Skip to main content
Diabetology international logoLink to Diabetology international
. 2021 Jan 27;12(3):301–302. doi: 10.1007/s13340-021-00491-9

Correction to: Impact of actual waiting time and perceived waiting time on treatment satisfaction in patients receiving outpatient diabetes care

Shiori Toga-Sato 1,, Takahiro Tosaki 1, Masaki Kondo 2, Shin Tsunekawa 2, Yoshiro Kato 2, Jiro Nakamura 2, Hideki Kamiya 2
PMCID: PMC8172671  PMID: 34157059

Correction to: Diabetology International https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-020-00486-y

In the original publication of the article, in Tables 2 and 3, p-values should be replaced with No.of patients. The correct Tables 2 and 3 are provided below.

Table 2.

Three actual waiting time groups and diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire primary factor scores

Total Short group Moderate group Long group p value
Reception to blood collection No. of patients 334 (100.0) 116 (34.6) 113 (33.7) 106 (31.6)
Time measurement (min) 10.0 (6.0, 14.0) 5.0 (4.0, 7.0)b, c 10.0 (8.0, 11.0)a, c 15.5 (14.0, 21.0)a, b  < 0.001
DTSQ primary factors (points) 26.0 (20.0, 30.0) 26.5 (21.0, 30.0) 25.0 (19.5, 30.5) 25.0 (21.0, 30.3) 0.667
Blood collection to consultation No. of patients 334 (100.0) 124 (37.1) 112 (33.5) 98 (29.3)
Time measurement (min) 12.0 (9.0, 19.0) 7.5 (6.0, 9.0) b, c 13.0 (12.0, 15.0) a, c 24.0 (19.0, 32.0) a, b  < 0.001
DTSQ primary factors (points) 26.0 (20.0, 30.0) 27.0 (21.0, 32.0) 24.5 (19.3, 30.0) 25.5 (21.0, 30.0) 0.285
Consultation to accounting No. of patients 335 (100.0) 145 (43.3) 109 (32.5) 81 (24.2)
Time measurement (min) 5.0 (3.0, 7.0) 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) b, c 6.0 (5.0, 7.0) a, c 11.0 (9.0, 13.5) a, b  < 0.001
DTSQ primary factors (points) 26.0 (20.0, 30.0) 25.0 (21.0, 32.0) 26.0 (21.0, 30.0) 26.0 (19.5, 30.0) 0.470
Overall (reception to accounting) No. of patients 336 (100.0) 117 (34.8) 114 (33.9) 105 (31.3)
Time measurement (min) 44.0 (35.0, 56.0) 32.0 (27.0, 36.0) b, c 44.5 (42.0, 48.0) a, c 66.0 (57.0, 77.0) a, b  < 0.001
DTSQ primary factors (points) 26.0 (20.0, 30.0) 27.0 (21.0, 32.0) 24.0 (20.0, 29.3) 26.0 (20.0, 31.0) 0.133

No. of patients: n(%), Time measurement / DTSQ primary factors: median (25th percentile, 75th percentile), p value: intergroup comparison (Kruskal–Wallis test)

ap < 0.001, vs. short group, bp < 0.001, vs. moderate group, cp < 0.001, vs. long group (Bonferroni method)

The time measurements from reception to blood collection, blood collection to consultation, consultation to accounting, and overall (reception to accounting) were divided into tertiles to create three groups—a short waiting time, moderate waiting time, and long waiting time group

Table 3.

Actual times of the 4 perceived waiting time groups and diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire primary factor scores

Total Very short Short Long Very long p value
Reception to blood collection No. of patients 327 (100.0) 27 (8.3) 245 (74.9) 54 (16.5) 1 (0.3)
Time measurement (min) 10.0 (6.0, 14.0) 8.0 (5.0, 10.0)c 9.0 (6.0, 14.0) c 12.0 (8.8, 15.0) a, b 6.0 (6.0, 6.0) 0.002
DTSQ primary factors (points) 26.0 (20.0, 30.0) 30.0 (23.0, 33.0) 26.0 (20.3, 30.0) 25.0 (19.0, 29.3) * 34.0 (34.0, 34.0) 0.030
Blood collection to consultation No. of patients 325 (100.0) 10 (3.1) 119 (58.5) 98 (36.6) 6 (1.8)
Time measurement (min) 12.0 (9.0, 19.0) 10.5 (7.8, 15.0) 13.0 (8.3, 19.0) 25.5 (9.0, 19.0) 20.5 (8.8, 42.8) 0.293
DTSQ primary factors (points) 26.0 (20.0, 30.0) 33.0 (23.5, 36.0) 23.0 (22.0, 32.0) 24.0 (18.3, 28.0)*, † 21.5 (16.0, 31.0)  < 0.001
Consultation to accounting No. of patients 324 (100.0) 21 (6.5) 252 (77.8) 50 (15.4) 1 (0.3)
Time measurement (min) 5.0 (3.0, 7.0) 6.0 (2.5, 7.5) 5.0 (3.0, 7.0) 6.0 (3.0, 7.0) 11.0 (11.0, 11.0) 0.389
DTSQ primary factors (points) 26.0 (20.0, 30.0) 31.5 (26.8, 35.3)†, ‡ 26.0 (21.0, 30.0)*, ‡ 23.0 (17.0, 26.0) *, † 34.0 (34.0, 34.0)  < 0.001
Overall No. of patients 310 (100.0) 12 (3.9) 203 (60.4) 91 (27.1) 4 (1.3)
Time measurement (min) 44.0 (35.0, 56.0) 41.5 (31.3, 62.0) 43.0 (34.0, 52.0) 47.0 (39.0, 64.0) 44.0 (34.8, 51.8) 0.050
DTSQ primary factors (points) 26.0 (20.0, 30.0) 34.0 (30.0, 36.0) †, ‡ 26.0 (21.0, 31.0)*, ‡ 23.0 (18.0, 29.0) *, † 21.5 (14.0, 31.3)  < 0.001

No. of patients: n (%), Time measurement / DTSQ primary factors: median (25%tile, 75%tile), p value: intergroup comparison (Kruskal–Wallis test)

ap < 0.05, vs very short; bp < 0.05, vs short; cp < 0.05, vs long (Bonferroni method)

*p < 0.05, vs very short; †p < 0.05, vs short; ‡p < 0.05, vs long (Bonferroni method)

The original article has been corrected.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


Articles from Diabetology international are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES