Correction to Reversible Control of Protein Corona Formation on Gold Nanoparticles Using Host–Guest Interactions

The scale bar for Figure 2D was incorrect. The image with a correct scale bar is presented below.

Figure S4.

Comparison of the amount of FBS immobilized on NS2 and NS-PEG particles, upon addition of cage A. Two different gels are shown. Lane 1: 200 μL of NS2 (7.5 × 10¹¹ particles/mL) diluted in FBS (5% in PBS) after 30 min of incubation. Lane 2: Same conditions as in lane 1 but using 2 μM of cage A during incubation with FBS. Lane 3: Same conditions as in lane 1 but using 5 μM of cage A during incubation with FBS. Lane 4: Same conditions as in lane 1 but using 10 μM of cage A during incubation with FBS. Lane 5: 200 μL of NS-PEG (7.5 × 10¹¹ particles/mL) diluted in FBS (5% in PBS) after 30 min of incubation. Lane 6: Same conditions as in lane 5 but using 10 μM of cage A during incubation with FBS. Lane 7: Same conditions as in lane 1. Lane 8: Same conditions as in lane 4. Lane 9: Same conditions as in lane 7 but using 20 μM of cage A during incubation with FBS. Lane 10: Same conditions as in lane 7 but using 50 μM of cage A during incubation with FBS. The amount of protein was quantified using ImageJ (for each entire lane) and normalized against the result for lane 1 in the first gel and for lane 7 in the second gel. Lane 1 (100%); lane 2 (71%); lane 3 (50%); lane 4 (37%); lane 5 (108%); lane 6 (112%); lane 7 (100%); lane 8 (39%); lane 9 (23%); lane 10 (10%).

None of these changes affects the conclusions or main findings of the article. We apologize for any confusion over these errors.