Abstract
Fluorescent amino acids (FAAs) offer significant advantages over fluorescent proteins in applications where the fluorophore size needs to be limited or minimized. A long-sought goal in biological spectroscopy/microcopy is to develop visible FAAs by modifying the indole ring of tryptophan. Herein, we examine the absorption spectra of a library of 4-substituted indoles and find that the frequency of the absorption maximum correlates linearly with the global electrophilicity index of the substituent. This finding permits us to identify two promising candidates, 4-formyltryptophan (4CHO-Trp) and 4-nitrotryptophan (4NO2-Trp), both of which can be excited by visible light. Further fluorescence measurements indicate that while 4CHO-indole (and 4CHO-Trp) emits cyan fluorescence with a reasonably large quantum yield (ca. 0.22 in ethanol), 4NO2-indole is essentially non-fluorescent, suggesting that 4CHO-Trp (4NO2-Trp) could be useful as a fluorescence reporter (quencher). In addition, we present a simple method for synthesizing 4CHO-Trp.
Introduction
Because of the high sensitivity, low cost and ease of use, fluorescence spectroscopy/microscopy is one of the most widely used techniques in biochemistry, biophysics, and biology. Applications range from tracking biomolecules in the cell1 to probing protein folding and conformational dynamics.2,3 While exceedingly useful, this technique requires the presence of at least one fluorophore in the biological system of interest, and in many cases, the chosen fluorophore dictates the type of information extractable from the corresponding fluorescence measurements. Due to this requirement, as well as the fact that the majority of biological molecules are intrinsically nonfluorescent or lack a useful fluorescent reporter, most fluorescence studies necessitate the introduction of one or multiple external fluorophores. Therefore, one of the major efforts in chemical biology and biophysics is to develop a diverse set of fluorophores that are useful under different requirements and conditions.
Currently, the available biological fluorophores can be broadly characterized as fluorescent proteins (FPs), organic fluorescent dyes, fluorescent nano-sensors, quantum dots, fluorescent transition metal complexes, and/or fluorescent amino acids (FAAs). Among them, FAAs are particularly suitable for applications where the fluorophore size needs to be minimized, or the chemical structure needs to be similar to the native amino acid it replaces, due to concerns of structural or physicochemical perturbations. While several recent studies4–9 have reinforced this notion, the choice of minimally perturbative FAAs is currently limited, thus requiring further development.
Among the naturally occurring FAAs, tryptophan (Trp) is the most fluorescent. However, the utility of tryptophan in biological milieu is limited by several undesirable photophysical properties (e.g., low fluorescence quantum yield (QY), low photostability, and excitable only with UV photons).10,11 Importantly, the source of tryptophan’s fluorescence, the indole ring, provides a template for engineering FAAs with improved photophysical properties. Therefore, many past studies have focused on developing Trp-based FAAs that can offer new and/or improved spectroscopic utility.12–19 Despite the past efforts only recently did Hilaire et al.20 discover that 4-cyanotryptophan (4CN-Trp) exhibits significantly different photophysical properties than Trp, making it a promising FAA for biological spectroscopic and imaging applications.21 However, while 4CN-Trp emits in the blue region of the visible spectrum with a large QY (>0.8), its one-photon excitation wavelength is still in the UV region (up to ca. 360 nm). Therefore, in this study we seek to identify indole-based chromophores that can absorb and emit visible light.
A previous study has shown that amongst all CN-substituted indoles, 4CN-indole produces the most red-shifted absorption and emission spectra.22 A similar trend is also observed for azaindoles23 and formyl indoles.24 These findings suggest the 4-position of the indole ring is special in that its local electronic density may have a greater effect on the electronic transition dipole moment(s) of the indole chromophore. While validation of this notion needs further quantum mechanical calculations, we hypothesize that the absorption and emission wavelengths of 4-substituted indoles could be tuned by changing the electronic properties of the substituent. If confirmed, such tunability would help discover Trp derivatives that afford novel spectroscopic properties and utilities. In an effort to test our hypothesis, herein we first determine the absorption and emission spectra of a diverse library of 4X-indoles and then evaluate how their electronic transition energy (i.e., that corresponding to the maximum absorption wavelength) correlates with various scales characterizing the electronic effect of X. Based on the results obtained with 4X-indoles, we further identify two Trp-based unnatural amino acids, 4-formyltryptophan (4CHO-Trp) and 4-nitrotryptophan (4NO2-Trp), that can be excited by visible light and hence could have useful biospectroscopic applications. In addition, we describe a facile synthetic route to construct 4CHO-Trp.
Experimental details
Materials
4-Bromoindole, indole-4-carboxaldehyde, indole-4-carboxylic acid, 4-cyanoindole, 4-fluoroindole, 4-methylindole, 4-nitroindole, and L-4-bromo-tryptophan were purchased from Chem-Impex Int’l Inc. 4-Aminoindole was purchased from Ark Pharm, Inc. All commercial reagents were used as received. All other 4X-indoles as well as L-Nα-acetyl-4-formyltryptophan were synthesized using the protocols described in detail in the ESI.
Absorption measurements
UV-vis absorption spectra were collected on a Jasco V-650 UV-vis spectrophotometer using a quartz cuvette of 1.0 cm path length at room temperature. The concentrations of all samples were kept at ca. 25 μM.
Fluorescence measurements and quantum yield (QY) determination
Steady state fluorescence measurements were carried out on a Jobin Yvon Horiba Fluorolog 3.10 spectrofluorometer at 20 °C using a quartz cuvette of 1.0 cm path length. All the measurements were done using 1 nm excitation/emission slits, an integration time of 1.0 nm/s, and an excitation wavelength of either 270 nm (for 4X-indoles whose absorption spectra are similar to that of indole) or 350 nm (for 4X-indoles whose absorption spectra are similar to, or red-shifted from, that of 4CN-indole). The sample concentrations were ca. 5 μM.
For each sample, QY was determined at 20 °C using either quinine sulfate in 0.5 M sulfuric acid (when λex = 350 nm was used) or 4CN-indole in water (when λex = 270 nm was used) as the reference and the following relationship:
where I is the integrated fluorescence intensity, A is the optical density of the fluorophore at λex, n is the refractive index of the solvent, and the subscripts S and R represent the sample and reference, respectively. In addition, QYR of 0.543 (0.85) was used for quinine sulfate (4CN-indole).
Results and discussion
The 4X-indole library was assembled to include both electron-donating and -withdrawing substituents varying in their degree and manner (e.g., induction and π conjugation) of electronic perturbation. Specifically, the X substituents include -F, -Cl, -Br, -I, -OH, -CN (cyano), -NC, -N3, -NO2 (nitro), -NH2, -NHCH3 (-NHMe), -N(CH3)2 (-NMe2), -N(CH3)3+ (-NMe3+), -NHC(O)Me (-N-Ac), -NHC(O)CF3 (-N-TFA), -CH3 (-Me), -CHO (formyl), -C(O)OH (-CO2H), -C(O)OCH3 (-CO2Me), -OC(O)Me (-O-Ac), and -OC(O)CF3 (-O-TFA). Derivatives not commercially available were obtained through chemical synthesis (Scheme S1 in the ESI). Many of the 4X-indoles examined have diminishingly low solubility in water thus necessitating the use of ethanol as the solvent. As expected, the absorption spectra of 4X-indoles depend on the nature of the substituent (Fig. S1, ESI). As indicated (Fig. 1 and Table 1), a general trend that emerged from this data is that an electron-withdrawing group (EWG) shifts the wavelength of maximum absorbance () to the red relative to that of indole, whereas an electron-donating group (EDG) does the opposite. In addition, a strong EWG (e.g., NO2) tends to increase the overall width of the absorption spectrum. To provide a more quantitative assessment of the effect of the substituent, X, on the absorption spectra of 4X-indoles, we sought to identify possible correlations between and the electron-attracting propensity of X. A widely used empirical for quantifying the electron-withdrawing or donating nature of a substituent is the Hammett parameter (δ).This parameter was originally formulated to quantify the effect of a substituent (relative to a hydrogen atom) on various physicochemical properties (e.g., ionization constant and reaction rate) of an aromatic molecule in the ground state,25 but has since found similar utility in assessing the excited-state processes and photochemical behaviors of substituted aromatic molecules.26,27 As shown (Fig. S3, ESI), the frequencies of maximum absorbance () of 4X-indoles exhibits only a weak correlation with either the δmeta (R2 = 0.20) or δpara (R2 = 0.30) values28 of X, indicating that δ is not a good predictor of the effect of a substituent on or . However, the observed trend is consistent with our initial expectation that a strong EWG (e.g., NO2 and CHO) does lead to an increase in .
Table 1.
X | (nm) | (nm) | QY | δmeta | δpara | F | R | ω (eV) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CN | 304 | 387 | 0.85 | 0.56 | 0.66 | 0.51 | 0.15 | 1.74 |
NO2 | 375 | 524 | 0.0012 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.65 | 0.13 | 2.61 |
CHO | 340 | 460 | 0.22 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.33 | 0.13 | 1.83 |
O-TFA | 330 | 358 | <0.0001 | 0.56 | 0.46 | 0.58 | −0.12 | - |
CO2Me | 312 | 418 | 0.52 | 0.37 | 0.45 | 0.34 | 0.11 | 1.51 |
CO2H | 312 | 414 | 0.49 | 0.37 | 0.45 | 0.34 | 0.11 | 1.61 |
NC | 299 | 367 | 0.085 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.02 | 1.48 |
N3 | 295 | 330 | 0.0058 | 0.37 | 0.08 | 0.48 | −0.40 | 1.3 |
N-TFA | 292 | 313 | 0.0021 | 0.30 | 0.12 | 0.38 | −0.26 | - |
N-Ac | 288 | 382 | 0.0029 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.31 | −0.31 | - |
H | 278 | 354 | 0.14 | - | - | - | - | - |
NMe3+ | 285 | 365 | 0.010 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 0.86 | −0.04 | |
Br | 280 | 332 | 0.011 | 0.39 | 0.23 | 0.45 | −0.22 | 0.89 |
NMe2 | 278 | 338 | 0.013 | −0.15 | −0.83 | 0.15 | −0.98 | 0.27 |
Cl | 278 | 327 | 0.0056 | 0.37 | 0.23 | 0.42 | −0.19 | 0.91 |
NHMe | 274 | 336 | 0.014 | −0.21 | −0.70 | 0.03 | −0.73 | - |
NH2 | 272 | 333 | 0.0091 | −0.16 | −0.66 | 0.08 | −0.74 | 0.3 |
O−Ac | 270 | 307 | 0.0097 | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.42 | −0.11 | 1.01 |
Me | 270 | 305 | 0.28 | −0.07 | −0.17 | 0.01 | −0.18 | 0.6 |
OH | 264 | 306 | 0.078 | 0.12 | −0.37 | 0.33 | −0.70 | 0.44 |
F | 260 | 303 | 0.019 | 0.34 | 0.06 | 0.45 | −0.39 | 0.68 |
Since δ contains contributions from a field (or induction) component (through parameter F) and a resonance component (through parameter R),28,29 we also analyzed the dependence of on F and R. As indicated (Fig. S4 in the ESI), neither F (R2 = 0.10) nor R (R2 = 0.34) significantly improves the strength of the correlation.
Another more recently proposed scale for measuring the propensity of a molecule (or group) to acquire additional electronic density from the environment is the global electrophilicity index (ω),30–32 which is defined as μ2/2η, where μ and η are the chemical potential and hardness of the molecule, respectively. Chemical hardness (η) is defined as the change in chemical potential with the change in the number of electrons, hence describing a molecule’s resistance towards changes in electron density and distribution. Considering that indole’s electronic transition(s) to the lowest excited state(s) involves a partial electron transfer from the pyrrole to the benzyl portion of the ring33,34 and that ω measures the energy of stabilization of a species due to acquirement of additional electronic charge, we hypothesized that the stability of the excited state(s) of 4X-indole would correlate well with the ω value of X. As shown (Fig. 2), indeed exhibits a strong positive correlation with ω, which was obtained from the computational study of Domingo et al. using mono-substituted ethylene as a reduced model for more complex aromatic systems,35 as judged by the R2 value (0.84).
The observed correlation suggests that the ability of a substituent, X, to stabilize a 4X-indole’s excited state is a function of both X’s affinity for the indole’s π electron density and the polarizability of X’s own electron density as dictated by η. Moreover, this result validates the ability of ω to predict the electronic transition energy of 4X-indoles. However, further studies are necessary to determine whether ω can also be used in a predictive fashion for other aromatic fluorophores.
As observed for the absorption spectra, the fluorescence spectra of these 4X-indoles in ethanol are all broad and featureless (Fig. S2, ESI). In addition, most display a large (>60 nm) Stokes shift (Fig. 1 and Table 1). Furthermore, like that observed for , the frequency of maximum emission intensity () only correlates well with ω (Fig. 2 and Fig. S3 and S4, ESI).
For any molecule to be useful as a fluorescence reporter, it must have a reasonably large QY. Therefore, we also characterized the QYs of these 4X-indoles. As indicated (Table 1), most of the 4X-indoles examined have a low QY (<0.1), making them less useful as stand-alone fluorophores in biological studies. However, 4CO2H-indole, 4CO2Me-indole, and 4CHO-indole all have a relatively high QY (>0.2).
The experimental results presented above provide us with the needed information to identify new 4X-indole-based FAAs, especially those whose fluorescence can be excited with visible light. In this regard, 4-formyltryptophan (4CHO-Trp) is the most attractive fluorophore as 4-formylindole has a fluorescence QY of 0.22 in ethanol and an absorption spectrum extending beyond 390 nm. A recent study on formylindoes by Zhang and coworkers24 reached a similar conclusion. While 4-nitroindole (4NO2-indole) has the most red-shifted absorption spectrum and is a true visible chromophore, the very low fluorescence QY (ca. 0.001) makes 4-nitrotryptophan (4NO2-Trp) unsuitable for fluorescence measurements. However, it could be used as a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) quencher of biological fluorophores whose absorption spectra are in the wavelength range of 380–450 nm, such as the nuclear stain DAPI and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP).
The fluorescence QY of Trp is significantly smaller than that of indole. Therefore, to confirm that 4CHO-Trp possesses similar fluorescent properties as 4CHO-indole, we devised a short and efficient route (Scheme 1) to synthesize N-acetyl-4-formyl-tryptophan-OMe (1) and also determined its QY in ethanol. Briefly, commercially available 4-bromo-L-tryptophan (2) was first esterified and acetylated to deliver N-acetyl-4-bromo-tryptophan-OMe (3) (58% yield). The aldehyde functionality was next installed via a convenient two step protocol wherein Suzuki cross-coupling of 3 with vinyl trifluoroborate (5)36 afforded N-acetyl-4-vinyl-tryptophan-OMe (4) which underwent Lemieux-Johnson oxidation to yield the desired 4CHO-Trp (1) (48% over 2 steps).
The results of Hilaire et al. indicated that the absorption and emission spectra of 4CN-Trp are further red-shifted from those of 4CN-indole.20 As shown (Fig. 3), 4CHO-Trp (1) follows the same trend as its and values are increased by 13 and 23 nm, respectively, from those of 4CHO-indole in ethanol. As a result, the absorption spectrum of 4CHO-Trp (1) in ethanol extends beyond 410 nm, making the fluorescence excitable by blue light sources. In addition, the fluorescence spectrum of 4CHO-Trp (1), which peaks at ca. 500 nm in ethanol, makes this Trp derivative a cyan fluorophore (Fig. 3). Finally, it is worth noting that Ladner et al.37 have employed various photoreactions of the indole ring of Trp38,39 to generate new Trp-based fluorophores and, interestingly, they found that one of the photoproducts, 4-imido-tryptophan, which was formed by the initially produced photoproduct 4-formyltryptophan via reaction between its aldehyde and amine groups, exhibited yellow color and had a of 535 nm.
Conclusions
In summary, we surveyed the absorption and emission properties of a large array of 4-substituted indoles (4X-indoles), aiming to identify new biologically useful fluorescent amino acids. Our results clearly demonstrate that the excitation energy (i.e., the frequency of the maximum of the absorption spectrum) of a 4X-indole depends on the global electrophilicity index (ω) of X. This correlation provides a convenient means to identify Trp derivatives whose absorption spectra are red-shifted from that of Trp and, especially, whose fluorescence can be excited by visible light. Moreover, we believe that our experimental data also provide important benchmark information for studies aiming to understand how a substitution on the indole ring affects its ground and excited state electronic structures via both theoretical and experimental approaches.40–42 Among the 4X-indoles studied, we find that 4CHO-indole and 4NO2-indole meet this requirement. However, 4NO2-indole is essentially non-fluorescent, making it only useful in FRET-based applications (i.e., serving as a FRET quencher).43 On the other hand, 4CHO-indole and its amino acid form, 4CHO-Trp, have a reasonably large fluorescence QY in ethanol (ca. 0.22), suggesting that this chromophore could be useful as a biological fluorescence reporter. However, to validate this point, further studies are needed to fully characterize the chemical and photophysical stabilities, the fluorescence decay kinetics, and the factors affecting the fluorescent properties of this FAA in a peptide or protein environment.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the Research Foundation of the University of Pennsylvania for support. R.J.M. is supported by NIAID (8PO1-A1-150471) and I.A.A. is supported by a NINDS D-SPAN Fellowship (F99 NS108544-01).
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary information
ESI contains the synthesis details of 4X-indoles as well as additional results.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
REFERENCES
- 1.Chudakov DM, Matz MV, Lukyanov S and Lukyanov KA, Physiol. Rev, 2010, 90, 1103–1163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Michalet X, Weiss S and Jäger M, Chem. Rev, 2006, 106, 1785–1813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Serrano AL, Waegele MM and Gai F, Protein Sci, 2012, 21, 157–170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rubini M, Lepthien S, Golbik R and Budisa N, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 2006, 1764, 1147–1158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hammond JW, Blasius TL, Soppina V, Cai D and Verhey KJ, J. Cell Biol 2010, 189, 1013–1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stadler C, Rexhepaj E, Singan VR, Murphy RF, Pepperkok R, Uhlen M, Simpson JC and Lundberg E, Nat. Methods, 2013, 10, 315–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Luo J, Uprety R, Naro Y, Chou C, Nguyen DP, Chin J and Dieters A, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2014, 136, 15551–15558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stout RF Jr., Snapp EL and Spray DC, J. Biol. Chem, 2015, 290, 23497–23514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hostetler ZM, Ferrie JJ, Bornstein MR, Sungwienwong I, Petersson EJ and Kohli RM, ACS Chem. Biol, 2018, 13, 2855–2861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen RF, Anal. Lett, 1967, 1, 35–42. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Roy R, Hohng S and Ha T, Nat. Methods, 2008, 5, 507–516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Negrerie M, Bellefeuille SM, Whitham S, Petrich JW and Thornburg RW, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1990, 112, 7419–7421. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ross JBA, Szabo AG and Hogue CWV, Methods Enzymol, 1997, 278, 151–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Budisa N and Pal PP, Biol. Chem, 2004, 385, 893–904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Talukder P, Chen S, Arce PM and Hecht SM, Org. Lett, 2014, 16, 556–559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Talukder P, Chen S, Roy B, Yakovchuk P, Spiering MM, Alam MP, Madathil MM, Bhattacharya C, Benkovic SJ and Hecht SM, Biochemistry, 2015, 54, 7457–7469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shen JY, Chao WC, Liu C, Pan HA, Yang HC, Chen CL, Lan YK, Lin LJ, Wang JS, Lu JF, Chou SCW, Tang KC and Chou PT, Nat. Commun, 2013, 4, 2611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chalyavi F, Gilmartin PH, Schmitz AJ, Fennie MW and Tucker MJ, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl 2018, 57, 7528–7532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang K, Ahmed IA, Kratochvil HT, DeGrado WF, Gai F and Jo H, Chem. Commun, 2019, 55, 5095–5098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hilaire MR, Ahmed IA, Lin C, Jo H. l., DeGrado WF and Gai F, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 2017, 114, 6005–6009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Acharyya A, Ahmed IA and Gai F, Methods Enzymol, 2020, 639, 191–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hilaire MR, Mukherjee D, Troxler T and Gai F, Chem. Phys. Lett, 2017, 685, 133–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lepthien S, Hoesl MG and Merkel L, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 2008, 105, 16095–16100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.You M, Fan H, Wang Y and Zhang W, Chem. Phys, 2019, 526, 110438. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hammett LP, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1937, 59, 96–103. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Papper V and Likhtenshtein GI, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 2001, 140, 39–52. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sadlej-Sosnowska N and Kijak M, Struct. Chem, 2012, 23, 359–365. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hansch C, Leo A and Taft RW, Chem. Rev, 1991, 91, 165–195. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hansen LD and Hepler LG, Can. J. Chem, 1972, 50, 1030–1035. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Maynard AT, Huang M, Rice WG and Covell DG, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 1998, 95, 11578–11583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Parr RG, Szentpaly L. v. and Liu S, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1999, 121, 1922–1924. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chattaraj PK, Sarkar U and Roy DR, Chem. Rev, 2006, 106, 2065–2091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Andrews LJ and Forster LS, Biochemistry, 1972, 11, 1875–1879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Levy RM, Westbrook JD, Kitchen DB and Krogh-Jespersen K, J. Phys. Chem, 1991, 95, 6756–6758. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Domingo LR, Perez P and Contreras R, J. Org. Chem, 2003, 68, 6060–6062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Molander GA and Rivero MR, Org. Lett, 2002, 4, 107–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ladner CL, Tran K, Le M, Turner RJ and Edwards RA, Photochem. Photobiol, 2014, 90, 1027–1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Voropei AV, Chernitskii YA, Konev SV, Krivitskii AP, Pinchuk SV and Shchukanova NA, Biophysics, 1992, 37, 743–745. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Edwards RA, Jickling G and Turner RJ, Photochem. Photobiol, 2002, 75, 362–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schneider M, M-L Hebestreit M Lindic M, Parsian H, Torres-Boy AY, Álvarez-Valtierra L, Meerts WL, Kühnemuth R and Schmitt M, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 2018, 20, 23441–23452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Abou-Hatab S and Matsika S, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2019, 123, 7424–7435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Henrichs C, Reineke M, M-L. Hebestreit and M. Schmitt, J. Mol. Struct, 2021, 1223, 129241. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ahmed IA, Rodgers JM, Eng C, Troxler T and Gai F, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 2019, 21, 12843–12849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.