Skip to main content
PLOS Medicine logoLink to PLOS Medicine
. 2021 May 26;18(5):e1003567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003567

Positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in experimental human malaria to identify organ-specific changes in morphology and glucose metabolism: A prospective cohort study

John Woodford 1,2,*, Ashley Gillman 3, Peter Jenvey 4, Jennie Roberts 4, Stephen Woolley 1,5, Bridget E Barber 1,6, Melissa Fernandez 1, Stephen Rose 3, Paul Thomas 7, Nicholas M Anstey 6, James S McCarthy 1,2
Editor: Lorenz von Seidlein8
PMCID: PMC8154100  PMID: 34038421

Abstract

Background

Plasmodium vivax has been proposed to infect and replicate in the human spleen and bone marrow. Compared to Plasmodium falciparum, which is known to undergo microvascular tissue sequestration, little is known about the behavior of P. vivax outside of the circulating compartment. This may be due in part to difficulties in studying parasite location and activity in life.

Methods and findings

To identify organ-specific changes during the early stages of P. vivax infection, we performed 18-F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) at baseline and just prior to onset of clinical illness in P. vivax experimentally induced blood-stage malaria (IBSM) and compared findings to P. falciparum IBSM. Seven healthy, malaria-naive participants were enrolled from 3 IBSM trials: NCT02867059, ACTRN12616000174482, and ACTRN12619001085167. Imaging took place between 2016 and 2019 at the Herston Imaging Research Facility, Australia. Postinoculation imaging was performed after a median of 9 days in both species (n = 3 P. vivax; n = 4 P. falciparum). All participants were aged between 19 and 23 years, and 6/7 were male. Splenic volume (P. vivax: +28.8% [confidence interval (CI) +10.3% to +57.3%], P. falciparum: +22.9 [CI −15.3% to +61.1%]) and radiotracer uptake (P. vivax: +15.5% [CI −0.7% to +31.7%], P. falciparum: +5.5% [CI +1.4% to +9.6%]) increased following infection with each species, but more so in P. vivax infection (volume: p = 0.72, radiotracer uptake: p = 0.036). There was no change in FDG uptake in the bone marrow (P. vivax: +4.6% [CI −15.9% to +25.0%], P. falciparum: +3.2% [CI −3.2% to +9.6%]) or liver (P. vivax: +6.2% [CI −8.7% to +21.1%], P. falciparum: −1.4% [CI −4.6% to +1.8%]) following infection with either species. In participants with P. vivax, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet count decreased from baseline at the time of postinoculation imaging. Decrements in hemoglobin and hematocrit were significantly greater in participants with P. vivax infection compared to P. falciparum. The main limitations of this study are the small sample size and the inability of this tracer to differentiate between host and parasite metabolic activity.

Conclusions

PET/MRI indicated greater splenic tropism and metabolic activity in early P. vivax infection compared to P. falciparum, supporting the hypothesis of splenic accumulation of P. vivax very early in infection. The absence of uptake in the bone marrow and liver suggests that, at least in early infection, these tissues do not harbor a large parasite biomass or do not provoke a prominent metabolic response. PET/MRI is a safe and noninvasive method to evaluate infection-associated organ changes in morphology and glucose metabolism.


John Woodford and co-authors use positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) to describe unique splenic morphology and metabolism in early P. vivax infection.

Author summary

Why was this study done?

  • In contrast to Plasmodium falciparum, blood-stage Plasmodium vivax is not traditionally thought to accumulate outside of the circulating blood compartment.

  • Emerging data suggest that a hidden compartment of P. vivax may exist outside of circulation, in reticulocyte (very young red blood cells)-containing organs.

  • The presence of a hidden compartment affects our understanding of the basic biology and pathology of this common parasite and may have implications when developing antimalarial treatments.

  • Studying the accumulation of malaria parasites is extremely challenging in vivo and has historically been limited to late stage disease and postmortem studies.

What did the researchers do and find?

  • We performed whole body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) in individuals undergoing experimental malaria infection to identify changes in organ morphology and glucose metabolism following infection.

  • Splenic uptake of radiolabeled glucose increased following P. vivax and P. falciparum infection and was more pronounced in the P. vivax group.

  • Glucose uptake in the liver and bone marrow was not increased following infection with either P. vivax or P. falciparum.

What do these findings mean?

  • Increased splenic glucose metabolism is present in the early stages of infection with both P. vivax and P. falciparum and is more pronounced in P. vivax, consistent with other emerging evidence of a greater predilection for the spleen in P. vivax than P. falciparum.

  • Functional medical imaging may be a useful tool to study biological processes in experimental malaria infection.

Introduction

Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum have key differences in their biology, pathophysiology, and disease manifestations. These are thought to largely arise from differences in microvascular parasite sequestration [13] and host red blood cell tropism, with P. vivax having a strict tropism for immature reticulocytes [4,5]. Differences in organ-specific parasite tropism have also been proposed [3]. Although P. vivax is not thought to undergo significant microvascular tissue sequestration, there is emerging evidence that the spleen may harbor a large hidden reservoir of replicating parasites [6,7]. The evaluation of sequestration and organ-specific parasite tropism has largely relied on biochemical markers, nonhuman primate models, and postmortem studies, which have been critical to progress our understanding of disease pathophysiology but are imperfect tools to study the dynamics of infection in humans.

The tissue distribution of P. falciparum on autopsy has been well described. In a seminal publication by Marchiafava and Bignami, the greatest concentration of schizonts was found in the brain, followed by the lungs, spleen, bone marrow, liver, and intestines [1]. Although human autopsy studies of P. vivax are comparatively rare, parasite material has been identified in the spleen, liver, and lungs, but not the brain [8]. Studies of P. vivax tropism in nonhuman primates have been limited by the need for prior splenectomy [9]. In these studies, few or no parasites were identified in the brain or intestines, whereas the bone marrow and liver sinusoids were major tissue reservoirs for P. vivax schizonts and gametocytes [9]. An apparent predilection for the spleen, bone marrow, and liver is consistent with biomarker evidence of a hidden biomass of parasite accumulating in non-endothelial lined spaces [10] and the strict reticulocyte tropism of this species, which may promote concentration in organs in which immature reticulocytes accumulate [4,11]. Nonetheless, this hypothesis is challenging to confirm in life, where these processes are largely inaccessible to evaluation. In this context, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional imaging using nuclear medicine such as positron emission tomography (PET) may be useful noninvasive methods to study deep tissue processes and organ-specific tropism, particularly in early and non-severe infection.

As access to clinical imaging infrastructure in malaria endemic areas continues to improve, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated the utility of MRI to evaluate the brain in cerebral [12] and uncomplicated falciparum malaria [13,14]. In contrast, PET imaging in malaria is limited to a small number of nonhuman primate studies [15,16] and a single case report of serendipitous imaging in suspected lymphoma [17]. In the nonhuman primate studies, uptake of the glucose biomimetic 18-F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) was colocated with sequestered infected red blood cells (iRBCs) as ascertained on subsequent autopsy [16], suggesting that PET imaging using this widely available radiotracer that targets glucose utilization may be a useful modality to localize organ-specific parasite accumulation and host response in life.

We sought to investigate organ-specific changes in morphology and glucose metabolism in the spleen, vertebral bone marrow, and liver in early P. vivax and P. falciparum infection using FDG PET/MRI imaging of participants with experimentally induced blood-stage malaria (IBSM). We hypothesized that alterations in glucose metabolism would be present in the regions of interest (ROIs). Secondly, we hypothesized that the patterns of PET/MRI would differ between participants with P. vivax and P. falciparum infection.

Methods

This was a prospective, single-center exploratory study performed between 2016 and 2019 at the Herston Imaging Research Facility, Brisbane, Australia. Participants were recruited to the imaging study after enrolling in IBSM studies. In brief, baseline FDG PET/MRI was performed prior to malaria inoculation. Healthy, malaria-naive participants were then inoculated with approximately 564 viable P. vivax or approximately 2,800 P. falciparum (3D7) infected erythrocytes. Peripheral blood parasitemia was monitored at least daily by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) from day 4 after inoculation as described previously [18]. A postinoculation FDG PET/MRI was performed near to the peak of parasitemia, in the 24 hours prior to administration of antimalarial treatment. Standard safety assessments including clinical review, hematology, and biochemistry parameters were performed at specified times during the IBSM studies including baseline, 1 day following postinoculation imaging (at time of treatment), and in convalescence, 1 to 2 weeks after postinoculation imaging [19,20]. A total of 8 participants were planned for enrollment, based on the availability of funding, IBSM study cohorts, and imaging facilities.

Imaging procedures

Baseline and postinoculation FDG PET/MRI were performed on all participants using the 3 Tesla Magnetom Biograph mMR (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). All participants completed an institutional MRI safety checklist prior to imaging. The female participants underwent qualitative human chorionic gonadotropin testing prior to imaging to exclude pregnancy. Participants were required have a normal fasting glucose at enrolment and to abstain from strenuous exercise and follow a low-carbohydrate diet in the 24 hours prior to imaging with a 6-hour fasting period immediately prior to help standardize FDG uptake [21,22]. Diet and activity information sheets were provided to assist participant adherence. Due to the different growth rate of parasites in IBSM, the interval between baseline and postinoculation imaging differed in the P. vivax and P. falciparum studies.

Nuclear medicine and radiology specialists reporting all imaging were not aware of the inoculum species. Mean standardized uptake values (SUVs) were estimated for the prespecified ROIs including the spleen, vertebral bone marrow, and liver. SUV is the most commonly used measurement of radiotracer activity and represents the ratio of tissue radioactivity related to FDG at a given time and the injected dose of radioactivity per kilogram of participant weight. Organ volumes were calculated for the spleen and liver. As an exploratory analysis, the quantitative rate of irreversible radiotracer uptake was modeled for the ROIs. Detailed methods and imaging protocols are outlined in the S1 Text.

Statistical analysis

All imaging results are presented descriptively for the P. vivax and P. falciparum groups. Where relevant, results for each inoculum group are presented as mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) percentage change from baseline for quantitative imaging metrics. A >10% percentage difference in SUV from baseline to postinoculation imaging was considered meaningful based on intraindividual, inter-scan variability reported in stringent FDG PET imaging trials in malignancy and non-malignancy settings [2325]. Parasitemia at the time of postinoculation imaging was estimated by interpolating the linear rate of change between the nearest log-transformed study parasitemia measurements.

Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 8.4.2 (GraphPad, San Diego, United States of America). In an exploratory analysis, baseline and postinoculation imaging metrics and selected hematology and biochemistry parameters were compared using paired, 2-tailed t tests. Differences between the mean percentage change from baseline for quantitative imaging metrics for P. vivax and P. falciparum groups were compared using unpaired t tests. Differences between selected hematology and biochemistry parameters and parasitemia measurements for P. vivax and P. falciparum groups were compared using unpaired t tests of Mann–Whitney U tests. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. No adjustments have been made for multiple comparisons.

Study approval

Participants were recruited from 3 IBSM studies: 2 published (P. falciparum: NCT02867059 [26] and P. vivax: ACTRN12616000174482 [27]) and 1 unpublished (P. falciparum: ACTRN12619001085167). These studies were approved by the QIMR-Berghofer Medical Research Institute Ethics Committee. The exploratory imaging study was approved by the QIMR-Berghofer Medical Research Institute and Queensland Health Metro North Ethics committees. The exploratory imaging study was prospectively linked to 2 of the IBSM studies (ACTRN12616001458426 linked to IBSM study NCT02867059 and ACTRN12616001238460 linked to IBSM study ACTRN12616000174482 (see S1 Protocol)). The third IBSM study incorporated the exploratory imaging study into the main protocol (ACTRN12619001085167). All participants provided written informed consent for the IBSM studies and the exploratory imaging study. This study has been reported as per the Strengthening The Reporting of OBservational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines (S1 Checklist).

Results

A total of 8 healthy, malaria-naive participants were recruited. All participants underwent baseline imaging within 7 days before inoculation. One participant was enrolled and underwent baseline imaging, but was excluded from the IBSM study before inoculation due to incidental hypokalemia on baseline biochemistry. This participant did not undergo postinoculation imaging and was excluded from the analysis. Seven participants underwent postinoculation imaging. The study population is described in Table 1. Included participants had a median age of 20 years (range 19 to 23), and 6/7 were male. Three were inoculated with P. vivax and 4 with P. falciparum. All participants developed a measurable parasitemia (Fig 1) and reported symptoms of early malaria infection prior to treatment. Parasitemia at postinoculation imaging was at least as high in the P. falciparum group (median 22,326 [range 998 to 99,134 parasites/mL]) as the P. vivax group (median 6,042 [range 5,818 to 29,097 parasites/mL, Mann–Whitney U test p > 0.99]). Although the day of treatment varied between studies, both groups underwent imaging a median 9 days following inoculation. Imaging results for the ROIs including organ volumes and SUVs are presented in Fig 2 and S1 Table. Exploratory calculation of the quantitative rate of radiotracer uptake for the ROIs is presented in the S1 Table and S2 Text.

Table 1. Study population information.

Participant Age (years) Sex BMI Trial Challenge agent Dose (viable p/mL) Day of postinoculation imaging Parasitemia at imaging (p/mL)
1 20 F 29.5 Collins et al. (2020) [27] Pv 564 9 29,097
2 23 M 22.9 Collins et al. (2020) [27] Pv 564 9 5,818
3 20 M 22.0 Collins et al. (2020) [27] Pv 564 9 6,042
4 19 M 28.5 Gaur et al. (2020) [26] Pf 2,800 7 1,427
5 22 M 22.0 Gaur et al. (2020) [26] Pf 2,800 7 998
6 19 M 19.7 ACTRN12619001085167 Pf 2,800 11 43,224
7 19 M 24.2 ACTRN12619001085167 Pf 2,800 10 99,134

BMI, body mass index; Pf, P. falciparum; Pv, P. vivax.

Parasitemia at imaging: estimated by interpolating the linear rate of change between the closest log-transformed parasitemia measurements.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Parasitemia curves for participants inoculated with (A) P. vivax and (B) P. falciparum.

Fig 2. Imaging indices at baseline and postinoculation.

Fig 2

(A) Spleen (volume), (B) Liver (volume), (C) Spleen (SUV), (D) Liver (SUV), and (E) Vertebral Bone Marrow (SUV). P. vivax group represented by black lines with unfilled markers. P. falciparum group represented by gray lines with filled markers. Asterisk represents p < 0.05 in paired t test comparison with baseline measurements (black for P. vivax, gray for P. falciparum). SUV, standardized uptake value.

Splenic imaging

In the P. vivax group, splenic SUVs increased +15.5% from baseline (CI −0.7% to +31.7%). SUVs on postinoculation imaging were significantly higher on postinoculation imaging compared to baseline imaging (paired t test p = 0.044). This was visible on qualitative review in some participants (Fig 3). Splenic volume increased a mean +28.8% from baseline imaging but did not reach statistical significance (CI +0.3% to +57.3%, paired t test p = 0.053).

Fig 3. Baseline and postinoculation PET imaging in Participant 1 (P. vivax group).

Fig 3

Increased radiotracer uptake is evident in the spleen on postinoculation imaging (arrowhead). PET, positron emission tomography.

In the P. falciparum group, splenic SUVs increased +5.5% from baseline (CI +1.4% to +9.6%, paired t test p = 0.019), less than the prespecified 10% threshold. Splenic volume increased +22.9% from baseline but did not reach statistical significance (CI −15.3% to +61.1%, paired t test p = 0.20.) Participant 4 demonstrated a slight reduction in splenic volume, contrary to all other participants.

Compared to the P. falciparum group, the P. vivax group demonstrated a greater increase in splenic SUV from baseline to postinoculation imaging (+15.5% [CI −0.7% to +31.7%] versus +5.5% [CI +1.4% to +9.6%], unpaired t test p = 0.036). The change in splenic volume was larger in the P. vivax group compared to the P. falciparum group but did not reach statistical significance (+28.8% [CI +0.3% to +57.3%] versus +22.9% [CI −15.3% to +61.1%], unpaired t test p = 0.72).

Vertebral bone marrow imaging

Vertebral bone marrow SUVs were stable on postinoculation imaging in both the P. vivax group (+4.6% [CI −15.9% to +25.0%], paired t test p = 0.44) and the P. falciparum group (+3.2% [CI −3.2% to +9.6%], paired t test p = 0.17). Participant 2 (P. vivax group) was the only individual demonstrating a change in SUV above the prespecified 10% threshold. There was no significant difference in change in percentage change in SUV between the groups (unpaired t test p = 0.77).

Hepatic imaging

In both the P. vivax and P. falciparum groups, hepatic volume and SUVs remained stable on postinoculation imaging (P. vivax: hepatic volume: +0.2% [CI −23.6% to +24.0%], paired t test p = 0.84; SUV: +6.2% [CI −8.7% to +21.1%], paired t test p = 0.18; P. falciparum: hepatic volume: +3.9% [CI −6.2% to 14.0%], paired t test p = 0.32; SUV: −1.4% [CI −4.6% to +1.8%], paired t test p = 0.25). Participant 2 (P. vivax group) was the only individual demonstrating a change in SUV above the prespecified 10% threshold.

There was no significant difference in hepatic volume change or SUV change between the groups (percentage change in volume unpaired t test p = 0.56 and SUV unpaired t test p = 0.06).

Safety, clinical review, and laboratory parameters

No imaging-related adverse events or incidental radiological findings requiring clinical follow-up were recorded. All participants experienced symptoms of early malaria infection. Non-tender palpable splenomegaly was reported in Participant 3 following P. vivax inoculation on routine examination performed on the day of postinoculation imaging. This was present on inspiration, extended 1 cm below the costal margin, and resolved on follow-up examination 3 days following postinoculation imaging. Clinical hepatomegaly or splenomegaly was not reported for the remaining participants in either group.

Routine hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet count) and biochemistry (total bilirubin and alanine transaminase) measurements were collected at baseline, postinoculation (at time of treatment), and in convalescence for all participants. The majority of hematology and biochemistry measurements were within the laboratory reference range (S1 Fig, S2 Table). Changes in laboratory parameters in our study population were similar to those observed in the overall contributing IBSM study populations [26,27].

In the P. vivax group, hemoglobin and hematocrit decreased significantly between baseline and postinoculation (mean 148 g/L [CI 103 to 193] versus 137 g/L [CI 94 to 180], paired t test p = 0.045 and 0.43 L/L [CI 0.33 to 0.53] versus 0.39 L/L [CI 0.28 to 0.50], paired t test p = 0.008, respectively) and further at convalescence (148 g/L [CI 103 to 193] versus 133 g/L [CI 85 to 182], paired t test p = 0.004 and 0.43 L/L [CI 0.33 to 0.53] versus 0.38 L/L [CI 0.25 to 0.51], paired t test p = 0.020). Platelets decreased at postinoculation (206 × 109/L [CI 172 to 241] versus 134 × 109/L [CI 109 to 159], paired t test p = 0.034) and increased slightly compared to baseline at convalescence, but did not reach statistical significance (206 × 109/L [CI 172 to 241] versus 218 × 109/L [range 211 to 226], paired t test p = 0.28). There were no statistically significant changes in biochemistry measurements between baseline and postinoculation or between baseline and convalescence (S2 Table), although Participant 1 experienced a clinically relevant elevation in alanine transaminase in convalescence (Day 17, 86 IU/L, 2.2 ×upper limit of normal (ULN)). In the P. falciparum group, there were no statistically significant changes in hematology or biochemistry measurements between baseline and postinoculation or between baseline and convalescence (S2 Table). Participants 5, 6, and 7 each experienced elevated alanine transaminase measurements in convalescence (85 IU/L, 2.1 ×ULN; 73 IU/L, 1.8 ×ULN; 128 IU/L, 3.2 ×ULN, respectively).

Compared to the P. falciparum group, the hemoglobin decrease was greater from baseline to postinoculation in the P. vivax group (mean −7.2% [CI −13.4% to −1.1%] versus +1.2% [CI −1.3% to +3.8%], unpaired t test p = 0.003). This was similar for hematocrit (−8.7% [CI −13.5% to −3.9%] versus −2.3% [CI −6.4% to +1.9%], unpaired t test p = 0.017). Conversely, decrease in platelet count was greater from baseline to convalescence in the P. falciparum group compared to the P. vivax group (−33.5% [CI −69.5% to +2.5%] versus +5.9% [CI −10.7% to +22.6%], unpaired t test p = 0.035). There were no other differences between the groups in any other changes in hematology or biochemistry measurements.

Discussion

We demonstrate that medical imaging using PET and MRI are technically feasible and safe in experimental human P. vivax and P. falciparum infection and can define organ-specific physiological changes very early in disease. The increase in splenic volume and utilization of glucose on postinoculation imaging was most pronounced in the P. vivax group. Although the sample size is small, in the exploratory statistical comparisons, increase in splenic SUV was significantly greater in participants with P. vivax compared to those with P. falciparum. These findings suggest splenic tropism with both species early in the course of disease, but that it is significantly greater for P. vivax compared to P. falciparum.

Changes in splenic imaging metrics may be associated with either increased parasite or host activity, or a combination of both. This is consistent with nonhuman primate Plasmodium coatneyi infection studies, where increased splenic FDG uptake associated with accumulation of iRBCs in the red pulp and lymphoid hyperplasia have been reported [16]. In vitro studies have shown that iRBCs consume up to 100 times the amount of glucose than that consumed by uninfected erythrocytes [28] and that trophozoite uptake is up to 6-fold greater than that of ring stages [29]. While no Plasmodium studies have been performed to identify if this in vitro glucose consumption is sufficient to be detected by FDG PET, the principle of clinically detectable tracer uptake by pathogens has been demonstrated in bacteria [30]. Taken together, these findings may suggest that splenic FDG signal reflects iRBC accumulation within the spleen.

The spleen has been proposed as a site for accumulation of P. vivax infection [3,6,10,31]. The extent to which this occurs in early infection and in clinical disease is not clear. Indirect evidence points to accumulation of non-phagocytosed P. vivax iRBCs in the spleen in acute malaria [4,10], with supporting direct evidence from case reports [6,32]. Furthermore, early splenic rupture may occur more frequently in P. vivax compared to P. falciparum infection [33], which may suggest a greater tropism of this species for the spleen. In an ex vivo perfused spleen model, a subpopulation of P. falciparum ring stage parasites are retained in the red pulp of the spleen [34], hypothesized as mechanism to reduce acute host morbidity and prolong the duration of transmissible infection [35]. In a nonhuman primate P. vivax model, spleen-dependent expression of molecules mediating adhesion to human splenic fibroblasts has been described [36], suggesting the presence of a parasite phenotype that may favor splenic accumulation. Finally, very recent data suggest that immature reticulocytes accumulate in the human spleen providing a favorable niche for P. vivax accumulation [11]. We now show evidence supporting splenic tropism and splenic accumulation of P. vivax very early in infection.

Both P. falciparum [1,37] and P. vivax [9,38] have also been shown to infect the bone marrow. The lack of signal change in the vertebral bone marrow suggest that this tissue may have a lower parasite biomass in early infection, or alternatively, that parasites located in the bone marrow do not provoke as prominent host metabolic response. This is in keeping with a recent study suggesting that in acute vivax malaria, the parasite concentration in the bone marrow is, on average, no higher than that circulating in peripheral blood [38].

Similarly, while P. falciparum [1] and P. vivax [8] have been found in liver at autopsy, the absence of volume or tracer signal change in our study suggests that this may not be a site of accumulation early in infection. In our cohort, participants from both the P. vivax and P. falciparum groups experienced elevated transaminases in convalescence. Elevated transaminases following treatment have been previously described in experimental P. vivax [39], P. falciparum [40] infections, and in naturally acquired infection in non- or pauci-immune patients [39,41] and are unlikely to be related to imaging, but rather may be related to inflammation and hemolysis [39].

The P. vivax group experienced a greater decrease in hematology indices from baseline to postinoculation compared to the P. falciparum group. The greater removal of RBCs from circulation previously described in P. vivax infection compared to P. falciparum infection is thought to occur in the spleen [42], which may also contribute to the imaging findings. Reduction in platelets in experimental malaria has been previously described and may relate to splenic pooling or more generalized platelet removal from circulation due to endothelial activation or parasite killing [43]. We and others have previously described the association between endothelial activation and thrombocytopenia in experimental malaria [44,45], and labeled, auto-transfused platelets have been observed to undergo disseminated extra-splenic consumption in uncomplicated P. falciparum infection [46].

There were several limitations to this study. The population of the study was small, and statistical comparisons of baseline imaging to postinoculation imaging are necessarily of an exploratory nature, as there is limited power to discriminate between groups. Secondly, while FDG is a readily available radiotracer, it is relatively nonspecific and is unable to differentiate between host and parasite activity. Advances in radiochemistry may permit the development of a radiotracer with sufficient specificity to selectively image iRBCs. Finally, we were unable to control for other variables that may have influenced the differences observed between the groups such as parasitemia at the time of imaging.

To date, the ability to localize the pathology of malaria in life has been limited, and direct evaluation of sequestration and organ-specific parasite tropism has relied upon animal models and postmortem studies. Using the IBSM model, we have demonstrated that the medical imaging techniques MRI and PET may be used to study human P. vivax and P. falciparum infection in life and observe early infection in a way not previously possible. The presence of alterations in splenic glucose uptake and volume soon after blood-stage infection compared to baseline suggests that these imaging techniques may be useful to localize disease. The differences observed between species consolidates the concept of species-specific tissue tropism, where P. vivax has a greater predilection for the spleen. Our findings suggest that the hypothesized endosplenic life cycle of P. vivax may be established soon after blood-stage infection.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. STROBE Checklist.

(PDF)

S1 Text. Methods.

(PDF)

S2 Text. Results.

(PDF)

S1 Table. Abdominal quantitative imaging metrics.

(PDF)

S2 Table. Hematology and biochemistry parameters.

(PDF)

S1 Fig. Hematology and biochemistry parameters at baseline, postinoculation, and convalescence.

(A) Hemoglobin (g/L), (B) Hematocrit (L/L), (C) Platelets (10^9/L), (D) Total Bilirubin (mmol/L), and (E) ALT (IU/L).

(PDF)

S1 Protocol. Study protocol.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Louise Campbell and Peta Gray from HIRF for their help in coordinating the imaging of participants and Dr. Manoj Bhatt at the Department of Nuclear Medicine, RBWH for serving as the imaging medical monitor; Marita Prior at the Department of Radiology, RBWH for her help in coordinating the reporting of imaging; study staff at Q-Pharm Pty Ltd for their help in coordinating the IBSM participant exploratory study involvement; Medicines for Malaria Venture for encouraging investigator-initiated studies; and all participants for volunteering their time.

Abbreviations

CI

confidence interval

FDG

18-F fluorodeoxyglucose

IBSM

induced blood-stage malaria

iRBC

infected red blood cell

MRI

magnetic resonance imaging

PET

positron emission tomography

qPCR

quantitative polymerase chain reaction

ROI

region of interest

STROBE

Strengthening The Reporting of OBservational Studies in Epidemiology

SUV

standardized uptake value

ULN

upper limit of normal

Data Availability

Raw imaging files are electronically tagged with personally identifiable information and cannot be shared publicly to protect the confidentiality of participants. All other data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This project was supported by a HIRF Seed Funding Grant, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (J.W) and by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (J.S.M #1135955, #1037304, #1132975, and N.M.A #1135820, 1098334). The clinical trials contributing participants were funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (J.S.M #1132975), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (J.S.M OPP1111147) and the Global Health Innovative Technology Fund. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Marchiafava E, Bignami A. On summer-autumnal fever. London: New Sydenham. Society. 1894. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bass CC. An Attempt to Explain the Greater Pathogenicity of Plasmodium Falciparum as Compared with Other Species. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1921;s1-1(1):29–33. 10.4269/ajtmh.1921.s1-1.29 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baird JK. Evidence and Implications of Mortality Associated with Acute Plasmodium vivax Malaria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26(1):36–57. 10.1128/CMR.00074-12 PubMed Central PMCID: PMC23297258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Malleret B, Li A, Zhang R, Tan KSW, Suwanarusk R, Claser C, et al. Plasmodium vivax: restricted tropism and rapid remodeling of CD71-positive reticulocytes. Blood. 2015;125(8):1314–24. 10.1182/blood-2014-08-596015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gruszczyk J, Kanjee U, Chan L-J, Menant S, Malleret B, Lim NTY, et al. Transferrin receptor 1 is a reticulocyte-specific receptor for Plasmodium vivax. Science. 2018;359(6371):48–55. 10.1126/science.aan1078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Machado Siqueira A, Lopes Magalhaes BM, Cardoso Melo G, Ferrer M, Castillo P, Martin-Jaular L, et al. Spleen rupture in a case of untreated Plasmodium vivax infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(12):e1934. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001934 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kho S, Qotrunnada L, Leonardo L, Andries B, Wardani P, Fricot A, et al. Hidden biomass of intact malaria parasites in the human spleen. N Engl J Med. Forthcoming 2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lacerda MV, Fragoso SC, Alecrim MG, Alexandre MA, Magalhaes BM, Siqueira AM, et al. Postmortem characterization of patients with clinical diagnosis of Plasmodium vivax malaria: to what extent does this parasite kill? Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55(8):e67–74. 10.1093/cid/cis615 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Obaldia N 3rd, Meibalan E, Sa JM, Ma S, Clark MA, Mejia P, et al. Bone Marrow Is a Major Parasite Reservoir in Plasmodium vivax Infection. MBio. 2018;9(3). 10.1128/mBio.00625-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Barber BE, William T, Grigg MJ, Parameswaran U, Piera KA, Price RN, et al. Parasite biomass-related inflammation, endothelial activation, microvascular dysfunction and disease severity in vivax malaria. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(1):e1004558. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kho S, Qotrunnada L, Leonardo L, Andries B, Wardani P, Fricot A, et al. Evaluation of splenic accumulation and colocalization of immature reticulocytes and Plasmodium vivax in asymptomatic malaria: A prospective human splenectomy study. PLoS Med. 2021. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Seydel KB, Kampondeni SD, Valim C, Potchen MJ, Milner DA, Muwalo FW, et al. Brain swelling and death in children with cerebral malaria. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(12):1126–37. Epub 2015/03/19. 10.1056/NEJMoa1400116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Laothamatas J, Sammet CL, Golay X, Van Cauteren M, Lekprasert V, Tangpukdee N, et al. Transient lesion in the splenium of the corpus callosum in acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;90(6):1117–23. Epub 2014/03/13. 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Frolich AM, Tober-Lau P, Schonfeld M, Brehm TT, Kurth F, Vinnemeier CD, et al. Brain magnetic resonance imaging in imported malaria. Malar J. 2019;18(1):74. 10.1186/s12936-019-2713-2 Central PMCID: PMC6419340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sugiyama M, Ikeda E, Kawai S, Higuchi T, Zhang H, Khan N, et al. Cerebral metabolic reduction in severe malaria: fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging in a primate model of severe human malaria with cerebral involvement. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;71(5):542–5. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kawai S, Ikeda E, Sugiyama M, Matsumoto J, Higuchi T, Zhang H, et al. Enhancement of splenic glucose metabolism during acute malarial infection: correlation of findings of FDG-PET imaging with pathological changes in a primate model of severe human malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74(3):353–60. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jeph S, Thakur K, Shamim S, Aggarwal A. Malaria masquerading as relapse of Hodgkin’s lymphoma on contrast enhanced 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography: A diagnostic dilemma. Indian J Nucl Med. 2014;29:102–4. 10.4103/0972-3919.130299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rockett RJ, Tozer SJ, Peatey C, Bialasiewicz S, Whiley DM, Nissen MD, et al. A real-time, quantitative PCR method using hydrolysis probes for the monitoring of Plasmodium falciparum load in experimentally infected human volunteers. Malar J. 2011;10:48. 10.1186/1475-2875-10-48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McCarthy JS, Sekuloski S, Griffin PM, Elliott S, Douglas N, Peatey C, et al. A pilot randomised trial of induced blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum infections in healthy volunteers for testing efficacy of new antimalarial drugs. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(8):e21914. 10.1371/journal.pone.0021914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Griffin P, Pasay C, Elliott S, Sekuloski S, Sikulu M, Hugo L, et al. Safety and Reproducibility of a Clinical Trial System Using Induced Blood Stage Plasmodium vivax Infection and Its Potential as a Model to Evaluate Malaria Transmission. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(12):e0005139. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Karunanithi S, Soundararajan R, Sharma P, Naswa N, Bal C, Kumar R. Spectrum of Physiologic and Pathologic Skeletal Muscle (18)F-FDG Uptake on PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(2):W141–9. 10.2214/AJR.14.13457 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kumar P, Patel CD, Singla S, Malhotra A. Effect of duration of fasting and diet on the myocardial uptake of F-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) at rest. Indian J Nucl Med. 2014;29(3):140–5. Epub 2014/09/12. 10.4103/0972-3919.136559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lodge MA. Repeatability of SUV in Oncologic (18)F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(4):523–32. 10.2967/jnumed.116.186353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Paquet N, Albert A, Foidart J, Hustinx R. Within-patient variability of (18)F-FDG: standardized uptake values in normal tissues. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(5):784–8. Epub 2004/05/12. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gheysens O, Postnov A, Deroose CM, Vandermeulen C, de Hoon J, Declercq R, et al. Quantification, Variability, and Reproducibility of Basal Skeletal Muscle Glucose Uptake in Healthy Humans Using 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(10):1520–6. Epub 2015/08/01. 10.2967/jnumed.115.159715 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gaur AH, McCarthy JS, Panetta JC, Dallas RH, Woodford J, Tang L, et al. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antimalarial efficacy of a novel Plasmodium falciparum ATP4 inhibitor SJ733: a first-in-human and induced blood-stage malaria phase 1a/b trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020. 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30611-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Collins KA, Wang CY, Adams M, Mitchell H, Robinson GJ, Rampton M, et al. A Plasmodium vivax experimental human infection model for evaluating efficacy of interventions. J Clin Invest. 2020. 10.1172/JCI134923 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Roth E Jr., Plasmodium falciparum carbohydrate metabolism: a connection between host cell and parasite. Blood Cells. 1990;16(2–3):453–60; discussion 61–6. Epub 1990/01/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shivapurkar R, Hingamire T, Kulkarni AS, Rajamohanan PR, Reddy DS, Shanmugam D. Evaluating antimalarial efficacy by tracking glycolysis in Plasmodium falciparum using NMR spectroscopy. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):18076. 10.1038/s41598-018-36197-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Heuker M, Sijbesma JWA, Aguilar Suarez R, de Jong JR, Boersma HH, Luurtsema G, et al. In vitro imaging of bacteria using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose micro positron emission tomography. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4973. 10.1038/s41598-017-05403-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Adams WL. The role of the spleen in infectious diseases. Pac Med J. 1897;40(227). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lubitz JM. Pathology of rupture of the spleen in acute vivax malaria. Am J Pathol. 1948;24(3):724. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Imbert P, Rapp C, Buffet PA. Pathological rupture of the spleen in malaria: analysis of 55 cases (1958–2008). Travel Med Infect Dis. 2009;7(3):147–59. Epub 2009/05/05. 10.1016/j.tmaid.2009.01.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Safeukui I, Correas JM, Brousse V, Hirt D, Deplaine G, Mule S, et al. Retention of Plasmodium falciparum ring-infected erythrocytes in the slow, open microcirculation of the human spleen. Blood. 2008;112(6):2520–8. Epub 2008/06/27. 10.1182/blood-2008-03-146779 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Buffet PA, Safeukui I, Milon G, Mercereau-Puijalon O, David PH. Retention of erythrocytes in the spleen: a double-edged process in human malaria. Curr Opin Hematol. 2009;16(3):157–64. 10.1097/MOH.0b013e32832a1d4b . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fernandez-Becerra C, Bernabeu M, Castellanos A, Correa BR, Obadia T, Ramirez M, et al. Plasmodium vivax spleen-dependent genes encode antigens associated with cytoadhesion and clinical protection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(23):13056–65. 10.1073/pnas.1920596117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Joice R, Nilsson SK, Montgomery J, Dankwa S, Egan E, Morahan B, et al. Plasmodium falciparum transmission stages accumulate in the human bone marrow. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(244):244re5. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008882 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brito MAM, Baro B, Raiol TC, Ayllon-Hermida A, Safe IP, Deroost K, et al. Morphological and Transcriptional Changes in Human Bone Marrow During Natural Plasmodium vivax Malaria Infections. J Infect Dis. 2020. 10.1093/infdis/jiaa177 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Odedra A, Webb L, Marquart L, Britton L, Chalon S, Moehrle J, et al. Liver function test abnormalities in experimental and clinical Plasmodium vivax infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103(5):1910–7. 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chughlay FM, Akakpo S, Odedra A, Csermak-Renner K, Djeriou E, Winnips C, et al. Liver enzyme elevations in Plasmodium falciparum volunteer infection studies: findings and recommendations. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103(1):378–93. Epub 20 April 2020. 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0846 PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7356411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Woodford J, Shanks GD, Griffin P, Chalon S, McCarthy JS. The Dynamics of Liver Function Test Abnormalities after Malaria Infection: A Retrospective Observational Study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98(4):1113–9. 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Douglas NM, Anstey NM, Buffet PA, Poespoprodjo JR, Yeo TW, White NJ, et al. The anaemia of Plasmodium vivax malaria. Malar J. 2012;11:135. 10.1186/1475-2875-11-135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kho S, Barber BE, Johar E, Andries B, Poespoprodjo JR, Kenangalem E, et al. Platelets kill circulating parasites of all major Plasmodium species in human malaria. Blood. 2018;132(12):1332–44. 10.1182/blood-2018-05-849307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Woodford J, Yeo TW, Piera KA, Butler K, Weinberg JB, McCarthy JS, et al. Early Endothelial Activation Precedes Glycocalyx Degradation and Microvascular Dysfunction in Experimentally Induced Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax Infection. Infect Immun. 2020;88(5). 10.1128/IAI.00895-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.de Mast Q, Groot E, Lenting PJ, de Groot PG, McCall M, Sauerwein RW, et al. Thrombocytopenia and release of activated von Willebrand Factor during early Plasmodium falciparum malaria. J Infect Dis. 2007;196(4):622–8. 10.1086/519844 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Karanikas G, Zedwitz-Liebenstein K, Eidherr H, Schuetz M, Sauerman R, Dudczak R, et al. Platelet kinetics and scintigraphic imaging in thrombocytopenic malaria patients. Thromb Haemost. 2004;91(3):553–7. Epub 2004/02/26. 10.1160/TH03-07-0489 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Artur Arikainen

25 Sep 2020

Dear Dr Woodford,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript entitled "Positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in experimental human malaria: greater early splenic tropism in Plasmodium vivax than Plasmodium falciparum infection" for consideration by PLOS Medicine.

Your manuscript has now been evaluated by the PLOS Medicine editorial staff as well as by an academic editor with relevant expertise and I am writing to let you know that we would like to send your submission out for external peer review.

However, before we can send your manuscript to reviewers, we need you to complete your submission by providing the metadata that is required for full assessment. To this end, please login to Editorial Manager where you will find the paper in the 'Submissions Needing Revisions' folder on your homepage. Please click 'Revise Submission' from the Action Links and complete all additional questions in the submission questionnaire.

Please re-submit your manuscript within two working days, i.e. by .

Login to Editorial Manager here: https://www.editorialmanager.com/pmedicine

Once your full submission is complete, your paper will undergo a series of checks in preparation for peer review. Once your manuscript has passed all checks it will be sent out for review.

Feel free to email us at plosmedicine@plos.org if you have any queries relating to your submission.

Kind regards,

Artur Arikainen,

Associate Editor

PLOS Medicine

Decision Letter 1

Artur Arikainen

23 Oct 2020

Dear Dr. Woodford,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in experimental human malaria: greater early splenic tropism in Plasmodium vivax than Plasmodium falciparum infection" (PMEDICINE-D-20-04576R1) for consideration at PLOS Medicine.

Your paper was evaluated by a senior editor and discussed among all the editors here. It was also discussed with an academic editor with relevant expertise, and sent to independent reviewers, including a statistical reviewer. The reviews are appended at the bottom of this email and any accompanying reviewer attachments can be seen via the link below:

[LINK]

In light of these reviews, I am afraid that we will not be able to accept the manuscript for publication in the journal in its current form, but we would like to consider a revised version that addresses the reviewers' and editors' comments. Obviously we cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response, and we plan to seek re-review by one or more of the reviewers.

In revising the manuscript for further consideration, your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer and the editors. Please also check the guidelines for revised papers at http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/s/revising-your-manuscript for any that apply to your paper. In your rebuttal letter you should indicate your response to the reviewers' and editors' comments, the changes you have made in the manuscript, and include either an excerpt of the revised text or the location (eg: page and line number) where each change can be found. Please submit a clean version of the paper as the main article file; a version with changes marked should be uploaded as a marked up manuscript.

In addition, we request that you upload any figures associated with your paper as individual TIF or EPS files with 300dpi resolution at resubmission; please read our figure guidelines for more information on our requirements: http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/s/figures. While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the PACE digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at PLOSMedicine@plos.org.

We expect to receive your revised manuscript by Nov 13 2020 11:59PM. Please email us (plosmedicine@plos.org) if you have any questions or concerns.

***Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.***

We ask every co-author listed on the manuscript to fill in a contributing author statement, making sure to declare all competing interests. If any of the co-authors have not filled in the statement, we will remind them to do so when the paper is revised. If all statements are not completed in a timely fashion this could hold up the re-review process. If new competing interests are declared later in the revision process, this may also hold up the submission. Should there be a problem getting one of your co-authors to fill in a statement we will be in contact. YOU MUST NOT ADD OR REMOVE AUTHORS UNLESS YOU HAVE ALERTED THE EDITOR HANDLING THE MANUSCRIPT TO THE CHANGE AND THEY SPECIFICALLY HAVE AGREED TO IT. You can see our competing interests policy here: http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/s/competing-interests.

Please use the following link to submit the revised manuscript:

https://www.editorialmanager.com/pmedicine/

Your article can be found in the "Submissions Needing Revision" folder.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/s/submission-guidelines#loc-methods.

Please ensure that the paper adheres to the PLOS Data Availability Policy (see http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/s/data-availability), which requires that all data underlying the study's findings be provided in a repository or as Supporting Information. For data residing with a third party, authors are required to provide instructions with contact information for obtaining the data. PLOS journals do not allow statements supported by "data not shown" or "unpublished results." For such statements, authors must provide supporting data or cite public sources that include it.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Sincerely,

Artur Arikainen,

Associate Editor

PLOS Medicine

plosmedicine.org

-----------------------------------------------------------

Requests from the editors:

1. Please address the reviewers’ comments below.

2. Please revise your title according to PLOS Medicine's style. Your title must be nondeclarative and not a question. It should begin with main concept if possible. "Effect of" should be used only if causality can be inferred, i.e., for an RCT. Please place the study design ("A randomized controlled trial," "A retrospective study," "A modelling study," etc.) in the subtitle (ie, after a colon).

3. Abstract:

a. Please include summary participant demographics (age, sex, etc.).

b. Please include study dates and setting.

c. Please quantify all results with p values and 95% CIs.

d. In the last sentence of the Abstract Methods and Findings section, please describe the main limitation(s) of the study's methodology.

e. Line 54: Please begin with “In this study, we observed that…”

f. Please include trial registration numbers for the included studies.

4. At this stage, we ask that you include a short, non-technical Author Summary of your research to make findings accessible to a wide audience that includes both scientists and non-scientists. The Author Summary should immediately follow the Abstract in your revised manuscript. This text is subject to editorial change and should be distinct from the scientific abstract. Please see our author guidelines for more information: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/s/revising-your-manuscript#loc-author-summary

5. Methods: Please also include trial registration numbers for the two published studies.

6. Line 215: Please avoid “approaching statistical significance” – instead state “was not statistically significant”.

7. Please include as Supporting Information the full protocol for this specific analysis/sub-study, as approved by the ethics committee prior to the start of the study.

8. Please ensure that the study is reported according to, for example, the STROBE or TREND guidelines (which can be found here: http://www.equator-network.org/), and include the completed checklist as Supporting Information. When completing the checklist, please use section and paragraph numbers, rather than page numbers. Please add the following statement, or similar, to the Methods: "This study is reported as per the ___ guideline (S1 Checklist).

---

Comments from the reviewers:

Reviewer #1: The authors report a very interesting and singular report using PET imaging to generate evidence of a relatively high degree of tropism for splenic tissues by P. vivax compared to P. falciparum.

Some concerns:

1) The authors seem to presume readers understand PET imaging technology. The introduction should make clear precisely what is being detected, i.e., increased glucose consumption per se rather than any parasite-specific signal. The greatest uncertainty appears barely acknowledged -- that PET signal from the spleen may not be parasite biomass, but simply downstream physiological responses to the infection unrelated to biomass in a quantitative sense.

2) The authors cite the specific findings of Barber et al. 2015 (ref.7) that suggested a dominant biomass seated in extravascular spaces, and then express of those, "Nonetheless, this hypothesis is challenging to confirm...". With specific regard to that hypothesis, were Barber et al. the first to propose it? Those authors seem to be point to the CMR review by Baird in 2013 as its origin, as do others.

3) There appears to have been a merging error as the legend to Figure 3 does not appear in the PDF. The difference between baseline and post-inoculation appears wholly unremarkable to this reviewer's untrained eye.

4) Reference 3 seems quite important here but is not yet available and, so far as one may now suppose, may not be available in the near future. Are the authors supposing acceptance and full citation by the time this paper gets to press? If so, the details of that investigation should appear in this manuscript. It is not reasonable to cite it as though available, but to withhold the essential findings.

5) The most compelling evidence of extavascular tropism for P. vivax is not described or cited by the authors, appearing to be a significant omission. Specifically, the multiple papers from the laboratories of Bruce Russell, Benoit Malleret, Laurent Renia, and Wei Hong Tham, especially their Science paper of 2018. If P. vivax invasion occurs only in the youngest reticulocytes (and erythroblasts) expressing CD71, an infection of extravascular hemopoietic tissues (like those in the marrow and spleen) may logically be where the infectious biomass is seated. The exclusion of direct molecular evidence in the context of the original hyposthesis of extravascular tropism is unfortunate.

Reviewer #2: A hot topic in contemporary malaria research is whether there are hidden life cycles of malaria parasites in certain organs. Discussed sites, where hidden life cycles might occur, include the bone marrow and the spleen. However, conclusive experimental data in support of hidden life cycles are scarce. Woodford et al. have now used an elegant in vivo, whole body imaging techniques to detect organs in which the glucose biomimetic [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose accumulates during the course of experimentally induced P. falciparum and P. vivax blood stage infections in human volunteers. The data presented suggest a strong splenic tropism for P. vivax and, to a lesser extent, for P. falciparum, but no accumulation in the bone marrow or the liver. These findings are interpreted in terms of a putative P. vivax replicative cycle in the spleen.

The selling point of the manuscript is the combination of the imaging technique with the experimentally induced blood stage infection in human volunteers. The observations made are potentially of interest, albeit they do not exclude the possibility of hidden life cycles occurring in organs other than the spleen at later time points in the infection, respectively at higher parasitemia.

Queries:

1. This reviewer assumes that the standard uptake value refers to the uptake of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose. This should be better explained in the manuscript. Can the SUV be converted into absolute molecule numbers?

2. The different host cell tropism of P. falciparum (mature erythrocytes) and P. vivax (reticulocytes) should be mentioned.

3. The number of volunteers is quite small, raising concerns regarding the statistical significance of the findings.

4. Is the enhanced splenic activity due to replicating parasites or is it a reflection of increased immunological activity, e.g., by macrophages present in the splenic cord, which remove lysed infected reticulocytes and/or pitted parasites following their destruction at the splenic slits?

5. The text could be substantially shortened and the number of display items could be reduced to two.

Reviewer #3: See attachment

Michael Dewey

Reviewer #4: General comments:

This is an interesting pilot study demonstrating the value of performing imaging in controlled human malaria infection studies. Despite the fact that the number of volunteers in the study is extremely small, the pioneering nature of the research should be applauded.

However, the main conclusion of the manuscript "greater early splenic tropism in Plasmodium vivax than Plasmodium falciparum infection" seems to be driven primarily by a significant different change in SUV between Pf and Pv inoculated volunteers. Here, there seems to be an error in the analysis. Line 216 states that splenic SUV for the Pv group increases a median of 15.9% (range 8.8-21.8%) whereas line 227 states that splenic SUV in the Pv group increased a median of 27.6% (range 18.0-40.8%). Given this discrepancy, it seems that, comparing with data from table S1, the data from the splenic volume change in the Pv group (median 27.6%) have been accidentally swapped with the data from splenic SUV change (median 21.8%). This should be corrected. Preferably, the statistical tests used for these data should be listed in the results section.

Looking at the graphs presented in figure 2, it seems to me that the difference between splenic SUV change in Pf and Pv inoculated volunteers is mainly driven by one volunteer in the Pf group who had a high baseline SUV and thus did not further increase. Given the high baseline SUV, this volunteer might significantly bias data.

Furthermore, I feel that the clinical review and laboratory parameters could have included more data than just the subset of volunteers for which scans were available. It does not make sense to exclusively present clinical and laboratory data from only the 7 individuals in this paper only, whilst much more data is available from the referenced studies. I would recommend expanding this section to include more data from all participants in the studies.

Lastly, a minor comment regarding the liver enzyme elevations which were detected. Given the timelapse between imaging and enzyme abnormalities (1-2 weeks), it does not seem justified to draw any conclusions on the etiology based on imaging and enzymes correlations.

Any attachments provided with reviews can be seen via the following link:

[LINK]

Attachment

Submitted filename: woodford.pdf

Decision Letter 2

Artur Arikainen

29 Jan 2021

Dear Dr. Woodford,

Thank you very much for re-submitting your manuscript "Positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in experimental human malaria: a prospective cohort study to identify organ-specific changes in morphology and glucose metabolism" (PMEDICINE-D-20-04576R2) for review by PLOS Medicine.

I have discussed the paper with my colleagues and the academic editor and it was also seen again by three reviewers. I am pleased to say that provided the remaining editorial and production issues are dealt with we are planning to accept the paper for publication in the journal.

The remaining issues that need to be addressed are listed at the end of this email. Any accompanying reviewer attachments can be seen via the link below. Please take these into account before resubmitting your manuscript:

[LINK]

***Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.***

In revising the manuscript for further consideration here, please ensure you address the specific points made by each reviewer and the editors. In your rebuttal letter you should indicate your response to the reviewers' and editors' comments and the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please submit a clean version of the paper as the main article file. A version with changes marked must also be uploaded as a marked up manuscript file.

Please also check the guidelines for revised papers at http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/s/revising-your-manuscript for any that apply to your paper. If you haven't already, we ask that you provide a short, non-technical Author Summary of your research to make findings accessible to a wide audience that includes both scientists and non-scientists. The Author Summary should immediately follow the Abstract in your revised manuscript. This text is subject to editorial change and should be distinct from the scientific abstract.

We expect to receive your revised manuscript within 1 week. Please email us (plosmedicine@plos.org) if you have any questions or concerns.

We ask every co-author listed on the manuscript to fill in a contributing author statement. If any of the co-authors have not filled in the statement, we will remind them to do so when the paper is revised. If all statements are not completed in a timely fashion this could hold up the re-review process. Should there be a problem getting one of your co-authors to fill in a statement we will be in contact. YOU MUST NOT ADD OR REMOVE AUTHORS UNLESS YOU HAVE ALERTED THE EDITOR HANDLING THE MANUSCRIPT TO THE CHANGE AND THEY SPECIFICALLY HAVE AGREED TO IT.

Please ensure that the paper adheres to the PLOS Data Availability Policy (see http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/s/data-availability), which requires that all data underlying the study's findings be provided in a repository or as Supporting Information. For data residing with a third party, authors are required to provide instructions with contact information for obtaining the data. PLOS journals do not allow statements supported by "data not shown" or "unpublished results." For such statements, authors must provide supporting data or cite public sources that include it.

Please note, when your manuscript is accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you've already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosmedicine@plos.org.

If you have any questions in the meantime, please contact me or the journal staff on plosmedicine@plos.org.  

We look forward to receiving the revised manuscript by Feb 05 2021 11:59PM.   

Sincerely,

Artur Arikainen,

Associate Editor 

PLOS Medicine

plosmedicine.org

------------------------------------------------------------

Requests from Editors:

1. Title: Please update to: “Positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in experimental human malaria to identify organ-specific changes in morphology and glucose metabolism: A cohort study”

2. Data Availability Statement: On the submission form you answer “No - some restrictions will apply” followed by “All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.” Please clarify whether or not there is any restriction on data sharing, and update the statement to be consistent.

3. Please include line numbers in your margin throughout.

4. Abstract: Please quantify the results presented (including p values and 95% CIs): “There was no change in FDG uptake in the bone marrow or liver following infection with either species. In participants with P. vivax, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet count decreased from baseline at the time of post-inoculation imaging. Decrements in hemoglobin and hematocrit were significantly greater in participants with P. vivax infection compared to P. falciparum.”

5. Author Summary: Please clarify “sequester”, “extravascular”, “reticulocyte”, “pharmacokinetic”, and “tropism” for a lay reader, or replace with simpler terms.

6. Please remove spaces from within citations, eg: “…for immature reticulocytes [4,5].”

7. Table 1: The terms gender and sex are not interchangeable (as discussed in http://www.who.int/gender/whatisgender/en/ ); please use the appropriate term.

8. References:

a. 5: Remove “”, and remove “(New York, NY)”

b. 7 and 39: Papers cannot be listed in the reference list until they have been accepted for publication or are otherwise publicly accessible (for example, in a preprint archive). The information may be cited in the text as a personal communication with the author if the author provides written permission to be named. Alternatively, please provide a different appropriate reference.

c. Please double check journal short names for accuracy/consistency.

9. When completing the STROBE checklist, please use section and paragraph numbers, rather than page numbers.

---

Comments from Reviewers:

Reviewer #1: The authors have done a thorough job of revision, addressing any concerns this reviewer had. This is a very interesting study of merit.

Reviewer #2: The authors have substantially improved the manuscript. All my comments have been addressed.

Reviewer #3: The authors have addressed all my points.

Michael Dewey

Any attachments provided with reviews can be seen via the following link:

[LINK]

Decision Letter 3

Beryne Odeny

10 Feb 2021

Dear Dr. Woodford,

Thank you very much for re-submitting your manuscript "Positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in experimental human malaria to identify organ-specific changes in morphology and glucose metabolism: a prospective cohort study" (PMEDICINE-D-20-04576R3) for review by PLOS Medicine.

I have discussed the paper with my colleagues and the academic editor and it was also seen again by xxx reviewers. I am pleased to say that provided the remaining editorial and production issues are dealt with we are planning to accept the paper for publication in the journal.

The remaining issues that need to be addressed are listed at the end of this email. Any accompanying reviewer attachments can be seen via the link below. Please take these into account before resubmitting your manuscript:

[LINK]

***Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.***

In revising the manuscript for further consideration here, please ensure you address the specific points made by each reviewer and the editors. In your rebuttal letter you should indicate your response to the reviewers' and editors' comments and the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please submit a clean version of the paper as the main article file. A version with changes marked must also be uploaded as a marked up manuscript file.

Please also check the guidelines for revised papers at http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/s/revising-your-manuscript for any that apply to your paper. If you haven't already, we ask that you provide a short, non-technical Author Summary of your research to make findings accessible to a wide audience that includes both scientists and non-scientists. The Author Summary should immediately follow the Abstract in your revised manuscript. This text is subject to editorial change and should be distinct from the scientific abstract.

We expect to receive your revised manuscript within 1 week. Please email us (plosmedicine@plos.org) if you have any questions or concerns.

We ask every co-author listed on the manuscript to fill in a contributing author statement. If any of the co-authors have not filled in the statement, we will remind them to do so when the paper is revised. If all statements are not completed in a timely fashion this could hold up the re-review process. Should there be a problem getting one of your co-authors to fill in a statement we will be in contact. YOU MUST NOT ADD OR REMOVE AUTHORS UNLESS YOU HAVE ALERTED THE EDITOR HANDLING THE MANUSCRIPT TO THE CHANGE AND THEY SPECIFICALLY HAVE AGREED TO IT.

Please ensure that the paper adheres to the PLOS Data Availability Policy (see http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/s/data-availability), which requires that all data underlying the study's findings be provided in a repository or as Supporting Information. For data residing with a third party, authors are required to provide instructions with contact information for obtaining the data. PLOS journals do not allow statements supported by "data not shown" or "unpublished results." For such statements, authors must provide supporting data or cite public sources that include it.

Please note, when your manuscript is accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you've already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosmedicine@plos.org.

If you have any questions in the meantime, please contact me or the journal staff on plosmedicine@plos.org.  

We look forward to receiving the revised manuscript by Feb 17 2021 11:59PM.   

Sincerely,

Beryne Odeny

Associate Editor 

PLOS Medicine

plosmedicine.org

------------------------------------------------------------

Requests from Editors:

-Reference 11 listed as under review, papers cannot be listed in the reference list until they have been accepted for publication or are otherwise publicly accessible (for example, in a preprint archive). The information may be cited in the text as a personal communication with the author if the author provides written permission to be named. Alternatively, please provide a different appropriate reference. If you opt to text as a personal communication, please provide the name of the individual, the affiliation, and date of communication. The individual named must provide written permission to be named.

-Please include legends in the Supporting Information files (Tables/Figure)

-In the main text, we cannot locate where the quantitative/statistical results have been reported for the blood/biochemistry results (seems to be reported in text for Pv group but not Pf).

-The statistical reporting in Figure S1 is not clear. Please add the results for the comparisons to the figure or place the results in a table if they are not in the text as they need to be reported.

Comments from Reviewers:

Any attachments provided with reviews can be seen via the following link:

[LINK]

Decision Letter 4

Beryne Odeny

17 Feb 2021

Dear Dr Woodford, 

On behalf of my colleagues and the Academic Editor, Lorenz Von Seidlein, I am pleased to inform you that we have agreed to publish your manuscript "Positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in experimental human malaria to identify organ-specific changes in morphology and glucose metabolism: a prospective cohort study" (PMEDICINE-D-20-04576R4) in PLOS Medicine.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. Please be aware that it may take several days for you to receive this email; during this time no action is required by you. Once you have received these formatting requests, please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes.

In the meantime, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pmedicine/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production process. 

PRESS

We frequently collaborate with press offices. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. If the press office is planning to promote your findings, we would be grateful if they could coordinate with medicinepress@plos.org. If you have not yet opted out of the early version process, we ask that you notify us immediately of any press plans so that we may do so on your behalf.

We also ask that you take this opportunity to read our Embargo Policy regarding the discussion, promotion and media coverage of work that is yet to be published by PLOS. As your manuscript is not yet published, it is bound by the conditions of our Embargo Policy. Please be aware that this policy is in place both to ensure that any press coverage of your article is fully substantiated and to provide a direct link between such coverage and the published work. For full details of our Embargo Policy, please visit http://www.plos.org/about/media-inquiries/embargo-policy/.

Thank you again for submitting to PLOS Medicine. We look forward to publishing your paper. 

Sincerely, 

Beryne Odeny 

Associate Editor 

PLOS Medicine

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Checklist. STROBE Checklist.

    (PDF)

    S1 Text. Methods.

    (PDF)

    S2 Text. Results.

    (PDF)

    S1 Table. Abdominal quantitative imaging metrics.

    (PDF)

    S2 Table. Hematology and biochemistry parameters.

    (PDF)

    S1 Fig. Hematology and biochemistry parameters at baseline, postinoculation, and convalescence.

    (A) Hemoglobin (g/L), (B) Hematocrit (L/L), (C) Platelets (10^9/L), (D) Total Bilirubin (mmol/L), and (E) ALT (IU/L).

    (PDF)

    S1 Protocol. Study protocol.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: woodford.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: ResponseToReviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: ResponseToReviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: ResponseToReviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Raw imaging files are electronically tagged with personally identifiable information and cannot be shared publicly to protect the confidentiality of participants. All other data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS Medicine are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES