Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012 Sep 7;22(21):6647–6650. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.08.114

Substituted pyrazolones require N2 hydrogen bond donating ability to protect against cytotoxicity from protein aggregation of mutant superoxide dismutase 1

Paul C Trippier a, Radhia Benmohammed b, Donald R Kirsch b, Richard B Silverman a,c,*
PMCID: PMC8168521  NIHMSID: NIHMS1700776  PMID: 23021992

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a debilitating and fatal neurodegenerative disease. Although the cause remains unknown, misfolded protein aggregates are seen in neurons of sporadic ALS patients, and familial ALS mutations, including mutations in superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), produce proteins with an increased propensity to misfold and aggregate. A structure activity relationship of a lead scaffold exhibiting neuroprotective activity in a G93A-SOD1 mouse model for ALS has been further investigated in a model PC12 cellular assay. Synthesis of biotinylated probes at the N1 nitrogen of the pyrazolone ring gave compounds (5d-e) that retained activity within 10-fold of the proton-bearing lead compound (5a) and were equipotent with a sterically less cumbersome N1-methyl substituted analogue (5b). However, when methyl substitution was introduced at N1 and N2 of the pyrazolone ring, the compound was inactive (5c). These data led us to investigate further the pharmacophoric nature of the pyrazolone unit. A range of N1 substitutions were tolerated, leading to the identification of an N1-benzyl substituted pyrazolone (5m), equipotent with 5a. Substitution at N2 or excision of N2, however, removed all activity. Therefore, the hydrogen bond donating ability of the N2-H of the pyrazolone ring appears to be a critical part of the structure, which will influence further analogue synthesis.

Keywords: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, superoxide dismutase 1, neuroprotection, pyrazolone, pharmacophore

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1700776-f0001.jpg


Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), commonly known as Lou Gehrig’s disease, is a progressive and ultimately fatal neurodegenerative disease, with a worldwide prevalence of approximately 2 per 100,000. The disease generally first presents between 40–60 years of age; loss of motor neurons controlling voluntary actions results in progressive muscle paralysis and death attributed to respiratory failure, typically within 3–5 years of diagnosis.1

Currently, the only approved drug for ALS, riluzole, extends median survival by only 2–3 months.2 Clearly, there is a need for new therapeutics; however, progress has been impeded because the underlying pathology of the disease remains unknown. There is strong evidence3 that one pathophysiological mechanism in particular, that of toxic protein misfolding and/or aggregation, may trigger motor neuron dysfunction and loss. Mutations in familial ALS (FALS) patients that promote protein misfolding and aggregation include Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase type 1 (SOD1),4 UBQLN2,5 TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43),6 fused in sarcoma/translated in liposarcoma (FUS/TLS),7 and angiogenin (ANG)8 and, in addition, TDP-43 aggregates are seen in motor neurons of sporadic ALS (SALS) patients.9

The clinical phenotype and pathology of SALS, which accounts for 90% of all ALS cases, are indistinguishable from those of the familial form.10 It has therefore been possible to make significant advances in studying the pathology of ALS through the investigation of the familial form of the disease,11 which accounts for only approximately 10% of all cases, 20% of which are caused by missense mutations in the gene encoding for the enzyme SOD1. Recent studies12 have now linked FALS to SALS through common SOD1 containing astrocytes, demonstrating that SOD1 is a viable target for both FALS and SALS, providing further impetus to the identification of compounds active in mutant SOD1 disease models.

We previously described13 a high throughput screening method for the identification of compounds active in a PC12 cell model in which protein aggregation and cell death depended on the expression of G93A SOD1. One of the chemical scaffolds identified in this screen was the arylsulfanylpyrazolones.14 Although ineffective as a potential therapeutic because of the metabolic instability of the sulfanyl linker, this scaffold has served as a valuable lead for detailed structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies,15 resulting in 5a (Scheme 1, Table 1), which has an EC50 = 0.067 μM in our G93A-SOD1-YFP assay method previously detailedbility identified.rties.tabollic ylpyrazolone type. on of compounds active against a cellu cell assay and is active in a mutant SOD1 mouse model of ALS. Methylation of 5a to 5b (Table 1) or conjugation with biotin (5d) gave compounds with similar EC50 values, but dimethylation to 5c gave an inactive compound. This intriguing result led us to investigate the cause for the inactivity of 5c relative to much more sterically-demanding active compounds, such as 5b and 5d. Here, we describe the SAR profile of the pyrazolone ring; substitution, excision, and replacement of one or both of the two nitrogen atoms is described, and the pharmacophoric nature of the N2 -position is demonstrated.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Synthesis of lead compound 5a via Weinreb amide intermediate 3.

Table 1.

SAR studies of substitution of the pyrazolone ring.

graphic file with name nihms-1700776-t0002.jpg
Compound R1 R2 EC50 (μM)
a H H 0.067
b Me H 0.67
c Me Me >32a
d Biotin H 0.56
e Peg4-Biotin H 0.67
f CH2CH2OH H >32
g CH2CH2CH2OH H 0.34
h Ph H 1.03
i graphic file with name nihms-1700776-t0003.jpg H 1.73
j graphic file with name nihms-1700776-t0004.jpg H >32
k graphic file with name nihms-1700776-t0005.jpg H >32
l graphic file with name nihms-1700776-t0006.jpg H 1.00
m Bn H 0.13
n graphic file with name nihms-1700776-t0007.jpg H 0.36
o graphic file with name nihms-1700776-t0008.jpg H >32
p CHO H 0.49
q Ac H 0.27
r graphic file with name nihms-1700776-t0009.jpg H 0.42
s graphic file with name nihms-1700776-t0010.jpg H 0.31
t graphic file with name nihms-1700776-t0011.jpg H 0.33
u graphic file with name nihms-1700776-t0012.jpg H 1.71
v graphic file with name nihms-1700776-t0013.jpg H 0.93
w graphic file with name nihms-1700776-t0014.jpg H 1.32
a

>32 μM indicated EC50 not reached at the highest concentration used.

All values are reported as the mean average of three determinations.

Average Z’ factor value = 0.5.

The synthetic route delineated in Scheme 1 was modified in step iv to include the addition of suitably substituted hydrazine reagents, providing access to a wide range of N1-substituted pyrazolone analogues (Table 1). Phenyl, heteroaryl, alkyl, and acyl-substituted pyrazolones were synthesized and their activities determined.

Alkyl substitution at the N1-position of the pyrazolone ring is tolerated, albeit with an approximately 10-fold reduction in cell activity compared to 5a. All of the N1-substituted compounds were active except for 5f, 5j, 5k, and 5o. Steric hindrance, apparently, plays little or no role in the activity of the compounds synthesized; compounds with methyl (5b, EC50 = 0.67 μM), biotin (5d, EC50 = 0.56 μM) and tetraethyleneglycol-linked biotin (5e, EC50 = 0.67 μM) all display the same activity over a substituent length from one to 24 atoms including, in the case of biotin compounds 5d and 5e, the presence of a bulky tetrahydro-1H-thieno(3,4-d)imidazol-2(3H)-one ring.

The inactivity of 5f is intriguing because it is small and not bulky. As an explanation for this lack of activity, we considered the possibility that the compound exists in a bicyclic structure with the hydroxyl hydrogen bonded to the N2 position, thereby forming a 6-membered intramolecular hydrogen-bonded ring and blocking the hydrogen bond donating ability of the N2 position. To support this hypothesis, the hydroxypropyl-substituted compound (5g) was synthesized from known 3-hydrazinylpropan-1-ol.16 The corresponding hydrogen bonding in 5g would lead to an unfavorable seven-membered ring, which therefore would not be expected to form, allowing the hydrogen bond donating ability of the N2 position to be unobstructed. In agreement with this hypothesis, 5g was active (EC50 = 0.34 μM). The stability of the proposed six-membered hydrogen bonded ring has been estimated to be 20 kJ/mol17 (4.8 kcal/mol) and 29 kJ/mol (6.9 kcal/mol),18 which could account for the large difference in activity between 5f and 5g. Explanations relating to solubility, cell permeability, or bioavailability are unlikely, given the one methylene difference from that of 5g.

An alternative possibility regarding the importance of hydrogen bonding for activity is that the tautomeric enol form of the pyrazolone is the active form, and it is the enol hydroxyl that is essential for activity. If that were the case, there are two tautomeric forms, one that retains the N1-H and one that retains the N2-H (both still having the enol OH) (Figure 1). If the OH were the important H-bond donor, the activity would not be affected if the compound were methylated at N1 or N2. In a related series of compounds from our group,19 the N1-methylated analogue was active, but the N2-methylated analogue was not active. If the enol OH were relevant, both of those methylated compounds would have been active.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Tautomeric forms of the pyrazolones

An increase in electron-withdrawing ability should have an important effect on activity because of its decrease in the pKa of N2-H and corresponding promotion of hydrogen bond donation ability. Suprisingly, phenyl substitution at N1 attenuated the activity of the pyrazolone (5h, EC50 = 1.03 μM), allowing further characterization of the relatively expansive pocket environment the N1 substituents inhabit. A further decrease in activity of analogue 5i and total loss of activity with N1-phenyl analogues 5j and 5k, containing multiple strong electron-withdrawing substituents was observed. An explanation for the reduced activity seen with 5h and 5i may be the steric bulk of the introduced phenyl ring, which impedes the N2 position and prevents hydrogen bond donation. The lack of activity of 5j and 5k may be attributed to steric crowding by the ortho substituents, which completely block the hydrogen bond donating ability at N2, further supporting our assertion that this position represents an important pharmacophore of the pyrazolone moiety. These results support the importance of N2-H in its activity, presumably some hydrogen-bonding interaction with a target that is essential for activity. The N1-phenylthiazole substituted analogue (5l) is equipotent (EC50 = 1.00 μM) with phenyl substituted pyrazolone 5h, illustrating that five-membered aromatics and bulky bicyclics are tolerated at this position.

The moderate activity displayed by phenyl substitution, coupled with the relatively large steric pocket that N1 substituents inhabit, suggested the synthesis of a benzyl-substituted pyrazolone, providing steric relief from the phenyl moiety by the methylene spacer. Compound 5m was the most potent of the substituted pyrazolones yet synthesized, having an EC50 = 0.13 μM, essentially equivalent to that of 5a (EC50 = 0.067 μM) within the reproducibility of the assay.13 Substitution around the benzyl ring attenuates bioactivity; meta-hydroxybenzyl analogue 5n exhibits an almost three-fold reduction in potency (EC50 = 0.36 μM). Introduction of a para-methoxyl substituent (5o) renders the compound inactive. It is not clear why the para-methoxyl functionality exerts a deactivating effect.

Acyl substitution appears to be well tolerated. Pyrazolones 5p-5t have comparable EC50 values, and 5u-5w are comparable but about one-third less potent. To aid in future target identification studies of these compounds phenylisothiocyanate 5t was prepared. It was anticipated that this compound would act as a covalent linker, forming a bond with a suitably disposed residue within the target of action active site for use in subsequent affinity chromatography experiments. This was among the most potent of the acyl-substituted pyrazolones. Appendage of a biotin or affinity gel moiety to 5t will determine if this approach will be successful in a protein pull-down experiment.

To further establish the pharmacophoric nature of the N2 hydrogen bond donor group, a series of pyrazolone ring analogues was synthesized, which replaced N2 and other positions around the pyrazolone ring with heteroatoms and/or methylene groups. Lactone 9 was obtained from the nucleophilic coupling of known bromo-substituted lactone 820 and 3,5-dichlorophenol (Scheme 2) in analogy with compounds 5a-w. The lactone, lacking the hydrogen bond donor ability of the pyrazolone nitrogen at N2, was inactive in the assay, providing further evidence for the importance of the N2 position for bioactivity.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Synthesis of lactone analogue 9.

Replacement of the pyrazolone ring with a cyclopentanone ring (13) was achieved through an analogous coupling of known iodide 1221 with 3,5-dichlorophenol (Scheme 3) to produce a compound devoid of both nitrogen atoms of the pyrazolone ring and of biological activity.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3.

Synthesis of cyclopentanone 13

The isoxazol-3(2H)-one analogue (17) was synthesized (Scheme 4) using a modified procedure22. The lithium acetylide of propargyl bromide was treated with ethyl chloroformate to yield bromotetrolate 15; addition of an aqueous methanolic solution of hydroxylamine and careful control of pH afforded bromomethylisoxazole 16. Subsequent addition of 3,5-dichlorophenol provided 17, which, lacking the crucial N2 hydrogen bond donating group, displayed no activity.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4.

Synthesis of 3-bromo-4,5-dihydroisoxazole analogue 17.

Another ring system lacking the N2 hydrogen bond donor is illustrated by benzyl protected unsaturated pyrolidinone 22 (Scheme 5). This was obtained by reduction of commercially available pyrrolidinone ester 18 to form alcohol 19, followed by mesylation and nucleophilic addition of a bromide ion to furnish bromide 20 in good yield (42%) relative to the alternative Appel reaction (PBr3, pyridine; 2% yield); addition of 3,5-dichlorophenol to 20 provided pyrrolidinone 21. Subsequent addition of phenylselenyl bromide to the prepared enolate and selenoxide elimination provided unsaturated pyrrolidinone 22, identical to the most potent analogue (5m) except lacking the crucial N2-H. Again, both 21 and 22, possessing no N2 hydrogen bond donor, had no activity (EC50 = >32 μM).

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5.

Synthesis of protected pyrolidinone analogue 22

In conclusion, we have shown that the N2 pyrazolone position is essential for the cellular activity of this class of compounds. While other factors such as cell membrane penetration may play a role in the activity patterns of some of these compounds, a sufficient degree of evidence has been accumulated to support the hypothesis that the hydrogen bond donating N2-H group is pharmacophoric in these compounds. SAR data have provided further information on the interactions of 5a and its analogues. Steric considerations are of little importance around the pyrazolone N1 area, suggesting a large open pocket or corridor within the target structure. Placement of a benzyl group β to the pyrazolone N1 (5m) enhances its potency, suggesting the presence, within the target, of a hydrophobic pocket, possibly containing aromatic residues. The importance of the N2-H group to participate in hydrogen bond donating interactions with the biological target serves to promote this scaffold as both a lead compound for further therapeutic investigation and as a probe compound to potentially identify the biological target for these compounds.

Supplementary Material

Suppl. Info.

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Institutes of Health (Grant 1R43NS057849), the ALS Association (TREAT program), and the Department of Defense (Grant AL093052) for funding.

Abbreviations

ALS

amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

FALS

familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

SALS

sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

SOD1

Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase 1

References and Notes:

  • 1.Rothstein JD Anal. Neurol 2009, 65 Suppl 1, S3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bensimon G; Lacomblez L; and Meininger VN Engl. J. Med 1994, 330, 585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brown RH Jr.; Robberecht W Semin. Neurol 2001, 21, 131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kerman A; Liu HN; Croul S; Bilbao J; Rogaeva E; Zinman L; Robertson J; Chakrabartty A Acta Neuropathol. 2010, 119, 335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Deng HX; Chen W; Hong ST; Boycott KM; Gorrie GH; Siddique N; Yang Y; Fecto F; Shi Y; Zhai H; Jiang H; Hirano M; Rampersaud E; Jansen GH; Donkervoort S; Bigio EH; Brooks BR; Ajroud K; Sufit RL; Haines JL; Mugnaini E; Pericak-Vance MA; Siddique T Nature 2011, 477, 211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sreedharan J; Blair IP; Tripathi VB; Hu X; Vance C; Rogelj B; Ackerley S; Durnall JC; Williams KL; Buratti E; Baralle F; de Belleroche J; Mitchell JD; Leigh PN; Al-Chalabi A; Miller CC; Nicholson G; Shaw CE Science 2008, 319, 1668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kwiatkowski TJ Jr.; Bosco DA; Leclerc AL; Tamrazian E; Vanderburg CR; Russ C; Davis A; Gilchrist J; Kasarskis EJ; Munsat T; Valdmanis P; Rouleau GA; Hosler BA; Cortelli P; de Jong PJ; Yoshinaga Y; Haines JL; Pericak-Vance MA; Yan J; Ticozzi N; Siddique T; McKenna-Yasek D; Sapp PC; Horvitz HR; Landers JE; Brown RH Jr. Science 2009, 323, 1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Greenway MJ; Andersen PM; Russ C; Ennis S; Cashman S; Donaghy C; Patterson V; Swingler R; Kieran D; Prehn J; Morrison KE; Green A; Acharya KR; Brown RH Jr.; Hardiman O Nat. Genet 2006, 38, 411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen-Plotkin AS, Lee VM-Y; Trojanowski JQ Nat. Rev. Neurol 2010, 6, 211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bruijn LI; Houseweart MK; Kato S; Anderson KL; Anderson SD; Ohama E; Reaume AG; Scott RW; Cleveland DW Science 1998, 281, 1851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pasinelli P; Brown RH Jr. Nat. Rev. Neuro 2006, 7, 710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Haidet-Phillips AM; Hester ME; Miranda CJ; Meyer K; Braun L; Frakes A; Song S; Likhite S; Murtha MJ; Foust KD; Rao M; Eagle A; Kammesheidt A; Christensen A; Mendell JR; Burghes AH; Kaspar BK Nat. Biotechnol 2011, 29, 824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Benmohamed R; Arvanites AC; Kim J; Ferrante RJ; Silverman RB; Morimoto RI; Kirsch DR Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2011, 12, 87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen T; Benmohamed R; Arvanites AC; Ralay Ranaivo H; Morimoto RI; Ferrante RJ; Watterson DM; Kirsch DR; Silverman RB Bioorg. Med. Chem 2011, 19, 613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen T; Benmohamed R; Kim J; Smith K; Amante D; Morimoto RI; Kirsch DR; Ferrante RJ; Silverman RB J. Med. Chem 2012, 55, 515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Muehlebach M; Boeger M; Cederbaum F; Cornes D; Friedmann AA; Glock J; Niderman T; Stoller A; Wagner T Bioorg. Med. Chem 2009, 17, 4241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Porath B; Rademacher P; Boese R; Blaser DZ Naturforsch. 2002, 57 b, 365. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ferguson LN The Modern Structural Theory of Organic Chemistry, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1963, p.128. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang Y; Kirsch DR; Silverman RB Manuscript in preparation.
  • 20.Liu GZ; Xu HW; Chen GW; Wang P; Wang YN; Liu HM; Yu DQ Bioorg. Med. Chem 2010, 18, 1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dieter RK; Pounds SJ Org. Chem 1982, 47, 3174. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Orth R; Bottcher T; Sieber SA Chem. Commun 2010, 46, 8475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Suppl. Info.

RESOURCES