Skip to main content
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters logoLink to ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
. 2021 Apr 8;12(5):812–816. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.1c00079

Design and Catalyzed Activation of Mycophenolic Acid Prodrugs

Michael A Plunk , Jeremy M Quintana , Carly M Darden , Michael C Lawrence ‡,§, Bashoo Naziruddin ‡,, Robert R Kane †,‡,*
PMCID: PMC8155237  PMID: 34055230

Abstract

graphic file with name ml1c00079_0010.jpg

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) and its morpholino ester prodrug mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are widely used in solid organ transplantation. These drugs prevent rejection due to their potent inhibition of inosine-5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), an enzyme vital for lymphocyte proliferation. As a strategy to provide localized immunosuppression in cell transplantation, four mycophenolic acid prodrugs designed to release MPA by two distinct mechanisms were synthesized and characterized. A nitrobenzyl ether prodrug was effectively converted to MPA upon exposure to bacterial nitroreductase, while a propargyl ether was converted to the active drug by immobilized Pd0 nanoparticles. In vitro, both prodrugs were inactive against IMPDH and exhibited reduced toxicity relative to the active drug, suggesting their potential for providing localized immunosuppression.

Keywords: Prodrug, Enzyme prodrug therapy, Bioorthogonal organometallic activation, Nitroreductase, Mycophenolic acid


The transplantation of hepatocytes or pancreatic islet cell-clusters are two promising approaches to address impaired/missing liver function or Type-1 diabetes, respectively. However, these cellular transplants encounter significant challenges due to the challenging tissue isolation procedures and the complete exposure of donor cells to host tissues and blood. Our group is exploring strategies to protect these transplants by the local delivery of potent small-molecule immunomodulators. We recently demonstrated that a prodrug of the potent toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) inhibitor TAK-2421,2 can be covalently immobilized on islet surfaces without adverse impact on the tissue viability or function. Slow post-transplant release of the active drug from the transplant tissue can suppress innate inflammation and significantly improved outcomes in a murine model of islet transplantation.3 More recently, we have envisioned a second strategy for localized drug delivery, wherein immobilized catalysts are cotransplanted with graft tissue in order to activate reactive prodrugs (Figure 1). In that regard, we recently reported TAK-242 prodrugs that are activated by either Pd0 nanoparticles or nitroreductase.4

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Two strategies for transplant-localized drug delivery. (A) Covalently modified tissue slowly releases active drug. (B) Systemically administered prodrug is activated by localized catalysts.

Subsequent to the acute innate inflammation during the early peri-transplant period, transplanted tissue is also subject to rejection by the innate and adaptive immune system. Mycophenolic acid (MPA, 1), and its morpholino ester prodrug mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 2, CellCept) (Figure 2) are widely used in solid organ transplantion to prevent rejection,5,6 as they reduce lymphocyte proliferation by the inhibition of inosine-5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH).7 We now report the synthesis and characterization of mycophenolic acid prodrugs for localized immunosuppression in cell transplantation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Structures of mycophenolic acid 1 and ester prodrug 2.

Prodrug derivatives of MPA have been previously reported. The ester prodrug mycophenolate mofetil (2) is rapidly converted to MPA (1) by serum and liver esterases, and while it provides improved oral bioavailability it does not afford opportunity for localized delivery.8 More recently, a clickable, acid labile MPA prodrug was reported for the modification of hydrogels, which could be implanted to provide a localized release of the active drug upon exposure to a lower pH at a site of inflammation.9 In contrast, our strategy for localized delivery involves the systemic administration of prodrug and its localized activation at a target site. We chose to evaluate two complementary approaches for prodrug activation - bioorthogonal organometallic (BOOM) chemistry,1013 where metal catalysts reveal the active drug, and directed enzyme prodrug therapy (DEPT),1420 which utilizes exogenous enzymes for prodrug activation.

For the preparation of BOOM-reactive prodrugs we chose to explore propargyl derivatives of MPA, which were anticipated to release the parent drug (and hydroxyacetone) upon exposure to Pd nanoparticles embedded in TentaGel resin.2124 Accordingly, MPA was reacted with propargyl bromide and DBU, readily affording the bis-propargyl prodrug 3 (Scheme 1). Aqueous hydrolysis of ester 3 then gave the monopropargyl derivative 4 in good yield. We also prepared p-nitrobenzyl (pNB) protected prodrugs, which could be converted to the active compound by nitroreductase, a bacterial enzyme commonly used in DEPT.25,26 For these derivatives, enzymatic reduction of the prodrug nitro group is followed by a 1,6-elimination, releasing the active compound.27,28 Reaction of MPA with p-nitrobenzyl chloride and triethyl amine provided the bis-pNB prodrug 5 (Scheme 1), which was readily hydrolyzed, yielding mono-pNB derivative 6 in good yield.

Scheme 1. Synthesis of MPA Prodrugs 3–6.

Scheme 1

With MPA derivatives 36 in hand, their suitability as prodrugs was first examined. First, these compounds were evaluated for residual IMPDH2 activity (MPA inhibits both isoforms of IMPDH) using a standard in vitro assay. In this assay, while 10 μM MPA completely inhibits the enzyme, none of the derivatives showed significant activity at this concentration (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

IMPDH2 activity assay. IMPDH2 was treated with MPA (1) and derivatives 3–6 and stimulated with inosine-5′-monophosphate and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+). Conversion of NAD+ to NADH was monitored at 340 nm.

The acute toxicity of the new compounds was evaluated in vitro in a pancreatic β-cell model (MIN6 cell line29) and in primary human hepatocytes (Figure 4). Briefly, cells were cultured in the presence of the various new compounds or MPA for 48 h and then dehydrogenase activity was determined with a colorimetric assay (CCK8). In the β-cell model MPA was relatively toxic (EC50 = 0.6 μM), while prodrug 6 was the lone prodrug exhibiting toxicity, albeit at a 40-fold higher concentration (EC50 = 24.0 μM). In human hepatocytes, the two acid prodrugs (4 and 6) were the least toxic (EC50 values of 20.1 and 14.4 μM, respectively). The toxicity of the two ester prodrugs 3 and 5 (EC50 values of 6.7 and 8.3 μM, respectively) were more similar to the parent drug (EC50 = 5.9 μM).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Toxicity was assessed for the five compounds by using CCK-8 assay on (a) MIN6 cells and (b) human hepatocytes.

Before characterizing the conversion of the prodrugs to MPA we evaluated the aqueous stability of these compounds in the absence of the activating catalysts. Not surprisingly, the disubstituted esters 3 and 5 slowly hydrolyzed in neutral phosphate buffered saline (PBS), while the monosubstituted ethers 4 and 6 were stable under these conditions (Figure 5). Due to the instability of the disubstituted compounds, coupled with their poor aqueous solubility, ethers 4 and 6 were selected for further evaluation as catalyst activated prodrugs.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Aqueous stability of prodrugs 36 assessed via incubation in PBS (pH 7.4, 5% DMSO) at 37 °C in the absence of catalyst.

We then evaluated the release of active MPA from prodrugs 4 and 6 using catalysts immobilized on functionalized 30 μm polystyrene beads. For the activation of propargyl ether 4 we utilized the same Pd0-modifiedTentaGel resins13 as in our previous studies on propargyl-substituted TAK-242 prodrugs.3 For activating the nitrobenzyl ether 6 we conjugated nitroreductase to amino terminated polystyrene beads via a simple reductive amination procedure,30 Using Pd0-modified beads (1 mg/mL, PBS w/5% DMSO, 37 °C), propargyl prodrug 4 underwent clean conversion to the parent drug MPA (1) over ∼2 days (Figure 6). Likewise, enzymatic activation of nitrobenzyl prodrug 6 with nitroreductase beads (2 mg/mL, PBS, 5% DMSO, 37 °C) in the presence of the reducing cofactor β-nicotinamide adenine dinuclotide (NADH, 1 mg/mL) led to the efficient production of free MPA (1). The reduced amine intermediate was not observed, suggesting that the 1,6-elimination was rapid. We found that the resins could be reused, and quantified the MPA release from 4, showing that the conversion was clean and quantitative (see Supporting Information). Nitrobenzyl prodrug 6 was not unmasked by treatment with Pd0-modified beads, demonstrating the specificity of the activation chemistry.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Catalyzed release of mycophenolic acid (1) was determined by incubating 4 and 6 in PBS (pH 7.4, 5% DMSO) with the appropriate solid supported catalyst: (a) prodrug 4 with Pd0; (b) prodrug 6 with nitroreductase and NADH.

In summary, we have synthesized four mycophenolic acid derivatives and characterized the two most promising compounds as prodrugs for localized immunosuppression. The prodrugs do not exhibit IMPDH2 activity characteristic of the parent drug, show less in vitro toxicity than the parent drug in two relevant cell lines, and are stable in buffer but rapidly converted to MPA by treatment with the appropriate solid-supported catalyst. We are presently evaluating the use of these prodrugs for the protection of islet and hepatocyte31 grafts.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor Asier Unciti-Broceta for helpful conversations and for providing Pd0-resins.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications Web site. The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.1c00079.

  • Full experimental details for the synthesis of prodrugs 36, HPLC measurement of prodrug hydrolysis, catalytic activation and release of parent drug, nitroreductase immobilization, IMPDH2 activity assay, and cell toxicity assays (PDF)

Author Contributions

M.A.P. synthesized and characterized the prodrugs, performed the kinetic analyses, and produced the manuscript. J.M.Q. performed the toxicity assay on human hepatocytes and contributed to the manuscript preparation. C.M.D. performed the toxicity assay on MIN6 cells and contributed to the manuscript preparation. M.C.L., B.N., and R.R.K. guided the experimentation and edited the manuscript. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIH) under Award Number R15DK127340, the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (Grant 1-INO-2019-787–S-B), and Baylor University (Faculty Research Investment Program and URSA funding).

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ml1c00079_si_001.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

References

  1. Ii M.; Matsunaga N.; Hazeki K.; Nakamura K.; Takashima K.; Seya T.; Hazeki O.; Kitazaki T.; Iizawa Y. A Novel Cyclohexene Derivative, Ethyl (6R)-6-[N-(2-Chloro-4-fluorophenyl)sulfamoyl]cyclohex-1-ene-1-carboxylate (TAK-242), Selectively Inhibits Toll-Like Receptor 4-Mediated Cytokine Production through Suppression of Intracellular Signaling. Mol. Pharmacol. 2006, 69 (4), 1288. 10.1124/mol.105.019695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Yamada M.; Ichikawa T.; Ii M.; Sunamoto M.; Itoh K.; Tamura N.; Kitazaki T. Discovery of Novel and Potent Small-Molecule Inhibitors of NO and Cytokine Production as Antisepsis Agents: Synthesis and Biological Activity of Alkyl 6-(N-Substituted sulfamoyl)cyclohex-1-ene-1-carboxylate. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48 (23), 7457–7467. 10.1021/jm050623t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chang C. A.; Akinbobuyi B.; Quintana J. M.; Yoshimatsu G.; Naziruddin B.; Kane R. R. Ex-vivo generation of drug-eluting islets improves transplant outcomes by inhibiting TLR4-Mediated NFkB upregulation. Biomaterials 2018, 159, 13–24. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Plunk M. A.; Alaniz A.; Olademehin O. P.; Ellington T. L.; Shuford K. L.; Kane R. R. Design and Catalyzed Activation of TAK-242 Prodrugs for Localized Inhibition of TLR4-Induced Inflammation. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11 (2), 141–146. 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.9b00518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mele T. S.; Halloran P. F. The use of mycophenolate mofetil in transplant recipients. Immunopharmacology 2000, 47 (2), 215–245. 10.1016/S0162-3109(00)00190-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Allison A. C.; Eugui E. M. Mycophenolate mofetil and its mechanisms of action. Immunopharmacology 2000, 47 (2), 85–118. 10.1016/S0162-3109(00)00188-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lipsky J. J. Mycophenolate mofetil. Lancet 1996, 348 (9038), 1357–1359. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)10310-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee W. A.; Gu L.; Miksztal A. R.; Chu N.; Leung K.; Nelson P. H. Bioavailability Improvement of Mycophenolic Acid Through Amino Ester Derivatization. Pharm. Res. 1990, 7 (2), 161–166. 10.1023/A:1015828802490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang H.; Sobral M. C.; Snyder T.; Brudno Y.; Gorantla V. S.; Mooney D. J. Clickable, acid labile immunosuppressive prodrugs for in vivo targeting. Biomater. Sci. 2020, 8 (1), 266–277. 10.1039/C9BM01487J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Yusop R. M.; Unciti-Broceta A.; Johansson E. M. V.; Sánchez-Martín R. M.; Bradley M. Palladium-mediated intracellular chemistry. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 239. 10.1038/nchem.981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Unciti-Broceta A.; Johansson E. M. V.; Yusop R. M.; Sánchez-Martín R. M.; Bradley M. Synthesis of polystyrene microspheres and functionalization with Pd0 nanoparticles to perform bioorthogonal organometallic chemistry in living cells. Nat. Protoc. 2012, 7, 1207. 10.1038/nprot.2012.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pérez-López Ana M.; Rubio-Ruiz B.; Sebastián V.; Hamilton L.; Adam C.; Bray Thomas L.; Irusta S.; Brennan Paul M.; Lloyd-Jones Guy C.; Sieger D.; Santamaría J.; Unciti-Broceta A. Gold-Triggered Uncaging Chemistry in Living Systems. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56 (41), 12548–12552. 10.1002/anie.201705609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bray T. L.; Salji M.; Brombin A.; Pérez-López A. M.; Rubio-Ruiz B.; Galbraith L. C. A.; Patton E. E.; Leung H. Y.; Unciti-Broceta A. Bright insights into palladium-triggered local chemotherapy. Chemical Science 2018, 9 (37), 7354–7361. 10.1039/C8SC02291G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sagnou M. J.; Howard P. W.; Gregson S. J.; Eno-Amooquaye E.; Burke P. J.; Thurston D. E. Design and synthesis of novel pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) prodrugs for ADEPT and GDEPT. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10 (18), 2083–2086. 10.1016/S0960-894X(00)00404-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Deckert P. M.; Renner C.; Cohen L. S.; Jungbluth A.; Ritter G.; Bertino J. R.; Old L. J.; Welt S. A33scFv-cytosine deaminase: a recombinant protein construct for antibody-directed enzyme-prodrug therapy. Br. J. Cancer 2003, 88, 937. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Park J. I.; Cao L.; Platt V. M.; Huang Z.; Stull R. A.; Dy E. E.; Sperinde J. J.; Yokoyama J. S.; Szoka F. C. Antitumor Therapy Mediated by 5-Fluorocytosine and a Recombinant Fusion Protein Containing TSG-6 Hyaluronan Binding Domain and Yeast Cytosine Deaminase. Mol. Pharmaceutics 2009, 6 (3), 801–812. 10.1021/mp800013c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yang Y.-h.; Aloysius H.; Inoyama D.; Chen Y.; Hu L.-q. Enzyme-mediated hydrolytic activation of prodrugs. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2011, 1 (3), 143–159. 10.1016/j.apsb.2011.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Geresu M. Immunotherapy against cancer: A comprehensive review. 2016, 8, 15–25. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kucerova L.; Durinikova E.; Toro L.; Cihova M.; Miklikova S.; Poturnajova M.; Kozovska Z.; Matuskova M. Targeted antitumor therapy mediated by prodrug-activating mesenchymal stromal cells. Cancer Lett. 2017, 408, 1–9. 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Walther R.; Rautio J.; Zelikin A. N. Prodrugs in medicinal chemistry and enzyme prodrug therapies. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2017, 118, 65–77. 10.1016/j.addr.2017.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Weiss J. T.; Dawson J. C.; Macleod K. G.; Rybski W.; Fraser C.; Torres-Sánchez C.; Patton E. E.; Bradley M.; Carragher N. O.; Unciti-Broceta A. Extracellular palladium-catalysed dealkylation of 5-fluoro-1-propargyl-uracil as a bioorthogonally activated prodrug approach. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3277. 10.1038/ncomms4277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rubio-Ruiz B.; Weiss J. T.; Unciti-Broceta A. Efficient Palladium-Triggered Release of Vorinostat from a Bioorthogonal Precursor. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59 (21), 9974–9980. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Weiss J. T.; Dawson J. C.; Fraser C.; Rybski W.; Torres-Sánchez C.; Bradley M.; Patton E. E.; Carragher N. O.; Unciti-Broceta A. Development and Bioorthogonal Activation of Palladium-Labile Prodrugs of Gemcitabine. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57 (12), 5395–5404. 10.1021/jm500531z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Adam C.; Pérez-López A. M.; Hamilton L.; Rubio-Ruiz B.; Bray T. L.; Sieger D.; Brennan P. M.; Unciti-Broceta A. Bioorthogonal Uncaging of the Active Metabolite of Irinotecan by Palladium-Functionalized Microdevices. Chem. - Eur. J. 2018, 24 (63), 16783–16790. 10.1002/chem.201803725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Johansson E.; Parkinson G. N.; Denny W. A.; Neidle S. Studies on the Nitroreductase Prodrug-Activating System. Crystal Structures of Complexes with the Inhibitor Dicoumarol and Dinitrobenzamide Prodrugs and of the Enzyme Active Form. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46 (19), 4009–4020. 10.1021/jm030843b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yang Y.; Voak A.; Wilkinson S. R.; Hu L. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of potential prodrugs of DFMO for reductive activation. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22 (21), 6583–6586. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Bae J.; McNamara L. E.; Nael M. A.; Mahdi F.; Doerksen R. J.; Bidwell G. L.; Hammer N. I.; Jo S. Nitroreductase-triggered activation of a novel caged fluorescent probe obtained from methylene blue. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51 (64), 12787–12790. 10.1039/C5CC03824C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhai B.; Hu W.; Sun J.; Chi S.; Lei Y.; Zhang F.; Zhong C.; Liu Z. A two-photon fluorescent probe for nitroreductase imaging in living cells, tissues and zebrafish under hypoxia conditions. Analyst 2017, 142 (9), 1545–1553. 10.1039/C7AN00058H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ishihara H.; Asano T.; Tsukuda K.; Katagiri H.; Inukai K.; Anai M.; Kikuchi M.; Yazaki Y.; Miyazaki J. -I.; Oka Y., Pancreatic beta cell line MIN6 exhibits characteristics of glucose metabolism and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion similar to those of normal islets. (0012–186X (Print)).Diabetologia 1993361139. 10.1007/BF00401058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sanchez-Martin R. M.; Alexander L.; Muzerelle M.; Cardenas-Maestre J. M.; Tsakiridis A.; Brickman J. M.; Bradley M. Microsphere-Mediated Protein Delivery into Cells. ChemBioChem 2009, 10 (9), 1453–1456. 10.1002/cbic.200900136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Loukopoulos I.; Sfiniadakis I.; Pillai A.; Konstantoulakis M.; Androulakis G.; Bonatsos V.; Zografos G.; Papalois A. Mycophenolate Mofetil and Sirolimus in Hepatocyte Transplantation in an Experimental Model of Toxic Acute Liver Failure. Journal of Investigative Surgery 2014, 27 (4), 205–213. 10.3109/08941939.2013.879967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ml1c00079_si_001.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES