Based on neutron spin-echo (NSE), solid-state NMR, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we report clear evidence that cholesterol stiffens 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC) membranes (1). Contrary to statements by Nagle et al. (2), the relaxations measured by NSE and NMR directly relate to elastic membrane constants (3, 4). While both NSE and NMR spectroscopy measure the time-averaged 𝜏-decay, , the data analysis methods separate the mean-square amplitude (MSA) from membrane dynamics, providing information about equilibrium and dynamical bilayer properties (4). In the case of isotropic systems (simplest case), the and the time average is zero. However, for ordered systems such as lipid bilayers, the time average is nonzero [i.e., ], and consequently the MSA = (4). Hence, the time interval becomes crucial to interpreting both spectroscopic and scattering experiments.
If only local motions are considered, the MSA corresponds to the segmental order parameter averaged over local degrees of freedom (DOFs). For hierarchical dynamics captured by NMR relaxometry and NSE, the MSA for the most rapid motions depends on the residual interaction that remains from averaging the local DOF. The residual DOFs then yield the MSAs for the next slower motions, and so on until the limit of isotropic averaging is reached (4). In NMR spectroscopy, equipartition among a continuum of first-order relaxation modes gives a characteristic ν–1/2 frequency signature scaled by , in agreement with collective lipid dynamics (5, 6). This square-law dependence is a direct manifestation of Fermi’s golden rule (4). Furthermore, by describing collective order-director fluctuations with a single elastic constant approximation, a direct connection to the Helfrich bending energy can be made (7). These concepts have been clearly validated in NMR studies of 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC) membranes containing cholesterol (6, 7). A model-free comparison between DMPC-cholesterol data and the DOPC-cholesterol series in ref. 1 shows the same trends in spectral relaxations associated with increased bending rigidity caused by cholesterol.
Correspondingly, in NSE the dynamics are measured as motional correlations embedded in the intermediate scattering function , the Fourier transform of the van Hove correlation function. The motional correlations as a function of Fourier time t allow for the separation of relaxation timescales from material properties by , where Γ is the time-independent (but q-dependent) relaxation rate. For bending fluctuations, the relaxation rates are directly linked to the Helfrich bending elasticity through the Zilman–Granek theory (3), contrary to assertions by Nagle et al. (2). Model-free observations of slower NSE decays, as detected for DOPC-cholesterol membranes, are typically associated with bilayer stiffening. While alternative interpretations are possible, our conclusions are based on well-accepted NSE data analysis methods (8, 9). Importantly, our results are consistent with recent NSE observations showing that elastic membrane properties, including bending rigidity κ, scale with molecular packing (10). We also note that the use of a modified polymer brush model—with redefined mechanical thickness—to relate κ to the area compressibility modulus has been validated by MD simulations of saturated and unsaturated membranes containing cholesterol (11), a point ignored in ref. 2. From our independent NSE, NMR, and MD simulation results, a universal stiffening effect of cholesterol on lipid membranes is inferred.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing interest.
References
- 1.Chakraborty S., et al., How cholesterol stiffens unsaturated lipid membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 21896–21905 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nagle J. F., et al., A needless but interesting controversy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 10.1073/pnas.2025011118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zilman A. G., Granek R., Undulations and dynamic structure factor of membranes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4788–4791 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brown M. F., Theory of spin‐lattice relaxation in lipid bilayers and biological membranes. 2H and 14N quadrupolar relaxation. J. Chem. Phys. 77, 1576–1599 (1982). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Trouard T. P., Alam T. M., Brown M. F., Angular dependence of deuterium spin‐lattice relaxation rates of macroscopically oriented dilauroylphosphatidylcholine in the liquid‐crystalline state. J. Chem. Phys. 101, 5229–5261 (1994). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Martinez G. V., Dykstra E. M., Lope-Piedrafita S., Job C., Brown M. F., NMR elastometry of fluid membranes in the mesoscopic regime. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 66, 050902 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brown M. F., Thurmond R. L., Dodd S. W., Otten D., Beyer K., Composite membrane deformation on the mesoscopic length scale. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 64, 010901 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Watson M. C., Brown F. L. H., Interpreting membrane scattering experiments at the mesoscale: The contribution of dissipation within the bilayer. Biophys. J. 98, L9–L11 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nagao M., Kelley E. G., Ashkar R., Bradbury R., Butler P. D., Probing elastic and viscous properties of phospholipid bilayers using neutron spin echo spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 4679–4684 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kelley E. G., Butler P. D., Ashkar R., Bradbury R., Nagao M., Scaling relationships for the elastic moduli and viscosity of mixed lipid membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 23365–23373 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Doktorova M., LeVine M. V., Khelashvili G., Weinstein H., A new computational method for membrane compressibility: Bilayer mechanical thickness revisited. Biophys. J. 116, 487–502 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
