Skip to main content
The ISME Journal logoLink to The ISME Journal
. 2021 Jan 15;15(6):1680–1694. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-00879-6

Bodo saltans (Kinetoplastida) is dependent on a novel Paracaedibacter-like endosymbiont that possesses multiple putative toxin-antitoxin systems

Samriti Midha 1,, Daniel J Rigden 2, Stefanos Siozios 1, Gregory D D Hurst 1, Andrew P Jackson 1
PMCID: PMC8163844  PMID: 33452479

Abstract

Bacterial endosymbiosis has been instrumental in eukaryotic evolution, and includes both mutualistic, dependent and parasitic associations. Here we characterize an intracellular bacterium inhabiting the flagellated protist Bodo saltans (Kinetoplastida). We present a complete bacterial genome comprising a 1.39 Mb circular chromosome with 40.6% GC content. Fluorescent in situ hybridisation confirms that the endosymbiont is located adjacent to the nuclear membrane, and a detailed model of its intracellular niche is generated using serial block-face scanning electron microscopy. Phylogenomic analysis shows that the endosymbiont belongs to the Holosporales, most closely related to other α-proteobacterial endosymbionts of ciliates and amoebae. Comparative genomics indicates that it has a limited metabolism and is nutritionally host-dependent. However, the endosymbiont genome does encode diverse symbiont-specific secretory proteins, including a type VI secretion system and three separate toxin-antitoxin systems. We show that these systems are actively transcribed and hypothesize they represent a mechanism by which B. saltans becomes addicted to its endosymbiont. Consistent with this idea, attempts to cure Bodo of endosymbionts led to rapid and uniform cell death. This study adds kinetoplastid flagellates to ciliates and amoebae as hosts of Paracaedibacter-like bacteria, suggesting that these antagonistic endosymbioses became established very early in Eukaryotic evolution.

Subject terms: Microbial ecology, Bacteria

Introduction

Eukaryotes commonly live in intimate associations with microbes [1]. For microeukaryotes, intracellular microbes live as endosymbionts passing to progeny cells following fission [2], whereas endosymbionts of multicellular species live within host tissues and pass to progeny during reproduction, commonly inside eggs [3]. Heritable host-microbe interactions have arisen multiple times and involve diverse eubacteria and life strategies [4].

The impact of endosymbioses on host and microbe vary widely. In some cases, the host captures a microbe for its own benefit. For instance, Paramecium captures Chlorella algae from the environment, utilises them to facilitate a mixotrophic rather than heterotrophic lifestyle, but controls symbiont numbers such that Chlorella replication is higher when free-living than in the symbiotic state [5]. In other cases, the microbe can be parasitic. This can occur when the symbiont is biparentally inherited, or uniparentally inherited, when it distorts reproduction towards the transmitting sex, for example with Wolbachia [6]. Finally, and perhaps most commonly, symbiont and host mutually benefit from the interaction. For instance, symbionts such as Buchnera and Euplotes provide protective and nutritional benefits to their host that promote host survival and reproduction, and in doing so increase their fitness [7].

In many cases, host survival and reproduction depend on functions provided by the symbiont. For instance, loss of the anabolic capacity of Buchnera leaves their aphid host with insufficient essential amino acids that causes host sterility [7, 8]. Host dependency may be due also to coadaptation of cellular and developmental processes [9]. The defensive Burkholderia symbiont of the fungus Rhizopus is required for completion of the host’s sexual phase [10], a system mirroring the requirement of Asobara tabida wasps for one of their Wolbachia symbionts to complete oogenesis [11]. In these cases, coadaptation over deep evolutionary time to the presence of the symbiont means that the host fails when the symbiont is removed, irrespective of any benefit the symbiont might confer.

There is another potential route to dependency that arises through selection on the symbiont to addict the host to its presence. Addiction mechanisms using toxin-antitoxin systems are a common retention mechanism for plasmids in bacteria [12] and are also observed in a variety of selfish genetic elements, such as the peel-zeel system of C. elegans [13]. These systems typically function through delivery of a long-lived toxin molecule alongside an antitoxin with a shorter half-life. Should the element carrying the system not be inherited then the toxin becomes active and kills the non-bearer individual. Bacterial endosymbionts are currently not known to addict hosts through toxin-antitoxin systems, although they are known to exploit similar ‘rescue’ based systems in creating the phenotype of cytoplasmic incompatibility [13, 14].

In this study, we investigated the symbiosis between the flagellate Bodo saltans (Kinetoplastida) and its intracellular bacterial symbiont. B. saltans is a heterotrophic, phagocytic bacteriovore found in freshwater and marine habitats worldwide, and is among the closest free-living relatives of trypanosomatid parasites [15]. Within the trypanosomatids, three parasitic lineages, Novymonas, Phytomonas and the Strigomonadinae, are known to contain a β-proteobacterial symbionts [1619]. These symbionts are mutualistic, cooperating in various metabolic pathways that provide essential amino acids and vitamins to the host [2022]. Although these endosymbionts are all mutualists, it is clear that parasitic kinetoplastids have acquired endosymbionts independently and relatively often [23]. B. saltans is a free-living kinetoplastid, but microscopic examination has established that it too possesses endosymbiotic bacteria [2426], whose precise identity is unknown.

We characterised the cytoplasmic bacterium inhabiting B. saltans, which we name Candidatus Bodocaedibacter vickermanii gen. nov., sp. nov., using a combination of genome sequencing, epifluorescence microscopy and serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM). We then examined the endosymbiont genome sequence for putative function and identified a type VI secretion system and three chromosomal operons that are predicted to function as toxin-antitoxin systems. We therefore tested whether Bodo was dependent on its symbiont, potentially driven by these toxin-antitoxin systems, showing that antibiotic treatment results in rapid death of B. saltans, consistent with an addiction hypothesis.

Material and methods

DNA sequencing and genome assembly

Bodo saltans strain Lake Konstanz cells were grown in 0.05% yeast extract in the presence of Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883 as prey. To exclude extracellular bacteria from the DNA extraction, cells were sorted by size using a BD FACS Aria cell sorter (Becton- Dickinson, USA). DNA was extracted from sorted cells using a Qiagen MagAttract HMW DNA Kit (Qiagen Inc., Germany). DNA quality was assessed using a Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and Nanodrop instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). A 20Kb insert library was prepared and sequenced on the PacBio Sequel platform (Pacific Biosciences, USA). To assess K. pneumoniae contamination, reads were mapped using Bwa v0.7 to the published B. saltans genome sequence (CYKH01000000) and analysed with Samtools v0.1.18 [27]. DNA sequence assembly was carried out using Canu v1.5 [28]. To identify all distinct bacterial sequences present, rRNA reads were filtered using SortMeRNA v2.1 [29], which identified a single candidate endosymbiont. De novo assembly showed the presence of only one contig belonging to the same bacterium with terminal overlaps, indicating a complete circular chromosome. The endosymbiont genome sequence was circularized using the Amos package v3.1.0 [30] and constituent reads were mapped back to check for mis-assembly.

Endosymbiont genome annotation

Genome annotation was carried out using Prokka v1.12 [31] complemented with BLASTp and InterProScan matches obtained using BLAST2GO v5.0 [32]. Presence of prophage sequences were checked with PHAST [33]. Genes containing a canonical signal peptide were predicted with SignalP 4.1 [34]. Proteins with eukaryotic-like domains were identified with EffectiveELD [35]. Secretome P was used to predict genes encoding proteins secreted by non-classical pathway [36]. Membrane transporters were predicted using TransportTP [37] and transporters were classified using the BLAST tool of the Transport Classification DataBase [38]. HHsearch [39] was used to search for distant relationships between putative toxin-antitoxin system components and known structures at the Protein Data Bank (PDB) [40]; or protein families in the Pfam database [41]. Three iterations of jackhmmer [42] searching against the UniClust database [43] were used to generate the sequence profiles for comparison with database entries. 16 S rRNA gene sequences were predicted using RNAmmer v1.2 and EzBioCloud was used for taxonomical identification of the bacterial lineage [44]. Prevalence of this bacteria in diverse ecological environments was searched using IMNGS webserver [45].

Phylogenetic analysis and comparative genomics

OrthoMCL v2.0.9 was used to cluster orthologous genes shared by the Bodo endosymbiont with 12 related alpha-proteobacterial genome sequences [46]. Protein sequences encoded by 187 conserved genes from the 14 bacterial genomes were aligned using ClustalW [47]. Prottest v3.0 was used to check for the optimal amino acid substitution model for phylogeny estimation [48]. An LG + I + G model was applied in RaxML to estimate a maximum likelihood tree with 1000 non-parametric bootstrap replicates [49]. BLAST-based Average Amino Acid Identity (AAI) values amongst the 13 genomes were calculated using AAI calculator [50]. MAPLE 2.3.0 was used to identify and compare the completeness of various metabolic pathways in these endosymbiont genomes [51]. Genomaple 2.3.2 was used to compare the metabolic pathways of endosymbiont and B. saltans [51].

Fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH)

The endosymbiont 16 S rRNA gene sequence was integrated into the SILVA database using the web-based SINA aligner [52, 53]. This alignment was further merged with SILVA Ref NR 99 [54] using the ARB package and the probe design tool was used to select FISH probes specific for the endosymbiont genome [55]. The probes were tested for mismatch analysis using mathFISH, probeCheck and BLAST [56, 57]. B. saltans cells were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde and spotted on 0.1% gelatin-coated slides. Slides were dehydrated with 50%, 80% and 100% ethanol consecutively before hybridisation with the probe (50 ng/µl) at 46 °C. The probe was labelled with cyanine dye (([CY3]CGAAGTGAAATCTACGTCTCCGT)) and hybridized with 15% formamide in three independent replicates. Counterstaining of the cells was achieved using VECTASHIELD Antifade Mounting Medium with DAPI.

Electron microscopy

Cells were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Wt/Vol) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH7.4) in Pelco Biowave (Ted Pella Inc., USA) and washed twice in 0.1 M PB before embedding in 3% agarose. Agarose embedded cell pellets were post-fixed and stained as described previously [58], except for use of 0.1% thiocarbohydrazide as a mordant. For TEM, after UA staining samples were embedded with TAAB medium Premix resin in silicone moulds and Beem capsules. Ultrathin serial section (70–75 nm) were cut on an UC6 ultra-microtome (Leica, Austria) collected on formvar coated copper grids, before viewing at 120KV in a FEI Tecnai G2 Spirit. Images were taken using a MegaView III camera and multiple Image Alignment (MIA) was used to create a high-resolution overview of areas of interest.

For SBF-SEM, cell pellets were embedded with TAAB hard premix resin in plastic dishes. Excess resin was removed before the block was mounted onto a cryo pin, cell side up, using silver conductive epoxy. Targeted trimming created a block face of cells 500 μm × 500 μm. Samples were painted and dissected as previously described [58]. To mitigate charge build up and maximize image quality, imaging conditions were as follows: low vacuum mode with a chamber pressure of 70 Pa. Low accelerating voltage (1.7 kV), dwell time per pixel (14μs), magnification (5040×) pixel size 5.4 nm in x and y, frame width 6144 × 6144, section thickness 100 nm over 104 sections. Amira 6.5.0 was used to analyse the SBF-SEM images and generate a 3D model for the cell.

Attempt to cure the symbiont with antibiotic treatment

Besides B. saltans, two parasitic and asymbiotic kinetoplastids (Trypanosoma theileri and Zelonia costaricensis [59]), and one parasitic kinetoplastid with nutritional endosymbiont (Novymonas esmeraldas [16]) were treated with rifampicin (20 μg/ml), alongside control populations. T. theileri and Z. costaricensis were chosen as representative organisms of Kinetoplastida certain to be without endosymbionts. Their inclusion in this analysis was to show that the rifampicin effect we observed on Bodo, is not a general feature of kinetoplastids. To avoid impacts of rifampicin on Bodo mediated through changes in bacterial prey abundance, a rif-resistant prey strain of Klebsiella was developed for these experiments. The number of kinetoplastid cells was counted at 0 h and after 24 h of treatment in non-treated and treated flasks. The experiment was repeated three times and statistical significance of changes in cell number between species were analysed using ratio paired T-test. This antibiotic treatment experiment was repeated using streptomycin (100 μg/ml) on B. saltans (in the presence of strep-resistant Klebsiella) and N. esmeraldas. For these experiments, rifampicin (100 mg/ml) and streptomycin (100 mg/ml) stock solutions were prepared in DMSO and H2O respectively and diluted in 0.05% yeast extract media.

Bodo saltans RNA-sequencing

B. saltans cells were treated with gentamicin (50 μg/ml) before RNA extraction to get rid of extracellular bacteria. Total RNA was extracted from cells and rRNA depleted using RiboZero rRNA depletion kit (Epidemiology). A strand-specific library was constructed with the NEBNext Ultra Directional RNA library preparation kit (NEB, UK). Paired end 2 × 150 bp sequencing was carried out on the HiSeq 4000 platform (Illumina, USA). Raw reads were mapped on to the endosymbiont genome sequence using bwa v0.7.12 and low quality read alignments were removed using samclip (https://github.com/tseemann/samclip) and default parameters. Sort read alignments were visualised with the IGV 2.8.6 tool, while strand-specific read quantitation was performed with the SeqMonk program (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/seqmonk/). To account for the presence of low DNA contamination in our library, a Difference Quantitation correction was applied. Read counts for each gene were calculated as the read counts originated from the opposite strand (template strand) minus the read counts from the same strand (coding strand) and normalized to the length of each gene (RPK).

Results

A Bodo saltans endosymbiont of the Holosporales

A single PacBio Sequel sequencing run generated 697,281 reads; of these, ~78% mapped to the B. saltans genome. Multiple proteobacterial genomes were discovered among the assembled contigs (Supplementary Fig. 1). Analysis of prokaryotic rRNA reads identified four bacterial taxa; Klebsiella, Cupriavidus, Delftia (each 100% identical with environmental sequences and assumed to derive from prey bacteria in the cell culture), and an unknown bacterium with greatest sequence identity (98.6%) to uncultured bacterial sequences belonging to Family Paracaedibacteraceae, followed by Paracaedibacter (86.9%). Given the symbiotic association of Family Paracaedibacteraceae with other protists and low sequence identity of this taxon with any defined genus, we propose that it represents the endosymbiont and hereafter refer to it as Candidatus Bodocaedibacter vickermanii (Cbv) sp. nov. (vic.ker.ma’ni.i. N.L. gen. n. vickermanii, named after Keith Vickerman (1933–2016), author of seminal microscopic studies of diverse kinetoplastids, including B. saltans).

We explored various metagenomics datasets for prevalence of this bacterium in diverse environments (Supplementary Table 1). Based on 16 S rRNA gene identity, Ca. B. vickermanii is more abundant in samples extracted from various water sources compared to soil and human origin.

General features of the Candidatus Bodocaedibacter vickermanii genome

The genome containing the Candidatus Bodocaedibacter vickermanii rRNA sequence was assembled as a complete chromosome, 1.39 Mb in size and with an average coverage of 212×. The GC skew graph (Fig. 1A) shows the pattern typical of a complete bacterial chromosome, transitional points referring to the origin and terminus of replication. The genome is 40.7% GC in content and encodes 1214 putative CDS, 40 tRNA and 2 rRNA-encoding operons (both rRNA operons have 16 S and 23 S rRNA genes in close vicinity, separated by two tRNAs). The genome also possesses two incomplete prophage elements (CPBP_00240-CPBP_00250; CPBP_00316-CPBP_00324).

Fig. 1. Annotation features of Bodo endosymbiont.

Fig. 1

A Graphical representation of Candidatus Bodocaedibacter vickermanii (Cbv) genome, generated using DNAPlotter v10.2 [93]. Moving inwards, the tracks represent forward and reverse CDS, tRNAs, type VI secretion system (T6SS) encoding genes, hypothetical proteins (conserved in the Candidatus Paracaedibacteraceae bacterium UBA6184 genome and unique to Cbv), GC (%) plot and GC skew [(G-C)/(G + C)] plot. B Percentage of conserved and unique hypothetical proteins encoded in genome and presence of secretion signal is shown in pie chart. C Cluster of Orthologous Genes (COG) annotation categorization is shown in pie chart. Categories: Energy production and conversion (C), Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning (D), Amino acid transport and metabolism (E), Nucleotide transport and metabolism (F), Carbohydrate transport and metabolism (G), Coenzyme transport and metabolism (H), Lipid transport and metabolism (I), Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (J), Transcription (K), Replication, recombination and repair (L), Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis (M), Cell Motility (N), Post-translational modification, protein turnover, chaperone functions (O), Inorganic ion transport and metabolism (P), Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism (Q), Function Unknown (S), Signal transduction mechanisms (T), Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport (U), Defence mechanisms (V), Extracellular structures (W).

Among sequenced genomes (Table 1), the Ca. B. vickermanii genome sequence is most closely related to a metagenomics sequence assembly from Canadian waste water (UBA6184) [60], and thereafter to various endosymbiont genomes of the Holosporales (86–87% 16 S rRNA gene sequence identity). 27% of gene sequences in the Bodo symbiont genome encode uncharacterized proteins found mostly in Ca. B. vickermanii and the UBA6184 metagenome (Fig. 1B). A majority (~67%) of putative coding sequences were placed into one of 20 functional categories of Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COG), shown in Fig. 1C, while 18% of annotated proteins were categorized as having ‘unknown function’.

Table 1.

List of genomes used in the study: Annotation features, isolation source and accession numbers.

Organism GC content (%) Size (Mb) CDS tRNA rRNA Family Order Phylum Host Isolation source Accession number
Candidatus Caedibacter acanthamoebae 30173 38.2 1.72 1359 42 3 Caedimonadaceae Holosporales Proteobacteria Acanthamoeba polyphaga HN-3 human nasal swab CP008936
Caedibacter varicaedens 42.1 1.69 1726 41 3 Caedimonadaceae Holosporales Proteobacteria Paramecium biaurelia unknown source BBVC00000000
Candidatus Paracaedibacter symbiosus PRA9 41.5 2.66 2199 43 6 Paracaedibacteraceae Holosporales Proteobacteria Acanthamoeba sp. UWET39 soil JQAK00000000
Candidatus Odyssella thessalonicensis L13 42 2.85 2398 40 3 Paracaedibacteraceae Holosporales Proteobacteria Acanthamoeba sp. water from air-conditioning unit AEWF00000000
Candidatus Paracaedibacter acanthamoebae PRA3 41.0 2.47 2154 43 6 Paracaedibacteraceae Holosporales Proteobacteria Acanthamoeba sp. UWC9 contact lens case CP008941
Candidatus Bodocaedibacter vickermanii 40.7 1.39 1214 40 6 Bodocaedibacteraceae fam. nov. Holosporales Proteobacteria Bodo saltans strain Lake Konstanz lake water CP054719 (this study)
Candidatus Paracaedibacteraceae bacterium UBA6184 40.1 1.47 1444 30 Bodocaedibacteraceae fam. nov. Holosporales Proteobacteria MAG, Unknown source waste water DITM00000000
Holospora curviuscula 02AZ16 38.1 1.72 1534 42 3 Holosporaceae Holosporales Proteobacteria Paramecium bursaria unknown source from Astrakhan biosphere reserve PHHC00000000
Holospora obtusa F1 35.2 1.33 1249 36 3 Holosporaceae Holosporales Proteobacteria Paramecium caudatum strain C101 water AWTR00000000
Holospora undulata HU1 36.1 1.40 1460 44 3 Holosporaceae Holosporales Proteobacteria Paramecium caudatum strain 255 lake water ARPM00000000
Holospora elegans E1 36.0 1.27 1454 37 3 Holosporaceae Holosporales Proteobacteria Paramecium caudatum water BAUP00000000
Endosymbiont of Acanthamoeba UWC8 34.8 1.62 1494 36 3 Candidatus Midichloriaceae Rickettsiales Proteobacteria Acanthamoeba sp. ATCC PRA2 human sample CP004403
Candidatus Jidaibacter acanthamoeba UWC36 33.7 2.37 2267 36 3 Candidatus Midichloriaceae Rickettsiales Proteobacteria Acanthamoeba sp. ATCC PRA6 cornea of a keratitis patient JSWE00000000
Magnetococcus marinus MC-1 54.2 4.72 3766 45 9 Magnetococcaceae Magnetococcales Proteobacteria Isolate, free living marine water CP000471

Microscopy indicates this microbe represents an intracellular symbiont

To confirm that the Ca. B. vickermanii sequence is correctly attributed to an intracellular endosymbiont, we used Fluorescent in situ Hybridisation (FISH) and Ca. B. vickermanii 16 S rRNA gene sequence probes. Cy-3 labelled probes bound to bacterial DNA on fixed B. saltans cultures, which were visualized using DIC microscopy (Fig. 2A). Stained B. saltans nuclei and kinetoplast are seen in blue channel (Fig. 2B) and bacterial spots are seen in red channel (Fig. 2C). A merged image from (Fig. 2D) shows that the bacteria are found adjacent to the B. saltans nucleus and are not observed extracellularly.

Fig. 2. Visualization of intracellular bacteria in Bodo saltans.

Fig. 2

Images from Fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) experiment (AD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) experiment (EG) and Serial Block Face-Scanning Electron Microscopy (H, I). Imaging of B. saltans cell cultures with differential interference contrast (A), staining with DAPI to visualize nucleus and kinteoplast (B), FISH staining with endosymbiont specific probe conjugated to Cy3 (C) and images from three channels overlaid (D). Images were acquired on a Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 (Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Germany) equipped with 100×1.4NA objective, 2.5x optovar. Images captured were analyzed using ImageJ v2.0 [94]. Ultrastructure of the B. saltans cell (E) displaying nucleus (nuc), kinetoplast (kp), mitochondria (mt), food vacuole (fv), flagellar pocket (fp) and three intracellular bacteria marked with dark red arrows, endosymbionts showing the presence of an electron lucid halo around cell membrane (F, G). 3D model of B. saltans cellular ultrastructure from two different angles (H, I). Bean shaped B. saltans cell is shown with flagellar pocket (in orange). Nucleus (in yellow) is situated in the centre of the cell and cytobionts (in blue) are distributed in close vicinity to the nucleus. A large, swirled mitochondrion (in magenta) is placed around the periphery of the cell, with a kinetoplast capsule just under the flagellar pocket. Multiple food vacuoles (in green) are present at the posterior end of the cell (colour figure online).

Electron microscopy was used to further define the intracellular niche. In the TEM images (Fig. 2E), a large nucleus surrounded by double membrane occupies the cell centre. The kinetoplast is positioned consistently adjacent to basal bodies. Multiple mitochondrial sections are seen along the cellular periphery. Food vacuoles, enclosing engulfed bacteria, are usually evident towards the posterior end. In addition to these typically kinetoplastid features, we identified rod-shaped bacteria-like structures that are 0.9–1.2 µm in length and 0.3–0.4 µm in diameter and often surrounded by an electron lucid halo (Fig. 2F, G). These are consistent with endosymbiont cells previously observed in B. saltans [25, 26].

3-D models generated from SBF-SEM imaging further resolved the disposition of these rod-shaped structures. Figure 2H-I and supplementary fig. 2 show the bean-shaped B. saltans cell with characteristic kinetoplastid features. In this 3-D rendering, rod-shaped bacterial cells are free in the cytoplasm, close to the nucleus. The number of bacterial cells varied from 3 to 10 (N = 40). Where a higher bacterial count was observed, a membrane enveloping those cells adjacent to the Bodo nucleus was often seen, similar to that previously observed [26]. This could be the nuclear membrane enveloping the endosymbionts prior to cell division and distribution into daughter cells.

Ca. Bodocaedibacter is a novel genus in a clade of alpha-proteobacterial endosymbionts

A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was estimated from an alignment of 187 single-copy core genes from 13 genomes belonging to alpha-proteobacterial endosymbionts of protists of families Paracaedibacteraceae, Caedimonadaceae, Midichloriaceae and Holosporaceae (Table 1). The genome of Magnetococcus marinus, belonging to basal lineage of alpha-proteobacteria, was used as an outgroup. The tree places the Bodo endosymbiont among other Holosporales and Rickettsiales endosymbionts of amoebae and ciliates, forming a clade with Holospora, Caedibacter and Paracaedibacter-like organisms (Fig. 3). As with the 16 S rRNA gene homology analysis, the Ca. B. vickermanii genome grouped most closely with a wastewater metagenome (UBA6184). Branch lengths are long, consistent with these higher-level taxonomic comparisons. We examined the average amino acid identity (AAI) values between the Bodo endosymbiont and the 13 related genomes (Fig. 3) and, with the exception of UBA6184, AAI values for all related genomes are lower than the conventional genus boundary of 55% [61], indicating that Ca. B. vickermanii and UBA6184 represent a novel genus. Ca. B. vickermanii forms a separate clade with UBA6184 genome. Based on their phylogeny and long branch lengths, we assign these two genomes to a novel family Bodocaedibacteraceae fam. nov.

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationships of Candidatus Bodocaedibacter vickermanii and other alpha-proteobacterial endosymbionts of protists.

Fig. 3

A maximum likelihood tree estimated from a concatenated alignment of 187 protein sequences. The tree is rooted with an outgroup (Mcm). Bootstrap values shown on the nodes are calculated from 1000 non-parametric replicates. The scale bar (0.3) is the number of amino acid substitutions per site. Cartoons shown next to tree represent the isolation source (see Table 1 for details). Two columns on the right side depict the average amino acid identity (AAI) and number of orthologous gene clusters shared between Ca. B. vickermanii and each other genome sequence, with the corresponding value as a percentage of all genes shown in brackets.

Analysis of gene content using OrthoMCL [38] shows that these 13 endosymbiotic genomes share a core repertoire of 242 genes, and typically <50% of their total gene repertoire (Fig. 3). Mapping these gene sets to KEGG pathways indicates that many are involved in central metabolism and information processing (Supplementary Fig. 3).

The Ca. B. vickermanii genome has limited metabolic capacity

The KEGG classifications of coding sequences in the Ca. B. vickermanii genome and 12 related endosymbiont sequences show that the Bodo endosymbiont has a small genome and relatively limited metabolic capacity (Table 1). We calculated Module Completion Ratios (MCR) for purine metabolism, pyrimidine metabolism, amino acid metabolism, polyamine biosynthesis, cofactor and vitamin biosynthesis pathways using MAPLE [51] (Supplementary Fig. 4). While often present in related genomes, several of these pathways are either completely or partially absent in Ca. B. vickermanii. For example, it lacks biotin, pantothenate and coenzyme A biosynthesis pathways entirely, and encodes only five out of nine genes in the ubiquinone biosynthesis pathway. Conversely, Ca. B. vickermanii possesses diverse membrane transporter genes for metabolite acquisition. The TransportTP [37] server identified 81 genes encoding membrane transporters in Ca. B. vickermanii, more than Holospora genomes (56–67) but rather fewer than other Caedibacter/Paracaedibacter genomes (102–148).

A full account of all transporter genes, classified using the Transporter Classification Database [38], is shown in Supplementary Table 2. These include genes associated with amino acid transport, metabolite transport (e.g. drug/metabolite transporter (DMT) family (n = 2)), the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) (n = 22), and the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily (n = 27). There are also genes encoding for exporter proteins like the resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) superfamily (n = 6) and the multidrug/oligosaccharidyl-lipid/polysaccharide (MOP) flippase superfamily (n = 4).

B. saltans lacks the ability to synthesize some of the essential amino acids, vitamin and cofactors [62]. We therefore also examined the possibility that metabolic pathways are conducted cooperatively, with component genes being drawn from both host and endosymbiont genomes, which might indicate a mutualism. Only two pathways, lysine and threonine biosynthesis, appeared as potential candidates for co-operation, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 5. These two instances aside, most of the pathways associated with essential amino acids, vitamins and cofactor biosynthesis were lacking in both organisms, quite unlike the mutualistic Novymonas and Strigomonadinae endosymbiosis [2022], indicating that B. saltans remains firmly heterotrophic (Supplementary Fig. 6). Taken together, this does not suggest that Ca. B. vickermanii provides obvious metabolic benefit to B. saltans; indeed, the endosymbiont appears to be nutritionally dependent on its host.

The Ca. B. vickermanii genome encodes a Sec pathway and Type VI Secretion System (T6SS)

We examined the endosymbiont genome for various secretion systems that could facilitate communication with the host. This gram-negative bacterium contains the cellular components for a specific Type VI Secretion System (T6SS) and the general secretion (Sec) pathway. The Ca. B. vickermanii genome encodes most of the essential T6SS components, namely genes associated with membrane complex (tssL and tssM), baseplate complex (tssA, tssE, tssF, tssG, tssK and tssI/vgrG) and tail complex (tssB and tssC). Analysis with InterproScan also identified a tssJ-like gene (CPBP_00933) encoding a T6SS-associated lipoprotein and a gene (CPBP_00987) encoding a putative Hcp-like superfamily protein. RNA-seq analysis confirmed that these genes are actively transcribed, albeit at low levels (Supplementary table 3).

In Bodocaedibacteraceae, Paracaedibacteraceae and Caedimonadaceae genomes T6SS core genes are organised at four or more different genomic locations in a conserved arrangement: [tssG-tssF], [tssB-tssC-hcp], [tssK-tssL-tssM-tssA], and [ywqK-vgrG]. The Ca. B. vickermanii genome complies with this convention (Supplementary Fig. 7), indicating that the system could be functional in Ca. B. vickermanii, as in related endosymbionts [6366].

The web-based server Bastion6 was used to predict for proteins potentially secreted by the T6SS [67]. This machine learning-based algorithm identified 117 proteins as putative type VI secretion effectors (T6SE) (Supplementary Table 4), which included various enzymes, flagellar proteins, membrane proteins and numerous uncharacterized proteins.

The Sec pathway is a major pathway for protein translocation across the cell membrane [68]. The Ca. B. vickermanii genome includes genes for a putative motor protein SecA, translocase complex SecYEG, and the auxillary components SecDF-YajC and YidC. It also encodes the proteins required for co-translational targeting (signal recognition particle proteins and receptor FtsY), as well as post-translational targeting (protein targeting component SecB). To discover proteins that may be targeted by the Sec pathway for integration or secretion outside the cell, we identified 158 coding sequences containing a signal sequence using SignalP 4.1 [34] (Supplementary Table 5). Of these, 105 proteins (66.4%) are uncharacterized and only 21 contain predicted transmembrane helices, indicating that most are probably secreted.

The genes predicted to encode for proteins with a secretion signal include various enzymes (xylanase, serine endoprotease, proteases, phospholipase, methyltransferase and acetyltransferase), flagellar proteins and membrane transporters. They also include two genes encoding proteins containing tetratricopeptide-repeats, and one gene for ankyrin-repeat containing protein, which are both typical eukaryotic protein domains involved in protein-protein interactions. A majority of these genes (130/158) have homologs only in the UBA6184 genome. The 105 genes encoding uncharacterized proteins with secretory signals are also limited to these two bacterial genomes, indicating this lineage has evolved a considerable repertoire of specific secreted proteins.

In case non-classical pathways are used to secrete Ca. B. vickermanii proteins, we analysed predicted protein sequences with SecretomeP [36]. There are 204 proteins that returned a score above the threshold, 59 of which also returned a significant result with SignalP (Supplementary Table 5). Amongst these cases were genes encoding proteins with homology to known cellular toxins, which led to the discovery of three putative novel toxin-antitoxin islands in the Bodo endosymbiont.

Multiple polymorphic toxin systems are a possible mechanism for addiction

Bacterial Polymorphic Toxin Systems (PTS) such as the Rhs [69] and CDI [70] systems comprise genes encoding toxins and their cognate anti-toxins in characteristic operons [71]. Typically, a toxin gene encodes a large multi-domain protein contains an N-terminal secretion signal followed by a toxin domain. A toxin gene is immediately followed by a gene encoding an anti-toxin, (or ‘immunity protein’), capable of neutralising the toxin. This pair is often followed by additional ‘orphan modules’, each encoding an alternative toxin with its cognate antitoxin. Genes in these orphan modules may often contain a repeat region homologous to part of the toxin gene at the beginning of the operon. This repeat enables recombination between the full-length toxin gene and an orphan module to generate an alternative toxin protein.

We identified three genomic regions coding for putative PTS (Fig. 4; Supplementary Table 6). The putative toxin proteins identified here have no structural homology with known proteins, nor is there any homology between the three putative PTS. Nevertheless, the three regions show typical PTS characteristics. These include the presence of regions of homology between putative toxin proteins in the N-terminal part preceding the toxin domains (Fig. 4) and the organisation of putative toxin and antitoxin proteins across the loci (Supplementary Table 6), which leads us to conclude that they may represent novel PTS. In many cases, the relationships used to infer toxin or antitoxin function are characterised by low degrees of sequence identity, but the HHsearch [39] probability scores are all >80% (and often much higher), which supports genuine homology.

Fig. 4. Polymorphic toxin systems in Ca. B. vickermanii.

Fig. 4

Schematic diagrams of the organization of the three predicted polymorphic toxin systems in Ca. B. vickermanii (AC). In each case, the putative, alternative orphan toxin modules are shown downstream of the main multi-domain toxin. Beneath each is a protein multiple sequence alignment of the main toxin C-terminus and the alternative orphan sequences, generated using MAFFT program under default parameters as implemented in Geneious software v6.7. Grey scale gradient represents identical (black), similar (dark grey) and dissimilar (light grey) residues in the alignment based on the Blosum62 score matrix. Note that the specification of orphan modules is least certain for PTS III. Although CPBP_00970 resembles the N-terminus of CPBP_00960, its coding sequence is abbreviated. This, and the metalloprotease (PF03410) match of CPBP_00971 that would, by expected PTS gene positioning encode an antitoxin, argue against this pair of genes representing an orphan module. Another pair of genes that should, by the PTS gene positioning scheme, be an orphan module are CPBP_00964 and CPBP_00965. However, these two sequences are short (75 and 67 residues respectively), homologous (around 34% identical) and CPBP_00964 lacks any homology to the N-terminus of CPBP_00960, arguing against these genes constituting an orphan module.

In PTS I, the full-length toxin (CPBP_00219) terminates in an AHH nuclease domain. Accordingly, the following gene (in the coding direction) CPBP_00218 encodes a protein matching Immunity Protein 43 (Pfam: PF15570), predicted to act as antidote to the nuclease activity [72]. Interestingly, it also strongly matches two Pfam families, Gmx_para_CXXCG (PF09535) and DUF1629 (PF00791), suggesting that these too may encode antitoxins. These genes are followed by two orphan modules, each containing a toxin and an antitoxin (Supplementary Table 6). The next three genes encode proteins without recognisable homology to known structures or protein families, but CPBP_00210 clearly matches Immunity protein 49 (Pfam: PF15575), which is found in other PTS [72]. This suggests, given their context, that CPBP_00213- CPBP_00212 and CPBP_00211- CPBP_00210 may encode third and fourth orphan modules respectively with CPBP_00211 (matching Domain of Unknown Function DUF1837; PF08878) coding for a novel toxin domain.

The full-length toxin of PTS II (encoded by CPBP_00656) contains a Tox-HNH-HHH nuclease domain (PF15637) and is followed by its cognate antitoxin encoded by CPBP_00655. Two orphan modules follow, each containing toxin-antitoxin pairs that are unambiguously homologous to well-characterised families (Supplementary Table 6). However, the CPBP_00654 sequence contains no homology to the predicted N-terminal domain of the CPBP_00656 toxin; therefore, it is unclear whether the CPBP654- CPBP653 orphan module is functional.

Sequence homology in the predicted N-terminal regions of CPBP_00962, CPBP_00966, CPBP_00968, CPBP_00970 and the presumed (given its position) full-length toxin encoded by CPBP_00960 indicate the presence of a third PTS (Fig. 4). Unlike PTS I and II, most predicted proteins at the PTS III locus lack recognisable domains; only CPBP_00966 and CPBP_00967 display homologies to known PTS proteins, a Metallopeptidase toxin 5 (PF15641; [72]), and Colicin-like immunity protein (PF09204) respectively. Thus, the specification of functional orphan modules is least certain for this PTS, and it may be rich in novel toxin and antitoxin genes.

RNA-seq analysis of bulk B. saltans cell culture confirmed that genes comprising the putative PTS systems are all transcribed (Supplementary Table 3; Supplementary fig. 8). A few proteins of each of these polymorphic toxin systems were also predicted as type VI secretion effector in silico (Supplementary Table 4), suggesting the putative role of T6SS in transport and secretion of the involved toxin-antitoxin pairs.

Besides these three PTS, the endosymbiont genome also encodes for a toxin-antitoxin pair associated with T6SS. It has an anti-toxin gene (YwqK family protein), upstream of one of the VgrG genes, as previously observed [63, 73].

Attempts to cure the symbiont result in host death

B. saltans cells were treated with antibiotics to cure them of endosymbiotic bacteria. Treatment with rifampicin (20 μg/ml) led to a decrease in cell count after 24 h of rifampicin treatment compared to the untreated cells. Cell counts from three independent experiments were compared and the difference in cell growth rate was found to be statistically significant (Paired t-test: t = 5.9, d.f. = 2, p = 0.03). By contrast, when the same treatment was applied to cell cultures of two other kinetoplastids that lack endosymbionts (T. theileri and Z. costaricensis), and a kinetoplastid with nutritional endosymbiont (N. esmeraldas [16]) rifampicin had no significant effect on cell number (Fig. 5A). Treatment of B. saltans and N. esmeraldas with streptomycin (100 μg/ml) showed a similar effect as seen with rifampicin treatment (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5. Antibiotic treatment of kinetoplastids with and without endosymbionts.

Fig. 5

Four kinetoplastids were treated with rifampicin and observed for their behaviour on treatment with 20 µg/ml rifampicin (A). B. saltans and N. esmeraldas possess an endosymbiont, while T. theileri and Z. costaricensis do not. Two kinetoplastids, B. saltans and N. esmeraldas were treated with 100 µg/ml streptomycin (B). The graph shows number of cells before treatment (0 h), cells without any treatment (24 h) and with antibiotic treatment (24 h). The bars are average of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was calculated using ratio paired T-test.

Discussion

The B. saltans endosymbiont is identified here as an alpha-proteobacterium and a novel genus of the Holosporales, Ca. Bodocaedibacter. The complete genome indicates that the endosymbiont is incapable of synthesizing essential amino acids, vitamins and cofactors, but instead possesses an arsenal of membrane transporters for importing essential nutrients, a specialized secretory pathway and three putative PTS operons. Antibiotic treatment of B. saltans results in host cell death, consistent with Ca. B. vickermanii being essential for host viability, despite the meagre benefits it seems to offer. Certainly, the Bodo endosymbiont is unrelated, phylogenetically and physiologically, to the obligate bacterial endosymbionts of parasitic kinetoplastids such as Ca. Kinetoplastibacterium (Alcaligenaceae) [17, 74] and Ca. Pandoraea (Burkholderiaceae) [16]. These beta-proteobacterial symbionts can synthesize various essential amino acids independently (Ca. Pandoraea) [20], or in a cooperative manner with the host (Ca. Kinetoplastibacterium) [21], and also provide cofactors, vitamins and heme to their hosts [75]. Since Ca. B. vickermanii lacks the genes to perform such functions, we hypothesize that host dependency in its case arises from the expression of “addictive” bacterial toxin-antitoxin proteins.

This idea is immediately plausible when we consider the ecological strategies of related endosymbionts. While Holospora may increase host survival under adverse conditions [76, 77], it restrains host growth in normal conditions [78, 79]. An Acanthamoeba endosymbiont, Ca. Amoebophilus asiaticus, is parasitic; its genome lacks essential metabolic pathways but instead contains diverse genes shown to modulate host gene expression [64]. Another Acanthamoeba endosymbiont, Ca. Jidaibacter acanthamoeba, also encodes many proteins with eukaryotic-like domains thought to interact with the host [80]. Although the Ca. B. vickermanii genome encodes few eukaryotic-like domains, there are 339 uncharacterized proteins, most of which are lineage-specific and predicted to be secreted; such proteins could include factors for manipulating host physiology.

Perhaps the most pertinent comparison, however, is Caedibacter, an endosymbiont of Paramecium that is known for its ‘Killer trait’, which ensures its transmission at cell division [81]. Caedibacter provides a growth advantage to Paramecium cells [77] but also has an adaptation to ensure its spread through the population. A portion of the endosymbiont population forms ‘R-bodies’ that are secreted outside the host cell, where they are lethal to Paramecium lacking the endosymbiont. In effect, the R-bodies become a toxin, against which Caedibacter provides protection, meaning that this is not a simple mutualism. The phylogenetic position of Ca. B. vickermanii among these various endosymbionts, with their ambiguous relationships with their hosts, makes it plausible that Ca. B. vickermanii too has an antagonistic mechanism for maintaining endosymbiosis.

Mechanisms like these are often described as evolved dependencies, exemplified by selfish genetic elements such as plasmids, which express a toxin-antitoxin (TA) system causing post-segregation killing or addiction [82]. TA systems in bacteria can also lead to programmed cell death [83] or persistence in response to stress conditions [84]. Another evolved dependency involves the wasp Asobara tabida and its symbiont Wolbachia, which the wasp requires for oogenesis and formation of a viable offspring. As Wolbachia is primarily transmitted through females, loss of the same strain of Wolbachia in males can result in cytoplasmic incompatibility, leading to offspring mortality [85, 86]. Similarly, in C. elegans, the peel-zeel system causes offspring to die if they do not carry the same allele as the sperm parent [13]. These instances of evolved dependency on a particular allele (peel-zeel), a genetic element (plasmids), or an endosymbiont (bacteria) carrying the relevant genes are fascinating examples of addiction, where losing the addictive element can lead to host death. The presence in Ca. B. vickermanii of three, actively transcribed PTS and a T6SS that could convey these effector proteins, coupled with an inability to survive in an aposymbiotic state, suggest that B. saltans is also subject to an evolved dependency.

Symbiosis is a well-known and intricate phenomenon found at various levels of biological organization and prokaryotic endosymbionts have been instrumental in the adaptive radiation of eukaryotes [2, 87]. The order Holosporales is associated with diverse protists, including Rhizaria, Excavates, Alveolates and Amoebozoans [8891], and now kinetoplastid flagellates. Given the diversity of their hosts, and the evolutionary distances between them, this alpha-proteobacteria lineage would seem to have been associated with eukaryotes throughout their evolutionary diversification. Like other members of the lineage, the metabolic insufficiency, specialized secretory pathway and toxin-antitoxin systems of the Ca. B. vickermanii genome indicate that this long relationship has not been completely harmonious, the genomes bears witness to a struggle to retain the cooperation of their eukaryotic hosts. Besides, the B. saltans cells are also known to be infected by a giant virus [92]. In such a scenario of infection, the multi-level interactions that can occur between host, symbiont and virus and their impact on host would be another interesting attribute to investigate.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures 1-8 (29.9MB, docx)
Supplementary Table 1 (46.4KB, pdf)
Supplementary Table 2 (92.3KB, pdf)
Supplementary Table 3 (51.2KB, pdf)
Supplementary Table 4 (60.9KB, pdf)
Supplementary Table 5 (204.7KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Table 6 (49.9KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a Leverhulme Trust Research Grant to APJ (RPG-2014-005). We would like to thank Prof. Vyacheslav Yurchenko for kindly providing us Novymonas cultures. We thank Alison Beckett, Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, for helping in electron microscopy studies. We acknowledge Liverpool Centre for Cell Imaging (CCI) for providing access to microscopy equipment and technical assistance. We would also like to thank Prof. Bernhard Schink for Latin name assistance for bacteria.

Data availability

The Candidatus Bodocaedibacter vickermanii genome assembly has been submitted to NCBI under accession number CP054719. Raw PacBio genomic reads and Illumna RNA-Seq reads were submitted to Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database under the accession number SRR11932788 and SRR11935165 respectively.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version of this article (10.1038/s41396-020-00879-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

  • 1.Bennett GM, Moran NA. Heritable symbiosis: the advantages and perils of an evolutionary rabbit hole. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:10169–76. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421388112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nowack EC, Melkonian M. Endosymbiotic associations within protists. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010;365:699–712. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bright M, Bulgheresi S. A complex journey: transmission of microbial symbionts. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:218–30. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yurchenko V, Lukeš J. Parasites and their (endo) symbiotic microbes. Parasitology. 2018;145:1261–4. doi: 10.1017/S0031182018001257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lowe CD, Minter EJ, Cameron DD, Brockhurst MA. Shining a light on exploitative host control in a photosynthetic endosymbiosis. Curr Biol. 2016;26:207–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hurst GD, Frost CL. Reproductive parasitism: maternally inherited symbionts in a biparental world. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7:a017699. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Douglas A. Nutritional interactions in insect-microbial symbioses: aphids and their symbiotic bacteria Buchnera. Annu Rev Entomol. 1998;43:17–37. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Houk E, Griffiths GW. Intracellular symbiotes of the Homoptera. Annu Rev Entomol. 1980;25:161–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Miller IM. Bacterial leaf nodule symbiosis. In: Callow JA (eds). Advances in botanical research. Academic Press; 1990. pp 163–234.
  • 10.Lackner G, Partida-Martinez LP, Hertweck C. Endofungal bacteria as producers of mycotoxins. Trends Microbiol. 2009;17:570–6. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2009.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dedeine F, Vavre F, Fleury F, Loppin B, Hochberg ME, Boulétreau M. Removing symbiotic Wolbachia bacteria specifically inhibits oogenesis in a parasitic wasp. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:6247–52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.101304298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yarmolinsky MB. Programmed cell death in bacterial populations. Science. 1995;267:836–7. doi: 10.1126/science.7846528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Seidel HS, Ailion M, Li J, van Oudenaarden A, Rockman MV, Kruglyak L. A novel sperm-delivered toxin causes late-stage embryo lethality and transmission ratio distortion in C. elegans. PLoS Biol. 2011;9:e1001115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shropshire JD, On J, Layton EM, Zhou H, Bordenstein SR. One prophage WO gene rescues cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:4987–91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800650115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hughes AL, Piontkivska H. Phylogeny of Trypanosomatidae and Bodonidae (Kinetoplastida) based on 18S rRNA: evidence for paraphyly of Trypanosoma and six other genera. Mol Biol Evol. 2003;20:644–52. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kostygov AY, Dobáková E, Grybchuk-Ieremenko A, Váhala D, Maslov DA, Votýpka J, et al. Novel trypanosomatid-bacterium association: evolution of endosymbiosis in action. mBio. 2016;7:e01985–15.. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01985-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Teixeira MM, Borghesan TC, Ferreira RC, Santos MA, Takata CS, Campaner M, et al. Phylogenetic validation of the genera Angomonas and Strigomonas of trypanosomatids harboring bacterial endosymbionts with the description of new species of trypanosomatids and of proteobacterial symbionts. Protist. 2011;162:503–24. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2011.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Alves JM, Serrano MG, Maia da Silva F, Voegtly LJ, Matveyev AV, Teixeira MM, et al. Genome evolution and phylogenomic analysis of Candidatus Kinetoplastibacterium, the betaproteobacterial endosymbionts of Strigomonas and Angomonas. Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5:338–50. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evt012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ganyukova AI, Frolov AO, Malysheva MN, Spodareva VV, Yurchenko V, Kostygov AY. A novel endosymbiont-containing trypanosomatid Phytomonas borealis sp. n. from the predatory bug Picromerus bidens (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) Folia Parasitol (Praha). 2020;67:004. doi: 10.14411/fp.2020.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kostygov AY, Butenko A, Nenarokova A, Tashyreva D, Flegontov P, Lukeš J, et al. Genome of Ca. Pandoraea novymonadis, an endosymbiotic bacterium of the trypanosomatid Novymonas esmeraldas. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1940. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Alves JM, Klein CC, da Silva FM, Costa-Martins AG, Serrano MG, Buck GA, et al. Endosymbiosis in trypanosomatids: the genomic cooperation between bacterium and host in the synthesis of essential amino acids is heavily influenced by multiple horizontal gene transfers. BMC Evol Biol. 2013;13:190. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Klein CC, Alves JM, Serrano MG, Buck GA, Vasconcelos ATR, Sagot M-F, et al. Biosynthesis of vitamins and cofactors in bacterium-harbouring trypanosomatids depends on the symbiotic association as revealed by genomic analyses. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e79786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Harmer J, Yurchenko V, Nenarokova A, Lukeš J, Ginger ML. Farming, slaving and enslavement: histories of endosymbioses during kinetoplastid evolution. Parasitology. 2018;145:1311–23. doi: 10.1017/S0031182018000781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vickerman K, Preston TM. Comparative cell biology of the kinetoplastid flagellates. In: Lumsden WHR, Evans DA (eds). Biology of the kinetoplastida. New York: Academic Press; 1976, pp 35–130.
  • 25.Burzell LA. Fine structure of Bodo curvifilus Griessmann (Kinetoplastida: Bodonidae) J Protozool. 1975;22:35–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Malysheva M, Karpova M, Frolov A. Mitosis of the free-living flagellate Bodo saltans strain Ps+ (Kinetoplastidea, Bodonida) Cell Tiss Biol. 2007;1:364–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017;27:722–36. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kopylova E, Noé L, Touzet H. SortMeRNA: fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3211–7. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Treangen TJ, Sommer DD, Angly FE, Koren S, Pop M. Next generation sequence assembly with AMOS. Curr Protoc Bioinforma. 2011;33:11.8.1–11.8.18. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi1108s33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics . 2014;30:2068–9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3674–6. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhou Y, Liang Y, Lynch KH, Dennis JJ, Wishart DS. PHAST: a fast phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39( Suppl_2):W347–W352. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Petersen TN, Brunak S, Von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods. 2011;8:785–6. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Eichinger V, Nussbaumer T, Platzer A, Jehl M-A, Arnold R, Rattei T. EffectiveDB—updates and novel features for a better annotation of bacterial secreted proteins and type III, IV, VI secretion systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D669–D674. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bendtsen JD, Kiemer L, Fausbøll A, Brunak S. Non-classical protein secretion in bacteria. BMC Microbiol. 2005;5:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-5-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li H, Benedito VA, Udvardi MK, Zhao PX. TransportTP: a two-phase classification approach for membrane transporter prediction and characterization. BMC Bioinforma. 2009;10:418. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Saier MH, Jr, Tran CV, Barabote RD. TCDB: the Transporter Classification Database for membrane transport protein analyses and information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(suppl_1):D181–D186. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Söding J. Protein homology detection by HMM–HMM comparison. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:951–60. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.wwPDBconsortium. Protein Data Bank: the single global archive for 3D macromolecular structure data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D520–D528. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.El-Gebali S, Mistry J, Bateman A, Eddy SR, Luciani A, Potter SC, et al. The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D427–D432. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Eddy SR. A new generation of homology search tools based on probabilistic inference. Genome Inform. 2009;23:205–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mirdita M, von den Driesch L, Galiez C, Martin MJ, Söding J, Steinegger M. Uniclust databases of clustered and deeply annotated protein sequences and alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D170–D176. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, Seo H, et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:1613–7. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lagkouvardos I, Joseph D, Kapfhammer M, Giritli S, Horn M, Haller D, et al. IMNGS: a comprehensive open resource of processed 16S rRNA microbial profiles for ecology and diversity studies. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33721. doi: 10.1038/srep33721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li L, Stoeckert CJ, Roos DS. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 2003;13:2178–89. doi: 10.1101/gr.1224503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX. Curr Protoc Bioinforma. 2003;00:2.3.1–2.3.22. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0203s00. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. ProtTest 3: fast selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1164–5. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–3. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Prepr. 2016;4:e1900v1. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Arai W, Taniguchi T, Goto S, Moriya Y, Uehara H, Takemoto K, et al. MAPLE 2.3. 0: an improved system for evaluating the functionomes of genomes and metagenomes. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2018;82:1515–7. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2018.1476122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pruesse E, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. SINA: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1823–9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, et al. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:7188–96. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, Yadhukumar, et al. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1363–71. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Loy A, Arnold R, Tischler P, Rattei T, Wagner M, Horn M. probeCheck–a central resource for evaluating oligonucleotide probe coverage and specificity. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:2894–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01706.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Yilmaz LS, Parnerkar S, Noguera DR. mathFISH, a web tool that uses thermodynamics-based mathematical models for in silico evaluation of oligonucleotide probes for fluorescence in situ hybridization. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:1118–22. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01733-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Booth DG, Beckett AJ, Molina O, Samejima I, Masumoto H, Kouprina N, et al. 3D-CLEM reveals that a major portion of mitotic chromosomes is not chromatin. Mol Cell. 2016;64:790–802. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kostygov AY, Yurchenko V. Revised classification of the subfamily Leishmaniinae (Trypanosomatidae) Folia Parasitol (Praha) 2017;64:020. doi: 10.14411/fp.2017.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Parks DH, Rinke C, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil P-A, Woodcroft BJ, Evans PN, et al. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2:1533–42. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0012-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. Bypassing cultivation to identify bacterial species. Microbe. 2014;9:111–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Opperdoes FR, Butenko A, Flegontov P, Yurchenko V, Lukeš J. Comparative metabolism of free‐living Bodo saltans and parasitic trypanosomatids. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2016;63:657–78. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.George EE, Husnik F, Tashyreva D, Prokopchuk G, Horák A, Kwong WK, et al. Highly reduced genomes of protist endosymbionts show evolutionary convergence. Curr Biol. 2020;30:925–33.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Schmitz-Esser S, Tischler P, Arnold R, Montanaro J, Wagner M, Rattei T, et al. The genome of the amoeba symbiont “Candidatus Amoebophilus asiaticus” reveals common mechanisms for host cell interaction among amoeba-associated bacteria. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:1045–57. doi: 10.1128/JB.01379-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Brown A, Wasala SK, Howe DK, Peetz AB, Zasada IA, Denver DR. Comparative genomics of Wolbachia–Cardinium dual endosymbiosis in a plant-parasitic nematode. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2482. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Yang JC, Madupu R, Durkin AS, Ekborg NA, Pedamallu CS, Hostetler JB, et al. The complete genome of Teredinibacter turnerae T7901: an intracellular endosymbiont of marine wood-boring bivalves (shipworms) PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e6085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Wang J, Yang B, Leier A, Marquez-Lago TT, Hayashida M, Rocker A, et al. Bastion6: a bioinformatics approach for accurate prediction of type VI secreted effectors. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:2546–55. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Natale P, Brüser T, Driessen AJ. Sec-and Tat-mediated protein secretion across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane—distinct translocases and mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1778:1735–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Jackson AP, Thomas GH, Parkhill J, Thomson NR. Evolutionary diversification of an ancient gene family (rhs) through C-terminal displacement. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:584. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ruhe ZC, Low DA, Hayes CS. Bacterial contact-dependent growth inhibition. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21:230–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2013.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Jamet A, Nassif X. New players in the toxin field: polymorphic toxin systems in bacteria. mBio. 2015;6:e00285–15.. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00285-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zhang D, de Souza RF, Anantharaman V, Iyer LM, Aravind L. Polymorphic toxin systems: comprehensive characterization of trafficking modes, processing, mechanisms of action, immunity and ecology using comparative genomics. Biol Direct. 2012;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-7-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ibrahim M, Subramanian A, Anishetty S. Comparative pan genome analysis of oral Prevotella species implicated in periodontitis. Funct Integr Genomics. 2017;17:513–36. doi: 10.1007/s10142-017-0550-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Votýpka J, Kostygov AY, Kraeva N, Grybchuk-Ieremenko A, Tesařová M, Grybchuk D, et al. Kentomonas gen. n., a new genus of endosymbiont-containing trypanosomatids of Strigomonadinae subfam. n. Protist. 2014;165:825–38. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2014.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Alves JM, Voegtly L, Matveyev AV, Lara AM, da Silva FM, Serrano MG, et al. Identification and phylogenetic analysis of heme synthesis genes in trypanosomatids and their bacterial endosymbionts. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e23518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Fujishima M, Kawai M, Yamamoto R. Paramecium caudatum acquires heat-shock resistance in ciliary movement by infection with the endonuclear symbiotic bacterium Holospora obtusa. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;243:101–5. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.11.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Fujishima M Infection and maintenance of Holospora species in Paramecium caudatum. In: Fujishima M (eds). Endosymbionts in Paramecium. Microbiology Monographs, vol 12. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. pp. 201–25.
  • 78.Görtz H, Fujishima M. Conjugation and meiosis of Paramecium caudatum infected with the micronucleus-specific bacterium Holospora elegans. Eur J Cell Biol. 1983;32:86–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Restif O, Kaltz O. Condition‐dependent virulence in a horizontally and vertically transmitted bacterial parasite. Oikos. 2006;114:148–58. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Schulz F, Martijn J, Wascher F, Lagkouvardos I, Kostanjšek R, Ettema TJ, et al. A Rickettsiales symbiont of amoebae with ancient features. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:2326–42. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kusch J, Görtz HD Towards an understanding of the killer trait: Caedibacter endocytobionts in Paramecium. In: Overmann J (eds). Molecular Basis of Symbiosis. Prog Mol Subcell Biol., vol 41. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 2005, pp 61-76. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 82.Werren JH. Selfish genetic elements, genetic conflict, and evolutionary innovation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(Supplement 2):10863–70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102343108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Engelberg-Kulka H, Hazan R, Amitai S. mazEF: a chromosomal toxin-antitoxin module that triggers programmed cell death in bacteria. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:4327–32. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Page R, Peti W. Toxin-antitoxin systems in bacterial growth arrest and persistence. Nat Chem Biol. 2016;12:208–14. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Dedeine F, Bouletreau M, Vavre F. Wolbachia requirement for oogenesis: occurrence within the genus Asobara (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) and evidence for intraspecific variation in A. tabida. Heredity. 2005;95:394–400. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Dedeine F, Vavre F, Shoemaker DD, Boulétreau M. Intra‐individual coexistence of a Wolbachia strain required for host oogenesis with two strains inducing cytoplasmic incompatibility in the wasp Asobara tabida. Evolution. 2004;58:2167–74. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01595.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Aanen DK, Hoekstra RF. The evolution of obligate mutualism: if you can’t beat’em, join’em. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007;22:506–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Hess S, Suthaus A, Melkonian M. “Candidatus Finniella”(Rickettsiales, Alphaproteobacteria), novel endosymbionts of viridiraptorid amoeboflagellates (Cercozoa, rhizaria) Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:659–70. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02680-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Georgiades K, Madoui M-A. Phuong Le CR, Raoult D. Phylogenomic analysis of Odyssella thessalonicensis fortifies the common origin of Rickettsiales, Pelagibacter ubique and Reclimonas americana mitochondrion. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e24857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kim E, Park JS, Simpson AG, Matsunaga S, Watanabe M, Murakami A, et al. Complex array of endobionts in Petalomonas sphagnophila, a large heterotrophic euglenid protist from Sphagnum-dominated peatlands. ISME J. 2010;4:1108–20. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Schrallhammer M, Castelli M, Petroni G. Phylogenetic relationships among endosymbiotic R-body producer: bacteria providing their host the killer trait. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2018;41:213–20. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2018.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Deeg CM, Chow C-ET, Suttle CA. The kinetoplastid-infecting Bodo saltans virus (BsV), a window into the most abundant giant viruses in the sea. Elife. 2018;7:e33014. doi: 10.7554/eLife.33014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Carver T, Thomson N, Bleasby A, Berriman M, Parkhill J. DNAPlotter: circular and linear interactive genome visualization. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:119–20. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–82. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures 1-8 (29.9MB, docx)
Supplementary Table 1 (46.4KB, pdf)
Supplementary Table 2 (92.3KB, pdf)
Supplementary Table 3 (51.2KB, pdf)
Supplementary Table 4 (60.9KB, pdf)
Supplementary Table 5 (204.7KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Table 6 (49.9KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The Candidatus Bodocaedibacter vickermanii genome assembly has been submitted to NCBI under accession number CP054719. Raw PacBio genomic reads and Illumna RNA-Seq reads were submitted to Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database under the accession number SRR11932788 and SRR11935165 respectively.


Articles from The ISME Journal are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES