Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is strongly associated with metabolic dysregulations/deregulations and hyperglycemia is a common metabolic disturbance in metabolic diseases. Hyperglycemia is defined to promote epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) of cancer cells in various cancers but its molecular contribution to HCC progression and aggressiveness is relatively unclear. In this study, we analyzed the molecular mechanisms behind the hyperglycemia-induced EMT in HCC cell lines. Here, we report that high glucose promotes EMT through activating c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase via promoting its ligand-independent homodimerization. c-Met activation is critical for high glucose induced acquisition of mesenchymal phenotype, survival under high glucose stress and reprogramming of cellular metabolism by modulating glucose metabolism gene expression to promote aggressiveness in HCC cells. The crucial role of c-Met in high glucose induced EMT and aggressiveness may be the potential link between metabolic syndrome-related hepatocarcinogenesis and/or HCC progression. Considering c-Met inhibition in hyperglycemic patients would be an important complementary strategy for therapy that favors sensitization of HCC cells to therapeutics.
Subject terms: Cancer microenvironment, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Epithelial-mesenchymal transition, Cell signalling, Cancer, Cell biology
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) constitutes the majority (75–90%) of primary liver cancers1. Described risk factors of HCC include hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, exposure to dietary aflatoxin, fatty liver disease, alcohol induced cirrhosis, obesity, smoking, diabetes and iron overload. Even many preventive strategies such as hepatitis immunization, lifestyle modifications and population screening are developed to reduce incidence of HCC, prevalence of HCC is still increasing2. Liver cancer is reported as one of the metabolism associated cancers and increasing incidence of liver cancer is explained by contribution of metabolic dysregulations such as obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)3.
Hyperglycemia, as a result of metabolic conditions such as insulin resistance, obesity and T2DM, contributes to progression of many cancer types3–5. Besides inducing proliferation, invasion and motility, high glucose can modulate various signaling pathways. Inadequate maintenance of blood glucose was reported to be significantly associated with recurrence and poor survival of HCC patients after therapy6. Additionally, hyperglycemia has been reported to induce EMT in many cancer cells through aberrant activation of various oncogenic pathways7–9.
c-Met, a membrane receptor tyrosine kinase, is upregulated in liver diseases and favors hepatocyte proliferation, plasticity and regeneration10. In addition to its potential benefits in chronic liver diseases, c-Met activation induces initiation, development and progression of HCC through inducing EMT and promoting aggressive phenotype10,11. c-Met is an important component of EMT and mesenchymal phenotype in HCC12.
Metabolic reprogramming is a crucial component of epithelial/mesenchymal (E/M) phenotype switch but also, cellular metabolism has been described as an upstream regulator of cellular plasticity13. Accumulating data suggest that molecular reprogramming of metabolism and EMT are interdependent events and, both potentially modulate the other13. Metabolic reprogramming considered as a hallmark of cancer14 and increasing evidence indicate that mesenchymal cancer cells have different metabolic needs compared to their epithelial counterparts to satisfy the metabolic demands of motility and invasion15.
However, the regulatory molecular network between EMT and metabolic reprogramming and contribution of c-Met signaling to this interaction is still relatively unclear.
In this study, we investigate the role of c-Met signaling in hyperglycemia-induced EMT and reprogramming of glucose metabolism in HCC cells.
Results
High glucose promotes mesenchymal phenotype and induces motility and invasion in HCC cell lines
To investigate the effect of high glucose on E/M phenotype, we analyzed F-actin fibril organization in HuH-7 and SNU-449 cells via fluorescent-conjugated Phalloidin staining. High glucose exposure increased F-Actin staining intensity (Supplementary Fig. 1a) and modulated cellular morphology to attain spindle-like shape (Fig. 1a,b). To see the effect of high glucose on E/M molecular phenotype, we analyzed the expression of mesenchymal phenotype biomarkers N-Cadherin and Vimentin protein expression in HCC cells. High glucose induced N-Cadherin expression in all tested cell lines and Vimentin expression in SNU-449 (Fig. 1c–e).
Subsequently, we analyzed motility and invasion abilities of HuH-7, SNU-449 and SK-HEP-1 cells. High glucose exposure significantly increased motility and invasion capacity of SNU-449 and SK-HEP-1 whereas the increase in HuH-7 motility was not statistically significant (Fig. 1f–h). In addition to the increasing individual cell motility in trans-well assays, high glucose exposure enhanced wound closure ability of all cell lines tested (Fig. 1i, SNU-449; Supplementary Fig. 1b, HuH-7 and SK-HEP-1).
Briefly, high glucose induced acquisition of mesenchymal phenotype and enhanced motility and invasion ability of HCC cells.
High glucose does not induce glucose toxicity but enhances spheroid formation in HCC cells
Increased glucose concentration in microenvironment promotes glucose-induced toxicity and suppresses cell viability in mammalian cells16. For culturing HCC cells which were used in this study, low glucose supplemented DMEM is recommended. To investigate whether glucose deprivation or high glucose concentrations promote cell death, we analyzed cell viability and proliferation with MTT assay under conditions with increasing glucose concentrations starting from 0 to 50 mM. MTT assay was performed with HuH-7, HepG2, SK-HEP-1 and SNU-449 cell lines which were cultured with glucose deprived (no-glucose, 0 mM) or normo-glucose (5.5 mM) and high glucose (25–50 mM) supplemented media. As expected, HCC cells were resistant to glucose toxicity and glucose treatment did not show any detrimental effect on cell viability rather induced proliferation in tested concentrations. Additionally, glucose deprivation did not induce cell death but lowered the proliferation rate (Fig. 2a–d). To investigate the effect of glucose level on survival of HCC cells, we performed sulforhodamine (SRB) assay with HuH-7, HepG2, SK-HEP-1 and SNU-449 cells. As expected, high glucose did not affect survival of HCC cell lines (Fig. 2e–h).
Spheroid formation ability and survival in adhesion-independent conditions are two important markers of aggressive cell behavior in cancer progression and metastasis17. To investigate their spheroid formation and adhesion-independent survival ability, HuH-7 and SNU-449 cells were cultured in hanging droplets of starvation and high glucose (25 mM) culture media. Consistent with the viability and proliferation data, both cell lines expanded the dimensions of spheroids in high glucose conditions (Fig. 2i,j).
To summarize, high glucose treatment does not promote glucose induced toxicity in HCC cells but improves cell proliferation and spheroid formation abilities. Additionally, glucose deprivation does not promote cell death but lowers proliferation rate of HCC cells.
High glucose exposure activates c-Met and downstream signaling via promoting ligand-independent homodimerization
Induction of mesenchymal phenotype and aggressive behavior are well-defined consequences of c-Met activation in HCC18–20. To understand the contribution of c-Met signaling to high glucose induced EMT, we investigated c-Met expression and activation in response to high glucose exposure. Time-dependent activation and expression of c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase were analyzed in HuH-7, HepG2, SNU-449 and SK-HEP-1 cell lines and high glucose exposure increased c-Met activation (phospho-Met Y1234/Y1235), protein expression (Fig. 3a) and transcription (Supplementary Fig. 1c) in all HCC cell lines tested. Induction of c-Met activation and expression were confirmed with immunofluorescence staining of c-Met activatory phosphorylations and total c-Met protein in HuH-7 and SNU-449 cells (Fig. 3b,c). When compared with the physiological glucose levels (5.5 mM), high glucose increases c-Met activation (phospho-Met, Y1234/Y1235) and expression in HCC cell lines (Supplementary Fig. 1d). To investigate whether glucose-induced c-Met activation promotes signal transduction through downstream, secondary effectors of c-Met signaling were analyzed by immunoblotting. We analyzed activation (phospho-Erk1/2, T202/Y204) and expression of Erk1/2 and expression of Egr-1, a well-defined EMT-related transcription factor21, in HuH-7 and SNU-449 cells. High glucose treatment increased Erk1/2 activation and Egr-1 expression in SNU-449 and HuH-7 cells (Fig. 3d,e).
Activation mechanisms of c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase vary according to the cellular contexts and microenvironment components11. To test the potential role of autocrine HGF secretion in high glucose induced c-Met activity, we analyzed HGF concentrations in conditioned media of HCC cells via sandwich ELISA method. HGF levels were not detectable in both starvation and high glucose conditions, which indicate high glucose induces c-Met activation in a ligand-independent manner (Fig. 3f).
For acquiring a better understanding of glucose-induced c-Met activation mechanism, we analyzed c-Met homodimerization in response to high glucose exposure by immunoprecipitating c-Met with prior use of the crosslinker Sulfo-EGS in HCC cells. High glucose exposure promoted homodimerization of c-Met in HuH-7, SNU-449, HepG2 and SK-HEP-1 cell lines (Fig. 3g–j).
To summarize, high glucose exposure induces expression and activation through receptor homodimerization and downstream signal transduction of c-Met but does not promote autocrine HGF secretion in HCC cells.
c-Met activity is crucial for acquisition of high glucose induced aggressive behavior
To test the necessity of c-Met activation in acquisition of high glucose induced aggressive phenotype in HCC, we performed a set of experiments by inhibiting c-Met activity with a c-Met specific small molecule inhibitor, SU11274. c-Met inhibitor was effective to repress high-glucose induced c-Met activation in HuH-7, SNU-449, HepG2 and SK-HEP-1 cells (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Additionally, we analyzed and visualized the inhibition of c-Met activity by SU11274 via immunofluorescence staining of c-Met activation (phospho-Met, Y1234/Y1235) and total protein expression in HuH-7 (Fig. 4a) and SNU-449 (Fig. 4b) cells.
After confirmation of efficient inhibition of c-Met activity, we investigated the effects of c-Met inhibition on high glucose induced EMT and mesenchymal phenotype. Specific inhibition of c-Met kinase activity changed cell morphology from spindle-shape (mesenchymal-like) to wide-round (epithelial-like) cell shape (Fig. 4c,d) and decreased F-actin fibril staining intensity (Supplementary Fig. 1a) in HuH-7 and SNU-449 cells. To investigate the effect of c-Met inhibition on aggressiveness, we analyzed wound healing, motility and invasion capacity of HCC cells. c-Met activity inhibition significantly repressed trans-well migration and invasion capacity of HCC cells (Fig. 4e,f). Wound closure capacity of cells was decreased in all tested HCC cell lines (Fig. 4g, SNU-449; Supplementary Fig. 1b, HuH-7 and SK-HEP-1).
As reported in previous studies, high glucose induces apoptosis in normal mammalian cells whereas resistance to apoptosis is defined as a distinctive cancer hallmark14,22,23. To address the effect of c-Met kinase activity inhibition on resistance to glucose toxicity, we analyzed apoptotic activity of HCC cells with Annexin-V/PI staining in flow cytometry. Inhibition of c-Met kinase activity increased sensitivity to glucose toxicity by promoting apoptosis in all HCC cell lines tested (Fig. 4h).
Overall, c-Met is required to acquire high glucose induced aggressive phenotype in HCC cells. High glucose induced aggressive phenotype can be reversed by c-Met inhibition.
Inhibition of c-Met kinase activity reverses glycolytic gene expression pattern in HCC cells
Having observed the significant regulatory role of high glucose on c-Met signaling pathway in-vitro, we performed bioinformatic analysis to see the effect of c-Met expression level in patients’ data. First, we evaluated the effect of MET expression on cellular pathways and gene transcription profiles. We analyzed TCGA HCC tissue sample gene expression data by grouping the tumor tissue samples into quartiles according to their normalized MET mRNA expression levels. Then, we performed differential gene expression (DEG) analysis between low-MET expressing quartile (Q1) and high-MET expression quartile (Q4) and, analyzed enriched pathways associated with DEGs with ClusterProfiler24. In pathway enrichment analysis, carbohydrate metabolism was listed as one of the most over-represented pathways and in addition to carbohydrate metabolism, many metabolism pathways were enriched in pathway over-representation analysis (Supplementary Fig. 2b). DisGeNET25, gene-disease association enrichment analysis showed that Diabetes Mellitus and Hyperglycemia were in the list of the most associated diseases with the enriched DEGs (Supplementary Fig. 2c). After observing a strong relation with glucose metabolism in enrichment analyses, we analyzed and visualized fold change differences of DEGs in “central carbon metabolism in cancer” pathway with Pathview26. The expression of glucokinase, glucose transporter and glutaminase genes were significantly increased in high-MET expressing groups, whereas hexokinase, pyruvate kinase and phosphofructokinase genes were significantly decreased (Supplementary Fig. 2d).
Having determined the potential role of c-Met on tumor metabolism by bioinformatic analysis, we tested the effects of c-Met inhibition on glucose metabolism genes. We analyzed expression of glucose metabolism genes by quantitative RT-PCR array in the presence of high glucose (25 mM) and/or c-Met inhibitor SU11274 in SNU-449 HCC cell line. The RT-PCR array was composed of the genes that function in glycolysis, glucose metabolism regulation, the citric acid cycle (TCA), pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) and glycogenesis. Heat-map analysis of glucose metabolism gene expression array revealed a significant switch in glucose metabolism related gene expression in response to inhibition of c-Met kinase activity (Fig. 5a). Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis revealed that inhibition of c-Met kinase activity repressed expression of genes taking part in glycolysis (HK2, PFKL, PGAM2, PKLR), glucose metabolism regulation (PDK2, PDPR), TCA cycle (MDH1B), pentose phosphate pathway (H6PD), glycogen synthesis (GYS1) and regulation (PHKG1) while upregulating PYGM gene that takes role in glycogen break-down, significantly. Subsequent quantitative RT-qPCR analysis was performed to confirm RT-PCR array results. In addition to the genes analyzed by RT-PCR array, we analyzed expression of glucose transporters (GLUTs) and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinases (PDKs). c-Met inhibition changed glucose metabolism related gene expression enormously in SNU-449 cells. Expression of GYS1, H6PD, HK2, MDH1B, PDK2, PDK4, PDPR, PFKL, PHKG1, PKLR and glucose transporter SLC2A1 (GLUT1) were repressed by inhibition of c-Met kinase activity in SNU-449 cells, significantly (Fig. 5b). In addition to SNU-449, we analyzed the expression of DEGs in SK-HEP-1 cell line but the effect of c-Met kinase activity inhibition on DEGs were different in SK-HEP-1 cells. c-Met tyrosine kinase inhibition repressed expression of HK2, MDH1B, PFKL and SLC2A1, whereas increased H6PD expression in SK-HEP-1 cells, significantly (Fig. 5c). Finally, we investigated the effects of high glucose induction and inhibition of c-Met kinase activity on oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) in Met-expressing mouse-derived hepatoma cell line Hepa1-6 via Seahorse XFe96 instrument. Hepa1-6 cell line is a well-known mouse cell line with elevated expression and activation of c-Met27. First, we analyzed protein expression and activation of c-Met in low glucose (LG), high glucose (HG) and c-Met tyrosine kinase activity inhibitor supplemented high glucose conditions (HGi) to confirm the effect of high glucose exposure on c-Met activity and inhibitor efficiency (Supplementary Fig. 2e). High glucose exposure decreased OCR and did not change ECAR level when compared to normo-glucose condition. c-Met activity inhibition (HGi) improved OCR and decreased ECAR when compared to HG (Supplementary Fig. 2f).
Subsequently, we tested our in vitro findings by performing further bioinformatic analysis. We analyzed expression of MET, its ligand HGF and DEGs (GYS1, H6PD, HK2, MDH1B, PDK2, PDK4, PDPR, PFKL, PHKG1, PKLR and SLC2A1) in normal and tumor tissues of liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) cohort of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) via UALCAN28. Consistent with the literature, MET expression was significantly elevated in tumor tissues independent of its ligand HGF. Most of the genes that were downregulated in SNU-449 cells by c-Met kinase activity inhibition were elevated in patient derived tumor tissues, significantly. GYS1, H6PD, HK2, MDH1B, PDK4, PDPR, PFKL, PHKG1, PKLR and SLC2A1 (GLUT1) gene expressions were significantly higher in tumor tissues than normal tissues (Fig. 5d). Overall survival analysis among Low-MET and High-MET quartiles showed that patients in the high-MET expressing group had significantly shorter survival time (Fig. 5f). Additionally, significant increase of expression in tumor tissues, high expression of GYS1, HK2 and SLC2A were significantly correlated with decreased survival of LIHC patients in the TCGA cohort (Fig. 5g).
Furthermore, we performed a comparison analysis between TCGA quartiles that were grouped according to the MET expression levels. We analyzed expression of HGF, DEGs (GYS1, H6PD, HK2, MDH1B, PDK2, PDK4, PDPR, PFKL, PGAM2, PHKG1, PKLR, PYGM and SLC2A1), additional isoforms of hexokinases (HK1) and glucose transporters (SLC2A2, SLC2A3) which are reported to be expressed in HCC cells and tissues in previous studies29,30. H6PD, PDK2, PDK4, PDPR, PKLR and SLC2A2 expressions were significantly higher in high-MET expressing groups whereas GYS1, HK1, HK2 and SLC2A1 expressions were significantly lower. There was not any significant change in the expressions of HGF, MDH1B, PFKL, PGAM2, PHKG1, PYGM and SLC2A4 among quartile groups (Fig. 5e).
In conclusion, c-Met inhibition downregulates expression of genes that take part in fueling the glucose metabolism but, its effect on particular genes is context and cell type dependent (Supplementary Table 1). Tumor tissues with high c-Met expression level in TCGA have increased expression of H6PD, PDK2, PDK4, PDPR, PKLR, SLC2A2 genes whereas decreased expression of GYS1, HK1, HK2, SLC2A1, significantly. Overall, c-Met expression levels and activation status have regulatory effects on glucose metabolism gene expression.
Discussion
HCC is a complex disease and treatment options remain limited with little progress over the last decades. There is an alarming increase in the incidence of metabolic disorders characterized by elevated levels of blood glucose including diabetes and obesity that reflects the increase in the incidence of HCC31.
It has been known that consistent high glucose levels in the bloodstream cause glucose toxicity in normal cells leading to cellular damage and organ dysfunction16. However, in cancer cells there is a huge demand on energy for rapid proliferation and expansion that are mostly provided by utilization of glucose32. Disturbance of blood glucose has been reported to be significantly associated with recurrence and poor survival of HCC patients6. Several studies highlight the importance of lowering blood glucose in HCC patients for improving survival, the use of metformin and glucose starvation are among such strategies that were shown to significantly decrease HCC migration, invasion and EMT33,34. Therefore, efforts in keeping the blood glucose levels low are expected to contribute to patient survival in many dimensions and have the potential to serve as an Achilles’ heel in cancer therapy. Several studies support the role of increased glucose levels in the activation of EMT and the metastatic phenotype through promoting aberrant regulation of signaling pathways7–9. However, the contribution of hyperglycemia to EMT mediated progression in HCC and related mechanisms remains still unclear. Recalling, highly metastatic nature of the HCC, we investigated the link between hyperglycemia and EMT that are critically important in the acquisition of aggressive phenotype, and identified that high glucose treatment: (i) induced ligand independent homodimerization of c-Met (ii) activated Tyr1234/1235 phosphorylation of c-Met and downstream signaling. (iii) promoted EMT, (iv) induced motility and invasion, as well as spheroid formation. (v) Inhibition of c-Met kinase activity altered expression patterns of genes that play roles in glucose metabolism, (vi) reversed high glucose induced aggressive phenotype and (vii) increased apoptotic cell death under high glucose treatment (Fig. 6).
c-Met signaling pathway plays a pivotal role in embryonic development and through life via mediating complex biological processes including cell survival, proliferation, EMT, migration, invasion and morphogenesis10–12. Aberrant activation of c-Met signaling contributes to tumor progression and recurrence as well as therapy resistance in HCC via inducing EMT like properties and protecting cells from apoptosis10,11. Induction of mesenchymal phenotype and aggressive behavior are well-defined consequences of c-Met activation in HCC18–20. We and others identified that c-Met is mostly activated by ligand-independent mechanisms in HCC including chromosomal or mutational re-arrangements, receptor crosstalk, noncoding RNAs, and heparan sulfate proteoglycans11,35. In this study, we also determined that c-Met signaling was activated in a glucose (25 mM) rich microenvironment in HCC. Although high glucose (40 mM)- induced c-Met activation has been previously reported in cultured renal epithelium cells36, there was not any evidence that explains the potential mechanism behind receptor activation. Indeed, to the best of our knowledge, there is no study evaluating involvement of high glucose treatment in acquisition of aggressive phenotype via regulating c-Met signaling in HCC. Our data demonstrated that high glucose-induced activation of c-Met signaling leads to EMT and changes glucose metabolism gene expression which in turn provides survival advantage to HCC cells. Jin et al. also demonstrated that receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) including c-Met preferentially rewired the metabolic network and protected BAF3 isogenic cells from glucose deprivation induced cell death37. Overall, while high glucose induces cell death in normal epithelial cells, c-Met activation provides survival advantage to cancer cells when increased glucose availability is fluctuating in the environment. Our data also showed that HCC cells developed survival mechanisms via c-Met and were able to survive when glucose is deprived or abundant in the microenvironment. Importantly, cells cultured in high glucose supplemented conditions underwent apoptosis when c-Met kinase activity was inhibited by a specific inhibitor. Another important outcome of c-Met inhibition under high glucose conditions was reversion of EMT and inhibition of aggressive phenotype.
During progression of EMT, cellular metabolism is fine-tuned to meet the increased bioenergetic demands of the cell getting through the challenges of phenotype transition38,39. c-Met activation synergistically cooperates with signaling pathways involved in metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells in HCC cells. The cause and consequence link between metabolic reprogramming of the cell and EMT is still an ongoing discussion but accumulating data show that they are interdependent programs13. Increased motility of mesenchymal cells generates a significant demand for energy metabolites in mesenchymal cells when compared with their epithelial counterparts. Hyperglycemic microenvironment enhances increased glucose uptake and glycolysis in cancer cells and maintains an acidic microenvironment that selects motile and invasive cells40–43. From this point of view, we performed bioinformatic analysis to see whether c-Met has a role in reprogramming of metabolism-related gene expressions in TCGA-LIHC primary HCC tissues. Bioinformatic analysis pointed out that genes (GYS1, H6PD, HK2, MDH1B, PDK4, PDPR, PFKL, PHKG1, PKLR and SLC2A1) that regulates both glycolysis, glycogenesis and citric acid cycle are elevated in liver tumor tissues compared to normal liver tissues. These findings imply that HCC metabolism is flexible and can operate glycolysis and OXPHOS preferentially to adapt the mechanisms of energy production to microenvironmental changes as well as differences in tumor energy needs. In order to further analyze the regulatory role of c-Met expression level on glucose metabolism, we grouped tumor tissue samples into quartiles according to their MET expression levels to compare the four distinctive groups. As expected, there was a significant difference in the expression pattern of genes that plays a role in metabolism and metabolic diseases when “Low-MET” expressing and “High-MET” expressing HCC tissues compared to each other. Some of these genes (H6PD, PDK2, PDK4, PDPR, PKLR and SLC2A2) were specifically higher in high c-MET expressing groups. Also, we observed a gradual increase into quartiles relative to their MET expression level. Despite the fact that, there are some studies reported HGF-induced glycolytic phenotype in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma44,45 or hepatocellular carcinoma cells27, in accordance with our in vitro findings, HGF expression among the groups was not different.
When we further analyzed the regulatory role of c-Met signaling on glucose metabolism genes via gene expression array and RT-qPCR upon c-Met activity inhibition we have observed that this effect is mostly cell type or context dependent. Among the many genes that we analyzed, expressions of GYS1, H6PD, HK2, MDH1B, PDK2, PDK4, PDPR, PFKL, PHKG1, PKLR and SLC2A1 genes were downregulated by c-Met inhibitor treatment in SNU-449 cell line. Whereas in SK-HEP-1 cells, four of these genes, HK2, MDH1B, PFKL and SLC2A1, were downregulated upon c-Met activity inhibition.
These findings further support the fact that HCC metabolism is flexible and c-Met signaling seems to be important to attain this metabolic flexibility depending on the cell type and environmental conditions. Jin et al. reported that labeled glucose was mostly incorporated with lactate and alanine in MET-overexpressing BAF3 cells37 which supports the potential of c-Met fueling glycolysis and promoting Warburg effect driven metastasis. Additionally, Huang et al. reported ligand dependent c-Met activation promotes Warburg effect by increasing glucose consumption, lactate production and DNA synthesis of HCC cells27.
Taken together, the modulatory role of c-Met activity on expression of indicated glucose metabolism genes in HCC is reported for the first time in this study. Together with the literature, there is still more room to investigate the role of c-Met in glucose metabolism related gene expression and cancer cell metabolic regulation in detail with both cancer progression and therapy resistance perspectives. Increasing numbers of data on the effect of c-Met pathway on glucose metabolism of cancer cells is accumulating and our study points out the potential targets for the first time and emphasizes the role of c-Met through a ligand-independent activation mechanism in hyperglycemic conditions. Future studies with animal models and patients are better to be planned to enlighten this critical phenomenon.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
All Human HCC cell lines were kindly provided by Prof. Mehmet Öztürk (IBG Center, Izmir, Turkey). SNU-449, SK-HEP-1, HepG2 and HuH-7 cell lines were cultured as described previously46. All cell lines were authenticated by STR profiling and tested for mycoplasma infection and confirmed as negative before the experiments. SU11274 (Calbiochem, 448101) was solubilized in DMSO and used with 2.5 µM concentration. HCC cells starved with 2% FBS supplemented culture media without glucose for 24 h before the experiments to down-regulate basal c-Met activity. After starvation, cells were treated with high glucose (25 mM) and 2% FBS supplemented culture media for 16 h. Details of cell culture media and supplements are listed in Supplementary document.
mRNA isolation
NucleoSpin RNA Isolation kit (Macherey–Nagel, Germany) was used for mRNA isolation according to the manufacturer’s instructions. mRNA was eluted with DNAse/RNAse free distilled water and its concentration was measured by NanoDrop.
Reverse transcription and RT-qPCR
SensiFast™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bioline Meridian Bioscience, USA) was used to transcribe cDNA from mRNA. qPCR reactions were performed with primers (Supplementary Table 2) designed specifically for cDNA sequences of gene of interest (CDS) from NCBI-Genbank. RT-qPCR analysis was performed as described previously12 via using SensiFast™ SYBR No-ROX kit (Bioline Meridian Bioscience, USA) with ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Scientific, USA). At least three biological experiments were performed to analyze and do statistical analysis.
Immunoblotting
The cells were lysed with RIPA lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–CL pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCI, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 1% NP-40) containing 1 mM Na3VO2, 1 mM NaF, 1× phosSTOP (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and 1× protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and the lysates were subjected to immunoblotting assay as described previously46. Primary antibodies are listed in Supplementary Table 3. At least three biological replicates per experimental setup were performed for each HCC cell line tested. Immunoblots were developed with LI-COR Odyssey CLx and Biorad ChemiDoc MP imaging systems. Brightness and contrast adjustments of the gel/membrane images were performed with Keynote presentation software in MacOS. Unprocessed images of gels and membranes are presented in Supplementary document.
Immunofluorescent analysis of the cells
HCC cells were grown on glass cover-slips and after experimental conditions were set, cells were stained with fluorochrome-labeled antibodies as described previously19. Imaging was performed with up-right fluorescence microscope (Olympus—BX61) and Zeiss LSM 880-Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy with Airyscan at IBG Optic Imaging Core Facility. Two biological replicates per condition were analyzed. Corrected total cell fluorescence (CTCF) measurements of Phalloidin staining was performed with biological image analysis program Fiji47.
Trans-well motility and invasion assays
Trans-well inserts with 8 µm pore size (SPL Life Sciences, #37224, Korea) were used to analyze motility and invasion ability of HCC cells. Trans-well motility and invasion experiments were performed as described in previous study46. Two biological replicates (each has three or four technical replicates per condition) were conducted to generate statistical analysis.
Wound-healing assay
Cells were seeded on 24-well tissue culture plates with concentrations sufficient to reach 70%-80% confluency next day. Cells were incubated for 24 h with 2% FBS supplemented culture media without glucose supplementation. Scratching performed with 200 μl pipette tips. Wells were washed with medium twice to remove cells detached with scratching. Fresh 2% FBS supplemented culture media without glucose supplementation was added to the wells and cells were incubated for 24 h. During this period, the gap was imaged in real-time via an automated microscope for live cell imaging (CellDiscoverer7, ZEISS) and images of time-points 6 h, 12 h and 24 h were analyzed for wound closure analysis. Gap distance was calculated via ImageJ program and the results were analyzed by Microsoft Excel. Experiments without real-time imaging equipment were performed as the same and images were collected before and after 24-h incubation. Three biological replicates (each has three or four technical replicates) were conducted to generate statistical analysis.
Hanging drop spheroid formation assay
HCC cells (2500 cells) cultured in 20 µl of cell culture media supplemented with experimental conditions for 72 h and spheroids were imaged under Zeiss Stemi 508 stereo microscope. Experiment was conducted as previously described12. Two biological replicates (each has 40 hanging-drops per condition) were performed to generate statistical analysis.
Phalloidin staining
HCC cells were seeded on glass cover slips and incubated overnight for adhesion. Alexa Fluor™ 488 Phalloidin (Invitrogen, #A12379 ) staining was performed as previously described for adhesion. Alexa Fluor™ 488 Phalloidin (Invitrogen, #A12379 ) staining was performed as previously described48. Imaging was performed at IBG Optic Imaging Core Facility with fluorescent microscope (Olympus—BX61).
ELISA
After 24 h incubation with starvation media (2% FBS , without glucose), HuH-7, HepG2, SNU-449, SK-HEP-1 cells were cultured for 16 h with culture media supplemented with experimental conditions. Conditioned-media was collected and analyzed with HGF Human ELISA Kit (Life Technologies, #KAC2211) to measure secreted HGF concentration. Three biological replicates (each has five technical replicates) were conducted to generate statistical analysis.
Crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (IP)
HuH-7, HepG2, SNU-449 and SK-HEP-1 were seeded on 150 mm dishes. After experimental conditions set, cells were washed with 1× PBS for three times and cross-linked by culturing with 0.5 mM ethylene glycol bis (sulfosuccinimidyl succinate) (SULFO-EGS) (Pierce, 21565) for 2 h at 4 °C. c-Met antibody was used to precipitate c-Met protein and protein G Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare, #17_0618_01) were used to capture protein-antibody conjugate. Immunoprecipitation experiments were performed as previously described18. Two biological replicates were performed.
Analysis of gene expressions in TCGA-LIHC dataset
Expression of MET, HGF and glucose metabolism genes in normal and tumor tissues were performed with UALCAN28 and Kaplan–Meier survival graphs were generated by GEPIA49. Normalized mRNA expression data of HCC tumor tissues in TCGA-LIHC dataset was downloaded from cBioPortal50,51 and samples were grouped into quartiles according to the level of normalized MET expression counts. Pathway24 and disease-gene network (DisGeNET)25 enrichment analyses were performed with ClusterProfiler24 package in R. Visualization of the fold difference of differentially expressed genes between low-MET expressing quartile (Q1) and high-MET expressing quartile (Q4) in KEGG pathway was performed with ClusterProfiler package in R. The results reported here are in whole or part based upon data generated by the TCGA Research Network: https://www.cancer.gov/tcga.
PCR array
RT2 Profiler PCR arrays for glucose metabolism genes were provided from Qiagen and analysis was performed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. mRNA isolation and cDNA synthesis for PCR arrays were performed with miRNeasy RNA isolation kit (Qiagen) and RT2 First Strand Kit (Qiagen), respectively. Integrity and quality of isolated mRNA was confirmed with formamide supplemented denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis and confirmed samples were progressed through cDNA synthesis. Three biological replicates were conducted to generate array analysis.
MTT assay
HCC cells (1000 cells/well) were seeded on 96-well plates and incubated for 24, 48 and 72 h. MTT analysis was performed as described previously52. Measured absorbances were analyzed by Microsoft Excel 2016 and plotted by Prism 8. Three biological replicates (each has five technical replicates per condition) were conducted to generate statistical analysis.
SRB assay
HCC cells (1000 cells/well) were seeded on 96-well plates. TCA solution was added on cells for fixation. Plates were incubated for an hour in the incubator. Plates were air dried and treated with Sulforhodamine B solution, 1% acetic acid and 10 mM Tris, respectively. Measured absorbances (565 nm) were analyzed by Microsoft Excel 2016 and plotted by Prism 8. Three biological replicates (each has five technical replicates per condition) were conducted to generate statistical analysis.
Basal ECAR and OCR analysis
For basal OCR and ECAR analysis, 10,000 Hepa1-6 cells were seeded on Seahorse XFe96 (Seahorse Bioscience, Agilent) cell culture plates and cultured within the relevant conditions. Three independent experiments were set as including relevant conditions with > 9 technical replicates. 30 min prior to the assay, cells were given XF Base medium (Seahorse Bioscience, Agilent) supplemented with 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 10 mM glucose (pH 7.4). Basal ECAR and OCR rates were measured for 4 times.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism version 8.2.1 for MacOS, GraphPad Software, San Diego, California USA, https://www.graphpad.com. Statistical methods included Analysis of variance (ANOVA), Mann–Whitney, Student’s t-test, one sample t test and linear regression tests. Results with p < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. If significant, significance values of the statistical analysis were represented as following: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001, **** p ≤ 0.0001.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We thank Prof. Dr. Mehmet Ozturk for providing HCC cells, Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center for establishment of required technical and instrumental infrastructure for this study, Prof. Dr. Jan-Wilhelm Kornfeld and Dr. Matteo Oliverio for their support in Seahorse experiments and Dr. Yasemin Öztemur Islakoğlu for her kind contribution to bioinformatic data analysis. This research was funded by “Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)” with the grant number of “114S359”.
Author contributions
H.T. wrote the main manuscript and prepared the manuscript and experimental figures, and performed experiments. E.B., Y.Y., A.G., G.B., D.C., P.K., and E.K. performed the experiments, prepared experimental figures, revised and edited the text. N.A. revised and edited the manuscript, supervised, administrated the project, and granted the funding. All authors reviewed and approved the submitted version of the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-89765-5.
References
- 1.Center MM, Jemal A. International trends in liver cancer incidence rates. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prevent. 2011;20:2362–2368. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wong MC, et al. International incidence and mortality trends of liver cancer: A global profile. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:45846. doi: 10.1038/srep45846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Garcia-Jimenez C, et al. From obesity to diabetes and cancer: Epidemiological links and role of therapies. Br. J. Cancer. 2016;114:716–722. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lopez R, et al. Hyperglycemia enhances the proliferation of non-tumorigenic and malignant mammary epithelial cells through increased leptin/IGF1R signaling and activation of AKT/mTOR. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e79708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vasconcelos-Dos-Santos A, et al. Hyperglycemia exacerbates colon cancer malignancy through hexosamine biosynthetic pathway. Oncogenesis. 2017;6:e306. doi: 10.1038/oncsis.2017.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hosokawa T, et al. Hyperglycemia is a significant prognostic factor of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative therapy. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:249–257. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i2.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rahn S, et al. Diabetes as risk factor for pancreatic cancer: Hyperglycemia promotes epithelial-mesenchymal-transition and stem cell properties in pancreatic ductal epithelial cells. Cancer Lett. 2018;415:129–150. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zielinska HA, Holly JMP, Bahl A, Perks CM. Inhibition of FASN and ERalpha signalling during hyperglycaemia-induced matrix-specific EMT promotes breast cancer cell invasion via a caveolin-1-dependent mechanism. Cancer Lett. 2018;419:187–202. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wu J, et al. High glucose induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition and results in the migration and invasion of colorectal cancer cells. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018;16.:222–230. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Organ SL, Tsao MS. An overview of the c-MET signaling pathway. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2011;3:S7–S19. doi: 10.1177/1758834011422556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Garcia-Vilas JA, Medina MA. Updates on the hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met axis in hepatocellular carcinoma and its therapeutic implications. World J. Gastroenterol. 2018;24:3695–3708. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i33.3695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Topel H, et al. lncRNA HOTAIR overexpression induced downregulation of c-Met signaling promotes hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cell Commun. Signal. 2020;18:110. doi: 10.1186/s12964-020-00602-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ramesh V, Brabletz T, Ceppi P. Targeting EMT in cancer with repurposed metabolic inhibitors. Trends Cancer. 2020;6:942–950. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shaul YD, et al. Dihydropyrimidine accumulation is required for the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cell. 2014;158:1094–1109. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Campos C. Chronic hyperglycemia and glucose toxicity: Pathology and clinical sequelae. Postgrad. Med. 2012;124:90–97. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2012.11.2615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Valastyan S, Weinberg RA. Tumor metastasis: Molecular insights and evolving paradigms. Cell. 2011;147:275–292. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Iscan E, et al. The regulatory role of heparin on c-Met signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2017;11:155–166. doi: 10.1007/s12079-016-0368-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Korhan P, et al. Reciprocal activating crosstalk between c-Met and caveolin 1 promotes invasive phenotype in hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e105278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yilmaz Y, Gunes A, Topel H, Atabey N. Signaling pathways as potential therapeutic targets in hepatocarcinogenesis. J. Gastrointest. Cancer. 2017;48:225–237. doi: 10.1007/s12029-017-9958-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ozen E, et al. Heparin inhibits hepatocyte growth factor induced motility and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells through early growth response protein 1. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e42717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ho FM, et al. High glucose-induced apoptosis in human vascular endothelial cells is mediated through NF-kappaB and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase pathway and prevented by PI3K/Akt/eNOS pathway. Cell Signal. 2006;18:391–399. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Allen DA, Harwood S, Varagunam M, Raftery MJ, Yaqoob MM. High glucose-induced oxidative stress causes apoptosis in proximal tubular epithelial cells and is mediated by multiple caspases. Faseb J. 2003;17:908–910. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-0130fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16:284–287. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pinero, J. et al. DisGeNET: A discovery platform for the dynamical exploration of human diseases and their genes. Database (Oxford)2015, bav028, 10.1093/database/bav028 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Luo W, Brouwer C. Pathview: An R/Bioconductor package for pathway-based data integration and visualization. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1830–1831. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Huang X, Gan G, Wang X, Xu T, Xie W. The HGF-MET axis coordinates liver cancer metabolism and autophagy for chemotherapeutic resistance. Autophagy. 2019;15:1258–1279. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1580105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chandrashekar DS, et al. UALCAN: A portal for facilitating tumor subgroup gene expression and survival analyses. Neoplasia. 2017;19:649–658. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2017.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Amann T, et al. GLUT1 expression is increased in hepatocellular carcinoma and promotes tumorigenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 2009;174:1544–1552. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhou Y, Liu K, Liu Y, Tan L. MicroRNA-34a inhibit hepatocellular carcinoma progression by repressing hexokinase-1. J. Cell Biochem. 2018 doi: 10.1002/jcb.27988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Huang DQ, El-Serag HB, Loomba R. Global epidemiology of NAFLD-related HCC: Trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-00381-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Duan W, et al. Hyperglycemia, a neglected factor during cancer progression. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014;2014:461917. doi: 10.1155/2014/461917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ferretti AC, et al. Metformin and glucose starvation decrease the migratory ability of hepatocellular carcinoma cells: Targeting AMPK activation to control migration. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:2815. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39556-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schulte L, et al. Treatment with metformin is associated with a prolonged survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2019;39:714–726. doi: 10.1111/liv.14048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang H, et al. The function of the HGF/c-Met axis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:55. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mesarosova L, et al. High glucose induces HGF-independent activation of Met receptor in human renal tubular epithelium. J. Recept Signal Transduct. Res. 2017;37:535–542. doi: 10.1080/10799893.2017.1365902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jin N, et al. Identification of metabolic vulnerabilities of receptor tyrosine kinases-driven cancer. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2701. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10427-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mouchiroud L, Eichner LJ, Shaw RJ, Auwerx J. Transcriptional coregulators: Fine-tuning metabolism. Cell Metab. 2014;20:26–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Campbell SL, Wellen KE. Metabolic signaling to the nucleus in cancer. Mol. Cell. 2018;71:398–408. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gillies RJ, Gatenby RA. Adaptive landscapes and emergent phenotypes: Why do cancers have high glycolysis? J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2007;39:251–257. doi: 10.1007/s10863-007-9085-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ. Glycolysis in cancer: A potential target for therapy. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2007;39:1358–1366. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ. Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2004;4:891–899. doi: 10.1038/nrc1478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shiraishi T, et al. Glycolysis is the primary bioenergetic pathway for cell motility and cytoskeletal remodeling in human prostate and breast cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2015;6:130–143. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kumar D, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts drive glycolysis in a targetable signaling loop implicated in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma progression. Cancer Res. 2018;78:3769–3782. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Boschert, V. et al.The influence of met receptor level on HGF-induced glycolytic reprogramming in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21, 10.3390/ijms21020471 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 46.Cokakli M, et al. Differential expression of Caveolin-1 in hepatocellular carcinoma: Correlation with differentiation state, motility and invasion. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Schindelin J, et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gunes A, et al. Thioredoxin interacting protein promotes invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2018;9:36849–36866. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.26402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tang Z, et al. GEPIA: A web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:W98–W102. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Cerami E, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: An open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:401–404. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gao, J. et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci. Signal6, pl1, 10.1126/scisignal.2004088 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 52.Bagirsakci E, et al. Role of albumin in growth inhibition in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology. 2017;93:136–142. doi: 10.1159/000471807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.