules and threads were detected. In the moderate level of HPτ pathology, scattered granules and threads were seen as well as a few tangles. High level of HPτ pathology was assigned when abundant amounts of neurites and several tangles were seen in the sample (Fig. 1). When assessing the Aβ pathology, low level was assigned when a single–couple aggregates were seen in a tissue sample. Moderate level of pathology was assigned when scattered Aβ aggregates were seen, and high level of pathology when abundant Aβ reactive aggregates were noted (Fig. 1).
This grading system was applied on all iNPH samples and on each core in the reference TMA. When the extent of pathology differed between the two cores obtained from the same case in the TMA, the core with highest extent of pathology was chosen.
Additionally, a subset, 37 cases, of iNPH samples, were morphometrically analyzed using the positive pixel count algorithm (version 9.1) within the Aperio ImageScope software (Leica Biosystems, Inc). All settings were pre-set in the software, except “The Intensity Threshold (Upper Limit) of WEAK positive pixels”, which was increased from 220 to 255. The algorithm was applied on grey matter area in the biopsies, excluding the molecular cell layer and vessels with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. The immunoreactivity (IR), with different intensities, was noted in every sample and subdivided into weak, moderate, and strong. The staining quality and the structures visualized by protein expression determined the approach used to quantify the IR pixels, i.e., the extent of pathology. For the Aβ, the sum of all positive pixels were counted independently of the staining intensity. Only the strong- and moderately- positive pixels were counted in the HPτ staining. The positive pixels within the grey matter were transformed into a stained area in mm2. The ratio between the stained area, per total area in each biopsy ×100, resulted in stained area fraction (SAF), which is a final measure of IR within the tissue.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS statistics software, version 27 (IBM Corp, NY, USA). Means and standard error of means (m±SE) were used to describe the cohort. Non-parametric tests, Mann Whitney U test (MWU), Kruskal Wallis test (KWT), and Wilcoxon signed-rank test (WSRT) were used to assess differences between groups. The correlations between the studied variables were defined using non-parametric Spearman’s rho two tail test.
RESULTS
iNPH subjects
A total of 127 samples from subjects with iNPH were assessed. The age range when the biopsy was taken was 70 to 88 years; moreover, the m±SE of age was 77.46±0.43 years, 64 were females and 63 males. The m±SE of age for females was 76.98±0.61 and 77.95±0.91 for males. No significant age difference was observed between the genders (MWU, p = 0.288). Light microscopic assessment confirmed the presence of grey matter in the biopsies and excluded other processes that could affect the interpretation of the pathology seen as well as confirmed the compartmentalization of the IR assessed with the different IHC markers, i.e., intraneuronal for HPτ and extracellular for Aβ. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy was observed in 11 out of the 127 samples, representing 9% of the total cohort.
All cases included displayed Aβ6F/3D positive aggregates, at moderate to high level in their biopsies. HPτ was seen in 115 samples (91%) of which 72 subjects (57%) displayed low-, 29 (23%) intermediate-, and 14 (11%) high-level of pathology. To test the assessment strategy applied in this study, the SAF was measured for HPτ and Aβ6F/3D in 37 of the iNPH samples.
When assessing HPτ pathology, a significant (p =0.000) correlation (Sperman’s rho = 0.8) was seen between the outcome applying morphometry (SAF values) and semi-quantitative assessments (low/1, moderate/2 and high/3 level). The m±SE of HPτ/SAF in low level was 0.28±0.06 % (range 0.02–0.92); moderate level 0.56±0.11 (range 0.32–1.17) and high level 9.18±1.91 (2.91–18.51).
When assessing the Aβ pathology, a significant (p = 0.041) correlation (Spearman’s rho = 0.3) was seen between the outcome applying morphometry and semi-quantitative assessment. The m±SE of Aβ/SAF in moderate level was 13.81±2.30 (range 7.26–17.00) and in high level, 18.09±0.54 (range 10.00–27.00). The overlap of SAF values in moderate and high level of Aβ is due to the inclusion of the whole biopsy when evaluating the sample by eye contrary to assessing a defined area when applying SAF.
The Aβ4G8 positive lesions were detected in all subjects, where 27 (21%) displayed the intermediate level and 100 (79%) displayed the high level of pathology. The umAβ variant was expressed at low level in 7 (6%) of the samples, at intermediate level in 52 (41%) and at high level in 68 (54%) samples. The pyAβ was detected in all samples, wherein 11 (9%) cases at low level, 42 (33%) at intermediate level and 74 (64%) at high level of pathology. The pAβ was not observed in 3 (2%) of the samples, seen at low level in 76 (60%), intermediate level in 46 (36%) and high level in 2 (2%) cases.
The expression of the different proteins studied here was not affected by gender (MWU). The samples were divided into three age groups, depending on the age of the subject when the sample was taken (Table 2). Group 1 included subjects aged 70 to 74 years, group 2 aged 75 to 79, and group 3 aged 80 to 88 years. The IR of the proteins in relation to age groups is summarized in Table 2. A significant difference related to age was observed for three of the proteins, i.e., Aβ6F/3D, Aβ4G8, and umAβ. In age group 3, the extent of protein expression decreased slightly for all the proteins compared to group 2, but significant decrease was seen only with Aβ4G8 (MWU, p = 0.017). The decrease of protein expression was absent when only male subjects were included. The decrease was significant (MWU p =0.019) for Aβ4G8 and close to significant (MWU, p = 0.051) for Aβ6F/3D in females. When comparing the mean extent of pyAβ with pAβ, the mean value of pyAβ was higher (45%) for the whole cohort. This difference, pyAβ> pAβ, was also significant (p = 0.000, WSRT) in the different age groups.
Table 2.
Age | Age group | Number | Gender | Value | HPτ | Aβ | ||||
F/M | 6F/3D | 4G8 | um7H3D6 | pyN3pE | p1E4E11 | |||||
70–88 | All | 127 | 64/63 | m±SE | 1.35±0.80 | 2.71±0.46 | 2.79±0.41 | 2.48±0.60 | 2.50±0.65 | 1.37±0.56 |
70–74 | 1 | 43 | 23/20 | m±SE | 1.21±0.11 | 2.58±0.08 | 2.67±0.07 | 2.28±0.10 | 2.35±0.11 | 1.30±0.08 |
75–79 | 2 | 45 | 23/22 | m±SE | 1.51±0.13 | 2.84±0.06 | 2.93±0.04 | 2.62±0.08 | 2.60±0.09 | 1.40±0.08 |
80–88 | 3 | 39 | 18/21 | m±SE | 1.33±0.12 | 2.69±0.08 | 2.74±0.07 | 2.54±0.09 | 2.54±0.10 | 1.41±0.10 |
Statistics/KWT | ns | p = 0.025 | p = 0.009 | p = 0.032 | ns | ns |
HPτ, hyperphosphorylated τ; Aβ, amyloid β; F, females; M, males; um, unmodified; py, pyroglutamylated; p, phosphorylated; m±SE, mean±standard error of means; KWT, Kruskal-Wallis Test.
In the total cohort, the extent of all protein altera-tions correlated significantly with each other (Table 3). Within the age groups 2 and 3, where the pathology was pronounced, the HPτ pathology correlated at a significant level with both the pyAβ and pAβ but not with Aβ6F/3D and Aβ4G8. The umAβ correlated with HPτ only in age group 2.
Table 3.
HPτ | Aβ | |||||
6F/3D | 4G8 | um7H3D6 | pyN3pE | |||
Aβ | 6F/3D | 0.330.000 | ||||
4G8 | 0.280.001 | 0.810.000 | ||||
um7H3D6 | 0.320.000 | 0.720.000 | 0.580.000 | |||
pyN3pE | 0.410.000 | 0.690.000 | 0.690.000 | 0.630.000 | ||
p1E4E11 | 0.340.000 | 0.350.000 | 0.260.003 | 0.420.000 | 0.380.000 |
HPτ, hyperphosphorylated τ; Aβ, amyloid β; um, unmodified; py, pyroglutamylated; p, phosphorylated.
Reference material
The TMA included core samples from 19 reference cases, 9 females and 10 males, age range at death 50 to 93 years, m±SE 75.74±11.14. The Aβ4G8 was seen in all cores, the Aβ6F/3D and the pyAβ in 18 (95%), umAβ in 14 (74%), and pAβ in 11 (58%) of the 19 samples. HPτ was seen in all of the samples. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy was observed in 5 (26%) samples.
The reference cases in the TMA were split into three groups, according to the level of ADNC pathology, as recommended by the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association’s guidelines, into low, intermediate, and high grade of ADNC [14, 15]. The expression of proteins studied here in samples from subjects with various levels of ADNC is summarized in Table 4. The expression of all studied proteins increased with increasing level of ADNC, and at a significant level for HPτ, Aβ6F/3D, the umAβ and pAβ variants (KWT). When comparing the mean extent of pyAβ with pAβ, the mean value of pyAβ was 37% higher in the whole TMA cohort as well as in the different levels of ADNC (62%/low level, 50%/intermediate level, 13%/high level). These differences were significant (p = 0.002) in the total cohort of 19 samples.
Table 4.
Level of ADNC | Number | Value | HPτ | Aβ | ||||
6F/3D | 4G8 | um7H3D6 | pyN3pE | p1E4E11 | ||||
All | 19 | m±SE | 2.32±0.89 | 1.89±0.81 | 2.42±0.69 | 1.26±0.99 | 1.84±0.90 | 1.16±1.17 |
Low | 6 | m±SE | 1.33±0.82 | 1,17±0.75 | 2.17±0.98 | 0.67±0.82 | 1.33±1.03 | 0.50±0.84 |
Intermediate | 7 | m±SE | 2.57±0.54 | 2.00±0.58 | 2.43±0.54 | 1.00±0.82 | 1.71±0.76 | 0.86±1.22 |
High | 6 | m±SE | 3.00±0.00 | 2.50±0.55 | 2.67±0.52 | 2.17±0.75 | 2.50±0.55 | 2.17±0.75 |
Statistics/KWT | p = 0.005 | p = 0.015 | ns | p = 0.024 | ns | p = 0.031 |
HPτ, hyperphosphorylated τ; Aβ, amyloid β; um, unmodified; py, pyroglutamylated; p, phosphorylated; m±SE, mean±standard error of means; KWT, Kruskal-Wallis Test.
Within this cohort of 19 samples from amygdala region, HPτ correlates with all Aβ variants except for Aβ4G8. All the Aβ variants correlate with each other except for Aβ4G8, which does not correlate with the umAβ and pAβ variants.
DISCUSSION
In this study, for the first time, we assessed different biochemical Aβ variants and their association with HPτ in a unique cohort of surgical brain biopsies from iNPH subjects undergoing a curative VPS insertion. We chose to include subjects who were 70 years and older with notable Aβ pathology. Our cohort included 127 subjects, all expressing Aβ6F/3D and Aβ4G8 at a moderate to high level in line with our selection criteria. Parallel with Aβ, HPτ was seen in 91% of these brain biopsies; thus, the cases mirror subjects with different stages of ADNC [25, 26]. Noteworthy, the detection of HPτ in 91% of all samples is an outcome that is higher than previously reported by others in the iNPH setting [6, 7, 9, 33]. In this study, the stainings were standardized and automatically performed. We used semi-quantitative grading scheme, and we correlated the outcome of our semi-quantitative grading with morphometric technique. The semi-quantitative grading scheme correlated at significant level with SAF for assessment of both Aβ and HPτ, confirming that our method is reproducible and thus reliable.
Regarding the assessment, all labelling, also small grains or thread were assessed, as visualized in Fig. 1A. The assessment strategy of HPτ pathology has not been described in detail in previous publications, but while reading the descriptions it seems that only tangles and neurites have been taken into account [6, 9, 10, 33]. In a recent publication by us, it was estimated that when all subjects with sparse HPτ/SAF were excluded, i.e., subjects with grains but lacking tangles, the incidence of subjects with HPτ is in line with what has previously been reported [8]. Furthermore, contrary to previous publications only cases with notable Aβ pathology were included, i.e., cases with sparse Aβ expression in the cortex were excluded [6, 25, 26]. Moreover, in our cohort, the age ranged from 70 to 88 years, whereas other studies have included subjects from the age of 28 to 87 years. The influence of age on the progression of ADNC is well established [6, 25, 26].
All variants of Aβ studied here increased with age, a finding in line with the known progressive nature of the Aβ process [24, 25, 27, 28, 32]. Different biochemical modifications of Aβ protein have been described, where these modifications have been associated with increased aggregation and neurotoxicity [22, 29]. Both pyAβ and pAβ variants have been detected in Aβ aggregates in mouse models and brain tissue from subjects with pre-clinical AD, AD, and Down syndrome [27, 28, 34]. Previously, it has been reported that aggregation of different biochemical variants of Aβ occurs in a certain hierarchical manner. The pyAβ and pAβ variants are not detected at the early biochemical stage 1. In stage 2, the pyAβ is additionally identified within the aggregates; in the final stage 3, the pAβ variant is detected. The pAβ variant is seen mainly in subjects with symptomatic AD disease [27, 28]. In our cohort, the pyAβ was detected in all samples, while the pAβ was seen in 98%. The high expression of both these modified Aβ variants in our cohort is interesting as it indicates strongly that our cases with notable Aβ aggregation have already surpassed the early stage of pathology, i.e., Thal phase 1 [3]. Thus, this outcome is also in line with our observation that HPτ pathology is seen in 91% of the subjects, suggesting that the stage of the neuronal degeneration, i.e., HPτ pathology is closer to Braak stages III–IV than Braak stage I–II [4]. It should be noted that we were not able to grade our cohort biochemically regarding Aβ, as has been done previously when studying PM brain with AD [27, 28]. Here based on the selection criteria, we excluded cases with low level of Aβ pathology. Interestingly, the pyAβ expression was significantly higher in all age groups when compared with the pAβ variant (Table 2). This outcome is in line with previous reports based on PM studies on AD subjects, suggesting that pyAβ precedes the aggregation of pAβ [27, 28].
We observed an association between HPτ pathology and the modified Aβ variants, pyAβ and pAβ, in our study cohort, particularly regarding groups 2 and 3, where the pathology was more prominent. This is in line with previous reports finding that pyAβ is associated with HPτ pathology, particularly in frontal cortical areas. When detected in the frontal cortex, the pyAβ variant has been reported as being a significant predilection marker of AD [30].
We have not assessed the association of the pathology assessed here with the cognitive status of the subjects in our cohort. Previous studies of iNPH subjects have shown that a substantial number of subjects with ADNC in their brain biopsies exhibit cognitive decline at the time of the biopsy and progress into AD during follow-up [7, 17, 18, 36]. Moreover, subjects with cognitive symptoms, but without ADNC in a biopsy, do display ADNC when re-biopsied later [9]. Thus, the presence of ADNC and the pAβ variant in particular, in the brain biopsies of iNPH subjects, certainly suggests that dementia illness associated with ADNC is progressing.
The umAβ7H3D6 is an antibody directed toward the non-phosphorylated Aβ variant at Serine residue 8 and is described to be highly specific for Aβ variants without any N-terminal modifications, i.e., pyroglutamylation, phosphorylation or nitration [32]. This umAβ variant increases with age and is correlated with all Aβ variants and HPτ within our cohort, as seen in Tables 2 and 3. The umAβ variant, together with pyAβ and pAβ, in the Aβ aggregates, indicates a complex biochemical process during the plaque/aggregate formation in the setting of iNPH, as previously described for AD [22, 27–29, 34]. In iNPH, the presence of ADNC, particularly Aβ, is the strongest predictive factor for the development of AD; consequently, the composition of the Aβ aggregates seen in iNPH subjects is indeed of great interest [18]. Different post-translational changes of Aβ protein alter the biochemical properties of the protein, leading to Aβ variants promoting aggregation, reducing solubility and increasing neurotoxicity. All factors listed above are of significance when designing new treatment strategies [22, 29]. Our results suggest that iNPH patients with varying degrees of ADNC alterations in their brain biopsies would certainly benefit from early contact with memory clinics and eventual intervention with neuroprotective and anti-amyloid pharmaceutical treatments.
Interestingly, the expression of all proteins ass-essed here increased generally with age, independent of gender. Surprisingly, however, a slight decrease, in the expression of all assessed proteins was observed between age groups 2 and 3, as illustrated in Table 2. This decrease was, however, only observed in females and was significant for Aβ4G8 and close to significant for Aβ6F/3D. The number of subjects was relatively high in both age and gender groups, thus suggesting that this outcome is reliable. Whether the gender related outcome is related to the characteristics of proteins assessed or other secondary alterations seen in the brain of subjects with ADNC such as astrogliosis, inflammation, vascular lesions or medication need to be studied further [31, 37–40].
All the proteins studied in our iNPH cohort have also been studied in a reference TMA with PM brain samples from the amygdala of subjects with various levels of ADNC. In line with previous reports in our PM cohort, an increase of pyAβ and pAβ was observed, parallel with the increase in the level of ADNC; moreover, extent of pyAβ was higher than pAβ at all levels of ADNC (Table 4). These observations are in line with previous reports, where the pyAβ and pAβ were detected in hierarchical manner [27, 28, 34]. Thus, our results from the reference TMA are in line with our observations in the iNPH cohort and confirm previous observations seen in mouse models and human brain tissue from subjects with pre-clinical AD, AD, and Down syndrome [27, 28, 34].
In conclusion, for the first time, we were able to demonstrate modified Aβ variants in brain biopsies from iNPH subjects. Our results indicate that in iNPH, the pyAβ precedes the aggregation of pAβ during the ADNC progression and that the modified variants of Aβ correlate with the HPτ in the frontal cortical areas of human brain. These results are congruent with what has been reported for AD [27, 28, 30, 34]. The modified Aβ variants have been reported as being associated with cognitive decline [27, 28]. Our results, and the previously reported association between modified Aβ and cognitive impairment, strongly suggest that iNPH subjects with notable ADNC and cognitive impairment are subjects suffering from AD. Whether the clinical malady caused by ADNC is further altered by pathological lesions in the white matter, related to iNPH, is unclear and should be studied further. Thus, iNPH patients with ADNC in their brain biopsies certainly benefit from contact with memory clinics and treatments that are available modifying ADNC pathology.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank all the subjects included in this study, and Professor Dietmar R Thal for constructive suggestions regarding the use of antibodies and for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Meena Strömqvist for her critical reading of the manuscript. The sources of financial support include local grants (ALF) from Uppsala University Hospital and grants from Hans Gabriel and Alice Trolle-Wachtmeister foundation in Sweden.
Authors’ disclosures available online (https://www.j-alz.com/manuscript-disclosures/20-1469r1).
REFERENCES
- [1]. Storey E, Cappai R (1999) The amyloid precursor protein of Alzheimer’s disease and the Abeta peptide. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 25, 81–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2]. Braak H, Braak E (1991) Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol 82, 239–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3]. Thal DR, Rub U, Orantes M, Braak H (2002) Phases of A beta-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD. Neurology 58, 1791–1800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4]. Braak H, Alafuzoff I, Arzberger T, Kretzschmar H, Del Tredici K (2006) Staging of Alzheimer disease-associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry. Acta Neuropathol 112, 389–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5]. Boyle PA, Yu L, Wilson RS, Schneider JA, Bennett DA (2013) Relation of neuropathology with cognitive decline among older persons without dementia. Front Aging Neurosci 5, 50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6]. Leinonen V, Koivisto AM, Savolainen S, Rummukainen J, Tamminen JN, Tillgren T, Vainikka S, Pyykko OT, Molsa J, Fraunberg M, Pirttila T, Jaaskelainen JE, Soininen H, Rinne J, Alafuzoff I (2010) Amyloid and tau proteins in cortical brain biopsy and Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol 68, 446–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7]. Elobeid A, Laurell K, Cesarini KG, Alafuzoff I (2015) Correlations between mini-mental state examination score, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, and pathology observed in brain biopsies of patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 74, 470–479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8]. Libard S, Alafuzoff I (2019) Alzheimer’s disease neuropathological change and loss of matrix/neuropil in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, a model of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun 7, 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9]. Pomeraniec IJ, Bond AE, Lopes MB, Jane JA Sr. (2016) Concurrent Alzheimer’s pathology in patients with clinical normal pressure hydrocephalus: Correlation of high-volume lumbar puncture results, cortical brain biopsies, and outcomes. J Neurosurg 124, 382–388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10]. Bech-Azeddine R, Hogh P, Juhler M, Gjerris F, Waldemar G (2007) Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: Clinical comorbidity correlated with cerebral biopsy findings and outcome of cerebrospinal fluid shunting. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78, 157–161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11]. Williams MA, Malm J (2016) Diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 22, 579–599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12]. Ghosh S, Lippa C (2014) Diagnosis and prognosis in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 29, 583–589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13]. Libard S, Laurell K, Cesarini KG, Alafuzoff I (2018) Progression of Alzheimer’s disease-related pathology and cell counts in a patient with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Alzheimers Dis 61, 1451–1462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14]. Hyman BT, Phelps CH, Beach TG, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Carrillo MC, Dickson DW, Duyckaerts C, Frosch MP, Masliah E, Mirra SS, Nelson PT, Schneider JA, Thal DR, Thies B, Trojanowski JQ, Vinters HV, Montine TJ (2012) National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 8, 1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15]. Montine TJ, Phelps CH, Beach TG, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Dickson DW, Duyckaerts C, Frosch MP, Masliah E, Mirra SS, Nelson PT, Schneider JA, Thal DR, Trojanowski JQ, Vinters HV, Hyman BT (2012) National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease: A practical approach. Acta Neuropathol 123, 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16]. Abu Hamdeh S, Virhammar J, Sehlin D, Alafuzoff I, Cesarini KG, Marklund N (2018) Brain tissue Abeta42 levels are linked to shunt response in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 130, 121–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17]. Koivisto AM, Kurki MI, Alafuzoff I, Sutela A, Rummukainen J, Savolainen S, Vanninen R, Jaaskelainen JE, Soininen H, Leinonen V (2016) High risk of dementia in ventricular enlargement with normal pressure hydrocephalus related symptoms. J Alzheimers Dis 52, 497–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18]. Luikku AJ, Hall A, Nerg O, Koivisto AM, Hiltunen M, Helisalmi S, Herukka SK, Junkkari A, Sutela A, Kojoukhova M, Korhonen V, Mattila J, Lotjonen J, Rummukainen J, Alafuzoff I, Jaaskelainen JE, Remes AM, Solomon A, Kivipelto M, Soininen H, Rauramaa T, Leinonen V (2019) Predicting development of Alzheimer’s disease in patients with shunted idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Alzheimers Dis 71, 1233–1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19]. Cabral D, Beach TG, Vedders L, Sue LI, Jacobson S, Myers K, Sabbagh MN (2011) Frequency of Alzheimer’s disease pathology at autopsy in patients with clinical normal pressure hydrocephalus. Alzheimers Dement 7, 509–513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20]. Leinonen V, Koivisto AM, Savolainen S, Rummukainen J, Sutela A, Vanninen R, Jaaskelainen JE, Soininen H, Alafuzoff I (2012) Post-mortem findings in 10 patients with presumed normal-pressure hydrocephalus and review of the literature. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 38, 72–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21]. Spires-Jones TL, Hyman BT (2014) The intersection of amyloid beta and tau at synapses in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 82, 756–771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22]. Kummer MP, Heneka MT (2014) Truncated and modified amyloid-beta species. Alzheimers Res Ther 6, 28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23]. Alafuzoff I, Thal DR, Arzberger T, Bogdanovic N, Al-Sarraj S, Bodi I, Boluda S, Bugiani O, Duyckaerts C, Gelpi E, Gentleman S, Giaccone G, Graeber M, Hortobagyi T, Hoftberger R, Ince P, Ironside JW, Kavantzas N, King A, Korkolopoulou P, Kovacs GG, Meyronet D, Monoranu C, Nilsson T, Parchi P, Patsouris E, Pikkarainen M, Revesz T, Rozemuller A, Seilhean D, Schulz-Schaeffer W, Streichenberger N, Wharton SB, Kretzschmar H (2009) Assessment of beta-amyloid deposits in human brain: A study of the BrainNet Europe Consortium. Acta Neuropathol 117, 309–320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24]. Braak H, Del Tredici K (2011) The pathological process underlying Alzheimer’s disease in individuals under thirty. Acta Neuropathol 121, 171–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25]. Braak H, Thal DR, Ghebremedhin E, Del Tredici K (2011) Stages of the pathologic process in Alzheimer disease: Age categories from 1 to 100 years. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 70, 960–969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26]. Elobeid A, Libard S, Leino M, Popova SN, Alafuzoff I (2016) Altered proteins in the aging brain. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 75, 316–325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27]. Rijal Upadhaya A, Kosterin I, Kumar S, von Arnim CA, Yamaguchi H, Fandrich M, Walter J, Thal DR (2014) Biochemical stages of amyloid-beta peptide aggregation and accumulation in the human brain and their association with symptomatic and pathologically preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 137, 887–903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28]. Gerth J, Kumar S, Rijal Upadhaya A, Ghebremedhin E, von Arnim CAF, Thal DR, Walter J (2018) Modified amyloid variants in pathological subgroups of beta-amyloidosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 5, 815–831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29]. Dunys J, Valverde A, Checler F (2018) Are N- and C-terminally truncated Abeta species key pathological triggers in Alzheimer’s disease? J Biol Chem 293, 15419–15428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30]. Mandler M, Walker L, Santic R, Hanson P, Upadhaya AR, Colloby SJ, Morris CM, Thal DR, Thomas AJ, Schneeberger A, Attems J (2014) Pyroglutamylated amyloid-beta is associated with hyperphosphorylated tau and severity of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol 128, 67–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31]. Alafuzoff I, Libard S (2020) Mixed brain pathology is the most common cause of cognitive impairment in the elderly. J Alzheimers Dis 78, 453–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32]. Kumar S, Wirths O, Theil S, Gerth J, Bayer TA, Walter J (2013) Early intraneuronal accumulation and increased aggregation of phosphorylated Abeta in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol 125, 699–709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33]. Leinonen V, Koivisto AM, Alafuzoff I, Pyykko OT, Rummukainen J, von Und Zu Fraunberg M, Jaaskelainen JE, Soininen H, Rinne J, Savolainen S (2012) Cortical brain biopsy in long-term prognostication of 468 patients with possible normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurodegener Dis 10, 166–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34]. Kumar S, Lemere CA, Walter J (2020) Phosphorylated Abeta peptides in human Down syndrome brain and different Alzheimer’s-like mouse models. Acta Neuropathol Commun 8, 118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35]. Thal DR, Ghebremedhin E, Rub U, Yamaguchi H, Del Tredici K, Braak H (2002) Two types of sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 61, 282–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36]. Koivisto AM, Alafuzoff I, Savolainen S, Sutela A, Rummukainen J, Kurki M, Jaaskelainen JE, Soininen H, Rinne J, Leinonen V (2013) Poor cognitive outcome in shunt-responsive idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 72, 1–8; discussion 8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37]. Overmyer M, Helisalmi S, Soininen H, Laakso M, Riekkinen P Sr., Alafuzoff I (1999) Reactive microglia in aging and dementia: An immunohistochemical study of postmortem human brain tissue. Acta Neuropathol 97, 383–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38]. Alafuzoff I, Overmyer M, Helisalmi S, Soininen H (2000) Lower counts of astroglia and activated microglia in patients with Alzheimer’s disease with regular use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Alzheimers Dis 2, 37–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39]. Overmyer M, Helisalmi S, Soininen H, Laakso M, Riekkinen P Sr., Alafuzoff I (1999) Astrogliosis and the ApoE genotype. An immunohistochemical study of postmortem human brain tissue. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 10, 252–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40]. Sollvander S, Nikitidou E, Brolin R, Soderberg L, Sehlin D, Lannfelt L, Erlandsson A (2016) Accumulation of amyloid-beta by astrocytes result in enlarged endosomes and microvesicle-induced apoptosis of neurons. Mol Neurodegener 11, 38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]