Skip to main content
Nucleus logoLink to Nucleus
. 2021 May 25;12(1):82–89. doi: 10.1080/19491034.2021.1930681

In vitro assembly of nuclear envelope in tobacco cultured cells

Kentaro Tamura a,, Haruko Ueda b, Ikuko Hara-Nishimura b
PMCID: PMC8158034  PMID: 34030583

ABSTRACT

The coordinated regulation of the nucelar envelope (NE) reassembly during cell division is an essential event. However, there is little information on the molecular components involved in NE assembly in plant cells. Here we developed an in vitro assay of NE assembly using tobacco BY-2 cultured cells. To start the NE assembly reaction, the demembranated nuclei and the S12 fraction (cytosol and microsomes) were mixed in the presence of GTP and ATP nucleotides. Time–course analysis indicated that tubule structures were extended from the microsomal vesicles that accumulated on the demembranated nuclei, and finally sealed the NE. Immunofluorescence confirmed that the assembled membrane contains a component of nuclear pore complex. The efficiency of the NE assembly is significantly inhibited by GTPγS that suppresses membrane fusion. This in-vitro assay system may elucidate the role of specific proteins and provide important insights into the molecular machinery of NE assembly in plant cells.

KEYWORDS: BY-2, nuclear envelope, nucleus, endoplasmic reticulum, confocal microscopy

Introduction

The nuclear envelope (NE) provides a selective barrier that separates the functional and structural systems of a nucleus from the rest of the cell. It consists of a double membrane, nuclear pore complex (NPC), and nuclear lamina. The outer nuclear membrane forms a continuous membrane system with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), whereas the inner nuclear membrane (INM) is closely associated with the chromatin and nuclear lamina. During the cell cycle, in plants and animals, the NE typically breaks down at prophase, which allows for open mitosis. At telophase, the NE components reassemble to reestablish the nuclear boundary. The coordinated regulation of the NE reassembly is essential to correct cell functioning [1]. Live cell imaging has demonstrated the dynamic features of plant NE proteins during NE reformation of mitosis in tobacco cultured cells [2,3]. After NE breakdown, INM proteins, SUN1 and SUN2 disperse into the ER membrane and accumulate at the spindle. At telophase, they relocate to the chromatin surface-facing spindle pores and subsequently accumulate at the distal and proximal surface of the chromatin to seal the NE. Other NE proteins, including WIP [4], NMCP [5], and RanGAP [6], were also investigated in terms of their localization during mitosis. However, little is known about the molecular components involved in the NE assembly in plant cells.

In vitro NE assembly assays have been well-established using cell-free extracts derived from Xenopus laevis eggs [7–11]. The egg extract contains a high concentration of proteins and factors required for in vitro nuclei assembly [12]. It leads to extensive membrane fusion events, resulting in NE formation around the sperm chromatin. This assay system has contributed to the independent studies of the individual steps in the assembly mechanism that occur during nuclear formation [12]. For example, it has been demonstrated that an intact tubule ER network is required for NE formation and expansion at the end of mitosis [13,14]. The membrane targeting to chromatin is partially regulated by NE-specific transmembrane proteins that have long basic domains that potentially bind to chromatin [13,15]. The assays have also been widely used to study nuclear transport [16–18], nuclear membrane and NPC assembly [14,19], nuclear breakdown at mitosis [10,20], and many other aspects.

In addition to the X. laevis egg system, cell-free NE assembly have been reported in several species, including sea urchins [21], Drosophila, [22] and humans [23]. Lu and Zhai developed a heterogeneous NE assembly system using demembranated X. laevis sperm and extracts from Nicotiana tabacum ovules [24]. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying plant NE assembly. Since in vitro nuclei assembly is comparable to in vivo nuclei assembly in fundamental architecture, the cell-free assay is a powerful system to elucidate molecular mechanisms that regulate NE formation. In this study, we have developed a novel assay of plant NE assembly using tobacco BY-2 cultured cells. We also revealed that a membrane fusion inhibitor, GTPγS, suppresses the closing of the NE, suggesting that ER membrane fusion plays an important role in the NE assembly in plants.

Materials and methods

Tobacco cultured BY-2 cells

Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) cultured BY-2 cells were maintained as described previously [25]. Transgenic BY-2 cells, which stably express ER lumen-targeted GFP, were previously generated [25]. The ER lumen-targeted GFP was composed of signal peptide of pumpkin 2S albumin and GFP followed by an ER-retention signal, HDEL.

Isolation of nuclei from BY-2 cells

Nuclei from BY-2 cells were isolated as described previously with minor modifications [26]. BY-2 cells (5 day old) from 50 ml culture were collected by centrifugation at 1,500 xg for 2 minutes and were suspended in 50 ml Cellulase enzyme solution (1% Cellulase ONOZUKA RS, 0.1% pectolyase Y-23, 0.3 M mannitol, 23.4 mM MES-KOH [pH5.7]). The cells were incubated with gentle shaking at 26°C for 4 hours to obtain protoplasts. The protoplasts were filtrated through a 125 µm nylon filter and then centrifuged at 1,000 xg for 3 min at 4°C. The pellet of protoplasts was suspended in 15 ml buffer A (0.44 M sucrose, 2.5% ficoll, 5.0% dextran40, 25 mM Tris-HCl [pH8.0], 10 mM MgCl2, 3 mM CaCl2, 0.01% Triton X-100, 2.5 mM DTT) and homogenized with a glass homogenizer on ice. The homogenate was filtrated through 80 µm nylon filters to remove cell debris. The solution passed through the filters was centrifuged at 1500 xg for 10 minutes at 4°C. The pellet was re-suspended in 10 ml 2.3 M sucrose buffer (2.3 M sucrose, 3 mM CaCl2, 10 mM MgCl2, 25 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 0.01% TritonX-100) and centrifuged at 65,000 xg for 45 minutes at 4°C. The pellet was re-suspended in buffer A and used as “isolated nuclei’.

An NE formation assay

The isolated nuclei mentioned above were treated with 2% Triton X-100 for 30 min to remove nuclear membrane on ice. The nuclei were washed with buffer B (40 mM PIPES-KOH [pH 7.0], 8 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM MnCl2, 0.3 M sucrose, 0.5% casein, 2 mM DTT, 2 mM PMSF, 0.2 mg/ml leupeptin) and stained with 5 µM of FM4-64 (Invitrogen) for 10 min at room temperature to confirm whether the nuclei were demembranated. The S12 fraction containing microsomal and cytosolic fraction was isolated according to Yokota et al with minor modifications [27]. Protoplast prepared from 30 ml of BY-2 cells (5 day old) were homogenized in buffer B by passing through a syringe with a 27 G needle. The homogenates were centrifuged at 2,000 xg for 4 min at 4°C to remove cellular debris. The supernatants were further centrifuged at 12,000 g for 6 min at 4°C to obtain the S12 fraction. The S12 fraction was premixed with ATP and GTP (final concentrations 3 mM) solution. For inhibition assay, GTPγS (final concentration 3 mM) was added instead of GTP. The demembranated nuclei were added to the mixture to start the NE formation assay on glass slides at room temperature. The nuclei were stained with 1 µg/ml Hoechst 33342. Immunostaining of nuclei with anti-Nup43 antibody [28] was performed as described previously [29]. Fluorescent images were randomly captured at each time point by a confocal laser-scanning microscope (LSM510 META and LSM800) with a 40 × 0.95 N.A. dry objective (Plan-Apochromat, 440654–9902-000, Carl Zeiss) or 20 × 0.8 N.A. dry objective (Plan-Apochromat, 440640–9903-000, Carl Zeiss). We defined ‘nuclei with NE closure’ as a nuclear membrane signal that occupies more than 90% of perimeter of chromatin. In Figure 3(d), we quantified membrane region labeled by GFP of each nucleus (n > 20) and counted nuclei with NE closure. The number of technical replicate is 4 at each time point. Data were processed using ImageJ/Fiji. Three-dimensional (3D) image reconstruction was performed through volume rendering in arivis Vision4D software (Zeiss).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

GTP- and ATP-dependent NE assembly. (a–c) Representative fluorescence images of the NE assembly assay in the presence of nucleotides, as indicated in each panel. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (magenta), and the S12 fraction was stained with ER-targeted GFP (green). Bars, 5 µm. (d) The percentage of nuclei with NE closure. Each box is bounded by the lower and upper quartiles, the central bar represents the median, the whiskers indicate minimum and maximum values, and beeswarm plots indicate individual data points (technical replicates). The numbers of individual biological experiments are n > 20

Results and discussion

Preparation of demembranated nuclei and cell-free extracts from tobacco BY-2 cultured cells

To establish the in vitro NE assembly assay in plants, we isolated nuclei and cell-free extracts (S12 fraction) from tobacco BY-2 cultured cells (Figure 1(a)). Intact nuclei were purified from the cells using a buffer containing a high sucrose concentration [26]. Staining with Hoechst 33342 (a DNA specific dye) and FM4-64 (a membrane specific dye) [30] confirmed that the isolated nuclei have intact nuclear membranes (Figure 1(b)). For the NE assembly assay, nuclei were demembranated with 2% TritonX-100 (a nonionic detergent), resulting in the obliteration of the FM4-64 signal (Figure 1(c)). Demembranation had no effect on nuclear morphology, suggesting that the nuclear matrix remains structurally intact for chromatin organization.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Preparation of demembranated nuclei and S12 fraction from tobacco BY-2 cultured cells. (a) Nuclei were isolated from wild-type tobacco cultured cells and demembranated using Triton X-100. The S12 fraction was isolated from transgenic tobacco cultured cells expressing ER-targeted GFP. The reaction was started by mixing the demembranated nuclei, S12 fraction, GTP, and ATP. The NE assembly was analyzed through confocal microscopy. (b, c) Fluorescence images of isolated nuclei before (b) and after (c) treatment with Triton X-100. Chromatin and nuclear membrane were visualized through Hoechst 33342 and FM4-64 staining, respectively. DIC: differential interference contrast. Bars: 5 µm. (d, e) Fluorescence images of the S12 fraction, which were visualized using ER-targeted GFP, and incubation without (d) and with (e) GTP and ATP. DIC: differential interference contrast. Bars: 5 µm

Previously, it has been demonstrated that the S12 fraction of tobacco and Arabidopsis cultured cells reconstitutes the ER network in vitro [27]. Therefore, we used the S12 fraction as the cell-free extract for in vitro NE assembly. The S12 fraction is a subcellular fraction that is rich in microsomes and cytosol, including two classes of myosin XI, which is responsible for ER tubule formation [27]. We prepared the S12 fraction from transgenic tobacco BY-2 cells expressing ER lumen-targeted GFP to visualize NE formation during the assay. During cell fractionation, the fragile ER network was fragmented, resulting in the production of small fluorescent structures with varying sizes and shapes (Figure 1(d)). We confirmed that the S12 fraction was able to form ER tubules and sheets upon ATP and GTP treatment for 30 min on glass slides (Figure 1(e)), which is consistent with previous reports [31]. This result suggests that the S12 fraction from the transgenic tobacco cells is capable of NE reconstitution.

An in vitroNE assembly assay

To start forming the NE, the demembranated nuclei and S12 fraction were mixed with GTP and ATP (Figure 2(a); see Materials and Methods). We observed that small vesicles labeled by ER lumen-targeted GFP were attached to the nuclear periphery after 5 min of incubation (Figure 2(b)). After 15 min, tubule structures were extended from vesicles, and these structures covered the surface of the demembranated nuclei (Figure 2(c)). Membrane closing was completed after 45 min (Figure 2(d)). The excess nuclear membrane formed bleb-like structures (Figure 2(d), arrows). To visualize dynamics of NE formation on the chromatin, the optical sectioning images were assembled into three-dimensional (3D) constructions (Figure 2(e–h)). The 3D volumetric rendering images shows that membrane vesicles and tubules were attached with chromatin surface at an early stage (Figure 2(f), arrows). Subsequently, the membrane was grown to produce sheet-like structures (Figure 2(g)) and nuclear membrane (Figure 2(h)). These results suggest that in vitro NE assembly is composed of two steps, namely, vesicle accumulation around the nuclei and subsequent tubule and sheet formation. Immunofluorescence with anti-Nup43 antibody (a marker for NPC) showed that assembled membrane contains NPC (Figure 2(i,j)). Similar results have been obtained by in vitro NE assembly using X. laevis [32–34] and Drosophila [22] extracts. Membrane vesicles were first recruited to the periphery of chromatin in a cytosol-independent manner. The vesicles on the chromatin fused to generate tubules and small cisternae on the chromatin surface [34–36]. This fusion event requires soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF) attachment protein receptor proteins and Ran GTPase. The tubules and cisternae subsequently laterally extended to produce larger cisternae and cover the entire chromatin surface, thereby sealing the envelope. Taken together, these results suggest that plant NE formation also requires vesicle fusion on the chromatin to generate tubules.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Time–course analysis of NE assembly. (a–d) Representative fluorescence images of the NE assembly assay at each time point. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (magenta), and the S12 fraction was stained with ER-targeted GFP (green). White arrows (d) indicate bleb-like structures. Bars, 5 µm. (e–h) 3D volumetric rendering images of NE assembly at each time point. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (magenta), and the S12 fraction was stained with ER-targeted GFP (green). Red arrows (f) indicate membranes associated with chromatin. Bars, 2 µm. (i, j) Representative fluorescence images of the NE assembly assay at each time point. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (magenta), and the nuclear envelop was stained with anti-Nup43 antibody (cyan). Bars, 5 µm

An Inhibitory effect of GTPγS on the NE assembly

We next examined the effects of GTP and ATP on NE assembly in our proposed system. In control experiments containing both GTP and ATP, tubule structures were formed after 15 min, and NE closure (see Materials and methods) occurred in 93.5 ± 3.86% (median ± standard deviation) of nuclei after 45 min of incubation (Figure 3(a,d)). When the reaction was started without ATP, vesicles accumulated on the demembranated nuclei, similar to the control group. However, tubule formation was inhibited after 15 min, compared with the control, leading to a reduction in the closed NE ratio at 45 min (61 ± 6.65%) (Figure 3(b,d)). We also found that a non-hydrolyzable GTP analog (GTPγS) significantly inhibited NE formation (Figure 3(c)). There was no NE formation observed (Figure 3(c,d)), although small vesicles accumulated on the demembranated nuclei surface at 45 min. These results suggest that vesicle accumulation on the demembranated nuclei is independent of GTP and ATP, whereas tubule formation from the vesicles and subsequent efficient NE formation required both GTP and ATP.

The fusion of separated membrane vesicles and fragmented ER require several GTPase proteins in eukaryotic cells [37]. In plant cells, it has been reported that ER tubule formation requires both GTP and ATP and is significantly inhibited by GTPγS in vitro [27,31,38]. The activity of GTP hydrolysis was highly induced during ER tubule formation in vitro [27]. These results suggest that the inhibition of NE formation by either no ATP or GTPγS was due to a block in reconstituting the tubule network from fragmented ER membranes. Consistent with this finding, it has also been reported that GTPγS and ATPγS efficiently blocked NE formation with a fragmented membrane in an X. laevis cell-free system [35], suggesting the evolutionally conserved NE formation system. In tobacco cultured cells, two groups investigated NE reformation during cell division with fluorescent-tagged SUN proteins [2,3]. At telophase, SUN proteins were reassembled at the distal side of nuclei and expanded to the proximal side. Such a polar localization of membrane reformation was not observed in our in vitro system. This difference could be caused by the fact that demembranated nuclei were isolated from non-mitotic cells. Further examination will be required to reveal the physiological significance of the polar NE reformation.

In this study, we elucidated the in vitro NE assembly system in plants. Unlike previous work [24,39], this system produces ‘pure’ plant nuclei, but not ‘hybrid’ nuclei, that are made from animal (X. laevis) and plant (Tobacco and Orychophragmus) extracts. The tobacco cultured cells used in this study have a number of advantageous features. First, cells grow fast, making it possible to purify large amounts of cell-free extracts (S12 fraction) and nuclei. Second, several fluorescent marker lines have been generated to visualize membrane dynamics. Third, the cell cycles can be highly synchronized [40], allowing extracts of various cell cycle stages to be prepared. In vivo studies of NE assembly in plants are usually limited because NE reconstitution is an essential event for viability during cell cycle. It is expected that in vitro NE assembly can generate “biochemically mutant nuclei“ by immunodepletion of specific NE proteins from the reaction to assess the function of each component. The in vitro system will provide important insights that help to understand better the molecular machinery of NE assembly in plant cells.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English language review.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research to K.T. (nos. 26711017 and 18K06283), by a ‘Specially Promoted Research’ Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research to I.H-N. (nos. 22000014 and 15H05776), by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research to H.U. (no. 19K06732) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS); by the Human Frontier Science Program to K.T. (RGP0009/2018) from the International Human Frontier Science Program Organization; and by the Hirao Taro Foundation of KONAN GAKUEN for Academic Research to I.H.-N.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Abbreviations

ER: endoplasmic reticulum; INM: inner nuclear membrane; ONM: outer nuclear membrane; NE: nuclear envelope; NPCs: nuclear pore complex(es)

References

  • [1].Larijani B, Poccia DL.. Nuclear envelope formation: mind the gaps. Annu Rev Biophys. 2009;38:107–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Graumann K, Evans DE. Nuclear envelope dynamics during plant cell division suggest common mechanisms between kingdoms. Biochem J. 2011;435:661–667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Oda Y, Fukuda H. Dynamics of Arabidopsis SUN proteins during mitosis and their involvement in nuclear shaping. Plant J. 2011;66:629–641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Xu XM, Rose A, Meier I. NUA activities at the plant nuclear pore. Plant Signal Behav. 2007;2:553–555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Kimura Y, Kuroda C, Masuda K. Differential nuclear envelope assembly at the end of mitosis in suspension-cultured Apium graveolens cells. Chromosoma. 2010;119:195–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Xu XM, Zhao Q, Rodrigo-Peiris T, et al. RanGAP1 is a continuous marker of the Arabidopsis cell division plane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:18637–18642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Forbes DJ, Kirschner MW, Newport JW. Spontaneous formation of nucleus-like structures around bacteriophage DNA microinjected into Xenopus eggs. Cell. 1983;34:13–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Lohka MJ, Masui Y. Formation in vitro of sperm pronuclei and mitotic chromosomes induced by amphibian ooplasmic components. Science. 1983;220:719–721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Hartl P, Olson E, Dang T, et al. Nuclear assembly with lambda DNA in fractionated Xenopus egg extracts: an unexpected role for glycogen in formation of a higher order chromatin intermediate. J Cell Biol. 1994;124:235–248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Newport J, Spann T. Disassembly of the nucleus in mitotic extracts: membrane vesicularization, lamin disassembly, and chromosome condensation are independent processes. Cell. 1987;48:219–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Wilson KL, Newport J. A trypsin-sensitive receptor on membrane vesicles is required for nuclear envelope formation in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1988;107:57–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Bernis C, Forbes DJ. Analysis of nuclear reconstitution, nuclear envelope assembly, and nuclear pore assembly using Xenopus in vitro assays. Methods Cell Biol. 2014;122:165–191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Kutay U, Hetzer MW. Reorganization of the nuclear envelope during open mitosis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20:669–677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Anderson DJ, Hetzer MW. Nuclear envelope formation by chromatin-mediated reorganization of the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:1160–1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Ulbert S, Platani M, Boue S, et al. Direct membrane protein-DNA interactions required early in nuclear envelope assembly. J Cell Biol. 2006;173:469–476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Chan RC, Forbes DI. In vitro study of nuclear assembly and nuclear import using Xenopus egg extracts. Methods Mol Biol. 2006;322:289–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Lachish-Zalait A, Lau CK, Fichtman B, et al. Transportin mediates nuclear entry of DNA in vertebrate systems. Traffic. 2009;10:1414–1428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Savulescu AF, Shorer H, Kleifeld O, et al. Nuclear import of an intact preassembled proteasome particle. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22:880–891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Fichtman B, Ramos C, Rasala B, et al. Inner/Outer nuclear membrane fusion in nuclear pore assembly: biochemical demonstration and molecular analysis. Mol Biol Cell. 2010;21:4197–4211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Galy V, Antonin W, Jaedicke A, et al. A role for gp210 in mitotic nuclear-envelope breakdown. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:317–328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Collas P. Formation of the sea urchin male pronucleus in cell-free extracts. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000;56:265–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Ulitzur N, Harel A, Goldberg M, et al. Nuclear membrane vesicle targeting to chromatin in a Drosophila embryo cell-free system. Mol Biol Cell. 1997;8:1439–1448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Burke B, Gerace L. A cell free system to study reassembly of the nuclear envelope at the end of mitosis. Cell. 1986;44:639–652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Lu P, Zhai ZH. Nuclear assembly of demembranated Xenopus sperm in plant cell-free extracts from Nicotiana ovules. Exp Cell Res. 2001;270:96–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Mitsuhashi N, Shimada T, Mano S, et al. Characterization of organelles in the vacuolar-sorting pathway by visualization with GFP in tobacco BY-2 cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000;41:993–1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Goto C, Tamura K, Nishimaki S, et al. KAKU4 determines the migration order of the vegetative nucleus and sperm cells in pollen tubes. J Exp Bot. 2020;71(20):6273–6281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Yokota E, Ueda H, Hashimoto K, et al. Myosin XI-dependent formation of tubular structures from endoplasmic reticulum isolated from tobacco cultured BY-2 cells. Plant Physiol. 2011;156:129–143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Goto C, Hashizume S, Fukao Y, et al. Comprehensive nuclear proteome of Arabidopsis obtained by sequential extraction. Nucleus. 2019;10:81–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Tamura K, Takahashi H, Kunieda T, et al. Arabidopsis KAM2/GRV2 is required for proper endosome formation and functions in vacuolar sorting and determination of the embryo growth axis. Plant Cell. 2007;19:320–332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Zal T, Zal MA, Lotz C, et al. Spectral shift of fluorescent dye FM4-64 reveals distinct microenvironment of nuclear envelope in living cells. Traffic. 2006;7:1607–1613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Ueda H, Yokota E, Kuwata K, et al. Phosphorylation of the C terminus of RHD3 has a critical role in homotypic ER membrane fusion in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2016;170:867–880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Lohka MJ. Analysis of nuclear envelope assembly using extracts of Xenopus eggs. Methods Cell Biol. 1998;53:367–395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Newport J, Dunphy W. Characterization of the membrane binding and fusion events during nuclear envelope assembly using purified components. J Cell Biol. 1992;116:295–306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Baur T, Ramadan K, Schlundt A, et al. NSF- and SNARE-mediated membrane fusion is required for nuclear envelope formation and completion of nuclear pore complex assembly in Xenopus laevis egg extracts. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:2895–2903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Dreier L, Rapoport TA. In vitro formation of the endoplasmic reticulum occurs independently of microtubules by a controlled fusion reaction. J Cell Biol. 2000;148:883–898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Hetzer M, Bilbao-Cortes D, Walther TC, et al. GTP hydrolysis by Ran is required for nuclear envelope assembly. Mol Cell. 2000;5:1013–1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].McNew JA, Sondermann H, Lee T, et al. GTP-dependent membrane fusion. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2013;29:529–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Yokota E, Ueda S, Tamura K, et al. An isoform of myosin XI is responsible for the translocation of endoplasmic reticulum in tobacco cultured BY-2 cells. J Exp Bot. 2009;60:197–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Lu P, Ren M, Zhai ZH. Nuclear reconstitution of plant (Orychophragmus violaceus) demembranated sperm in cell-free extracts from animal (Xenopus laevis) eggs. J Struct Biol. 2001;136:89–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Kumagai-Sano F, Hayashi T, Sano T, et al. Cell cycle synchronization of tobacco BY-2 cells. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:2621–2627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleus are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES