Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
. 2021 May 15;14(5):653–661.

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor of the pancreas: case report and literature review

Chong Geng 1, Zhimin Cao 2, Brian Bacacao 3, Zhixin Cao 4
PMCID: PMC8167487  PMID: 34093951

Abstract

Neoplasms with perivascular epithelioid cell differentiation (PEComas) of the pancreas are rare, and only 22 cases have been reported globally. Therefore, clinician and pathologist knowledge of this tumor’s biologic behavior and molecular genetics has been limited. A 40-year-old female patient presented with a space-occupying mass in the pancreas found by abdominal B-mode ultrasonography upon physical examination. Laparoscopic resection of the pancreatic body and tail was performed, and a cystic-solid tumor of about 2 × 2 cm was identified. PEComa is a type of mesenchymal tumor with uncertain biologic behavior, more frequently found in females. PEComa features a unique histomorphology and immunophenotype. We summarize the characteristics and research progress of the pancreatic PEComa, which will be convenient for physicians and pathologists to fully understand the disease to avoid misdiagnosis and to provide a reference for treatment and prognosis.

Keywords: Pancreas, perivascular epithelioid cell tumor, pathologic diagnosis

Introduction

A neoplasm with perivascular epithelioid cell differentiation (PEComa) arising in pancreas is extremely rare. Zamboni et al. [1] reported the first case of clear cell sugar tumor of the pancreas and proposed the concept of perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa). 2016 WHO (World Health Organization) Classification of Soft Tissue Tumors defined PEComa as a mesenchymal tumor composed of distinctive cells that show a focal association with blood vessel walls and usually express melanocytic and smooth-muscle markers. However, only 22 cases have been reported in the English and Chinese literature to date [1-22]. Herein, we report one case of PEComa in the pancreas and review the literature to discuss the clinicopathologic features of PEComa in the pancreas.

Case presentation

A 40-year-old female patient was found to have a mass in the pancreas by abdominal B-mode ultrasonography during physical examination. She reported no abdominal pain or distension, nausea, or vomiting symptoms. Abdominal CT scan revealed a circular isodense shadow in the pancreatic body with rich blood supply and mild protrusion. Contrast-enhanced CT scan revealed moderately progressive enhancement, and solid pseudopapillary tumor was suspected (Figure 1). Laboratory data were as follows: prealbumin: 93.69 mg/L (reference range: 280-360 mg/L), total protein: 56.1 g/L (reference range: 60~80 g/L), albumin: 34.4 g/L (reference range: 35-51 g/L), and with normal liver and kidney function tests. After admission, a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) procedure was ultimately performed on the patient. In the pancreatic body, a cystic-solid tumor of about 2 × 2 cm was found during surgery. The tumor had penetrated the connective tissue membrane of the pancreatic surface. It was expansile and had a relatively clear boundary with the normal pancreatic tissues.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

CT revealed a circular isodense shadow in the pancreatic body with rich blood supply and mild protrusion. Contrast-enhanced CT scan revealed moderately progressive enhancement and solid pseudopapillary tumor was suspected. A. CT scan showed an isodense shadow. B. Arterial phase showed the tumor density was lower than that of the pancreatic parenchyma. C. Venous phase. D. The delayed phase showed that the tumor density was almost equivalent to the pancreas density. (Red arrow).

The submitted tissue sample was fixed in 4% neutral formaldehyde, paraffin-embedded, sectioned, and subjected to Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining. The EnVision system was used for immunohistochemical staining. The antibodies against cytokeratin, vimentin, HMB-45, MelanA, SMA, desmin, CD117, S-100, synaptophysin, Ki-67, and TFE-3 were purchased from Fuzhou Maixin Biotechnology Development Co., Ltd. The vimentin antibody was a rat anti-pig monoclonal antibody, and the remaining antibodies were rat anti-human monoclonal antibody. To detect glycogen, the tissues were digested and stained with PAS.

There was a well-demarcated tumor in the pancreatic body of the tissue sample of 13 cm × 4 cm × 3.5 cm in size. The cross-sectional area was 2.3 cm × 2.0 cm, with a cystic-solid nature. The solid components were grayish-white and of a brittle texture; the cystic components contained a small amount of bloody fluid. The inner wall was mildly rough (Figure 2). The tumor had a clear boundary with the surrounding pancreatic tissues (Figure 3A). The tumor cells were in a patchy distribution and uniformly were epithelioid or fusiform in morphology (Figure 3B). The cells were large, circular, or polygonal, and contained a rich cytoplasm and a large amount of transparent or eosinophilic cytoplasm (Figure 3C). The tumor cells had round or oval nuclei with nucleoli and intranuclear pseudo-inclusions (Figure 3D). HMB-45 (Figure 4A), MelanA (Figure 4B), and SMA (Figure 4C) were all positive. The positive rate of Ki-67 was 5% (Figure 4D). CK, desmin, CD117, S-100, Syn, vimentin (Figure 4E), and TFE-3 (Figure 4F) were all negative. The tissues were positive for PAS staining (Figure 4G) and could be digested by amylase (Figure 4H).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Gross observation of the tumor. There was a cystic-solid tumor in the pancreatic body with clear boundary, which had a cross-sectional area of 2.3 cm × 2.0 cm. The solid components were grayish white and of a brittle texture, the cystic components contained a small amount of bloody fluid, and the inner wall was mildly rough. The upper right is magnification of the tumor.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Microscopy of PEComa with H&E. The tumor had a clear boundary with the surrounding pancreatic tissues (A, H&E × 20). The tumor cells were in a patchy distribution and uniformly epithelioid or fusiform in morphology (B, H&E × 400). The cells were large in size, which were of a circular or polygonal shape and contained rich cytoplasm and a large amount of transparent or eosinophilic cytoplasm (C, green arrow, H&E × 200). The tumor cells had round or oval nuclei with nucleoli and intranuclear pseudo-inclusions (D, green arrow, H&E × 400). Mitosis was rare.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Immunohistochemistry and special staining of the tumor tissues. HMB-45 (A), MelanA (B), SMA (C) were all positive. The Ki-67 index was 5% (D). CK, desmin, Both vimentin and TFE3 were negative (E and F). The tumor cells were positive for PAS staining (G) and could be digested by amylase (H). × 400 magnifications.

Pathologic diagnosis: PEComa in the pancreatic body

Postoperatively, the patient had no surgical incision infection, no pancreatic leakage, delayed gastric emptying, and fat malabsorption. The patient was discharged on the 9th day after surgery. 30 months after the operation, the patient had no discomfort and no tumor recurrence.

Discussion

PEComa is characterized by differentiation of the perivascular epithelioid cells arranged in a radial pattern around the blood vessels and specifically expresses melanophore markers and smooth-muscle cell markers. The PEComa family includes angiomyolipoma (AML), clear cell sugar tumor (CCST), lymphangioleiomyoma (LAM), and a group of tumors originating from the soft tissues and organs with similar histology and immunophenotype. Except for AML, CCST, and LAM, other PECcomas are named non-specific PEComa (PEComa-not otherwise specified, PEComa-NOS). PEComa may affect a variety of organs with varying morphology, which makes diagnosis difficult. PEComa-NOS of the pancreas is very rare. Our research may inform clinicians and pathologists about the features of PEComa at the pancreas.

PEComa of the pancreas affects females more frequently, and the pancreatic head and body are usually affected. Among all reported cases, there are 18 females and 4 males, with a male-to-female ratio of 1:4.5, indicating that females’ incidence is significantly higher than that among males. Consistent with the prevalence of the disease, this case is also a female patient. The youngest patient is aged 17 years old, and the oldest is aged 76. 81.82% (18/22) of the cases are aged 30 to 60, indicating that young and middle-aged people are mostly affected. 59.09% (13/22) of the cases present with abdominal pain or discomfort, while some (31.82%, 7/22) are found without specific symptoms upon physical examination. Most PEComas in the pancreas are benign. There are only 2 reports of metastatic cases [8,17] and a cyst was enlarged from 8 mm to 5.8 cm in one case during a 3-year follow-up [22] (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinical features of perivascular epithelioid cell tumor of the pancreas in the literature

Author Year Age Sex Symptoms Location Imaging findings Operative procedures Recurrence Size (cm) Diagnosis Follow up (months)
1 Zamboni 1996 60 F Abdominal pain Body CT revealed a well-demarcated solid lesion with even texture DP - 2 Clear cell sugar tumor 3
2 Heywood 2004 74 F Abdominal pain Head CT revealed cystic lesion with irregular thick capsules PPPD - 4.7 Angiomyolipoma 69
3 Ramuz 2005 31 F Abdominal pain Body CT indicated a round-like solid lesion with bleeding SPDP - 1.5 Sugar tumor 9
4 Perigny 2008 46 F Diarrhea Body CT indicated a nodule of 1.7 cm Enucleation - 1.7 PEComa 3
5 Ferga 2008 33 F Head, body and tail Ultrasonography indicated a hypoechoic cystic lesion - 1 12
6 Hirabayashi 2009 47 F Abdominal pain Head MRI indicated a solid round lesion, with low T1W1 signals PPPD -- 1.7 PEComa 12
7 Baez 2009 60 F Abdominal bulge Body CT indicated a solid round lesion with bleeding DP - 3.5 PEComa (sugar tumor) 7
8 Zemet 2011 49 M Fever, cough and malaise Head CT revealed a mass with calcifications, which was 30 × 40 mm in size and located at the head of the pancreas. EUS identified a well demarcated hyperechoic calcified mass PPPD - 4 PEComa 10
9 Nagatas 2011 52 M Abdominal pain Head Imaging examinations revealed a 4.0 cm mass located in the pancreatic head PD Liver metastasis 4 PEComa 27
10 Feilai Xie 58 M Recurrent abdominal pain Head MRI indicated a round-like nodule, with slightly high T2W1, adipose inhibition and DWI signals and low T1W1 signals 5
11 Finzi 2012 62 F None Head EUS showed a 2.0 × 2.0 cm solid and well-demarcated mass in the posterior pancreatic head. MDCT indicated a 2.5 cm round, solid, well-defined, and homogeneous nodule, which was slightly hyperdense without a significant contrast enhancement Total excision - 2.5 PEComa 5
12 Al-Haddad 2013 38 F Abdominal pain Uncinate process CT demonstrated a hypervascular pancreatic uncinate lesion. EUS confirmed an 18 mm, well-circumscribed, hypoechoic, homogenous mass without vascular invasion PD N.A 1.8 PEComa NA
13 Okuwaki 2013 43 F Abdominal pain Body and tail CT showed a relatively well-demarcated mass (10 cm, maximum diameter) in the body and tail of the pancreas, with an intermingling of high signal intensity inside the tumor DP - 10 PEComa 7
14 Moura N 2013 51 - F Abdominal pain, jaundice Head e. Imaging studies showed dilatation of common and intrahepatic bile ducts related to an intrapancreatic mass, consistent with endocrine or secondary tumor PD Liver metastasis 6 malignant PEComa 6
15 Yunyuan Li 2016 47 F None Body Ultrasonography indicated a hypoechoic lesion, which was presented as a low-density shadow on CT Surgical removal (unknown details) - 1.7 PEComa 8
16 Petrides C 2015 17 F Melena, anemia Head CT demonstrated a mass at the head of the pancreas, which was 4.2 cm in diameter. EUS showed an ulcerating malignant looking mass infiltrating 50% of the wall of the second part of the duodenum in the region of the ampulla PPPD - 4.2 PEComa 18
17 Yusuke 2015 61 F Abdominal pain Body CT revealed that a solid low-density mass of approximately 7 cm in diameter, which was circumferentially well-demarcated and located in the pancreatic body PD - 7 PEComa 12
18 TAN Y 2016 58 F None Body Ultrasonography indicated a hyperechoic mass at the pancreatic body, which was well-demarcated and 1.8 cm in size; MRI showed a solid round nodule with low T1-weighted signals, and there was no dilation and stenosis of the main pancreatic duct and interlobar ducts middle pancreatectomy - 2 PEComa 5
19 Maurizio 2017 68 M Abdominal pain Head Ultrasonography and CT showed a hypervascular, well-demarcated lesion of the pancreatic head which had a maximum diameter of 28 mm and no relation with neighboring organs EUS-FNA, not selected for surgery but follow-up alone A couple episodes of abdominal pain and the lesion remained stable in size 2.8 PEComa 13
20 J.Wei 2016 58 F None Body CT: an asymptomatic pancreatic body mass. Abdominal ultrasonography: a slightly hyperechoic pancreatic body mass Middle pancreatectomy - 1.8 PEComa 18
21 Hui 2016 50 F None Head CT: a relatively low-density nodule in the uncus of the pancreas; MRI: low T1W1 signal nodule, which had clear contrast with adjacent normal pancreatic of a relatively high signal Operation - 1.4 PEComa 14
22 Christopher 2016 31 F History of de novo TSC Body Enhanced CT scan identified an 8 mm cyst in the body of the pancreas, which enlarged to 5.8 cm by 2013. Endoscopic ultrasonography demonstrated a cystic lesion with no connection to pancreatic ducts, with a solid oligolocular cyst Distal pancreatectomy - 5.8 PEComa -
23 Our case 2018 40 F None Body Moderately progressive enhancement and solid pseudopapillary tumor, cystic & solid lesion Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy - 2.3 PEComa 30

DP, distal pancreatectomy; PPPD, pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy; PD, pancreaticoduodenectomy; EUS, endoscopic ultrasonography; PEComa, perivascular epithelioid cell tumor.

Abdominal B-mode ultrasonography usually indicates a hypoechoic cystic-solid lesion rich in blood supply. The lesion may be hyperechoic in the presence of calcifications. Those with typical CT manifestations usually have homogeneous solid lesions presenting as a coin-like shape and a quasi-circular hypodense shadow with a clear boundary in the pancreas. A slightly higher density is usually found when the lesion was accompanied by bleeding. Typical MRI findings include a cystic-solid lesion with a relatively clear boundary and mildly hyperdense signals on T2W1, fat-suppressed and DWI images, and low signals on T1W1 images (Table 1).

PEComa of the pancreas is usually composed of even epithelioid cells, some of which are fusiform. Tumor cells are lobulated or in a patchy distribution. Between the lobules and patchy tumor cells are fibrous vascular septa rich in thick- and thin-walled vessels. The cells are large, and are of a circular or polygonal shape. The rich cytoplasm is transparent and contains eosinophilic granules, which are stained positive by PAS and could be digested by amylase, indicating that the cytoplasm is rich in glycogen other than mucus. The tumor cells have small nuclei, which are mildly heteromorphic and located in the middle or deviated. The nuclei are round, oval, or found with an irregular notch. The chromatin is refined in texture, and the nucleolus is inconspicuous. Mitosis is rare. Histologic malignant features include nuclear pleomorphism, pronounced heteromorphic nuclei, multinucleated giant cells, high mitotic index, accompanying bleeding and necrosis, tumor infiltrating the adjacent normal pancreatic tissues, and distant metastasis. Our case showed typical histologic features of PEComa of the pancreas without signs of malignancy. Depending on biologic behavior, PEcoma is divided into benign, uncertain malignant potential, and malignant. Benign PEcoma is usually smaller than 5 cm in diameter, presenting with non-infiltrative growth, bland cell morphology, number of mitotic figures ≤ 1/50 HPF, no necrosis, and no vascular invasion. Uncertain malignant potential is considered if any of the below situations are found: (1) Polygonal or multinucleated giant cells; or (2) Tumor diameter > 5 cm. There are no clear criteria for the diagnosis of malignant PEComa. The latest version of the 2016 WHO classification about soft tissue and bone tumor only briefly mentions that malignant PEComas are characterized by mitotic activity, necrosis, marked nuclear atypia, and pleomorphism. There are reports in the literature that suggest malignant PEComa is considered if any two or more of the below situations are found: (1) Tumor diameter > 5 cm; (2) Infiltrative growth; (3) Pronounced heteromorphic nuclei; (4) Number of mitotic figures > 1/50 HPF; (5) Necrosis; (6) Vascular invasion [23,24]. So far, only 2 cases of malignant PEcoma have been reported, and all the remaining cases (including ours) have been benign. Our case of PEcoma was 2.3 cm in diameter (< 5 cm), presenting with non-infiltrative growth, mild cell morphology, number of mitotic figures ≤ 1/50 HPF, no necrosis, and no vascular invasion. Based on these above characteristics, this case was diagnosed as benign PEComa.

Specific expressions of melanin markers feature the immunophenotype of PEComa at the pancreas. The HMB-45 expression is usually the highest, followed by MelanA. Markers for smooth muscle cell differentiation are also expressed, such as SMA and desmin. Epithelial cell markers (CK, EMA) and endocrine markers (S-100, Syn, and CgA) are negative, and so are ER and PR. The immunophenotype of PEComa at the pancreas is consistent with PEComa in other sites.

It has been shown [25,26] that liver and kidney AML and lung LAM are usually accompanied by tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), which is an autosomal dominant inherited disease, probably associated with the mutations in the TSC1 gene (9q3.4, 27%) and TSC2 gene (16p13.3, 73%). TSC genes primarily work by regulating the Rheb/mTOR/p70S6K signaling pathway, and their mutations may lead to activation disorder of mTORC1, thus resulting in a tumor. Kenerson et al. [27] found that the upregulation of phosphorylated p70S6K (a marker of mTOR activity) in AML agreed with the functional damage of TSC1 or TSC2. Gondran et al. [28] reported the first case of pancreatic PEComa treated by mTOR inhibitor Sirolimus without surgery, which showed a significant reduction in size of the tumor after 3.5 years suggesting a good efficiency of mTOR inhibitor therapy. There are still limited cellular and molecular genetics studies about PEComa at the pancreas, and most of the reported cases of PEComa at the pancreas, including our case, are not correlated with TSC. The correlation between PEComa at the pancreas and TSC remains unclear. Additional knowledge can be gained in this field with more reported cases and advances in molecular genetic technology.

Several types of tumors are associated with the upregulation of genes in the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MiTF) family, which share some similar histomorphologic features as PEComa. TFE3 is a member of the MiTF family. Several recent studies have reported the positive expression of TFE3 in PEComa of the liver and kidney [29,30]. About 23% of cases with PECcoma are associated with TFE3 rearrangement plus SFPQ/PSF-TFE3 and DVL2-TFE3 gene fusions, or only TFE3 rearrangement without gene fusions. In our case, TFE3 protein was negatively expressed, so gene detection was not carried out. Some cases with PEComa in other sites are positive for TFE3, but so far, positive TFE protein expression and gene fusion have not been reported in PEComa of the pancreas, which may be attributed to the limited number of cases. Also, the pathogenesis of PEComa at the pancreas may not be related to TFE3 translocation. Alternatively, it may just be an independent subtype of PEComa.

The reported cases of PEComa of the pancreas are generally treated by en-bloc or complete resection of the pancreas and tumor. Given the fact that PEComa is benign in most cases, surgery may not be recommended unless the lesions grow, and the cytology is atypical in the preoperative puncture pathologic diagnosis. The patients can receive regular follow-up in the absence of symptoms. Maurizio et al. [19] believes that surgery may not be the best choice for PEComa of the pancreas, since it is generally benign. Follow-up is recommended for the patients and is confirmed pathologically by fine-needle aspiration. The pancreas is an important digestive organ, and pancreatic resection has an adverse impact on patients’ digestive function and impairs patients’ life quality. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the pancreas has been widely used clinically, If pancreatic tumors undergo fine needle aspiration and mTOR pathway activity detection can be used for the diagnosis of PECOMA before surgery, mTOR inhibitor would be a good treatment option for the clinician and patient to avoid surgical damage. Although this type of treatment is not yet supported by clinical data it still has good application prospects. Our case was followed up for 30 months, and relapse was not found.

Conclusions

This article reports one rare case of classic PEComa at the pancreas, and the literature review was performed to analyze the clinical history, imaging findings, histopathology, immunohistochemistry, genetic molecular research progress, treatment, and prognosis of pancreatic PEComa. It is not easy for clinicians to consider this disease due to the rare characteristics of this kind of tumor, and this paper summarizes the characteristics and research progress of the pancreatic PEComa, which is convenient for physicians and pathologists to fully understand the disease to avoid misdiagnosis and to provide a new treatment and prognosis reference.

Acknowledgements

We thank every author’s contribution for this article and thank the support of NO. 2019GSF108268, NO. 2016GSF201137. This case report was approved by the ethics committee of the Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University and the patient gave written informed consent prior to obtain the data. This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and all authors agreed the publish statements of International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Zamboni G, Pea M, Martignoni G, Zancanaro C, Faccioli G, Gilioli E, Pederzoli P, Bonetti F. Clear cell “sugar” tumor of the pancreas. A novel member of the family of lesions characterized by the presence of perivascular epithelioid cells. Am J Surg Pathol. 1996;20:722–730. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199606000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Heywood G, Smyrk TC, Donohue JH. Primary angiomyolipoma of the pancreas. Pancreas. 2004;28:443–445. doi: 10.1097/00006676-200405000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ramuz O, Lelong B, Giovannini M, Delpero JR, Rochaix P, Xerri L, Hassoun J, Flejou JF, Monges G. “Sugar” tumor of the pancreas: a rare entity that is diagnosable on preoperative fine-needle biopsies. Virchows Arch. 2005;446:555–559. doi: 10.1007/s00428-005-1216-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Perigny M, Larochelle O, Hammel P, Sauvanet A, Dokmak S, Belghiti J, Ruszniewski P, Vilgrain V, Bedossa P, Couvelard A. Pancreatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) Ann Pathol. 2008;28:138–142. doi: 10.1016/j.annpat.2007.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gleeson FC, de la Mora Levy JG, Zhang L, Levy MJ. The differential broadens. EUS FNA appearance and cytological findings of pancreatic angiomyolipoma. JOP. 2008;9:67–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hirabayashi K, Nakamura N, Kajiwara H, Hori S, Kawaguchi Y, Yamashita T, Dowaki S, Imaizumi T, Osamura RY. Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) of the pancreas: immunoelectron microscopy and review of the literature. Pathol Int. 2009;59:650–655. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2009.02421.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Baez JC, Landry JM, Saltzman JR, Qian X, Zinner MJ, Mortelé KJ. Pancreatic PEComa (sugar tumor): MDCT and EUS features. JOP. 2009;10:679–682. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zemet R, Mazeh H, Neuman T, Freund HR, Eid A. Asymptomatic pancreatic perivascular epithelial cell tumor (PEComa) in a male patient: report and literature review. JOP. 2011;12:55–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nagata S, Yuki M, Tomoeda M, Kubo C, Yoshizawa H, Kitamura M, Uehara H, Katayama K, Nakayama H, Okamoto Y, Hanaki H, Kido S, Ichiki T, Tomita Y. Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasm (PEComa) originating from the pancreas and metastasizing to the liver. Pancreas. 2011;40:1155–1157. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318221fc0e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xie FL, Song YN, Qu LJ, Yu YH, Zheng ZY. Clinicopathologic features of perivascular epithelioid cell tumor of the pancreas. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;19:964–968. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Finzi G, Micello D, Wizemann G, Sessa F, Capella C. Pancreatic PEComa: a case report with ultrastructural localization of HMB-45 within melanosomes. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2012;36:124–129. doi: 10.3109/01913123.2011.642463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Al-Haddad M, Cramer HM, Muram T, Wang X, Pitt HA. Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor: an unusual pancreatic mass diagnosed by EUS-FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:165. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.02.011. discussion 165-167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Okuwaki K, Kida M, Masutani H, Yamauchi H, Katagiri H, Mikami T, Miyazawa S, Iwai T, Takezawa M, Imaizumi H, Koizumi W. A resected perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) of the pancreas diagnosed using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Intern Med. 2013;52:2061–2066. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.52.0746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mourra N, Lazure T, Colas C, Arrive L, de Gramont A. Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor: the first malignant case report in the pancreas. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2013;21:e1–4. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0b013e3182392bb6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yunyuan L, Binbin L, Hongwei C, Chunyan X. Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) of the pancreas: a clinicopathological analysis. Diag Pathol. 2016;23:172–175. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Petrides C, Neofytou K, Khan AZ. Pancreatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumour presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2015;2015:431215. doi: 10.1155/2015/431215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mizuuchi Y, Nishihara K, Hayashi A, Tamiya S, Toyoshima S, Oda Y, Nakano T. Perivascular epithelial cell tumor (PEComa) of the pancreas: a case report and review of previous literatures. Surg Case Rep. 2016;2:59. doi: 10.1186/s40792-016-0186-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yang T, Xiao L, zhihong Z, Hongxia L. Melanin-rich pancreatic PEComa: a case report and review of literature. Diag Pathol. 2016;23:1845–1849. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zizzo M, Castro Ruiz C, Ugoletti L, Bonacini S, Giunta A, Valli R, Sereni G, Manenti A, Pedrazzoli C. Primary pancreatic pecoma: is surgery always the best choice? JOP. 2017;18:241–243. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wei J, Liu X, Fu Y, Gao W, Jiang K, Zhang Z, Miao Y. Primary perivascular epithelioid cell tumor of the pancreas: a case report. Pancreatology. 2016;16:S30. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jiang H, Ta N, Huang XY, Zhang MH, Xu JJ, Zheng KL, Jin G, Zheng JM. Pancreatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumor: a case report with clinicopathological features and a literature review. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:3693–3700. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hartley CP, Kwiatkowski DJ, Hamieh L, Lefferts JA, Smith KD, Lisovsky M. Pancreatic PEComa is a novel member of the family of tuberous sclerosis complex-associated tumors: case report and review of the literature. Virchows Arch. 2016;469:707–710. doi: 10.1007/s00428-016-2032-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.D’Andrea D, Hanspeter E, D’Elia C, Martini T, Pycha A. Malignant perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasm (PEComa) of the pelvis: a case report. Urol Case Rep. 2016;6:36–38. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2016.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhao J, Teng H, Zhao R, Ding W, Yu K, Zhu L, Zhang J, Han Y. Malignant perivascular epithelioid cell tumor of the lung synchronous with a primary adenocarcinoma: one case report and review of the literature. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:235. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5383-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hammes SR, Krymskaya VP. Targeted approaches toward understanding and treating pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) Horm Cancer. 2013;4:70–77. doi: 10.1007/s12672-012-0128-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li S, Zhang Y, Wei J, Zhang X. Clinical and genetic analysis of tuberous sclerosis complex-associated renal angiomyolipoma in Chinese pedigrees. Oncol Lett. 2017;14:7085–7090. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kenerson H, Folpe AL, Takayama TK, Yeung RS. Activation of the mTOR pathway in sporadic angiomyolipomas and other perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms. Hum Pathol. 2007;38:1361–1371. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gondran H, Thebaud E, Moreau A, Le Rhun M, Touchefeu Y, Regenet N, Musquer N. First pancreatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) treated by mTOR inhibitor. Pancreatology. 2019;19:566–568. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2019.05.459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang H, Zhan H, Yao Z, Liu Q. Malignant renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma with TFE3 gene amplification mimicking renal carcinoma. Clin Nephrol Case Stud. 2018;6:11–15. doi: 10.5414/CNCS109443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schoolmeester JK, Dao LN, Sukov WR, Wang L, Park KJ, Murali R, Hameed MR, Soslow RA. TFE3 translocation-associated perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasm (PEComa) of the gynecologic tract: morphology, immunophenotype, differential diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39:394–404. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES