Abstract
AIM
To investigate the causal gene mutation and clinical characteristics for two Chinese families with autosomal dominant congenital coralliform cataract.
METHODS
Two Chinese pedigrees with congenital cataract were investigated. Routine ophthalmic examinations were performed on all patients and non-affected family members. Peripheral blood samples were collected, and the genomic DNAs were extracted. The coding regions of proband's DNAs were analyzed with cataract gene panel. The identified mutation was amplified by polymerase chain reaction, and automated sequencing was performed in other members of two families to verify whether the mutated gene was co-segregated with the disease.
RESULTS
Congenital coralliform cataract was inherited in an autosomal dominant mode in both pedigrees. For each family, more than half of the family members were affected. All patients presented with severe visual impairment after birth as a result of bilateral symmetric coralliform lens opacification. An exact the same defect in the same gene, a heterozygous mutation of c.70C>A (p. P24T) in exon 2 of γD-crystallin gene, was detected in both probands from each family. Sanger sequencing analysis demonstrated that the mutated CRYGD was co-segregated in these two families.
CONCLUSION
A c.70C>A (p. P24T) variant in CRYGD gene was reconfirmed to be the causal gene in two Chinese pedigrees. It is known that mutated CRYGD caused most of the congenital coralliform cataracts, suggesting that the CRYGD gene is associated with coralliform congenital cataract.
Keywords: congenital cataract, mutation, CRYGD gene, autosomal dominant
INTRODUCTION
Congenital cataract is defined as opacity of the crystalline lens that usually presents at birth or short thereafter. It remains the most common cause of lifelong visual impairment in childhood worldwide[1]. As a phenotypically and genotypically heterogeneous disease, up to date, approximately 22.3% of childhood cataracts are inherited[2], with more than 100 genes and about 200 locus (http://cat-map.wustl.edu/) being identified[2]–[3].
Autosomal dominant is the most prevalent inherited manner in congenital cataract[4], and there are at least 34 genes linked to non-syndromic congenital cataracts[2], including genes encoding crystalline proteins (CRYAA, CRYAB, CRYBB, CRYGC, CRYGD), cytoskeletal proteins, membrane proteins, gap junction proteins, and others[4]–[9].
Crystallins are water-soluble lens crystalline proteins and play an essential role in maintaining lens transparency, 90% of the total lens proteins are crystallin[10]–[11]. Mutations in crystalline encoding genes has been reported to induce congenital cataract with a wide variety of phenotypes[11]. In this study, a wide spectrum of cataract gene panel was screened in two unrelated Chinese pedigrees with inherited autosomal dominant congenital cataract, and mutation in CRYGD gene was identified as causal gene of cataract in these two families. The molecular genetic mechanism and clinical characteristics of the two families were evaluated.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Ethical Approval
This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Shenzhen Eye Hospital, Jinan University and Fujian Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Patients
Two unrelated pedigrees with congenital cataract were enrolled in the study, with 42 members (20 patients and 22 normal individuals) in pedigree I (Figure 1, from Xiapu, Fujian Province, China) and 36 individuals (15 patients and 21 normal individuals) in pedigree II (from Shenzhen, China).
Figure 1. Pedigree I: a congenital cataract pedigree inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern.
The square indicates male, the circle indicates female; The filled shape indicates the affected patients with congenital cataract; The arrow indicates the proband.
Clinical Examination
Family histories were obtained from these two pedigrees, and detailed ocular examination was performed for each member. Diagnosis was made by experienced ophthalmologists and the type of cataract was classified according to lens characteristics by slit lamp examination or the images which were recorded before the cataract extraction surgeries. Age at disease onset was defined as the age at which the visual symptom was first noted by patient or his/her family members. When the information regarding the age of disease onset was not available, the age at diagnosis was recorded. Visual acuity (VA) was classified into the following criteria as defined by the World Health Organization. Ten-year follow up has been made for these two families and no other ocular or systemic disorders other than congenital cataract were noticed.
DNA Extraction
Peripheral venous blood was obtained from all members of these two families included in the study. Genomic DNA was isolated and purified from 200 µL venous blood using QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to a standard procedure of the manufacturer. The integrity of the DNA samples was evaluated by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel.
Mutation Screening and Sequence Analysis
Targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) panel containing a large spectrum of 134 cataract-associated genes was used in the research. The 1 to 5 µg genomic DNA from the proband was used for Target-Capture sequencing according to manufacturer protocol.
Sanger Sequencing Validation
The identified mutation was screened via direct automated sequencing to ascertain whether the indicated mutation was co-segregated with the disease phenotype in each of the pedigrees. Based on the Primer Premier 5 software, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers were obtained and synthesized by BGI (BGI-Shenzhen, Guangdong, China). PCR amplification was then performed in other family members of this pedigree. The 30 µL PCR components included 15 µL 2×Taq PCR Master Mix (SinoBio, Shanghai, China), 1.4 µL DNA (30 ng), 0.8 µL of both forward and reverse primers (1.0 µmol/L), and 12 µL ddH2O. The PCR products were first incubated at 95°C for 3min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30s, then annealing at 55°C for 30s, and extension at 72°C for 1min, with final extension at 72°C for 5min. After purification, PCR amplified reactions were sequenced via an ABI 377XL automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The re-assembly DNA sequences were analyzed by the DNA Star software and compared pairwise with reference sequence on Human Genome databases. All identified mutations and its variants were interpreted and classified according to the nomenclature recommended by the Human Genomic Variation Society (HGVS).
RESULTS
Clinical Evaluation
The four-year-old female proband (IV:5) presented with diminished vision in her both eyes since age two and subsequently experienced progressive vision loss. On her last visit, the VA was counting fingers (CF)/30 cm in her right eye and CF/80 cm in her left eye, no improvement with refractive correction. The intraocular pressures were normal bilaterally. Patient had bilateral coralliform shape opacification characterized by the white opaque involving the whole lens except for capsule, with appearance resembling the coralliform shape (Figure 2). Bilateral dilated fundoscopy showed no detectable retinal abnormality. The child was generally healthy without notable systemic abnormalities.
Figure 2. Slit lamp photograph showing representative phenotype of coralliform cataract (IV:5).
Almost the same type of lens opacification as that in pedigree I was noted in pedigree II. The seven-year-old male proband (Figure 3, patient IV:1) manifest with reduced vision in his both eyes since birth and experienced subsequent progressive vision loss. No history of physical and other ocular disease was found. On his last visit, his VA was CF/50 cm in his both eyes, no improvement with refractive correction. The bilateral intraocular pressures were normal. Axial length was 23.63 mm in his right eye and 23.40 mm in his left eye. Bilateral dilated fundoscopy showed no notable abnormality.
Figure 3. Pedigree II: a congenital cataract pedigree inherited in autosomal dominant pattern.
The square indicates male, the circle indicates female; The filled shape indicates the affected patient; The arrow indicates the proband.
Genetic Evaluation
After sequencing the 134 genes of the cataract gene panel for these two probands, we identified a heterozygous missense mutation c.70C>A (p. P24T) in exon 2 of CRYGD gene (Figure 4). The automated Sanger sequencing was used to verify the indicated mutation of CRYGD within the family members of two pedigrees. The mutation in CRYGD was co-segregated with the diseases in these two families.
Figure 4. The mutation in CRYGD was verified using Sanger sequencing in affected patients and unaffected individuals.
Black arrow: C→A transversion induced a threonine substitution for proline at amino acid sequence. A: Patients; B: Normal individuals.
DISCUSSION
Around between 8.3% and 25% of congenital cataracts are inherited and nearly half of inherited cataract are induced by crystallin genes mutation. Crystallin genes encode a wide spectrum of soluble structural proteins in the lens. There are three major types of crystallin genes in human lens including α-, β-, and γ-crystallin[12]. Candidate genes of crystallin for congenital cataract include αA-crystallin (CRYAA), αB-crystallin (CRYAB), βA-crystallin (CRYBA), βB-crystallin (CRYBB), γC-crystallin (CRYGC), and γD-crystallin (CRYGD) genes, one-third of congenital cataract were associated with γD-crystallin, which amounts for 25% of the total crystallin in the human lens. Functionally, αA-crystallin and αB-crystallin have roles in maintaining the solubility of the other lens proteins like β- and γ-crystallin. β-crystallin remains the most elusive in their structural significance due to their greater number of subunits and possible oligomer formations. γ-crystallin proteins folded tightly in two domains, each domain consists of two Greek-key motifs, and a folded hairpin act to maintain the stability between two beta-sheets. The highly expression of γC-crystallin and γD-crystallin are highly expressed in the fiber cells results in embryonic lens nucleus formation. The lens nucleus will remain its transparency owing to the regular micro-architecture and the stability in nucleic fiber, the solubility of lens protein is also essential in maintaining the lens transparency, mutation in CRYGD gene might involve the solubility and stability of the crystallin proteins, subsequently reduce lens transparency causing congenital cataract[13]–[16]. The crystal opacity display irregularly along the peripheral cortical region reveals the restructure of anatomic lens fibers, which influences the light scattering and lens nucleus transparency[17].
In current study, a wide spectrum cataract gene panel screening was performed in two probands from two separate Chinese congenital cataract pedigrees with autosomal dominant inheritance, a heterozygous variant of CRYGD gene in exon 2 (70C>A, P24T) was identified as a disease-causing gene as this mutation was co-segregated with the disease within two families. Previous studies reported that ten mutated variants in CRYGD gene, including P24T, and others such as R15S, R15C, P24S, R37S, R59H, G61C, and Y134X[18]–[20], manifested with vast phenotypic variations as a result of genotypic heterogeneity[18],[21]–[29]. As examples, Y56X, Y134C, and R58H were reported to be related with nuclear cataract, lamellar cataract and aculeiform/coral-like cataract, respectively[22],[30]–[31]. In current study, P24T mutation was associated with coralliform cataract, with most of family members in two Chinese families manifesting with significant coralliform cataract which resulting in severe visual impairment after birth. However, other than coralliform cataract, P24T was also known to be responsible for several different phenotypes of congenital cataract, e.g., cerulean cataract, lamellar cataract, and the fasciculi form cataract[15],[26],[28]–[29],[32], but with coralliform cataract being the most common phenotype from P24T variant in previous reports[17].
Congenital coralliform cataract is closely related to CRYGD mutation, several different mutated variants in CRYGD genes including R15S, R15C, G61C, and P24T mutations cause coralliform cataract. Clinically vast coralliform variations from diverse variants from CRYGD genes[15],[26],[28],[30],[33]. Gu et al[34] found a six-generation Chinese pedigree with R14C in CRYGD presenting with the phenotype of either coralliform or nuclear cataract. In current study variant P24T occurred in two Chines pedigrees presenting with coralliform phenotype as previous demonstration, all affected patients presented with typical symmetric coralliform cataract in their both eyes, with clumps of thick coralliform opacification in the central portion of the lens cortex, across in a radiating direction from the cortical region towards the peripheral capsule, resulting in severe visual impairment after birth, patients had their cataract removal in their young ages. It was different from the effects of R15S mutation of CRYGD gene in previously report, which resulted in bilateral coralliform cataract, but did not have detectable lens opaque until nine years of age. The molecular basis for lens opacification induced by P24T in CRYGD gene remained unclear[18]. Biophysical analysis showed that the solubility of P24T mutant protein is significantly lower than wild-type human γD-crystalline. The understanding of phenotypic characteristic from P24T mutation may suggest the occurrence of a bilateral symmetric severe coralliform cataract at early age after birth may drive an evaluation of the P24T mutation in CRYGD gene[35]–[36]. The CRYGD p.P24T has been detected previously in families with congenital cataract in East Asia and functional analysis showed that the P24T mutated CRYGD played a biological role in cataract formation. Analysis with a 3D structure prediction software indicated that the p.P24T mutant of CRYGD changed a pyrrole ring structure into a hydrophilic structure[37], therefore affecting γD-crystallin's solubility and leading to cataract formation.
In conclusion, a reported P24T mutation of CRYGD gene, occurred in two Chinese pedigrees with bilateral symmetric coralliform cataract, causing severe visual impairment after birth. In current study, CRYGD mutations persistently caused congenital coralliform cataracts, indicating that the coralliform phenotype and the CRYGD gene are closely related.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the two families for granting permission to share their information.
Foundations: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81770924; No.82070963); Fujian Health and Family Planning Research Talent Training Project (No.2017-CX-18).
Conflicts of Interest: Cai SP, None; Lu L, None; Wang XZ, None; Wang Y, None; He F, None; Fan N, None; Weng JN, None; Zhang JH, None; Liu XY, None.
REFERENCES
- 1.Sheeladevi S, Lawrenson JG, Fielder AR, Suttle CM. Global prevalence of childhood cataract: a systematic review. Eye (Lond) 2016;30(9):1160–1169. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Messina-Baas O, Cuevas-Covarrubias SA. Inherited congenital cataract: a guide to suspect the genetic etiology in the cataract genesis. Mol Syndromol. 2017;8(2):58–78. doi: 10.1159/000455752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shiels A, Bennett TM, Hejtmancik JF. Cat-Map: putting cataract on the map. Mol Vis. 2010;16:2007–2015. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hejtmancik JF. Congenital cataracts and their molecular genetics. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2008;19(2):134–149. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shentu XC, Miao Q, Tang XJ, Yin HF, Zhao YY. Identification and functional analysis of a novel MIP gene mutation associated with congenital cataract in a Chinese family. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gao M, Huang SX, Li J, Zou Y, Xu PW, Kang RR, Gao Y. A novel pathogenic mutation of CRYGD gene in a congenital cataract family. Chin J Med Genet. 2016;33(4):515–518. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2016.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Javadiyan S, Craig JE, Souzeau E, Sharma S, Lower KM, Pater J, Casey T, Hodson T, Burdon KP. Recurrent mutation in the crystallin alpha A gene associated with inherited paediatric cataract. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9:83. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1890-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Behnam M, Imagawa E, Chaleshtori AR, Ronasian F, Salehi M, Miyake N, Matsumoto N. A novel homozygous mutation in HSF4 causing autosomal recessive congenital cataract. J Hum Genet. 2016;61(2):177–179. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2015.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bu J, He SJ, Wang LJ, Li JK, Liu J, Zhang XQ. A novel splice donor site mutation in EPHA2 caused congenital cataract in a Chinese family. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016;64(5):364–368. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.185597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Augusteyn RC. On the growth and internal structure of the human lens. Exp Eye Res. 2010;90(6):643–654. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2010.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Iribarren R. Crystalline lens and refractive development. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015;47:86–106. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shiels A, Hejtmancik JF. Mutations and mechanisms in congenital and age-related cataracts. Exp Eye Res. 2017;156:95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2016.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Berry V, Ionides A, Pontikos N, Georgiou M, Yu J, Ocaka LA, Moore AT, Quinlan RA, Michaelides M. The genetic landscape of crystallins in congenital cataract. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01613-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lampi KJ, Wilmarth PA, Murray MR, David LL. Lens β-crystallins: the role of deamidation and related modifications in aging and cataract. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2014;115(1):21–31. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nandrot E, Slingsby C, Basak A, Cherif-Chefchaouni M, Benazzouz B, Hajaji Y, Boutayeb S, Gribouval O, Arbogast L, Berraho A, Abitbol M, Hilal L. Gamma-D crystallin gene (CRYGD) mutation causes autosomal dominant congenital cerulean cataracts. J Med Genet. 2003;40(4):262–267. doi: 10.1136/jmg.40.4.262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Makley LN, McMenimen KA, DeVree BT, et al. Pharmacological chaperone for α-crystallin partially restores transparency in cataract models. Science. 2015;350(6261):674–677. doi: 10.1126/science.aac9145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Amaya L, Taylor D, Russell-Eggitt I, Nischal KK, Lengyel D. The morphology and natural history of childhood cataracts. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;48(2):125–144. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(02)00462-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang LY, Gong B, Tong JP, Fan DS, Chiang SW, Lou DH, Lam DS, Yam GH, Pang CP. A novel gammaD-crystallin mutation causes mild changes in protein properties but leads to congenital coralliform cataract. Mol Vis. 2009;15:1521–1529. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yang GX, Xiong CL, Li SL, Wang YY, Zhao JL. A recurrent mutation in CRYGD is associated with autosomal dominant congenital coralliform cataract in two unrelated Chinese families. Mol Vis. 2011;17:1085–1089. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Messina-Baas OM, Gonzalez-Huerta LM, Cuevas-Covarrubias SA. Two affected siblings with nuclear cataract associated with a novel missense mutation in the CRYGD gene. Mol Vis. 2006;12:995–1000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhuang JF, Cao ZF, Zhu YH, et al. Mutation screening of crystallin genes in Chinese families with congenital cataracts. Mol Vis. 2019;25:427–437. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yang G, Chen Z, Zhang W, Liu Z, Zhao J. Novel mutations in CRYGD are associated with congenital cataracts in Chinese families. Sci Rep. 2016;6:18912. doi: 10.1038/srep18912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tătaru CI, Tătaru CP, Costache A, Boruga O, Zemba M, Ciuluvică RC, Sima G. Congenital cataract-clinical and morphological aspects. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2020;61(1):105–112. doi: 10.47162/RJME.61.1.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yao K, Jin CF, Zhu N, Wang W, Wu RY, Jiang J, Shentu XC. A nonsense mutation in CRYGC associated with autosomal dominant congenital nuclear cataract in a Chinese family. Mol Vis. 2008;14:1272–1276. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Santana A, Waiswol M, Arcieri ES, Cabral de Vasconcellos JP, Barbosa de Melo M. Mutation analysis of CRYAA, CRYGC, and CRYGD associated with autosomal dominant congenital cataract in Brazilian families. Mol Vis. 2009;15:793–800. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.MacKay DS, Andley UP, Shiels A. A missense mutation in the gammaD crystallin gene (CRYGD) associated with autosomal dominant “coral-like” cataract linked to chromosome 2q. Mol Vis. 2004;10:155–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Johnson AC, Lee JW, Harmon AC, Morris Z, Wang XX, Fratkin J, Rapp JP, Gomez-Sanchez E, Garrett MR. A mutation in the start codon of γ-crystallin D leads to nuclear cataracts in the Dahl SS/Jr-Ctr strain. Mamm Genome. 2013;24(3-4):95–104. doi: 10.1007/s00335-013-9447-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Santhiya ST, Shyam Manohar M, Rawlley D, Vijayalakshmi P, Namperumalsamy P, Gopinath PM, Löster J, Graw J. Novel mutations in the gamma-crystallin genes cause autosomal dominant congenital cataracts. J Med Genet. 2002;39(5):352–358. doi: 10.1136/jmg.39.5.352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shentu XC, Yao K, Xu W, Zheng S, Hu SN, Gong XH. Special fasciculiform cataract caused by a mutation in the gammaD-crystallin gene. Mol Vis. 2004;10:233–239. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pande A, Pande J, Asherie N, Lomakin A, Ogun O, King J, Benedek GB. Crystal cataracts: human genetic cataract caused by protein crystallization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(11):6116–6120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.101124798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.de Figueirêdo ES, Giordano GG, Tavares A, da Silva MJ, de Vasconcellos JP, Arieta CE, de Melo MB. Novel human CRYGD rare variant in a Brazilian family with congenital cataract. Mol Vis. 2011;17:2207–2211. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Burdon KP, Wirth MG, MacKey DA, Russell-Eggitt IM, Craig JE, Elder JE, Dickinson JL, Sale MM. Investigation of crystallin genes in familial cataract, and report of two disease associated mutations. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(1):79–83. doi: 10.1136/bjo.88.1.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pande A, Annunziata O, Asherie N, Ogun O, Benedek GB, Pande J. Decrease in protein solubility and cataract formation caused by the Pro23 to Thr mutation in human gamma D-crystallin. Biochemistry. 2005;44(7):2491–2500. doi: 10.1021/bi0479611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gu F, Li R, Ma XX, Shi LS, Huang SZ, Ma X. A missense mutation in the gammaD-crystallin gene CRYGD associated with autosomal dominant congenital cataract in a Chinese family. Mol Vis. 2006;12:26–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Evans P, Wyatt K, Wistow GJ, Bateman OA, Wallace BA, Slingsby C. The P23T cataract mutation causes loss of solubility of folded gammaD-crystallin. J Mol Biol. 2004;343(2):435–444. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jung J, Byeon IJ, Wang YT, King J, Gronenborn AM. The structure of the cataract-causing P23T mutant of human gammaD-crystallin exhibits distinctive local conformational and dynamic changes. Biochemistry. 2009;48(12):2597–2609. doi: 10.1021/bi802292q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li B, Lu B, Guo XW, Hu SH, Zhao GH, Huang WH, Hu JZ, Song K. Two pathogenic gene mutations identified associating with congenital cataract and iris coloboma respectively in a Chinese family. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:7054315. doi: 10.1155/2020/7054315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]