Abstract
The magnetic MOF-based catalytic system has been reported here to be an efficient catalyst for synthesis of benzonitriles and diarylethers of aryl halides under optimal conditions. The MOF catalyst was built based on magnetic nanoparticles and UiO-66-NH2 which further modified with 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine and 5-phenyl tetrazole at the same time and the catalyst structure was confirmed by various techniques. This new modification has been applied to increase anchoring palladium into the support. Furthermore, the products’ yields were obtained in good to excellent for all reactions under mild conditions which result from superior activity of the synthesized heterogeneous catalyst containing palladium. Also, the magnetic property of the MOF-based catalyst makes it easy to separate from reaction mediums and reuse in the next runs.
Subject terms: Chemistry, Nanoscience and technology
Introduction
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), also called porous coordination polymers or porous coordination networks, are constructed from rigid multipodal organic linkers and inorganic nodes coordination bonds1. This very important class of hybrid materials has been utilized in diverse applications for heterogeneous catalysis2, adsorption/separation, gas storage, carbon dioxide capture3,4, chemical sensors5, and drug delivery6. It is well-known that a wide variety of MOF applications results from their unique properties, such as high amount of transition metals, adjustable and permanent porosity, ultrahigh surface area, active-site uniformity, and ability of post-synthetic modification7,8. In recent years, MOFs have been applied as sufficient catalysts for various organic reactions in different ways: (1) acting metal nodes and linkers as catalysts, (2) accepting guests with catalytic properties like metal nanoparticles7,9–15.
Besides of their advantages, low thermal stability of many MOFs makes them unsuitable candidates at high temperature in various applications especially in catalysis16. Zirconium-based MOFs (UiO-66-family), with Zr6 nodes and ligands such as 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (H2BDC) and 2-amino-1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (H2BDC-NH2), have been investigated in literatures extensively owing to their exceptional chemical stability and structural tunability17,18. Huang’s group prepared a Pd@UiO-66-NH2 catalyst for tandem oxidation-acetalization reaction. This bifunctional catalyst showed excellent catalytic activity and selectivity19. Tangestaninejad et al. designed a Pd@UiO-66-NH2 catalyst using a direct anionic exchange method and used it in Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction with excellent activity20. Gao et al. investigated catalytic performance of UiO-66-NH2 for knoevenagel condensation of a carbonyl group with the methylene group21. Jie et al. studied the application of amine-functionalized UiO-66 for Suzuki and Heck cross-coupling reactions, the amino group of Zr-based MOFs were postmodified with pyridine-2-carboxaldehyde to immobilize Pd nanoparticles22.
There have been many reports about functionalization of known MOFs by post-synthetic modification which offer excellent potentials through immobilization of transition metal nanoparticles for a variety of organic reactions23–25. The post-synthetic modification of amine-MOFs is widely applied to improve MOFs’ properties for catalytic applications. The amine-MOFs are functionalized easily to make high nitrogen-containing supports which prevent agglomeration and leaching transition metal nanoparticles such as palladium and platinum etc26.
On the other hand, nitriles are important category of materials in natural products, organic compounds, pesticides, and pharmaceuticals27. Because, nitriles serve as functional groups which can easily transform into corresponding amines, amides, ketones, aldehydes, and esters28. Among nitriles, benzonitriles are more attractive compounds which are useful precursors to versatile derivatives29. Moreover, diaryl ethers are another important class of organic compounds which are key intermediates for synthesis of pharmaceutical, agrochemical, and biochemical scaffolds30,31. One of their synthetic approaches is copper mediate reactions that need stoichiometric amounts of copper and suffer from remaining copper salts in the products31–33. Therefore, a number of magnetic supports have been used to immobilize transition-metals to solve mentioned restrictions34,35.
Inspired by above, we report here Pd-catalyzed cyanation and O-arylation methods which includes designing a magnetic modified UiO-66-NH2 as the catalyst support and Pd nanoparticles as the anchored transition-metal. The purpose of UiO-66-NH2 modification was preparing nitrogen-rich support by providing NNN pincer-like groups to immobilize Pd nanoparticles into it. This property accompanied by intrinsic porosity of UiO-66-NH2 led to high loading of Pd nanoparticles without significant leaching. Finally, the prepared catalyst allows benzonitriles and diaryl ethers formation from aryl halides under mild and simple conditions (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.
Catalytic activity of Pd0@ magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 complex for cyanation and O-arylation.
Results and discussion
Catalyst preparation
The magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2, a porous scaffold with large surface area, was synthesized to immobilize palladium nanoparticles. At first, the magnetic nanoparticles were functionalized by acrylic acid (AA) to prepare the surface for growth of UiO-66-NH2 (Fig. 2). Subsequently, the amino groups of MOF were modified by 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine (TCT) and 5-phenyl tetrazole which reacted with K2PdCl4 to provide an efficient heterogeneous catalyst (Fig. 3). Briefly, one chloride of TCT was substituted by amine groups of magnetic UiO-66-NH2 support. Then, the remaining two chlorides of TCT were substituted by amine groups of 5-phenyl tetrazole. It was expected, the 3D network structure was formed by substitution of all three chlorides in TCT which could effectively immobilized palladium ions into the resulting support by coordination with NNN pincer-like groups.
Figure 2.
Synthesis procedure of the magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 support.
Figure 3.
Immobilization of Pd(0) into the magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 support.
Characterization of Pd/MOF Catalyst
FT-IR spectroscopy
The characteristic absorption bands at 3440, 1093, and 576 cm−1 are related to O-H stretching vibration Si-O and Fe-O stretching vibration, and 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propylmethacrylate (MPS) sharp peaks can be seen at 1714 and 1408 cm−1 for C=O and C=C stretching bonds which confirms the Fe3O4 surface was coated successfully with MPS (Fig. 4)36. The PAA illustrates characteristic absorption bands at 2941, 1718, 1460, and 1411 cm−1 assigned to the CH2 stretching and bending modes, C=O and C–O stretching vibrations in COOH group, respectively37. The FT-IR spectrum of magnetic UiO-66 is shown the characteristic vibrational modes including 1573 cm−1 for COO− asymmetric mode, 1390 and 1433 cm−1 for COO− symmetric modes, 3361 cm−1 for NH2 symmetric mode, 3467 cm−1 for NH2 asymmetric mode, and 1259 cm−1 for C−N vibrational mode17. The magnetic UiO-66-NH2 was modified by TCT and 5-phenyl tetrazole at the same time and the strong characteristic band of triazine ring skeleton is observed at around 1570 cm−138 and 5-phenyl tetrazole ring show C=N and N=N stretching vibrations at 1450 and 1530 cm−139 which these bands overlap with the peaks of the magnetic UiO-66-NH2. The peak at 3435 cm−1 shows two branches related to stretching mode of NH2 groups which transformed to one broad peak related to NH groups after modification. Thus, it is a strong evidence for functionalization of the magnetic UiO-66-NH2.
Figure 4.
FT-IR spectra of (a) Fe3O4@SiO2, (b) Fe3O4@SiO2@MPS, (c) magnetic PAA, (d) magnetic UiO-66-NH2 support and (e) magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 support.
XRD patterns
XRD patterns of UiO-66-NH2, magnetic UiO-66-NH2, magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 and Pd0@ magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 are presented in Fig. 5. In the patterns, all diffraction peaks are similar to UiO-66 pattern which reported by Wang et al.16. These patterns confirm successful synthesis of UiO-66-NH2 and the peaks of Fe3O4 was not apparent in the patterns owing to applying low amount of Fe3O4 in this procedure. Therefore, the crystalline nature of the magnetic Zr-MOF is preserved after modification. In accordance with Fig. 5d, Pd0@ magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 shows the both peaks of UiO-66-NH2 and Pd nanoparticles confirming immobilization of Pd nanoparticles into the magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 support.
Figure 5.
XRD patterns of (a) UiO-66-NH2, (b) magnetic Ui66-NH2, (c) magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 and (d) Pd0@magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 catalyst.
Morphology analysis
The morphology of the magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 are presented in FE-SEM images (Fig. 6a, b). The FE-SEM images illustrate the particles have a mean diameter 125 nm with cubic structure which are similar to pervious works17. In addition, the magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 are uniform without aggregation. TEM images of the prepared MOF show good agreement with other literatures and can confirm the Fe3O4 core of the obtained UiO-66-NH2 (Fig. 6c–f).
Figure 6.
FE-SEM (a and b) and TEM (c–f) micrographs of magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 catalyst.
In addition, the FESEM (Fig. 7a) and TEM (Fig. 7b) images of Pd0@magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 catalyst are also provided. The size distribution of the catalyst was calculated based on its FESEM image and the mean particle size is around 135 nm (Fig. 7c).
Figure 7.
(a) FE-SEM and (b) TEM micrographs, (c) A histogram of Pd0@ magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 catalyst and (d) A FE-SEM micrograph of recycled Pd0@magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 catalyst.
The TEM images of Pd-catalyst have been shown in two magnifications 50 and 100 nm in which the presence of Pd nanoparticles into the polymeric network can be approved (Fig. 7b). The FESEM of recycled Pd0@magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 catalyst after six runs for cyanation reaction is presented in Fig. 7d and the small changes in the shape of recycled catalyst are observed. Also, the presence of Pd nanoparticles and other components are confirmed by Elemental mapping and EDX analysis (Fig. 8a, b).
Figure 8.
(a) Elemental mappings and (b) EDX of Pd0@ magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 catalyst.
Thermal properties
TGA analysis was performed under nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate 10 °C min−1 to investigate thermal decomposition of samples. It is noteworthy, samples were dried overnight in a vacuum oven at 80 °C before analysis. The thermograms of magnetic UiO-66-NH2 and magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 are demonstrated in Fig. 9. The first weight loss around 100 °C is related to degradation of water molecules trapping into MOF pores. Furthermore, the second is ascribed to decomposition of organic groups of samples such as H2BDC-NH2, TCT and 5-phenyl tetrazole. The difference between two curves shows the relative amounts of TCT and 5-phenyl tetrazole grafted to magnetic UiO-66-NH2 which is about 26% (w/w).
Figure 9.
Thermograms of (a) magnetic UiO-66-NH2 and (b) magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 support.
Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area analysis
The N2 adsorption–desorption data have been summarized in Table 1. The BET specific surface areas of magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 and Pd0@magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 are 828 and 664 m2 g−1, respectively. In accordance with results, the presence of Pd nanoparticles are confirmed by decreasing BET specific surface area, total pure volume, and mean pore diameter data of Pd0@magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 compared with magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH240–42.
Table 1.
N2 adsorption–desorption data.
| Samples | SBET (m2 g−1) | Total pure volume (cm3 g−1) | Mean pore diameter (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 | 828 | 0.41 | 5.1 |
| Pd0@magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 | 664 | 0.33 | 2.5 |
Cynation over Pd/MOF catalyst
The catalytic activity of the MOF-based catalyst was investigated through C–CN coupling reaction, after conformation of the catalyst structure with some techniques. To achieve optimal conditions, different reaction parameters were screened involving various amounts of catalyst, bases, and solvents by bromobenzene and K4Fe(CN)6 as a green cyanide source (Table 2). At first, bases including K2CO3, DABCO, KOH, KHCO3, and Et3N were tested in the presence of 2.0 mg of MOF based-catalyst and it was found that K2CO3 and KOH can facilitate the reaction among them but the KOH was the best base and chosen for the reaction (Table 2, entry 1–5). Subsequently, various solvents such as NMP, H2O, EtOH, DMSO, DMF, and Toluene were used and the effect of solvents was investigated on the reaction conversion (Table 2, entry 5–10). Based on solvent screening, polar aprotic solvents such as NMP and DMF were more effective rather than polar protic solvents such as H2O (Table 2, entry 6), and NMP was more favored solvent (Table 2, entry 5). Then, the reaction was performed with 1.0, 2.0, 5.0 mg of MOF based-catalyst and catalyst without Pd nanoparticles under the same reaction conditions and also the model reaction was tested in the presence of 2.0 mg of Pd0@magnetic UiO-66-NH2 and desired product was obtained in 62% yield (Table 2, entry 17) compared with Pd0@magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 (88% yield). It was found that 2.0 mg% of MOF based-catalyst was the best choice with 88% yield of desired product: aryl halide (1.0 mmol), potassium hexacyanoferrate(II) (0.2 mmol), MOF based-catalyst (2.0 mg) and KOH (1.2 mmol) in NMP at 100 °C (Table 2, entry 5). The turnover frequency (TOF) value of the catalyst was calculated 3.13 s−1 for this model reaction under optimazation conditions.
Table 2.
Variation of reaction conditions for the cyanation of bromobenzenea.
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Catalyst (mg) | Base | Solvent | Temp (°C) | Isolated yield (%) |
| 1 | 2 | K2CO3 | NMP | 100 | 77 |
| 2 | 2 | DABCO | NMP | 100 | Trace |
| 3 | 2 | KHCO3 | NMP | 100 | 27 |
| 4 | 2 | Et3N | NMP | 100 | 20 |
| 5b | 2 | KOH | NMP | 100 | 88 |
| 6 | 2 | KOH | H2O | 100 | 24 |
| 7 | 2 | KOH | EtOH | 100 | 29 |
| 8 | 2 | KOH | DMSO | 100 | 68 |
| 9 | 2 | KOH | DMF | 100 | 83 |
| 10 | 2 | KOH | Toluene | 100 | 41 |
| 11 | 1 | KOH | NMP | 100 | 66 |
| 12 | 5 | KOH | NMP | 100 | 89 |
| 13 | 2 | KOH | NMP | 80 | 76 |
| 14 | 2 | KOH | NMP | R.T | 35 |
| 15 | 2 mg of Cat. without Pd | KOH | NMP | 100 | 22 |
| 16 | – | KOH | NMP | 100 | Trace |
| 17 | 2 mg of Pd0@ magnetic UiO-66-NH2 | KOH | NMP | 100 | 62 |
aBromobenzene (1.0 mmol), Potassium hexacyanoferrate(II) (0.2 mmol), Base (1.2 mmol), Solvent (2.0 ml) and MOF-based catalyst.
b Optimal parameters.
With having the best reaction parameters in hand, the applicability of the reported protocol was studied for versatile aryl halides bearing both electron-deficient and electron-rich functional groups to provide target products with good to excellent yields. The aryl halides were reacted with K4Fe(CN)6 in the presence of KOH and 2.0 mg of MOF based-catalyst and NMP under 100 °C as optimal conditions as presented in Table 3. Generally, aryl iodides and aryl bromides with electron-deficient groups such as nitro groups in meta and para positions have shown excellent yields (Table 3, entry 7 and 16) and less yields were seen in products having electron-rich groups such as methyl groups (Table 3, entry 5 and 12). Also, in this case aryl chlorides have demonstrated good yields of benzonitriles which their reactions proceed with longer times. The aryl chloride bearing electron-deficient (Table 3, entry 21–23) have shown higher yields in comparison to electon-rich aryl chloride and they need higher temperature and longer reaction time to provide desired yield (Table 3, entry 24).
Table 3.
Cyanation of various aryl halides.
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Arylhalide | Temp (°C)/ Time (h) | Product | Isolated yield (%) |
| 1 |
|
100/2 |
|
92 |
| 2 |
|
100/2 |
|
94 |
| 3 |
|
100/2 |
|
96 |
| 4 |
|
100/4 |
|
89 |
| 5 |
|
100/4 |
|
87 |
| 6 |
|
100/1 |
|
96 |
| 7 |
|
100/1 |
|
98 |
| 8 |
|
100/2 |
|
93 |
| 9 |
|
100/5 |
|
88 |
| 10 |
|
100/6 |
|
83 |
| 11 |
|
100/6 |
|
81 |
| 12 |
|
100/6 |
|
80 |
| 13 |
|
120/5 |
|
81 |
| 14 |
|
110/5 |
|
79 |
| 15 |
|
100/3 |
|
90 |
| 16 |
|
100/3 |
|
91 |
| 17 |
|
100/3 |
|
90 |
| 18 |
|
100/3 |
|
94 |
| 19 |
|
100/3 |
|
91 |
| 20 |
|
110/7 |
|
73 |
| 21 |
|
100/6 |
|
84 |
| 22 |
|
100/6 |
|
88 |
| 23 |
|
100/6 |
|
88 |
| 24 |
|
120/7 |
|
60 |
Aryl halide (1.0 mmol), Potassium hexacyanoferrate(II) (0.2 mmol), Potassium hydroxide (1.2 mmol), NMP (2.0 ml) and MOF-based catalyst (2.0 mg).
Then, the heterocyclic compounds including 2- and 4-bromopyridine were examined and the 2- cyanopyridine (94%) and 4-cyanopyridine (91%) were obtained in excellent yields (Table 3, entry 18 and 19).
The chemoselectivity of this protocol was tested by 1-chloro-2-iodobenzene and 1-chloro-4-iodobenzene which they converted to 2-chlorobenzonitrile and 4-chlorobenzonitrile with excellent yields, 94% and 96%, respectively (Table 3, entry 2 and 3). Moreover,1-bromo-4-iodobenzene and 1-bromo-4-chlorobenzene provided 4-bromobenzonitrile and 4-chlorobenzonitrile, 93% and 90%, respectively (Table 3, entry 8 and 17). Therefore, the reactions indicated excellent chemoselectivity which occurred at iodine and bromine positions as better leaving groups (See Supplementary information for 1H and 13C NMR spectral data).
O-arylation over Pd/MOF catalyst
In the following, the catalytic activity of the MOF based-catalyst has been investigated for O-arylation of phenols. The reaction conditions have been optimized for the phenol and bromobenzene as partner substrates and the data is summarized in Table 4. In accordance with Table 4, various bases such as K2CO3, K3PO4, KOH, NaHCO3, and Et3N were applied and the KOH was the best base (Table 4, entry 1–5). In the next step, solvents were screened and DMSO and H2O were the optimal solvents rather than DMF, NMP, CH3CN, and Toluene (Table 4, entry 3 and entry 6–10). But water was chosen as the optimal solvent because of its green nature. Afterwards, the reaction was tested at room temperature, 80 °C and 120 °C (Table 4, entry 11–13). When the reaction took place at 80 °C instead of 100 °C, the desired product was acquired without remarkable change in the yield. To optimize amounts of the catalyst, different amounts of the MOF based-catalyst was used (1.0, 2.0, 5.0 mg, and none) and catalyst without Pd nanoparticles which the 2.0 mg of the catalyst was gave the best yield and use of 5.0 mg of the catalyst showed no significant effect on the yield (Table 4, entry 14–17). Also, the model reaction was tested in the presence of 2.0 mg of Pd0@magnetic UiO-66-NH2 and desired product was obtained in 67% yield (Table 4, entry 18) compared with Pd0@magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 (92% yield). Finally, the optimal conditions were obtained as follows: aryl halide (1.0 mmol), phenol (1.0 mmol), MOF based-catalyst (2.0 mg), KOH (1.2 mmol) in H2O at 80 °C (Table 4, entry 11). The TOF value of the catalyst was calculated 5.46 s−1 for this model reaction under optimazation conditions.
Table 4.
Optimization condition for Nano Pd0@magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 catalyst on C–O bond formationa.
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Catalyst (mg) | Base | Solvent | Temperature (°C) | Isolated yield (%) |
| 1 | 2 | K2CO3 | DMSO | 100 | 88 |
| 2 | 2 | K3PO4 | DMSO | 100 | 86 |
| 3 | 2 | KOH | DMSO | 100 | 93 |
| 4 | 2 | NaHCO3 | DMSO | 100 | 73 |
| 5 | 2 | NEt3 | DMSO | 100 | 54 |
| 6 | 2 | KOH | DMF | 100 | 81 |
| 7 | 2 | KOH | NMP | 100 | 73 |
| 8 | 2 | KOH | CH3CN | 100 | 77 |
| 9 | 2 | KOH | H2O | 100 | 93 |
| 10 | 2 | KOH | Toluene | 100 | 47 |
| 11b | 2 | KOH | H2O | 80 | 92 |
| 12 | 2 | KOH | H2O | 120 | 93 |
| 13 | 2 | KOH | H2O | R.T | 25 |
| 14 | 5 | KOH | H2O | 80 | 92 |
| 15 | 1 | KOH | H2O | 80 | 79 |
| 16 | 2 mg of Cat. without Pd | KOH | H2O | 80 | 28 |
| 17 | – | KOH | H2O | 80 | Trace |
| 18 | 2 mg of Pd0@ magnetic UiO-66-NH2 | KOH | H2O | 80 | 67 |
aBromobenzene(1.0 mmol), Phenol (1.0 mmol), Base (1.2 mmol), Solvent (2.0 ml) and MOF-based catalyst.
b Optimal parameters
With optimal conditions in hand, we have synthesized a number of diaryl ether derivatives with phenol (1.0 mmol) and aryl halide (1.0 mmol) under the MOF based-catalyst (2.0 mg) and KOH (1.2 mmol) in H2O at 80 °C (Table 5). To gain different O-arylated derivatives, several electron-rich and electron-deficient substrates were tested. Firstly, the scope of aryl halides was studied and Iodobenzene and bromobenzene illustrated higher activity in comparison with chlorobenzene because of lower polarizability of C–Cl bond related to oxidation-addition step of palladium insertion in reaction mechanism (Table 5). Subsequently, the electron-rich aryl halides such as methyl and methoxy groups on them showed good yields and electron-deficient aryl halides showed higher yields. In the next step, phenols were examined and electron-rich phenols with methyl and methoxy groups were provided diaryl ethers in excellent yields and electron-deficient phenols having nitro groups depicted lower yields because of decreasing the nucleophilicity of phenols. In the case of 2-nitrophenol which has greater steric hindrance compared with 4-nitrophenol, it was provided the expected products but in low yields. Also, 1-naphthol and 2-naphthol were tested and they generated the desired products in good yields under longer reaction times (See Supplementary information for 1H and 13C NMR spectral data).
Table 5.
Reaction scope of nano Pd0@magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 catalyst on diarylether formationa.
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
||||
| X = I | Yield = 95% | ||||||
| X = Br | Yield = 92% | X = Br | Yield = 91% | X = Br | Yield = 89% | X = Br | Yield = 88% |
| X = Cl | Yield = 84% | ||||||
|
|
|
|
||||
| X = I | Yield = 97% | ||||||
| X = Br | Yield = 86% | X = Br | Yield = 80% | X = Br | Yield = 90% | X = Br | Yield = 94% |
| X = Cl | Yield = 89% | ||||||
|
|
|
|
||||
| X = I | Yield = 95% | ||||||
| X = Br | Yield = 91% | X = Br | Yield = 93% | X = Br | Yield = 90% | X = Br | Yield = 91% |
| X = Cl | Yield = 87% | ||||||
|
|
|
|
||||
| X = I | Yield = 93% | X = I | Yield = 77% | X = I | Yield = 93% | X = I | Yield = 94% |
| X = Br | Yield = 90% | X = Br | Yield = 73% | X = Br | Yield = 89% | X = Br | Yield = 89% |
| X = Cl | Yield = 87% | X = Cl | Yield = 21% | X = Cl | Yield = 81% | X = Cl | Yield = 80% |
aAryl halide (1.0 mmol), Phenol (1.0 mmol), Potassium hydroxide (1.2 mmol), H2O(2.0 ml) and MOF-based catalyst (2.0 mg).
Catalyst recycling
The reuseability of the catalyst was examined through optimized reaction conditions between iodobenzene and K4Fe(CN)6 as model raw materials. After each run, the catalyst was collected by an external magnetic field and the isolated catalyst was washed with methanol and water, dried completely, and applied for next run. This MOF-based catalyst was used over six successive runs and the isolated yields were shown in Table 6. The results confirm that this catalytic system remained still active during six runs of cyanation reaction without loss of catalytic activity. Also, the recycleability of the catalyst was tested for synthesis of diaryl ethers between iodobenzene and phenol as model reaction and the catalyst was reused over five successive runs based on the mentioned procedure (Table 7). After final runs, the loading amounts of Pd were investigated by ICP-OES analysis and they were 0.72 mmol g−1 for Cyanation and 0.71 for O-arylation.
Table 6.
The recyclability of the Pd0@magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 in the synthesis of benzonitriles under optimal condition.
| Run | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield% | 92 | 91 | 91 | 90 | 88 | 83 |
Table 7.
The recyclability of the Pd0@magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 in the synthesis of diaryl ethers under optimal condition.
| Run | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield% | 95 | 95 | 93 | 91 | 88 |
Conclusion
In summary, the presented article described the preparation and application of the palladium MOF-based catalyst. The magnetic catalyst includes UiO-66-NH2 which has been modified with 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine and 5-phenyl tetrazole to support palladium nanoparticles. The shape and morphology of the modified UiO-66-NH2 was confirmed by FESEM and TEM analysis and they corresponded with pervious literatures. This catalytic system has shown very efficient activity for both syntheses of cyanoarenes and diaryl ethers in mild reaction conditions with good to excellent yields.
Experimental section
Catalyst preparation
Preparation of the magnetic nanoparticles
Immobilization of acrylic acid on Fe3O4@SiO2 Microspheres
Firstly, the Fe3O4@SiO2 nanoparticles were prepared through co-precipitation method and treated with 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propylmethacrylate (MPS) as reported in previous works43. Afterwards, the surface of Fe3O4@SiO2@MPS was functionalized with acrylic acid (AA): 3.0 ml of acrylic acid was added to 0.50 g of Fe3O4@SiO2@MPS in 20 ml deionized water. Then, the flask was charged with 10 mg of AIBN after degassed under N2 atmosphere and refluxed for 24h. Then, the obtained magnetite nanoparticles were collected by an external magnet and washed with deionized water/methanol three times, and dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 12h to provide the magnetic PAAs.
Preparation of the magnetic UiO-66-NH2
The magnetic UiO-66-NH2 was synthesized based on literature reported by Wang et al.16. In a round bottom flask, 0.2 g of the magnetic PAAs with ZrCl4 (2.27 mmol): H2BDC-NH2 (2.27 mmol): DMF (405.38 mmol) ratio were mixed and put in an autoclave at 120 °C for 24 h. The magnetic amine-functionalized UiO-66 was immersed in chloroform for few days, filtered and dried in a vacuum at 160 °C for 48 h.
Preparation of the Pd0@ magnetic amine-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2
A round bottom flask was charged by the magnetic UiO-66-NH2 (1.0 g) and dry THF (20 ml). Then, 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine (TCT: 10 mmol) at 0 °C with stirring bar for 7 h. Afterwards, the 14 mmol of K2CO3 and 5-phenyl tetrazole (20 mmol) was added to flask and stirred at room temperature. After 4h, the flask was equipped with condenser and refluxed at 50 °C for 24h. the final solid sample was separated and washed with water/methanol three times and dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 12 h. In the end, the 0.2 g of final support was added to the saturated K2PdCl4 solution and stirred at room temperature for 24 h and then, Pd (II) was reduced to Pd (0) with aim of NaBH4 (15 mg). The Pd-catalyst was separated easily by an external magnet, washed with water/methanol three times and dried under reduced pressure. Based on ICP-OES analysis, the loading of Pd0 was found 0.78 mmol g−1 for fresh catalyst.
Preparation of the Pd0@ UiO-66-NH2
A round bottom flask was charged by the magnetic UiO-66-NH2 (0.2 g) and saturated K2PdCl4 solution and then stirred at room temperature for 24 h. In the end, Pd (II) was reduced to Pd (0) with aim of NaBH4 (15 mg). The Pd0@UiO-66-NH2 was separated easily by an external magnet, washed with water/methanol three times and dried under reduced pressure. Based on ICP-OES analysis, the loading of Pd0 was found 0.51 mmol g−1 for fresh catalyst.
Catalytic performance for cyanation
The experiments were performed in a vessel containing aryl halide (1.0 mmol), potassium hexacyanoferrate(II) (0.2 mmol), potassium hydroxide (1.2 mmol), NMP (2.0 ml) and MOF-based catalyst (2.0 mol). The vessel was equipped with stirrer bar and temperature was increased from room temperature to 100 °C slowly. The reaction was monitored until completed (TLC, EtOAc: n-hexane, 1:5). Then, the mixture was diluted by EtOAc and water. The organic phase was with brine and dried with Na2SO4. The organic layers were mixed, purified by column chromatography, and confirmed by 1HNMR and 13CNMR.
Catalytic performance for O-arylation
The experiments were performed in a vessel containing aryl halide (1.0 mmol), phenol (1.0 mmol), potassium hydroxide (1.2 mmol), H2O (2.0 ml) and MOF-based catalyst (2.0 mol). The vessel was equipped with stirrer bar and temperature was increased from room temperature to 80 °C slowly. The reaction was monitored until completed (TLC, EtOAc: n-hexane, 1:10). Then, the mixture was diluted by EtOAc and water. The organic phase was with brine and dried with Na2SO4. The organic layers were mixed, purified by column chromatography, and confirmed by 1HNMR and 13CNMR.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Research Affairs Division sharif University of Technology (SUT), Islamic Republic of Iran and we acknowledge its support.
Author contributions
F.M.M. is a professor in organic chemistry at SUT. He devised the project and the main conceptual ideas and was in charge of overall direction and planning. A.J. is a Ph.D candidate in organic chemistry at SUT. She performed the experiments, analyzed spectra, and wrote the original draft. M.H.H. is a MSc student. He contributed to perform experiments. A.P. is a professor in organic chemistry at SUT and he also supervised the project. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-90478-y.
References
- 1.Zhao S-N, Wang G, Poelman D, Van Der Voort P. Metal organic frameworks based materials for heterogeneous photocatalysis. Molecules. 2018;23(11):2947. doi: 10.3390/molecules23112947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chen G-J, Ma H-C, Xin W-L, Li X-B, Jin F-Z, Wang J-S, Liu M-Y, Dong Y-B. Dual heterogeneous catalyst Pd–Au@ Mn (II)-MOF for one-pot tandem synthesis of imines from alcohols and amines. Inorg. Chem. 2017;56(1):654–660. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rowsell JL, Millward AR, Park KS, Yaghi OM. Hydrogen sorption in functionalized metal−organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126(18):5666–5667. doi: 10.1021/ja049408c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Couck S, Denayer JF, Baron GV, Rémy T, Gascon J, Kapteijn F. An amine-functionalized MIL-53 metal−organic framework with large separation power for CO2 and CH4. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131(18):6326–6327. doi: 10.1021/ja900555r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li X, Van Zeeland R, Maligal-Ganesh RV, Pei Y, Power G, Stanley L, Huang W. Impact of linker engineering on the catalytic activity of metal–organic frameworks containing Pd (II)–bipyridine complexes. ACS Catal. 2016;6(9):6324–6328. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b01753. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.He C, Liu D, Lin W. Nanomedicine applications of hybrid nanomaterials built from metal–ligand coordination bonds: nanoscale metal–organic frameworks and nanoscale coordination polymers. Chem. Rev. 2015;115(19):11079–11108. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dhakshinamoorthy A, Li Z, Garcia H. Catalysis and photocatalysis by metal organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018;47(22):8134–8172. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00256H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Feng X, Jena HS, Leus K, Wang G, Ouwehand J, Van Der Voort P. l-proline modulated zirconium metal organic frameworks: Simple chiral catalysts for the aldol addition reaction. J. Catal. 2018;365:36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.06.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yang Q, Xu Q, Jiang H-L. Metal–organic frameworks meet metal nanoparticles: synergistic effect for enhanced catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017;46(15):4774–4808. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00724D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li L, Li Z, Yang W, Huang Y, Huang G, Guan Q, Dong Y, Lu J, Yu S-H, Jiang H-L. Integration of Pd nanoparticles with engineered pore walls in MOFs for enhanced catalysis. Chem. 2021;7(3):686–698. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.11.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen D, Yang W, Jiao L, Li L, Yu SH, Jiang HL. Boosting catalysis of Pd nanoparticles in MOFs by pore wall engineering: the roles of electron transfer and adsorption energy. Adv. Mater. 2020;32(30):2000041. doi: 10.1002/adma.202000041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lu G, Li S, Guo Z, Farha OK, Hauser BG, Qi X, Wang Y, Wang X, Han S, Liu X. Imparting functionality to a metal–organic framework material by controlled nanoparticle encapsulation. Nat. Chem. 2012;4(4):310–316. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liu H, Chang L, Bai C, Chen L, Luque R, Li Y. Controllable encapsulation of “clean” metal clusters within MOFs through kinetic modulation: towards advanced heterogeneous nanocatalysts. Angewandte. 2016;55(16):5019–5023. doi: 10.1002/anie.201511009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chen Y-Z, Gu B, Uchida T, Liu J, Liu X, Ye B-J, Xu Q, Jiang H-L. Location determination of metal nanoparticles relative to a metal–organic framework. Nat. Commun. 2019;10(1):1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07882-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Choi KM, Na K, Somorjai GA, Yaghi OM. Chemical environment control and enhanced catalytic performance of platinum nanoparticles embedded in nanocrystalline metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137(24):7810–7816. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b03540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Abid HR, Tian H, Ang H-M, Tade MO, Buckley CE, Wang S. Nanosize Zr-metal organic framework (UiO-66) for hydrogen and carbon dioxide storage. Chem. Eng. J. 2012;187:415–420. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lee DT, Zhao J, Oldham CJ, Peterson GW, Parsons GN. UiO-66-NH2 metal–organic framework (MOF) nucleation on TiO2, ZnO, and Al2O3 atomic layer deposition-treated polymer fibers: role of metal oxide on MOF growth and catalytic hydrolysis of chemical warfare agent simulants. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9(51):44847–44855. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b15397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen Z, Islamoglu T, Farha OK. Toward base heterogenization: a zirconium metal–organic framework/dendrimer or polymer mixture for rapid hydrolysis of a nerve-agent simulant. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019;2(2):1005–1008. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.8b02292. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Li X, Guo Z, Xiao C, Goh TW, Tesfagaber D, Huang W. Tandem catalysis by palladium nanoclusters encapsulated in metal–organic frameworks. ACS Catal. 2014;4(10):3490–3497. doi: 10.1021/cs5006635. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kardanpour R, Tangestaninejad S, Mirkhani V, Moghadam M, Mohammadpoor-Baltork I, Khosropour AR, Zadehahmadi F. Highly dispersed palladium nanoparticles supported on amino functionalized metal–organic frameworks as an efficient and reusable catalyst for Suzuki cross-coupling reaction. J. Organomet. Chem. 2014;761:127–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2014.03.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yang Y, Yao H-F, Xi F-G, Gao E-Q. Amino-functionalized Zr (IV) metal–organic framework as bifunctional acid–base catalyst for Knoevenagel condensation. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2014;390:198–205. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2014.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sun R, Liu B, Li BG, Jie S. Palladium (II)@ zirconium-based mixed-linker metal–organic frameworks as highly efficient and recyclable catalysts for Suzuki and Heck cross-coupling reactions. ChemCatChem. 2016;8(20):3261–3271. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201600774. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Xiong G, Chen X-L, You L-X, Ren B-Y, Ding F, Dragutan I, Dragutan V, Sun Y-G. La-metal–organic framework incorporating Fe3O4 nanoparticles, post-synthetically modified with Schiff base and Pd. A highly active, magnetically recoverable, recyclable catalyst for CC cross-couplings at low Pd loadings. J. Catal. 2018;361:116–125. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.02.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Qin Y, Wang B, Li J, Wu X, Chen L. Cobalt imine–pyridine–carbonyl complex functionalized metal–organic frameworks as catalysts for alkene epoxidation. Transit. Met. Chem. 2019;44(7):595–602. doi: 10.1007/s11243-019-00319-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hamzah HA, Gee WJ, Raithby PR, Teat SJ, Mahon MF, Burrows AD. Post-synthetic mannich chemistry on metal–organic frameworks: system-specific reactivity and functionality-triggered dissolution. Chemistry. 2018;24(43):11094. doi: 10.1002/chem.201801419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chen J, Liu R, Guo Y, Chen L, Gao H. Selective hydrogenation of biomass-based 5-hydroxymethylfurfural over catalyst of palladium immobilized on amine-functionalized metal–organic frameworks. ACS Catal. 2015;5(2):722–733. doi: 10.1021/cs5012926. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen H, Sun S, Liu YA, Liao X. Nickel-catalyzed cyanation of aryl halides and hydrocyanation of alkynes via C–CN bond cleavage and cyano transfer. ACS Catal. 2019;10(2):1397–2140. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b04586. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ueda Y, Tsujimoto N, Yurino T, Tsurugi H, Mashima K. Nickel-catalyzed cyanation of aryl halides and triflates using acetonitrile via C–CN bond cleavage assisted by 1, 4-bis (trimethylsilyl)-2, 3, 5, 6-tetramethyl-1, 4-dihydropyrazine. Chem. Sci. 2019;10(4):994–999. doi: 10.1039/C8SC04437F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Anbarasan P, Schareina T, Beller M. Recent developments and perspectives in palladium-catalyzed cyanation of aryl halides: synthesis of benzonitriles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40(10):5049–5067. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15004a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Damkaci F, Sigindere C, Sobiech T, Vik E, Malone J. N-Picolinamides as ligands in Ullman type C–O coupling reactions. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017;58(36):3559–3564. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2017.07.099. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Giri R, Brusoe A, Troshin K, Wang JY, Font M, Hartwig JF. Mechanism of the Ullmann biaryl ether synthesis catalyzed by complexes of anionic ligands: evidence for the reaction of iodoarenes with ligated anionic CuI intermediates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140(2):793–806. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b11853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ren Y, Wang W, Zhao S, Tian X, Wang J, Yin W, Cheng L. Microwave-enhanced and ligand-free copper-catalyzed cyanation of aryl halides with K4[Fe (CN)6] in water. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50(32):4595–4597. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.05.073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ren Y, Liu Z, Zhao S, Tian X, Wang J, Yin W, He S. Ethylenediamine/Cu(OAc)2· H2O-catalyzed cyanation of aryl halides with K4 [Fe(CN)6] Catal. Commun. 2009;10(6):768–771. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2008.11.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gholinejad M, Aminianfar A. Palladium nanoparticles supported on magnetic copper ferrite nanoparticles: the synergistic effect of palladium and copper for cyanation of aryl halides with K4 [Fe (CN) 6] J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2015;397:106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2014.10.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pourjavadi A, Keshavarzi N, Hosseini SH, Moghaddam FM. Gold-Decorated 3D 2, 6-diaminopyridine network: a robust catalyst for the bromination of aromatic compounds. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018;57(37):12314–12322. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b01179. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Moghaddam FM, Ayati SE, Firouzi HR, Hosseini SH, Pourjavadi A. Gold nanoparticles anchored onto the magnetic poly (ionic-liquid) polymer as robust and recoverable catalyst for reduction of Nitroarenes. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2017;31(12):e3825. doi: 10.1002/aoc.3825. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ju Q, Luo W, Liu Y, Zhu H, Li R, Chen X. Poly (acrylic acid)-capped lanthanide-doped BaFCl nanocrystals: synthesis and optical properties. Nanoscale. 2010;2(7):1208–1212. doi: 10.1039/c0nr00116c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xin F, Guo C, Chen Y, Zhang H, Qian L. A novel triazine-rich polymer wrapped MMT: synthesis, characterization and its application in flame-retardant poly (butylene terephthalate) RSC Adv. 2017;7(75):47324–47331. doi: 10.1039/C7RA08857D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Moghaddam FM, Saberi V, Kalvani P. Phenyltetrazole as a new ligand for immobilization of palladium nanoparticles on SBA-15: a new robust catalyst with high loading of Pd for rapid oxidation and reduction. Chem. Sel. 2018;3(24):6779–6785. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ahmadipouya S, Haris MH, Ahmadijokani F, Jarahiyan A, Molavi H, Moghaddam FM, Rezakazemi M, Arjmand M. Magnetic Fe3O4@ UiO-66 nanocomposite for rapid adsorption of organic dyes from aqueous solution. J. Mol. Liq. 2021;322:114910. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.114910. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Min X, Yang W, Hui Y-F, Gao C-Y, Dang S, Sun Z-M. Fe3O4@ ZIF-8: a magnetic nanocomposite for highly efficient UO22+ adsorption and selective UO22+/Ln3+ separation. Chem. Commun. 2017;53(30):4199–4202. doi: 10.1039/C6CC10274C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhao H-X, Zou Q, Sun S-K, Yu C, Zhang X, Li R-J, Fu Y-Y. Theranostic metal–organic framework core–shell composites for magnetic resonance imaging and drug delivery. Chem. Sci. 2016;7(8):5294–5301. doi: 10.1039/C6SC01359G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Moghaddam FM, Jarahiyan A, Eslami M, Pourjavadi A. A novel magnetic polyacrylonotrile-based palladium core−shell complex: a highly efficient catalyst for Synthesis of Diaryl ethers. J. Organomet. Chem. 2020;916:121266. doi: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2020.121266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.