Abstract
Coordinated regulation of stress response pathways is crucial for cellular homeostasis. However, crosstalk between the different stress pathways and the physiological significance of this crosstalk remain poorly understood. In this study, using the model organism C. elegans, we discovered that suppression of the transcription factor LET-607/CREBH, a regulator of cellular defense and proteostatic responses, triggers adaptive induction of DAF-16-dependent stress responses. Suppression of LET-607 improves stress resistance and extends C. elegans lifespan in a DAF-16-dependent manner. We identified the sphingomyelin synthase SMS-5 to be a central mediator in the communication between LET-607 and DAF-16. SMS-5 reduces the contents of unsaturated phosphatidylcholine (PC), which activates DAF-16 through ITR-1-dependent calcium signaling and calcium-sensitive kinase PKC-2. Our data reveal the significance of crosstalk between different stress pathways in animal fitness and identify LET-607/CREBH and specific PC as regulators of DAF-16 and longevity.
Author summary
In order to cope with stresses, cells have evolved complex and elegant adaptive mechanisms, which are also referred to as stress responses. Central to these responses are core transcription factors. It is widely hypothesized that interruption of one key stress response pathway could compromise overall cellular function and survival. In order to avoid such an issue, stress response pathways communicate with each other. A defect in one pathway may adaptively activate other pathways, thus restoring homeostasis and increasing fitness. However, how these pathways communicate is largely unexplored. In this study, we unraveled crosstalk between the LET-607 and DAF-16 pathways in C. elegans. Suppression of LET-607, a regulator of defense and proteostatic responses, was shown to adaptively activate DAF-16, which is a crucial regulator of general stress responses. This crosstalk was shown to be vital for animal fitness, as suppression of LET-607 extends lifespan in a DAF-16-dependent manner. Intriguingly, loss of LET-607 results in increased levels of the sphingomyelin synthase SMS-5, which metabolizes membrane lipid PC. Consequently, the reduction in PC causes activation of DAF-16 via membrane-located calcium channel ITR-1 and calcium-sensitive kinase PKC-2. This study identifies a novel crosstalk between stress response pathways, which is potentially significant in animal longevity.
Introduction
In order to defend against environmental and cellular stresses, animals have evolved complex stress response pathways. Disturbance of these pathways leads to compromised cellular homeostasis and aging [1]. Stress responses typically activate in different parts of the cell, which are controlled by core transcription factors. These transcription factors each regulate a specific subset of genes that enable the cell to cope with compartment-specific stresses. Importantly, many stresses, such as heat and pathogens, can damage several cellular compartments. In order to cope with this, multiple stress response pathways must be activated simultaneously. Notably, Interruption of one stress response pathway could cause deleterious effects on other parts of the cell and as a result influence overall cellular homeostasis [2,3]. Therefore, disturbing one stress pathway may induce adaptive stress responses in other parts of the cell. This hypothesis has been corroborated by recent research investigating the communication between mitochondrial and cytosolic proteostatic response pathways. Specifically, mitochondrial stress has been shown to activate several homeostatic pathways in the cytosol to restore the cellular homeostasis [4–7]. Other than research into proteostatic pathways, little is known about whether and how stress pathways communicate to enable overall cellular homeostasis and animal fitness.
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the main site for protein folding and lipid biosynthesis and a key organelle for cellular stress responses. One such response is the unfolded protein response (UPR), which restores proteostasis upon ER stress [8]. ER-resident transcription factors play a crucial role in ER stress responses. In mammals, CREBH is an ER-bound transcription factor and a member of the CREB3 family. Upon ER-stress, CREBH is activated and transits to the Golgi. It is subsequently cleaved by the proteases, after which the cleaved N-terminal fragment translocates to the nucleus, where it activates downstream target genes [9]. This process is known as regulated intramembrane proteolysis (RIP) [10]. CREBH activation promotes the expression of various inflammatory factors and iron-regulatory hormone hepcidin [9,11]. This links ER stress to cellular defense responses.
In this study, we used model organism C. elegans to study LET-607, the C. elegans ortholog of mammalian CREBH. This investigation revealed crosstalk between LET-607 and the cytosolic DAF-16 stress pathways. We showed that unlike mammalian CREBH, LET-607 is located in the nucleus and not on the ER. However, LET-607 regulates cellular defense genes as well as UPR genes like CREBH, thus indicating their functions may be conserved. In addition, suppression of LET-607 induces an adaptive activation of DAF-16, which is a master regulator of cytosolic stress responses in C. elegans. This activation results in improved animal health and longevity. We further uncovered the underlying mechanism of this crosstalk, involving the sphingomyelin synthase SMS-5, the membrane lipid PC, the ER-resident calcium channel inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (ITR-1) and the calcium-dependent kinase PKC-2. Together, these results delineate a cellular mechanism linking different stress response pathways and highlight its importance in animal longevity.
Results
LET-607 regulates multiple stress responses
Previously, we showed that constant activation of defense responses promotes C. elegans longevity [12]. In order to identify additional defense regulators, RNAi screening of the C. elegans transcription factor library was performed using the immune reporter T24B8.5p::GFP [13]. This identified let-607 as a positive regulator of T24B8.5p::GFP (Fig 1A), which is consistent with the role of mammalian CREBH in innate immunity [9]. let-607 RNAi arrested the development of C. elegans. In order to ensure animal development into adult, diluted let-607 RNAi (1:5) was used. This reduced the let-607 mRNA levels by about 75% (S1A Fig).
The mRNA expression of let-607 is induced by ER stress [14], however its physiological functions in C. elegans remain largely unknown. Via the construction of a GFP-fused translational reporter LET-607::GFP, it was unexpectedly determined that LET-607 mainly localized in the nucleus, not on the ER membrane (Fig 1B). We further examined the colocalization of LET-607::GFP with DIS-3::mCHERRY. DIS-3 is a component of C. elegans nuclear RNA exosome complex that is enriched in the nucleoplasm but not in the nucleoli [15]. It was identified that LET-607::GFP overlapped well with DIS-3:: mCHERRY specifically in the nucleoplasm (Fig 1B). Protein sequence analysis showed that there was 40% homology between the transmembrane domains of LET-607 and CREBH (S1B Fig). These domains are critical for ER localization and differences in these domains may explain the nuclear localization of LET-607. This finding is also consistent with the localization of the Drosophila ortholog of CREBH, which lacks a transmembrane domain [16].
Next, the function of LET-607 was examined by collecting control RNAi and let-607 RNAi-treated worms for RNA-sequencing analysis. This identified 860 genes regulated by LET-607, of which 316 were upregulated and 544 were downregulated (S1 Table). Genes which were decreased by let-607 RNAi were classified as upregulated by LET-607. Functional analysis revealed these genes were enriched in immune and detoxification responses (Fig 1C). These upregulated genes included C-type lectins and innate immunity genes, which are known to play a key role in pathogen defenses. These findings are again consistent with the function of mammalian CREBH. In addition, cytochrome P450, which mediates detoxification response, and peptidases, which are critical for cellular proteostasis, were also upregulated. Intriguingly, as shown in S1 Table, the basal expression of the classic ER UPR genes, including hsp-3 and hsp-4, was not significantly affected by let-607 RNAi. However, ER stress-induced HSP-4 activation was suppressed by let-607 RNAi (S1C Fig). This is in line with a previous finding suggesting that LET-607 binds to the promoter of hsp-4 [17]. Together, these results indicate that LET-607 positively regulates genes involved in multiple stress responses, specifically the defense and proteostatic responses. This suggests LET-607 functions are in some part conserved with mammalian CREBH.
Next, the association between the identified genes and altered stress resistance was assessed. The stresses tested included Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14-induced pathogen stress, tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP)-induced xenobiotic stress, 35°C heat stress and dithiothreitol (DTT)-induced ER stress. Unexpectedly, although LET-607 positively regulated stress response genes, let-607 RNAi increased C. elegans survival in response to all of the stresses tested (Fig 1D–1G), suggesting that let-607 knockdown increases the fitness of C. elegans upon stress. In addition, TBHP and heat stress were used to test tissue specificity. It was identified that intestine-specific let-607 RNAi improved animal stress resistance, whereas other tissue-specific RNAis (specifically germline, muscle and hypodermis) had no such effects (S1D–S1K Fig). As stress resistance is known to contribute to longevity [18], animal lifespan was measured. It was observed that let-607 RNAi indeed significantly extended C. elegans lifespan (Fig 1H). Since let-607 RNAi compromised animal development, the effects of post-developmental RNAi were also tested. The results showed that post-developmental treatment of let-607 RNAi could still enhance stress resistance and extend lifespan (S1L–S1N Fig), suggesting that the effects of LET-607 in development and longevity may represent antagonistic pleiotropy. These data suggest that LET-607 negatively regulates animal stress resistance and longevity. Since stress resistance is determined by the outcome of multiple stress response pathways, we hypothesized that let-607 RNAi might adaptively activate other pathways that together account for the enhanced stress resistance and longevity.
LET-607 suppression activates stress response factor DAF-16
Previous studies have reported that pathogen resistance in C. elegans is governed by several cytosolic transcription factors including DAF-16 [19], HSF-1 [20] and SKN-1 [21,22]. Heat shock response is also controlled by HSF-1. Previously, let-607 RNAi was shown to promote the expression of HSF-1 targets [23]. We speculated that let-607 RNAi might activate the aforementioned factors and therefore enhance stress resistance. The results showed that the expression of the DAF-16 reporter MTL-1::GFP (Fig 2A) and the HSF-1 reporter hsp-16.2p::GFP [24] (S2A Fig) was increased by let-607 RNAi. Contrastingly, the SKN-1 reporter gst-4p::GFP [25] was unaffected (S2B Fig).
We focused on DAF-16 in the following study. The induction of DAF-16 target genes was confirmed via use of another reporter, sod-3p::GFP (S2C Fig), and via sod-3 mRNA expression (Fig 2B). The mRNA levels of daf-16 were unchanged by let-607 RNAi (Fig 2B). Upon activation, DAF-16 translocates to the nucleus. Indeed, enhanced nuclear occupancy of DAF-16 in let-607 RNAi-treated worms was observed (Fig 2C). These findings suggest that suppression of LET-607 activates the cytosolic stress response factor DAF-16. As LET-607/CREBH could respond to ER stress [9,14] and regulate ER UPR genes [9] (S1C Fig), we further tested whether suppression of the classic ER stress response pathways could also activate DAF-16. This was investigated using RNAi of the ER UPR genes (ire-1, pek-1 and atf-6). We found that despite suppressing downstream UPR genes as expected (S2D Fig), these RNAi did not affect MTL-1::GFP expression (Fig 2D). This suggests that suppression of LET-607 activates DAF-16 in a manner independent of ER UPR. Mammalian CREBH could be regulated by the core clock oscillator BMAL1 and glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) [26]. However, knockdowns of the orthologs of these genes (aha-1 and gsk-3) (S2E Fig) had no significant effects on MTL-1::GFP expression (S2F and S2G Fig), suggesting these genes may not be involved in DAF-16-induction. This is likely because of the nuclear localization of LET-607, whereas BMAL1 and GSK3β regulate ER-to-Golgi transport and subsequent proteolytic cleavage of CREBH [26]. In addition, PPARα has been reported to interact with CREBH to regulate target genes [27]. In this study, mutation of nhr-49, the functional ortholog of pparα, only marginally induced MTL-1::GFP expression in both control RNAi and let-607 RNAi-treated animals (S2H Fig), suggesting NHR-49 is not involved in LET-607-mediated regulation of DAF-16.
Next, we predicted that let-607 RNAi may also activate DAF-16-dependent stress response genes. Previously, a study classified DAF-16 responsive genes as 1,663 DAF-16-positive targets (class I) and 1,733 DAF-16-negative targets (class II) [28]. The identified let-607 RNAi-induced genes were compared with the DAF-16 class I targets, and it was observed that 74 genes upregulated by let-607 RNAi (13.6%) belonged to the DAF-16 class I targets (S1 Table). This percentage is significantly greater than what would be expected by chance (Fig 2E). This further supports the hypothesis that let-607 RNAi regulates DAF-16. Weicksel et al. used ChIP-seq analysis to identify genes possessing LET-607 binding sites within promoter regions. Here, we compared the above 74 overlapped genes with their findings and found only one gene contained LET-607 binding sites, suggesting LET-607 does not regulate these genes directly and likely functions via DAF-16. In addition, Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of the biological process revealed that these overlapped genes were enriched in several categories, including multiple stress responses, oxidation-reduction and lifespan determination (Fig 2F), consistent with the phenotype of the let-607 knockdown. The adaptive induction of the DAF-16 downstream stress response genes may be the underlying mechanism conferring enhanced stress resistance in let-607 RNAi-treated animals.
LET-607 regulates stress resistance and longevity via DAF-16
Next, the role of DAF-16 in enhanced stress resistance was investigated in the let-607 RNAi-treated animals. Mutation of daf-16 abrogated or at least partially suppressed animal resistance to pathogenic and xenobiotic stresses (Fig 3A and 3B). However, in the case of hsf-1 mutant animals, let-607 RNAi enhanced the survival in the presence of these two stresses (S3A and S3B Fig). This suggests that resistance to pathogenic and xenobiotic stresses requires DAF-16. Contrastingly, enhanced heat stress resistance did not require DAF-16 (S3C Fig) but was in fact partially dependent on HSF-1 (S3D Fig). In summary, these data imply that in let-607 knockdown animals, DAF-16 is mainly responsible for the defense response while HSF-1 contributes to the proteostatic response. This supports the notion that adaptive activation of other stress response pathways contributes to the enhanced stress resistance.
As DAF-16 is a crucial regulator of longevity, we further examined the role of DAF-16 induction in this process. As expected, the extended lifespan of let-607 RNAi-treated worms was largely abolished by a loss-of-function mutation of daf-16 (Fig 3C). Previous studies have shown that DAF-16 is essential for the longevity of some well-known long-lived models, including the insulin/IGF receptor daf-2 mutants [29–31] and germline-less glp-1 mutants [32,33]. In this study, we identified that let-607 knockdown further increased the lifespan of daf-2 mutants (S3E Fig), but failed to influence the lifespan of glp-1 mutants (Fig 3D), suggesting that the mechanisms conferring lifespan extension in let-607 knockdown and germline-deficient models are shared. Next, the impact of let-607 knockdown on reproductivity was investigated. The numbers of progeny were found to be significantly reduced (S3F Fig), consistent with a previous report [17]. However, genes critical for longevity in germline-deficient mutants, including daf-9, daf-12, tcer-1 and kri-1 [33–35], were dispensable for lifespan extension in let-607 RNAi animals (Fig 3E–3H), suggesting that let-607 knockdown does not promote longevity via activation of the germline pathway.
The sphingomyelin synthase SMS-5 mediates DAF-16 activation
Using RNAi screening of the LET-607-regulated genes identified in RNA-seq analysis, we further explored the specific mechanism of DAF-16 activation. This identified C. elegans sphingomyelin synthase SMS-5 as a new regulator of DAF-16. sms-5 RNAi (S4A Fig) inhibited the activation of MTL-1::GFP upon let-607 knockdown (Fig 4A). sms-5 mRNA levels were upregulated by let-607 RNAi (Fig 4B). Nuclear localization of DAF-16::GFP, xenobiotic stress resistance and lifespan extension induced by let-607 RNAi were either inhibited or partially weakened via sms-5 RNAi (Figs 4C, S4B and S4C), suggesting SMS-5 is required for DAF-16 induction.
Sphingomyelin synthase catalyzes the production of diacylglycerol (DAG) and sphingomyelin at the expense of ceramide and PC (S4D Fig). We hypothesized that one of these membrane lipids might cause activation of DAF-16. In order to test this hypothesis, we first examined ceramides, which are key lipid signaling molecules in multiple cellular processes. Supplementation of ceramides with various acyl chains did not affect the expression of MTL-1::GFP induced by let-607 RNAi (S4E Fig), suggesting that ceramide is not likely to be involved in DAF-16 induction.
We next tested whether the consumption of PC by SMS-5 might activate DAF-16. Dietary supplementation of choline, a metabolic precursor for PC, suppressed the expression of MTL-1::GFP upon let-607 knockdown (Fig 4D). In C. elegans, PC is synthesized in a variety of ways including from choline (via the Kennedy pathway) or via the action of SAMS-1 and PMT-1/PMT-2-mediated sequential methylation from phosphoethanolamine (S5A Fig). We next asked whether PC reduction was sufficient to activate DAF-16 by silencing the genes required for PC synthesis. However, RNAi knockdown of PC biosynthetic genes, including sams-1, pmt-2, ckb-1, pcyt-1 and cept-1 (S5B Fig), did not cause any significant changes in MTL-1::GFP expression (Figs 4E and S5C). Subsequently, we investigated the synergetic effects of let-607 and PC biosynthetic genes. The combined knockdown of let-607 and PC synthetic genes via double RNAi (S5B Fig) synergistically activated MTL-1::GFP (Figs 4E and S5C), suggesting that PC reduction participates in the activation of DAF-16. It was also noted that the expression of PC biosynthetic genes was reduced after let-607 RNAi (S5B Fig), further suggesting that let-607 knockdown may suppress PC production. These data are consistent with a model that reduction of PC is essential for DAF-16 activation in response to let-607 knockdown.
LET-607 regulates PC metabolism
As it was established that LET-607 regulates DAF-16 via PC, we investigated the function of LET-607 in lipid metabolism. Using GC-MS/MS, a decrease in variety of fatty acid species was identified after let-607 RNAi (Fig 5A), which resulted in a decline in the overall concentrations of both saturated and unsaturated fatty acids (S6A Fig). Fittingly, triglyceride contents were also decreased in let-607 RNAi worms (S6B Fig). We next examined the membrane lipid PC and found that let-607 RNAi significantly decreased PC contents (Fig 5B), which was mostly attributed to the reduction of unsaturated PC (Fig 5C). Other major membrane phospholipids were also examined. Phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylserine (PS) were shown to not be significantly affected, whereas the levels of phosphatidylinositol (PI), especially unsaturated PI, were greatly reduced (Fig 5B and 5C). The PC/PE ratio, which influences membrane fluidity and curvature, was found to not change significantly in let-607 RNAi-treated animals (S6C Fig).
Further analysis of the fatty acid composition of PC revealed that the levels of numerous unsaturated fatty acids in PC were indeed greatly reduced (Fig 5D). As a control, most unsaturated fatty acids in PE fraction showed no significant changes (Fig 5D), again supporting the importance of LET-607 in PC regulation. As unsaturated PC was significantly reduced by let-607 knockdown, worms treated with let-607 RNAi were directly supplemented with unsaturated PC (18:1n9). This supplementation suppressed the induction of MTL-1::GFP (Fig 5E and 5F), which phenocopied the sms-5 RNAi and suggest unsaturated PC could indeed regulate DAF-16.
PC mediates DAF-16 activation in germline-deficient mutants
Having established SMS-5 and PC reduction as mediators of DAF-16 activation, our next question was whether they are generally required for DAF-16 activation in other models, including daf-2 mutants, glp-1 mutants, heat stress and oxidative stress. Supplementation of unsaturated PC (18:1n9) partially suppressed MTL-1::GFP induction specifically in glp-1 mutants (Fig 6A). This was not the case for daf-2 mutants (Fig 6B), or worms subjected to heat stress (Fig 6C) or oxidative stress (Fig 6D). Similar results were also observed for the nuclear occupancy of DAF-16 in glp-1 and daf-2 mutants (S7A and S7B Fig), suggesting that PC specifically mediates DAF-16 activation in germline-deficient mutants. This is consistent with the lifespan data (Fig 3D). As for sms-5, it was determined that its RNAi had no significant impact on MTL-1::GFP induction in any of the long-lived models (Fig 6E and 6F) or under stressed conditions (Fig 6G and 6H). This suggests that in glp-1 mutants, SMS-5 does not control PC metabolism and other mechanisms are at play.
LET-607 regulates DAF-16 via calcium signaling
PC is one of the most abundant membrane lipids and has significant influence on the membrane proteins. PC composition influences membrane properties that in turn alter the functions of the membrane proteins, such as the ER membrane-located proteins [36,37]. We therefore speculated that some membrane proteins mediate the activation of DAF-16. The ER-located calcium channel and calcium homeostasis are regulated by alterations in PC contents [37]. What’s more, calcium has been reported to regulate DAF-16 activity [38]. Thus, we asked whether DAF-16 induction requires the ER-resident calcium channels. The role of sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) is to pump calcium into the ER from the cytosol. Conversely, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) receptor releases calcium from the ER to the cytosol. In C. elegans, SERCA and the IP3 receptor are encoded by sca-1 and itr-1, respectively. We found that itr-1 RNAi (S8A Fig) largely abrogated MTL-1::GFP activation upon let-607 knockdown (Fig 7A). Furthermore, a loss-of-function mutation of itr-1, which results in defects in ER-derived calcium signaling, was found to significantly reduce the enhanced stress resistance (Fig 7B) and extended lifespan (Fig 7C) of let-607 RNAi-treated animals. We also examined the effect of egl-8 RNAi, which compromises ITR-1-dependent calcium signaling through the reduction of the ITR-1 ligand IP3. The results showed that egl-8 knockdown (S8B Fig) completely abrogated the effects of let-607 RNAi on MTL-1::GFP expression (S8C Fig) and xenobiotic stress resistance (S8D Fig), which phenocopied itr-1 mutation. These data suggest that LET-607-mediated DAF-16 activation requires the ITR-1 calcium channel.
As for sca-1 RNAi (S8E Fig), we found that it increased MTL-1::GFP intensity, and importantly, sca-1 RNAi restored MTL-1::GFP expression with sms-5 RNAi (Fig 7D), indicating that the calcium signal acts downstream of SMS-5. Similarly, the addition of ionomycin, which is a calcium ionophore that induces intracellular calcium flux, restored the expression of MTL-1::GFP in response to sms-5 RNAi (S8F Fig).
Calcium has been reported to regulate DAF-16 activity via calcium-sensitive kinase PKC-2 and the downstream kinase SGK-1 [38]. In line with this, both pkc-2 RNAi (S8G Fig) and sgk-1 mutation abolished the enhanced MTL-1::GFP expression in let-607 RNAi-treated worms (Fig 7E and 7F). Accordingly, sgk-1 inhibition also suppressed the stress resistance (S8H Fig) and longevity (Fig 7G) observed upon let-607 knockdown. We also tested mutation of rict-1, a TORC2 component and well-recognized upstream regulator of sgk-1 in C. elegans [39,40]. Unlike sgk-1, it did not suppress MTL-1::GFP induction in let-607 RNAi-treated worms (S8I Fig), suggesting TORC2 is not involved. DAF-16 can also be phosphorylated and suppressed by AKT [32,41]. Consistently, akt-1;akt-2(RNAi) enhanced MTL-1::GFP expression. They did however have similar effects in both wild type and let-607 RNAi animals (S8J Fig), suggesting that AKT is not relevant to LET-607-mediated DAF-16 activation. Together, these data suggest that let-607 RNAi-mediated DAF-16 activation requires PKC-2 and SGK-1 kinases.
Discussion
This study unraveled crosstalk between LET-607 and DAF-16 stress response pathways. This crosstalk is important for animal fitness, as evidenced by the enhanced stress resistance and extended lifespan. Furthermore, this crosstalk was shown to be regulated via SMS-5-mediated reduction of PC, which modulates the DAF-16 pathway through ITR-1-dependent calcium signaling and downstream kinases PKC-2 and SGK-1 (Fig 8).
DAF-16 induction is specific for LET-607, but not for classic ER UPR factors IRE-1, PEK-1 and ATF-6. The function of mammalian CREBH is to regulate the inflammatory genes and hormone hepcidin [9,11]. Our study revealed that C. elegans LET-607 induces several important defense genes such as C-type lectins and cytochrome P450. These findings together suggest a critical role for LET-607/CREBH in promoting cellular defense responses against pathogens and xenobiotic molecules. Importantly, DAF-16 is a major transcription factor in C. elegans, which controls various responses including detoxification and pathogen responses [19,28,42]. This is in accordance with the adaptive activation of DAF-16 when LET-607 is compromised.
The ER plays a central role in coordinating cellular stress responses. ER stress can initiate multiple defensive or homeostatic processes aimed at restoring function of not only the ER but also the whole cell. Key mediators linking the ER and other parts of the cell are the ER stress-responsive proteins, which include the classic ER UPR factors (IRE1, PERK and ATF6) and CREBH/LET-607 [3,43,44]. It is plausible that when these ER stress response factors are compromised, adaptive responses are triggered across the cell to restore homeostasis. Although LET-607 is localized in the nucleus, it is regulated by ER stress [14]. And the function of LET-607/CREBH appears to be much conserved, with a key role being to control the immune-related gene expression. The communication between LET-607 and DAF-16 may be an adaptive response specifically compensating for compromised LET-607-mediated ER stress response. Further studies are required to identify the components of the LET-607-dependent ER stress response pathway.
Previous studies have shown that CREBH plays a crucial role in glucose and lipid metabolism [44,45]. This study identified previously unknown functions of LET-607, namely in the metabolism of membrane lipids. We hypothesize that LET-607 may respond to membrane lipid disturbance and may play a role in the maintenance of membrane homeostasis. This idea warrants further study. This study also found that LET-607 regulates SMS-5, which works to decrease the ceramide contents and increase the levels of DAG and sphingomyelin. These membrane lipids are critical mediators of multiple cellular processes, implying that LET-607 may have a broader role in metabolic and cellular homeostasis.
DAF-16 induction and longevity are regulated by SMS-5 and the membrane lipid PC. The central roles of membrane lipids in animal aging are only beginning to emerge. Studies in humans as well as model organisms have revealed that aging is associated with significant changes in multiple membrane lipid classes [46]. Specifically, the contents of many PC species have been found to increase with the animal aging progress [47,48], which is consistent with our observation that the reduction of PC is beneficial for animal health. It is not yet fully understood how PC regulates the aging process. This study showed that DAF-16 activation is mediated by the ER-resident calcium channel ITR-1. Specific PC may act by directly affecting the function of ITR-1 or by changing membrane properties. Further studies are required to elucidate the underlying mechanism.
In summary, the present study uncovered a new cross-communication between stress response pathways and identified novel regulators of animal aging. Given the conservation of proteins and lipids identified, similar mechanisms of cellular homeostasis and longevity may be present in other species like mammals.
Materials and methods
C. elegans strains and maintenance
C. elegans were cultured on standard nematode growth medium (NGM) seeded with E. coli OP50-1 [49]. The following strains were provided by Caenorhabditis Genome Center: The wild-type N2, AU78 [T24B8.5p::gfp::unc-54-3’ UTR], CL2166[gst-4p::gfp], CF1553[sod-3p::gfp], TJ375[hsp-16.2p::gfp], TJ356 [daf-16p::daf-16a/b::gfp], CF1038[daf-16(mu86)], CB1370[daf-2(e1370)], CB4037[glp-1(e2141)], JT73[itr-1(sa73)], VP303[rde-1(ne219); kbIs7(nhx-2p::rde-1)], WM118[rde-1(ne300); neIs9(myo-3::ha::rde-1)] and NR222[rde-1(ne219); kzIs9(lin-26p::rde-1)], MGH30[sgk-1(mg455)], MGH266[rict-1(mg451)], BQ1[akt-1(mg306)], AA18[daf-12(rh61rh412)], RG1228[daf-9(rh50)], CF2167[tcer-1(tm1452)], F2052[kri-1(ok1251)]. The Strain DCL569 [rde-1(mkc36); mkcSi13(sun-1p::rde-1::sun-1 3’UTR)] was provided by Dr. Di Chen. The strain containing dis-3::mcherry was provided by Dr. Shouhong Guang. The strain SSP171[mtl-1::gfp] was generated by our own lab [50]. The strain SSP172[let-607p::let-607::gfp] was generated by cloning the 2.2kb promoter region and the full length of let-607 genomic DNA into pPD95.79 plasmid that was injected into gonad by standard techniques.
Microbe strains and RNA interference treatment
E. coli OP50-1 bacteria were cultured overnight at 37°C in LB, after which 150ul of bacterial culture were seeded on 60mm NGM plates. For RNAi experiment, HT115 bacteria containing specific dsRNA-expression plasmids (Ahringer library) [51] were cultured overnight at 37°C in LB containing 100ug/ml carbenicillin, and seeded onto NGM plates containing 5mM IPTG [52].
RNAi was induced at room temperature for 24 hours after seeding. Then, synchronized L1 worms were added to RNAi plates to knock down indicated genes. For let-607 RNAi treatments, the bacterial cultures of target RNAi strains were diluted with the vector control at the ratios of 1:5.
qRT-PCR
qRT-PCR was performed as previously described [53]. Briefly, L4 stage worms were collected, washed in M9 buffer and then homogenized in Trizol reagent (Life Technologies). RNAs were extracted according to the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA contamination was digested with DNase I (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and RNA was subsequently reverse-transcribed to cDNA by using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Quantitative PCR was performed using SYBR Green (Bio-Rad). The expression of snb-1 was used to normalize samples.
Lifespan analysis
Lifespan assays were performed as previously described [12]. Briefly, synchronized L1 worms were added to NGM plates seeded with indicated RNAi strains. Lifespan analysis was performed at 20°C, except for experiments involving glp-1 mutants, which were kept at 25°C from L1 to day 1 adult, and shifted to 20°C thereafter. Worms were transferred every day during reproductive period. Worms that died of vulva burst, bagging or crawling off the plates were censored.
Stress resistance assays
For TBHP (Sigma) resistance, day 1 adult worms were transferred to NGM plates supplemented with 10mM TBHP and incubated at 20°C for survival analysis. For pathogen resistance, late L4 worms were transferred to plates containing pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 and maintained at 25°C for survival analysis. For heat shock resistance, day 1 adult worms were incubated at 35°C for survival analysis. For DTT resistance, day 1 adult worms were transferred to NGM plates supplemented with 8.5mM DTT and incubated at 20°C for survival analysis.
Fluorescent microscopy
To analyze GFP expression, worms were paralyzed with 2mM levamisole and fluorescent microscopic images were taken after mounted on slides. To study the DAF-16 nuclear localization, the levels of GFP nuclear localization were scored. Briefly, no nuclear GFP, GFP signal in the nucleus of anterior or posterior intestine cells and nuclear GFP in all intestinal cells are categorized as low, medium and high expression, respectively.
RNA sequencing analysis
Total RNA from L4 stage worms was extracted using TRIzol reagent and used to generate sequencing libraries using the VAHTS Stranded mRNA-seq Library Prep Kit for Illumina. The quality and quantity of the libraries were determined using an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, USA) and ND-2000 (NanoDrop Technologies, USA), respectively. Only high-quality RNA samples (OD260/280 = 1.8~2.2, OD260/230≥2.0, RIN≥6.5, 28S:18S≥1.0, >10μg) were used to construct sequencing library. The libraries were sequenced at a paired-end 150 bp read length on an Illumina HiseqX Ten. RNA-seq reads were aligned to the reference genome WBcel235 using Tophat v.2.0.6[54]. The differential gene and transcript expression analysis was performed using Cufflinks tools [55–57]. Genes with a fold change of > 2 (either up or down) and FDR of < 0.1 were considered as differentially regulated genes. Genes functional classification and GO term analysis were conducted by using Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) version 6.8 [58]. For Genes functional classification, DAVID groups genes with similar annotation terms. Subsequently, the geometric mean (in -log scale) of EASE scores (p-value) of all terms in each group was calculated as enrichment score. The RNA sequencing data have been deposited in the GEO with an accession number of GSE155935.
Fatty acid quantification
Fatty acid contents were measured as previously described [50,59]. 20,000 age-synchronized L4 worms were washed off plates and washed three times with water. Worm pellets were resuspended with 1.2 mL 2.5% H2SO4 in methanol and incubated at 80°C for 1 hour. Then, 1ml supernatants were mixed with 1.2 ml hexane and 1.8 ml water to extract fatty acid methyl esters for GC-MS/MS analysis. The Supelco 37 Component FAME Mix (Sigma Aldrich) was used to determine the retention time. The Shimadzu GCMS-TQ8040 Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer equipped with a SH-Rxi-5sil MS column was used. Fatty acid contents were normalized to protein concentrations.
Membrane lipid quantification
Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed as previously described [59,60] with modifications. 50,000 L4 worms were collected and washed with M9 to remove bacteria, and were sonicated in 0.25 mL PBS. Then, 5 mL mixture of ice-cold chloroform:methanol (1:1) was added and mixed immediately. The solution was incubated overnight at -20°C with occasional shaking to extract lipids. After incubation, 2.2 mL Hajra’s solution (0.2M H3PO4; 1M KCl) was added. The lower lipid containing organic phase was recovered by centrifuging for 1 minute at 3,000 rpm. Lipids were dried under nitrogen and resuspended in chloroform for TLC separation.
The silica gel TLC plate was activated by incubating at 110°C for 75 minutes. Samples were loaded onto the TLC plate alongside lipid standards. The plate was run with a chloroform:methanol:water:acetic acid solvent mixture (65:43:3:2.5) until the solvent front was three quarters of the way up the plate. The plate was subsequently dried and run with a new solvent mixture of hexane:diethyl ether:acetic acid (80:20:2) until the solvent front reached the top of the plate. The plates were sprayed with 0.005% primuline and visualized under UV light. Spots corresponding to the major phospholipids were scraped to tube and resuspended in 2.5% H2SO4 in methanol. Spots were incubated for 1 hour at 80°C to create FAMEs for GC-MS/MS analysis. An internal standard of 50 μg of tridecanoic acid was added to each tube.
Lipid supplementation
For treatment with ceramides, ceramides with various side chains were dissolved in ethanol to make 0.5 mg/mL stock solutions; 25 μg of each ceramide was added to the surface of NGM plates before bacterial seeding. For supplementation with PC, unsaturated PC were dissolved in DMSO to make 17 mM stock solutions; 51 nmol of each was added to the surface of NGM plates.
Quantification and statistical analysis
Data were presented as mean ± SEM. Survival data were analyzed by using a log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. The nuclear accumulation of DAF-16::GFP was analyzed by using a Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test. Figs 1A, 2A, S3F and S6C were analyzed by using an unpaired student t-test. Figs 4B, S1A and S6B were analyzed by using a paired student t-test. Figs 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D and S6A were analyzed by using a multiple t-test followed by a Holm-Sidak post hoc test. Fig 2D was analyzed by using a One-way ANOVA. Other figures were analyzed by using Two-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey post hoc test. For Fig 2E, statistical significance of the overlap between two groups of genes was analyzed by using an online software provided by Jim Lund (http://nemates.org/MA/progs/overlap_stats.html). The probability (p) of finding an overlap of x genes are calculated, the statistical detail of which can be found at: http://nemates.org/MA/progs/representation.stats.html. P < 0.05 was considered as significant.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank CGC, Dr. Di Chen and Dr. Shouhong Guang for providing strains. We thank Qin Deng and Guocan Zheng in Analytic and Testing Center of Chongqing University for the use of facility and technical support.
Data Availability
The RNA sequencing data have been deposited in the GEO with an accession number of GSE155935. Other data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 32070754, 31701017 to H.T. and grant No. 31771337, 32071163 to S. P.), Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China (grant No. cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0714 to H.T.) and Chongqing Talents Plan for Young Talents (CQYC201905071 to S.P.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Haigis MC, Yankner BA. The Aging Stress Response. Mol Cell. 2010;40: 333–344. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.10.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mottis A, Herzig S, Auwerx J. Mitocellular communication: Shaping health and disease. Science. 2019;366: 827–832. 10.1126/science.aax3768 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Senft D, Ronai ZA. UPR, autophagy, and mitochondria crosstalk underlies the ER stress response. Trends Biochem Sci. 2015;40: 141–148. 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang X, Chen XJ. A cytosolic network suppressing mitochondria-mediated proteostatic stress and cell death. Nature. 2015;524: 481–484. 10.1038/nature14859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wrobel L, Topf U, Bragoszewski P, Wiese S, Sztolsztener ME, Oeljeklaus S, et al. Mistargeted mitochondrial proteins activate a proteostatic response in the cytosol. Nature. 2015;524: 485–488. 10.1038/nature14951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kim H, Grant AR, Simic MS, Kapernick E, Wolff S, Dillin A, et al. Lipid Biosynthesis Coordinates a Mitochondrial-to- Cytosolic Stress Response. Cell. 2016;166: 1539–1552. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.D’Amico D, Sorrentino V, Auwerx J. Cytosolic Proteostasis Networks of the Mitochondrial Stress Response. Trends Biochem Sci. 2017;42: 712–725. 10.1016/j.tibs.2017.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hetz C. The unfolded protein response: Controlling cell fate decisions under ER stress and beyond. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13: 89–102. 10.1038/nrm3270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang K, Shen X, Wu J, Sakaki K, Saunders T, Rutkowski DT, et al. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Activates Cleavage of CREBH to Induce a Systemic Inflammatory Response. Cell. 2006;124: 587–599. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Brown MS, Ye J, Rawson RB, Goldstein JL. Regulated Intramembrane Proteolysiss: A Control Mechanism Conserved from Bacteria to Humans. Cell. 2000;100: 391–398. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80675-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vecchi chiara, Montosi G, Zhang K, Lamberti I, Duncan SA, Kaufman RJ, et al. ER Stress Controls Iron Metabolism Through Induction of Hepcidin. Science. 2009;325: 877–880. 10.1126/science.1176639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhou L, He B, Deng J, Pang S, Tang H. Histone acetylation promotes long-lasting defense responses and longevity following early life heat stress. PLoS Genet. 2019;15: e1008122. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shivers RP, Kooistra T, Chu SW, Pagano DJ, Kim DH. Tissue-specific activities of an immune signaling module regulate physiological responses to pathogenic and nutritional bacteria in C. elegans. Cell Host Microbe. 2009;6: 321–30. 10.1016/j.chom.2009.09.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shen X, Ellis RE, Sakaki K, Kaisfman RJ. Genetic interactions due to constitutive inducible gene regulation mediated by the unfolded protein in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 2005;1: e37. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liao S, Chen X, Xu T, Jie Q, Xu Z, Xu D, et al. Co-surveillance of ribosomal RNA by the exosome complex and nucleolar RNAi in C. elegans. bioRxiv. 2020; 395020. 10.1101/2020.11.23.395020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barbosa S, Fasanella G, Carreira S, Llarena M, Fox R, Barreca C, et al. An Orchestrated Program Regulating Secretory Pathway Genes and Cargos by the Transmembrane Transcription Factor CREB-H. Traffic. 2013;14: 382–398. 10.1111/tra.12038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Weicksel SE, Mahadav A, Moyle M, Cipriani PG, Kudron M, Pincus Z, et al. A novel small molecule that disrupts a key event during the oocyte-to-embryo transition in C. elegans. Development. 2016;143: 3540–3548. 10.1242/dev.140046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kourtis N, Tavernarakis N. Cellular stress response pathways and ageing: Intricate molecular relationships. EMBO J. 2011;30: 2520–2531. 10.1038/emboj.2011.162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Troemel ER, Chu SW, Reinke V, Lee SS, Ausubel FM, Kim DH. p38 MAPK regulates expression of immune response genes and contributes to longevity in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 2006;2: e183. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Singh V, Aballay A. Heat-shock transcription factor (HSF)-1 pathway required for Caenorhabditis elegans immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103: 13092–13097. 10.1073/pnas.0604050103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hoeven R Van Der, McCallum KC, Cruz MR, Garsin DA. Ce-Duox1/BLI-3 generated reactive oxygen species trigger protective SKN-1 activity via p38 MAPK signaling during infection in C. elegans. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7: e1002453. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Papp D, Csermely P, Soti C. A role for SKN-1/Nrf in pathogen resistance and immunosenescence in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8: e1002673. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Silva MC, Fox S, Beam M, Thakkar H, Amaral MD, Morimoto RI. A genetic screening strategy identifies novel regulators of the proteostasis network. PLoS Genet. 2011;7: e1002438. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rea SL, Wu D, Cypser JR, Vaupel JW, Johnson TE. A stress-sensitive reporter predicts longevity in isogenic populations of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Genet. 2005;37: 894–898. 10.1038/ng1608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Leiers B, Kampkötter A, Grevelding CG, Link CD, Johnson TE, Henkle-Dührsen K. A stress-responsive glutathione S-transferase confers resistance to oxidative stress in Caenorhabditis elegans. Free Radic Biol Med. 2003;34: 1405–1415. 10.1016/s0891-5849(03)00102-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zheng Z, Kim H, Qiu Y, Chen X, Mendez R, Dandekar A, et al. CREBH couples circadian clock with hepatic lipid metabolism. Diabetes. 2016;65: 3369–3383. 10.2337/db16-0298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kim H, Mendez R, Zheng Z, Chang L, Cai J, Zhang R, et al. Liver-enriched transcription factor CREBH interacts with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α to regulate metabolic hormone FGF21. Endocrinology. 2014;155: 769–782. 10.1210/en.2013-1490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tepper RG, Ashraf J, Kaletsky R, Kleemann G, Murphy CT, Bussemaker HJ. PQM-1 Complements DAF-16 as a Key Transcriptional Regulator of DAF-2-Mediated Development and Longevity. Cell. 2013;154: 676–690. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kenyon CJ, Chang J, Gensch E, Runder A, Tabtlang R. A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type. Nature. 1993;366: 461–464. 10.1038/366461a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lin K, Dorman JB, Rodan A, Kenyon C. daf-16: An HNF-3/forkhead Family Member That Can Function to Double the Life-Span of Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 1997;278: 1319–1322. 10.1126/science.278.5341.1319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ogg S, Paradis S, Gottlieb S, Patterson GI, Lee L, Tissenbaum H a, et al. The Fork head transcription factor DAF-16 transduces insulin-like metabolic and longevity signals in C. elegans. Nature. 1997;389: 994–999. 10.1038/40194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lin K, Hsin H, Libina N, Kenyon C. Regulation of the Caenorhabditis elegans longevity protein DAF-16 by insulin/IGF-1 and germline signaling. Nat Genet. 2001;28: 139–145. 10.1038/88850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Berman JR, Kenyon C. Germ-cell loss extends C. elegans life span through regulation of DAF-16 by kri-1 and lipophilic-hormone signaling. Cell. 2006;124: 1055–1068. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Amrit FRG, Steenkiste EM, Ratnappan R, Chen S-W, McClendon TB, Kostka D, et al. DAF-16 and TCER-1 Facilitate Adaptation to Germline Loss by Restoring Lipid Homeostasis and Repressing Reproductive Physiology in C. elegans. PLOS Genet. 2016;12: e1005788. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gerisch B, Weitzel C, Kober-Eisermann C, Rottiers V, Antebi A. A hormonal signaling pathway influencing C. elegans metabolism, reproductive development, and life span. Dev Cell. 2001;1: 841–51. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11740945 10.1016/s1534-5807(01)00085-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Walker AK, Jacobs L, Watts JL, Rottiers V, Jiang K, Finnegan DM, et al. A Conserved SREBP-1 / Phosphatidylcholine Feedback Circuit Regulates Lipogenesis in Metazoans. Cell. 2011;147: 840–852. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fu S, Yang L, Li P, Hofmann O, Dicker L, Hide W, et al. Aberrant lipid metabolism disrupts calcium homeostasis causing liver endoplasmic reticulum stress in obesity. Nature. 2011;473: 528–531. 10.1038/nature09968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xiao R, Zhang B, Dong Y, Gong J, Xu T, Liu J, et al. A genetic program promotes C. elegans longevity at cold temperatures via a thermosensitive TRP channel. Cell. 2013;152: 806–817. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jones KT, Greer ER, Pearce D, Ashrafi K. Rictor/torc2 regulates Caenorhabditis elegans fat storage, body size, and development through sgk-1. PLoS Biol. 2009;7: e1000060. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Soukas AA, Kane EA, Carr CE, Melo JA, Ruvkun G. Rictor/TORC2 regulates fat metabolism, feeding, growth, and life span in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev. 2009;23: 496–511. 10.1101/gad.1775409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Henderson ST, Johnson TE. daf-16 integrates developmental and environmental inputs to mediate aging in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol. 2001;11: 1975–80. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11747825 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00594-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Murphy CT, McCarroll S a, Bargmann CI, Fraser A, Kamath RS, Ahringer J, et al. Genes that act downstream of DAF-16 to influence the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2003;424: 277–283. 10.1038/nature01789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hotamisligil GS. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and the Inflammatory Basis of Metabolic Disease. Cell. 2010;140: 900–917. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sampieri L, Di Giusto P, Alvarez C. CREB3 Transcription Factors: ER-Golgi Stress Transducers as Hubs for Cellular Homeostasis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7: 123. 10.3389/fcell.2019.00123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nakagawa Y, Shimano H. CREBH regulates systemic glucose and lipid metabolism. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19: 1396. 10.3390/ijms19051396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Papsdorf K, Brunet A. Linking Lipid Metabolism to Chromatin Regulation in Aging. Trends Cell Biol. 2019;29: 97–116. 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.09.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Montoliu I, Scherer M, Beguelin F, DaSilva L, Mari D, Salvioli S, et al. Serum profiling of healthy aging identifies phospho- and sphingolipid species as markers of human longevity. Aging (Albany NY). 2014;6: 9–25. 10.18632/aging.100630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lin L, Cao B, Xu Z, Sui Y, Chen J, Luan Q, et al. In vivo HMRS and lipidomic profiling reveals comprehensive changes of hippocampal metabolism during aging in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;470: 9–14. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegnns. Genetics. 1974;77: 71–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Deng J, Dai Y, Tang H, Pang S. SKN-1 is a negative regulator of DAF-16 and somatic stress resistance in C. Elegans. G3 Genes, Genomes, Genet. 2020;10: 1707–1712. 10.1534/g3.120.401203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kamath RS, Fraser AG, Dong Y, Poulin G, Durbin R, Gotta M, et al. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature. 2003;421: 231–237. 10.1038/nature01278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pang S, Lynn DA, Lo JY, Paek J, Curran SP. SKN-1 and Nrf2 couples proline catabolism with lipid metabolism during nutrient deprivation. Nat Commun. 2014;5: 5048. 10.1038/ncomms6048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tang H, Pang S. Proline Catabolism Modulates Innate Immunity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Rep. 2016;17: 2837–2844. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimental H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14: R36. 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, Van Baren MJ, et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28: 511–515. 10.1038/nbt.1621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7: 562–578. 10.1038/nprot.2012.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Trapnell C, Hendrickson DG, Sauvageau M, Goff L, Rinn JL, Pachter L. Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-seq. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31: 46–53. 10.1038/nbt.2450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Dennis G, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, Lane H, et al. DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol. 2003;4: R60. 10.1186/gb-2003-4-9-r60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Brock TJ, Browse J, Watts JL. Genetic regulation of unsaturated fatty acid composition in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 2006;2: e108. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Deng J, Bai X, Tang H, Pang S. DNA damage promotes ER stress resistance through elevation of unsaturated phosphatidylcholine in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Biol Chem. 2021;296: 100095. 10.1074/jbc.ra120.016083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]