Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 May 27;11:11203. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90460-8

A conductive polymer nanowire including functional quantum dots generated via pulsed laser irradiation for high-sensitivity sensor applications

Michiko Sasaki 1,, Masahiro Goto 1,
PMCID: PMC8159946  PMID: 34045531

Abstract

The fabrication of functional conductive polymer nanowires (CPNWs), including ultrahigh-sensitive flexible nanosensors has attracted considerable attention in field of the Internet of Things. However, the controllable and space-selective growth of CPNWs remains challenging, and a novel synthetic technique is required. Herein, we demonstrate the synthesis of space-selective CPNWs that include quantum dots (QDs) with changeable optical properties via single-pulse laser irradiation in air at atmospheric pressure. Time-resolved shadowgraphy was applied to monitor the synthetic process of the CPNWs and optimise the process conditions. The electrical conductivity of the CPNWs with QDs (QD-CPNWs) was analysed in the presence and absence of light irradiation and was found to change drastically (over six times) under light irradiation. QD-CPNW synthesis under laser irradiation shows great potential for fabricating highly photosensitive functional nanomaterials and is expected to be applied in the production of ultrahigh-sensitive photosensors in the future.

Subject terms: Polymers, Polymers

Introduction

Polymer-based nanowires (PNWs) are an important class of one-dimensional nanostructures. Given their flexibility, stretchability and low cost together with their excellent electrical, magnetic and optical properties, PNWs show great potential as the basic building blocks of nanosensors116, nanoelectronic devices1731 and solar cells3235 formed via bottom-up fabrication. In particular, conductive PNWs have attracted considerable attention because of their tunable electrical and optical properties in molecular structures or as chemical dopants. Nanosensors and nanoelectronic devices involving PNWs require space-selective fixing, easy drying process, low cost, size control and property control. Several approaches for the synthesis of PNWs have been reported, including the wetting of porous alumina templates36, electrospinning37 and methods based on solution chemistry. However, these methods do not provide space selectivity and size controllability, and the types of PNWs that can be synthesized are restricted by the requirement of high temperatures and/or chemical solvents. Therefore, the ability to synthesize controllable PNWs for nanosensors and nanoelectronic devices is currently limited.

A new method for the synthesis of PNWs using pulsed laser irradiation was reported in 200938. In this low-cost approach, the PNWs are generated at the laser focus point of the polymer source film with space selectively under dry conditions; iron oxide nanoparticles were also successfully introduced into the PNWs, demonstrating the potential of this method for modulating the PNW properties. However, only the synthesis of nonconductive PNWs was reported.

In this work, we demonstrate the space-selective synthesis of conductive polymer nanowires that include quantum dots (QD-CPNWs) with changeable electrical properties via single-pulse laser irradiation in air at atmospheric pressure. Time-resolved shadowgraphy was used to monitor the synthetic process and optimize the process conditions. The electrical properties and current–voltage (IV) characteristics of the QD-CPNWs were measured using a scanning electron microscopy (SEM)-based nano-probe system in the presence and absence of light irradiation. The conductivity of the QD-CPNWs was drastically increased by approximately six times by light irradiation.

Results and discussion

Inspired by the concept of PNWs synthesized via pulsed laser irradiation, we successfully synthesized poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-block-poly(ethylene glycol) (PEDOT-PEG) CPNWs including CdSe/ZnS core–shell QDs via single-shot pulsed laser irradiation at a wavelength of 440 nm, pulse duration of 800 ps and laser fluence of 145–155 J/cm2. The QD-CPNW growth process via pulsed laser irradiation is shown in Fig. 1a. Briefly, the QD-CPNWs were generated by a single pulsed laser irradiation from a source film prepared by drop-casting a solution of CdSe/ZnS core–shell QDs dispersed in PEDOT-PEG propylenecarbonate solution on a glass substrate. Figure 1b shows the time-resolved shadowgraphy images of the PEDOT-PEG CPNWs including CdSe/ZnS core–shell QDs (hereafter referred to as QD-CPNWs). The laser irradiation point and the head of the QD-CPNW in Fig. 1b are indicated by yellow and pink arrows, respectively. The main body of the QD-CPNW was difficult to detect from the shadowgraphy images because the QD-CPNW diameter was approximately 40 nm, which exceeds the diffraction limit of the irradiated flush lamp light. Fortunately, it was easier to detect the head of the QD-CPNW. The growth rate of the QD-CPNW after the beginning of irradiation 1 µs was 99 µm/s, and the growth process was terminated within 10 µs. The QD-CPNW grew diagonally from the source substrate. (see Supplementary Movie 1). This explains why the CPNWs could not be detected for a long time, because it can only be detected the growth direction of the CPNW was nearly parallel to the shadowgraphy screen surface. In contrast, nonconductive PNWs grew perpendicular to the surface and remained in the standing state for more than a few hours.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Conductive polymer nanowire (CPNW) growth process via pulsed laser irradiation. The CPNW including quantum dots (QDs) is diagonally grown from the laser irradiation point on a

source film. (b) Time-resolved shadowgraphy images of a PEDOT-PEG PNW including CdSe/ZnS core–shell QDs (QD-CPNW). The laser irradiation point and head of the CPNW are indicated by yellow and pink arrows, respectively.

High-resolution SEM, bright-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (BFSTEM), dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (DFSTEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) images of a PEDOT-PEG PNW including CdSe/ZnS core–shell QDs (diameter = approximately 6.3 nm) are shown in Fig. 2. The conductive PEDOT-PEG QD-CPNW can be observed in the SEM image (Fig. 2a), as confirmed by the EDX carbon map (Fig. 2d), and the QD-CPNW morphology was determined. Long CPNWs with lengths of approximately 260 µm and diameters of approximately 40 nm were generated. The CdSe/ZnS core–shell QDs were adhered to or included in the CPNWs, as indicated by the SEM, BFSTEM and DFSTEM images in Fig. 2a–c, respectively. Bright spots corresponding to relatively heavy elements were detected in the CPNWs. The CdSe/ZnS core–shell QDs were confirmed by EDX to contain Cd (Fig. 2e) and Se (Fig. 2f) elements, and the signal positions of these elements corresponded to the QD locations in the SEM images.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) High-resolution scanning electron microscopy (SEM), (b) bright-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (BFSTEM), (c) dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (DFSTEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) maps of (d) carbon, (e) Cd and (f) Se for the QD-CPNWs.

The basic growth mechanism of the QD-CPNWs was similar to that previously reported for nonconductive PNWs38,39. The source film was first photo-excited by the pulsed laser. The PEDOT-PEG polymer was then heated by the thermal energy converted from the absorbed laser light and melted. The melted polymer together with the CdSe/ZnS core–shell QDs was ejected from the surface of the source film, resulting in QD-CPNW growth. The typical length of the QD-CPNW was approximately several hundred µm, shorter than that of the nonconductive PNWs. As mentioned before, the growth direction of the conductive and nonconductive PNWs was diagonal and perpendicular to the source substrate, respectively. To generate QD-CPNWs, the laser fluence should be optimized; the range of optimum laser fluence for QD-CPNW growth in this study was narrow. The appropriate laser fluence for QD-CPNW growth was determined to be approximately 145–155 J/cm2. For CPNW without QDs, a higher laser fluence of approximately 160–170 J/cm2 was required for growth. It was demonstrated that the QDs assisted the absorption of laser light necessary for growth.

The electrical characteristics of the QD-CPNWs were analysed using a fine-structure evaluation system (Fig. 3a). The IV curves of the CPNWs without QDs in the presence and absence of light irradiation are shown in Fig. 3b. The CPNWs were irradiated using a light-emitting diode (LED) at a fixed irradiance of 30 µW/cm2. The electrical properties were not changed by light irradiation in this case. However, the IV properties were drastically changed when the CPNWs included QDs, as shown in Fig. 3c; the current value was enhanced more than nine times under light irradiation at an induced potential of 4.94 V. The conductivities of QD-CPNWs without and with light irradiation were determined to be 0.045 and 0.42 S/m, respectively, at 4.94 V. The conductivity of QD-CPNWs without light irradiation decreased to 1.1 × 10−5 S/m for CPNW (without QD). This may result from changes in the polymer network structure following the introduction of QDs; however, there is currently no possibility to analyze this. The QD-CPNW could be detected weak intensity light as the changing the conductivity.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) The measuring process of a CPNW conductivity using a SEM-based nano-probe system. (b) IV curves of the CPNWs without QDs in the presence and absence of light irradiation, (c) with QDs.

Figure 4 shows a model of the photo-induced current of the QD-CPNW. Carriers such as electrons and holes are confined in the QDs in a state close to each other40,41, causing carrier-to-carrier interactions such as the Auger effect and carrier amplification. Therefore, the carriers are generated efficiently in the QDs under weak light irradiation, and the QDs cause the charge transfer to CPNW, which is observed as the photo-induced current. Photosensivity (R) is evaluated using the following equation.

R=Iph/P

where Iph is photocurrent (Iph = Ilight – Idark) and P is light power. The QD-CPNW exhibited a high R value of ~ 1.6 × 105 A/W at an induced potential of 4.94 V, which is among the highest values observed for two-dimensional optoelectronic materials. For example, the R values of B-doped Si-QD/graphene phototransistors42 and WSe2–In2O3 NW phototransistors43 exhibited values of ~ 109 (UV-NIR), ~ 44.9 (MIR, 77 K), and 7.5 × 105 (637 nm), 3.5 × 104 (940 nm). The R value shown by QD-CPNW in this work is comparable to that of the highest value optoelectronic materials.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A generation model of the photo-induced current of the QD-CPNW. Carriers such as electrons and holes are generated efficiently in the QDs under weak light irradiation, and charge transfer from the QDs to CPNW occurs, which is observed as the photo-induced current.

Conclusions

QD-CPNWs were successfully obtained via pulsed laser irradiation. The structure of a QD-CPNW was analysed in detail by STEM-EDX. CdSe/ZnS core–shell QDs were dispersed in the PEDOT-PEG matrix of the PNW. The growth mechanism of the QD-CPNWs was proposed. The electrical characteristics of the QD-CPNWs in the presence and absence of light irradiation were analysed. The conductivity of the QD-CPNWs was drastically increased by light irradiation because of the carrier generation in the QDs, in contrast to the CPNWs without QDs. The proposed method for synthesizing QD-CPNWs via laser irradiation can be applied to produce highly photosensitive functional nanomaterials. This method is expected to be useful for the generation of ultrahigh-sensitivity photosensors in the future.

Methods

Conductive polymer nanowire fabrication

A mixed solvent was obtained by mixing 15 ml of a solution of PEDOT:PEG (8 wt. %) dispersed propylenecarbonate (Sigma-Aldrich) and 5 ml of CdSe/ZnS QDs (diameter = approximately 6.3 nm, fluorescence center wavelength = 640 nm, 5 mg/ml solution in toluene; Lumidot, Sigma-Aldrich 694,606). The QDs consisted of CdSe cores covered with thin ZnS shells (CdSe/ZnS core–shell QDs). Typical absorption and photoluminescence spectra of the QDs in toluene is shown in Fig. 5. The size of the CdSe/ZnS core–shell QDs with 6.3 nm in diameter was selected considering the photo absorption property which absorbed the emission wavelength range of white LED.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Absorption and photoluminescence spectra of CdSe/ZnS core–shell QDs.

Ofcourse, the appropriate QDs diameter can be selected according to the requirement of the application. To create the source films, 2-ml drops of solvent were cast on borosilicate glass substrates and then dried in atmosphere in a clean booth for 30 min. To synthesize QD-CPNWs, the source films were irradiated by a focused, single-pulse laser (wavelength = 440 nm, pulse duration = 900 ps) through an objective lens with a 20 × magnification. The diameter of the laser focus spot was approximately 1.1 µm. We attempted to grow QD-CPNWs) in the laser irradiation area of the source film surface.

Characterization and photo-induced current measurement

The QD-CPNW growth process was monitored by shadowgraphy using an inverted optical microscope (IX-70, Olympus Co.) equipped with a high-speed video camera (HyperVision HPV-2A, Shimadzu Co., Ltd.) (Fig. 6). The QD-CPNW was generated from the source polymer film surface by laser irradiation through the transparent borosilicate glass substrate. The flashlight from the opposite side of the high-speed video camera illuminated the generated QD-CPNW. The high-speed video camera recorded the shape of QD-CPNW as the shadowgraphy video. A timing generator was used for setting the time delays for the QD-CPNW generation laser, the flashlight, and high-speed video camera recording. The diameter of the QD-CPNW exceeded the optical diffraction limit while the resolution of obtained video flame images reached the limit. In addition, although a high-intensity flash lamp was used for high-speed video shadowgraphy, the video image contrast of the QD-CPNW was also limited.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Experimental shadowgraphy setup used to monitor QD-CPNW growth using a high-speed camera. QD-CPNW was generated from the polymer film surface by laser irradiation through the borosilicate glass substrate. The high-speed video camera recorded the shape of the QD-CPNW as a shadowgraphy image. A timing generator was used for setting the time delays for the QD-CPNW generation laser, the flashlight, and high-speed video camera recording.

The shape and composition of a QD-CPNW was analysed by an ultrahigh-resolution SEM (SU9000, Hitachi High-Technologies Corp.). The carbon microgrid for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observation was placed on the source film to capture the grown QD-CPNWs. In order to increase the amount of captured QD-CPNWs, the laser fluence was increased to a value greater than that of the fluence. Therefore, the captured QD-CPNWs on the carbon microgrid were decomposed to small fragments. We mounted the QD-CPNWs on a carbon microgrid for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observation. The electrical conductivity of the synthesised QD-CPNWs was analysed using a fine-structure device characteristic evaluation system (N-6000, Hitachi High-Technologies Corp.). The IV curves of the QD-CPNWs analysed by this system to confirm reproducibility, together with the IV curve data of different samples, are shown in Supplementary Fig. S1.

We used a white LED to assess the change in QD-CPNW conductivity under light. The fluence of the LED was measured using a photodiode sensor (PD300-UV, Ophir Corp.). The relative spectral power distribution of the LED are shown in Supplementary Figure S2.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Video 1. (4.1MB, mp4)

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Mr. Takeshi Sunaoshi, Mr. Hiroyuki Ito and Mr. Kohei Soda of Hitach High-Technologies Co., Ltd. for collecting the SEM and EDX images and measuring the electrical properties of the QD-CPNWs. This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant number 24656058.

Author contributions

M.G. conceived the experiment, M.S. conducted the experiment, M.S. and M.G. analysed the results. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Michiko Sasaki, Email: sasaki.michiko@nims.go.jp.

Masahiro Goto, Email: goto.masahiro@nims.go.jp.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-90460-8.

References

  • 1.Duay J, Gillette E, Liu R, Lee SB. Highly flexible pseudocapacitor based on freestanding heterogeneous MnO2/conductive polymer nanowire arrays. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012;14:3329–3337. doi: 10.1039/c2cp00019a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gu F, Zhang L, Yin X, Tong L. Polymer single-nanowire optical sensors. Nano Lett. 2008;8:2757–2761. doi: 10.1021/nl8012314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kannan B, Williams DE, Laslau C, Travas-Sejdic J. A highly sensitive, label-free gene sensor based on a single conducting polymer nanowire. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012;35:258–264. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.02.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Muthuchamy N, Lee KP, Gopalan AI. Enhanced photoelectrochemical biosensing performances for graphene (2D)—titanium dioxide nanowire (1D) heterojunction polymer conductive nanosponges. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017;89:390–399. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ramanathan K, et al. Bioaffinity sensing using biologically functionalized conducting-polymer nanowire. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:496–497. doi: 10.1021/ja044486l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sablon KA. Polymer Single-nanowire optical sensor. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2009;4:94–95. doi: 10.1007/s11671-008-9191-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chen YS, Hsieh GW, Chen SP, Tseng PY, Wang CW. Zinc oxide nanowire-poly(methyl methacrylate) dielectric layers for polymer capacitive pressure sensors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7:45–50. doi: 10.1021/am505880f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tang N, Jiang Y, Qu H, Duan X. Conductive polymer nanowire gas sensor fabricated by nanoscale soft lithography. Nanotechnology. 2017;28:485301. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/aa905b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cui Y, Wei QQ, Park HK, Lieber CM. Nanowire nanosensors for highly sensitive and selective detection of biological and chemical species. Science. 2001;293:1289–1292. doi: 10.1126/science.1062711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Patolsky F, Lieber CM. Nanowire nanosensors. Mater. Today. 2005;8:20. doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(05)00791-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Duan XJ, Lieber CM. Nanoscience and the nano-bioelectronics frontier. Nano Res. 2015;8:1–22. doi: 10.1007/s12274-014-0692-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhang AQ, Zheng GF, Lieber CM. Nanowire field-effect transistor sensors. Nanosci. Technol. 2016 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-41981-7_10. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen Y-Z, et al. Phase-modulated 3D-hierarchical 1T/2H WSe2 nanoscrews by a plasma-assisted selenization process as high performance NO gas sensors with a ppb-level detection limit. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019;7:22314–22322. doi: 10.1039/c9ta05348d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lin CH, et al. Giant optical anisotropy of perovskite nanowire array films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201909275. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.AlAmri AM, Leung SF, Vaseem M, Shamim A, He JH. Fully inkjet-printed photodetector using a graphene/perovskite/graphene heterostructure. IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 2019;66:2657–2661. doi: 10.1109/TED.2019.2911715. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Manikandan A, et al. Graphene-coated copper nanowire networks as a highly stable transparent electrode in harsh environments toward efficient electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reactions. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2017;5:13320–13328. doi: 10.1039/C7TA01767G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Anikeeva P, Lieber CM, Cheon J. Creating functional interfaces with biological circuits. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018;51:987. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dong Y, Yu G, McAlpine MC, Lu W, Lieber CM. Si/a-Si core/shell nanowires as nonvolatile crossbar switches. Nano Lett. 2008;8:386–391. doi: 10.1021/nl073224p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Friedman RS, McAlpine MC, Ricketts DS, Ham D, Lieber CM. Nanotechnology: high-speed integrated nanowire circuits. Nature. 2005;434:1085. doi: 10.1038/4341085a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gudiksen MS, Lauhon LJ, Wang J, Smith DC, Lieber CM. Growth of nanowire superlattice structures for nanoscale photonics and electronics. Nature. 2002;415:617–620. doi: 10.1038/415617a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hong G, Lieber CM. Author correction: novel electrode technologies for neural recordings. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2019;20:376. doi: 10.1038/s41583-019-0169-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kemp NT, Newbury R, WCochrane, J., Dujardin, E, Electronic transport in conducting polymer nanowire array devices. Nanotechnology. 2011 doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/22/10/105202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lee JM, et al. Nanoenabled direct contact interfacing of syringe-injectable mesh electronics. Nano Lett. 2019;19:5818–5826. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Park WI, Zheng G, Jiang X, Tian B, Lieber CM. Controlled synthesis of millimeter-long silicon nanowires with uniform electronic properties. Nano Lett. 2008;8:3004–3009. doi: 10.1021/nl802063q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shim W, Yao J, Lieber CM. Programmable resistive-switch nanowire transistor logic circuits. Nano Lett. 2014;14:5430–5436. doi: 10.1021/nl502654f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Strevens AE, et al. Hybrid light-emitting polymer device fabricated on a metallic nanowire array. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005 doi: 10.1063/1.1891297. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Viveros RD, et al. Advanced one- and two-dimensional mesh designs for injectable electronics. Nano Lett. 2019;19:4180–4187. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vlad A, et al. Vertical single nanowire devices based on conducting polymers. Nanotechnology. 2012 doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/23/2/025302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yang X, et al. Bioinspired neuron-like electronics. Nat. Mater. 2019;18:510–517. doi: 10.1038/s41563-019-0292-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhao Y, et al. Scalable ultrasmall three-dimensional nanowire transistor probes for intracellular recording. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2019;14:783–790. doi: 10.1038/s41565-019-0478-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tseng JY, et al. Pressure welding of silver nanowires networks at room temperature as transparent electrodes for efficient organic light-emitting diodes. Small. 2018;14:e1800541. doi: 10.1002/smll.201800541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lee DJ, et al. Vertically aligned ZnCdS nanowire arrays/P3HT heterojunctions for solar cell applications. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;487:73–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Moiz SA, et al. A stamped PEDOT:PSS-silicon nanowire hybrid solar cell. Nanotechnology. 2012;23:145401. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/23/14/145401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Park KT, et al. 132% efficiency Si nanowire/PEDOT:PSS hybrid solar cell using a transfer-imprinted Au mesh electrode. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:12093. doi: 10.1038/srep12093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shen X, Sun B, Liu D, Lee ST. Hybrid heterojunction solar cell based on organic-inorganic silicon nanowire array architecture. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:19408–19415. doi: 10.1021/ja205703c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Steinhart M, et al. Polymer nanotubes by wetting of ordered porous templates. Science. 2002;296:1997–1997. doi: 10.1126/science.1071210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Babel A, Li D, Xia YN, Jenekhe SA. Electrospun nanofibers of blends of conjugated polymers: morphology, optical properties, and field-effect transistors. Macromolecules. 2005;38:4705–4711. doi: 10.1021/ma047529r. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Goto M, Kasahara A, Tosa M. Synthesis of polymer nanowires by pulsed laser irradiation. Appl. Phys. Express. 2009;2:065503. doi: 10.1143/APEX.2.065503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sasaki M, Goto M, Kasahara A, Tosa M, Chikyow T. Synthesis of polystyrene nanowires doped with iron oxide nanoparticles using a pulsed laser. Appl. Phys. Express. 2013;6:045004. doi: 10.7567/APEX.6.045004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vokhmintcev KV, Samokhvalov PS, Nabiev I. Charge transfer and separation in photoexcited quantum dot-based systems. Nano Today. 2016;11:189–211. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2016.04.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Krivenkov V, et al. Ligand-mediated photobrightening and photodarkening of CdSe/ZnS quantum dot ensembles. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2018;122:15761–15771. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b04544. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mittendorff M, et al. Ultrafast graphene-based broadband THz detector. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013;103:021113. doi: 10.1063/1.4813621. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Guo N, et al. Hybrid WSe2-In2O3 phototransistor with ultrahigh detectivity by efficient suppression of dark currents. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9:34489–34496. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b10698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Video 1. (4.1MB, mp4)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES