Skip to main content
Kansas Journal of Medicine logoLink to Kansas Journal of Medicine
. 2021 May 21;14(2):128–129. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol1414894

Detection of 2:1 Atrioventricular Block by Echocardiographic Doppler Mitral Inflow Study

Robert T Tung 1
PMCID: PMC8158410  PMID: 34084271

INTRODUCTION

Echocardiography is a commonly used diagnostic tool in diagnosing structural heart disease.1 In this case report, usefulness of echocardiography in detecting and confirming 2:1 atrioventricular (AV) block is described.

CASE REPORT

Echocardiography was performed on an 86-year-old patient for evaluation of his low extremity swelling in the absence of any other clinical symptoms or signs. The echocardiographic image of pulsed Doppler mitral inflow showing early (E) and late (A) diastolic filling waves is displayed in Figure 1 (top image). The E wave (early mitral in-flow wave) reflects the pressure gradient from the left atrium (LA)-left ventricle (LV) generated by the active LV relaxation, while the A wave (late mitral inflow wave) reflects the pressure gradient generated by LA contraction during LV diastole. A single lead electrocardiographic (ECG) tracing showed bradycardia at 39 beats/minute. There was a pattern of alternating E-A and A waves on Doppler mitral inflow and probably 2:1 atrioventricular (AV) block on ECG tracing (Figure 1; bottom image). Further analysis of Doppler mitral inflow A, E waves, and P, QRS waves on the ECG revealed that there is constant relationship of P-A waves (solid, white arrows) to suggest a normal sinus rhythm, while alternating 2:1 P-A to QRS-E (broken arrows) waves confirm 2:1 AV block as his underlying rhythm. A subsequent 12-lead ECG showed normal sinus rhythm and complete AV block with ventricular escape rhythm of right-bundle branch block morphology (Figure 2). With his advanced age and ECG findings, a pacemaker was implanted successfully.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(Top) Echocardiographic image showed pulsed wave Doppler of mitral inflow of E and A waves and A waves with QRS and P waves on ECG are demonstrated here. There is constant relationship of P-A (solid, white arrows) and QRS-E (broken, yellow arrows) waves, but a 2:1 ratio of A-E waves on mitral inflow and P-QRS waves on ECG confirms the 2:1 AV block.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A 12-lead ECG obtained later in the same patient showed normal sinus rhythm and complete AV block with a slow ventricular escape rhythm of right bundle branch block morphology. In lead V1, solid black arrows pointed to P waves; broken white arrows indicated buried P waves within QRS complex.

DISCUSSION

The AV block is diagnosed by ECG and can be physiological or indicative of underlying cardiac conduction disease. The AV block is classified as 1st-degree, 2nd-degree, 3rd-degree, or complete block.2,3 The 1st-degree AV block is defined as PR interval greater than 0.20 second on ECG. The 2nd-degree AV block is present when non-conducted P waves are observed at regular or irregular intervals; it is further sub-classified as Mobitz type I (Wenckebach) and type II block. The Mobitz type I AV block is characterized by progressive PR prolongation culminating in a non-conducted P wave, while in Mobitz type II, the PR interval remains constant prior to the blocked P wave. The block where only 2:1 AV conduction is present cannot be classified as either Mobitz I or II type. This 2:1 AV block can sometimes be misinterpreted as sinus bradycardia when the blocked P waves fall in or at the end of T waves that might be mistaken as U waves. The 3rd-degree or complete AV block is defined when P waves and QRS complexes bear no relationship to one another; clinically, these patients usually have slow pulses and likely symptoms of dizziness or even syncope.

Literature on echocardiographic findings of AV block included M-mode findings of A wave following P wave during AV block,4 M-mode of mitral leaflets showing multiple A waves corresponding to atrial tachycardia rate during complete heart block,5 and diastolic mitral or tricuspid regurgitation during AV block in animal and human models.6,7 The effects on LV diastolic function reflected by E-A wave changes were only described during 1st-degree AV block, bundle branch block, and cardiac pacing.8 This report showed a case of 2:1 AV block identified by observing the relationship of mitral inflow E-A waves on echocardiography to P-QRS waves on ECG. This simple observation confirmed 2:1 AV block even before an ECG was obtained.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Doherty GJ, Kort S, Mehran R, et al. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/ HRS/SCAI/ SCCT/SCMR/STS 2019 Appropriate Use Criteria for Multimodality Imaging in the Assessment of Cardiac Structure and Function in Nonvalvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019;32(5):553–579. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.WHO/ISC Task Force. Definition of terms related to cardiac rhythm. Am Heart J. 1978;95(6):796–806. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(78)90512-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, et al. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(7):932–987. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.D’Cruz LA, Prabhu R, Cohen HC, Glick G. Echocardiographic features of second degree atrio-ventricular block. Chest. 1977;72(4):459–463. doi: 10.1378/chest.72.4.459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sajeer K, Raju D, Kanjirakadavath B, Ranjith MP, Krishnan MN. Mitral valve m-mode echo in complete heart block with atrial tachycardia. Heart India. 2013;1(3):83–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Appleton CP, Basnight MA, Gonzales MS. Diastolic mitral regurgitation with atrioventricular conduction abnormalities: Relation of mitral flow velocity to transmitral pressure gradients in conscious dogs. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18(3):843–849. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90811-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schnittger IA, Appleton CP, Halte LK, Popp RL. Diastolic mitral and tricuspid regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography in patients with atrioventricular block: New insight into the mechanism of AV valve closure. J Am Coll Cardio. 1988;11(1):83–88. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90170-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nagueh S, Smieseth O, Appleton C, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: An update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Europe-an Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016;29(4):277–314. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Kansas Journal of Medicine are provided here courtesy of University of Kansas Medical Center

RESOURCES