ABSTRACT
Given the well-documented inequities in health care outcomes by race, ethnicity, and gender, many health career pipeline programs have focused on supporting the development of a diverse and inclusive workforce. The State of Utah, is vast, but sparsely populated outside the Salt Lake City metropolitan area. More than 96% of our nearly 85,000 square miles is designated rural (<100 people/square mile) or frontier (<7 people/square mile). The Salt Lake City area is home to the Hunsman Cancer Institute, the only NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center in the region, also noted the limited diversity in the biomedical cancer research workforce. Our primary objective was to increase the number of underrepresented trainees who pursue higher education with the goal of a career in cancer research. PathMaker is a regional, competitive pipeline program that nurtures high school or undergraduate trainees from historically underrepresented backgrounds towards a career in cancer research. Our faculty and staff team collaboratively developed a cohort model curriculum that increased student awareness of research career options; provided academic and professional development, cultural and social support, evolutionary success strategies, active mentorship, and leadership skill development; and fostered an environment of continuous evaluation and improvement. Since pilot program initiation in May 2016, the PathMaker Research Program (PathMaker) has engaged a total of 44 underrepresented trainees in cancer research labs at Huntsman Cancer Institute, the majority still in college. Eleven trainees graduated college: five employed in STEM, one pursuing a PhD in STEM; two in medical school, and three are lost to follow-up. Alumni report high levels of satisfaction with PathMaker and will be followed and supported for academic success. PathMaker is a replicable model to increase diversity and inclusion in the biomedical cancer research workforce.
KEYWORDS: Pipeline program, health equity, partnership, health care career, underrepresented trainees
Introduction
The drop in historically underrepresented students (HUS) on the path towards becoming independent scientists has been well-documented [1,2]. In 2010, Latinx, Black, and American Indian persons represented more than a third of the population in the USA [3]. Doctorate degree recipients generally serve as the entry point for independent investigators into the biomedical research workforce. In 2010, the number of PhD recipients in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields to persons who identify as Latinx and Black was approximately 7% [4]. (The authors acknowledge the use of varying terms, i.e., Hispanic, Latino/a, or Latinx. Our cohort students and trainees with this identity expressed a preference for the term Latinx; therefore, Latinx is used throughout the manuscript).
The Mountain West region, the catchment area for Huntsman Cancer Institute (HCI), encompasses the five-state area of Utah, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, and Nevada and includes federally recognized American Indian Nations, rural and frontier populations, and an increasingly diverse population[5]. For example, Utah is home to a growing Latinx population (approximating 450,000, 14.2%), part of the Navajo Nation (the largest Indian reservation in the USA), and the highest percentage of Pacific Islanders in any state outside of Hawaii[6]. More than 60,000 refugees reside in Utah[7]. With the addition of other immigrant populations, over 120 languages are spoken in the state[8].
Programs to enhance the diversity of the clinical health care and research workforce [9–14] may begin as early as middle school and include academic and summer research opportunities. These summer academic and research skill development experiences [15] have been associated with increased STEM PhD program enrollment. For greatest impact, career opportunity awareness sessions, mentorship experiences, time for reflection, and leadership development [16,17] experiences can supplement and support the educational experience.
The PathMaker Research Program (PathMaker) seeks to increase the number HUS pursuing biomedical cancer research. It was our hypothesis that a residential research experience in a supportive environment that included co-curricular experiences and ongoing engagement and support would be most likely to yield success. Co-curricular experiences included cultural and social support, mentorship, and leadership skill development. Our collaboratively developed multi-faceted cohort curriculum (Please see Table 1) supports trainees during the transition from high school to college through specific outcomes. PathMaker is funded by a Supplement to the Cancer Center Support Grant (3P30CA042014-27S6) and receives the highest level of support from HCI. PathMaker leadership includes a senior HCI faculty leader as Program Director, a Program Coordinator, and a broad-based advisory committee that supports Cancer Training and Career Enhancement programs at HCI. The success of the PathMaker experience has resulted in a successful R25 application (1R25CA240171-01).
Table 1.
Goal | Method | Outcomes |
---|---|---|
Increase awareness, knowledge, and interest in pursuing education towards a career in biomed ca research | ResearchExperiences:
|
|
Increase the capacity of trainees underrepresented in biomedical cancer research | Developmental Experiences:
|
This paper outlines the program components, presents five-year outcomes and lessons learned, and addresses future considerations to support the success of HUS entering careers in biomedical cancer research.
Methods
Program description
PathMaker is a residential summer program based at HCI, University of Utah Health (UUH). Initially funded as a one-year pilot program through the Office of Health Equity and Inclusion (UUH), extramural competitive funding was successfully achieved for the subsequent years through the National Cancer Institute’s Continuing Umbrella of Research Experiences (CURE) Supplement. PathMaker focuses on the transition between high school and college and provides incoming HUS (high school seniors and undergraduates) with an enriching cancer research experience; academic, professional, cultural, and social support; mentorship; and leadership skill development. Social support includes extensive peer networking and family engagement.
Recruitment: PathMaker uses email, web, social media (Facebook and Twitter), and engagement with diversity-focused organizations to recruit trainees from high schools and colleges in the Mountain West. Word of mouth referrals by prior participants and community partners has also contributed to successful recruitment. Regional recruitment includes outreach through an existing extramurally funded regional partnership, the Geographic Management of Cancer Health Disparities Program (GMaP, 3P30CA042014-26S3). PathMaker also partners with diversity focused organizations that support HUS’s success in higher education. These included regional university organizations: TRiO and Upward Bound Programs, Latinos in Action, and the Black Student Union; university chapters of the Society for the Advancement of Chicanos and American Indians in Science (SACNAS); and the Utah State Board of Education Title VI: American Indian Education Program. High school outreach engaged high school advisors, educators, and every high school principal in the state.
Application and selection process: Applicants must have completed their junior year of high school prior to participating in the program and must demonstrate an interest in health sciences. Completed applications include demographic factors: race/ethnicity, self-identified gender, age, current school, home zip code, and parents’ educational attainment. Applicants submit a 1–2 page personal statement, copy of their most recent transcript, and two letters of recommendation. Letters of recommendations may be from an employer, tribal leader, or mentor, and from a teacher. A copy of the most recent tax return is required if the student seeks consideration based on economic disadvantage. All application materials are submitted electronically to the PathMaker Program Coordinator. Incomplete applications are not reviewed.
All applications are reviewed by the PathMaker Selection Committee. The PathMaker Selection Committee is diverse and inclusive of Black, Latinx, American Indian, Pacific Islander, LGBTQIA+, Asian, and non-Latinx, white members and represent multiple stakeholders across UUH. Members review and score each application using a standard scoring sheet. Review criteria include academic accomplishments; HUS identity; economic, social, or educational disadvantage; personal statement; and letters of recommendation. After all scores are entered, compiled and averaged, the selection committee meets to discuss and review the top-ranking applicants. In general, eight trainees are selected with three alternates.
Student Peer Mentors: The Selection Committee also reviews applications for Student Peer Mentors (SPMs). Two SPMs are hired each year. The SPMs live with the PathMaker trainees in residential housing on-campus. As SPMs they serve as residential advisors, facilitators, and overall guides to the undergraduate experience. SPMs are generally senior level undergraduate students at the UU who have previously lived on campus as a residential advisor. SPMs complete the UU Youth Protection Training course prior to the PathMaker trainees’ arrival on campus. The SPMs work closely with the PathMaker Program Coordinator to manage all day-to-day aspects of the experience. They attend all educational activities with the cohort.
Mentors: PathMaker mentors are HCI investigators whose research focuses on cancer aspects related to the basic, clinical, or population sciences. HCI principal investigators (PIs) are invited to participate as a mentor for PathMaker. Mentors are invited to a Mentor Orientation prior to the start of the PathMaker residential experience. Throughout the program, there is close communication between the Program Director, the Program Coordinator, the Student Peer Mentor, and the mentor. Formal, face-to-face student evaluation takes place at week 4 and upon program completion. In total, 27 HCI investigators have participated in PathMaker: 11 (40%) have participated with more than one cohort of trainees; 16 (59%) female, 11 (41%) male; 20 white, non-Latinx (74%), 3 Latinx (11%), and 4 Asian (15%).
The Summer Experience: Upon enrollment, trainees receive a UU identification card which welcomes them and facilitates access to UU resources. The trainees, SPMs, and Program Coordinator communicate regularly using a mobile application called GroupMe, which allows for real-time group or individual conversations.
Upon acceptance, trainees receive a booklet of the HCI research labs with information about the participating research teams. All trainees and their families are invited to a welcome reception held the week prior to the PathMaker residential start date. At that time, the trainees meet the PathMaker Program team and participating mentoring research labs. After the welcome reception, trainees submit their top three lab choices to the PathMaker Program Coordinator.
The lab-intensive training course orients the PathMaker trainee to lab safety, basic lab techniques, and population research tools that they are likely to encounter during their research experience. The training is experiential in nature. All trainees complete HIPAA and CITI training. Additional trainings may also be offered depending on the work in the lab.
Trainees participate in weekly educational and social activities which are intended to bring the cohort together, expose them to various career paths and resources, and develop their professional skills and resiliency (see Table 2).
Table 2.
Week 1–2 | Week 3 | Week 4–12 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
InitialEngagement |
Preparing for Research Exp |
Research Experience |
Developmental Experiences |
|
Increase Awareness |
Increase Capacity |
|||
Pre-arrival Preparation-Virtual:
f
|
|
|
|
|
PathMaker is well integrated with other residential summer programs, e.g., Native American Research Internship (NARI), the Genomics Summer Research Internship for Minorities (GSRM), and Summer Program for Undergraduate Research (SPUR). Both NARI and GSRM focus on providing research experiences for trainees traditionally underepresesented in biomedical research. PathMaker, NARI, GSRM and SPUR collaborate on weekly events in order to build a larger community for the summer research trainees.
The PathMaker cohort meets weekly to reflect, debrief, and share successes and setbacks. These sessions are facilitated by the SPMs who offer reflective and motivational listening, share experiences, and offer the trainees support and guidance.
The summer experience concludes with PathMaker trainees presenting their research posters at the annual Summer Symposium for Undergraduate Research sponsored by the UU Office of Undergraduate Research. The Symposium provides the trainees with the opportunity to engage with all UU PIs, trainees, and trainees engaged in summer research experiences and generally hosts more than 100 posters. The poster presentations are followed by an Honoring Ceremony for trainees, families, and friends. The ceremony includes a ‘graduation’ with certificate presentation, reception, group photo, and delivery of a digital Yearbook that includes a record of their experiences along with an individual research page with their poster.
Impact Assessment: PathMaker outcomes include program satisfaction; undergraduate retention and completion; academic accomplishments including scholarship awards; and progress on the path to pursue a biomedical cancer research career. For high school trainees, additional outcomes include high school completion and undergraduate acceptance. Our program outcomes assessment was reviewed by the UU Institutional Review Board and was deemed to be exempt.
Participants completed ongoing concurrent programmatic assessments during the experience. They also received a follow-up survey. This survey asked a single question: How has PathMaker changed or shaped your career or educational path. NVivo software was used to code open-ended responses. An inductive thematic analysis process of open coding, axial coding, and selective coding was used to identify themes in the responses[18]. Emerging themes were verified.
All PathMaker data are entered into a de-identified database. PathMaker staff maintain ongoing engagement with the trainees through email correspondence, social media (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn), and monthly newsletters. This post-experience engagement allows for ongoing support, opportunities for future work (i.e., Diversity Supplement applications), reunion experiences, and informal mentorship opportunities across cohorts. These interactions maintain current contact information; educational progress, recommendation requests; accomplishments and honors; and current research activities. These outcomes may be correlated with demographics; cohort year and program dates; mentor name (grant title and number); high school; and college. University acceptance status – including multiple acceptances, scholarship award data, and post-graduation activities were obtained by a post-summer experience completion survey through email, LinkedIn profile, or follow-up text to individual PathMaker participants. All trainees set up an eRA Commons ID and are added to the NIH CareerTrac System where trainee outcomes are supported throughout their career.
Results
Matriculation: PathMaker admission is competitive. Table 3 outlines matriculant demographics and acceptance rates. Consistent with national classifications[19], underrepresented populations in biomedical cancer research were identified as Black (B), American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN), Pacific Islander (PI), and Latinx (L). Women (W) were considered underrepresented since in Utah, women comprise 23.5% of the STEM workforce compared to 28.8% in the US [20] and make up 26.4% of the physician workforce compared to 35.7% nationally[21]. Similarly, although Asian trainees or trainees of Asian descent are often not considered underrepresented, in Utah, the Asian population is 2.4% compared to 5.5% nationally. Asian matriculants presented with intersectional HUS identities: women (69%), first-generation college trainees (85%), low socioeconomic status (46%), and refugee backgrounds (62%). Refugee, socioeconomic, and first-generation college student status, LGBTQ+, rural or frontier dwellers, and disability were also considered as factors representative of underrepresentation in the biomedical cancer research workforce.
Table 3.
Summer 2016 |
Spring 2017 |
Summer 2017 |
Summer 2018 |
Summer 2019 |
Total |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | |
AA or Black | 2 | 25 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 2 | 20 | 7 | 16 |
AI/AN | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
Asian | 3 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 57 | 3 | 23 | 3 | 30 | 13 | 30 |
White, Non-Latinx | 1 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
Latinx | 2 | 25 | 3 | 60 | 3 | 43 | 6 | 46 | 5 | 50 | 19 | 44 |
Female | 6 | 75 | 3 | 60 | 5 | 71 | 10 | 77 | 5 | 50 | 29 | 67 |
Male | 2 | 25 | 2 | 40 | 2 | 29 | 3 | 23 | 5 | 50 | 14 | 33 |
Gender Non-conforming | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
First Generation | 5 | 63 | 5 | 100 | 6 | 86 | 10 | 76 | 8 | 80 | 34 | 79 |
Low SES | 4 | 50 | 2 | 40 | 2 | 29 | 4 | 31 | 4 | 40 | 16 | 37 |
Rural | 1 | 13 | 2 | 40 | 1 | 14 | 3 | 23 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 19 |
Refugee | 3 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 40 | 10 | 23 |
Disability | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Average High School GPAa | 3.67 | 3.44b | 3.58 | 3.73 | 3.72 | 3.63 | ||||||
High | 3.96 | 3.96 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.94 | 3.97 | ||||||
Low | 3.30 | 3.00 | 2.80 | 3.20 | 3.36 | 3.13 | ||||||
High School Senior | 5 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 22 | ||||||
Freshman, Undergraduate | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 14 | ||||||
Sophomore, Undergraduate | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||||
Junior, Undergraduate | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||||||
Senior, Undergraduate | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||||||
Matriculants by Cohort | 8 | 5 | 7 | 13 | 10 | 43 | ||||||
Total # of Applicants | 17 | 11 | 32 | 29 | 79 | 168 | ||||||
Acceptance Rate | 47% | 45% | 22% | 45% | 13% | 26% |
aAverage HS GPA: admitted students UU: 3.5 [26].
bCollege GPA: all entrants were college students.
Most trainees enrolled at the UU (31 of 43). PathMaker trainees are more diverse than the overall UU student population (Table 4): Black (+15%), Latinx (+29%), AI/AN (+6%), Asian (+26%), and female (+22%) representation. Seventy-seven percent of alumni have declared a STEM major (Table 5).
Table 4.
U OF U |
PathMaker Trainees |
% Increase | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | N | % | ||
Asian | 2559 | 6 | 10 | 32 | 533 |
Black or African American | 506 | 1 | 5 | 16 | 1600 |
White, Non-Latinx | 29,319 | 72 | 2 | 6 | −92 |
International | 1653 | 4 | NA | NA | NA |
Latinx | 4130 | 10 | 12 | 39 | 390 |
Multiple Race/Ethnicity | 1436 | 4 | 0 | 0 | NA |
American Indian/Alaska Native | 197 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 600 |
Pacific Islander | 246 | 1 | 0 | 0 | −100 |
Unknown | 734 | 2 | 0 | 0 | NA |
Female | 20,113 | 49 | 22 | 71 | 144 |
Male | 20,667 | 51 | 9 | 29 | −43 |
Total | 40,780 | 31 |
Table 5.
Major | Overall |
U U |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
N | % (n = 43) | N | % (n = 33) | |
Athletic Therapy | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Biology | 13 | 30 | 11 | 26 |
Honors Biology | 2 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
BS/MD Biochem/Molecular Biology | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Chemistry | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Computer Science | 2 | 5 | 1 | 2 |
Kinesiology | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 |
Mechanical Engineering | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Neuroscience | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Nursing | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Physics | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Pre-Med | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 |
Psychology | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Recreational Therapy | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Undecided, Undeclared, or Unknown | 4 | 9 | 2 | 9 |
Non-STEM-related majors | 6 | 14 | 6 | 14 |
Total | 43 | 33 |
Program Perceptions: PathMaker participants stated that program was beneficial in many ways. The matching of trainees and mentors has proven successful. In addition to positive comments about the logistics and value of the PathMaker program, five themes were identified (Table 6). As an example, in discussing how PathMaker ‘Opened their Eyes to Research’, trainees spoke about how windows and doors of opportunity were opened to them. One student commented, ‘My experience there introduced to me scientific research and opened up many doors for me including finding future research opportunities.’
Table 6.
Theme | Coding Frequency (% of the data) |
---|---|
Opening Eyes to Research | 25.9 |
Exploring Interests to Find Direction | 23.3 |
Discovering Career Opportunities | 19.8 |
Building Confidence and Character | 19.0 |
Making Connections | 12.1 |
Academic success: PathMaker trainees have secured NCI research funding and participated in prestigious undergraduate research programs. One of the spring 2017 trainees and PI/mentor teams was awarded an NCI Diversity Supplement in 2018. This Award, which supports a supplementary project to the existing funded award, funds the trainee’s work for at least two years. All trainees and PI/mentor teams are encouraged to consider Diversity Supplements to continue to fund their collaboration.
PathMaker trainees have participated in the Harvard Research Experience for Undergraduates, John Hopkins School of Medicine Summer Internship Program, and the Broad Summer Research Program (BSRP) though Harvard and MIT. The BSRP is a highly competitive research program designed for trainees to pursue genomics-based research. After graduating, one trainee accepted a full-time research positon at the Broad Institute. Trainees have successfully obtained scholarships and have demonstrated that they are competitive applicants to nationally recognized colleges.
Of the 43 alumni (1 trainee left the program within days of starting and has been lost to follow-up), 32 are enrolled an undergraduate program: 1 community college, 23 UU, 8 other undergraduate program (3 in programs ranked in the top 15 in the US). Eleven have completed their undergraduate degrees: five are employed in STEM; one is pursuing a PhD in STEM; two are in medical school, and three have been lost to follow-up.
Discussion
PathMaker trainees are contributing to the diversity of the biomedical workforce as they uniformly identify as HUS in the biomedical sciences as outlined above. All accepted incoming high school seniors have completed high school and are enrolled in college. Of those who have declared a major, 77% are pursuing a STEM major. Of those who have graduated college, all, with known current status, are engaged in a career in science or are pursuing ongoing education towards a career in science.
Qualitative data support our hypothesis that embedding the PathMaker research experience within a supportive environment, one with the opportunity to build confidence, connect with mentors, and identify the intersection of interests with career opportunities, may bolster outcomes. The value of mentoring and an authentic research experience is a common theme in the undergraduate research literature[22]. Findings also indicate that an early research experience builds confidence and character and impacts general college success[23].
Our data demonstrate the theme of Making Connections as a thread that spanned all themes. Linn et al. (2015) contend that STEM trainees need to have an authentic research experience but also experience the context of research and practice[24]. Mentoring, communicating with researchers about research, and learning about research dissemination were all cited as value-added aspects the experience. PathMaker trainees had a research experience within a rich contextual environment that facilitated their ability to make explicit the connections between their new knowledge, their research experience, and their future career aspirations. PathMaker is an example of a high impact intervention that engages trainees in the act of learning and helps them make connections[25].
PathMaker’s success has fueled the development of new opportunities to support the development of HUS in biomedical cancer research. HCI launched a two-week summer research program in Summer 2019 for rural high school trainees who had not completed their junior year. This residential program allowed the partnering of a younger student with a PathMaker trainee for a peer mentoring experience. The experience took place during the last two weeks of the PathMaker program. The rural high school student shadowed their partner PathMaker trainee in the research lab, attended the educational sessions, and supported the PathMaker trainee at the final poster symposium. We anticipate that this program will create a natural entry point for the rural trainees to enter the PathMaker program and expect several applications for the subsequent summer PathMaker program.
Our experience with PathMaker served as the cornerstone for our successful PathMaker Programs for Cancer Research application funded through the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Youth Enjoy Science Research Education Program (YES R25) (1R25CA240171-01) to HCI in September 2019. This award will fund 14 PathMaker Scholar trainees for two consecutive summers, a teacher education component, PathMaker Bridge, and a middle school educational outreach component, PathMaker Connect.
Conclusion
PathMaker has served as a formative experience for its alumni. We do not contend that PathMaker is the one experience that is singularly responsible for a student’s success nor that there is only road to success. It is not our goal to demonstrate causality. We consider success to be the result of multiple, and likely, a matrix of factors. Our goal is to provide students interested in science with experiences within a supportive environment where they can continue to grow and thrive towards their stated goal. PathMaker is early in its history. It has demonstrated success. We share our approach as it is replicable and can be tailored to your own community. Our trainees have found it valuable, and it has served as a foundation for additional funded interventions to support the diversity of the biomedical research workforce. We will continue to follow our cohorts. We will continue to support our mentees, and we look forward to learning and sharing their ongoing path making success in future reports.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute; Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute.
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
- [1].Richert A, Campbell K, Rodríguez J, et al. Workforce column:ACU expanding and supporting the health care workforce. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2013;24(4):1423–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Rodriguez JE, Campbell KM, Adelson WJ.. Poor representation of blacks, latinos, and native Americans in medicine. Fam Med. 2015. April;47(4):259–263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Humes KR, Jones NA, Ramirez RR. Overview of race and Hispanic origin: 2010; 2011:23. [cited 2021 January23. https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-02.pdf
- [4].Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering . National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics; 2021 Jan 23; cited 2020 November22. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/digest/field-of-degree-minorities
- [5].Utah Division of Indian Affairs . Utah department of heritage and arts; 2020 January23. https://indian.utah.gov/tribal-nations/
- [6].Utah Dashboard . US Census Bureau; 2021 January23. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/dashboard/UT/PST045219
- [7].Perlich P Refugees in Utah; 2017:1. cited 2021 January23. https://gardner.utah.edu/wp-content/uploads/Refugee-Fact-Sheet-Final.pdf
- [8].Census Finds About 120 Languages Spoken in Utah . The Church of Jesus Christ of latter-day saints; 2021 January23. https://www.deseretnews.com/article/765681612/Census-finds-about-120-languages-spoken-in-Utah.html
- [9].Underwood SM, The FT. UWM Health Careers Bridge Program: an innovative approach for improving the recruitment, retention and graduation of minority students in nursing and health careers. J Nurs Educ. 1996. April;35(4):179–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Keith L, Hollar D. A social and academic enrichment program promotes medical school matriculation and graduation for disadvantaged students. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2012. July;25(1):55–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Sullivan WM, DeVolder J, Bhutiani M, et al. The MD-med joint-degree program at Vanderbilt University: training future expert medical educators. Acad Med. 2017. 08;92(8):1124–1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Pizur-Barnekow K, Rhyner PM, Lund S. The pipeline training program in maternal and child health: interdisciplinary preparation of undergraduate students from underrepresented groups. Matern Child Health J. 2010. May;14(3):422–429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Guerrero AD, Holmes FJ, Inkelas M, et al. Evaluation of the pathways for students into health professions: the training of under-represented minority students to pursue maternal and child health professions. Matern Child Health J. 2015. February;19(2):265–270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Bernstein J, Paine LL, Smith J, et al. The MCH Certificate Program: a new path to graduate education in public health. Matern Child Health J. 2001. March;5(1):53–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Pender M, Marcotte DE, Sto Domingo MR, et al. The STEM pipeline: the role of summer research experience in minority students’ Ph.D. Aspirations. Educ Policy Anal Arch 2010. December;18(30):1–36. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Ghee M, Keels M, Collins D, et al. Fine-tuning summer research programs to promote underrepresented students’ persistence in the STEM pathway. CBE Life Sci Educ. Fall 2016 2016;15(3):ar28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Alfred L, Beerman PR, Tahir Z, et al. Increasing underrepresented scientists in cancer research: the UCSD CURE program. J Cancer Educ. 2011. June;26(2):223–227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. In: Cooper H, Camic PM, Long PM, et al., editors. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: research designs: quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological American Psychological Association. American Psychological Association, Washington DC USA. 2012. p. 57–71. [Google Scholar]
- [19].The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2020: Women and Underrepresented Minorities . National Science Foundation; 2021 January 23; cited 2020 November23. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20201/u-s-s-e-workforce#women-and-underrepresented-minorities
- [20].Madsen SR, Goryunova E, Scribner RT. Utah women and stem. The Utah Women’s Health Review; cited 2020 November23. https://uwhr.utah.edu/utah-women-and-stem/#:~:text=This%20situation%20is%20likely%20even,to%2028.8%25%20for%20women%20nationwide
- [21].Bean M. Gender ratio of physicians across 50 states. Becker's Healthcare; cited 2020 November23; https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/rankings-and-ratings/gender-ratio-of-physicians-across-50-states.html
- [22].Palmer RJ, Hunt AN, Neal M, et al. Mentoring, undergraduate research, and identity development: a conceptual review and research agenda. Mentoring Tutoring Partnership Learn. 2015;23(5):411–426. [Google Scholar]
- [23].Murray DH, Obare SO, Hageman JH, American Chemical Society . Division of Chemical Education. The power and promise of early research. ACS symposium series. Am Chem Soc. 2016;xxvi:264. [Google Scholar]
- [24].Linn MC, Palmer E, Baranger A, et al. Education. Undergraduate research experiences: impacts and opportunities. Science. 2015. February;347(6222):1261757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Kuh G. High impact educational practices. Association of American Colleges and Universities. cited 2020 July30.
- [26].Utah Admission Requirements . collegesimply.com. cited 2020 November23. https://www.collegesimply.com/colleges/utah/university-of-utah/admission/