Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the effects of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) on the immune function of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 114 patients with HCC were selected and their peripheral blood was collected before and 1 month after TACE treatment. Flow cytometry and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR were performed to analyze the changes in immune function in patients before and after treatment. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for survival analysis. The programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) expression before TACE treatment were significantly higher in patients with poor TACE response compared with those patients with well response. Higher PD-L1 mRNA expression in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells after TACE predicted a superior prognosis. After TACE treatment, the proportion of CD4+/CD8+ cells were decreased while the expression levels of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) were significantly increased. To conclude, TACE could reduce the proportion of CD4+/CD8+ cells and improve the mRNA expression levels of PD1 in patients with HCC. The expression levels of PD1 and PD-L1 were closely related to the therapeutic effect of TACE and the prognosis of patients with HCC. TACE combined with immunotherapy may have potential clinical value for patients with HCC.
Keywords: immune function, hepatocellular carcinoma, transarterial chemoembolization, programmed cell death protein 1, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common tumor of the digestive system and the second leading cause of tumor deaths worldwide (1). The pathogenesis of HCC is complex, involving environmental factors, dietary habits and familial inheritance, and infection with hepatitis B or C virus remains a major risk factor (2). Chronic hepatitis develops into cirrhosis and eventually leads to HCC. In China, which is one of the highly endemic countries, hepatitis B virus carriers account for 20% of the total population, with a 7–8% prevalence rate of hepatitis B (3,4). HCC has no specificity in the early stage and is a rapidly progressive disease (5). Numerous patients are diagnosed in the middle and late stages, with poor therapeutic effects and prognosis (3).
Current clinical applications include hepatectomy, liver transplantation, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and sorafenib (6,7). TACE includes different combinations of chemotherapeutic and embolization drugs. Injection of an embolization agent can obstruct the artery supplying the tumor, resulting in ischemic necrosis of the tumor tissue (8). Chemoembolization agents include anticancer drugs, such as mitomycin and carboplatin or drug microspheres, iodinated oil emulsions and gelatin sponges (6). TACE treatment has been demonstrated to have a positive effect on survival outcomes (9). TACE is a first-line treatment for mid-term HCC, such as asymptomatic, unresectable nodular lesions, no vascular invasion or extrahepatic diffusion and well-preserved liver function (10).
Lei et al (3) compared the effects of oxaliplatin alone and oxaliplatin combined with endostar on the immune function of patients with primary liver cancer. Their study revealed that oxaliplatin combined with endostar was effective in prolonging patient survival time, improving T lymphocyte subgroup levels and enhancing patient immunity (3). Ito et al (11) reported that RFA improved the efficacy of adaptive T cell therapy in murine models, and this can be supplemented by immunotherapy to achieve more effective results. However, Löffler et al (12) demonstrated that RFA-induced immune effects are not sufficient against tumors. Therefore, the combination of traditional therapy and immunotherapy is worthy of further study. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether TACE therapy was associated with immune function in patients with HCC.
Materials and methods
Patients
A total of 114 patients (age range, 35–91 years old) with HCC were enrolled in the present study at Qingdao Sixth People's Hospital (Qingdao, China). Date of the first diagnosis of HCC was from April 2013 to February 2020. Date of the last follow-up was April 2020. A total of 50 patients were treated by surgery, 10 by biopsies and the rest had neither surgery nor biopsy. The following inclusion criteria were used for the patients: i) First TACE treatment; ii) conformed to the indications of TACE treatment, with no history of radiotherapy or systemic chemotherapy before TACE treatment; iii) no autoimmune diseases present or no drugs affecting immune function were taken 3 months before treatment. The exclusion criteria used were as follows: i) Patients with metastatic liver cancer; ii) patients with serious heart, brain, lung, kidney and blood system diseases; iii) pregnant and lactating women; iv) patients had communication disorders, such as cases with hepatic encephalopathy or depression; and v) unwilling to participate.
The criteria for diagnosis included clinical manifestations, imageology, α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels and pathological examination, which met the diagnostic criteria of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer (v1; 2018) (13). All patients provided signed informed consent for surgery and were treated with TACE. Clinical data were collected by the hospital system. Fresh peripheral blood was collected and stored in tubes with EDTA anticoagulation for assessment of immune function before intervention and 1 month after treatment. Written informed consent was signed by all patients and healthy donors before participation in the study. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qingdao Sixth People's Hospital (Qingdao, China).
Liver function assessment criteria
Child-Pugh grading system (14) was used to evaluate patient liver function. A total of five indices (including the hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, total bilirubin, albumin and prothrombin time) of patients were divided into 3 levels, corresponding to 1,2,3, respectively. Finally, scores were added up and a high score indicated the severity of liver damage. See Table I for details.
Table I.
Score | |||
---|---|---|---|
Indices | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Total bilirubin (µmol/l) | <34.2 | 34.2–51.3 | >51.3 |
Albumin (g/l) | ≥35 | 28–35 | <28 |
Prothrombin time (sec) | 1–4 | 4–6 | >6 |
Hepatic encephalopathy (grade) | None | 1 or 2 | 3 or 4 |
Ascites | None | Mild | Moderate |
It was graded as 5–6 points for Child-Pugh-A; 7–9 points for Child-Pugh-B; and 10–15 points for Child-Pugh-C.
TACE procedure and treatment response evaluation
All patients were treated with TACE using the Seldinger technique (15). Ultrasound-guided percutaneous insertion of a retrograde catheter was performed from the femoral artery through the celiac trunk and hepatic artery, and the final location of the catheter was determined by the tumor location. Chemotherapeutic drugs, including fluorouracil, mitomycin and carboplatin were mixed with iodized oil to form a pingyangmycin lipiodol emulsion. The mixture was injected into gelfoam to block blood supply to the tumor as embolic agents. The dose and type of chemotherapeutic drug depended on the patient's age, weight, and liver and kidney function. In addition, patients also underwent concomitant therapy, such as disodium cantharidinate (0.25 g; once daily; intravenous injection) for antitumor therapy, tiopronin (0.2 g; once daily; intravenous injection) for liver protection and supportive treatment, such as hemostasis and rehydration to prevent electrolyte disturbances and prophylactic antibiotics for preventing infection in patients after surgery. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (16), the therapeutic effect was evaluated as follows: Complete remission (CR), where all target lesions had disappeared; partial response (PR), where the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions decreased by ≥30%; stable disease (SD), indicating neither PR nor progressive disease (PD); and PD, where the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions increased by ≥20% or new lesions or metastases appeared. CR and PR were defined as a satisfactory response, while SD and PD were regarded as a poor response. Overall survival was defined as the time interval between patients undergoing TACE and death or the last follow-up.
Diagnosis of liver cirrhosis
The diagnostic criteria for cirrhosis included: i) Pseudolobules were diagnosed through percutaneous liver biopsy; and ii) liver stiffness measurement ≥17.5 kPa using FibroScan (transient elastography). Patients with either of the aforementioned criteria were diagnosed with liver cirrhosis.
Isolation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)
Peripheral blood was collected from 114 patients with HCC who received TACE intervention and 20 healthy donors. The recruitment of healthy blood donors at the Sixth People's Hospital of Qingdao (Qingdao, China) began in February 2014 and ended in October 2017. The age range of the healthy controls was 21–67 years. There were 14 men and 4 women. The inclusion criteria used for the healthy contacts were as follows: i) Body mass index (BMI) between 19–26; >45 kg for women, >50 kg for men; iii) understood fully the purpose of the study and voluntarily signed the informed consent; and iv) had no history of chronic or serious diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, and were in good general health. The exclusion criteria were as follows: i) Had taken any medication within 3 months; ii) Had any medical condition; PBMCs were separated using the Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient deposition method (17). At room temperature, the blood diluted by PBS was centrifuged at 300 × g for 20 min. Cells of the mononuclear cell layer were collected and cleaned with PBS at room temperature at 300 × g for 10 min. The precipitated cells were suspended in the medium for later use. PBMCs were washed for 3 min using PBS at room temperature and further analyzed by flow cytometry or reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR).
Flow cytometric analysis
Flow cytometry was used to detect CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells. PBMCs were collected, washed for 3 min using PBS at room temperature and centrifuged at 200 × g for 5 min at room temperature and the supernatant was discarded. FITC-anti-CD3 (1:200; cat. no. 561806; BD Biosciences), phycoerythrin-anti-CD4 (1:200; cat. no. 561843; BD Biosciences) and allophycocyanin-Cy7-anti-CD8 (1:200; cat. no. 557760; BD Biosciences) antibodies were added, followed by incubation at 4°C for 20 min. PBMCs were washed for 5 min using PBS at room temperature. Following centrifugation at 200 × g for 5 min at room temperature, the PBMCs were resuspended with PBS containing 1% paraformaldehyde for fixation at room temperature, detected (FACSCanto II; BD Biosciences) and analyzed by CellQuest software v.5.1 (BD Biosciences).
RNA extraction and RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from isolated cells using TRIzol® reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Extracted total RNA was then reverse transcribed into cDNA. The reaction tube containing total RNA was first held at 37°C for 15 min for reverse transcription, then heated at 85°C for 5 min for inactivation of reverse transcriptase, and cooled to 4°C for storage. cDNA was analyzed by qPCR according to the Takara two-step method (Takara Bio, Inc.). The thermocycling conditions were as follows: Firstly, 1 cycle at 95°C for 30 sec for initial denaturation; followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 5 sec for denaturation and at last 60°C for 30–34 sec for annealing. The primer sequences of programmed cell death 1 ligand (PD-L1) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) are shown in Table II.
Table II.
Gene | Forward primer (5′-3′) | Reverse primer (5′-3′) |
---|---|---|
PD-L1 | GAGGGAATGCGTATTTTGGGT | AGGTTGTTCTTGTGTCACCTG |
PD1 | TCGTCCACTGCGGCTTTTTA | GCAAGGTCGGGTATTTAAGCA |
GAPDH | TGTGGGCATCAATGGATTTGG | ACACCATGTATTCCGGGTCAAT |
PD1, programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1.
The 2−ΔΔCq method (18) was used to quantify gene expression. GAPDH was used as the internal reference gene.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed three times. Quantitative data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and categorical data is shown as the number of cases. Comparisons between before and after treatment were performed using a paired t-test. The association between the levels of PD1/PD-L1 and the efficacy of TACE was assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test. The association between PD1/PD-L1 expression and survival time was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis with a log-rank test. All data were analyzed using SPSS v22.0 (IBM Corp.) and GraphPad Prism 8.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with HCC
A total of 114 patients with HCC, including 84 male and 30 female patients, were included in the present study (Table III). The mean age was 66.5±12.6 years. There were 54 patients who were >65 years old and the remaining 60 patients were ≤65 years old. A total of 97 patients had hepatitis B, while 17 patients had hepatitis C. According to the Child-Pugh grading system (14), 89 cases were classified as grade A, 20 cases were classified as grade B and 5 cases were classified as grade C.
Table III.
Characteristics | Value |
---|---|
Sex, n | |
Male | 84 |
Female | 30 |
Mean age ± std, years | 66.5±12.6 |
Age, n | |
>65 years | 54 |
≤65 years | 60 |
Etiology, n | |
Hepatitis B | 97 |
Hepatitis C | 17 |
Child-Pugh classification, n | |
A | 89 |
B | 20 |
C | 5 |
Liver cirrhosis, n | |
Present | 100 |
Absent | 14 |
Tumor size, n | |
≤5 cm | 59 |
>5 cm | 55 |
Tumor number, n | |
Single | 80 |
Multiple | 34 |
Median maximum diameter of multiple tumors, cm (range) | 3.4 (0.8–7.5) |
Maximum diameter of multiple tumors, n | |
<2 cm | 12 |
2–5 cm | 12 |
>5 cm | 10 |
Number of multiple tumors, n | |
2 | 20 |
3 | 8 |
4 | 3 |
5 | 2 |
>5 | 1 |
AFP before TACE treatment, n (ng/ml) | |
<200 | 54 |
≥200 | 60 |
AFP after TACE treatment, n (ng/ml) | |
<200 | 99 |
≥200 | 15 |
TACE response, n | |
Poor | 55 |
Well | 59 |
Median follow-up, months (range) | 23.5 (3–82) |
Overall mortality | 37 (32.5%) |
AFP, α-fetoprotein; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization.
A total of 100 cases were diagnosed with liver cirrhosis. The maximum tumor diameter was >5 cm in 55 cases and ≤5 cm in 59 cases. There were 80 cases presenting with a single tumor and 34 cases presenting with multifocal tumors (Table III). Among patients with multifocal tumors, the maximum diameter of multiple tumors ranged between 0.8 and 7.5 cm, with a median of 3.4 cm. A total of 20 patients had two tumors, 8 patients had three tumors, 3 patients had four tumors, 2 patients had five tumors and 1 patient had more than five tumors (seven tumors). The levels of AFP before TACE treatment were <200 ng/ml in 54 cases, while 60 patients exceeded these levels. After TACE treatment, AFP levels in 99 cases were <200 ng/ml and 15 cases remained at levels of ≥200 ng/ml. A total of 59 patients responded well to TACE, while the remaining 55 patients responded poorly. The end date of the follow-up was April 2020, with a median of 23.5 months (range, 3–82 months). A total of 37 patients died and the overall mortality rate was 32.5% (Table III).
Effects of TACE treatment on the immune function of patients
To further verify the effects of TACE treatment on the immune function of patients, the immune status of patients was examined before and after TACE treatment. The levels of CD3+, CD4+/CD8+, PD1 and PD-L1 were selected as indices to evaluate immune function (Table IV, Fig. 1). Before patients underwent TACE treatment, the mean values of PD1 and PD-L1 mRNA expression levels were 2.496 and 2.853, respectively. After TACE treatment was performed, the mean values of PD1 and PD-L1 mRNA expression levels were 4.312 and 3.11, respectively. CD4+/CD8+ significantly decreased after TACE treatment (P<0.001). Notably, the relative mRNA expression levels of PD1 were significantly upregulated (P<0.001). The mRNA expression levels of PD-L1 were also increased after TACE treatment; however, this difference was not significant (P=0.083). In addition, there was no significant difference observed in CD3+ levels (P=0.167).
Table IV.
Parameter | Before TACE treatment | After TACE treatment | t | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
CD4+/CD8+ (mean ± std) | 1.818±0.720 | 1.462±0.717 | 4.141 | <0.001 |
CD3+ (mean ± std) (µl) | 81.632±6.141 | 82.658±5.867 | −1.392 | 0.167 |
PD1 relative mRNA level | 2.496±0.939 | 4.312±0.558 | −17.801 | <0.001 |
PD-L1 relative mRNA level | 2.853±1.048 | 3.113±1.209 | −1.679 | 0.083 |
PD1, programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization.
To further clarify the association between the therapeutic effects of TACE and PD1/PD-L1 expression, the mRNA expression levels of PD-L1/PD1 were detected in healthy donors and patients, which were divided into well or poor response to TACE groups (Fig. 2A and B). Compared with healthy subjects, the expression levels of PD-L1/PD1 in patients with HCC were significantly increased (P<0.001). The mRNA expression levels of both PD-L1 (Fig. 2A) and PD1 (Fig. 2B) in patients with HCC with poor TACE response were higher compared with those in patients with satisfactory TACE response (all P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to analyze the survival of patients with high and low expression levels of PD1/PD-L1. According to the average mentioned in Table IV, patients were divided into two groups for further analysis. Before patients underwent TACE treatment, PD1 mRNA levels >2.5 and PD-L1 mRNA levels >3.0 were regarded as high PD1/PD-L1 expression levels, respectively. After TACE treatment was performed, PD1 mRNA expression >4.0 and PD-L1 mRNA expression >3.0 were considered as high PD1/PD-L1 expression levels, respectively. There was no statistical difference in survival prognosis between the high expression PD1 (P=0.761)/PD-L1 (P=0.221) group and the low expression group before TACE treatment (Fig. 2C and D). However, after TACE treatment, PD-L1 expression could be used to predict the prognosis of patients with HCC. After TACE treatment, compared with high PD-L1 expression, high PD-L1 expression significantly indicated improved prognosis (P=0.017), while the expression level of PD1 (P=0.371) could not predict the prognosis before and after TACE treatment (Fig. 2E and F).
Discussion
The immune system serves an important role in tumor progression (19). The interaction between the tumor and immune system can be divided into three stages: Immune elimination, immune balance and immune escape (20). In the early stages of tumorigenesis, natural killer cells recognize and kill cancer cells, and the debris is consumed by macrophages. Dendritic cells exposed to cancer cell antigens secrete inflammatory cytokines and present neoantigens to T cells (20,21). T cells and B cells are then activated, resulting in the activation of cellular immunity, which results in protection against inflammation in the body (22). A study by Ge et al (23) on the influence of immune cell infiltration on the prognosis of patients with colon cancer indicated that CD4+ T cell infiltration exerted marked antitumor effects. A high density of CD8+ T cells in advanced gastric cancer has been considered to be associated with favorable prognosis (24). In the present study, PBMCs from 114 patients with HCC were collected to determine the effects of TACE therapy on the immune system. The CD4+/CD8+ ratio decreased after TACE treatment, indicating that the CD8+ cells were increased and immune function of the patients was restored (25).
Tumor cells can evade immune surveillance through a variety of mechanisms, including activating immune checkpoints to suppress the antitumor immune response (26). PD1 is expressed on activated T cells, B lymphocytes and natural killer cells. PD1 binds to tumor cells with its cognate ligands (PD-L1), thereby inhibiting T cell proliferation and response, suppressing patient immunity and helping tumor immune escape (27). Studies have revealed that PD1/PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer, glioblastoma and lymphoma is associated with patient prognosis (28–31). High PD1 expression has been demonstrated to predict improved prognosis in patients with breast cancer (32). A recent study indicated that PD1 has different effects on the prognosis of different subtypes of lymphoma (33). In the present study, the association between PD1/PD-L1 expression and TACE was also analyzed. After TACE treatment, the mRNA expression levels of both PD1 and PD-L1 were increased, and patients with low PD-L1 mRNA expression had a poor prognosis. This result is consistent with that of Hanna et al (34), which showed the high expression of PD-L1 was associated with a good prognosis in young women with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. It has been reported that PD-L1 upregulation is associated with antitumor inflammatory response induced by CD8 cell infiltration (34,35). However, the effect of TACE treatment on PD-L1 expression and function of immune cells remains unclear. The association between PD-L1 and prognosis and the intrinsic mechanism require further investigation.
In recent years, immunotherapy has developed rapidly and obtained remarkable achievements. Lee et al (36) revealed that the combination of cytokine-induced killer cell therapy with RFA or TACE could improve patient outcomes. Lee et al (37) reported a positive association between PD-L1 and sorafenib resistance. These results suggested that PD-L1 inhibitors combined with sorafenib may be a novel strategy to prevent or overcome sorafenib-acquired resistance in patients with HCC (38). In the present study, the expression levels of PD-L1 and PD1 in patients with poor response were higher than those in patients with good response before TACE treatment. In addition, the mRNA expression levels of both PD1 and PD-L1 were increased after TACE treatment. Therefore, further studies are required to determine the therapeutic effects of TACE and immunotherapy combination strategy.
Although the present results indicated that TACE combined with immunotherapy has potential clinical value for patients with HCC, there were also several limitations in the present study. Firstly, the specific mechanism of the increase in PD1 and PD-L1 in PBMCs was not investigated. As for the mechanism of TACE-induced PD1/PD-L1 mRNA upregulation, related studies have reported that, following chemotherapy and targeted drug treatment, residual tumor cells can restore the stemness and enhance immune escape, which is one of the reasons for the failure of existing treatment models (39–41). Furthermore, residual tumor cells have been demonstrated to reshape the surrounding immune microenvironment by upregulating the levels of inhibitory cytokines, such as IL-1 and MMP family proteins, to force suppressive immune cells in the immune microenvironment to complete the immune escape and promote the recurrence of tumor cells (40,42). Due to abundant blood flow in the liver, suppressive cytokines and immune cells may affect the PD1/PD-L1 levels in peripheral blood lymphocytes (43,44). Further studies will be required to evaluate the intrinsic mechanism. Secondly, the present study used RT-qPCR to detect the expression levels of PD1/PD-L1 instead of flow cytometry based on previous studies (45–47), which performed qPCR to detect the expression levels of PD1/PD-L1, it was hypothesized that qPCR is a reliable way for detecting PD1/PD-L1 expression. However, this meant that the present study only detected the mRNA levels of PD1/PD-L1. In addition, more samples should be included in future studies to determine the effect of TACE treatment on immune function.
In summary, the present data demonstrated that TACE could improve the proportion of CD8+ cells and the mRNA expression level of PD1 in patients with HCC. Before TACE treatment, high PD1 and PD-L1 mRNA levels were significantly associated with poor therapeutic response to TACE. After TACE treatment, high PD-L1 mRNA expression was significantly associated with improved patient prognosis. TACE combined with immunotherapy has potential clinical value for patients with HCC.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Authors' contributions
RW designed the study. YH and ZJ collected and analyzed the data. JG and SW performed the experiments, prepared figures and tables and drafted the manuscript. JG and RW confirmed the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qingdao Sixth People's Hospital (Qingdao, China; approval no. 2013-R-0012). Written informed consent was provided by patients or their guardians prior to the study start.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Park JW, Chen M, Colombo M, Roberts LR, Schwartz M, Chen PJ, Kudo M, Johnson P, Wagner S, Orsini LS, Sherman M. Global patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma management from diagnosis to death: The bridge study. Liver Int. 2015;35:2155–2166. doi: 10.1111/liv.12818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wallace MC, Preen D, Jeffrey GP, Adams LA. The evolving epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: A global perspective. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;9:765–779. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2015.1028363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lei C, Ren D, Fu M, Sun C, Ren H, Pan Q, Li Y. Curative effect of endostar combined with oxaliplatin in the treatment of primary hepatic carcinoma and its influence on immune cells. Oncol Lett. 2019;17:3665–3670. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Trépo C, Chan HL, Lok A. Hepatitis B virus infection. Lancet. 2014;384:2053–2063. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60220-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ichikawa T, Sano K, Morisaka H. Diagnosis of pathologically early HCC with EOB-MRI: Experiences and current consensus. Liver Cancer. 2014;3:97–107. doi: 10.1159/000343865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hartke J, Johnson M, Ghabril M. The diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2017;34:153–159. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2016.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhu ZX, Huang JW, Liao MH, Zeng Y. Treatment strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma in China: Radiofrequency ablation versus liver resection. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46:1075–1080. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tsurusaki M, Murakami T. Surgical and locoregional therapy of HCC: TACE. Liver Cancer. 2015;4:165–175. doi: 10.1159/000367739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Llovet JM, Bruix J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology. 2003;37:429–442. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Raoul JL, Forner A, Bolondi L, Cheung TT, Kloeckner R, de Baere T. Updated use of TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: How and when to use it based on clinical evidence. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019;72:28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ito F, Vardam TD, Appenheimer MM, Eng KH, Gollnick SO, Muhitch JB, Evans SS. In situ thermal ablation augments antitumor efficacy of adoptive T cell therapy. Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(Suppl 1):S22–S36. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1653500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Löffler MW, Nussbaum B, Jäger G, Jurmeister PS, Budczies J, Pereira PL, Clasen S, Kowalewski DJ, Mühlenbruch L, Königsrainer I, et al. A non-interventional clinical trial assessing immune responses after radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2526. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhou J, Sun HC, Wang Z, Cong WM, Wang JH, Zeng MS, Yang JM, Bie P, Liu LX, Wen TF, et al. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer in China (2017 edition) Liver Cancer. 2018;7:235–260. doi: 10.1159/000488035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhao S, Wang M, Yang Z, Tan K, Zheng D, Du X, Liu L. Comparison between child-pugh score and albumin-bilirubin grade in the prognosis of patients with HCC after liver resection using time-dependent ROC. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:539. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shimura S, Odagiri S, Furuya H, Okada K, Ozawa K, Nagase H, Yamaguchi M, Cho Y. Echocardiography-guided aortic cannulation by the Seldinger technique for type A dissection with cerebral malperfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;159:784–793. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.02.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shi B, Sun A, Zhang X. Influence of different ex vivo cell culture methods on the proliferation and anti-tumor activity of cytokine-induced killer cells from gastric cancer patients. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:2657–2672. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S162281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gonzalez H, Hagerling C, Werb Z. Roles of the immune system in cancer: from tumor initiation to metastatic progression. Genes Dev. 2018;32:1267–1284. doi: 10.1101/gad.314617.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wu X, Peng M, Huang B, Zhang H, Wang H, Huang B, Xue Z, Zhang L, Da Y, Yang D, et al. Immune microenvironment profiles of tumor immune equilibrium and immune escape states of mouse sarcoma. Cancer Lett. 2013;340:124–133. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.07.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Quezada SA, Peggs KS, Simpson TR, Allison JP. Shifting the equilibrium in cancer immunoediting: From tumor tolerance to eradication. Immunol Rev. 2011;241:104–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01007.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ferrari SM, Fallahi P, Galdiero MR, Ruffilli I, Elia G, Ragusa F, Paparo SR, Patrizio A, Mazzi V, Varricchi G, et al. Immune and Inflammatory Cells in Thyroid Cancer Microenvironment. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20 doi: 10.3390/ijms20184413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ge P, Wang W, Li L, Zhang G, Gao Z, Tang Z, Dang X, Wu Y. Profiles of immune cell infiltration and immune-related genes in the tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;118:109228. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang Y, Zhu C, Song W, Li J, Zhao G, Cao H. PD-L1 expression and CD8(+) T cell infiltration predict a favorable prognosis in advanced gastric cancer. J Immunol Res. 2018;2018:4180517. doi: 10.1155/2018/4180517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zerbini A, Pilli M, Penna A, Pelosi G, Schianchi C, Molinari A, Schivazappa S, Zibera C, Fagnoni FF, Ferrari C, Missale G. Radiofrequency thermal ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma liver nodules can activate and enhance tumor-specific T-cell responses. Cancer Res. 2006;66:1139–1146. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Darvin P, Toor SM, Nair VS, Elkord E. Immune checkpoint inhibitors: recent progress and potential biomarkers. Exp Mol Med. 2018;50:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s12276-018-0191-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Abril-Rodriguez G, Ribas A. SnapShot: immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Cell. 2017;31:848–848 e841. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mazieres J, Drilon A, Lusque A, Mhanna L, Cortot AB, Mezquita L, Thai AA, Mascaux C, Couraud S, Veillon R, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with advanced lung cancer and oncogenic driver alterations: Results from the IMMUNOTARGET registry. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:1321–1328. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wang Z, Zhang C, Liu X, Wang Z, Sun L, Li G, Liang J, Hu H, Liu Y, Zhang W, Jiang T. Molecular and clinical characterization of PD-L1 expression at transcriptional level via 976 samples of brain glioma. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5:e1196310. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1196310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Veloza L, Teixido C, Castrejon N, Climent F, Carrió A, Marginet M, Soldini D, González-Farré B, Ribera-Cortada I, Lopez-Guillermo A, et al. Clinicopathological evaluation of the programmed cell death 1 (PD1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders: Association with Epstein-Barr virus, PD-L1 copy number alterations, and outcome. Histopathology. 2019;75:799–812. doi: 10.1111/his.13857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ferrara R, Mezquita L, Texier M, Lahmar J, Audigier-Valette C, Tessonnier L, Mazieres J, Zalcman G, Brosseau S, Le Moulec S, et al. Hyperprogressive disease in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors or with single-agent chemotherapy. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1543–1552. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jiang C, Cao S, Li N, Jiang L, Sun T. PD-1 and PD-L1 correlated gene expression profiles and their association with clinical outcomes of breast cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2019;19:233. doi: 10.1186/s12935-019-0955-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Xie M, Huang X, Ye X, Qian W. Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of PD-1/PD-L1 expression in the tumor microenvironment and neoplastic cells for lymphoma. Int Immunopharmacol. 2019;77:105999. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hanna GJ, Woo SB, Li YY, Barletta JA, Hammerman PS, Lorch JH. Tumor PD-L1 expression is associated with improved survival and lower recurrence risk in young women with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47:568–577. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dong H, Strome SE, Salomao DR, Tamura H, Hirano F, Flies DB, Roche PC, Lu J, Zhu G, Tamada K, et al. Tumor-associated B7-H1 promotes T-cell apoptosis: A potential mechanism of immune evasion. Nat Med. 2002;8:793–800. doi: 10.1038/nm0902-1039c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lee JH, Lee JH, Lim YS, Yeon JE, Song TJ, Yu SJ, Gwak GY, Kim KM, Kim YJ, Lee JW, Yoon JH. Adjuvant immunotherapy with autologous cytokine-induced killer cells for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:1383–1391.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.02.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lee JH, Lee JH, Lim YS, Yeon JE, Song TJ, Yu SJ, Gwak GY, Kim KM, Kim YJ, Lee JW, Yoon JH. Sustained efficacy of adjuvant immunotherapy with cytokine-induced killer cells for hepatocellular carcinoma: An extended 5-year follow-up. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2018;68:23–32. doi: 10.1007/s00262-018-2247-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liu J, Liu Y, Meng L, Liu K, Ji B. Targeting the PD-L1/DNMT1 axis in acquired resistance to sorafenib in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2017;38:899–907. doi: 10.3892/or.2017.5722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Naruse T, Yanamoto S, Okuyama K, Ohmori K, Tsuchihashi H, Furukawa K, Yamada SI, Umeda M. Immunohistochemical study of PD-1/PD-L1 axis expression in oral tongue squamous cell carcinomas: Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on local recurrence. Pathol Oncol Res. 2020;26:735–742. doi: 10.1007/s12253-019-00606-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Walcher L, Kistenmacher AK, Suo H, Dluczek S, Strauß A, Blaudszun AR, Yevsa T, Fricke S, Kossatz-Boehlert U. Cancer stem cells-origins and biomarkers: Perspectives for targeted personalized therapies. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1280. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Oh SJ, Ahn EJ, Kim O, Kim D, Jung TY, Jung S, Lee JH, Kim KK, Kim H, Kim EH, et al. The role played by SLUG, an epithelial-mesenchymal transition factor, in invasion and therapeutic resistance of malignant glioma. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2019;39:769–782. doi: 10.1007/s10571-019-00677-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Peng J, Hamanishi J, Matsumura N, Abiko K, Murat K, Baba T, Yamaguchi K, Horikawa N, Hosoe Y, Murphy SK, et al. Chemotherapy induces programmed cell death-ligand 1 overexpression via the nuclear factor-κB to foster an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2015;75:5034–5045. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Baraibar I, Melero I, Ponz-Sarvise M, Castanon E. Safety and tolerability of immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1 and PD-L1) in cancer. Drug Saf. 2019;42:281–294. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0774-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chen S, Crabill GA, Pritchard TS, McMiller TL, Wei P, Pardoll DM, Pan F, Topalian SL. Mechanisms regulating PD-L1 expression on tumor and immune cells. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:305. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0770-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ma LJ, Feng FL, Dong LQ, Zhang Z, Duan M, Liu LZ, Shi JY, Yang LX, Wang ZC, Zhang S, et al. Clinical significance of PD-1/PD-Ls gene amplification and overexpression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Theranostics. 2018;8:5690–5702. doi: 10.7150/thno.28742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kawahara T, Ishiguro Y, Ohtake S, Kato I, Ito Y, Ito H, Makiyama K, Kondo K, Miyoshi Y, Yumura Y, et al. PD-1 and PD-L1 are more highly expressed in high-grade bladder cancer than in low-grade cases: PD-L1 might function as a mediator of stage progression in bladder cancer. BMC Urol. 2018;18:97. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0414-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.D'Alterio C, Nasti G, Polimeno M, Ottaiano A, Conson M, Circelli L, Botti G, Scognamiglio G, Santagata S, De Divitiis C, et al. CXCR4-CXCL12-CXCR7, TLR2-TLR4, and PD-1/PD-L1 in colorectal cancer liver metastases from neoadjuvant-treated patients. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5:e1254313. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1254313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.