Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2021 May 27;9:e11540. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11540

Bracon wasps for ecological pest control–a laboratory experiment

Jessica Lettmann 1, Karsten Mody 1,2, Tore-Aliocha Kursch-Metz 3, Nico Blüthgen 1, Katja Wehner 1,
Editor: Joseph Gillespie
PMCID: PMC8164837  PMID: 34123600

Abstract

Biological control of pest insects by natural enemies may be an effective, cheap and environmentally friendly alternative to synthetic pesticides. The cosmopolitan parasitoid wasp species Bracon brevicornis Wesmael and B. hebetor Say (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) use lepidopteran species as hosts, including insect pests like Ephestia kuehniella or Ostrinia nubilalis. Here, we compare the reproductive success of both Bracon species on E. kuehniella in a laboratory experiment. We asked (1) how the reproductive success on a single host larva changes with temperature, (2) how it changes with temperature when more host larvae are present and (3) how temperature and availability of host larvae influence the efficacy of Bracon species as biological control agents. In general, differences between B. brevicornis and B. hebetor have been small. For rearing both Bracon species in the laboratory on one host larva, a temperature between 20–27 °C seems appropriate to obtain the highest number of offspring with a female-biased sex ratio. Rearing the braconid wasps on more than one host larva revealed a higher number of total offspring but less offspring per host larva on average. Again, highest numbers of offspring hatched at 27 °C and the sex ratio was independent from temperature. Although no parasitoids hatched at 12 °C and only few at 36 °C, host larvae were still paralyzed. The efficacy of B. brevicornis was higher than 80% at all numbers of host larvae presented at all temperatures while the efficacy of B. hebetor was less than 80% at 12 °C and 27 °C at low numbers of host larvae presented. In conclusion, practitioners can use either B. brevicornis or B. hebetor at low and high temperatures and at varying host densities to achieve high pest control efficacy.

Keywords: Biological pest control, Braconidae, Host number, Oviposition behavior, Sex ratio, Temperature dependence

Introduction

Intensified land-use often causes a loss of biodiversity of above- and below-ground organisms and a homogenization of plant and animal communities by the reduction of habitat diversity or habitat destruction (Andow, 1983; Hendrickx et al., 2007; Weiner et al., 2011; Allan et al., 2015; Newbold et al., 2015; Chisté et al., 2016; Gossner et al., 2016). Such losses of biodiversity affect ecosystem services; e.g., the loss of pollinator species such as wild bees or bumblebees causes a reduction in pollination (Biesmeijer et al., 2006; Potts et al., 2010). Loss of habitats and an alteration of landscapes also impair the service of natural pest control by their natural enemies (Kruess & Tscharntke, 1994; Bianchi, Booij & Tscharntke, 2006; Rusch et al., 2013; Pinero & Manandhar, 2015) resulting in the spread of insect pests (Balzan, Bocci & Moonen, 2016; Hajek & Eilenberg, 2018). A prominent example of a pest insect that is spread over many European countries and also large parts of North America is the European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), which profits from corn monocultures and causes high yield losses (Štĕpánek, Veselá & Muška, 2014). The moths’ larvae burrow into the stem, disrupt the nutrient supply and destabilize the plant (Capinera, 2000; Vétek et al., 2017). Natural enemies like the insidious flower bug Orius insidiosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) or parasitoid wasps are less abundant in monocultures than in diverse landscapes (Lundgren, Wyckhuys & Desneux, 2009; Pak et al., 2015).

Synthetic insecticides are commonly used to prevent damages caused by insect pests in granaries and in agricultural landscapes. Such pesticides are often harmful and toxic to aquatic organisms, pollinators (Hallberg, 1989; Dunier & Siwicki, 1993; Arias-Estévez et al., 2008) as well as to natural antagonists of pests (Ruberson, Nemoto & Hirose, 1998). Alternatively, biological pest control uses biological agents for the control of different pests. These biological control agents need to be easily applicable, and should have low production costs while being effective at the same time. Biological pest control can be achieved by antagonists of insect pests (Kremen & Chaplin-Kramer, 2007) or pathogens like bacteria or viruses (Lacey et al., 2015). The use of parasitoid wasps has been shown to be an efficient method for controlling insect pests in agricultural systems and stored products (e.g., Schöller et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019).

Many organisms already used as biological control agents belong to the family Braconidae (Hymenoptera), including the species Bracon (=Habrobracon) brevicornis Wesmael and Bracon (=Habrobracon) hebetor Say. Due to their promising use in biological pest control, both Bracon species have been investigated for decades (e.g., King, 1987; Galloway & Grant, 1988; Zaki et al., 1998; Akman Gündüz & Gülel, 2005; Saadat et al., 2016). The Bracon species are cosmopolitan, polyphagous, gregarious, larval ectoparasitoids (Antolin, Ode & Strand, 1995). They use different lepidopteran species as hosts including many insect pests like Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), Galleria mellonella (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) or Ectomyelois ceratoniae (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) (Ghimire & Phillips, 2010; Saadat, Bandani & Dastranj, 2014; Farag et al., 2015; Khalil et al., 2016; Singh, Singh & Tripathi, 2016; Amadou et al., 2019). By stinging the host larva the parasitoid wasp injects a venom and paralyzes the host larva, which stops feeding and moving immediately (Abbas, 1980; Wührer & Zimmermann, 2008; Wyss, Wührer & Zimmermann, 2010). Afterwards, eggs are laid on the outside of the host larva, which remains paralyzed. After hatching, the wasp larvae feed on their host and finally kill it (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Life cycle of Bracon brevicornis and B. hebetor.

Figure 1

Life cycle of Bracon brevicornis and B. hebetor. I: female and male wasps, II: female wasp injects venom, III: parasitoid eggs on host (encircled), IV: parasitoid larvae, V: pupated parasitoid larvae.

The Mediterranean flour moth Ephestia kuehniella is a cosmopolitan pest of stored grain products (Jacob & Cox, 1977; Ayvaz & Karabörklü, 2008; Xu, Wang & He, 2008). By spinning webbings that clog the machinery in industrial flourmills, E. kuehniella causes economic damages (Jacob & Cox, 1977; Ayvaz & Karabörklü, 2008). Eggs or larvae of E. kuehniella are commonly used to rear parasitoids such as Trichogramma or Bracon (Faal-Mohammad-Ali & Shishehbor, 2013; Xu, Wang & He, 2008; St-Onge et al., 2015).

Bracon brevicornis and B. hebetor are promising species for biological pest control since females lay eggs on various pest host species, stop their development by paralyzing them and finally reduce pest densities (Taylor, 1988; Akman Gündüz & Gülel, 2005). However, both Bracon species are very similar morphologically (separated by wing venation, larval morphology and genital characters; Matthews, 1974) and also show similar life cycles (Alam et al., 2016; Srinivasan & Mohan, 2017). This parasitic life cycle can be influenced by several factors (e.g., Saadat et al., 2014). There is evidence that Bracon females can regulate clutch size based on the size and/or quality of the host (Taylor, 1988; Godfray, 1994; Milonas, 2005). Furthermore, host density and density of the parasitoid population seem to influence life cycle statistics and sex ratios; i.e., B. hebetor produced more females if densities were high (Galloway & Grant, 1988; Singh, Singh & Tripathi, 2016). Additionally, temperature plays an important role in the developmental biology of Bracon species and also affects the efficacy of parasitization (Rao & Kumar, 1960; Thanavendan & Jeyarani, 2010). As agents for biological control, braconid wasps are often used in addition to trichogrammatid parasitoids which parasitize eggs of insect pests (Brower, 1988) which is also done to dam E. kuehniella (Ayvaz & Karabörklü, 2008; St-Onge et al., 2015). If high pest pressure occurs and many eggs remain unparasitized and develop to larvae, B. brevicornis and B. hebetor can be used in support.

Ideally, the rearing of biological control agents should be inexpensive and simple, with no special requirements or culture conditions. Furthermore, in Bracon wasps a high amount of female offspring is desired since only female wasps paralyze and kill the host larvae. For practitioners, high efficacy, i.e., a high number of paralyzed and killed pest larvae, at low cost is important. To further investigate and compare the best rearing conditions and efficacy of B. brevicornis and B. hebetor, we asked:

  • (1) how reproductive success of female wasps on a single host Ephestia kuehniella larva changes with temperature,

  • (2) how reproduction success of female wasps changes with the availability of more host larvae at different temperatures, and

  • (3) how temperature and varying availability of hosts affect the number and mortality of paralyzed host larvae and therefore the potential efficacy of braconid wasps as biocontrol agents.

Materials and Methods

Rearing of Bracon brevicornis and Bracon hebetor

The laboratory studies were conducted between January and June 2019. The first generation of B. brevicornis and B. hebetor was provided by AMW Nützlinge, Pfungstadt, Germany. Cultivation started with three strains of B. hebetor and two strains of B. brevicornis collected from different hosts (Appendix 1). For rearing, two females of either B. hebetor or B. brevicornis and ten Ephestia kuehniella larvae (last stage before pupation L6) were placed in Petri dishes with 5 cm diameter, using five to ten Petri dishes per strain and generation. Until pupation, Petri dishes were placed in climate chambers at 27 °C, 70% relative humidity (RH) and a light-dark photoperiod of 16:8 (L:D). Subsequently, the cocoons were transferred in glass bottles and left at room temperature until hatching. Female and male wasps were kept together after hatching and fed with sugar water. At the earliest 48 h after hatching but not later than 5 days after hatching, the female wasps were used for the experiments. Unused specimens were frozen after 5 days, and only young females were ever used.

Reproductive success of female wasps on a single host larva at different temperatures

The number of offspring from each individual female wasp of either B. brevicornis or B. hebetor on one larva of E. kuehniella was recorded. Therefore, one female of each Bracon strain and one host larva were set in a Petri dish with 5 cm diameter and placed in climate chambers with 12 °C, 20 °C, 27 °C or 36 °C with steady humidity of 70% and 16:8 L:D photoperiod. Each temperature was replicated per species and strain; the final number of replications varied due to difference in the developmental cycle and the survival rate (see Appendix 2 for initial numbers of replications). Samples were frozen when all wasps had hatched, but no later than 5 weeks after the start of the experiment. Subsequently, the number of hatched female and male wasps was determined.

Reproductive success of female wasps on variable numbers of host larvae at different temperatures

The number of offspring of one female wasp of either B. brevicornis or B. hebetor on varying numbers of E. kuehniella larvae was recorded. Therefore, one female wasp of each Bracon strain and 5, 10, 15, 20 or 25 E. kuehniella larvae, respectively, were kept in Petri dishes or plastic tubes with rectangular shape (5 cm diameter, 2.0 cm × 15.2 cm × 2.0 cm height × width × depth) in the climate chamber regimes as described above. Since female wasps have not been fed during the experiments, they were removed after 4 days. Furthermore, we expected 4 days to be the timeframe of the main oviposition period (Kabore et al., 2019). Larvae were tested for paralysis through a short squeeze of the head capsule with a featherweight forceps, showing no movement when paralyzed. Numbers of paralyzed and still active larvae were documented. Subsequently, paralyzed larvae were kept in climate chambers until all parasitoid larvae hatched but no longer than 5 weeks after the start of the experiment. Afterwards the samples were frozen and the number of hatched female and male wasps was documented. As a control, the same number of host larvae was incubated over the same period without female wasps, and moth development was documented. To determine the efficacy of pest control by the braconid wasps, paralyzation rates were calculated as paralyzation rate = number of paralyzed host larvae/number of presented host larvae.

Data analysis

Data were analysed with RStudio Version 1.1.383. First, the impact of strain affiliation was tested using linear model ANOVA. Since no differences between strains were observed (temperature*strain: F3,617 = 0.688 p = 0.560, strain: F3,617 = 1.146 p = 0.330), all strains were pooled for further analyses. Before statistical analyses, normal distribution of residuals was tested by Shapiro test and variance homogeneity by Levene’s test

The response of total offspring of either B. brevicornis or B. hebetor hatched from one host larva from one female to changing temperatures was tested using general linear model (GLM) with poisson distribution and Chi-test. Tukey pairwise comparison was used subsequently. Similarly, sex ratio of offspring in response to different temperatures and Bracon species was tested using GLM with Poisson distribution (see Appendix 3 for raw data).

For testing the response of total offspring or sex ratio when different numbers of host larvae were presented, temperature, species and number of host larvae were included as variables in a GLM analysis with Poisson distribution and Chi-test. The number of hatched parasitoids (total, male, female) was square root transformed before statistical analysis. For pairwise comparisons, Tukey post hoc test was used (see Appendix 4 for raw data).

Differences in the efficacy of the braconid wasps between temperature and number of host larvae was tested using Kruskal–Wallis tests because of lacking normal distribution.

Results

How does the reproductive success of female wasps of B. brevicornis and B. hebetor on a single host larva change with temperature?

The reproductive success of Bracon females differed with temperature and species (temperature × species: χ2(3,399) = 21.90, p = 0.046; species: χ2(3,399) = 21.90, p < 0.001). In B. brevicornis, mean numbers of offspring decreased from ~8 at 20 °C and 27 °C to ~4 at 36 °C although the decrease was not significant (temperature: χ2(1,185) = 0.131, p = 0.958). In B. hebetor, mean number of offspring significantly decreased from ~9 at 20 °C and 27 °C to ~5 at 36 °C (temperature: χ2(1,214) = 7.88, p = 0.005). Both species failed to produce offspring at 12 °C and had the highest offspring at 20 °C and 27 °C (Fig. 2, Table 1).

Figure 2. Total number of offspring emerging from one host larva.

Figure 2

Total number of offspring emerging per host larva when Bracon brevicornis (white) or Bracon hebetor (dark grey) are each given one single host larva to parasitize at constant different temperatures (12 °C, 20 °C, 27 °C, 36 °C). Notches symbolize the 95% confidence. n = number of replicates.

Table 1. Comparion of hatched total offspring from parasitization on one host larva at oviposition at different temperatures.

P-values of Tukey pairwise comparion of hatched total offspring from parasitization on one host larva at oviposition at different temperatures (12 °C, 20 °C, 27 °C, 36 °C) in Bracon hebetor and Bracon brevicornis. Significance value: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Comparsion Bracon brevicornis Brevicornis hebetor
12 °C/20 °C <0.001 *** <0.001 ***
12 °C/27 °C <0.001 *** <0.001 ***
12 °C/36 °C 0.033 * 0.044 *
20 °C/27 °C ns ns
20 °C/36 °C 0.002 ** 0.020 *
27 °C/36 °C 0.001 ** 0.020 *

In both species, the sex ratio was not temperature dependent (species × sex: χ2(11,299) = 272.57, p = 0.105; temperature × sex: χ2(11,299) = 272.57, p = 0.907). Although not significant, in B. brevicornis, the sex ratio was balanced at 20 °C (♂/♀ 1.02), became female biased at 27 °C (0.86), but was male biased at 36 °C (1.80). In B. hebetor, a male biased sex ratio was found at 20 °C and 36 °C (1.84 and 11, respectively), but it was about balanced at 27 °C (1.07).

How does the reproductive success of female wasps of B. brevicornis and B. hebetor change with the number of available host larvae at different temperatures?

Presenting different numbers of host larvae at different temperatures to females of B. brevicornis and B. hebetor revealed a similar pattern of offspring for both species (host larvae × species × temperature: χ2(7,627) = 1073.78, p = 0.512; Fig. 3, Table 2). In general, the number of offspring in Bracon species differed with the number of presented host larvae and temperature (host larvae respectively temperature: χ2(7,627) = 1073.78, p < 0.001). At 12 °C, no offspring hatched at any number of presented host larvae, but most host larvae were paralyzed and did not develop to imagoes within 5 weeks. At 27 °C, the highest total offspring was observed in both species (Fig. 3, Appendix 5). At 36 °C, oviposition was observed in 20 of 140 samples, and only few parasitoids hatched; therefore, statistical analysis for hatched offspring within this treatment seemed inappropriate.

Figure 3. Total number of offspring emerging from different numbers of host larvae at different temperatures.

Figure 3

Total number of offspring emerging per host larva when (A) Bracon brevicornis and (B) Bracon hebetor are each given 5, 10, 15, 20 or 25 host larvae to parasitize at different constant temperatures (12 °C, 20 °C, 27 °C, 36 °C) for 4 days. Notches symbolize the 95% confidence interval indicating significant differences among groups when no overlap occurs.

Table 2. Influence of different numbers of presented host larvae at different temperatures on the total offspring of Bracon brevicornis and Bracon hebetor.

Statistical results for general linear model analysis testing the influence of different numbers of presented host larvae at different temperatures on the total offspring of Bracon brevicornis and Bracon hebetor. Abbreviations: no., number; df, degree of freedom; resid, residuals; dev, deviance. Significances in bold: *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.

df deviance resid df resid dev F p
No. of host larvae 4 347.8 625 16,569 13.947 <0.001 ***
Species 1 32.2 624 16,536 1.292 0.256
Temperature 3 446.6 623 16,093 17.905 <0.001 ***
No. host larvae*species 4 58.6 622 16,031 2.349 0.126
No. host larvae*temperature 12 62.2 621 15,969 2.494 0.115
Species*temperature 3 115.6 620 15,853 4.636 0.032 *
No. host larvae*species*temperature 12 10.7 619 15,843 0.430 0.512
626 18,916

In B. brevicornis, the number of total offspring at 20 °C did not change with the number of presented larvae (F1,98 = 0.05, p = 0.826; Fig. 3A, Appendix 5). Mean values varied between 11.3 ± 6.6 at 15 host larvae and 19.4 ± 11.5 at 10 host larvae. At 27 °C, the number of total offspring varied significantly with the number of presented host larvae, changing from 27.9 ± 10.7 at 5 host larvae to 45.7 ± 19.3 on average at all higher numbers of host larvae (F1,88 = 21.46, p < 0.001; Fig. 3A, Appendix 5).

In B. hebetor, numbers of total offspring did not change significantly with numbers of host larvae at any temperature (host larvae: χ2(3,321) = 126.94, p = 0.177; temperature: χ2(3,321) = 126.94, p = 0.138) although mean numbers varied between 12.7 ± 5.9 at 10 host larvae and 20.8 ± 19.9 at 20 host larvae (Fig. 3B, Appendix 5).

Sex ratio of offspring varied marginally with numbers of host larvae between Bracon species (host larvae × species: F1,247 = 3.78, p = 0.053), but was independent of temperature (F1,251 = 1.04, p = 0.308; Fig. 4, Appendix 5). In general, fluctuations of sex ratios of Bracon offspring were smaller at 27 °C compared to 20 °C and smaller in B. hebetor as compared to B. brevicornis (Fig. 4). While offspring was generally male biased, females dominated in B. brevicornis at 10 presented host larvae at 27 °C and in B. hebetor at 25 presented host larvae at 20 °C. A sex ratio of approximately 1:1 was observed at 15 host larvae at 20 °C in both Bracon species and at 15 host larvae at 27 °C in B. brevicornis (Fig. 4, Appendix 5).

Figure 4. Sex ratio (♂/♀) of offspring.

Figure 4

Sex ratio (♂/♀) of offspring emerging per host larva when Bracon brevicornis (white) and Bracon hebetor (dark grey) are each given 5, 10, 15, 20 or 25 host larvae to parasitize at different numbers of host larvae (5, 10, 15, 20 and 25) at different constant temperatures (12 °C, 20 °C, 27 °C, 36 °C) for 4 days. Red line marks an equal sex ratio.

Considering the offspring output per host larva, the highest number of offspring per larva was observed when only one host larva was present which was independent of the temperature (Table 3). If more than one host larva was present, a higher number of offspring per larva was observed at 27 °C in both Bracon species, being highest–although lower than on one host larva–when 5 or 10 host larvae were present (Table 3).

Table 3. Mean number of offspring per one host larva when emerged from different numbers of host larvae at different temperatures.

Mean number of offspring per one host larva when emerged from different numbers of host larvae (5, 10, 15, 20, 25) at different temperatures (20 °C, 27 °C) in Bracon brevicornis and Bracon hebetor. Standard deviations are given in brackets.

No. of presented host larvae Bracon brevicornis Bracon hebetor
20 °C 27 °C 20 °C 27 °C
1 8.3 ± 4.1 8.2 ± 4.1 9.2 ± 4.8 9.1 ± 3.9
5 2.9 ± 1.5 5.6 ± 2.1 2.9 ± 2.0 6.2 ± 1.9
10 1.7 ± 1.1 4.1 ± 1.8 1.6 ± 1.1 4.9 ± 1.9
15 0.8 ± 0.7 2.8 ± 1.3 1.0 ± 0.5 2.8 ± 1.5
20 0.8 ± 0.4 2.0 ± 1.1 0.8 ± 0.4 2.5 ± 0.9
25 0.6 ± 0.4 2.4 ± 0.8 0.8 ± 0.5 1.8 ± 0.7

Do different temperatures and varying numbers of host larvae affect the efficacy of braconid wasps?

Paralyzation rates differed significantly with temperature and species (temperature × species: F2,641 = 7.14, p < 0.001; Fig. 5, Table 4). In B. brevicornis, rates were continuously higher than 0.8 for all numbers of host larvae and temperatures. In B. hebetor, rates varied strongly between 0.5 at 12 °C with 10 or 15 host larvae and 1or almost 1 (0.99) at 36 °C for all numbers of host larvae (Fig. 5, Table 4).

Figure 5. Parasitization of host larvae.

Figure 5

Parasitization of host larvae when (A) Bracon brevicornis and (B) Bracon hebetor are each given 5, 10, 15, 20 or 25 host larvae to parasitize at different constant temperatures (12 °C, 20 °C, 27 °C, 36 °C) for 4 days.

Table 4. Parasitization rates at different temperatures with varying numbers of host larvae.

Parasitization rates at different temperatures (12 °C, 20 °C, 27 °C, 36 °C) with varying numbers of host larvae (5, 10, 15, 20, 25). Standard deviations are given in brackets.

Bracon brevicornis Bracon hebetor
12 °C 20 °C 27 °C 36 °C 12 °C 20 °C 27 °C 36 °C
5 0.93 ± 0.14 0.91 ± 0.24 1 ± 0 1 ± 0 0.63 ± 0.46 0.99 ± 0.05 0.63 ± 0.44 1 ± 0
10 0.89 ± 0.18 0.99 ± 0.03 1 ± 0 0.98 ± 0.04 0.52 ± 0.44 0.95 ± 0.14 0.66 ± 0.32 1 ± 0
15 0.86 ± 0.18 0.99 ± 0.02 1 ± 0 0.98 ± 0.04 0.57 ± 0.47 0.90 ± 0.20 0.87 ± 0.17 1 ± 0.02
20 0.84 ± 0.22 0.82 ± 0.27 0.99 ± 0.03 0.99 ± 0.04 0.93 ± 0.09 0.98 ± 0.03 0.95 ± 0.07 0.99 ± 0.02
25 0.93 ± 0.08 0.84 ± 0.23 0.95 ± 0.10 0.99 ± 0.02 0.98 ± 0.03 0.83 ± 0.35 0.91 ± 0.09 0.99 ± 0.02

Discussion

How does the reproductive success of female wasps of B. brevicornis and B. hebetor on a single host larva change with temperature?

While presenting one host larva to one female wasp in our study, B. hebetor produced slightly higher numbers of offspring compared to B. brevicornis and oviposition was reduced by increasing temperature. Yu et al. (2003) reported an average of 12.8 eggs oviposited by one B. hebetor female on one host larva (Plodia interpunctella, 28 ± 0.5 °C, 70–75% relative humidity, 16:8 L:D photoperiod). Since the average numbers of eggs per one host larvae in our study were lower (~9 at 20 °C and 27 °C), the choice of the host species seems to have an impact on the reproductive outcome. Previous studies reported that the best host species for rearing Bracon wasps in the laboratory is the greater wax moth Galleria mellonella (Farag et al., 2015; Khalil et al., 2016) which can produce about 260 total offspring within about 38 days (Nikam & Pawar, 1993).

However, highest number of females, which are needed to control host pest species, were produced at 27 °C, with a sex ratio of nearly 1:1 in B. hebetor and even 0.86 in B. brevicornis while nearly all other temperatures showed male-biased sex ratios. Since only female wasps contribute to the effective success of biological pest control, the sex ratio of a laboratory strain of Bracon wasps is of critical importance. Mohamad, Mansour & Ramadan (2015) reported a correlation between sex ratio and temperature whereby high temperatures (35 °C) resulted in higher male-biased offspring. In summary, for rearing B. brevicornis and B. hebetor in the laboratory on one host larva of E. kuehniella (but carefully consider host choice), a temperature between 20–27 °C seems most appropriate.

How does the reproductive success of female wasps of B. brevicornis and B. hebetor change with the number of available host larvae at different temperatures?

The production of offspring and the pattern of sex ratios in response to different numbers of host larvae and temperature was very similar between B. brevicornis and B. hebetor. Presenting more than one host larva to one female wasp resulted in higher numbers of total offspring while the average number per larva was lower as when a single larva was present. Since host quality affects different performance parameters of parasitoids (Bernal, Luck & Morse, 1998; Mody et al., 2017), reducing the number of eggs per host larva could result in increased fitness per parasitoid larva due to reduced competition for food. Furthermore, the processing time one female wasp needs to detect and paralyze a host and to oviposit eggs increases with the number of hosts presented, resulting in less eggs in average (Yu et al., 2003).

As seen for only one host larva, highest numbers of offspring were observed at 27 °C in both species when more larvae were present. Higher temperatures (36 °C) seem to negatively affect the development, probably by heat stress. Direct effects of heat stress were reported by Klockmann, Kleinschmidt & Fischer (2017), showing that heat stress reduced survival rates and fitness of a Lepidoptera larva (Bicyclus anynana). Furthermore, there are indirect effects of heat stress for parasitoids (Singh, Singh & Tripathi, 2014). Bracon wasps belong to the holometabolous insects that undergo a metamorphosis from egg over larva and pupa to adult. For the metamorphosis and the pupation of the larvae the so-called ’critical weight’ must be achieved. When the critical weight is attained, the larvae begin to pupate and start the metamorphosis (Harrison, Woods & Roberts, 2012). At 36 °C, the loss of water of host larvae may cause a reduction of the food quality for the parasitoid larvae. If parasitoid larvae starve, the critical weight is not reached; therefore, the larvae cannot develop into an adult but die. On the other hand, no oviposition and nearly no activity of the female wasps was observed at 12 °C, indicating that they entered chill-coma, a reversible state that is caused by a reduction of physiological processes (MacMillan & Sinclair, 2011; Singh, Singh & Tripathi, 2014).

Besides temperature, braconid wasps showed adjustments in their oviposition behavior according to differences in host density in previous studies (e.g., Godfray, 1994; Yu et al., 2003; Milonas, 2005; Mohamad, Mansour & Ramadan, 2015). In B. brevicornis, numbers of offspring increased with increasing numbers of presented host larvae at 27 °C. In B. hebetor on Corcyra cephalonica, searching efficiency of female parasitoids was best when five host larvae were presented (Singh, Singh & Tripathi, 2016).

In this study, this pattern could be confirmed when Bracon species were reared on one host larva only, but when more host larvae were present the sex ratio of offspring was independent from temperature. On the other hand, sex ratio of offspring slightly changed with varying numbers of host larvae. While Yu et al. (2003) found a sex ratio of approximately 0.5 irrespective of the number of presented host larvae, other studies reported labile sex ratios of B. hebetor in response to density, but with different results: if parasitoid densities were high more females were produced (Galloway & Grant, 1988), but on Galleria mellonella the proportion of females decreased with increasing parasitoid density (Alam et al., 2016).

Do different temperatures and varying numbers of host larvae affect the efficacy of braconid wasps?

Practitioners like farmers care about the efficacy of pest control and not about the number of offspring of the control agent. Nevertheless, they benefit from an economical breeding process, as this allows lower prices per agent application. To replace or at least supplement pesticides, biological control agents should be nearly as effective as pesticides but provide additional advantages.

The current study showed high effectiveness of Bracon species at all temperatures (12–36 °C) and host numbers (five-25) with high paralyzation rates under laboratory conditions. However, concerning the efficacy both Bracon species showed the greatest differences. While B. brevicornis was effective at all temperatures, B. hebetor was less effective at low temperatures. However, although no offspring was observed at 12 °C, female wasps must have injected venom. Since female wasps were kept at room temperature before they were confronted with the host larvae and exposed to 12 °C, they could have paralyzed the host larvae before turning to the chill coma. The paralysis and efficacy at low temperatures represent particular advantages for practitioners. When pest-infested grain- or other stored-products are chilled and not frozen during storage, pests turn over to chill coma, but can develop when conditions become favorable again (Evans, 1987; Locatelli, Papale & Daolio, 1990; Andreadis, Eliopoulos & Savopoulou-Soultani, 2012). Preventive usage of B. brevicornis or B. hebetor could protect grain- or other stored-products before and during chilling against pests like Ephestia kuehniella or Plodia interpunctella.

Furthermore, parasitization over a broad range of temperatures and host densities makes both Bracon species more effective for their use in open fields, where environmental conditions like temperature can vary. In Germany, there are guidelines (‘good agricultural practices’) regulating the use of pesticides in connection with environmental conditions. Pesticide use should hence be avoided when temperatures permanently exceed 25 °C, which becomes more common in summer, or air humidity is below 30%, otherwise penalties will have to be paid. B. brevicornis or B. hebetor could be used effectively in either case.

To summarize the useful facts of this study for breeders: using ten host larvae and one female wasp at 27 °C is recommended to increase the number of offspring in total and to keep the number of hatched parasitoids per host at a high level. Practitioners can use either B. brevicornis or B. hebetor at low and high temperatures as well as with varying host densities to achieve a high level of effectiveness of pest control.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. Strains of B. brevicornis and B. hebetor.

Characterization of Bracon brevicornis and Bracon hebetor strains used for laboratory experiments.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11540/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Initial number of replications.

Number of initial replications for evaluation reproductive success of females wasps on a) a single host and b) different numbers of host larvae at different temperatures.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11540/supp-2
Supplemental Information 3. Raw data for experiments of Bracon species on one host larva.

Abbreviations: m = male, f = female, tot=total.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11540/supp-3
Supplemental Information 4. Raw data for experiments of Bracon species on different numbers of host larvae.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11540/supp-4
Supplemental Information 5. Mean numbers of total offspring, males and females from parasitization on different numbers of host larvae at different temperatures.

Mean numbers of total offspring, males and females from parasitization on different numbers of host larvae (5, 10, 15, 20, 25) at different temperatures (12 °C, 20 °C, 27 °C, 36 °C) in Bracon brevicornis and Bracon hebetor. Standard deviations are given in brackets.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11540/supp-5

Acknowledgments

The authors thank AMW Nützlinge from Pfungstadt for providing the first generation of the parasitoids and providing hosts regularly. We further thank Nadja Simons for supporting the statistical analyses.

Funding Statement

We received support from the Open Access Publishing Fund of Technical University of Darmstadt.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

Tore-Aliocha Kursch-Metz is employed by AMW Nützlinge GmbH.

Author Contributions

Jessica Lettmann conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Karsten Mody conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Tore-Aliocha Kursch-Metz conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Nico Blüthgen conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Katja Wehner conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements are available in the Supplemental Files.

References

  • Abbas (1980).Abbas MST. Bracon brevicornis Wesm., a larval parasite of the pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella Saunders. Agricultural Research Review. 1980;58:233–238. [Google Scholar]
  • Akman Gündüz & Gülel (2005).Akman Gündüz E, Gülel A. Investigation of fecundity and sex ratio in the parasitoid Bracon hebetor Say (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in relation to parasitoid age. Turkish Journal of Zoology. 2005;29:291–294. [Google Scholar]
  • Alam et al. (2016).Alam S, Alam Z, Alam SN, Miah RU, Hossain Mian IC, Hossain MM. Mass rearing of Bracon hebetor (Hym.: Braconidae) on wax moth, Galleria mellonella (Lep.: Pyralidae) with varying density of parasitoid and the host. Journal of Crop Protection. 2016;5(1):39–48. doi: 10.18869/modares.jcp.5.1.39. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Allan et al. (2015).Allan E, Manning P, Alt F, Binkenstein J, Blaser S, Blüthgen N, Böhm S, Grassein F, Hölzel N, Klaus VH, Kleinebecker T, Morris EK, Oelmann Y, Prati D, Renner SC, Rillig MC, Schaefer M, Schloter M, Schmitt B, Schöning I, Schrumpf M, Solly E, Sorkau E, Steckel J, Steffen‐Dewenter I, Stempfhuber B, Tschapka M, Weiner CN, Weisser WW, Werner M, Westphal C, Wilcke W, Fischer M, Knops J. Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition. Ecology Letters. 2015;18(8):834–843. doi: 10.1111/ele.12469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Amadou et al. (2019).Amadou L, Baoua I, Ba MN, Muniappan R. Development of an optimum diet for mass rearing of the Rice Moth, Corcyra cephalonica (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), and production of the parasitoid, Habrobracon hebetor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), for the control of Pearl Millet Head Miner. Journal of Insect Science. 2019;19(2):1–5. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iez020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Andow (1983).Andow D. The extent of monoculture and its effects on insect pest populations with particular reference to wheat and cotton. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 1983;9(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0167-8809(83)90003-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Andreadis, Eliopoulos & Savopoulou-Soultani (2012).Andreadis SS, Eliopoulos PA, Savopoulou-Soultani M. Cold hardiness of immature and adult stages of the Mediterranean flour moth, Ephestia kuehniella. Journal of Stored Products Research. 2012;48(83):132–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jspr.2011.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Antolin, Ode & Strand (1995).Antolin MF, Ode PJ, Strand MR. Variable sex ratios and ovicide in an outbreeding parasitic wasp. Animal Behaviour. 1995;49(3):589–600. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80192-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Arias-Estévez et al. (2008).Arias-Estévez M, López-Periago E, Martínez-Carballo E, Simal-Gándara J, Mejuto J, García-Rio L. The mobility and degradation of pesticides in soils and the pollution of groundwater resources. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2008;123(4):247–260. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2007.07.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Ayvaz & Karabörklü (2008).Ayvaz A, Karabörklü S. Effect of cold storage and different diets on Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lep: Pyralidae) Journal of Pest Sciences. 2008;81(1):57–62. doi: 10.1007/s10340-008-0192-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Balzan, Bocci & Moonen (2016).Balzan MV, Bocci G, Moonen A-C. Utilisation of plant functional diversity in wildflower strips for the delivery of multiple agroecosystem services. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 2016;158(3):304–319. doi: 10.1111/eea.12403. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Bernal, Luck & Morse (1998).Bernal JS, Luck RF, Morse JG. Sex ratios in field populations of two parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of Coccus hesperidum L. (Homoptera: Coccidae) Oecologia. 1998;116(4):510–518. doi: 10.1007/s004420050616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bianchi, Booij & Tscharntke (2006).Bianchi FJJA, Booij CJH, Tscharntke T. Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2006;273(1595):1715–1727. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Biesmeijer et al. (2006).Biesmeijer JC, Roberts SPM, Reemer M, Ohlemüller R, Edwards M, Peeters T, Chaffers AP, Potts SG, Kleikers R, Thomas CD, Settele J, Kunin WE. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science. 2006;313(5785):351–354. doi: 10.1126/science.1127863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brower (1988).Brower JH. Population suppression of the almond moth and the Indian meal moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) by release of Trichogramma pretiosum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) into simulated peanut storages. Journal of Economic Entomology. 1988;81(3):944–948. doi: 10.1093/jee/81.3.944. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Capinera (2000).Capinera JL. European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hubner) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: pyralidae). Citeseer. This document is EENY-156 (IN313), one of a series of Featured Creatures from the Entomology and Nematology Department, UF/IFAS Extension. 2000. http://entomology.ifas.ufl.edu/creatures http://entomology.ifas.ufl.edu/creatures
  • Chisté et al. (2016).Chisté M, Mody K, Gossner MM, Simons NK, Köhler G, Weisser WW, Blüthgen N. Losers, winners, and opportunists: how grassland land-use intensity affects orthopteran communities. Ecosphere. 2016;7(11):e01545 [Google Scholar]
  • Dunier & Siwicki (1993).Dunier M, Siwicki AK. Effects of pesticides and other organic pollutants in the aquatic environment on immunity of fish: a review. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 1993;3(6):423–438. doi: 10.1006/fsim.1993.1042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Evans (1987).Evans DE. The survival of immature grain beetles at low temperatures. Journal of Stored Products Research. 1987;23(2):79–83. doi: 10.1016/0022-474X(87)90020-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Faal-Mohammad-Ali & Shishehbor (2013).Faal-Mohammad-Ali H, Shishehbor P. Biological parameters of Bracon hebetor (Hym.: Braconidae) parasitizing Ephestia kuehniella (Lep.: Pyralidae): effect of host diet. Journal of Crop Protection. 2013;2(4):411–419. [Google Scholar]
  • Farag et al. (2015).Farag NA, Ismail IA, Elbehery HHA, Abdel-Rahman RS, Abdel-Raheem MA. Life table of Bracon hebetor say. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) reared on different hosts. International Journal of ChemTech Research. 2015;8:123–130. [Google Scholar]
  • Galloway & Grant (1988).Galloway KS, Grant B. Reverse sex-ratio adjustment in an apparently outbreeding wasp, Bracon hebetor. Evolution. 1988;43(2):465–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04241.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ghimire & Phillips (2010).Ghimire MN, Phillips TW. Suitability of different lepidopteran host species for development of Bracon hebetor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) Environmental Entomology. 2010;39(2):449–458. doi: 10.1603/EN09213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Godfray (1994).Godfray HCJ. Parasitoids: behavioral and evolutionary ecology. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • Gossner et al. (2016).Gossner MM, Lewinsohn TM, Kahl T, Grassein F, Boch S, Prati D, Birkhofer K, Renner SC, Sikorski J, Wubet T, Arndt H, Baumgartner V, Blaser S, Blüthgen N, Börschig C, Buscot F, Diekötter T, Jorge LRé, Jung K, Keyel AC, Klein A-M, Klemmer S, Krauss J, Lange M, Müller J, Overmann J, Pašalić E, Penone C, Perović DJ, Purschke O, Schall P, Socher SA, Sonnemann I, Tschapka M, Tscharntke T, Türke M, Venter PC, Weiner CN, Werner M, Wolters V, Wurst S, Westphal C, Fischer M, Weisser WW, Allan E. Land-use intensification causes multitrophic homogenization of grassland communities. Nature. 2016;540(7632):266–269. doi: 10.1038/nature20575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hajek & Eilenberg (2018).Hajek AE, Eilenberg J. Natural enemies: an introduction to biological control. Cambrigde: Cambridge University Press; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • Hallberg (1989).Hallberg GR. Pesticides pollution of groundwater in the humid United States. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 1989;26(3–4):299–367. doi: 10.1016/0167-8809(89)90017-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Harrison, Woods & Roberts (2012).Harrison JF, Woods HA, Roberts SP. Ecological and environmental physiology of insects. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. pp. 203–205. [Google Scholar]
  • Hendrickx et al. (2007).Hendrickx F, Maelfait J-P, Van Wingerden W, Schweiger O, Speelmans M, Aviron S, Augenstein I, Billeter R, Bailey D, Bukacek R, Burel F, Diekötter T, Dirksen J, Herzog F, Liira J, Roubalova M, Vandomme V, Bugter R. How landscape structure, land-use intensity and habitat diversity affect components of total arthropod diversity in agricultural landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2007;44(2):340–351. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01270.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Jacob & Cox (1977).Jacob TA, Cox PD. The influence of temperature and humidity on the life-cycle of Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoperta: Pyralidae) Journal of Stored Products Research. 1977;13(3):107–118. doi: 10.1016/0022-474X(77)90009-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Kabore et al. (2019).Kabore A, Ba NM, Dabire-Binso C, Sanon A. Towards development of a parasitoid cottage industry of the parasitoid wasp Habrobracon hebetor (Say): optimum rearing and releases conditions for successful biological control of the millet head miner Heliocheilus albipunctella (De Joannis) in the Sahel. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. 2019;39:25–33. [Google Scholar]
  • Khalil et al. (2016).Khalil MS, Raza ABM, Azal M, Aqueel MA, Khalil H, Hance T. Effects of different host species on the life history of Bracon hebetor. Animal Biology. 2016;66(3–4):403–414. doi: 10.1163/15707563-00002509. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • King (1987).King BH. Offspring sex-ratios in parasitoid wasps. Quarterly Review of Biology. 1987;62(4):367–396. doi: 10.1086/415618. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Klockmann, Kleinschmidt & Fischer (2017).Klockmann M, Kleinschmidt F, Fischer K. Carried over: heat stress in the egg stage reduces subsequent performance in a butterfly. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(7):e0180968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kremen & Chaplin-Kramer (2007).Kremen C, Chaplin-Kramer R. Insects as providers of ecosystem services: crop pollination and pest control. Insect Conservation Biology: Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society’s 23rd Symposium; CABI Publishing; 2007. pp. 349–382. [Google Scholar]
  • Kruess & Tscharntke (1994).Kruess A, Tscharntke T. Habitat fragmentation, species loss, and biological control. Science. 1994;264(5165):1581–1584. doi: 10.1126/science.264.5165.1581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lacey et al. (2015).Lacey LA, Grzywacz D, Shapiro-Ilan DI, Frutos R, Brownbridge M, Goettel MS. Insect pathogens as biological control agents: back to the future. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2015;132(7):1–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2015.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Locatelli, Papale & Daolio (1990).Locatelli DP, Papale G, Daolio E. Evaluation of the resistance to low temperatures of eggs of the pyralids Ephestia kuehniella (Zell.), Ephestia cautella Wlk., Plodia interpunctella (Hbn.) and Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton) Bollettino di Zoologia Agraria e di Bachicoltura. 1990;22:17–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Lundgren, Wyckhuys & Desneux (2009).Lundgren JG, Wyckhuys KAG, Desneux N. Population responses by Orius insidiosus to vegetational diversity. BioControl. 2009;54(1):135–142. doi: 10.1007/s10526-008-9165-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • MacMillan & Sinclair (2011).MacMillan HA, Sinclair BJ. Mechanisms underlying insect chill-coma. Journal of Insect Physiology. 2011;57(1):12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Matthews, 1974.Matthews RW. Biology of Braconidae. Annual Review of Entomology. 1974;19:15–32. [Google Scholar]
  • Milonas (2005).Milonas PG. Influence of initial egg density and host size on the development of the gregarious parasitoid Bracon hebetor on three different host species. BioControl. 2005;50(3):415–428. doi: 10.1007/s10526-004-2837-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Mody et al. (2017).Mody K, Collatz J, Bucharova A, Dorn S. Crop cultivar affects performance of herbivore enemies and may trigger enhanced pest control by coaction of different parasitoid species. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2017;245:74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Mohamad, Mansour & Ramadan (2015).Mohamad F, Mansour M, Ramadan A. Effects of biological and environmental factors on sex ratio in Ascogaster quadridentata Wesmael (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid of Cydia pomonella L. (Torticidae) Journal of Plant Protection Research. 2015;55(2):151–155. doi: 10.1515/jppr-2015-0019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Newbold et al. (2015).Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, Contu S, Lysenko I, Senior RA, Börger L, Bennett DJ, Choimes A, Collen B, Day J, De Palma A, Díaz S, Echeverria-Londoño S, Edgar MJ, Feldman A, Garon M, Harrison MLK, Alhusseini T, Ingram DJ, Itescu Y, Kattge J, Kemp V, Kirkpatrick L, Kleyer M, Correia DLP, Martin CD, Meiri S, Novosolov M, Pan Y, Phillips HRP, Purves DW, Robinson A, Simpson J, Tuck SL, Weiher E, White HJ, Ewers RM, Mace GM, Scharlemann Jörn PW, Purvis A. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature. 2015;520:45. doi: 10.1038/nature14324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nikam & Pawar (1993).Nikam PK, Pawar CV. Life tables and intrinsic rate of natural increase of Bracon hebetor Say (Hym., Braconidae) population on Corcyra cephalonica Staint. (Lep., Pyralidae), a key parasitoid of Helicoverpa armigera Hbn. (Lep., Noctuidae) Journal of Applied Entomology. 1993;115(1–5):210–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1993.tb00381.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Pak et al. (2015).Pak D, Iverson AL, Ennis KK, Gonthier DJ, Vandermeer JH. Parasitoid wasps benefit from shade tree size and landscape complexity in Mexican coffee agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2015;206(3):21–32. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.03.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Pinero & Manandhar (2015).Pinero J, Manandhar R. Effects of increased crop diversity using trap crops, flowering plants, and living mulches on vegetable insect pests. Trends in Entomology. 2015;11:91–109. [Google Scholar]
  • Potts et al. (2010).Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE. Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2010;25(6):345–353. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rao & Kumar (1960).Rao BR, Kumar SS. Effect of temperature and host density on the rate of increase of Bracon brevicornis Wesmael (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) Contributions to Entomology. 1960;10:7–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Ruberson, Nemoto & Hirose (1998).Ruberson J, Nemoto H, Hirose Y. Chapter 11—pesticides and conservation of natural enemies in pest management. In: Barbosa P, editor. Conservation Biological Control. San Diego: Academic Press; 1998. pp. 207–220. [Google Scholar]
  • Rusch et al. (2013).Rusch A, Bommarco M, Smith HG, Ekborn B. Flow and stability of natural pest control services depend on complexity and crop rotation at the landscape scale. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2013;50(2):345–354. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Saadat, Bandani & Dastranj (2014).Saadat D, Bandani AR, Dastranj M. Comparison of the developmental time of Bracon hebetor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) reared on five different lepidopteran host species and its relationship with digestive enzymes. European Journal of Entomology. 2014;111(4):495–500. doi: 10.14411/eje.2014.069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Saadat et al. (2014).Saadat D, Serja AA, Goldansaz SH, Karimzadeh J. Environmental and maternal effects on host selection and parasitism success of Bracon hebetor. BioControl. 2014;59(3):297–306. doi: 10.1007/s10526-014-9572-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Saadat et al. (2016).Saadat D, Serja AA, Goldansaz SH, Williams L. Factors affecting reproductive success and life history parameters of Bracon hebetor Say (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from three host-associated populations. Biological Control. 2016;96(e43607):86–92. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.02.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Schöller et al. (2018).Schöller M, Prozell S, Suma P, Russo A. Biological control of stored-product insects. Recent Advances in Stored Product Protection; Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2018. pp. 183–209. [Google Scholar]
  • Singh, Singh & Tripathi (2014).Singh D, Singh RP, Tripathi CPM. Effect of temperature on life table statistics of Bracon hebetor Say. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies. 2014;7:497–500. [Google Scholar]
  • Singh, Singh & Tripathi (2016).Singh D, Singh RP, Tripathi CPM. Effect of host density on life table statistics of Bracon hebetor Say, 1836 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) Tropical Zoology. 2016;29(1):44–51. doi: 10.1080/03946975.2016.1145399. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Srinivasan & Mohan (2017).Srinivasan T, Mohan C. Population growth potential of Bracon brevicornis Wesmael (Braconidae: Hymenoptera): a life table analysis. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica. 2017;52(1):123–129. doi: 10.1556/038.52.2017.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Štĕpánek, Veselá & Muška (2014).Štĕpánek P, Veselá M, Muška F. The influence of various cultivating technologies of maize on the occurrence of Ostrinia nubilalis, Hübner. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 2014;56:227–234. [Google Scholar]
  • St-Onge et al. (2015).St-Onge M, Cormier D, Todorova S, Lucas E. Conservation of Ephestia kuehniella eggs as hosts for Trichogramma ostriniae. Journal of Applied Entomology. 2015;140(3):218–222. doi: 10.1111/jen.12227. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor (1988).Taylor AD. Host effects on larval competition in the gregarious parasitoid Bracon hebetor. Journal of Animal Ecology. 1988;57(1):163–172. doi: 10.2307/4770. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Thanavendan & Jeyarani (2010).Thanavendan G, Jeyarani S. Effect of different temperature regimes on the biology of Bracon brevicornis Wesmael (Braconidae: Hymenoptera) on different host larvae. Journal of Biopesticides. 2010;3(2):441–444. [Google Scholar]
  • Vétek et al. (2017).Vétek G, Timus A, Chubinishvili M, Avagyan G, Torchan V, Hajdú ZS, Veres A, Nersisyan A. Integrated pest management of major pests and diseases in eastern Europe and the Caucasus. Budapest: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2019).Wang ZZ, Liu YQ, Min SHI, Huang JH, Chen XX. Parasitoid wasps as effective biological control agents. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2019;18(4):705–715. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62078-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Weiner et al. (2011).Weiner CN, Werner M, Linsenmair KE, Blüthgen N. Land use intensity in grasslands: changes in biodiversity, species composition and specialization in flower visitor networks. Basic and Applied Ecology. 2011;12(4):292–299. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2010.08.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Wührer & Zimmermann (2008).Wührer B, Zimmermann O. Die Schlupfwespe Bracon brevicornis, ein natürlicher Gegenspieler des Maiszünslers Ostrinia nubilalis: Erste Erfahrungen mit einem neuen Nützling für die Freilandanwendung. Pflanzenproduktion in Wandel - Wandel im Pflanzenschutz? 56. Deutsche Pflanzenschutztagung in Kiel: 22.- 25. September 2008; 2008. pp. 132–133. [Google Scholar]
  • Wyss, Wührer & Zimmermann (2010).Wyss U, Wührer B, Zimmermann O. Behaviour and development of the parasitoid Bracon brevicornis-an enemy of the European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis. Report on the 28th Annual Meeting of the Working Group Beneficial Arthropods and Entomopathogenic Nematodes; 2010. pp. 92–93. [Google Scholar]
  • Xu, Wang & He (2008).Xu J, Wang Q, He XZ. Emergence and reproductive rhythms of Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) New Zealand Plant Protection. 2008;61:277–282. doi: 10.30843/nzpp.2008.61.6806. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Yu et al. (2003).Yu S-H, Ryoo MI, Na JH, Choi WI. Effect of host density on egg dispersion and the sex ratio of offspring of Bracon hebetor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) Journal of Stored Products Research. 2003;39(4):385–393. doi: 10.1016/S0022-474X(02)00032-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Zaki et al. (1998).Zaki FN, El-Saadany G, Gamma A, Saleh M. Increasing rates of parasitism of the larval parasitoid Bracon brevicornis (Hym., Braconidae) by using kairomones, pheromones and a supplementary food. Journal of Applied Entomology. 1998;122(1–5):565–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1998.tb01546.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. Strains of B. brevicornis and B. hebetor.

Characterization of Bracon brevicornis and Bracon hebetor strains used for laboratory experiments.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11540/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Initial number of replications.

Number of initial replications for evaluation reproductive success of females wasps on a) a single host and b) different numbers of host larvae at different temperatures.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11540/supp-2
Supplemental Information 3. Raw data for experiments of Bracon species on one host larva.

Abbreviations: m = male, f = female, tot=total.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11540/supp-3
Supplemental Information 4. Raw data for experiments of Bracon species on different numbers of host larvae.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11540/supp-4
Supplemental Information 5. Mean numbers of total offspring, males and females from parasitization on different numbers of host larvae at different temperatures.

Mean numbers of total offspring, males and females from parasitization on different numbers of host larvae (5, 10, 15, 20, 25) at different temperatures (12 °C, 20 °C, 27 °C, 36 °C) in Bracon brevicornis and Bracon hebetor. Standard deviations are given in brackets.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11540/supp-5

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements are available in the Supplemental Files.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES