Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2021 May 25;68(8):1272. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-01987-3

In reply: Personal protective equipment penetration performance may be affected by temperature and humidity

Evan Wild 1, Fabricio Zasso 1, Kong Eric You-Ten 1,
PMCID: PMC8169401  PMID: 34033005

To the Editor,

We thank Drs Basaran and Tolu for their comments1 on our letter describing the effects of core temperature and humidity level of the clinical environment on the risk of liquid penetration in surgical gowns.2 Our simulation study was conducted in an operating room environment with a temperature between 20 and 24 °C and humidity of 20–60%, conforming with the guidelines of the Canadian Standards Association.3 Nevertheless, we did not observe any penetration of our liquid medium in any of the gowns (level 2–4) after ten minutes exposure to the liquid medium. Cao at al. showed that elevated ambient/fabric temperature, increased level of humidity, and the type and higher temperature of the liquid are important factors that increase liquid penetration.4 Although we did not measure the exact temperature and humidity in our study, future studies are warranted to investigate the effects of temperature, humidity, and liquid type on the degree of liquid penetration in various levels of surgical gowns, which might have important implications for exposure of aerosolized pathogens to healthcare workers in a variety of clinical environments.

Acknowledgments

Disclosures

None.

Funding statement

None.

Editorial responsibility

This submission was handled by Dr. Stephan K.W. Schwarz, Editor-in-Chief, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d’anesthésie.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References


Articles from Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES