There is an error in the reference numbering in a research article by Michael Mondloch and associates.1 In Tables 2 and 3, the numbering for references 12 to 26 should be increased by 1 (i.e., these references should be numbered 13 to 27).
Reference
- 1.Mondloch MV, Cole DC, Frank JW. Does how you do depend on how you think you'll do? A systemic review of the evidence for a relation between patients' recovery expectations and health outcomes. CMAJ 2001;165(2):174-9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]