Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2021 Apr 20;6(17):11260–11265. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c00106

Formation of Formic Acid from Glucose with Simultaneous Conversion of Ag2O to Ag under Mild Hydrothermal Conditions

Runtian He 1, Teng Ma 1, Jiong Cheng 1, Binbin Jin 1, Jing Xu 1,*
PMCID: PMC8153907  PMID: 34056281

Abstract

graphic file with name ao1c00106_0008.jpg

Formation of formic acid from renewable biomass resources is of great interest since formic acid is a widely used platform chemical and has recently been regarded as an important liquid hydrogen carrier. Herein, a novel approach is reported for the conversion of glucose, the constituent carbohydrate from the cellulose fraction of biomass, to formic acid under mild hydrothermal conditions with simultaneous reduction of Ag2O to Ag. Results showed that glucose was selectively converted to formic acid with an optimum yield of 40.7% and glycolic acid with a yield of 6.1% with 53.2% glucose converting to carbon dioxide (CO2) immediately at a mild reaction temperature of 135 °C for 30 min. In addition, Ag2O was used as a solid oxidant for glucose oxidation, which avoids the use of traditionally dangerous liquid oxidant H2O2. Furthermore, complete conversion of Ag2O to Ag can be achieved. This study not only developed a new method for value-added chemical production from renewable biomass but also explored an alternative low-carbon and energy-saving route for silver extraction and recovery.

1. Introduction

Formic acid (FA) is an important chemical that is widely used in chemical, textile, leather, pharmaceutical, rubber, and other industries.1,2 Currently, FA is considered as one of the promising hydrogen storage materials due to a number of inherent advantages. Because of its low toxicity, high hydrogen storage capacity, and availability from renewable resources, FA has recently attracted significant attention for its potential applications as a chemical hydrogen storage medium.3−9 Some promising methods were reported for the conversion of renewable biomass or carbon dioxide (CO2) into FA, such as acid hydrolysis of biomass, wet oxidation of biomass, catalytic oxidation of biomass, homogeneous or heterogeneous catalysis of CO2, hydrothermal conversion of CO2, and photo/electrochemical reduction of CO2.10−15 Particularly, the hydrothermal reaction is often used for biomass conversion since high-temperature water has unique properties as a reaction medium such as low dielectric constant, few and weak hydrogen bonds, and high isothermal compressibility.16−23 Jin’s group first presented the hydrothermal conversion of carbohydrates into FA with a H2O2 oxidant at 250 °C in 60 s. In the absence of alkali, the highest yield of FA was about 24%, while it could achieve 75% with the alkali in the reaction.16 Wasserschied’s group reported that a total FA yield of 60% could be achieved from glucose catalyzed by H8PV5Mo7O40 within an 8 h reaction time at 90 °C and a 30 bar O2 atmosphere.24 Albert’s group continued to study the switchable catalytic system of glucose into FA and lactic acid (LA). Under the reaction in parallel at 160 °C within 1 h using a H6PV3Mo9O40 catalyst, 42% yield of FA could be achieved under the O2 atmosphere and 40% yield of LA was obtained under the N2 atmosphere.25 Moreover, Moret’s group has demonstrated the production of FA from direct reduction of CO2 gas by H2 using a homogeneous [RuCl2(PTA)4] complex in an acidic aqueous solution.26 Jin’s group also reported the hydrothermal reduction of CO2 into FA using metallic manganese,27 H2S,28 and microalgae,29 respectively. However, in reported conversion routes of biomass into FA, H2O2 or O2 was generally used as an oxidant and thus led to high energy costs due to the compressing gas or potential insecurity hazards.30 On the other hand, the poor selectivity of FA, high reaction temperature, and expensive and tedious preparations of noble-metal catalysts make these methods inappropriate for the synthesis of FA.31 For example, CuO was used in biomass conversion as a solid oxidant but only acetic acid was acquirable.32

Recently, the cost of silver production increases rapidly with decreasing natural silver resources, but silver has a huge demand for photographs, radiographs, electronics, photonics, catalysts, jewelry, silverware, dental materials, medicines, and disinfectants in wastewater treatment.33,34 Therefore, the market demand urgently requires the recovery of silver from silver-containing wastes through new cost-effective and environmentally friendly technologies.35 Many researchers studied the methods to recycle silver by chemical reduction, chemical replacement, and ion exchange.36−38 However, these methods were short of economy and environmental friendliness due to the use of expensive resins or high energy input. Herein, we propose a new method for selective conversion of glucose into FA with easily separated byproduct glycolic acid using Ag2O as a solid oxidant and simultaneous transformation of Ag2O into Ag under mild hydrothermal conditions. The results show that glucose was selectively converted into FA with an optimum yield of 40.7% and glycolic acid yield of 6.1% with 53.2% glucose converting to CO2 immediately at a mild reaction temperature of 135 °C for 30 min. The proposed method is not only a promising way for the conversion of biomass into value-added chemicals but also an effective and green route for silver extraction.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characteristics of Ag2O/Ag with Hydrothermal Conversion of Glucose to Formic Acid

A series of experiments with glucose and Ag2O as reactants were carried out under mild hydrothermal conditions to investigate whether glucose could be selectively converted to FA. As shown in Figure 1, only lactic acid was detected from the liquid sample by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis when glucose was reacted without Ag2O under the basic hydrothermal condition. However, when Ag2O was added, the production of FA was clearly increased and the formation of glycolic acid was also detected. The previous study has revealed that a relatively high yield of lactic acid can be obtained from the hydrothermal conversion of glucose under alkaline conditions.12 Notably, as shown in Figure 1, the amount of lactic acid in the presence of Ag2O was much less than that without Ag2O, which suggested that glucose was selectively converted into FA by reacting with Ag2O under mild hydrothermal conditions.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

HPLC chromatography of liquid samples after reactions (a) with and (b) without 10 mmol Ag2O (1 mmol glucose, 1 mol/L NaOH with 6.25 mL, 180 °C, 2 h).

To investigate the reduction of Ag2O, solid samples were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) methods. Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of the Ag2O before the reaction and solid products after the reaction. No Ag peak appeared in the solid sample before reaction (Figure 2a). However, four diffraction peaks were observed at 38.20, 44.40, 64.60, and 77.60°, respectively, which were indexed as the (111), (200), (220), and (311) orientations of cubic Ag (Figure 2b). These results indicated that Ag2O was converted into Ag after the reaction. Furthermore, the SEM image shows that the obtained Ag particle has a diameter of 0.1–0.3 μm (Figure 3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

XRD patterns of (a) Ag2O before the reaction and (b) solid products after the reaction at 135 °C for 2 h (1 mmol glucose, 4 mmol Ag2O, 1 mol/L NaOH).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

SEM image of silver obtained after the reaction (4 mmol Ag2O, 1 mmol glucose, 135 °C, 2 h, 1 mol/L NaOH with 6.25 mL).

2.2. Investigating the Influences of Reaction Conditions on Yields of Formic Acid

Next, the relationship between reaction conditions and yields of FA from glucose was further investigated. Above all, the influence of reaction temperature was examined by varying the temperature from 105 to 210 °C. As shown in Figure 4a, FA was identified as the major product. When the temperature was increased from 105 to 135 °C, the yield of FA increased from 22.9 to 29.1%. However, a further increase of the temperature led to a slight decrease in the FA yield. For the production of glycolic acid, a similar trend was observed. However, when the temperature was increased to 210 °C, lactic acid was detected at the cost of the yields of glycolic acid and FA. The change in the product yield and selectivity suggested that the temperature could affect the cleavage patterns of glucose and alter the reaction pathway. Furthermore, there was no glucose detected in the liquid phase after the reaction at all tested temperatures, which showed that glucose was completely decomposed. Figure 4b shows the influence of reaction time on yields of different products and conversion of glucose in the hydrothermal oxidation of glucose to FA. In the first 30 min, the yield of FA dramatically increased to 29.7%; however, a slow decrease in the FA yield was observed when the reaction time prolonged to 240 min. Similar trends were observed for the glycolic acid yield. The decrease in the yields of FA and glycolic acid with a long reaction time is probably caused by the decomposition of the formed products under hydrothermal conditions.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Effect of (a) reaction temperature (7 mmol Ag2O, 1 mol/L NaOH with 6.25 mL, 120 min), (b) reaction time (7 mmol Ag2O, 1 mol/L NaOH with 6.25 mL, 135 °C), (c) NaOH concentration (7 mmol Ag2O, 135 °C, 30 min, 6.25 mL NaOH solution), and (d) amount of Ag2O (0.75 mol/L NaOH 6.25 mL, 135 °C, 30 min) on yields of different products and conversion of glucose in hydrothermal oxidation of glucose to formic acid (1 mmol glucose was used for all cases).

The influence of the concentration of NaOH on the oxidation of glucose was also investigated. A sharp increase in glucose conversion was noted from 57.4% to 100% when NaOH concentration increased from 0 to 1 M (Figure 4c). This is probably because the NaOH solution with higher concentration accelerated glucose conversion, which has been studied in detail in previous research.18 The yield of FA was less than 2% in the absence of NaOH. However, FA yield ascended simultaneously with increasing NaOH concentration and reached 34% at 0.75 M NaOH. The previous research has demonstrated that a certain amount of alkali could convert the FA to formate, which is more stable than FA under hydrothermal conditions.39 Thus, the addition of alkali could prevent the produced FA from being decomposed that resulted in a higher yield. However, further increasing the NaOH concentration exceeding 0.75 M got a decrease in the FA yield, which is probably because the reaction pathway of glucose conversion was negatively affected by additional NaOH.

The effect of the Ag2O amount was examined (Figure 4d). The yield of FA first quickly increased from 1.1 to 33.1% when the Ag2O addition increased from 0 to 116.7% relative to glucose. At the same time, a glycolic acid yield of 15% was gained. While then FA yield slowly ascended to 40.7% when the Ag2O supply was further increased to 266.7%, the glycolic acid yield was descended to 6.1%. In addition, lactic acid with a yield of 44.0% without any formation of FA was observed in the absence of the oxidant. This result was similar to other literature studies, in which glucose was dominantly isomerized into fructose and then cleaved into lactic acid via retro-aldol condensation under alkaline conditions.18,30 The above results indicated that the Ag2O oxidant was advantageous for the oxidation of glucose to FA, and increasing the amount of Ag2O had a positive effect on the FA yield.

All products were calculated by mass balance, and the results for the sample before and after the reaction are shown in Table 1. It is clear that all Ag2O and glucose were completely converted, while there is no undesired product in this reaction and 53.2% glucose was oxidized to CO2.

Table 1. Mass Balance and Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Content of the Sample before (S1) and after (S2) the Reactiona.

entry Ag/Ag2O (g) TOC (mg) glucose (mg) formic acid (mg) lactic acid (mg) CO2 (mg)
S1 0/0.324 14.40 36 0 0 0
S2 0.301/0 6.74 0 22.08 6.21 27.15
Open in a new tab
a

S2 was separated by filtration.

2.3. Investigating the Oxidation Pathways of Glucose to Formic Acid

Oxidation pathways of glucose to FA were then investigated. Based on the previous research, glucose was probably first oxidized to gluconic acid under basic hydrothermal conditions, which was further converted to FA through a series of reactions.18 Thus, gluconic acid was first chosen as the starting material instead of glucose for hydrothermal FA production. Results revealed that gluconic acid was completely converted with a FA yield of 34.4% (Table 2, Entry 1), which is close to that obtained from glucose directly. This result indicates that gluconic acid was a crucial intermediate for FA generation. Other organic acids, such as oxalic acid, glycolic acid, acetic acid, and lactic acid, could be hardly converted under such hydrothermal conditions (Table 2, Entries 2–5), which inferred that these organic acids were unlikely the intermediates for FA production. Meanwhile, methanol and sorbitol were completely converted but without any production of FA (Table 2, Entries 6 and 7), which suggested that these alcohols were unlikely the intermediates for FA production, although they were more reactive than organic acids under hydrothermal conditions.

Table 2. Oxidation of Different Model Compounds with Ag2O under Hydrothermal Conditionsa.

2.3.

Open in a new tab
a

Reaction conditions: 0.5 mmol substrate, 0.75 mol/L NaOH, 100% Ag2O, 135 °C, 30 min.

Aldehyde/ketone species such as glycolaldehyde, pyruvaldehyde, glyceraldehyde, and 1,3-dihydroxyacetone displayed high reaction activity under hydrothermal conditions, and they all had 100% conversion (Table 2, Entries 8–11). Glycolaldehyde afforded FA and glycolic acid as the major products with yields of 24.1 and 16.5%, respectively, which indicated that glycolaldehyde was likely an intermediate for FA generation. FA yields obtained with pyruvaldehyde and glyceraldehyde were 3.2 and 1.1%, respectively. Especially, the major products of pyruvaldehyde were lactic acid and acetic acid with yields of 53.6 and 21.4%, respectively. Hence, these two aldehydes were unlikely the key intermediates for FA production. When 1,3-dihydroxyacetone was engaged as the substrate, glycolic acid was identified as the major product with FA, lactic acid, and acetic acid as side products. Thus, 1,3-dihydroxyacetone was unlikely the key intermediates for FA production. Furthermore, xylose was tested and displayed high activity to produce FA (Table 2, Entry 12), which indicated that xylose might be a key intermediate for FA production.

Based on the tested results, Scheme 1 shows the proposed reaction pathway for glucose conversion into FA with the oxidation of Ag2O under mild hydrothermal conditions. Glucose first transforms into its open-chain form and the aldehyde group is oxidized by Ag2O and then gives the gluconic acid. Subsequently, FA and xylose are formed by the breakage of the C1–C2 bond of gluconic acid. Finally, xylose transforms into formaldehyde and glycolaldehyde, which are further oxidized into FA and glycolic acid, respectively.

Scheme 1. Proposed Reaction Pathway of the Oxidation of Glucose into Formic Acid.

Scheme 1

Open in a new tab

3. Conclusions

We developed a new method of one-step conversion of glucose into FA with simultaneous reduction of Ag2O to Ag under mild hydrothermal conditions. At optimum reaction conditions, a 40.7% yield of FA, 6.1% yield of glycolic acid from glucose, and 100% conversion of Ag2O to Ag were obtained. This study not only developed a new way for value-added chemical production from renewable biomass resources but also proposed an alternative low-carbon and energy-saving route for silver extraction and recovery.

4. Material and Methods

4.1. Materials

In this research, glucose (99.9%), formic acid (98%), glycolic acid (98%), methanol (99.5%), and xylose (99.9%) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Sodium hydroxide (96%), acetic acid (99.5%), and lactic acid (85%) were obtained from Shanghai Lingfeng Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Gluconic acid (49–53 wt % in water) was purchased from Sun Chemical Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Sorbitol (98%) was purchased from Innochem (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd. Glycolaldehyde dimer was offered by Aladdin Reagent Company. Sodium oxalate (99.8%) and pyruvaldehyde (40% w/w aq. solution) were purchased from Shanghai Titan Scientific Co., Ltd. Glyceraldehyde (85%) was obtained from Bide Pharmatech Ltd. 1,3-Dihydroxyacetone (98%) was provided by J&K Scientific Ltd. Ag2O (99.7%, Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd.) was chosen as the model compound of Ag(I) in the basic solution because Ag(I) ion could form AgOH and then generate Ag2O at a high pH (pH > 11). The stoichiometric demand for complete oxidation of glucose to FA was defined as a 100% Ag2O supply according to eq 1.

4.1. 1

4.2. Conversion of Glucose

The conversion of glucose was conducted in a Teflon-lined stainless steel batch reactor with an inner volume of 25 mL. In a typical procedure, the desired amounts of glucose and Ag2O and 6.25 mL of NaOH solution were first loaded into the reactor. Then, the reactor was sealed and put into an isothermal oven preheated to 135 °C for 30 min. After the desired reaction time, the reactor was taken out from the oven and cooled to room temperature.

4.3. Analytical Methods

After the reaction, liquid samples were filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane filter and analyzed by an Agilent 1200 high-performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC), which was equipped with two KC-811 columns, a differential refractometer detector, and a tunable ultraviolet/visible absorbance detector. A 2 mmol/L HClO4 aqueous solution with a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min was used as the mobile phase of HPLC. Solid samples were washed with deionized water and then dried in a vacuum oven at 40 °C for 6 h. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the solid samples were collected by a Shimadzu 6100 X-ray diffractometer equipped with Cu Kα radiation at a scan rate of 2°/min wit 2θ ranging from 10 to 80°. Total organic carbon (TOC) residuals of samples were measured by an Analytik Jena AG multi 3100 Liquid TOC instrument.

The conversion X and yield Y of products were defined based on the following equations

4.3.
4.3.

Acknowledgments

J.X. was supported by the Shanghai Post-doctoral Excellence Program of Shanghai Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau.

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Lu T.; Hou Y.; Wu W.; Niu M.; Wang Y. Formic acid and acetic acid production from corn cob by catalytic oxidation using O2. Fuel Process. Technol. 2018, 171, 133–139. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.11.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Preuster P.; Albert J. Biogenic Formic Acid as a Green Hydrogen Carrier. Energy Technol. 2018, 6, 501–509. 10.1002/ente.201700572. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang J.; Sun M.; Liu X.; Han Y. Catalytic oxidative conversion of cellulosic biomass to formic acid and acetic acid with exceptionally high yields. Catal. Today 2014, 233, 77–82. 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.12.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Zell T.; Butschke B.; Ben-David Y.; Milstein D. Efficient Hydrogen Liberation from Formic Acid Catalyzed by a Well-Defined Iron Pincer Complex under Mild Conditions. Chem. - Eur. J. 2013, 19, 8068–8072. 10.1002/chem.201301383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang Z. L.; Yan J. M.; Ping Y.; Wang H. L.; Zheng W. T.; Jiang Q. An efficient CoAuPd/C catalyst for hydrogen generation from formic acid at room temperature. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4406–9. 10.1002/anie.201301009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eppinger J.; Huang K.-W. Formic Acid as a Hydrogen Energy Carrier. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 188–195. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00574. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu X.; Li S.; Liu Y.; Cao Y. Formic acid: A versatile renewable reagent for green and sustainable chemical synthesis. Chin. J. Catal. 2015, 36, 1461–1475. 10.1016/S1872-2067(15)60861-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Valentini F.; Kozell V.; Petrucci C.; Marrocchi A.; Gu Y.; Gelman D.; Vaccaro L. Formic acid, a biomass-derived source of energy and hydrogen for biomass upgrading. Energ Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 2646–2664. 10.1039/C9EE01747J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhao B.; Hu Y.; Gao J.; Zhao G.; Ray M. B.; Xu C. C. Recent Advances in Hydroliquefaction of Biomass for Bio-oil Production Using In Situ Hydrogen Donors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 16987–17007. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c01649. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cantero D. A.; Vaquerizo L.; Martinez C.; Bermejo M. D.; Cocero M. J. Selective transformation of fructose and high fructose content biomass into lactic acid in supercritical water. Catal. Today 2015, 255, 80–86. 10.1016/j.cattod.2014.11.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cao X.; Peng X.; Sun S.; Zhong L.; Chen W.; Wang S.; Sun R.-C. Hydrothermal conversion of xylose, glucose, and cellulose under the catalysis of transition metal sulfates. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 118, 44–51. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Choudhary H.; Nishimura S.; Ebitani K. Synthesis of high-value organic acids from sugars promoted by hydrothermally loaded Cu oxide species on magnesia. Appl. Catal., B 2015, 162, 1–10. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.05.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hrnčič M. K.; Kravanja G.; Knez Ž. Hydrothermal treatment of biomass for energy and chemicals. Energy 2016, 116, 1312–1322. 10.1016/j.energy.2016.06.148. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Voß D.; Pickel H.; Albert J. Improving the Fractionated Catalytic Oxidation of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Formic Acid and Cellulose by Using Design of Experiments. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 9754–9762. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huber G. W.; Lapkin A.; Yan N. Introduction to green chemistry and reaction engineering. React. Chem. Eng. 2020, 5, 2131–2133. 10.1039/D0RE90041A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jin F.; Yun J.; Li G.; Kishita A.; Tohji K.; Enomoto H. Hydrothermal conversion of carbohydrate biomass into formic acid at mild temperatures. Green Chem. 2008, 10, 612–615. 10.1039/B802076K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Savage P. E. A perspective on catalysis in sub- and supercritical water. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2009, 47, 407–414. 10.1016/j.supflu.2008.09.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jin F.; Enomoto H. Rapid and highly selective conversion of biomass into value-added products in hydrothermal conditions: chemistry of acid/base-catalysed and oxidation reactions. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 382–397. 10.1039/C004268D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jin F.; Gao Y.; Jin Y.; Zhang Y.; Cao J.; Wei Z.; Smith R. L. Jr High-yield reduction of carbon dioxide into formic acid by zero-valent metal/metal oxide redox cycles. Energ Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 881–884. 10.1039/C0EE00661K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhong H.; Wang L.; Yang Y.; He R.; Jing Z.; Jin F. Ni and Zn/ZnO Synergistically Catalyzed Reduction of Bicarbonate into Formate with Water Splitting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 42149–42155. 10.1021/acsami.9b14039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Müller N.; Romero R.; Grandón H.; Segura C. Selective Production of Formic Acid by Wet Oxidation of Aqueous-Phase Bio-oil. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 10417–10424. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01345. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Koley S.; Khadase M. S.; Mathimani T.; Raheman H.; Mallick N. Catalytic and non-catalytic hydrothermal processing of Scenedesmus obliquus biomass for bio-crude production – A sustainable energy perspective. Energy Convers. Manage. 2018, 163, 111–121. 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ong H. C.; Chen W.-H.; Farooq A.; Gan Y. Y.; Lee K. T.; Ashokkumar V. Catalytic thermochemical conversion of biomass for biofuel production: A comprehensive review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2019, 113, 109266 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Albert J.; Lueders D.; Boesmann A.; Guldi D. M.; Wasserscheid P. Spectroscopic and electrochemical characterization of heteropoly acids for their optimized application in selective biomass oxidation to formic acid. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 226–237. 10.1039/C3GC41320A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Voß D.; Dietrich R.; Stuckart M.; Albert J. Switchable Catalytic Polyoxometalate-Based Systems for Biomass Conversion to Carboxylic Acids. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 19082–19091. 10.1021/acsomega.0c02430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Moret S.; Dyson P. J.; Laurenczy G. Direct synthesis of formic acid from carbon dioxide by hydrogenation in acidic media. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4017 10.1038/ncomms5017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lyu L.; Zeng X.; Yun J.; Wei F.; Jin F. No catalyst addition and highly efficient dissociation of H2O for the reduction of CO2 to formic acid with Mn. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 6003–6009. 10.1021/es405210d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. He R.; Hu B.; Zhong H.; Jin F.; Fan J.; Hu Y. H.; Jing Z. Reduction of CO2 with H2S in a simulated deep-sea hydrothermal vent system. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 1056–1059. 10.1039/C8CC08075E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yang Y.; Zhong H.; He R.; Wang X.; Cheng J.; Yao G.; Jin F. Synergetic conversion of microalgae and CO2 into value-added chemicals under hydrothermal conditions. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 1247–1252. 10.1039/C8GC03645D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jin F.; Zeng X.; Jing Z.; Enomoto H. A Potentially Useful Technology by Mimicking Nature—Rapid Conversion of Biomass and CO2 into Chemicals and Fuels under Hydrothermal Conditions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 9921–9937. 10.1021/ie202721q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Syed S. Silver recovery aqueous techniques from diverse sources: Hydrometallurgy in recycling. Waste Manage. 2016, 50, 234–256. 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yin G.; Huo Z.; Zeng X.; Yao G.; Jing Z.; Jin F. Reduction of CuO into Cu with Guaiacol as a Model Compound of Lignin with a Homogeneous Catalyst of NaOH. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 7856–7865. 10.1021/ie5007239. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gromov O. G.; Kuz’min A. P.; Kunshina G. B.; Lokshin E. P.; Kalinnikov V. T. Electrochemical Recovery of Silver from Secondary Raw Materials. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2004, 77, 62–66. 10.1023/B:RJAC.0000024577.90857.07. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Anu Iswarya J.; Rajeshkumar S.; Ezhilarasan D. Applications Of Silver Nanoparticles In Dentistry. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 11, 1126–1131. 10.26452/ijrps.v11iSPL3.3352. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tao H.-C.; Gao Z.-Y.; Ding H.; Xu N.; Wu W.-M. Recovery of silver from silver(I)-containing solutions in bioelectrochemical reactors. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 111, 92–97. 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang Y.; Zhan L.; Xu Z. Recycling Ag, As, Ga of waste light-emitting diodes via subcritical water treatment. eJ. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 408, 124409 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mohd Suah F. B.; Teh B. P.; Mansor N.; Hamzah H. H.; Mohamed N. A closed-loop electrogenerative recycling process for recovery of silver from a diluted cyanide solution. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 31753–31757. 10.1039/C9RA05557F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang Z.; Halli P.; Hannula P.; Liu F.; Wilson B. P.; Yliniemi K.; Lundström M. Recovery of Silver from Dilute Effluents via Electrodeposition and Redox Replacement. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, E266–E274. 10.1149/2.0031910jes. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yan L.; Qi X. Degradation of Cellulose to Organic Acids in its Homogeneous Alkaline Aqueous Solution. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 897–901. 10.1021/sc400507s. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES