Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Jun 3;16(6):e0252639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252639

Spatial distribution and geographical heterogeneity factors associated with poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children age 6–23 months in Ethiopia: Geographical weighted regression analysis

Sofonyas Abebaw Tiruneh 1,*,#, Dawit Tefera Fentie 2,#, Seblewongel Tigabu Yigizaw 2,, Asnakew Asmamaw Abebe 2,, Kassahun Alemu Gelaye 2,
Editor: Andrew Amos Channon3
PMCID: PMC8174682  PMID: 34081718

Abstract

Introduction

Vitamin A deficiency is a major public health problem in poor societies. Dietary consumption of foods rich in vitamin A was low in Ethiopia. This study aimed to assess the spatial distribution and spatial determinants of dietary consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia.

Methods

Ethiopian 2016 demographic and health survey dataset using a total of 3055 children were used to conduct this study. The data were cleaned and weighed by STATA version 14.1 software and Microsoft Excel. Children who consumed foods rich in vitamin A (Egg, Meat, Vegetables, Green leafy vegetables, Fruits, Organ meat, and Fish) at least one food item in the last 24 hours were declared as good consumption. The Bernoulli model was fitted using Kuldorff’s SaTScan version 9.6 software. ArcGIS version 10.7 software was used to visualize spatial distributions for poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A. Geographical weighted regression analysis was employed using MGWR version 2.0 software. A P-value of less than 0.05 was used to declare statistically significant predictors spatially.

Results

Overall, 62% (95% CI: 60.56–64.00) of children aged 6–23 months had poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A in Ethiopia. Poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A highly clustered in Afar, eastern Tigray, southeast Amhara, and the eastern Somali region of Ethiopia. Spatial scan statistics identified 142 primary spatial clusters located in Afar, the eastern part of Tigray, most of Amhara and some part of the Oromia Regional State of Ethiopia. Children living in the primary cluster were 46% more likely vulnerable to poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A than those living outside the window (RR = 1.46, LLR = 83.78, P < 0.001). Poor wealth status of the household, rural residence and living tropical area of Ethiopia were spatially significant predictors.

Conclusion

Overall, the consumption of foods rich in vitamin A was low and spatially non-random in Ethiopia. Poor wealth status of the household, rural residence and living tropical area were spatially significant predictors for the consumption of foods rich in vitamin A in Ethiopia. Policymakers and health planners should intervene in nutrition intervention at the identified hot spot areas to reduce the poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months.

Introduction

Vitamin A is a fat-soluble vitamin used for rhodopsin formation, a photoreceptor pigment of the retina, which helps maintain epithelial tissues, and immune enhancers [1]. Mainly performed retinol and provitamin carotenoid foods rich in vitamin A were available. Preformed retinol foods rich in vitamin A were exclusively found in animal products, and provitamin A carotenoids were found in green leafy vegetables [2]. Vitamin A deficiency (VAD) is a major public health problem in poor societies, especially in low-income countries. Vitamin A deficiency remains prevalent in South Asia (44%; 13%– 79%) and sub-Saharan Africa (48%; 25% –75%) [3]. In 2013, 94 500 (54 200–146 800) diarrhea-related deaths and 11 200 (4300–20 500) measles-related deaths were attribute by vitamin A deficiency in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia [3]. The estimated prevalence of vitamin A deficiency among children in Ethiopia ranges between 20% and 39% [1,3].

Low consumption of foods rich in vitamin A during nutritionally demanding periods in life, such as infancy and childhood, consequences vitamin A deficiency disorders [4]. Its deficiency was associated with measles, diarrhea, malaria and other infectious disease morbidity and mortality among children [3,5]. Dietary consumption of foods rich in vitamin A affected by the socio-economic and demographic status of the household [6,7], maternal knowledge and media exposure about infant and young child feeding (IYCF) and husband involvement in IYCF [8], maternal and husband education [7,9], and media exposure [9,10] were some of the factors significantly affecting dietary consumption. Vitamin A supplementation is associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in morbidity and mortality in children [5]. A meta-analysis of 17 trials showed that vitamin consumption reduces all-cause mortality and the overall risk of death by 24% among children. Another trial showed that consumption of foods rich in vitamin A and supplementation significantly reduced diarrhea-related mortality by 28% among children [11].

Despite the importance of vitamin, A-rich food consumption for children, the consumption of foods rich in vitamin A in Ethiopia remains low. Previous studies have shown that only 7% to 39% of children aged 6–23 months consume plant source foods [6,8,12], whereas only 12 to 24% of children aged 6–23 months consumed animal source vitamin A-rich foods in Ethiopia [6,12]. However, egg (11.0%) and meat (2.6%) were less frequently consumed foods [8]. Even though, a paucity of information in the spatial distribution of foods rich in vitamin A, different studies evidenced that dietary diversity and malnutrition were non-random spatially in Ethiopia [13,14]

To date, different studies have been conducted in Ethiopia to assess dietary diversity among children, including foods rich in vitamin A consumption [15,16] However, there is no evidence conducted to determine the spatial distribution of dietary consumption of foods rich in vitamin A across the regions of Ethiopia. Exploring the spatial distribution of dietary consumption of foods rich in vitamin A in the regions of Ethiopia used for local specific nutrition intervention to tackle vitamin A deficiency-related child morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the objective of this study was to explore the spatial distribution of dietary consumption of foods rich in vitamin A and its spatial determinants among children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia.

Methods and materials

Study design, area and period

This study is a community-based cross-sectional study conducted using the nationally representative 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) dataset. Ethiopia is situated in the Horn of Africa from 30 to 140 and 330 to 480E.

Source and study populations

The source population was all living children aged 6–23 months preceding the survey whereas, all living children aged 6–23 months living with their mother was the study population in the selected Enumeration Areas (EAs). In the 2016 EDHS, a total of 645 clusters (EAs) (202 urban and 443 rural) selected with a probability proportional to each EA size and independent selection in each sampling stratum. Among the selected clusters with zero coordinates and clusters without a proportion of children, the status of consumption of foods rich in vitamin A was excluded from the analysis. Finally, we selected a total of 598 (185 urban and 413 rural) clusters for this study. Among the selected clusters, a total of 3055 weighted number of living children aged 6–23 months living with their mother were included.

We accessed the recorded data at https://dhsprogram.com/ upon request.

Data collection tools and procedures

Ethiopian demographic and health survey data were collected by a two-stage stratified cluster sampling technique. Each region of the country was stratified into urban and rural areas, yielding 21 sampling strata. In the first stage, 645 EAs were selected with a probability proportional to the EA size by independent selection in each sampling stratum. In the second stage, a fixed number of 28 households per cluster were selected with an equal probability of systematic sampling from the newly created household listing. The detailed sampling procedure is available in the EDHS reports from the Measure DHS website (www.dhsprogram.com).

Outcome variable

Children were aged 6–23 months living with their mother who consumed foods rich in vitamin A (Egg, Meat, Vegetables, Green leafy vegetables, Fruits, Organ meat, and Fish) at least one food item among the seven food items at any time in the last 24 hours preceding the interview was declared good consumption of foods rich in vitamin A, whereas no consumption in the seven food items rich in vitamin A in 24 hours preceding the interview was poor consumption [17].

Independent variables

From the 2016 EDHS datasets, the proportion of mothers’ age, educational status of mother and husband, residence, the religion of mother, parity, wealth index status, media exposure, and altitude were considered independent variables.

Operational definition

Media exposure

If the respondents have a chance to listen to either radio or television declare as having media exposure if not both not have media exposure.

Altitude

It is declared as, Tropical zone (Kolla)—is below 1830 meters in elevation, Subtropical (Woina Dega)—includes the highlands areas of 1830–2440 meters elevation, and Cool zone (Dega) is above 2440 meters in elevation.

Data management and analysis

The data were cleaned by STATA version 14.1 software and Microsoft Excel. Sample weighting was performed for further analysis.

Spatial autocorrelation and hot spot analysis

Spatial autocorrelation (Global Moran’s I) statistic was conducted to assess whether the consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months was dispersed, clustered, or randomly distributed in Ethiopia. Moran’s I values close to −1 indicate poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A dispersed, close to +1 indicates clustered, and if Moran’s I value zero indicates randomly distributed [18]. A statistically significant Moran’s I value (p < 0.05) had a chance to reject the null hypothesis, which indicates the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Hot spot analysis (the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic) of the z-scores and significant p-values tells the features with either hot spot or cold spot values for the clusters spatially.

Empirical Bayesian Kriging spatial interpolation

The spatial interpolation technique is used to predict poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months for unsampled areas in the country based on sampled EAs. For the prediction of unsampled EAs, we used deterministic and geostatistical empirical Bayesian Kriging spatial interpolation techniques. Empirical Bayesian Kriging relaxes the assumption of the Gaussian distribution of the observed semivariogram in the input data, which rarely holds true in practice. Empirical Bayesian Kriging interpolation works by generating a new simulated semivariogram at each location from the estimated semivariogram from the input data. The weight of the new simulated semivariogram is calculated by Bayes’ rule [19].

Spatial scan statistics

We employed Bernoulli-based model spatial scan statistics to determine the geographical locations of statistically significant clusters for poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months using Kuldorff’s SaTScan version 9.6 software [20]. The scanning window that moves across the study area, in which children aged 6–23 months with poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A were taken as cases and those with good consumption were taken as controls to fit the Bernoulli model. The default maximum spatial cluster size of < 50% of the population was used as an upper limit, allowing both small and large clusters to be detected, and ignored clusters that contained more than the maximum limit with the circular shape of the window. Most likely clusters were identified using p-values and likelihood ratio tests based on the 999 Monte Carlo replications.

Geographically weighted regression analysis

The ordinary least squares regression (OLS) model is a global model that estimates only one single coefficient per explanatory variable over the entire study area. Global models assume factors that affect poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A were stationary geographically. The assumption of geographical independence may bias the parameter estimates. The assumption of geographical independence relaxes by geographically weighted regression analysis. A geographically weighted regression model is an extension of the OLS regression model and gives local parameter estimates to reflect changes over space in the association between an outcome and explanatory variables [18].

For the interest of geographically weighted regression analysis, the aggregated proportion of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months and all the predictor variables were calculated for each cluster. To determine the predictor variables for poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months, we used a geographically weighted regression (GWR) model.

To check the assumption of spatial dependency, an explanatory analysis was performed first by Arc GIS 10.7 software. Statistically significant (P < 0.01) Koenker (BP) statistics indicate that the relationships are not consistent (either due to non-stationarity or heteroscedasticity). Multicollinearity (variance inflation factor <7.5) was checked to exclude redundancy among explanatory variables. In the case of spatial dependency, the coefficient of the independent variable varies locally, and the predictor variables may or may not be significant locally. The model structure of geographically weighted regression is written as

Yi=β0(ui,vi)+Σkβk(ui,vi)Xik+εI

Where Yi is the response variable, (ui, vi) denotes the coordinates of the ith point in space, β0 is the intercept at the (ui, vi) coordinate, βk is the coefficient of the covariate X at the (ui, vi) coordinate, and εi is the random error term.

Model calibration

We used Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) version 2.0 software to calibrate the parameter estimates of the Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) model [21]. The new version of GWR is termed multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) and potentially provides a more flexible and scalable framework in which to examine multiscale processes. Adaptive bi-square kernels were used for geographical weighting to estimate local parameter estimates. The golden section search method was used to determine the best bandwidth size based on corrected Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc), and the bandwidth with the lowest AICc was used to determine the best fit model for local parameter estimates.

Geographical variability for each coefficient can be assessed by comparing the AICc between the GWR model and the global OLS regression model. The corrected Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) was obtained by minimizing the Akaike Information Criteria (AIC), which is [18]:

AICc=2nloge(σˆ)+nloge(2π)+{(n+tr(s))(n-2-tr(s))}

Where n is the sample size, σˆ is the estimated standard deviation of the error term, and tr(S) denotes the trace of the hat matrix, which is a function of the bandwidth. Finally, local parameter estimates were plotted on Arc GIS 10.7 (ESRI Inc., Redlands, CA, USA, version 10.7) software.

Ethical consideration

We submitted a concept paper to DHS Program/ICF International Inc., and a letter of permission was confirmed from the International Review Board of Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) program data archivist to download the dataset for this study.

Results

Characteristics of the respondents and study children

A total of 3055 children aged 6–23 months were included in this study. More than half (53%) of the children were females. Of the total children, 18.45% were aged 6–8 months, and 36.6% were aged 12–17 months. The mean ± SD age of the children was 13.92 ± 5.05 months. The majority (67.50%) of the mothers were in the age group of 20–34 years. The mean ± SD age of the mothers was 28.25 ± 6.47 years. Most (94%) mothers were married. Forty-four per cent of the households had poor household wealth status (Table 1).

Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents and study children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia, EDHS 2016 (n = 3055).

Variables Frequency (n) Percent (%)
Child age (months) 6–8 months 564 18.45
9–11 months 502 16.43
12–17 months 1,118 36.59
18–23 months 871 28.53
Child sex Male 1,433 46.90
Female 1,622 53.10
Mother’s age (years) <20 369 12.08
20–34 2,062 67.50
35–49 624 20.42
Marital status Married 2864 93.76
Not married 191 6.24
Religion Orthodox 1,049 34.35
Muslim 1,236 40.45
Others* 770 25.20
Mother’s education No education 1,864 61.03
Primary education 936 30.62
Secondary and above 255 8.35
Husband’s education No education 1,291 44.55
Primary education 1,198 41.34
Secondary and above 408 14.10
Mother occupation Working 1,265 41.41
Not working 1,790 58.59
Husband occupation Working 2,717 88.93
Not working 338 11.07
Family size Less than three 1,650 54.00
Greater than four 1,405 46.00
Media exposure No media exposure 2,045 66.92
Had media exposure 1,010 33.08
Household wealth Poor 1,350 44.18
Middle 683 22.37
Rich 1,022 33.44
Residence Rural 2,684 87.85
Urban 371 12.15
Altitude Tropical zone (Kolla) 1,362 44.58
Sub-tropical zone (Woina Dega) 1,159 37.92
Cool zone (Dega) 534 17.50
Total 3055 100

* = Catholic, Protestant, Traditional.

Vitamin A rich food consumption among children aged 6–23 months

Overall, two-thirds (62%: 95% CI: 60.56–64.00) of children aged 6–23 months had poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A. Animal source foods were the least consumed foods in the last 24 hours in the survey period. Egg consumption was reported to the most taken food in the last 24-hours period (Table 2).

Table 2. Consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months in the last 24 hours preceding survey EDHS, 2016, Ethiopia (n = 3055).

S. No. Food groups interviewed in the last 24 hours. Consumption status
Good (%) Poor (%)
1 Have the child took eggs in the last 24 hours? 16.81 83.19
2 Has the child taken meat (beef, pork, lamb, chicken, etc.) in the last 24 hours? 5.95 94.05
3 Has the child taken a pumpkin, carrots, squash (yellow or orange inside) in the last 24 hours? 12.17 87.83
4 Has the child taken any dark green leafy vegetables in the last 24 hours? 13.56 86.44
5 Has the child taken mangoes, papayas, other vitamin A fruits in the last 24 hours? 12.83 87.17
6 Has the child taken liver, heart, other organs in the last 24 hours? 3.89 96.11
7 Has the child taken fish or shellfish in the last 24 hours? 1.31 98.69
Overall consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children age 6–23 months. 32.70 62.30

Spatial distribution of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months

To determine spatial clustering of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A, global spatial statistics were estimated using Moran’s I value. As shown in the figure below, statistically significant z-scores indicate at 152 km distances where spatial processes promoting clustering are most pronounced. The incremental spatial autocorrelation indicates that a total of 8 distance bands were detected with a beginning distance of 120 000 meters. The spatial distribution of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia was found to be nonrandom, with a global Moran’s I of 0.21 and a p-value of 0.001. For the z-score of 14.13, there is less than 1% likelihood that this high-clustered pattern could be the result of random chance (Fig 1).

Fig 1. The spatial autocorrelation of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia.

Fig 1

Hot spot (Getis-Ord Gi*) analysis

As shown in Fig 2 below, the red color indicates the more intense clustering of a high (hot spot) proportion with poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A preceding the survey period. A high proportion of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months clustered in Afar, eastern Tigray, southeast Amhara, and the eastern Somali region of Ethiopia. However, Addis Ababa, Gamebela, and Central Oromia regions of Ethiopia were less risk areas for poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months.

Fig 2. Hot spot analysis of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months, in Ethiopia.

Fig 2

Spatial scan statistics analysis

In spatial scan analysis, a total of 187 significant clusters were identified. As shown in Fig 3 below, the red window indicates the significant clusters. Among the significant clusters, 142 clusters most likely (primary), and 45 clusters were secondary. The most likely (primary) clusters were located at 11.626646 N, 39.666950 E in a 278.08 km radius in Afar, the eastern part of Tigray, and most of Amhara National Regional State of Ethiopia. The secondary significant clusters were located at 6.745502 N, 44.259010 E in a 360.64 km radius in Somali and some part of the Oromia National Regional State of Ethiopia. Children were aged 6–23 months living in the primary cluster were 46% more likely vulnerable to poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A than outside the window (RR = 1.46, LLR = 83.78, P-value < 0.001). Children living in the secondary cluster were 36% more likely to risk poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A than those living outside the window (RR = 1.36, LLR = 27.18, P-value < 0.001) (Table 3).

Fig 3. Most likely (primary) and secondary cluster for poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months, Ethiopia.

Fig 3

Table 3. Significant spatial scan statistics clusters of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months, EDHS, 2016.

Cluster type Significant Enumeration Areas(clusters) detected Coordinates/Radius Populations Cases RR LLR P-value
Primary 496, 189, 611, 571, 191, 345, 478, 254, 389, 591, 18, 200, 241, 455, 401, 354, 332, 368, 616, 344, 249, 348, 55, 617, 97, 351, 488, 544, 442, 547, 545, 300, 66, 136, 570, 627, 276, 449, 460, 128, 599, 620, 143, 334, 176, 38, 392, 205, 79, 542, 310, 283, 499, 178, 10, 267, 199, 637, 511, 102, 130, 160, 37, 206, 132, 172, 295, 135, 120, 421, 424, 427, 440, 456, 538, 632, 510, 596, 384, 572, 512, 336, 628, 605, 482, 550, 237, 94, 24, 484, 220, 201, 163, 575, 75, 403, 430, 152, 327, 158, 585, 350, 423, 99, 298, 623, 167, 579, 235, 425, 564, 429, 312, 80, 4, 127, 73, 531, 196, 355, 362, 169, 129, 382, 322, 551, 230, 640, 226, 375, 431, 51, 604, 474, 263, 156, 341, 218, 516, 121, 481, 188 11.627 N, 39.667 E / 278.08 km 663 554 1.46 83.78 < 0.001
Secondary 490, 543, 92, 492, 171, 198, 146, 95, 85, 358, 164, 138, 497, 521, 588, 458, 553, 278, 77, 629, 214, 318, 251, 573, 187, 239, 116, 22 33, 568, 277, 527, 269, 556, 630, 64, 439, 57, 480, 8, 210, 186, 454, 436, 566 6.745 N, 44.259 E / 360.64 km 250 209 1.36 27.18 < 0.001

NB: RR = Relative Risk, LLR = Log-Likelihood Ratio.

Prevalence of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia

In most parts of Ethiopia, children aged 6–23 months, were vulnerable to poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A. Children living in Afar, eastern Amhara, and eastern Somalia regions of Ethiopia were more vulnerable to poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A as compared to other regions of Ethiopia (Fig 4).

Fig 4. Empirical Bayesian Kriging interpolation of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months, Ethiopia.

Fig 4

Geographically weighted regression and ordinary least squares model comparison

Selected predictor variables fitted in the geographically weighted regression model. For model compression, both the ordinary least squares (OLS) model and the geographical weighted regression (GWR) model were fitted. The bandwidth corrected Akakian Information Criteria (AICc), adjusted R2, and log-likelihood were considered for model comparison. Comparing the global model, geographical weighted regression was the best fit model with an AICc of 1570 compared with 1616. Additionally, the GWR model best explained by the predictor variables for poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months, with an adjusted R2 value of 62% compared to 28% (Table 4).

Table 4. Model comparison between the OLS and the GWR model.

Values OLS Model GWR Model
AICc 1616.27 1570.65
Adjusted R2 28% 62%
Log likelihood -788.48 -742.23

NB: AICc = corrected Akakian Information Criteria.

Spatial factors associated with poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A

In the geographically weighted regression model independent variables, poor wealth status of the household, rural residence, and living in the tropical area were spatially statistically significant factors for poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6 to 23 months. The strength of the association with independent variables varies spatially, and the effects of variables had a positive and negative effect spatially.

The poor wealth status of the household had different statistical significance in different parts of Ethiopia for poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6 to 23 months. The coefficients of poor wealth status vary spatially between 0.088 and 0.203, indicating that the effect of association differs across regions of Ethiopia. In the significant parts of Ethiopia, a 1% increase in the poor wealth status proportion of the household increases the prevalence of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6 to 23 months by a range of 14.6% to 20.3%. Poor wealth status was not statistically significant in the Benishangul Gumez Regional state, most of the Tigray and Amhara regional states, and some of the Oromia and Gambela regional states of Ethiopia (Fig 5).

Fig 5. Geographically varying values of significance level and coefficients per cluster for independent variable poor wealth household status of poor consumption food rich in vitamin A in the final GWR model.

Fig 5

The residence was statistically significant for poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A across regions of Ethiopia. The effect size of rural residence varies spatially from -0.072 to 0.309, which indicates that rural residents had a negative and positive effect spatially for poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months. Keeping other factors constant, living in rural areas had increased the risk of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A by a range of 22.5% to 31% (Fig 6).

Fig 6. Geographically varying values of significance and coefficients per cluster for the independent variable rural residence of poor consumption foods rich in vitamin A in the final GWR model.

Fig 6

Furthermore, children living in the tropical areas of Ethiopia had different spatial significance for the poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A. The effects of living in tropical areas on poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months vary by a range of -0.284 to 0.235, which indicates both negative and positive effects on vitamin A-rich food consumption. Keeping other factors constant, children living in the tropical area of Benishangul Gumez, the western part of Amhara and Oromia, and Gambela regions of Ethiopia had a decreased risk of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A by a factor of 19% to 29%, whereas children living in the tropical area of Somalia regional state of Ethiopia had an increased risk of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A (Fig 7).

Fig 7. Geographically varying values of significance and coefficients per cluster for the independent variable living tropical area of poor consumption foods rich in vitamin A in the final GWR model.

Fig 7

Discussion

This study revealed that 62.30% (95% CI: 60.56%, 64.00%) of children aged 6–23 months had poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A in Ethiopia. The findings of this study were lower than those of a study conducted in southern Ethiopia (71%) and the 2011 Ethiopia Demographic Health survey report (74%) [6,12]. This finding was higher than that of the study conducted in Gorche district Ethiopia, the 2014 Demographic Health survey report of Kenya (28%) and Ghana (33%), and the 2016 Demographic Health survey report of India (56%) [8,2224].

Our study showed that the spatial distribution of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A was non-random in Ethiopia. Poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A highly clustered in Afar, eastern Tigray, southeast Amhara, and the eastern Somali Regional State of Ethiopia. In line with this high proportion of clustering, spatial scan statistics analysis revealed that 187 significant clusters were identified. A high proportion of the poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A in the Tigray and Amhara Regional states was supported by the Ethiopia National Food Consumption Survey report [25]. Even though there is no spatial analysis conducted among children aged 6–23 months, it is fair to interpret spatial studies conducted in another nutrition status. The spatial distribution of vitamin A-rich food consumption has supported a study conducted in Ethiopia which is childhood undernutrition was clustered at Northern, Middle, North East and North West areas of Ethiopia particularly from all administrative zones of Amhara, Tigray, and Afar [13]. Besides, in a study conducted in South Africa, the spatial distribution of nutritional status among childhood period was non-random geographically [26]. Furthermore, a recent study conducted on the spatial distribution of iron-rich food consumption in Ethiopia showed that spatial clustering was consistent with this finding [27]. The observed geographical variation of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A across regions of Ethiopia might be due to the regional variation in dietary preference, low practice to complementary feeding, socioeconomic status, demographic factors such as pastoralist region, and seasonal differences for the consumption of fruits and vegetables [28].

The local parameter estimates of the predictor variables of the model fit vary spatially in Ethiopia. Poor wealth status of the household, rural residence, and living in the tropical area of Ethiopia were statistically significant local independent variables for poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months.

Our study revealed that the poor household wealth status was a spatially statistically significant predictor variable for poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A. In the significant parts of Ethiopia, a 1% increase proportion of poor wealth status of the household could increase the prevalence of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months 14.6% to 20.3%. The findings of this study are supported by previous studies in Ethiopia [7,10,15], which evidenced that children born from the richest household had adequate dietary diversity and male frequency. Another study in Nepal [29], showed that children from the poorest household wealth quintile had higher odds of not consuming legumes and nuts, dairy products, flesh foods, other fruits and vegetables and did not meet the minimum dietary diversity. This finding is not similar to a study done in Ethiopia, which found that the household wealth status is not statistically significant for the consumption of foods rich in vitamin A [6]. The possible reason for its inconstancy might be setting, time, and sample size deference. The possible reason might be that households with poor wealth did not obtain minimum meal frequency for their child, and poor household wealth will affect adherence to the consumption of foods rich in vitamin A and dietary diversity to their child [30].

Another factor spatially affecting consumption of foods rich in vitamin A was residence. Living in rural areas increased the risk of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A by a range of 22.5% to 31%. This study is consistent with the study done in Ethiopia, which found that children living in rural areas had poor consumption of dietary diversity [31]. The possible justification might be living in rural areas had no access to foods rich in vitamin A, poor knowledge about foods rich in vitamin A, and other socioeconomic factors [32].

Furthermore, this study revealed that children living in the tropical area of Ethiopia were spatially significant for poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A. Children living in the tropical area of Benishangul, the western part of Amhara, Oromia, and Gambela region of Ethiopia had less risk of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A by a range of 19% to 29%, whereas children living in the tropical area of Somalia regional state of Ethiopia had poor consumption of vitamin A-rich foods. The possible discrepancy might be the different accessibility of fruit and vegetable vitamin A rich foods and different cultural and behavioral practices in the feeding of the child in these different regions of Ethiopia.

Strength and limitation of the study

As Tobler’s first law of geography states, "Everything is related to everything else, but near things are more related than distant things"[33]. Based on Tobler’s first law of geography, poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A was spatially autocorrelated. In the presence of spatial dependence and heterogeneity, the estimates obtained from the global model would be biased. Therefore, fitting the GWR model and knowing the spatial distribution of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A in the regions of Ethiopia provides important insight to policymakers and health planners and valuable hot spot maps used for more effective and cost-efficient nutrition intervention.

The limitation of this study was that the coordinates collected at the cluster level were not individual-level which is difficult to do at the individual level, and clusters without coordinates that were deleted may not be representative. As well, the consumption status of vitamin A-rich foods were measured 24 hours recall will lead to recall and social desirability bias.

Conclusion and recommendations

In Ethiopia, poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A varies geographically across the regions of Ethiopia. Spatially statistically significant hot spots of poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A were identified in Afar, eastern Tigray, southeast Amhara, and the eastern Somali region of Ethiopia, whereas Addis Ababa, Gamebela, and Central Oromia regions of Ethiopia were less risk areas. This study showed that predictor variables for poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A vary spatially in Ethiopia. Poor wealth status of the household, rural residence and living tropical area were spatially statistically significant predictors across different regions of Ethiopia. Therefore, policymakers and health planners should design nutrition intervention programs at the identified hot spot areas to reduce the poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children.

The implications for policymakers and researchers

The results of this study provide a rich understanding of the spatial distribution consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia. The finding of hot spot maps in line with scan statistics analysis across Ethiopia used to policymakers to give direct nutrition intervention locally. This study focuses on the typical consumption of foods rich in vitamin A. The association between dependent and independent variables might vary across different parts geographically. In such situations, fitting the global model may bias the parameter estimates. With this concept, other researchers should apply the GWR model to assess other nutritional problems and dietary diversity among children and reproductive age group mothers, particularly micronutrient insecure areas.

Supporting information

S1 File

(RAR)

Acknowledgments

We, Authors, acknowledged the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) program for the accusation of the dataset.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and/or Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Demissie T, Ali A, Mekonen Y, Haider J, Umeta M. Magnitude and distribution of vitamin A deficiency in Ethiopia. Food Nutr Bull. 2010;31: 234–241. doi: 10.1177/156482651003100206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.FAO, WHO. Vitamin and mineral requirements in human nutrition. Second edition. World Heal Organ Food Agric Organ United Nations. 2004; 1–362. doi:92 4 154612 3.
  • 3.Stevens GA, Bennett JE, Hennocq Q, Lu Y, De-Regil LM, Rogers L, et al. Trends and mortality effects of vitamin A deficiency in children in 138 low-income and middle-income countries between 1991 and 2013: A pooled analysis of population-based surveys. Lancet Glob Heal. 2015;3: e528–e536. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00039-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Orgnaisation. Global prevalence of vitamin A deficiency in populations at risk WHO Global Database on Vitamin A Deficiency WHO Global Database on Vitamin A Deficiency. WHO Glob Database Vitam A Defic. 2009;Geneva.
  • 5.Imdad A, Mayo-Wilson E, Herzer K, Bhutta ZA. Vitamin A supplementation for preventing morbidity and mortality in children from six months to five years of age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008524.pub3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jemberu Y, Zegeye M, Singh P, Abebe H. Consumption of Vitamin A Rich Foods and Associated Factors among Children Aged 6–23 Months in Kachabira. Int J Food Sci Nutr Eng. 2017;7: 1–10. doi: 10.5923/j.food.20170701.01 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Girma A, Woldie H, Mekonnen FA, Gonete KA, Sisay M. Undernutrition and associated factors among urban children aged 24–59 months in Northwest Ethiopia: A community based cross sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19: 1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1376-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dangura D, Gebremedhin S. Dietary diversity and associated factors among children 6–23 months of age in Gorche district, Southern Ethiopia: Cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17: 1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0759-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Eshete T, Kumera G, Bazezew Y, Mihretie A, Marie T. Determinants of inadequate minimum dietary diversity among children aged 6-23months in Ethiopia: Secondary data analysis from Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Agric Food Secur. 2018;7: 1–8. doi: 10.1186/s40066-018-0219-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Aemro M, Mesele M, Birhanu Z, Atenafu A. Dietary diversity and meal frequency practices among infant and young children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia: A secondary analysis of Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey 2011. J Nutr Metab. 2013;2013. doi: 10.1155/2013/782931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.WHO. Guideline: Vitamin A supplementation in infants and children 6–59 months of age. Who. 2011; 1–25. doi:ISBN 978 92 4 150176 7.
  • 12.Central Statistical Agency Addis Ababa EI. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2011 Central Statistical Agency. 2012. Available: http://www.measuredhs.com.
  • 13.Alemu ZA, Ahmed AA, Yalew AW, Birhanu BS. Non random distribution of child undernutrition in Ethiopia: Spatial analysis from the 2011 Ethiopia demographic and health survey. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15: 1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0290-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hagos S, Hailemariam D, WoldeHanna T, Lindtjørn B. Spatial heterogeneity and risk factors for stunting among children under age five in Ethiopia: A Bayesian geo-statistical model. PLoS One. 2017;12: 1–18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Solomon D, Aderaw Z, Tegegne TK. Minimum dietary diversity and associated factors among children aged 6–23 months in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16: 1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0499-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kuche D, Moss C, Eshetu S, Ayana G, Salasibew M, Dangour AD, et al. Factors associated with dietary diversity and length-for-age z-score in rural Ethiopian children aged 6–23 months: A novel approach to the analysis of baseline data from the Sustainable Undernutrition Reduction in Ethiopia evaluation. Matern Child Nutr. 2020;16: 1–11. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Croft Trevor N., Marshall Aileen M. J., Allen Courtney K. et al. Guide to DHS Statistics. DHS-7 The Demographic and Health Surveys Program. USAID. 2018. pp. 1–645. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C CM. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships,. John Wiley Sons. 2003;35: 272–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2003.tb01114.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Krivoruchko K. Empirical bayesian kriging. Esri Redlands, CA, USA. 2012.
  • 20.Kulldorff M. Theory and Methods A spatial scan statistic. Commun Stat. 1997;26(6): 1481–1496. doi: 10.1080/03610929708831995 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fotheringham AS, Yang W, Kang W. Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR). Ann Am Assoc Geogr. 2017;107: 1247–1265. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1352480. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kenya National Bureau of Statistics Nairobi K. Demographic and Health Survey Kenya, 2014. 2014.
  • 23.Ghana Statistical Service GHS and II. Ghana Health and Demographic Survey 2013. 2014.
  • 24.International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015–16: India. Mumbai: IIPS. For. 2017. Available: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR339/FR339.pdf.
  • 25.(PhD) AK, General D, Kebede A, Modes T. Ethiopia National Food Consumption Survey. Ethiop Public Heal Inst. 2013. Available: http://www.ephi.gov.et.
  • 26.Sartorius B, Sartorius K, Green R, Lutge E, Scheelbeek P, Tanser F, et al. temporal trends and risk factors for undernutrition and obesity among children (< 5 years) in South Africa, 2008–2017: findings from a nationally representative longitudinal panel survey. 2020; 1–17. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tiruneh SA, Bukayaw YA, Yigizaw ST, Angaw DA. Prevalence of hypertension and its determinants in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Harika R, Faber M, Samuel F, Mulugeta A, Kimiywe J, Eilander A. Are Low Intakes and Deficiencies in Iron, Vitamin A, Zinc, and Iodine of Public Health Concern in Ethiopian, Kenyan, Nigerian, and South African Children and Adolescents? Food Nutr Bull. 2017;38: 405–427. doi: 10.1177/0379572117715818 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Baek Y, Chitekwe S. Sociodemographic factors associated with inadequate food group consumption and dietary diversity among infants and young children in Nepal. PLoS One. 2019;14: 1–17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Damtie A, Id A, Atenafu A, Sisay M. Adequate vitamin A rich food consumption and associated factors among lactating mothers visiting child immunization and post- natal clinic at health institutions in Gondar. 2020;3: 1–14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Edris MM, Atnafu NT, Abota TL. Determinants of Dietary Diversity Score among Children Age between 6–23 Months in Bench Maji Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. Pediatr Heal Res. 2018;3: 1–6. doi: 10.21767/2574-2817.100035 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Beletew B, Gebremichael B, Tesfaye T, Mengesha A, Wudu M. The practice of key essential nutrition action messages and associated factors among mothers of children from birth up to 2 years old in Wereilu Wereda, south Wollo zone, Amhara, Northeast Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study. 2019; 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1814-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tobler WR. A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region. Econ Geogr. 1970;46: 234. doi: 10.2307/143141 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Miquel Vall-llosera Camps

26 Nov 2020

PONE-D-20-16369

Spatial distribution and geographical heterogeneity factors associated with poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children age 6 -23 months in Ethiopia: Geographical weighted regression analysis

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Tiruneh,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

I would like to sincerely apologise for the delay you have incurred with your submission. It has been exceptionally difficult to secure reviewers to evaluate your study. We have now received two completed reviews; their comments are available below.

Please revise the manuscript to address all the reviewer's comments in a point-by-point response in order to ensure it is meeting the journal's publication criteria. Please note that the revised manuscript will need to undergo further review, we thus cannot at this point anticipate the outcome of the evaluation process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 09 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Miquel Vall-llosera Camps

Senior Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2.We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.  

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

  • The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

  • A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

  • A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

3.Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

[We, authors, acknowledge The Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Program funded by the

U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) for the accusation dataset.]

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

 [The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.]

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4.We note that [Figure(s) 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7] in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

1.    You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure(s) [2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7] to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

2.    If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: It is an interesting article whose findings can help policymakers and health planners to select appropriate interventions. The methodology used can be also used to identify hot spot areas of low consumption of vitamin A and its determinants not only in Ethiopia but also in other Sub-Sahara Africa countries. However, there are some caveats and extensive editing of English language and style will be needed to facilitate the reading of the whole document.

Background

It is difficult to follow the different paragraph, although the background section provides sufficient information and include relevant references.

The background section needs to be reorganized. It will be helpful to combine some paragraphs. For example, the first three paragraphs can be reduced to one.

Results

Table 1: Since the study is related to children, it will be better to present children characteristics before the mothers’ results.

Discussion

It will be important not to repeat most of results in the discussion section.

The consumption status of Foods rich in Vitamin A among children age 6-23 months was determined using a 24-hour recall. The results need to be analyzed with precaution, as it does not reflect any dietary habits. Thus, it needs to be highlighted in Discussion.

It will be helpful to give some examples of regional variation dietary preference, low practice to complementary feeding, or socioeconomic status.

References for this confirmation: The possible justification might be living in rural area had no access to get foods rich in vitamin A, poor knowledge about foods rich in vitamin A, and other socioeconomic factors.

Reviewer #2: This study aimed to assess the spatial distribution and its determinants of dietary consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6-23 months in Ethiopia. It could provide valuable information to identify areas with high vitamin A deficiency. However, there are a number of issues to be addressed.

Abstract

- Methods: please specify how poor vitamin A consumption was defined

Background

- Need references for the sentence ‘So far, different studies conducted in Ethiopia to assess dietary diversity among children including foods rich in vitamin A consumption’.

- The authors presented the importance of vitamin A in the background. However, the background regarding geospatial analysis is relatively weak. The authors should provide more details to strengthen the justification of this study. For instance, the authors indicated that there was no evidence on geospatial distribution of dietary consumption in Ethiopia. However, relevant studies were done from other countries so it would be informative to add- what is the current knowledge on geospatial distribution of dietary intake, specifically in Africa, what is the gap and how this study could contribute to the existing body of evidence. Also, if there is no study on spatial distribution of dietary consumption of foods rich in vitamin A, it would be still useful to add studies in Ethiopia targeting other nutrients or other nutrition outcomes such as stunting and wasting.

- ‘The magnitude of vitamin A deficiency (VAD) was highest in Sub-Saharan Africa (48%; 25–75) and South Asia (44%; 13–79)’: if 25-75, 13-59 mean CI or other, please specify

Methods and materials

- I suggest the authors revise ‘Source and study populations’ and ‘Data collection tools and procedures’ as some parts were overlapped and it is not easy to understand

- Some important information is missing regarding the data source- for instance, how did this study handle missing data and what was the survey response rate?

- Outcome variable: as it is critical part in the manuscript, the authors need to provide enough details such as who responded to the question, what were the seven food items and what was the justification to define poor consumption of vitamin A

- Predictor variables: It is not clear how the authors considered possible multicollinearity

- It is not clear how the authors considered complex survey design

- Data management and analysis: didn’t the author also use Kuldorff’s SaTScan version 9.6 software, Arc GIS 10.7 software and MGWR (Multi-scale Geographically Weighted Regression)? If then, please indicate in addition to STATA and Excel

- It is not clear what was done for model validity and uncertainty assessment. Please provide details.

- Ethical consideration: better to clearly say that ethical approval was not required for what reason.

Results

- Be consistent with presenting numbers- up to two decimals, one or? i.e. 18.45%, 61%

- Table 1: the authors need to explain how variables were classified in the ‘Methods’ section. For instance, how household wealth was classified into poor, middle and rich? Is it solely based on household income or with other assets? Please explain what Dega means. Also, how ‘media exposure’ was defined?

- How about the associations with other variables such as - education, religion, occupation, child age, etc. and outcome? Please also specify if the association were not significant

Discussion

- It is not clear what the first paragraph is trying to say

- The last sentence on page 19 needs more elaboration- how dietary preference, low practice to complementary feeding or socioeconomic status differ by regions and how it could explain geographical variation of vitamin A consumption. Same goes for the last sentence on page 20.

- It is not clear what ‘The possible reason might be household with poor wealth did not get minimum meal frequency to their child and poor wealth will affect adherent to the consumption of foods rich in vitamin A and dietary diversity to their child.’ means, please specify.

- The authors could have provided comprehensive comparison with other studies to strengthen the discussion part. For instance, what were the results of other similar studies examining spatial distribution of food consumption or nutrition/health status? How similar or different were the results and what would be the possible reasons for that?

- The authors listed one limitation but there might be more – for instance, how food consumption was defined as poor or good? Was amount of food considered? Was there any possibility of recall bias?

References

- Need revision. For instance, #3 ref: (World Health Orgnaisation) is repeated

- #10 ref: year is repeated twice like ‘J Nutr Metab. 2013;2013’

There are some grammar and flow issues so I recommend copyediting. Below are some examples

- Venerable: do you mean vulnerable? (appeared several times in abstract, result)

- The following sentence on p9 is not clear- On the other hand, only 12 to 24% of children age 6-23 months consumed animal source foods rich in vitamin A in Ethiopia (6,12), however, eggs (11.0%) and meat (2.6%) were less frequently consumed (8).

- p20 …male frequency and Nepal which is Children from the poorest… did you mean ‘meal’?

- p21 .. The expectation of the finding of hos spot maps in line.. did you mean ‘hot’?

- p21 …This study focuses on typical consumption of foods rich in vitamin A.Tthe association between….

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Jun 3;16(6):e0252639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252639.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


30 Dec 2020

Response to Reviewers’‎

Spatial distribution and geographical heterogeneity factors ‎associated with poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A ‎among children aged 6 -23 months in Ethiopia: Geographical ‎weighted regression analysis ‎

Sofonyas Abebaw Tiruneh1*, Dawit Tefera Fentie2, Seblewongel Tigabu Yigizaw 2, Asnakew ‎Asmamaw Abebe2, Kassahun Alemu Gelaye2.‎

The authors, extending our great thanks for the editors and reviewers for this manuscript as the ‎stand of this review. The comments raised by the reviewers and editors are vital and defiantly it ‎will improve the quality of the manuscript. We have addressed all the issues raised by the ‎reviewers and editors point-by-point response and believed that the revised version of the ‎manuscript is satisfactory and will meet the journal publication requirements. As well, the journal ‎requirements amended accordingly the journal submission guideline. Please note that words and ‎sentences highlighted by Areal font under the reviewers' question and comment were the authors' ‎response and reaction for each issue. ‎

Stay Safe!!!‎

The Authors.‎

Review Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: It is an interesting article whose findings can help policymakers and health planners ‎to select appropriate interventions. The methodology used can be also used to identify hot spot ‎areas of low consumption of vitamin A and its determinants not only in Ethiopia but also in other ‎Sub-Sahara Africa countries. However, there are some caveats and extensive editing of English ‎language and style will be needed to facilitate the reading of the whole document.‎

Thank you for the comment!‎

Background

It is difficult to follow the different paragraph, although the background section provides ‎sufficient information and include relevant references. The background section needs to be ‎reorganized. It will be helpful to combine some paragraphs. For example, the first three ‎paragraphs can be reduced to one.‎

Noted! Modified accordingly!‎

Results

Table 1: Since the study is related to children, it will be better to present children characteristics ‎before the mothers’ results.‎

Noted Thank you! it was corrected accordingly. ‎

Discussion

It will be important not to repeat most of results in the discussion section.‎

The consumption status of Foods rich in Vitamin A among children age 6-23 months was ‎determined using a 24-hour recall. The results need to be analyzed with precaution, as it does not ‎reflect any dietary habits. Thus, it needs to be highlighted in Discussion.‎

It will be helpful to give some examples of regional variation dietary preference, low practice to ‎complementary feeding, or socioeconomic status.‎

References for this confirmation: The possible justification might be living in rural area had no ‎access to get foods rich in vitamin A, poor knowledge about foods rich in vitamin A, and other ‎socioeconomic factors.‎

‎ Thank You! it was confirmed. ‎

Reviewer #2: This study aimed to assess the spatial distribution and its determinants of dietary ‎consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6-23 months in Ethiopia. It could ‎provide valuable information to identify areas with high vitamin A deficiency. However, there ‎are a number of issues to be addressed.‎

Thank you for the comment!‎

Abstract

‎- Methods: please specify how poor vitamin A consumption was defined

Noted! Corrected accordingly!‎

Background

‎- Need references for the sentence ‘So far, different studies conducted in Ethiopia to assess ‎dietary diversity among children including foods rich in vitamin A consumption’.‎

Noted corrected accordingly. ‎

‎- The authors presented the importance of vitamin A in the background. However, the ‎background regarding geospatial analysis is relatively weak. The authors should provide more ‎details to strengthen the justification of this study. For instance, the authors indicated that there ‎was no evidence on geospatial distribution of dietary consumption in Ethiopia. However, ‎relevant studies were done from other countries so it would be informative to add- what is the ‎current knowledge on geospatial distribution of dietary intake, specifically in Africa, what is the ‎gap and how this study could contribute to the existing body of evidence. Also, if there is no ‎study on spatial distribution of dietary consumption of foods rich in vitamin A, it would be still ‎useful to add studies in Ethiopia targeting other nutrients or other nutrition outcomes such as ‎stunting and wasting.‎

Thank you for your insight. It was modified accordingly. Even though there is no ‎geostatistical evidence in vitamin A rich food consumption, it will be fair to discuss ‎other nutrition status studies. ‎

‎- ‘The magnitude of vitamin A deficiency (VAD) was highest in Sub-Saharan Africa (48%; 25–‎‎75) and South Asia (44%; 13–79)’: if 25-75, 13-59 mean CI or other, please specify‎

Thank you! it was compared with other countries or continents from the evidence of the ‎study. ‎

‎ ‎

Methods and materials

‎- I suggest the authors revise ‘Source and study populations’ and ‘Data collection tools and ‎procedures’ as some parts were overlapped and it is not easy to understand

It was corrected accordingly. Since the data were secondary, the method of data ‎collection copied from the source file. ‎

‎- Some important information is missing regarding the data source- for instance, how did this ‎study handle missing data and what was the survey response rate?‎

The missing data by nature system missing. After extraction from the original dataset ‎missing data was not a problem. This data set has system missing and it was done ‎complicate case analysis. Regarding the survey response rate, so far the data were ‎nationally representative survey and it was calculated proportionally for each region. ‎Therefore, the survey was conducted in 16,650 residential households, 5,232 in urban ‎areas and 11,418 in rural areas. The sample was expected to generate an estimated ‎‎16,663 completed interviews with women age 15-49, 5,514 in urban areas and 11,149 ‎in rural areas, and 14,195 completed interviews with men age 15-59, with 4,472 in ‎urban areas and 9,723 in rural areas.‎

‎- Outcome variable: as it is critical part in the manuscript, the authors need to provide enough ‎details such as who responded to the question, what were the seven food items and what was the ‎justification to define poor consumption of vitamin A

Thank you for your insight. It was corrected accordingly the comment. The operation ‎definition was clearly stated in the manuscript. The seven food items were: Egg, Meat, ‎Vegetables, Green leafy vegetables, Fruits, Organ meat, and Fish. If the mothers or ‎caregivers respond for their child at least one food ‎item among the seven food items at ‎any time in the last 24 hours preceding the interview was ‎declared good consumption ‎of foods rich in vitamin A, if not poor consumption. ‎

‎- Predictor variables: It is not clear how the Authors considered possible multicollinearity.‎

Multicollinearity was considered for each independent variable was checked using ‎ArcGIS explanatory analysis. Therefore, all independent variables multicollinearity ‎‎(Variance Inflation Factor <7.5) from the explanatory analysis. ‎

‎- It is not clear how the authors considered complex survey design

The study design is multistage. The design was not selected by the authors because it ‎is secondary data. ‎

‎- Data management and analysis: didn’t the author also use Kuldorff’s SaTScan version 9.6 ‎software, Arc GIS 10.7 software and MGWR (Multi-scale Geographically Weighted ‎Regression)? If then, please indicate in addition to STATA and Excel

The data management (data cleaning) was done using STATA software and Microsoft ‎Excel. But spatial analysis was performed using Kuldorff’s SaTScan version 9.6 ‎software, Arc GIS 10.7 software and MGWR software. ‎

‎- It is not clear what was done for model validity and uncertainty assessment. Please provide ‎details.‎

The model validity assessment was assessed using AICc for best fit model selection.‎

‎ ‎

‎- Ethical consideration: better to clearly say that ethical approval was not required for what ‎reason.‎

The ethical clearance was weived form DHS data archivist after requesting a concept ‎paper. The dataset was publically available after submitted to a concept paper. ‎

‎ ‎

Results

‎- Be consistent with presenting numbers- up to two decimals, one or? i.e. 18.45%, 61%‎

Noted. thank you! corrected accordingly! But for the case of "61% of mothers and 45% ‎of husbands, 88% of children, and 45% " since it is numbering person rounding to the ‎nearest integer is appropriate. ‎

‎- Table 1: the authors need to explain how variables were classified in the ‘Methods’ section. For ‎instance, how household wealth was classified into poor, middle and rich? Is it solely based on ‎household income or with other assets?‎

The original dataset (secondary data) classify the wealth status of the household was ‎classified as poorest, poor, middle, rich, and richest. For further analysis (Modelling) it ‎was recategorized as Poor (Poorest and poor), middle, and rich (Rich and richest).‎

‎ Please explain what Dega means.‎

The altitude was classified as into three categories. which as, Kolla (Tropical zone) - is ‎below 1830 metres in elevation, Woina dega (Subtropical zone) - includes the ‎highlands areas of 1830 - 2440 metres, and Dega (Cool zone) - is above 2440 metres ‎in elevation. According to this classification, the Continous variable categorized as ‎such. ‎

And it will include in the operational definition. ‎

‎ Also, how ‘media exposure’ was defined?‎

The operation definition for media exposure declared as if the respondent has to ‎access to listen to either radio or television said to be having media exposure. ‎

‎- How about the associations with other variables such as - education, religion, occupation, child ‎age, etc. and outcome? Please also specify if the association were not significant

‎ Noted! These variables are not significant spatially with the outcome variable at P-‎value < 0.05. though it is no need to discuss. ‎

Discussion

‎- It is not clear what the first paragraph is trying to say.‎

The first paragraph is said to be restating the prevalence of vitamin A-rich foods ‎consumption among the study groups for internal comparison. ‎

‎- The last sentence on page 19 needs more elaboration- how dietary preference, low practice to ‎complementary feeding or socioeconomic status differ by regions and how it could explain the ‎geographical variation of vitamin A consumption. Same goes for the last sentence on page 20.‎

Noted. Thank you. This sentence elaborates the situational feeding practice of the ‎Ethiopian population. Ethiopia is a multi diversity and multiethnicity country which has ‎different regions and nation and nationalities across each region. Besides, Ethiopia ‎has four agrarian regions and five pastoralist region. Therefore the way to accessibility, ‎cultural practice on their feeding will differ across this situation. Then, this might be a ‎possible justification for the geographical variation of feeding practice among their ‎child. ‎

‎- It is not clear what ‘The possible reason might be household with poor wealth did not get ‎minimum meal frequency to their child and poor wealth will affect adherent to the consumption ‎of foods rich in vitamin A and dietary diversity to their child.’ means, please specify.‎

Noted, As we know poor wealth affects the affordability of foods for their family. ‎Therefore, households with poor wealth status will be food insecure for their family. ‎Then, this possible explanation will relate to this scenario. And, we put this regard as a ‎possible explanation for poor Vitamin A rich food consumption about. ‎

‎ ‎

‎- The authors could have provided comprehensive comparison with other studies to strengthen ‎the discussion part. For instance, what were the results of other similar studies examining the ‎spatial distribution of food consumption or nutrition/health status? How similar or different were ‎the results and what would be the possible reasons for that?‎

Noted! In such regard, there is no sufficient study on the spatial distribution of vitamin ‎A rich food consumption. But, we try to make a comparison as maximum potential.‎

‎- The authors listed one limitation but there might be more – for instance, how food consumption ‎was defined as poor or good? Was amount of food considered? Was there any possibility of ‎recall bias?‎

Thank you, we correct accordingly. ‎

‎ ‎

References

‎- Need revision. For instance, #3 ref: (World Health Orgnaisation) is repeated

‎- #10 ref: year is repeated twice like ‘J Nutr Metab. 2013;2013’‎

Thank You! we correct accordingly. ‎

There are some grammar and flow issues so I recommend copyediting. Below are some examples

‎- Venerable: do you mean vulnerable? (appeared several times in abstract, result)‎

‎- The following sentence on p9 is not clear- On the other hand, only 12 to 24% of children age 6-‎‎23 months consumed animal source foods rich in vitamin A in Ethiopia (6,12), however, eggs ‎‎(11.0%) and meat (2.6%) were less frequently consumed (8).‎

‎- p20 …male frequency and Nepal which is Children from the poorest… did you mean ‘meal’?‎

‎- p21 .. The expectation of the finding of hos spot maps in line.. did you mean ‘hot’?‎

‎- p21 …This study focuses on typical consumption of foods rich in vitamin A.Tthe association ‎between….

Noted! Thank You very much for your bird eye view review for this manuscript. ‎

Thank you for your constructive comment!!!‎

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Andrew Amos Channon

8 Apr 2021

PONE-D-20-16369R1

Spatial distribution and geographical heterogeneity factors associated with poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children age 6 -23 months in Ethiopia: Geographical weighted regression analysis

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Tiruneh,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

The manuscript has been greatly improved from the preceeding submission, as can be seen from the reviewer comments. However there are still some outstanding issues that need to be addressed before a final decision can be made. These are:

  • There are still major issues with the English language at various points in the manuscript - please make sure that there is a further round of proof-reading before resubmission

  • The reviewer comments need to be addressed in full

  • The first introductory paragraph (p3) highlights what Vitamin A is. The information about its uses is not referred back to in the rest of the document, so it is strongly suggested to remove this information, or not to put about rhodopsin etc in the first paragraph. The paper is about the spatial distribution and determinants of low Vitamin A, and not about the biology behind it so the introduction (and whole paper) should reflect this.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 23 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Andrew Amos Channon, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: Congratulations on this work. It looks great and please see minor comments below.

• In Introduction, the newly cited article by Pardede et al seems irrelevant (ref 15).

• Lines 356-360: the authors mentioned that ‘This finding is not similar to a study done in Ethiopia, which found that the wealth status of the household is not statistically significant for the consumption of foods rich in vitamin A’. It would be valuable if authors elaborate more regarding the inconsistencies.

• Don’t need to cite figures again in discussion. No need to repeat the results – you can highlight the key findings and provide some insights.

• Review again the list of figures and numbering (fig 3 appeared twice in the list and some figures were numbered as figure 1).

• It seems that the editing wasn’t done for final version of the manuscript because there are still some errors in edited parts.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Jun 3;16(6):e0252639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252639.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


17 May 2021

Response to Reviewers

Spatial distribution and geographical heterogeneity factors associated with poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children aged 6 -23 months in Ethiopia: Geographical weighted regression analysis

Sofonyas Abebaw Tiruneh1*, Dawit Tefera Fentie2, Seblewongel Tigabu Yigizaw 2, Asnakew Asmamaw Abebe2, Kassahun Alemu Gelaye2.

The authors, extending our great thanks to the editors and reviewers for this manuscript as the stand of this review. The comments raised by the reviewers and editors are vital and defiantly it will improve the quality of the manuscript. Please note that texts and sentences underneath the reviewer’s question and/or comment is the authors' response and reaction to each issue.

Stay Safe!!!

The Authors.

Reviewer’s comment and question

Reviewer #2:

Congratulations on this work. It looks greatthe and please see minor comments below.

Noted Thank you

In the introduction, the newly cited article by Pardede et al seems irrelevant (ref 15).

Thank you corrected accordingly.

• Lines 356-360: the authors mentioned that ‘This finding is not similar to a study done in Ethiopia, which found that the wealth status of the household is not statistically significant for the consumption of foods rich in vitamin A’. It would be valuable if authors elaborate more regarding the inconsistencies.

Thank you.

• Don’t need to cite figures again in discussion. No need to repeat the results – you can highlight the key findings and provide some insights.

Thank you! This might be the study period, sample size, and area difference.

• Review again the list of figures and numbering (fig 3 appeared twice in the list to and some figures were numbered as figure 1).

Thank you corrected accordingly.

• It seems that the editing wasn’t done for the final version of the manuscript because there are still some errors in the edited parts.

Corrected.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

Thank you for your review.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Andrew Amos Channon

20 May 2021

Spatial distribution and geographical heterogeneity factors associated with poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children age 6 - 23 months in Ethiopia: Geographical weighted regression analysis

PONE-D-20-16369R2

Dear Dr. Tiruneh,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Andrew Amos Channon, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Andrew Amos Channon

24 May 2021

PONE-D-20-16369R2

</i>Spatial distribution and geographical heterogeneity factors associated with poor consumption of foods rich in vitamin A among children age 6 - 23 months in Ethiopia: Geographical weighted regression analysis</i>

Dear Dr. Tiruneh:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Andrew Amos Channon

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File

    (RAR)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and/or Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES