Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 May 26;16(5):e0248197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248197

The nanoscale organization of the Wnt signaling integrator Dishevelled in the vegetal cortex domain of an egg and early embryo

John H Henson 1,2,*, Bakary Samasa 1,2, Charles B Shuster 2,3, Athula H Wikramanayake 4
Editor: Michael Klymkowsky5
PMCID: PMC8153439  PMID: 34038442

Abstract

Canonical Wnt/β-catenin (cWnt) signaling is a crucial regulator of development and Dishevelled (Dsh/Dvl) functions as an integral part of this pathway by linking Wnt binding to the Frizzled:LRP5/6 receptor complex with β-catenin-stimulated gene expression. In many cell types Dsh has been localized to ill-defined cytoplasmic puncta, however in sea urchin eggs and embryos confocal fluorescence microscopy has shown that Dsh is localized to puncta present in a novel and development-essential vegetal cortex domain (VCD). In the present study, we used super-resolution light microscopy and platinum replica transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to provide the first views of the ultrastructural organization of Dsh within the sea urchin VCD. 3D structured illumination microscopy (SIM) imaging of isolated egg cortices demonstrated the graded distribution of Dsh in the VCD, whereas higher resolution stimulated emission depletion (STED) imaging revealed that some individual Dsh puncta consisted of more than one fluorescent source. Platinum replica immuno-TEM localization showed that Dsh puncta on the cytoplasmic face of the plasma membrane consisted of aggregates of pedestal-like structures each individually labeled with the C-terminus specific Dsh antibody. These aggregates were resistant to detergent extraction and treatment with drugs that disrupt actin filaments or inhibit myosin II contraction, and coexisted with the first cleavage actomyosin contractile ring. These results confirm and extend previous studies and reveal, for the first time in any cell type, the nanoscale organization of plasma membrane tethered Dsh. Our current working hypothesis is that these Dsh pedestals represent a prepositioned scaffold organization that is important for the localized activation of the cWnt pathway at the sea urchin vegetal pole. These observations in sea urchins may also be relevant to the submembranous Dsh puncta present in other eggs and embryos.

Introduction

Wnt signaling controls a broad range of fundamental processes in cell and developmental biology including embryonic axis specification, and cell, tissue and organ morphogenesis and homeostasis [1]. Dishevelled (Dsh/Dvl) is a central integrator of the three main Wnt signaling pathways—the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway which drives cell fate specification, and the non-canonical Wnt/planar cell polarity and Wnt/Ca2+ pathways controlling cellular morphogenesis [24]. Despite decades of research and clear evidence of the essential nature of Dsh in Wnt signal transduction in a number of species, fundamental questions remain about how Dsh is activated, regulated, and localized in cells [2, 5].

The sea urchin embryo has proved to be an exceptional experimental model for studying gene regulatory networks in general and how the canonical Wnt/β-catenin (cWnt) pathway regulates animal-vegetal axis determination in particular [68]. In the cWnt branch of this pathway Wnt ligand binding to the LRP5/6 and Frizzled (Fz) receptor complex activates Dsh which then inhibits the destruction complex comprised of Axin/APC/GSK-3β/CK1 α that targets β-catenin for proteasome-mediated degradation. The stabilization of β-catenin allows for it to accumulate first in the cytoplasm and then translocate into the nucleus where it acts as a transcription coactivator for a number of developmentally significant genes. In the sea urchin, localized activation of cWnt signaling with its associated β-catenin nuclearization in the vegetal blastomeres is a crucial determinant of endomesodermal specification and the patterning of the animal-vegetal axis [913]. The critical role for cWnt signaling in the early specification of the vegetal pole suggests that this region of the early sea urchin embryo may be enriched in Wnt ligands or receptors [14]. However, mRNA localization indicates that none of the maternally expressed Wnts or Fz receptors are preferentially concentrated in the vegetal pole region of the embryo [12, 13, 15, 16]. In addition, it has been argued that β-catenin nuclearization in the vegetal blastomeres is a cell autonomous process not under the influence of extracellular Wnt ligands given that nuclear localization of β-catenin occurs in putative vegetal blastomeres of dissociated embryos [10].

Interestingly, Dsh in sea urchin embryos has been shown to not only play it’s expected role in the cWnt pathway regulation of the β-catenin-dependent gene expression of vegetal cells [12, 17], but also to localize in discrete puncta in a novel vegetal cortical domain (VCD) that arises in oocytes and persists in eggs and embryos [12, 14, 17, 18]. The VCD was initially recognized in early embryos overexpressing Dsh:GFP [17, 18] and subsequently shown to exist in oocytes, eggs and embryos up to the 60-cell stage using immunofluorescent localization [14]. Even though Dsh is maternally expressed uniformly in the egg and early embryo [16, 17], current evidence indicates that the VCD region is critical for its activation and the triggering of the cWnt pathway in the vegetal cells of the embryo. For example, overexpression of Dsh in zygotes had no impact on embryonic development whereas physical dissection of the VCD prior to fertilization resulted in abnormal, animalized/anteriorized embryos [12], an outcome also seen in embryos overexpressing dominant negative Dsh [17]. In addition, transplantation of the VCD to the animal pole induced the generation of ectopic endoderm [12]. All these results suggest that Dsh alone is not sufficient to direct proper cWnt-based development, but that instead it needs to be associated with the VCD which may act as a scaffold for localized Dsh and subsequent cWnt pathway activation [14].

Despite the developmental importance of the VCD, relatively little is known about the precise structural organization of the Dsh localized there. Past studies have shown that Dsh is arranged in cortex associated puncta and mutational analysis suggests that Dsh VCD binding is based on a N-terminal lipid-binding motif, the DIX domain, and a 21 amino acid motif between the Dsh PDZ and DEP domains [17, 18]. Previous work also suggests that while Dsh puncta are not sensitive to disruption of actin filaments or microtubules in the short term, longer term cytochalasin-based actin disruption led to the unexpected degradation of Dsh pools in the egg [14]. Poorly-defined punctate staining patterns, indications of membrane vesicle binding, and/or associations with the cytoskeleton have been reported for Dsh in cells from a broad range of different species [2]. However, Dsh localization in cells remains controversial given that the punctate staining patterns have been considered non-physiological due to potential artifacts associated with biomolecular condensates formed due to Dsh over-expression [19], and other studies have suggested that Dsh can activate the cWnt pathway in the absence of cytoplasmic puncta [20].

In the present study we have localized sea urchin Dsh in the VCD at the ultrastructural level using super-resolution immunofluorescence microscopy and immuno-gold TEM in order to reveal the nanoscale architecture of plasma membrane tethered Dsh and investigate its potential relationship with cortical membrane structures and the actomyosin cytoskeleton. Our results indicate that Dsh in the sea urchin egg VCD is organized into well-defined puncta that consist of aggregates of multiple Dsh proteins that appear as groupings of pedestal-like structures interspersed between the microvillar cores of actin filaments in the cortex. These Dsh patches appear associated with the membrane but are not sensitive to detergent extraction suggesting an association with membrane proteins. We do not see evidence of a direct interaction between Dsh and cortical actin filaments given an analysis of our images and the persistence of Dsh puncta in eggs in which actin filaments have been disrupted with latrunculin treatment. These results confirm and extend previous studies and reveal, for the first time in any cell type, the ultrastructural organization of plasma membrane-tethered Dsh.

Materials and methods

Animals, antibodies, and reagents

Lytechinus pictus sea urchins were purchased from Marinus Scientific (Lakewood, CA) and Strongylocentrotus purpuratus sea urchins were collected from the waters surrounding Port Townsend, WA, and maintained at the Friday Harbor Laboratories (Friday Harbor, WA). All animals were kept in either running natural sea water or closed artificial sea water systems at 10–15°C.

Primary antibodies used included anti-SUDsh-C, an affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against a synthetic peptide (NH2-CMVPMMPRQLGSVPEDLSGS-COOH) based on a phylogenetically conserved sequence from the sea urchin Dsh protein C terminus, a mouse monoclonal antibody against a highly conserved epitope of chicken gizzard actin (clone C4) from EMD Millipore (Burlington, MA), and a mouse monoclonal antibody against the Ser19 phosphorylated form of the myosin II regulatory light chain (P-MyoRLC) from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA). Appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488, 568, or Oregon Green as well as Alexa Fluor 633 conjugated phalloidin were obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Secondary antibody conjugated to 18 nm colloidal gold was obtained from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA). The actin filament disruptor Latrunculin A (100 μg/ml stock in ethanol) and the myosin II light chain kinase (MLCK) inhibitor ML-7 (100 mM stock in DMSO) were obtained from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI), whereas the fixable fluorescent membrane dye FM1-43FX (2 mM stock in methanol) was from Molecular Probes. Unless otherwise indicated, the majority of other reagents were purchased from either Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) or Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA).

Gamete collection, fertilization, cortex isolation, and inhibitor treatments

Sea urchin gametes were collected via intracoelomic injection with 0.5 M KCl, with sperm collected dry and eggs spawned in either natural sea water or MBL artificial sea water (ASW: 423 mM NaCl, 9 mM KCl, 9.27 mM CaCl2, 22.94 mM MgCl2, 25.5 mM MgSO4, 2.14 mM NaHCO3, pH 8.0) and subsequently dejellied by multiple washes with ASW. Eggs were fertilized by addition of dilute sperm, the fertilization envelopes removed using 1 M urea (pH 8.0), and then washed into and reared in MBL calcium free sea water (CFSW: MBL ASW minus CaCl2 and plus 1 mM EGTA) at 10–15°C.

Cortices of unfertilized eggs and first division cycle embryos were generated as described in [21]. In brief, eggs/embryos were allowed to quickly settle onto poly-L-lysine (2 mg/ml) coated coverslips and then exposed to fluid shear force from a pipette containing an isotonic cortex isolation buffer (CIB: 0.8 M mannitol, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM EGTA, 100 mM HEPES, pH 6.8 for unfertilized eggs and pH 7.4 for embryos). Isolated cortices were rinsed twice in CIB prior to further processing for light microscopic fluorescence localization.

In order to test the impact of detergent extraction on Dsh localization, isolated cortices were treated with 1% Triton X-100 in CIB for one minute following isolation and immediately prior to fixation. For disruption of actin filaments, eggs in ASW were treated for 20 min with 1 μM Latrunculin A. The effect of the inhibition of myosin II light chain kinase (MLCK) was tested by treating eggs in ASW for 20 min with 50 μM of the MLCK inhibitor ML-7.

Fixation, fluorescent staining and light microscopic imaging and analysis

Isolated cortices plus and minus Triton extraction were fluorescently stained for membranes using 1–2 μM FM1-43 [22] for two minutes prior to fixation. Cortices were fixed in 2–4% formaldehyde in CIB for 15 min followed by blocking in 2% goat serum and 1% BSA in PBS for 30 minutes. Immunostaining was performed with appropriate primary and secondary antibodies diluted in the range of 1:200 to 1:300 in blocking buffer and staining took place for 30–60 min for each stage. Fluorescent phalloidin was added to the secondary antibody staining step. Cortex samples for conventional and 3D-SIM microscopy were mounted in nonhardening Vectashield antifade mounting media (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), whereas STED imaging samples were mounted in Prolong Diamond mounting media (Molecular Probes).

Widefield epifluorescence microscopy of samples was performed on a Nikon (Tokyo, Japan) 80i microscope using either a 40X/0.75 NA Plan Fluor (phase contrast or DIC) or 60X/1.4 NA Plan Apo phase contrast objective lens with digital images captured using a Photometrics (Tuscon, AZ) CoolSnap Cf cooled CCD camera. Super-resolution microscopy was performed using two different methods. For 3D structured illumination microscopy (3D-SIM) [23], we utilized a DeltaVision OMX 3D-SIM Imaging System (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA) with an Olympus 60X/1.42 NA objective lens. Captured images were deconvolved and reconstructed using SoftWoRx software. Stimulated emission depletion (STED) super-resolution microscopy [24] was performed on a Leica (Wetzlar, Germany) Sp8 STED confocal using a 100X/1.4 NA objective lens.

All types of microscopic images were processed and analyzed using Fiji/ImageJ (Bethesda, MD). Graphs were prepared and statistical analysis carried out using GraphPad Prism 8 (San Diego, CA) with box and whisker plots having the following features: the box extends from the 25th to 75th percentiles; the whiskers extend to the minimum and maximum values; individual data points are plotted as red circles; the line in the middle of the box is the median. Final figures were generated using Adobe Photoshop (San Jose, CA).

Immuno-EM localization and platinum replica TEM

Immuno-EM localization of Dsh followed the methods of Svitkina [25, 26]. Isolated egg cortices were fixed with 0.25% glutaraldehyde in CIB for 5 min, rinsed with PBS and then quenched for 10 min in 2 mg/ml NaBH4 in PBS. Following blocking in 2% goat serum, 1% BSA, and 1 mg/ml glycine in PBS for 30 min, cortices were incubated in primary anti-SUDsh-C antibody for 60 min followed by overnight incubation in colloidal gold-conjugated secondary antibody in immuno-gold buffer (0.5 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.05% Tween 20, 0.1% BSA). Following rinses in immuno-gold buffer, cortices were post fixed with 2% EM-grade glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, pH 7.3 for 30 min.

The generation of critical point-dried and rotary-shadowed platinum replicas of immunolabled isolated cortices followed previously described methods [2527]. Briefly, post fixation cortices were treated with aqueous 0.1% tannic acid followed by aqueous 0.2% uranyl acetate. Then the samples were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, critical point dried, and rotary shadowed with platinum and carbon. The platinum replicas of cortices were separated from the glass coverslips using hydrofluoric acid, mounted on Formvar-coated grids, and observed on a JEM 1011 TEM (JEOL, Peabody, MA) operated at 100 kV and digital images captured with an ORIUS 832.10W CCD camera (Gatan Inc, Warrendale, PA) and presented in inverted contrast. All EM reagents and materials were obtained from Electron Microscopy Sciences (Hatfield, PA).

Results and discussion

The Dsh array in the VCD as visualized with super-resolution microscopy of isolated egg cortices

Super-resolution imaging using 3D-SIM showed that the Dsh localization pattern in the VCD of isolated egg cortices appeared similar to a dot diagram of a concentration gradient (Fig 1A–1H), as was previously documented using confocal imaging [14]. In the center of the VCD the density of Dsh puncta was high and then diminished when moving toward the edge of the distribution (Fig 1I). Measurements of the Dsh density per square micron (n = 15 cortices over 3 separate experiments) varied from an average of 3.6 in the center, to 1.8 midway in the distribution, to 0.7 in the sparse region of the edge (Fig 1I and 1J), with the differences in density between these three regions being statistically significant (p<0.001 based on a one-way ANOVA). 3D-SIM imaging (Fig 1A–1H) suggested that the Dsh puncta were discrete structures. However, imaging with higher resolution STED microscopy revealed that some of the Dsh puncta seen as individual fluorescent dots in confocal imaging (Fig 1M, arrows) were resolved as being composed of multiple spots in the STED images (Fig 1L, arrows). This indicated that the Dsh puncta consisted of aggregates of multiple Dsh proteins. The resolving power of STED is generally considered to be two-fold higher than SIM which is itself two-fold higher than conventional confocal imaging [28].

Fig 1. Super-resolution imaging of Dsh and actin staining in the VCD in cortices isolated from unfertilized eggs.

Fig 1

(A-H) 3D-SIM imaging of Dsh (magenta) and F-actin (green) staining of cortices isolated from L. pictus (A-D) and S. purpuratus (E-H) eggs showing the distribution of Dsh puncta relative to microvillar core actin foci. D and H are higher magnification versions of the 10x10 μm white boxes in C and G, and elongate submembranous actin filaments are visible in D (arrow). (I-M) The distribution of Dsh in the VCD appears similar to a diagrammatic representation of a concentration gradient. As shown with the enlarged versions of the 10x5 μm red boxes in I, the lowest density of Dsh puncta are at the VCD edge, with increased density in the midway point, and the maximum density in the center. (J) Quantification of Dsh densities in the three regions of the VCD. The Dsh VCDs of 5 cortices each from three separate experiments were analyzed and the densities in these 3 regions are all statistically significantly different. (K-M) STED imaging of Dsh staining in the S. purpuratus egg VCD reveals that single punctum in confocal images (L, arrows) often appear as multiple spots in the higher resolution STED images (M, arrows). Scale bars = 5 μm.

Within the VCD the Dsh puncta were interspersed with actin filaments that were present in two basic organizations: bright foci representing filament aggregations within the cores of the short microvillar found on the surface of unfertilized eggs [29, 30], and, particularly in L. pictus cortices, faint long actin filaments running parallel to the plane of the plasma membrane (Fig 1D arrow). The more elongate microvillar actin staining pattern seen in the L. pictus egg cortices (Fig 1A–1D) relative to the more circular microvilli in S. purpuratus cortices (Fig 1E–1H) are indicative of species-specific differences in microvillar morphology [30]. Our 3D-SIM images did not suggest a direct interaction between microvillar actin arrays and Dsh puncta, although in other cells and tissues it has been suggested that Dsh interacts with actin filaments, particularly within stress fibers and focal adhesions [31, 32].

Platinum replica TEM of the egg VCD indicates that Dsh puncta consist of aggregates of pedestal-like structures

Immunogold labeling combined with platinum replica TEM of isolated egg cortices has allowed us to investigate the ultrastructure of the Dsh puncta visualized at the light microscopic level. Low magnification TEM images of cortices (Fig 2A–2D) labeled for Dsh with 18 nm colloidal gold (colored gold in Figs 2B–2D and 3A–3F, 3I, 3J) demonstrated a sparse array of gold decorated aggregates (arrows in Fig 2A) amongst a distribution of microvillar core (MV in Fig 2B) and submembranous actin filaments, as well as the remnants of membranous cortical granules (CG in Fig 2A), vesicles and endoplasmic reticulum. Higher magnification imaging (Fig 2E–2G) allowed for the identification of actin filaments (colored green in Fig 2E) due to their characteristic platinum replica TEM appearance [2527, 33] and revealed that Dsh labeled aggregates appeared in well-defined patches on the cytoplasmic face of the plasma membrane (colored magenta in Fig 2E). A gallery of Dsh-labeled aggregates (Fig 3A–3F) showed that single colloidal gold particles were located on the top of pedestal-shaped structures that grouped together into patches that were distinct from the surrounding plasma membrane and underlying meshwork of the vitelline envelope. Within the aggregates the labeled structures often appeared close together and on occasion adopted linear or ring-shaped arrangements (Fig 3E and 3F). The Dsh aggregates did not colocalize with the tangles of short actin filaments present in microvillar cores (Figs 2 and 3), however on occasion they appeared adjacent to the submembranous elongate actin filaments running parallel with the plane of the membrane (Figs 2E, 2F and 3A, 3C, 3F, 3I). In terms of quantitative analysis of TEM images, the density of Dsh aggregates in the TEM images fell within the range of those seen with light microscopy (Fig 3G), the overall average area of single Dsh labeled aggregates was 16,600 nm2 (Fig 3H; n = 6 cortices over 2 separate experiments), and there was no significant difference between the Dsh aggregate areas measured in the two species–S. purpuratus and L. pictus (Fig 3H). Comparison of regions of the same cortex that contained Dsh-labeled patches (Fig 3I) with areas that did not (Fig 3J) revealed that these unlabeled regions did not contain similar membrane-associated structures (Fig 3J), indicating that these structures were specific to the Dsh puncta in the VCD.

Fig 2. Platinum replica TEM of Dsh and actin in the VCD in cortices isolated from unfertilized eggs.

Fig 2

Low (A,C) to medium (B,D) magnification images of cortices shows Dsh-specific colloidal gold (colored gold in B-G) staining of patches in the plane of the membrane (arrows in A). Tangled knots of short actin filaments appear in the cores of microvilli (MV in B) and numerous elongate actin filaments running parallel to the plane of the membrane are present. Cortical granules appear as shriveled structures (CG in A) and other membranous structures are also present. The meshwork that appears in the background of the images corresponds to the vitelline envelope. The white box in C appears at higher magnification in E in which Dsh aggregates are colored magenta and identifiable actin filaments in green. Dsh positive patches do not associate with MV core actin assemblages but do come in close proximity to submembranous actin filaments. (F,G) High magnification images indicate that Dsh patches consist of aggregates of pedestal-like structures—each labeled with a single colloidal gold particle—that can be grouped into one or more clusters. L. pictus cortices = A,B,F,G; S. purpuratus cortices = C,D,E. Bar length indicated in the images.

Fig 3. Platinum replica TEM demonstrates that Dsh puncta correspond to patches of aggregates of pedestal-like structures.

Fig 3

(A-F) A gallery of high magnification images of Dsh labeled structures demonstrates that they consist of aggregates of pedestal-like structures in a variety of groupings. The top of each pedestal is labeled with a single colloidal gold particle suggesting that this area may correspond to the location of the C terminus of the Dsh protein. (G) The density of the Dsh puncta in TEM images from 3 separate cortices over three experiments (grey box) falls in the range of densities seen in the immunofluorescence images (black boxes reproduced from graph in Fig 1J). (H) The area of the Dsh aggregates from five cortices each from two separate experiments shows no statistically significant difference between the two species. (I,J) Comparison of regions of the same cortex in which Dsh labeling is present (I) and is not present (J) shows that the patches associated with the Dsh labeling are not visible in the unlabeled regions, suggesting that these structures are specific to the Dsh puncta. L. pictus cortices = A,B,D,E; S. purpuratus cortices = C,F,I,J. Scale bars = 200 nm.

Weitzel et al. [17] and Leonard and Ettensohn [18] conducted mutational analysis of the association of sea urchin Dsh-GFP with the VCD. Their results indicated that this localization could be abolished by deletion of the entire N terminus, the DIX domain, a double mutation within DIX (K57A, E58A), or a 21 amino acid motif between the PDZ and DEP domains. These results combined with our TEM images suggest that Dsh is oriented with its N terminal domain closer to the membrane which may explain why our SUDshC-terminus specific antibody appears to label the tops of the pedestal-like structures that are located farther away from the membrane surface. Dsh protein has also been shown to form oligomers via interactions between DIX domains in vitro and in vivo [34] and it is possible that the Dsh aggregates seen in our TEM images may represent some form of Dsh oligomerization in association with the membrane. A number of studies by Beinz and colleagues [3437] have indicated that Dsh oligomerization is critical for the formation of the cWnt signalosome and for increasing the affinity of binding to Axin that leads to the inactivation of the degradasomes that target β-catenin. In the sea urchin egg we have previously shown that the pool of Dsh in the VCD is differentially post-translationally modified compared to the Dsh not associated with the cortex [14]. Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that the Dsh aggregates that we have visualized correspond to a pre-positioned or “primed” cWnt signalosome precursor.

The Dsh VCD array is resistant to Triton detergent extraction, disruption of actin filaments, and inhibition of myosin II contraction

The punctate Dsh staining present in sea urchin eggs and embryos and in many other cell types has been hypothesized to be caused by an association of Dsh with intracellular vesicles [2, 17, 18]. We tested the nature of the interaction between the Dsh puncta and membranes by performing a 1% Triton X-100 detergent extraction of egg cortices immediately after isolation and prior to fixation. Dsh immunofluorescent staining of the VCD persisted following detergent extraction (Fig 4A–4H) suggesting that the Dsh is in a detergent resistant structure associated with the plasma membrane. The disruption of membranes by the Triton-based extraction of cortices was confirmed by the absence of cortical granules in phase contrast images of extracted cortices (Fig 4D and 4H), as well as the loss of the membrane-dependent fluorescent staining with the lipophilic dye FM1-43 (Fig 4I–4N). These results suggest that Dsh interacts with either detergent resistant regions of the membrane–such as lipid rafts which have been previously identified in sea urchin eggs [38]–and/or it may be binding to a detergent resistant membrane protein assemblage. This lack of detergent sensitivity argues against the association of Dsh with the membranes of cortex-associated vesicles in the VCD, which is agreement with studies in other cells suggesting that Dsh puncta are not associated with cytoplasmic vesicles [39]. This includes work in Xenopus oocytes and embryos in which vegetal pole-associated Dsh puncta are argued to help direct cWnt-dependent axis specification following cortical rotation [4042]. Tadjuidje et al. [42] have reported that Xenopus oocytes depleted of maternal Dsh (Dvl2/3) RNA still can activate cWnt signaling and that this derives from the persistence of Dsh puncta in the submembranous region of the vegetal cortex. These Dsh puncta did not codistribute with markers for endosomes, exocytotic vesicles or lysosomes and therefore do not appear associated with vesicles and may instead correspond to protein aggregates [42].

Fig 4. The Dsh VCD array is resistant to Triton detergent extraction.

Fig 4

(A-H) Control unfertilized egg cortex from L. pictus (A-D) stained for Dsh (magenta) and actin (green) showing Dsh array and cortical granules in phase contrast. The Triton extracted cortex (E-H) demonstrates the persistence of the Dsh array following detergent extraction despite the loss of cortical granules seen in phase contrast. (I-N) Membrane staining with the fixable dye FM1-43 (green) shows that in control unfertilized egg cortices (I-K) that the Dsh (magenta) array is present along with a variety of membranous structures. In detergent extracted cortices (L-N) the Dsh array is still present even though specific membrane staining is lost. Scale bars = 10 μm.

Our earlier work has indicated that the Dsh VCD localization in the sea urchin egg is sensitive to disruption of actin filaments using the drugs cytochalasin B and D and >2 hour incubation periods following a 20 min drug treatment [14]. In addition, studies in other cell types have argued for an interaction between Dsh and actin filaments [31, 32]. We tested the association between actin and Dsh in the short term using the drug Latrunculin A (LatA). Unlike the cytochalasins that tend to interfere with actin monomer addition to the plus end, LatA disrupts actin filaments primarily via monomer binding and subsequent sequestration. We treated embryos with 1 μM LatA for 20 min followed by isolation of cortices and anti-Dsh immunofluorescent staining. Dsh labeling of the VCD was maintained in LatA treated egg cortices even though the LatA led to a clear disruption of cortical actin filaments (Fig 5D–5F).

Fig 5. The Dsh VCD persists following disruption of actin filaments or inhibition of myosin II contraction.

Fig 5

Control unfertilized egg cortex from L. pictus (A-C) contains the expected Dsh array (magenta) along with microvillar actin (green). In cortices from eggs treated with the actin filament disrupting drug LatA (D-F) the Dsh array persists (D) whereas the actin staining is greatly reduced (E). Both Dsh (G) and actin (H) staining appear unaffected in cortices isolated from unfertilized eggs treated with the MLCK inhibitor ML-7 (G-I) in order to inhibit myosin II contraction. Scale bar = 10 μm; magnifications of A-I are equivalent.

We also tested for the potential involvement of myosin II in the Dsh VCD localization given that the actomyosin cortex has been shown to influence the asymmetric distribution of the important polarity determining PAR protein complex in C. elegans [43, 44] and sea urchin [45] embryos. In sea urchins, the apical PAR localization was disrupted by treating embryos with the myosin II light chain kinase (MLCK) inhibitor ML-7 [45]. MLCK inhibition is known to block myosin II bipolar filament assembly and the enhancement of actin activated ATPase activity, and ML-7 has been used extensively as a myosin II inhibitor in previous studies on sea urchin embryos [4548]. We treated eggs with 50 μM ML-7 for 20 min and then isolated the cortices and stained for Dsh. ML-7 treatment had no impact on Dsh VCD localization or actin distribution in the egg cortices (Fig 5G–5I).

The Dsh VCD array is bisected by the cytokinetic contractile ring in isolated cortices of first cleavage embryos

The Dsh VCD array persists post-fertilization [14, 17, 18] despite the extensive remodeling of the plasma membrane caused by the mass exocytosis of cortical granules followed by the endocytic uptake of membrane [49]. We investigated the behavior of the Dsh VCD array in early cleavage embryos by labeling cortices isolated from first division embryos with Dsh and probes specific for the cytokinetic contractile ring proteins myosin II and actin. We were interested in the relationship between the Dsh VCD array and the contractile ring given that our earlier work [27] has indicated that the contractile ring consists of a very dense assemblage of actin and myosin II filaments in close association with the plasma membrane. Previous work with either Dsh:GFP [17] or Dsh immunofluorescent labeling of whole embryos [14] has suggested that the first division cleavage furrow bisects the Dsh VCD. Cortices stained for Dsh and activated myosin II via staining with an antibody against the Ser19 phosphorylated version of the myosin II regulatory light chain (P-MyoRLC) revealed that the Dsh array coexisted with the contractile ring in regions in which they are both found (Figs 6 and 7). In the majority of isolated cleavage cortices, the Dsh distribution appeared to be bisected by the contractile ring structure (Figs 6 and 7), as would be expected for the two daughter cells to inherit roughly equivalent amounts of the VCD. In addition, the Dsh VCD array in first cleavage cortices differed from the VCD in unfertilized eggs in terms of the uniformity of the appearance and distribution of the Dsh puncta, as well as a significantly lower maximum density (unpaired t-test; p<0.0001) in the central VCD (Fig 7; n = 6 UF and CL cortices each from 2 separate experiments). These changes in the Dsh puncta may be the result of the extensive restructuring of the cortex that takes place post fertilization and with the onset of first cleavage [49], and/or may be the result of Dsh puncta dynamics, to include potential coalescence.

Fig 6. The Dsh VCD in cortices isolated from first cleavage embryos is bisected by the cytokinetic contractile ring.

Fig 6

Widefield microscopy of cortices isolated from first division S. purpuratus embryos indicate that the Dsh punctate VCD array (A,E,I,N; magenta in C,G,L,Q) is often bisected by the cytokinetic contractile ring which labels for activated myosin II (P-MyoRLC; B,F,J,O; green in C,G,L,Q) and F-actin (K,P; blue in L,Q). Transmitted light DIC (D,H at equivalent magnification) and phase contrast (insets M,R at reduced magnification) images of individual cortices are provided for context. Scale bar = 10 μm, magnifications of A-L and N-Q are all equivalent.

Fig 7. Comparison of the Dsh VCD in cortices isolated from unfertilized eggs versus first cleavage embryos.

Fig 7

Widefield microscopy of the Dsh VCD in unfertilized (UF) egg (A,B) and first cleavage (CL) embryo (D,E) S. purpuratus cortices highlights the differences in the two arrays. Panels B and E correspond to higher magnification versions of the 5x5 μm white boxes in panels A and C. Panel D shows P-MyoRLC staining of the actomyosin contractile ring in the CL cortex seen at higher magnification in C. The maximum density of Dsh puncta in the central VCD in CL cortices is statistically less dense than in the central VCD of UF egg cortices (F), and the puncta appear not as uniform in structure or distribution (A,B,C,E). Scale bars = 10 μm.

Conclusions

Despite some 25 years of research effort, aspects of the activation, regulation and localization of the central cWnt pathway protein Dsh remain enigmatic [24]. In the present study we use super-resolution and platinum replica transmission electron microscopy imaging of the sea urchin VCD to provide the first visualization of the nanoscale structural organization of membrane tethered Dsh. We show that Dsh is found associated with pedestal-like structures organized into aggregates located in the plane of the membrane, and that these clusters are resistant to detergent extraction and to treatment with inhibitors of actin polymerization and myosin II contraction. We also demonstrate that the Dsh VCD punctate arrays codistribute with the dense filamentous structure of the cytokinetic contractile ring in first division embryos. The general structural organization of membrane tethered Dsh that we have characterized in the sea urchin VCD may be applicable to the plasma membrane-associated Dsh puncta apparent in many cell types and particularly to those found in the vegetal cortex of Xenopus oocytes [4042].

We speculate that the Dsh labeling in the sea urchin VCD could correspond to oligomers of Dsh present in the puncta and that our anti-SUDsh-C terminus antibody is labeling the end of the protein that is farthest from the surface of the membrane. Another intriguing possibility is that the Dsh aggregates might represent biomolecular condensates that have become associated with the membrane surface, as membranes have been argued to be one of the control centers of phase separation in a number of cell types [50] and condensates have been argued to play important roles in cWnt signaling [51]. The major Wnt pathway proteins Dsh, Axin, and APC all contain the condensate-requiring intrinsically disordered regions and have been shown to form dynamic, non-membrane enclosed puncta in cells, which suggests that the β-catenin destruction complex and the Dsh-dependent signalosome correspond to different forms of related biomolecular condensates [34, 51]. It is intriguing that in sea urchins [14] and in Xenopus [40] Dsh associated with vegetal puncta undergo postranslational modifications that correlate with cWnt activation. Our current working hypothesis is that the Dsh aggregates visualized in the present study correspond to a pre-positioned scaffold of a cWnt signalosome precursor that favors β-catenin signaling at the vegetal pole of the sea urchin embryo. Future studies will concentrate on establishing the localization and dynamics of other constituents of the cWnt signalosome, such as the sea urchin homologues of Fz, LRP5/6, and Axin.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Data used for graphs in Figs 1J, 3G, 3H and 7F plus statistical analysis.

(A) Shows density of Dsh puncta per square micron for LM regions of VCD (edge, midway and center) and TEM images used for graphs in Figs 1J and 3G. (B) One-way ANOVA analysis of Dsh puncta per square micron data for three LM regions of VCD shown in graph in Fig 1J. (C) Dsh aggregate area for TEM images of UF cortices from the two species which appears in graph in Fig 3H. (D) Results of t-test analysis of Dsh aggregate area data in panel C and Fig 3H. (E) Data for comparing Dsh puncta density in the central VCD in unfertilized eggs vs. first cleavage stage embryos shown in the graph in Fig 7F. (F) Results of t-test of analysis of Dsh punctate density data in panel E and Fig 7F.

(PDF)

S1 Spreadsheet. Data used for graphs in Figs 1J, 3G, 3H and 7F.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the expert assistance of Dr. Xufeng Wu (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health) with 3D-SIM imaging, of Dr. Simon Watkins and Michael Calderon (Center for Biologic Imaging, University of Pittsburgh) with STED imaging, and Drs. Tanya Svitkina and Changsong Yang (University of Pennsylvania) with platinum replica TEM methods. Ethan Burg, Zoe Irons, Quenelle McKim and Hannah Herzon (Dickinson College) helped with experiments and/or image analysis. Thanks are also extended to Dr. Billie Swalla (University of Washington) for access to instrumentation and reagents while we were in summer residence at Friday Harbor Laboratories.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

Funding from collaborative National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov) grants to J.H.H.(MCB-1917976) and C.B.S. (MCB-1917983). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Logan CY, Nusse R. The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004; 20: 781–810. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.010403.113126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wallingford JB, Habas R. The developmental biology of Dishevelled: an enigmatic protein governing cell fate and cell polarity. Development. 2005; 132: 4421–4436. 10.1242/dev.02068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gao C, Chen Y-G. Dishevelled: the hub of Wnt signaling. Cell Signal. 2010; 22: 717–727. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.11.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sharma M, Castro-Piedras I, Simmons GE Jr, Pruitt K. Dishevelled: a masterful conductor of complex Wnt signals. Cell Signal. 2018; 47: 52–64. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2018.03.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mlodzik M. The Dishevelled protein family: still rather a mystery after over 20 years of molecular studies. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2016; 117: 75–91. 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2015.11.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Angerer LM, Angerer RC. Animal–vegetal axis patterning mechanisms in the early sea urchin embryo. Dev Biol 2000; 218: 1–12. 10.1006/dbio.1999.9553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Croce JC, McClay DR. The canonical Wnt pathway in embryonic axis polarity. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2006; 17: 168–174. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kumburegama S, Wikramanayake AH. Wnt signaling in the early sea urchin embryo. Methods Mol Biol. 2008; 469: 187–199. 10.1007/978-1-60327-469-2_14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wikramanayake AH, Huang L, Klein WH. β-catenin is essential for patterning the maternally specified animal-vegetal axis in the sea urchin embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.1998; 95: 9343–9348. 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Logan CY, Miller JR, Ferkowicz MJ, McClay DR. Nuclear β-catenin is required to specify vegetal cell fates in the sea urchin embryo. Development.1999; 126: 345–357. 10.1007/978-1-60327-469-2_14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wikramanayake AH, Peterson R, Chen J, Huang L, Bince JM. Nuclear beta-catenin-dependent Wnt8 signaling in vegetal cells of the early sea urchin embryo regulates gastrulation and differentiation of endoderm and mesoderm cell lineages. Genesis. 2004; 39: 194–205. 10.1002/gene.20045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Croce J, Range R, Wu S-Y, Miranda E, Lhomond G, Pang JC, et al. Wnt6 activates endoderm in the sea urchin gene regulatory network. Development. 2011; 138: 3297–3306. 10.1242/dev.058792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lhomond G, McClay DR, Gache C, Croce JC. Frizzled1/2/7 signaling directs beta-catenin nuclearisation and initiates endoderm specification in macromeres during sea urchin embryogenesis. Development. 2012; 139: 816–825. 10.1242/dev.072215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Peng CJ, Wikramanayake AH. Differential regulation of Disheveled in a novel vegetal cortical domain in sea urchin eggs and embryos: implications for the localized activation of canonical Wnt signaling. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e80693. 10.1371/journal.pone.0080693 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Croce JC, Wu S-Y, Xu R, Duloquin L, Wikramanayake AH, Gache C, et al. A genome-wide survey of the evolutionary conserved Wnt pathways in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Dev Biol. 2006; 300: 121–131. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stamateris RE, Rafiq K, Ettensohn CA. The expression and distribution of Wnt and Wnt receptor mRNAs during early sea urchin development. Gene Expr Patterns. 2010; 10: 60–64. 10.1016/j.gep.2009.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Weitzel HE, Illies MR, Byrum CA, Xu R, Wikramanayake AH, Ettensohn CA. Differential stability of beta-catenin along the animal-vegetal axis of the sea urchin embryo mediated by Dishevelled. Development. 2004; 131: 2947–2956. 10.1242/dev.01152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Leonard JD, Ettensohn CA. Analysis of Dishevelled localization and function in the early sea urchin embryo. Dev Biol. 2007; 306: 50–65. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.02.041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ma W, Chen M, Kang H, Steinhart Z, Angers S, He X, et al. Single-molecule dynamics of Dishevelled at the plasma membrane and Wnt pathway activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020; 117: 1690–16701. 10.1073/pnas.1910547117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Smalley MJ, Signoret N, Robertson D, Tilley A, Hann A, Ewan K, et al. Dishevelled (Dvl-2) activates canonical Wnt signaling in the absence of cytoplasmic puncta. J Cell Sci. 2005; 118: 5279–5289. 10.1242/jcs.02647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Henson JH, Samasa B, Burg EC. High resolution imaging of the cortex isolated from sea urchin eggs and embryos. Methods Cell Biol. 2019; 151: 419–432. 10.1016/bs.mcb.2019.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Terasaki M. Visualization of exocytosis during sea urchin egg fertilization using confocal microscopy. J Cell Sci. 1995; 108: 2293–2300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gustafsson MG, Shao L, Carlton PM, Wang CJR., Golubovskaya IN, Cande WZ, et al. Three-dimensional resolution doubling in wide-field fluorescence microscopy by structured illumination. Biophys J. 2008; 94: 4957–497. 10.1529/biophysj.107.120345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hell SW, Wichmann J. Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. Optics Letters. 1994; 19: 780–782. 10.1364/ol.19.000780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Svitkina T. Electron microscopic analysis of the leading edge in migrating cells. Methods Cell Biol. 2007; 79: 295–319. 10.1016/S0091-679X(06)79012-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Svitkina T. Imaging cytoskeleton components by electron microscopy. Methods Mol Biol. 2016; 1365: 99–118. 10.1007/978-1-4939-3124-8_5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Henson JH, Ditzler CE, Germain A, Irwin PM, Vogt ET, Yang S, et al. The ultrastructural organization of actin and myosin II filaments in the contractile ring: new support for an old model of cytokinesis. Mol Biol Cell. 2017; 28: 613–623. 10.1091/mbc.E16-06-0466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schermelleh L., Heintzmann R., Leonhardt H. A guide to super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. J Cell Biol. 2010; 190: 165–175. 10.1083/jcb.201002018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sardet C. The ultrastructure of the sea urchin egg cortex isolated before and after fertilization. Dev Biol. 1984; 105: 196–210. 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90275-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Henson JH, Begg DA. Filamentous actin organization in the unfertilized sea urchin egg cortex. Dev Biol. 1988; 127: 338–348. 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90320-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Torres MA, Nelson WJ. Colocalization and redistribution of dishevelled and actin during Wnt-induced mesenchymal morphogenesis. J Cell Biol 2000; 149: 1433–1442. 10.1083/jcb.149.7.1433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Capelluto DG, Kutateladze TG, Habas R, Finkielstein CV, He X, Overduin M. The DIX domain targets dishevelled to actin stress fibers and vesicular membranes. Nature. 2002; 419: 726–729. 10.1038/nature01056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Henson JH, Yeterian M, Weeks RM, Medrano AE, Brown BL, Geist HL, et al. Arp2/3 complex inhibition radically alters lamellipodial actin architecture, suspended cell shape, and the cell spreading process. Mol Biol Cell 2015; 26: 887–900. 10.1091/mbc.E14-07-1244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gammons M, Bienz M. Multiprotein complexes governing Wnt signaling transduction. Curr Op Cell Biol. 2018; 51: 42–49. 10.1016/j.ceb.2017.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bienz M. Signalosome assembly by domains undergoing dynamic head-to-tail polymerization. Trends Biochem Sci. 2014; 39: 487–495. 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gammons MV, Rutherford TJ, Steinhart Z, Angers S, Bienz M. Essential role of the Dishevelled DEP domain in a Wnt- dependent human-cell-based complementation assay. J Cell Sci. 2016; 129: 3892–3902. 10.1242/jcs.195685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kan W, Enos MD, Korkmazhan E, Muennich S, Chen D-H, Gammons MV, et al. Limited disheveled/Axin oligomerization determines efficiency of Wnt/β-catenin signal transduction. eLife. 2020; 9: e55015. 10.7554/eLife.55015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Belton RJ Jr, Adams NL, Foltz KR. Isolation and characterization of sea urchin egg lipid rafts and their possible function during fertilization. Mol Reprod Dev. 2001; 59: 294–305 10.1002/mrd.1034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Schwarz-Romond T, Merrifield C, Nichols BJ, Bienz M. The Wnt signaling effector Dishevelled forms dynamic protein assemblies rather than stable associations with cytoplasmic vesicles. J Cell Sci. 2005; 118: 5269–5277. 10.1242/jcs.02646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Miller JR, Rowning BA, Larabell CA, Yang-Snyder JA, Bates RL, Moon RT. Establishment of the dorsal-ventral axis in Xenopus embryos coincides with the dorsal enrichment of Dishevelled that is dependent on cortical rotation. J Cell Biol. 1999; 146: 427–437. 10.1083/jcb.146.2.427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Weaver C, Kimelman D. Move it or lose it: axis specification in Xenopus. Development. 2004; 131: 3491–3499. 10.1242/dev.01284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tadjuidje E, Sang-Wook C, Louza M, Wylie C, Heasman J. The functions of maternal Dishevelled 2 and 3 in the early Xenopus embryo. Dev Dynamics. 2011; 240: 1727–1736. 10.1002/dvdy.22671 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cowan CR, Hyman AA. Asymmetric cell division in C. elegans: cortical polarity and spindle positioning. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004; 20: 427–453. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111301.113823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Munro E, Nance J, Priess JR. Cortical flows powered by asymmetrical contraction transport PAR proteins to establish and maintain anterior-posterior poclarity in the early C. elegans embryo. Dev Cell. 2004; 7: 413–424. 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Moorhouse KS, Gudejko HFM, McDougall A, Burgess DR. Influence of cell polarity on early development of the sea urchin embryo. Dev Dynamics. 2015; 244: 1469–1484. 10.1002/dvdy.24337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Miyoshi H, Satoh SK, Yamada E, Hamaguchi Y. Temporal change in local forces and total force all over the surface of the sea urchin egg during cytokinesis. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2006; 63: 208– 221. 10.1002/cm.20118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lucero A, Stack C, Bresnick AR, Shuster CB. A global, myosin light chain kinase-dependent increase in myosin II contractility accompanies the metaphase-anaphase transition in sea urchin eggs. Mol Biol Cell. 2006; 17: 4093–4104. 10.1091/mbc.e06-02-0119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Uehara R, Hosoya H, Mabuchi I. In vivo phosphorylation of regulatory light chain of myosin II in sea urchin eggs and its role in controlling myosin localization and function during cytokinesis Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2008; 65: 100–115. 10.1002/cm.20246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Trimmer JS, Vacquier VD. Activation of sea urchin gametes. Ann Rev Cell Biol. 1986; 2: 1–26. 10.1146/annurev.cb.02.110186.000245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Snead WT, Gladfelter AS. The control centers of biomolecular phase separation: how membrane surfaces, PTMs, and active processes regulate condensation. Mol Cell. 2019; 76: 295–305. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.09.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Schaefer KN, Peifer M. Wnt/Beta-Catenin signaling regulation and a role for biomolecular condensates. Dev Cell. 2019; 48: 429–444. 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.01.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Michael Klymkowsky

23 Mar 2021

PONE-D-21-05530

The nanoscale organization of the Wnt signaling integrator Dishevelled in the development-essential vegetal cortex domain of an egg and early embryo

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Henson,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please addressed all of the reviewers comments point by point.  I think  I agree with the second reviewer that title might be better - perhaps something like "Nanoscale organization of the Wnt signaling integrator Dishevelled in the vegetal domain of the sea urchin egg and early embryo".  But I leave that to you.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 07 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Michael Klymkowsky, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors of "The nanoscale organization of the Wnt signaling integrator Dishevelled in the development-essential vegetal cortex domain of an egg and early embryo" offer a beautiful set of images showing ever more clearly the localisation of Dvl in the VCD. The transition form SIM to STED to TEM is particularly effective. There are a couple of issues that should be addressed.

1. Looking at the references cited, and the general discussion of Dvl puncta, the authors do not address the current view of signalling activation through a transition from degradation complexes to activation signalosomes as most recently detailed by work from the Bienz lab and others. The working hypothesis at the end of the Conclusion section is very vague.

2. From the images: Figure 2, the text states "colored gold in Fig 2A-D, but this color was difficult to see in the image.

3. The authors focus on canonical signaling, but the images in fig 2 show some Dsh puncta at the ends of actin filaments so could this not also suggest polarity signaling?

4. In figure 6, are the colors not reversed in panel L? Again here, the correlation is between polarity and not canonical signaling, or did I misunderstand the intent.

Overall, the focus on Dvl localization is informative, but Dvl is central to the canonical pathway and to the non-canonical pathways so unless downstream activity is monitored, it isn't obvious why the authors say this is a canonical pathway effect.

Reviewer #2: This is a very valuable study that provides the first high-resolution imaging of Dsh-associate structures in the sea urchin egg, with implications for the organization of Dsh in many other animal oocytes and early embryos. The images, even the low-resolution versions in the PDF provided for review, are striking. The study reveals that Dsh puncta (as defined by conventional epifluorescence imaging) are composed of several sub-puncta that sit on pedestal-like structures. It clarifies the relation between Dsh puncta and a) cortical/microvillar actin and b) detergent-soluble membranes.

I believe the paper could be strengthened in two ways, although I don’t consider these pre-requisites for publication:

1) Since the result with ML-7 is negative (i.e., it has no effect on Dsh localization), there need to be some positive controls to indicate that the drug is effective at inhibiting myosin II at the concentrations used and in this species.

2) The authors suggest that the Dsh VCD array in first division cortices is not as highly ordered as in egg cortices- they say (L406-408) that the VCD “often does not closely resemble a concentration gradient pattern and the individual puncta appear larger and less densely distributed (Fig 6).”. It would be valuable to support these anecdotal statements with real measurements. I’m also curious as to how the authors interpret such changes- are they suggesting that Dsh puncta disassemble after fertilization, perhaps in a non-random way? How could a graded distribution be converted into a non-graded distribution?

Minor suggestions:

1) The title is clumsy- I would remove “development essential”

2) In the abstract, define definitions (SIM, STED, TEM)

3) In the abstract- “the concentration gradient-like distribution” is clumsy- just say “graded distribution”

4) L91 “Even though Dsh is maternally expressed uniformly in the egg and early embryo [16,17]” Change “Dsh” to “Dsh mRNA”

5) Clarify stages shown in some of the figures. “Egg” can mean different things to different people so better to say “unfertilized egg” if that’s what is shown.

6) The authors refer to the K57A, E58A as affecting a phospholipid-binding region of DIX but this was originally based on the old Overduin 2002 study and I believe since then data from the Bienz lab have instead implicated these mutations in DIX oligomerization.

7) Reference list- the Tadjuidje reference is missing a few words

8) L444- what is meant by an “autonomous” scaffold?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 May 26;16(5):e0248197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248197.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


4 May 2021

Response to Reviewers

First, we would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments and emphasize that we have made every effort to address their concerns. Our point by point responses to their reviews appear below. Second, our revision includes some additional quantitative analysis of the images represented by the graphs in Figs 1J, 3G and 3H. Additional measurements of TEM images were performed for both density (Fig 3G) and aggregate area (Fig 3H) measurements, with the area measurements recategorized by individual species. This emphasized the lack of significant difference in the areas of the Dsh aggregates that appear in L. pictus and S. purpuratus egg cortices. In the interest of data transparency, we also decided to show all the data points (as red circles) in the graphs in Figs 1J, 3G, 3H and 7F, as well as submit supplementary information files (S1 Table and S2 Spreadsheet) showing all the data used to build the graphs and statistical analyses.

Reviewer #1: The authors of "The nanoscale organization of the Wnt signaling integrator Dishevelled in the development-essential vegetal cortex domain of an egg and early embryo" offer a beautiful set of images showing ever more clearly the localisation of Dvl in the VCD. The transition from SIM to STED to TEM is particularly effective. There are a couple of issues that should be addressed.

1. Looking at the references cited, and the general discussion of Dvl puncta, the authors do not address the current view of signaling activation through a transition from degradation complexes to activation signalosomes as most recently detailed by work from the Bienz lab and others. The working hypothesis at the end of the Conclusion section is very vague.

We’ve addressed the first suggestion referring to the work by Bienz and colleagues by expanding a section of the Results and Discussion on page 10, lines 323-326 that originally referred to the possible role of Dsh oligomers reviewed in Gammons and Beinz (2018). This new section references 4 studies by Bienz and coworkers (2014; 2016; 2018; 2020) that highlight the critical role of Dsh oligomerization in the formation of the Wnt signalosome and how this structure recruits Axin in order to inhibit the -catenin destruction complexes. Below is this new section (italicized) found on page 10, lines 329-335 in the revised manuscript:

“Dsh protein has also been shown to form oligomers via interactions between DIX domains in vitro and in vivo [34] and it is possible that the Dsh aggregates seen in our TEM images may represent some form of Dsh oligomerization in association with the membrane. A number of studies by Beinz and colleagues [34-37] have indicated that Dsh oligomerization is critical for the formation of the cWnt signalosome and for increasing the affinity of binding to Axin that leads to the inactivation of the degradasomes that target -catenin. In the sea urchin egg we have previously shown that the pool of Dsh in the VCD is differentially post-translationally modified compared to the pool of Dsh not associated with the cortex [14]. Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that the Dsh aggregates that we have visualized correspond to a pre-positioned or “primed” cWnt signalosome precursor.”

We’ve addressed the second comment about the vague nature of the working hypothesis in the Conclusions section by rewriting this sentence (page 14, lines 467-471) as follows:

“Our current working hypothesis is that the Dsh aggregates visualized in the present study correspond to a pre-positioned scaffold of a cWnt signalosome precursor that favors -catenin signaling at the vegetal pole of the embryo. Future studies will concentrate on establishing the localization and dynamics of other constituents of the cWnt signalosome, such as the sea urchin homologues of Fz, LRP5/6, and Axin.”

2. From the images: Figure 2, the text states "colored gold in Fig 2A-D”, but this color was difficult to see in the image.

The lower resolution images in the reviewer’s version of the figures may have made it difficult to discern the colored colloidal gold particles, especially in the lower magnification images present in panels A-D. In panel A the magnification is sufficiently low that the gold particles are too small to be colored so we now refer to gold colored particles only in panels B-G in the Fig 2 legend. Readers of the higher resolution published version of this paper will have the ability to zoom in on this figure in order to more easily visualize the colored particles.

3. The authors focus on canonical signaling, but the images in Fig 2 show some Dsh puncta at the ends of actin filaments so could this not also suggest polarity signaling?

We can’t rule out an association between actin filaments and Dsh in the VCD, however our TEM images by and large don’t demonstrate a close association between the two. In addition, Fig 5D-F shows that Dsh staining remains in cortices in which F-actin staining has been lost due to treatment with Latrunculin A. Our previous published work (Peng and Wikramanayake, 2013) also demonstrated that Dsh puncta remained - at least for 2 hours - in whole eggs treated with the actin filament disrupting drugs cytochalasin B and D.

4. In figure 6, are the colors not reversed in panel L? Again here, the correlation is between polarity and not canonical signaling, or did I misunderstand the intent.

The colors of Dsh and P-MyoRLC were indeed incorrectly assigned in Fig 6L and we have corrected them in the revised version of the figure.

In Fig 6 we are highlighting the persistence of the Dsh VCD array even in the midst of the dense contractile ring structure that we have previously defined (Henson et al., 2017), and that the Dsh array is typically split between the two blastomeres during first division. Our previous work (Peng and Wikarmanayake, 2013) has indicated that as the embryo continues to divide that the Dsh VCD remains at the vegetal pole which by the 60-cell stage corresponds to the cells that show the cWnt pathway characteristic of nuclear localization of -catenin.

Overall, the focus on Dvl localization is informative, but Dvl is central to the canonical pathway and to the non-canonical pathways so unless downstream activity is monitored, it isn't obvious why the authors say this is a canonical pathway effect.

As we have indicated in the Introduction section of the manuscript, the early sea urchin embryo is a model system for studying how the cWnt pathway regulates AV/AP axis determination via the activation of -catenin regulated gene expression. -catenin nuclearization in the vegetal blastomeres of the 60-cell late blastula/early gastrula embryo is a crucial determinant of endomesodermal specification and the maturation of the AV/AP axis. The Dsh VCD that we characterize in the present study marks the vegetal pole of the egg and early embryo and as such serves as a predeterminant for cWnt signaling-based -catenin stabilization. Localized determinants of -catenin stabilization such as the Dsh VCD in the sea urchin are characteristic of vegetal/posterior pole determination in all invertebrate deuterostome embryos that have been studied to date. Therefore, although we can’t absolutely negate the possibility that the sea urchin Dsh VCD plays some yet to be defined role in ncWnt signaling, we are much more confident of its role in cWnt signaling and have concentrated on that.

Reviewer #2: This is a very valuable study that provides the first high-resolution imaging of Dsh-associate structures in the sea urchin egg, with implications for the organization of Dsh in many other animal oocytes and early embryos. The images, even the low-resolution versions in the PDF provided for review, are striking. The study reveals that Dsh puncta (as defined by conventional epifluorescence imaging) are composed of several sub-puncta that sit on pedestal-like structures. It clarifies the relation between Dsh puncta and a) cortical/microvillar actin and b) detergent-soluble membranes.

I believe the paper could be strengthened in two ways, although I don’t consider these pre-requisites for publication:

1) Since the result with ML-7 is negative (i.e., it has no effect on Dsh localization), there need to be some positive controls to indicate that the drug is effective at inhibiting myosin II at the concentrations used and in this species.

Our previous published work using 50 µM of ML-7 to treat L. pictus embryos (Lucero et al., 2006. Mol. Biol. Cell 17:4093-4103; reference #47 in the manuscript) has shown that this concentration of the drug completely inhibits the myosin II-based increase in cortical contractility that accompanies the first division metaphase-anaphase transition, as well as cytokinesis.

2) The authors suggest that the Dsh VCD array in first division cortices is not as highly ordered as in egg cortices- they say (L406-408) that the VCD “often does not closely resemble a concentration gradient pattern and the individual puncta appear larger and less densely distributed (Fig 6).”. It would be valuable to support these anecdotal statements with real measurements. I’m also curious as to how the authors interpret such changes- are they suggesting that Dsh puncta disassemble after fertilization, perhaps in a non-random way? How could a graded distribution be converted into a non-graded distribution?

As a result of new experimentation, we are able to at least partially address the reviewer’s request that we provide additional information about the differences between the Dsh VCD in cortices isolated from unfertilized eggs versus first cleavage embryos. In a new Figure 7 (plus legend) we provide a direct comparison between a Dsh VCD in an egg (7A,B) and one in a first division embryo (7C,E) at equivalent low (7A,C) and high (7B,E) magnifications. In Figure 7F we show a graph of the density of Dsh puncta in the center of the VCD in egg and cleaving embryo cortices which demonstrates a statistically significantly higher density of Dsh puncta in the egg cortex. We also added a new section that speculates about how the Dsh VCD is changing which appears near the top of page 13 and is reproduced in italics below. However, we think that our current understanding of Dsh dynamics in the early embryo is too preliminary to address whether Dsh puncta disassemble or how the VCD distributions might be transformed. This must await the results of future experiments concentrating on the live cell imaging of Dsh during embryogenesis.

“In addition, the Dsh VCD array in first cleavage cortices differed from the VCD in unfertilized eggs in terms of the uniformity of the appearance and distribution of the Dsh puncta, as well as a significantly lower maximum density (unpaired t-test; p<0.0001) in the central VCD (Fig 7; n = 8 UF and CL cortices each from 2 separate experiments). These changes in the Dsh puncta may be the result of the extensive restructuring of the cortex that takes place post fertilization and with the onset of first cleavage [49], and/or may be the result of Dsh puncta dynamics, to include potential coalescence.”

Minor suggestions:

1) The title is clumsy- I would remove “development essential”.

This has been removed. The new title is “Nanoscale organization of the Wnt signaling integrator Dishevelled in the vegetal cortex domain of an egg and early embryo”. We decided to leave sea urchin out of the title in the hope that this would stimulate more general interest in the paper, given that vegetal pole concentrations of Dsh are not exclusive to sea urchin eggs/embryos.

2) In the abstract, define definitions (SIM, STED, TEM).

These abbreviations/acronyms have been defined in the abstract.

3) In the abstract- “the concentration gradient-like distribution” is clumsy- just say “graded distribution”.

This has been changed.

4) L91 “Even though Dsh is maternally expressed uniformly in the egg and early embryo [16,17]” Change “Dsh” to “Dsh mRNA”.

This has been changed.

5) Clarify stages shown in some of the figures. “Egg” can mean different things to different people so better to say “unfertilized egg” if that’s what is shown.

“Unfertilized egg” has been added to the figure legends of Figs 1, 2, 4, and 5.

6) The authors refer to the K57A, E58A as affecting a phospholipid-binding region of DIX but this was originally based on the old Overduin 2002 study and I believe since then data from the Bienz lab have instead implicated these mutations in DIX oligomerization.

On page 10 we deleted the phrase that identified the K57A, E58A double mutant as being a phospholipid binding region of DIX. The current sentence reads as follows:

“Their results indicated that this localization could be abolished by deletion of the entire N terminus, the DIX domain, a double mutation within DIX (K57A, E58A), or a 21 amino acid motif between the PDZ and DEP domains.”

7) Reference list- the Tadjuidje reference is missing a few words.

This reference title has been corrected to read: “The functions of maternal Dishevelled 2 and 3 in the early Xenopus embryo.”

8) L444- what is meant by an “autonomous” scaffold?

The word “autonomous” has been deleted in this sentence and the sentence has been rewritten in response to a suggestion from another reviewer. It now reads: “Our current working hypothesis is that the Dsh aggregates visualized in the present study correspond to a pre-positioned scaffold of cWnt signalosome precursor that favors -catenin signaling at the vegetal pole of the sea urchin embryo.”

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Michael Klymkowsky

12 May 2021

The nanoscale organization of the Wnt signaling integrator Dishevelled in the vegetal cortex domain of an egg and early embryo

PONE-D-21-05530R1

Dear Dr. Henson,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Michael Klymkowsky, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The reviewers' comments have been addressed and the manuscript can now be published. The data is well presented and of interest to the field.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Michael Klymkowsky

17 May 2021

PONE-D-21-05530R1

The nanoscale organization of the Wnt signaling integrator Dishevelled in the vegetal cortex domain of an egg and early embryo

Dear Dr. Henson:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Michael Klymkowsky

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Data used for graphs in Figs 1J, 3G, 3H and 7F plus statistical analysis.

    (A) Shows density of Dsh puncta per square micron for LM regions of VCD (edge, midway and center) and TEM images used for graphs in Figs 1J and 3G. (B) One-way ANOVA analysis of Dsh puncta per square micron data for three LM regions of VCD shown in graph in Fig 1J. (C) Dsh aggregate area for TEM images of UF cortices from the two species which appears in graph in Fig 3H. (D) Results of t-test analysis of Dsh aggregate area data in panel C and Fig 3H. (E) Data for comparing Dsh puncta density in the central VCD in unfertilized eggs vs. first cleavage stage embryos shown in the graph in Fig 7F. (F) Results of t-test of analysis of Dsh punctate density data in panel E and Fig 7F.

    (PDF)

    S1 Spreadsheet. Data used for graphs in Figs 1J, 3G, 3H and 7F.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES