Abstract
Ropivacaine is a long-acting amide local anaesthetic agent which has a significant vasoconstrictive property, long duration of action, least central nervous system and cardiac complications due to the pure (S)-enantiomer property by reversible inhibition of sodium ion influx in nerve fibres. By using additives the duration of analgesia may be prolonged. Ropivacaine has been used routinely in our otorhinolaryngology procedures since 2010 (10 years). The present article details the clinical applications of ropivacaine and its current place as a local anaesthetic in otorhinolaryngology practice.
Keywords: Anaesthesia, Regional anaesthetic, Ropivacaine, ENT surgeries
Introduction
Ropivacaine is a versatile local anaesthetic drug to use in otorhinolaryngology practice, compared to other routinely used drugs like bupivacaine and lidocaine for local infiltration and nerve blocks. By itself it has a significant vasoconstrictive property, long duration of action and in case of overdose central nervous system (CNS) & cardiac complications of ropivacaine are the least because of its pure (S)-enantiomer property. By using additives the duration of analgesia may be prolonged. Ropivacaine has been used routinely in our otorhinolaryngology procedures since 2010 (10 years).
About Ropivacaine
Ropivacaine (1′-propyl-2,6-pipecolo-xylide hydrochloride monohydrate) is a long-lasting local anaesthetic belonging to the amide group family of injectable local anaesthetics. Ropivacaine, a pure S (–) enantiomer of the mepivacaine family, is an optically active isomer [1].
Ropivacaine was evaluated in clinical trials starting in 1990 and introduced clinically in 1996. Ropivacaine may also be similar acting like bupivacaine, with useful drug concentrations ranging from 0.2 to 1%. Ropivacaine has been developed and presented as alternative, long-acting local anaesthetics with the desirable blocking properties of racemic bupivacaine and lidocaine but a greater margin of safety due to their reduced toxic potential as compared to other two drugs. Low pKa (acid dissociation constant—stronger acid) and high lipid solubility of local anaesthetic drug favoured Group Aδ over Group C nerve fibre block [2] whereas the reverse was true for high pKa (weak acid) and low lipid solubility. Ropivacaine, being less lipophilic has the theoretical advantage of a stronger differential in sensory/motor blocks than bupivacaine and lidocaine, especially when low concentrations are used with good preservation of motor function and least CNS and cardiac toxicity.
In view of potential side effects of bupivacaine–epinephrine or lidocaine–epinephrine combination, ropivacaine is a more appropriate choice, for local anaesthesia pain relief in otolaryngology.
Mechanism of Action
Ropivacaine acts by blocking electrical conduction in peripheral nerves. Peripheral nerves are tubular structures that contain millions of axons bundled into fascicles, which in aggregate comprises an individual nerve. Each axon is composed of a phospholipid bilayer cell membrane, which is impermeable to sodium in the resting state. Sodium is therefore the major extracellular cation and potassium [3] is the major intracellular cation, accounting for the electric gradient from inside to outside the cell of − 70 to − 90 mV. The ropivacaine binds to protein receptors in the transport channel, thereby preventing sodium influx, cell membrane depolarization and propagation of electrical nerve conduction.
Pharmacodynamics
Ropivacaine is less lipophilic than bupivacaine, together with its stereoselective properties which contributes to significant higher threshold for cardiotoxicity and CNS toxicity than bupivacaine in animals and healthy volunteers [4–6].
Ropivacaine has been shown to inhibit platelet aggregation in plasma at concentrations of 3.75 and 1.88 mg/mL (0.375% and 0.188%) [7]. Like other anaesthetics, ropivacaine has antibacterial activity in vitro, inhibiting the growth of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [8, 9].
Pharmacokinetics
Ropivacaine is bound to plasma proteins to an extent of 94%, mainly to α1-acid glycoprotein [10]. Ropivacaine is metabolised extensively in the liver and kidney is the main excretory organ for ropivacaine, accounting for 86% [11–13].
Duration of action
Ropivacaine significantly prolongs the duration of nerve block and local infiltration. Ropivacaine is a long acting amide anaesthetic. Duration of action lasts for 5 to 8 h. The duration of action of a local anaesthetic is a function of the degree of protein binding of the drug. The higher the degree of protein binding [11], the greater the affinity of the drug for the protein receptor in the transport channel and the longer the drug remains bound to the receptor.
Clinically, the duration of the infiltration or block can be extended by adding epinephrine in concentration 1:40,000 to the local anaesthetic solution to cause vasoconstriction of capacitance vessels and venules to delay drug washout.
The maximum safe dosage of local anaesthetics when injected is generally increased when used in combination with a vasoconstriction agent. Serum concentration increases at a slower rate when blood flow is diminished at the site of treatment as the anaesthetic is sequestered. This same process will increase the duration of analgesic effect when administered along with a vasoconstrictor [14]. Addition of buprenorphine 3 µg/kg, tramadol 1–1.5 mg/kg, clonidine (1–2 µg/kg) or dexamethasone (4–10 mg) to ropivacaine prolonged the duration of action and hence pain relief (Table 1).
Table 1.
Dosage: Maximum recommended doses [14] in comparison with other commonly used drugs Lidocaine and Bupivacaine
Anaesthetic route of administration | Maximum single dose without vasoconstrictor (mg/kg) | Maximum single dose with vasoconstrictor (mg/kg) | Onset of action (min) | Duration of action in isolation (min) [with vasoconstrictor, if available] |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lidocaine infiltration | 3 mg/kg per dose, not to exceed 300 mg per dose, | 7 mg/kg per dose—not to exceed 500 mg per dose | 1–3 min | 1/2–2 h [2 to 4 h with epinephrine] |
Bupivacaine infiltration | 2.5 mg/kg per dose—not to exceed 175 mg per dose | 3 mg/kg per dose—not to exceed 225 mg per dose | 2–7 min | 2–3 h [3–7 h with epinephrine] |
Ropivacaine infiltration | 3 mg/kg per dose—not to exceed 225 mg per dose | 4 mg/kg per dose—not to exceed 225 mg per dose | 3–7 min | 3–4 h [5–8 h with epinephrine] |
The time of onset of the ropivacaine can be shortened by increasing the concentration of the drug. The higher the concentration, more molecules shall be available for diffusion, protein receptor binding and hence faster the onset of drug action.
Adverse Effects and Toxicity
Ropivacaine is an amide-linked local anaesthetic. Allergic reactions to amide-linked local anaesthetics are rare. Cardiotoxicity include myocardial depression and cardiac arrhythmias. Central nervous system toxicity includes confusion, hyperactivity, dizziness, tinnitus, seizures, coma, and respiratory arrest. Cardiovascular and CNS toxicity is least to ropivacaine among all available local anesthetics [10, 15, 16].
Ropivacaine is available in strengths of 0.2%, 0.5%, 0.75% and 1% as 30 ml vials or ampules.
Our Experience with Ropivacaine
For Nose and Sinuses
Most of the nasal and sinus surgeries in our ENT practice are performed under local anaesthesia as day-care procedures. A solution of 0.5% ropivacaine with epinephrine in the ratio 1:40,000 (20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine with 0.5 ml of epinephrine 1:1000) is used for sinus blocks and infiltration of septum. We also use it for rhinoplasty cases for local nerve block and postoperative pain relief [17, 18].
For External and Middle Ear
We use a solution of 0.5% ropivacaine with epinephrine in the ratio 1:40,000 (20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine with 0.5 ml of epinephrine 1:1000) for all external and middle ear surgeries, performed under local anaesthesia.
We get excellent surgical field, good patient cooperation during surgery and long duration postoperative pain relief [19, 20].
For Adenotonsillectomy
When adenotonsillectomy was performed under general anaesthesia, we inject 0.5% ropivacaine into both pillars of tonsillar fossa and nasopharynx in the adenoids bed [21].
When combined with epinephrine, the patient gets transient tachycardia and elevated blood pressure at the time of infiltration but this subsides within few minutes. So in cardiac patients we reduce the concentration of epinephrine.
The postoperative analgesia lasted for 5 to 8 h (till the patient gets discharged, being done as day care procedure) in all patients. Patients treated with ropivacaine and clonidine [22] fared far better in terms of pain relief up to postoperative day 3 in tonsillectomy and uvulopalatal surgeries [23] for snoring/Obstructive sleep apnea.
Ropivacaine has been used in our otorhinolaryngology procedures since 2010 (10 years). We haven’t come across any complication due to over dosage or toxicity. We use 0.5% solution in all otorhinolaryngology procedures, around 20 ml per case even though the maximum toxic dose as mentioned in literature is 30–40 ml for a patient of 50 kg weight [24].
Conclusion
In conclusion, ropivacaine appears to be safest of all injectable local anaesthetics and is clearly effective for the management of preoperative and postoperative pain relief for longest duration. Ropivacaine is superior to the lidocaine and bupivacaine in ENT practice when compared in the duration of action and safety. It can be used as a routine drug for all otorhinolaryngology surgeries.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all patients who had undergone surgical procedure with the use of local anesthetic ropivacaine, this encouraged us to share and submit the manuscript for publication in a scientific research journal.
Author Contributions
AN: Chief Operating surgeon, Substantial contributions to the conception of the work; acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data for the work. A continuous source of inspiration, encouragement, motivation for submission for publication. RDK: Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content. HAN: Review of literature, Drafting the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content. OS: Review of literature and Manuscript. KRV: Review of the Literature and Manuscript. VM: Review of Literature
Funding
None.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from individual participant included in the study.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Nagalingeswaran Ahilasamy, Email: nahilasamy@yahoo.com.
Rajendran Dinesh Kumar, Email: dinuraj1186@gmail.com.
Hem Anand Nayagam, Email: dr.hemanand@gmail.com.
Omprakash Shanmuganandam, Email: ompy66@gmail.com.
K. R. Vaibhavi, Email: vybookr@gmail.com
Vishakha Modak, Email: vishakha.m8@gmail.com.
References
- 1.Hansen TG. Ropivacaine: a pharmacological review. Expert Rev Neurother. 2004;4(5):781–791. doi: 10.1586/14737175.4.5.781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.McClellan KJ, Faulds D. Ropivacaine. Drugs. 2000;60:1065–1093. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200060050-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kindler CH, Paul M, Zou H, et al. Amide local anesthetics potently inhibit the human tandem pore domain background K+ channel TASK-2 (KCNK5) J PharmacolExpTher. 2003;306(1):84–92. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.049809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Graf BM, Abraham I, Eberbach N, Kunst G, Stowe DF, Martin E. Differences in cardiotoxicity of bupivacaine and ropivacaine are the result of physicochemical and stereoselective properties. Anesthesiology. 2002;96(6):1427–1434. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200206000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dony P, Dewinde V, Vanderick B, et al. The comparative toxicity of ropivacaine and bupivacaine at equipotent doses in rats. AnesthAnalg. 2000;91(6):1489–1492. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200012000-00036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Knudsen K, Beckman Suurküla M, Blomberg S, Sjövall J, Edvardsson N. Central nervous and cardiovascular effects of i.v. infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78(5):507–514. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Porter J, Crowe B, Cahill M, Shorten G. The effects of ropivacaine hydrochloride on platelet function: an assessment using the platelet function analyser (PFA-100) Anaesthesia. 2001;56(1):15–18. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01760.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bátai I, Kerényi M, Falvai J, Szabó G. Bacterial growth in ropivacaine hydrochloride. AnesthAnalg. 2002;94(3):729–731. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200203000-00046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kampe S, Poetter C, Buzello S, Wenchel HM, Paul M, Kiencke P, et al. Ropivacaine 01% with sufentanil 1 microg/mL inhibits in vitro growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and does not promote multiplication of Staphylococcus aureus. AnesthAnalg. 2003;97:409–411. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000067404.84486.7A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Simpson D, Curran MP, Oldfield V, Keating GM. Ropivacaine: a review of its use in regional anaesthesia and acute pain management. Drugs. 2005;65(18):2675–2717. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565180-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Burm AG, Stienstra R, Brouwer RP, Emanuelsson BM, van Kleef JW. Epidural infusion of ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia after major orthopedic surgery: pharmacokinetic evaluation. Anesthesiology. 2000;93(2):395–403. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200008000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ekström G, Gunnarsson UB. Ropivacaine, a new amide-type local anesthetic agent, is metabolized by cytochromes P4501A and 3A in human liver microsomes. Drug MetabDispos. 1996;24(9):955–961. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee A, Fagan D, Lamont M, Tucker GT, Halldin M, Scott DB. Disposition kinetics of ropivacaine in humans. AnesthAnalg. 1989;69(6):736–738. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Berde CB, Strichartz GR. Local anesthetics. In: Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, Wiener-Kronish JP, Young WL, editors. Miller’s anesthesia. 7. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill-Livingstone; 2010. pp. 917–918. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Scott DB, Lee A, Fagan D, Bowler GM, Bloomfield P, Lundh R. Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine. AnesthAnalg. 1989;69(5):563–569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gunter JB. Benefit and risks of local anesthetics in infants and children. Paediatr Drugs. 2002;4(10):649–672. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200204100-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Karaman E, Gungor G, Alimoglu Y, et al. The effect of lidocaine, bupivacaine and ropivacaine in nasal packs on pain and hemorrhage after septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;268(5):685–689. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1432-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gencer ZK, Ozkiriş M, Gencer M, Saydam L. Comparison of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, prilocaine, and lidocaine in the management of pain and hemorrhage during nasal pack removal. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013;27(5):423–425. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shaffer AD, Jabbour N, Visoiu M, Yang CI, Yellon RF. Paravertebral nerve block for donor site pain in stage I microtia reconstruction: a pilot study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;154(5):898–901. doi: 10.1177/0194599816629395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Byram SC, Bialek SE, Husak VA, et al. Distinct neurotoxic effects of select local anesthetics on facial nerve injury and recovery. RestorNeurolNeurosci. 2020;38(2):173–183. doi: 10.3233/RNN-190987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ozkiriş M, Kapusuz Z, Saydam L. Comparison of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and lidocaine in the management of post-tonsillectomy pain. Int J PediatrOtorhinolaryngol. 2012;76(12):1831–1834. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Giannoni C, White S, Enneking FK, Morey T. Ropivacaine with or without clonidine improves pediatric tonsillectomy pain. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(10):1265–1270. doi: 10.1001/archotol.127.10.1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ponstein NA, Kim TW, Hsia J, Goode R, Borges P, Mariano ER. Continuous lesser palatine nerve block for postoperative analgesia after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Clin J Pain. 2013;29(12):e35–e38. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182971887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Catterall WA, Mackie K. Local anesthetics. In: Brunton LL, Hilal-Dandan R, Knollman BC, editors. Goodman and Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 13. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2018. pp. 405–420. [Google Scholar]