Abstract
Distinct from cardiac PET performed with preparation to control physiological FDG uptake in the myocardium, standard FDG-PET/CT performed with 4–6 h of fasting will show variation in myocardial FDG uptake. For this reason, important signs of myocardial and pericardial abnormality revealed by myocardial FDG uptake tend to be overlooked. However, recognition of possible underlying disease will support further patient management to avoid complications due to the disease. This review demonstrates the mechanism of FDG uptake in the myocardium, discusses the factors affecting uptake, and provides notable image findings that may suggest underlying disease.
Keywords: FDG, PET/CT, Myocardium, Physiological uptake, GLUT
Introduction
For the better assessment of myocardial disease, long fasting or a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet prior to 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has been performed to suppress the physiological FDG uptake in the myocardium. However, standard PET/computed tomography (CT) performed with 4–6 h of fasting cannot control the physiological FDG uptake in the myocardium, thus variety of myocardial FDG uptake is observed. Even it is challenging to distinguish from physiological FDG uptake, important signs of myocardial and pericardial abnormality can be revealed by standard FDG-PET/CT. This review presents the mechanism of FDG uptake in the myocardium, discusses the factors affecting uptake, and provides notable image findings that may suggest underlying disease.
Mechanism of FDG uptake in the myocardium
The energy requirements of the myocardium are supplied mainly by fatty acids (FA), carbohydrates, and ketone bodies [1]. The glucose metabolism status of the myocardium changes according to the available substrate and myocardial function and perfusion. When plasma glucose and insulin levels rise, glucose transporters (GLUT) in the myocardium (GLUT-1 and GLUT-4) increase the myocardial glucose intake. In the fasting state, plasma insulin levels fall and cardiac energy requirements are supplied mainly by FA following the reduction in oxidative glucose metabolism obtained from carbohydrates [2]. To reduce physiological FDG uptake in the myocardium, 18–24 h fasting is required, because the human myocardium preferentially utilizes energy derived from free fatty acids rather than from glucose during the fasting state in aerobic conditions. Standard FDG-PET/CT imaging protocols generally require at least 4–6 h of fasting before the examination. Accordingly, the metabolic shift in the myocardium is not completely accomplished, and a variety of myocardial physiological uptake patterns are present in standard FDG-PET/CT [3].
Factors affecting myocardial FDG uptake
Major factors affecting myocardial glucose metabolism include sex differences, aging, obesity, and diabetic mellitus. Compared with the male myocardium, the female myocardium requires more oxygen and FA, and less glucose. Metabolic change also occurs in pathological states such as obesity, diabetic mellitus, and nonischemic cardiomyopathy [4]. Estrogen upregulates nitric oxide synthesis, leading to a reduction in GLUT-4 translocation to the cell surface [5, 6]. The higher percentage of body fat in females than males leads to higher plasma FA levels and incorporation of FA to the heart in females [4, 7]. Structural changes in the myocardium such as increased myocyte size and fibrosis show progression with age. The contribution of FA oxidation to myocardial metabolism decreases with age for multifactorial reasons related to mitochondrial status, free radical injury, a decline in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) activity, and increased pyruvate oxidation [8–12].
An increase in body mass index leads to increased myocardial FA metabolism. In females, the dependence on myocardial FA metabolism increases with worsening insulin resistance, with little change in myocardial glucose metabolism; and myocardial volume oxygen consumption is greater in obese females than in obese males. In contrast, obese males have greater impairment of myocardial glucose metabolism than obese females at the same level of plasma insulin, suggesting greater myocardial insulin resistance [13].
Systemic insulin resistance induces an increase in plasma FA delivery, leading to stimulation of FA intake to the myocardium. The increased FA metabolism and decreased glucose use that occurs in diabetic mellitus is related to the proliferator-activated receptor coactivator 1 alfa signaling network and protein kinase C [14].
Blood glucose level does not directly correlate with physiological myocardial FDG uptake [15]. Renal failure have no influence on physiological myocardial FDG uptake 16]. Physiological FDG uptake in the myocardium varies among patients and even in the same patient at different time points during scanning, which appears to be related to the patient’s metabolic and hormonal status at the time of scanning [17].
Myocardial FDG uptake can be influenced by bezafibrate, levothyroxine, thiazolidinedione, and benzodiazepine [18, 19]. Bezafibrate reduces serum triglyceride levels by altering lipoprotein metabolism [20, 21], and also lowers blood glucose, HbA1C, and insulin resistance in attenuating the progression of diabetic mellitus type 2. The expression of glucose transporters and activity of phosphofructokinase-1 is decreased in hypothyroid rats [22, 23]. The thyroid hormone levothyroxine can stimulate glucose transport and glycolysis by upregulating GLUT-4 transcription [24], and decreased myocardial FDG uptake has been reported in patients prescribed levothyroxine [19]. Thiazolidinediones are ligands for PPARγ, which regulates adipocyte differentiation and glucose homeostasis by improving insulin sensitivity and secretion, glucose tolerance, and adipocytokines in patients with diabetic mellitus type 2 [25, 26]. This mechanism might be associated with reduced FDG uptake in the myocardium. Benzodiazepine receptors are present in the central nervous system and in peripheral tissue, including the myocardium [27], but the detailed mechanism of increased FDG uptake in the myocardium remains unknown.
Myocardial uptake variability
The physiological FDG uptake pattern in the myocardium is classified as focal, regional, diffuse type, or none [15, 18, 28]. As it is not dependent on age, glucose level, weight, or FDG dose, the uptake pattern will be poorly-reproducible in the following PET examination. Regional FDG activity is generally lower in the septum and anterior left ventricular (LV) wall than in the lateral and posterior walls [3, 17, 29, 30]. An experimental animal study found that wall stresses were highest in the anterior, lateral, and anterior papillary regions of the myocardium, which suggests that increased myocardial wall stress leads to increased metabolic demand [31]. Predominant regional FDG uptake in the base of the myocardium is also a common physiologic uptake pattern [28], occurring as ring pattern, over-half-ring pattern, and spot pattern (including focal in diffuse FDG uptake) [32] (Fig. 1).
A focal FDG uptake pattern is sometimes confirmed as accumulation in the LV papillary muscles in their anterolateral and infero-posterior locations, where it is commonly observed in combination with FDG uptake in the adjacent myocardium (Fig. 2). In contrast, isolated FDG uptake in the papillary muscle is rare, and may suggest thrombus or neoplasm [33].
The basal segment FDG activity was present in 57% of all subjects, comprising increased basal-lateral (54%), postero-basal (32%), basal-anterior-basal (15%), and basal (15%) septum patterns [18]. Nose et al. found that the FDG uptake pattern in subjects without heart disease was none in 28%, diffuse in 34%, focal/diffuse in 21%, and focal in 18% [34]. Focal uptake was seen most commonly in the basal wall. Uptake pattern was not influenced by age, blood glucose level, body weight, or injected dose of FDG. Based on the coronary branch territories, mean uptake was higher in the left circumflex coronary artery than right coronary artery (RCA) territories, and lower in the left coronary artery than RCA territories. A basal–apical gradient analysis showed that uptake was significantly higher in the middle territories than in the proximal and distal territories [29].
Normal variant finding
Crista terminalis
The crista terminalis is a smooth, crescent-shaped muscle band that separates the right atrium (RA) from the right atrial appendage [35]. It originates from regression of the septum spurium as the sinus venosus is incorporated into the right atrial wall. Its thickness varies widely among adults (3–6 mm) [36]. The sinoatrial node lies on the upper part of the RA, and its identification is important in cardiac electrophysiology examinations [37]. Because this muscular band occasionally shows increased FDG uptake, it should not be misinterpreted as myocardial tumor, thrombus, or focal pericardial metastases [38, 39] (Fig. 3).
Lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum
Lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum (LHIS) is a benign condition with prevalence of 1–8% that is associated with aging, sex (female), and obesity [40]. LHIS has a dumbbell-shaped appearance with significant thickening of the interatrial septum, with 20 mm or more showing with fat density on CT that extends to the atrial wall but rarely to the interventricular septum, and sparing of the fossa ovalis [41, 42]. It is composed of mature adipocytes and fetal fat cells or brown fat, and FDG uptake is thought to be dependent on the volume of brown adipose tissue (BAT) [43, 44] (Fig. 4). BAT is an adipose organ that functions to maintain core temperature in small mammals and in newborn humans [45]; however, FDG uptake representing the metabolic activity of BAT proves its existence also in adult humans [46]. Most subjects with LHIS are asymptomatic, but it is known to be associated with supraventricular arrhythmias, syncope, and sudden death [47, 48]. A previous study found that in 82% of these patients, focal increased FDG uptake corresponding to the regions of LHIS [44]. Brown fat is sometimes apparent as focal areas of FDG uptake that are localized to the mediastinum around the pericardium and epicardium in up to 1–2% of patients [49], which can be mistaken as mediastinal adenopathy or malignant pericardial infiltration.
Myocardial finding
FDG uptake in the atrial wall
FDG uptake is not usually seen in the atrial wall because of its much lower energy consumption compared with the ventricles. Increased FDG activity along with or localized in the atrial wall (including the atrial appendage) is associated with atrial fibrillation (AF), even in the case of cardiac chamber enlargement. However, not all patients with AF show increased FDG activity in the atrial wall [50, 51] (Fig. 5).
Xie et al. proposed that activity in the epicardial adipose tissue was an independent factor predicting increased activity in the atrium [50]. Joseph et al. showed a relationship between higher hematopoietic tissue activation and the incidence of AF [52].
The incidence of AF was significant associated with SUVmax of FDG in the RA and volume of the left atrium (LA). Moreover, a pathological investigation reported infiltration of extravascular macrophages and lymphocytes in regions with FDG uptake in the atrium [53]. Sinigaglia et al. reported a strong association of FDG uptake in the right and LA with increased prevalence of stroke in patients with AF [54].
Increased FDG uptake in the right ventricle
Diffuse FDG uptake in the right ventricle (RV) has been identified in the setting of increased ventricular pressure or overload in patients with pulmonary hypertension (Fig. 6). Enlargement of the LV and RV with a diffuse increase in FDG myocardial activity is seen in association with systemic hypertension, valvular heart disease, and other myopathies [55–58] (Fig. 6). When atrial FDG uptake is confirmed in an enlarged atrium accompanied by diffuse uptake in the RV, atrial FDG uptake can also be considered to be caused by increased pressure or overload [58], and the increased level is a marker of poorer prognosis [59]. In our experience, FDG uptake in the RV is more frequently seen in healthy young adults, but the mechanism is unclear.
Myocardial hypertrophy
The expression of beta-oxidation enzymes is decreased as myocardial hypertrophy progresses, leading to decreased myocardial FA as glucose use increases in the myocardium. Therefore, myocardial FDG uptake increases in left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and the uptake is reported to be more prominent in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy than in hypertrophic nonobstructive cardiomyopathy [60] (Fig. 7). In contrast, FDG uptake in the myocardium can decrease in patients with LVH if the metabolic remodeling proceeds as structural remodeling in the form of LVH. The decrease in diastolic function leads to a decline in FDG uptake. The reduction of FDG uptake in progressive LVH that is caused by underlying tissue characterization such as fibrosis indicates the risk of myocardium progressing to heart failure [61–63].
Focal FDG uptake in the left ventricular apex
Focal FDG uptake in the LV apex is a rare finding, occurring up to 0.6% of oncologic FDG-PET/CT scans [64, 65]. A previous study reported that 55% of subjects with focal FDG uptake in the LV apex had coronary artery stenosis or a history of treatment for coronary disease (Fig. 8), and that 10% had apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [64]. Takanami et al. reported the ‘focal high’ and ‘focal defect on diffuse high’ pattern of myocardial FDG uptake in the LV apex were correlated with abnormal myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) [66]. Haider et al. observed focal myocardial FDG uptake (not limited to the apex) in patients with myocardial abnormalities such as abnormal perfusion, impaired LV ejection fraction (LVEF), myocardial ischemia, and scarring. In addition, focal myocardial FDG uptake has been identified as a strong predictor of abnormal myocardial function/perfusion and as an independent predictor of ongoing ischemia and myocardial scarring [67].
Increased FDG uptake can persist for 48 h after stress-induced myocardial ischemia in stable coronary artery disease [68, 69]. Dou et al. reported that ‘focal’ or ‘focal on diffuse’ uptake was seen in 86% of patients with unstable angina but in only 8% of patients without unstable angina [70]. However, it has also been shown that abnormal MPI is possible even in the case of low FDG uptake (44%) and basal ring uptake (43%), although less commonly for basal ring pattern (11%) [66]. Akikawa et al. reported an incidental finding of focal myocardial FDG uptake, indicating asymptomatic coronary artery disease, which disappeared following successful percutaneous coronary intervention [71].
Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is another possible cause of focal FDG uptake in the LV apex (Fig. 8). Its characteristic appearance is an unusual pattern of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with wall thickening limited to the apex of the LV. Focal FDG uptake in the LV apex shows a tendency to occur more frequently in patients with the echocardiography findings of apical wall thickness ≥ 15 mm and asynergy in the apex. FDG uptake in the LV apex is seen in patients with decreased coronary flow reserve, indicating an association with microvascular dysfunction [65].
Localized FDG uptake in the left ventricle
A shift from fatty acid metabolism to glucose utilization in the myocardium occurs in ischemia. Based on this mechanism, increased FDG uptake in the LV wall can be recognized in the case of chronic ischemia, termed hibernating myocardium [72]. Localized FDG uptake is more likely to indicate an ischemic state if the uptake corresponds to the coronary artery distribution (Fig. 9). Physiological FDG uptake in the posterolateral wall can mimic ischemia in the left circumflex coronary artery [18], whereas decreased or absent FDG uptake indicates myocardial scarring with irreversible functional damage [73] (Fig. 10). A reduction of septal FDG uptake has also been observed in left bundle branch block (LBBB) [74].
Decreased FDG uptake also occurs during the time course of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy [75] (Fig. 10). In the acute and subacute phases, FDG defects are demonstrated in the hypo-contractile LV segments even if perfusion is only slightly reduced. Later, there is rapid normalization of myocardial perfusion, whereas recovery of glucose metabolism is delayed. Although stress-induced catecholamine overproduction and myocardial response are the most important mechanisms [76], coronary microvascular dysfunction may cause transient perfusion abnormalities, whereas excessive catecholamine exposure induces toxic effects in cardiomyocytes, including abnormalities such as glucose metabolism disorder [77]. Representative causes of excessive catecholamine are pheochromocytoma, stress, medications, and ingestion of exogenous substances [78].
History of chemotherapy or radiation therapy
Diffuse and increased FDG accumulation in the myocardium is a possible early sign of cardiotoxicity, which has been reported in patients treated with anthracyclines such as doxorubicin and adriamycin [79–83], tyrosine kinase inhibitors [84], and trastuzumab [83, 85] (Fig. 11). Increased FDG uptake in the myocardium during chemotherapy including doxorubicin is associated with a decline in LVEF [83]. The cardiac FDG uptake has been shown to progressively increase during therapy administration and remain elevated for at least 1 year [82]. Doxorubicin inhibits fatty acid oxidation and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation [86], leading to Pasteur effect and further increasing glucose consumption. Because the increase in glucose consumption is transient and disappears rapidly after drug removal [87], Bauckneht et al. suggested the capability of FDG for selectively tracking the early endoplasmic reticulum pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) response to oxidative stress [81].
Increased myocardial FDG uptake has been reported following radiation therapy for esophageal cancer [88–90] and lung cancer [91]. In this setting, FDG uptake has the feature of unusual sharp borders that correlate with the area of heart involved in the radiation therapy planning field, rather than following a typical coronary artery distribution [92]. Localized myocarditis with increased FDG activity generally occur at radiation doses > 35 Gy [88]. In an animal study, increased FDG uptake caused by radiation-induced myocardial damage appeared to reflect microvascular damage and mitochondrial injury [93].
Possibility of endocarditis
Endocarditis is a life-threatening inflammation of the inner lining of the heart (the endocardium), and infectious endocarditis (IE) on both native valve and prosthetic valve (PVE), and cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are representative diseases. Meta-analyses showed that the overall pooled sensitivity of FDG PET/CT for the indication of IE and PVE is 61% and 73%, respectively [94]. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommend using FDG-PET/CT for the diagnosis of endocarditis, expecting the reduction in the rate of misdiagnosed IE, classified in the Possible IE category with the Duke criteria [95, 96]. In addition to the detection of endocarditis, whole-body PET/CT images can contribute to peripheral embolization and/or metastatic infection [97]. Focal FDG uptake in the valve and devices indeed have possibly of the active endocarditis; however, physiological myocardial FDG uptake and overcorrection artifacts caused by metal artifacts may be a misinterpretation of the disease [98]. Non-specific FDG uptake in the immediate postoperative period can mimic the disease, thus the ESC guidelines stated that FDG PET result is not reliable within 3 months from prosthetic valve implantation [95].
Incidence of cardiac sarcoidosis
Sarcoidosis is a systemic disorder of unknown etiology, characterized by the presence of noncaseating granulomas. Cardiac involvement occurs in only about 5% of those with systemic sarcoidosis, but leads to an adverse prognosis that causes approximately 25% of deaths from sarcoidosis. According to pathologic assessment, the presence of occult cardiac granulomas is around 20–58% in the patient with sarcoidosis, which is much higher than might be expected [99–101]. The uptake patterns of patchy nonhomogeneous FDG uptake or focal-on-diffuse FDG uptake under the suppression of physiological myocardial uptake indicate the existence of active cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), and perfusion imaging can increase the accuracy of diagnosis [99]. The presence of clinical symptoms related to CS and positive findings outside the myocardium suggestive of sarcoidosis can improve the diagnostic accuracy (Fig. 12).
The prevalence of isolated cardiac sarcoidosis (ICS), or sarcoidosis that involves only the heart, occurs in 3.1–25% of cases of CS [102]. Therefore, CS is generally an extra cardiac sarcoid lesion that can be differentiated from cardiac sarcoidosis by the finding of patchy nonhomogeneous FDG uptake or focal-on-diffuse FDG uptake.
Possibility of cardiac tumor
The vast majority of cardiac tumors are secondary tumors caused by metastatic spread or by direct neoplastic invasion. Secondary tumors are 20–40 times more common than primary cardiac tumors [103–106]. Up to 12% of oncology patients have metastases to the heart or pericardium at autopsy, although most remain clinically silent [107]. Melanoma, breast, lung, and esophageal carcinomas are the most common to metastasize to the heart.
Primary cardiac tumors occur with a reported frequency of 0.0017–0.33% of the population, among which 75–90% are benign, and of which cardiac myxomas account for almost one half [108–110]. Cardiac myxomas have the typical appearance of a polypoid left intracavitary mass rather than a right atrial mass originating from the interatrial septum, and characteristically display either no significant or mildly elevated FDG uptake [18, 28, 108, 111] (Fig. 13). Common complications of myxoma such as valvular obstruction and embolism, as well as more generalized symptoms, may help identifying the tumor.
Cardiac lipoma is well-circumscribed spherical or elliptical mass composed of homogeneous yellow fat and located most commonly in the epicardium, but can be distributed in other areas of the heart such as the endocardium and myocardium [112]. Lipomas show no intense FDG uptake. Other possible benign tumors are fibroma and rhabdomyoma, which are most common in children.
Approximately 5–25% of primary cardiac tumors are malignant [107, 108], most of which show intense FDG uptake and SUVmax of 3.5–5 can be optimal cut off value for distinguishing malignant from benign cardiac tumor [113, 114]. Cardiac sarcoma is the most common primary malignant tumor of the myocardium (~ 65% of malignant primary cardiac tumors), of which angiosarcoma accounts for more than 33% [106, 107, 115]. Angiosarcoma is a highly aggressive and infiltrative tumor, located most commonly in the RA and pericardium, and shows high FDG uptake [113]. Liposarcoma [116] and myeloid sarcoma [117] have been reported as FDG-avid lesions arising in the myocardium, whereas osteosarcoma [118] is FDG-avid lesions located in the pericardium.
Primary cardiac lymphomas (PCL) are an uncommon malignancy, accounting for 1.3% of primary cardiac tumors, rather it is much higher incidence as extensive lesion from the other [119]. PCL are generally of the aggressive B-cell lymphoma type, and most commonly involve the right side of the heart, particularly the right atrium. Cardiac lymphomas are characterized by significant FDG uptake due to their aggressive nature [120, 121] (Fig. 14). No intraluminal involvement regardless of surroundings of coronary artery may help the diagnosis of cardiac lymphomas. The other possible FDG-avid malignant lesion is leukemia such as extramedullary AML extending to the myocardium and pericardium, which used to be a clinically undetectable extramedullary lesion [122]. The value of FDG-PET/CT is its ability to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors and to optimize the biopsy location.
Possibility of cardiac amyloidosis
High and diffuse myocardial FDG uptake has been reported in patients with immunoglobulin-derived light chain (AL) amyloidosis deposits in the myocardium [123, 124]. Due to the small number of reports and similarity to physiological uptake, the typical uptake pattern in cardiac amyloidosis is not obvious. In addition, it is uncertain whether the FDG uptake in any pathological type of amyloidosis can be confirmed. In localized AL amyloidosis, giant cells play a role in the production of amyloid, whereas giant cells are thought to be unnecessary for the formation and deposition of amyloid in systemic AL, amyloid A amyloidosis and transthyretin amyloidosis. The presence of giant cells and other inflammatory cells is thought to lead to increased FDG uptake [125, 126]; therefore, intense FDG uptake would be more likely in localized AL amyloidosis than in systematic amyloidosis [127] (Fig. 15).
Plasma cell malignancies such as multiple myeloma are characterized by clonal expansion of terminally differentiated B lymphoid cells, resulting in the production of monoclonal immunoglobulins or fragments [124]. FDG-PET/CT is a reliable method for the detection of active multiple myeloma, in which 12–15% of patients develop clinical amyloidosis during the course of the disease, and subclinical amyloid deposits are found in multiple organs, including the myocardium, in up to 30% of myeloma patients [128]. Amyloid cardiac involvement can cause life-threatening complications; therefore, recognition of AL amyloidosis in patients with multiple myeloma is crucial for therapeutic decision making.
Extra-myocardial finding
FDG uptake in the coronary arteries
In atherosclerotic lesions, arterial inflammation indicates high risk for the progression of such as calcium deposition, plaque rupture, and plaque vulnerability, leading to future cardiovascular disease [129, 130]. FDG activity within plaques correlates with inflammation in atherosclerosis, especially for increased macrophage infiltration [131]. The higher levels of FDG uptake in the carotid arteries and the aorta increase the risk of cardiovascular disease [132, 133]. FDG accumulation was increased in the ascending aorta and left main coronary artery of patients who presented with acute coronary syndrome [134].
In evaluation of FDG uptake in vulnerable plaque in the coronary arteries, patients follow a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet prior to FDG-PET with the aim of minimizing myocardial glucose uptake to better visualize coronary FDG uptake [134, 135]. In standard FDG-PET/CT examination, as suppressed myocardial FDG uptake is not always expected, this finding would be confirmed occasionally. Moreover, because of the limited spatial resolution of PET imaging, partial volume effect, and motion, it remains challenging to identify FDG uptake in the coronary arteries. Although the proximal coronary arteries can be assessed by PET imaging [134], the mid and distal coronary vasculature is obscured by physiological uptake in the myocardium, and half of all coronary territories cannot be interpreted despite optimal myocardial suppression protocols [136–138]. Accordingly, high FDG uptake in the proximal coronary arteries may indicate active plaque causing cardiovascular disease, and can be encountered in a standard FDG-PET/CT scan (Fig. 16).
Coronary vasculitis is uncommon but can cause severe and life-threatening complications such as coronary artery aneurysm, coronary artery stenosis, intraluminal thrombosis, and microcirculation abnormalities. Takayasu arteritis (TAK), giant cell arthritis (GCA), polyarteritis nodosa, ANCA vasculitis, Erdheim-Chester disease, Kawasaki disease, Bechet’s disease, immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) related periarteritis, are all associated with coronary vasculitis [139, 140]. The development of coronary artery stenosis in patients with TA is an extension of the inflammatory process and intimal proliferation in the ascending aorta. The incidence of coronary artery disease in TA has been reported as 10–45% in autopsy cases [141, 142]. FDG uptake in the coronary arteries was not confirmed in cases of TA accompanied by coronary ostial stenosis [143] (Fig. 16). Coronary artery involvement in IgG4 related disease can be confirmed as increased FDG uptake in the coronary arteries [144] (Fig. 16). This finding is caused by perivascular immuno-inflammation related to IgG4, which occurs in smaller vessels including the coronary arteries, as well as in large vessels [145, 146].
FDG uptake in the pericardium
The underlying causes of uptake in the pericardium are neoplastic disease, infectious disease, and noninfectious disease. Considering of physiological FDG uptake in the myocardium, pericardial FDG uptake can be recognized in the specific condition as suppressed myocardial FDG uptake, very high and/or mass-like FDG uptake in the pericardium, uptake around the atrium, where FDG uptake is generally low, and the presence of some extent of pericardial effusion, which appears as a space between the myocardium and pericardium. Therefore, if pericardial abnormality is suspected, it is recommended that the patient preparation is designed to suppress myocardial physiological FDG uptake, by such as prolonged fasting and following a high-fat/low-carbohydrate diet [147]. Fever, subacute course, large effusion or tamponade, and aspirin or NSAID failure are specific clinical features identifying high risk for specific causal conditions and complications [148].
The most common malignancy of the pericardium is metastatic pericardial tumor, of which the primary lesion is most commonly from the lung, breast, or lymphoma. It is important to consider a previous history of malignancy in diagnosis (Fig. 17).
Primary tumor in the pericardium is rare, but includes mesothelioma, sarcoma, and lymphoma, which can be identified by FDG avidity in the pericardium [147]. The common feature of malignant disease of the pericardium is accompanying pericardial effusion, but this feature is also associated with generalized conditions such as hypoalbuminemia and anemia that occur in various types of progressive disease, including malignancy [149].
In patients who have no previous history of malignancy, acute pericarditis is caused by cancer pathogenesis in up to 5% of cases [148]. The incidence of malignancy increases to 23% when the pericarditis is accompanied by pericardial effusion [150, 151]. FDG-PET/CT can detect the primary lesion and tumor extension, and the identification of a pericardial lesion may result in changes to the more effective treatment plan.
Viral pericarditis is the most common and least severe type of acute pericarditis. It is usually self-limiting and rarely progresses to cardiac tamponade [148]. Clinically, viral pericarditis mimics idiopathic pericarditis in its manifestation. Although a mild disease in most cases, when combined with myocarditis there is a high risk of heart failure and the prognosis is poor [150]. Bacterial and fungal pericarditis is more common in immunocompromised patients and accompanied the infection in adjacent organs. A sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT is lower than echocardiography and CT for the diagnosis of pericarditis.
Tuberculous pericarditis has high morbidity and mortality and frequently results in constrictive pericarditis [152]. In addition to its value in evaluating pericarditis, FDG-PET/CT is useful for detecting extrapulmonary tuberculosis [153] (Fig. 17). The pericardial FDG uptake was characteristically diffuse or multifocal in acute tuberculous pericarditis and diffuse or regional in acute idiopathic pericarditis. The degree of FDG uptake in the pericardium and the mediastinal and supraclavicular lymph nodes is higher in acute tuberculous pericarditis than in idiopathic pericarditis [154].
The utility of SUV values for distinguishing between benign and malignant pericardial disease remains controversial, as the values vary broadly in both settings [155]. Zhang et al. reported that mean SUVmax was 1.75 (range 1.0–9.2) in a tumor group, which was significantly higher than that in a nontumor group (mean SUVmax, 1.1; range 0.7–2.2), but the differences were so small with a certain level of overlap.
Radiation-associated pericarditis can develop during or immediately after radiation therapy, but most typically presents around 1 year after the end of radiation treatment. Pericarditis is usually accompanied by asymptomatic pericardial effusion, with subsequent fibrosis in some patients [156]. The lower threshold of the radiation dose leading to radiation-associated heart disease is ~ 15 Gy, and cardiac complications increase at doses > 40 Gy [157]. Patients with radiation-induced pericarditis typically present with FDG uptake consistent with the radiation field; therefore, information in the radiation dose report can help distinguish between radiation-induced pericarditis and other pericardial disease [18].
Epipericardial fat necrosis is a benign condition that commonly presents as acute pleuritic chest pain [158]. CT may show focal increased attenuation within the epipericardial fat [159], and it demonstrates low FDG uptake (Fig. 18).
Possibility of systemic inflammatory disease
In systemic inflammatory disease, pericarditis can occur [160] in granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) [161], eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) [162], systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [163], systemic sclerosis, mixed connective tissue disease, adult-onset still disease (AOSD) [164], and relapsing polychondritis (Fig. 19). GPA, EGPA, SLE (rare), and relapsing polychondritis can accompany cardiac artery disease; myocarditis may occur in EGPA, SLE, and AOSD; endocarditis can occur in GPA and SLE (Libman-Sacks endocarditis) [165]; cardiomyopathy in SLE; and valvular disease in SLE and relapsing polychondritis. Although the features of FDG uptake in the myocardium and pericardium have been reported for some types of systematic disease, it remains challenging to identify these systematic diseases by FDG-PET/CT imaging alone.
CT portion of PET/CT
The CT portion of PET/CT can provide valuable information for identification of myocardial disease and/or other related disease. Lee et al. demonstrated incidental cardiac and pericardial abnormalities on chest CT, but it could be identified under the contrast media to be able to identify the hidden disease clearly [166]. The CT scanning during PET/CT examination is obtained with low dose radiation, without electrocardiogram gating and contrast media; thus identification of myocardial and pericardial abnormalities would be limited.
As the presence of coronary calcification is a risk factor for acute coronary events, its presence on CT scanning during PET/CT can identify individuals at risk for acute coronary events [167, 168]. Moreover, low-attenuation noncalcified plaque, positive remodeling, and small spottily distributed calcifications were reported to be associated with an increased likelihood of adverse events [169]. Intense FDG uptake in the coronary arteries indicates vascular inflammation and is associated with the progression of coronary artery calcification. However, sites of calcification on CT consistently demonstrate no or very minimal uptake of FDG, suggesting that inflammation is not a major component in the formation of atherosclerotic plaques [170–174]. A mild degree of calcification on CT is characteristic of acute coronary events, whereas diffused high-attenuation calcific plaques are related to chronic coronary events [175].
A curvilinear dark line in the myocardium indicating fibrosis or fatty metaplasia is seen in 22–62% of patients with a history of myocardial infarction [176] (Fig. 20). This finding is confirmed also in LV aneurysms that developed from myocardial infarction [177]. Other entities that show abnormal myocardial fat include arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy or dysplasia (ARVC), cardiac lipoma, LHIAS, tuberous sclerosis, complex tuberculosis, dilated cardiomyopathy, and muscular dystrophy [176].
Myocardial calcification is a reliable sign of previous myocardial infarction. Septal involvement and regional myocardial thinning help to differentiate these lesions from those of calcific pericarditis [166].
The possibility of congenial heart disease and heart failure can be implied by irregularly shaped myocardium (Fig. 20). Aortic stenosis may be suspected by aortic valve calcification with LV and aortic dilatation or LV hypertrophy supported by FDG uptake features. Mitral annulus calcification is a degenerative process of the fibrous support structure of the mitral valve. It may not affect the function of mitral valve, but it is an additional marker of atherosclerosis [178].
Visualization of the interventricular septum suggests abnormally low hemoglobin concentration, in patients with glycogen and iron storage diseases and also in patients with iron overload caused by multiple blood transfusions in the presence of normal hemoglobin levels [179] (Fig. 20). On thoracic CT, a CT density threshold of 35 HU has been used to differentiate between anemic and nonanemic states [180, 181].
Conclusion
Due to the variety of physiological FDG uptake in the myocardium, the interpretation of cardiac FDG uptake in standard FDG-PET/CT is usually uncertain. However, recognition of possible underlying disease based on knowledge of common patterns of myocardial FDG uptake will support further patient management to avoid complications due to the disease.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declare that I have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical statement
This article contains a case undergone with a clinical study of which procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The others does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the author.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from a case undergone with a clinical study.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Naveri L, Naveri H, Harkonen M. Myocardial energy metabolism. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1987;76:3–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shao D, Tian R. Glucose transporters in cardiac metabolism and hypertrophy. Compr Physiol. 2015;6:331–351. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c150016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gropler RJ, Siegel BA, Lee KJ, Moerlein SM, Perry DJ, Bergmann SR, et al. Nonuniformity in myocardial accumulation of fluorine-18-fulorodeoxyglucose in normal fasted humans. J Nucl Med. 1990;31:1749–1756. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dilsizian V, Pohost GM. Cardiac CT, PET&MR(third edition). 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.p175–202.
- 5.Peterson LR, Soto PF, Herrero P, Schechtman KB, Dence C, Gropler RJ. Sex differences in myocardial oxygen and glucose metabolism. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:573–581. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Weiner CP, Lizasoain I, Baylis SA, Knowles RG, Charles IG, Moncada S. Induction of calcium-dependent nitric oxide synthases by sex hormones. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:5212–5216. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.5212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mensink RP, Zock PL, Kester AD, Katan MB. Effects of dietary fatty acids and carbohydrates on the ratio of serum total to HDL cholesterol and on serum lipids and apolipoproteins: a meta-analysis of 60 controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:1146–1155. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/77.5.1146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Abu-Erreish GM, Neely JR, Whitmer JT, Whitman V, Sanadi DR. Fatty acid oxidation by isolated perfused working hearts of aged rats. Am J Physiol. 1977;232:E258–E262. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1977.232.3.E258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.McMillin JB, Taffet GE, Taegtmeyer H, Hudson EK, Tate CA. Mitochondrial metabolism and substrate competition in the aging Fischer rat heart. Cardiovasc Res. 1993;27:2222–2228. doi: 10.1093/cvr/27.12.2222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Iemitsu M, Miyauchi T, Maeda S, Tanabe T, Takanashi M, Irukayama-Tomobe Y, et al. Aging-induced decrease in the PPAR-alpha level in hearts is improved by exercise training. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002;283:H1750–H1760. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01051.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Paradies G, Ruggiero FM, Petrosillo G, Gadaleta MN, Quagliariello E. The effect of aging and acetyl-l-carnitine on the function and on the lipid composition of rat heart mitochondria. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994;717:233–243. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb12093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kates AM, Herrero P, Dence C, Soto P, Srinivasan M, Delano DG, et al. Impact of aging on substrate metabolism by the human heart. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:293–299. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02714-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Peterson LR, Soto PF, Herrero P, Mohammed BS, Avidan MS, Schechtman KB, et al. Impact of gender on the myocardial metabolic response to obesity. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:424–433. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Boudina S, Abel ED. Diabetic cardiomyopathy revisited. Circulation. 2007;115:3213–3223. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.679597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.de Groot M, Meeuwis AP, Kok PJ, Corstens FH, Oyen WJ. Influence of blood glucose level, age and fasting period on non-pathological FDG uptake in heart and gut. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:98–101. doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1670-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Minamimoto R, Takahashi N, Inoue T. FDG-PET of patients with suspected renal failure: standardized uptake values in normal tissues. Ann Nucl Med. 2007;21:217–222. doi: 10.1007/s12149-007-0012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Choi Y, Brunken RC, Hawkins RA, Huang SC, Buxton DB, Hoh CK, et al. Factors affecting myocardial 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose uptake in positron emission tomography studies of normal humans. Eur J Nucl Med. 1993;20:308–318. doi: 10.1007/BF00169806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Maurer AH, Burshteyn M, Adler LP, Steiner RM. How to differentiate benign versus malignant cardiac and paracardiac 18F FDG uptake at oncologic PET/CT. Radiographics. 2011;31:1287–1305. doi: 10.1148/rg.315115003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Israel O, Weiler-Sagie M, Rispler S, Bar-Shalom R, Frenkel A, Keidar Z, et al. PET/CT quantitation of the effect of patient-related factors on cardiac 18F-FDG uptake. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:234–239. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Staels B, Dallongeville J, Auwerx J, Schoonjans K, Leitersdorf E, Fruchart JC. Mechanism of action of fibrates on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Circulation. 1998;98:2088–2093. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.19.2088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tenenbaum A, Fisman EZ. Balanced pan-PPAR activator bezafibrate in combination with statin: comprehensive lipids control and diabetes prevention? Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012;11:140. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Castello A, Rodriguez-Manzaneque JC, Camps M, Pérez-Castillo A, Testar X, Palacín M, et al. Perinatal hypothyroidism impairs the normal transition of GLUT4 and GLUT1 glucose transporters from fetal to neonatal levels in heart and brown adipose tissue: evidence for tissue-specific regulation of GLUT4 expression by thyroid hormone. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:5905–5912. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gualberto A, Molinero P, Sobrino F. The effect of experimental hypothyroidism on phosphofructokinase activity and fructose 2,6-bisphosphate concentrations in rat heart. Biochem J. 1987;244:137–142. doi: 10.1042/bj2440137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Segal J. Acute effect of thyroid hormone on the heart: an extranuclear increase in sugar uptake. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1989;21:323–334. doi: 10.1016/0022-2828(89)90748-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hällsten K, Virtanen KA, Lönnqvist F, Janatuinen T, Turiceanu M, Rönnemaa T, et al. Enhancement of insulin-stimulated myocardial glucose uptake in patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with rosiglitazone. Diabet Med. 2004;21:1280–1287. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01332.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lautamäki R, Airaksinen KE, Seppänen M, Toikka J, Luotolahti M, Ball E, et al. Rosiglitazone improves myocardial glucose uptake in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease: a 16-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Diabetes. 2005;54:2787–2794. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.9.2787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zeegers A, van Wilgenburg H, Leeuwin RS. Cardiac effects of benzodiazepine receptor agonists and antagonists in the isolated rat heart: a comparative study. Life Sci. 1998;63:1439–1456. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(98)00411-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fukuchi K, Ohta H, Matsumura K, Ishida Y. Benign variations and incidental abnormalities of myocardial FDG uptake in the fasting state as encountered during routine oncology positron emission tomography studies. Br J Radiol. 2007;80:3–11. doi: 10.1259/bjr/92105597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Inglese E, Leva L, Matheoud R, Sacchetti G, Secco C, Gandolfo P, et al. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of regional myocardial uptake in patients without heart disease under fasting conditions on repeated whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1662–1669. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.041574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tamaki N, Yonekura Y, Kawamoto M, Magata Y, Sasayama S, Takahashi N, et al. Simple quantification of regional myocardial uptake of fluorine-18-deoxyglucose in the fasting condition. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:2152–2157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Feygin J, Hu Q, Swingen C, Zhang J. Relationships between regional myocardial wall stress and bioenergetics in hearts with left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008;294:H2313–H2321. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01288.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Betancourt Cuellar SL, Palacio D, Benveniste MF, Carter BW, Gladish G. Pitfalls and misinterpretations of cardiac findings on PET/CT imaging: a careful look at the heart in oncology patients. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2019;48:172–183. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Maurer AH, Burshteyn M, Adler LP, Gaughan JP, Steiner RM. Variable cardiac 18FDG patterns seen in oncologic positron emission tomography computed tomography: importance for differentiating normal physiology from cardiac and paracardiac disease. J Thorac Imaging. 2012;27:263–268. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e3182176675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nose H, Otsuka H, Otomi Y, Erazawa K, Takao S, Iwamoto S, et al. The physiological uptake pattern of 18F-FDG in the left ventricular myocardium of patients without heart disease. J Med Invest. 2014;61:53–58. doi: 10.2152/jmi.61.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pharr JR, West MB, Kusumoto FM, Figueredo VM. Prominent crista terminalis appearing as a right atrial mass on transthoracic echocardiogram. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15:753–755. doi: 10.1067/mje.2002.119163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Salustri A, Bakir S, Sana A, Lange P, Al Mahmeed WA. Prominent crista terminal is mimicking aright atrial mass: case report. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2010;8:47. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-8-47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Loukas M, Tubbs RS, Tongson JM, Polepalli S, Curry B, Jordan R, et al. The clinical anatomy of the crista terminalis, pectinate muscles and the teniae sagittalis. Ann Anat. 2008;190:81–87. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2007.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Akcay M, Bilen ES, Bilge M, Durmaz T, Kurt M. Prominent crista terminalis: as an anatomic structure leading to atrial arrhythmias and mimicking right atrial mass. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20:197.e9–197.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.08.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.D’Amato N, Pierfelice O, D’Agostino C. Crista terminalis bridge: a rare variant mimicking right atrial mass. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10:444–445. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jen316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gay JD, Guileyardo JM, Townsend-Parchman JK, Ross K. Clinical and morphologic features of lipomatous hypertrophy (“massive fatty deposits”) of the interatrial septum. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1996;17:43–48. doi: 10.1097/00000433-199603000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shirani J, Roberts WC. Clinical, electrocardiographic and morphologic features of massive fatty deposits(lipomatous hypertrophy)in the atrial septum. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:226–238. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90839-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pérez Arroyuelos I, Berástegui Imaz M, Canteli Padilla B, Urresola OA. Lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum associated with fatty replacement of the ventricular myocardium: a case report. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:152–154. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Page DL. Lipomatous hypertrophy of the cardiac interatrial septum: its development and probable clinical significance. HumPathol. 1970;1:151–163. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(70)80008-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fan CM, Fischman AJ, Kwek BH, Abbara S, Aquino SL. Lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum: increased uptake on FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:339–342. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Himms-Hagen J. Brown adipose tissue metabolism and thermogenesis. Annu Rev Nutr. 1985;5:69–94. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nu.05.070185.000441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cohade C, Osman M, Pannu HK, Wahl RL. Uptake in supraclavicular area fat (‘‘USA-Fat’’): description on 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:170–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Reyes CV, Jablokow VR. Lipomatous hypertrophy of the cardiac interatrial septum. A report of 38 cases and review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol. 1979;72:785–788. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/72.5.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Moinuddeen K, Marica S, Clausi RL, Zama N. Lipomatous interatrial septal hypertrophy: an unusual cause of intracardiac mass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;22:468–469. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00369-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Truong MT, Erasmus JJ, Munden RF, Marom EM, Sabloff BS, Gladish GW, et al. Focal FDG uptake in mediastinal brownfat mimicking malignancy: a potential pitfall resolved on PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1127–1132. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.4.1831127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Xie B, Chen BX, Wu JY, Liu X, Yang MF. Factors relevant to atrial 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in atrial fibrillation. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018 doi: 10.1007/s12350-018-1387-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Fujii H, Ide M, Yasuda S, Takahashi W, Shohtsu A, Kubo A. Increased FDG uptake in the wall of the right atrium in people who participated in a cancer screening program with whole-body PET. Ann Nucl Med. 1999;13:55–59. doi: 10.1007/BF03165430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Joseph P, Ishai A, MacNabb M, Abdelbaky A, Lavender ZR, Ruskin J, et al. Atrial fibrillation is associated with hematopoietic tissue activation and arterial inflammation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;32:113–119. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0766-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Watanabe E, Miyagawa M, Uetani T, Kinoshita M, Kitazawa R, Kurata M, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography detection of increased 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the cardiac atria of patients with atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2019;283:171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.10.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sinigaglia M, Mahida B, Piekarski E, Chequer R, Mikail N, Benali K, et al. FDG atrial uptake is associated with an increased prevalence of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:1268–1275. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-4274-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Taylor M, Wallhaus TR, Degrado TR, Russell DC, Stanko P, Nickles RJ, et al. An evaluation of myocardial fatty acid and glucose uptake using PET with [18F]fluoro-6-thia-heptadecanoic acid and [18F]FDG in patients with congestive heart failure. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:55–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Jameel MN, Zhang J. Myocardial energetics in left ventricular hypertrophy. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2009;5:243–250. doi: 10.2174/157340309788970379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Oikawa M, Kagaya Y, Otani H, Sakuma M, Demachi J, Suzuki J, et al. Increased [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation in right ventricular free wall in patients with pulmonary hypertension and the effect of epoprostenol. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1849–1855. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yang T, Wang L, Xiong CM, He JG, Zhang Y, Gu Q, et al. The ratio of (18) F-FDG activity uptake between the right and left ventricle in patients with pulmonary hypertension correlates with the right ventricular function. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;39:426–430. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tatebe S, Fukumoto Y, Oikawa-Wakayama M, Sugimura K, Satoh K, Miura Y, et al. Enhanced [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation in the right ventricular free wall predicts long-term prognosis of patients with pulmonary hypertension: a preliminary observational study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;15:666–672. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jet276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Uehara T, Ishida Y, Hayashida K, Shimonagata T, Miyake Y, Sago M, et al. Myocardial glucose metabolism in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: assessment by F-18-FDG PET study. Ann Nucl Med. 1998;12:95–103. doi: 10.1007/BF03164836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kolwicz SC, Jr, Tian R. Glucose metabolism and cardiac hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;90:194–201. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvr071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hamirani YS, Kundu BK, Zhong M, McBride A, Li Y, Davogustto GE, et al. Noninvasive detection of early metabolic left ventricular remodeling in systemic hypertension. Cardiology. 2016;133:157–162. doi: 10.1159/000441276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lundgrin EL, Park MM, Sharp J, Tang WH, Thomas JD, Asosingh K, et al. Fasting 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography to detect metabolic changes in pulmonary arterial hypertension hearts over 1 year. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013;10:1–9. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201206-029OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Minamimoto R, Morooka M, Miyata Y, Ito K, Okasaki M, Hara H, et al. Incidental focal FDG uptake in heart is a lighthouse for considering cardiac screening. Ann Nucl Med. 2013;27:572–580. doi: 10.1007/s12149-013-0721-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Katagiri M, Nakahara T, Murata M, Ogata Y, Matsusaka Y, Iwabuchi Y, et al. Incidental spade-shaped FDG uptake in the left ventricular apex suggests apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Ann Nucl Med. 2017;31:399–406. doi: 10.1007/s12149-017-1167-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Takanami K, Saito M, Matsumoto Y, Sugimura K, Takase K. Clinical implication of myocardial FDG uptake pattern in oncologic PET: retrospective comparison study with stress myocardial perfusion imaging as the reference standard. Ann Nucl Med. 2020;34:233–243. doi: 10.1007/s12149-020-01437-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Haider A, Bengs S, Schade K, Wijnen WJ, Portmann A, Etter D, et al. Myocardial 18F-FDG uptake pattern for cardiovascular risk stratification in patients undergoing oncologic PET/CT. J Clin Med. 2020;9:2279. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Abbott BG, Liu YH, Arrighi JA. [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose as a memory marker of transient myocardial ischaemia. Nucl Med Commun. 2007;28:89–94. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328013eaa5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Lyall A, Capobianco J, Strauss HW, Gonen M, Schoder H. Treadmill exercise inducing mild to moderate ischemia has no significant effect on skeletal muscle or cardiac 18F-FDG uptake and image quality on subsequent whole-body PET scan. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:917–921. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.101394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Dou KF, Xie BQ, Gao XJ, Li Y, Yang YJ, He ZX, et al. Use of resting myocardial 18F-FDG imaging in the detection of unstable angina. Nucl Med Commun. 2015;36:999–1006. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Aikawa T, Naya M, Manabe O, Obara M, Matsushima S, Tamaki N, et al. Incidental focal myocardial 18F-FDG uptake indicating asymptomatic coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23:596–598. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0258-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Vilain D, Bochet J, Le Stanc E, Wattel C, Hameg A, Tainturier C. Unsuspected hibernating myocardium detected by routine oncology (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:409. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1323-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Bengel FM, Higuchi T, Javadi MS, Lautamäki R, et al. Cardiac positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Thompson K, Saab G, Birnie D, Chow BJ, Ukkonen H, Ananthasubramaniam K, et al. Is septal glucose metabolism altered in patients with left bundle branch block and ischemic cardiomyopathy? J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1763–1768. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Yoshida T, Hibino T, Kako N, Murai S, Oguri M, Kato K, et al. A pathophysiologic study of Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2598–2604. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Wittstein IS. Stress cardiomyopathy: a syndrome of catecholamine-mediated myocardial stunning. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2012;32:847–857. doi: 10.1007/s10571-012-9804-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Bossone E, Lyon A, Citro R, Athanasiadis A, Meimoun P, Parodi G, et al. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: an integrated multi-imaging approach. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;15:366–377. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jet167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Garcha AS, Cohen DL. Catecholamine excess: pseudopheochromocytoma and beyond. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2015;22:218–223. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2014.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Gorla AK, Sood A, Prakash G, Parmar M, Mittal BR. Substantial increase in myocardial FDG uptake on interim PET/CT may be an early sign of adriamycin-induced cardiotoxicity. Clin Nucl Med. 2016;41:462–463. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Borde C, Kand P, Basu S. Enhanced myocardial fluorodeoxyglucose uptake following adriamycinbased therapy: evidence of early chemotherapeutic cardiotoxicity? World J Radiol. 2012;4:220–223. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i5.220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Bauckneht M, Ferrarazzo G, Fiz F, Morbelli S, Sarocchi M, Pastorino F, et al. Doxorubicin effect on myocardial metabolism as a prerequisite for subsequent development of cardiac toxicity: a translational (18)F-FDG PET/CT observation. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1638–1645. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.191122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Kim J, Cho SG, Kang SR, Yoo SW, Kwon SY, Min JJ, et al. Association between FDG uptake in the right ventricular myocardium and cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 83.Sarocchi M, Bauckneht M, Arboscello E, Capitanio S, Marini C, Morbelli S, et al. An increase in myocardial 18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake is associated with left ventricular ejection fraction decline in Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with anthracycline. J Transl Med. 2018;16:295. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1670-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Toubert ME, Vercellino L, Faugeron I, Lussato D, Hindie E, Bousquet G. Fatal heart failure after a 26-month combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in a papillary thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2011;21:451–454. doi: 10.1089/thy.2010.0270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Keramida K, Farmakis D, Bingcang J, Sulemane S, Sutherland S, Bingcang RA, et al. Longitudinal changes of right ventricular deformation mechanics during trastuzumab therapy in breast cancer patients. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21:529–535. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Carvalho RA, Sousa RP, Cadete VJ, Lopaschuk GD, Palmeira CM, Bjork JA, et al. Metabolic remodeling associated with subchronic doxorubicin cardiomyopathy. Toxicology. 2010;270:92–98. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2010.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Hrelia S, Fiorentini D, Maraldi T, Angeloni C, Bordoni A, Biagi PL, et al. Doxorubicin induces early lipid peroxidation associated with changes in glucose transport in cultured cardiomyocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1567:150–156. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(02)00612-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Zöphel K, Hölzel C, Dawel M, Hölscher T, Evers C, Kotzerke J. PET/CT demonstrates increased myocardial FDG uptake following irradiation therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:1322–1323. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0469-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Jingu K, Kaneta T, Nemoto K, Ichinose A, Oikawa M, Takai Y, et al. The utility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for early diagnosis of radiation-induced myocardial damage. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:845–851. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Konski A, Li T, Christensen M, Cheng JD, Yu JQ, Crawford K, et al. Symptomatic cardiac toxicity is predicted by dosimetric and patient factors rather than changes in 18F-FDG PET determination of myocardial activity after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2012;104:72–77. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Evans JD, Gomez DR, Chang JY, Gladish GW, Erasmus JJ, Rebueno N, et al. Cardiac 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography after thoracic stereotactic body radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2013;109:82–88. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Unal K, Unlu M, Akdemir O, Akmansu M. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings of radiotherapy-related myocardial changes in patients with thoracic malignancies. Nucl Med Commun. 2013;34:855–859. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328362f824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Yan R, Song J, Wu Z, Guo M, Liu J, Li J, et al. Detection of myocardial metabolic abnormalities by 18F-FDG PET/CT and corresponding pathological changes in beagles with local heart irradiation. Korean J Radiol. 2015;16:919–928. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.4.919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Yan J, Zhang C, Niu Y, Yuan R, Zeng X, Ge X, et al. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in infectious endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;54:337–342. doi: 10.5414/CP202569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, Bongiorni MG, Casalta JP, Del Zotti F, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The task force for the management of infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) Eur Heart J. 2015;36:3075–3128. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Saby L, Laas O, Habib G, Cammilleri S, Mancini J, Tessonnier L, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography for diagnosis of prosthetic valve endocarditis: increased valvular 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake as a novel major criterion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:2374–2382. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Van Riet J, Hill EE, Gheysens O, Dymarkowski S, HerregodsM-C, Herijgers P, et al. 18 F-FDG PET/CT for early detection of embolism and metastatic infection in patients with infective endocarditis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1189–97. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 98.Erba PA, Lancellotti P, Vilacosta I, Gaemperli O, Rouzet F, Hacker M, et al. Recommendations on nuclear and multimodality imaging in IE and CIED infections. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1795–1815. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4025-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Chareonthaitawee P, Beanlands RS, Chen W, Dorbala S, Miller EJ, Murthy VL, et al. Joint SNMMI-ASNC expert consensus document on the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in cardiac sarcoid detection and therapy monitoring. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1341–1353. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.196287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Cooper LT, Baughman KL, Feldman AM, Frustaci A, Jessup M, Kuhl U, et al. The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease. JACC. 2007;50:1914–1931. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Okada DR, Bravo PE, Vita T, Agarwal V, Osborne MT, Taqueti VR, et al. Isolated cardiac sarcoidosis: a focused review of an under-recognized entity. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018;25:1136–1146. doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0658-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Giudicatti L, Marangou J, Nolan D, Dembo L, Baumwol J, Dwivedi G. The utility of whole body 18F-FDG PET-CT in diagnosing isolated cardiac sarcoidosis: the Western Australian Cardiac Sarcoid Study. Heart Lung Circ. 2020;29:e1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Butany J, Nair V, Naseemuddin A, Nair GM, Catton C, Yau T. Cardiac tumours: diagnosis and management. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:219–228. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70093-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Makis W, Ciarallo A, Hickeson M, Rush C, Novales-Diaz JA, Derbekyan V, et al. Spectrum of malignant pleural andpericardial disease on FDG PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:678–685. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Lam KY, Dickens P, Chan ACL. Tumors of the heart: a 20-year experience with a review of 12485 consecutive autopsies. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1993;117:1027–1031. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Butany J, Leong SW, Carmichael K, Komeda M. A 30-year analysis of cardiac neoplasms at autopsy. Can J Cardiol. 2005;21:675–680. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Tyebally S, Chen D, Bhattacharyya S, Mughrabi A, Hussain Z, Manisty C, et al. Cardiac tumors: JACC cardio oncology state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol CardioOnc. 2020;2:293–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Saponara M, Ambrosini V, Nannini M, Gatto L, Astolfi A, Urbini M, et al. 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging in cardiac tumors: illustrative clinical cases and review of the literature. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2018;30(10):1758835918793569. doi: 10.1177/1758835918793569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Cresti A, Chiavarelli M, Glauber M, Tanganelli P, Scalese M, Cesareo F, et al. Incidence rate of primary cardiac tumors: a 14-year population study. J Cardiovasc Med. 2016;17:37–43. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Burke A, Tavora F. The 2015 WHO classification of tumors of the heart and pericardium. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:441–452. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2015.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Agostini D, Babatasi G, Galateau F, Grollier G, Potier JC, Bouvard G. Detection of cardiac myxoma by F-18 FDG PET. Clin Nucl Med. 1999;24:159–160. doi: 10.1097/00003072-199903000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Zingas AP, Carrera JD, Murray CA, 3rd, Kling GA. Lipoma of the myocardium. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1983;7:1098–1100. doi: 10.1097/00004728-198312000-00034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Rahbar K, Seifarth H, Schäfers M, Stegger L, Hoffmeier A, Spieker T, et al. Differentiation of malignant and benign cardiac tumors using 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:856–863. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.095364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.D'Angelo EC, Paolisso P, Vitale G, Foà A, Bergamaschi L, Magnani I, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography and 18-F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in cardiac masses. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:2400–2411. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Hori Y, Funabashi N, Miyauchi H, Nakagawa K, Shimura H, Miyazaki M, et al. Angiosarcoma in the right atria demonstrated by fusion images of multislice computed tomography and positron emission tomography using F-18 fluoro-deoxyglucose. Int J Cardiol. 2007;123:e15–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.11.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Zhang M, Li B, Jiang X. PET/CT imaging in a case of cardiac liposarcoma. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15:473–475. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2008.02.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Niu N, Cui R, Li F. FDG PET/CT findings of intracardiac myeloid sarcoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2016;41:235–236. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Wang Q, Lin SH, Dai D, Xu WG, Li YJ. Primary pericardial osteosarcoma on FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:e326–e328. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182708368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Gowda RM, Khan IA. Clinical perspectives of primary cardiac lymphoma. Angiology. 2003;54:599–604. doi: 10.1177/000331970305400510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Minamimoto R, Morooka M, Kubota K, Ito K, Masuda-Miyata Y, Mitsumoto T, et al. Value of FDG-PET/CT using unfractionated heparin for managing primary cardiac lymphoma and several key findings. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18:516–520. doi: 10.1007/s12350-011-9358-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Kikuchi Y, Oyama-Manabe N, Manabe O, Naya M, Ito YM, Hatanaka KC, et al. Imaging characteristics of cardiac dominant diffuse large B-cell lymphoma demonstrated with MDCT and PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:1337–1344. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2436-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Stolzel F, Rollig C, Radke J, Mohr B, Platzbecker U, Bornhäuser M, et al. 18F-FDG-PET/CT for detection of extramedullary acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2011;96:1552–1556. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.045047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Gazzilli M, Bertoli M, Albano D, Durmo R, Cerudelli E, Bertagna F, et al. Cardiac amyloidosis incidentally detected by 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 124.Lee JH, Lee GY, Kim SJ, Kim KH, Jeon ES, Lee KH, et al. Imaging findings and literature review of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in primary systemic AL amyloidosis. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;49:182–190. doi: 10.1007/s13139-015-0338-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Westermark P. Localized AL amyloidosis: a suicidal neoplasm? Ups J Med Sci. 2012;117:244–250. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2012.654861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Glaudemans AW, Slart RH, Noordzij W, Dierckx RA, Hazenberg BP. Utility of 18F-FDG PET(/CT) in patients with systemic and localized amyloidosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:1095–1101. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2375-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Bahlis NJ, Lazarus HM. Multiple myeloma-associated AL amyloidosis: is a distinctive therapeutic approach warranted? Bone Marrow Transpl. 2006;38:7–15. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Rajkumar SV, Gertz MA, Kyle RA. Primary systemic amyloidosis with delayed progression to multiple myeloma. Cancer. 1998;82:1501–1505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Joseph P, Tawakol A. Imaging atherosclerosis with positron emission tomography. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2974–2980. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Sun ZH, Rashmizal H, Xu L. Molecular imaging of plaques in coronary arteries with PET and SPECT. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2014;11:259–273. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2014.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Moreno PR, Falk E, Palacios IF, Newell JB, Fuster V, Fallon JT. Macrophage infiltration in acute coronary syndromes. Implications for plaque rupture. Circulation. 1994;90:775–778. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.2.775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Rudd JH, Warburton EA, Fryer TD, Jones HA, Clark JC, Antoun N, et al. Imaging atherosclerotic plaque inflammation with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Circulation. 2002;105:2708–2711. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000020548.60110.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Bucerius J, Duivenvoorden R, Mani V, Moncrieff C, Rudd JH, Calcagno C, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of carotid vessel wall inflammation in coronary artery disease patients. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Imag. 2011;4:1196–1205. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Rogers IS, Nasir K, Figueroa AL, Cury RC, Hoffmann U, Vermylen DA, et al. Feasibility of FDG imaging of the coronary arteries: comparison between acute coronary syndrome and stable angina. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:388–397. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Wykrzykowska J, Lehman S, Williams G, Parker JA, Palmer MR, Varkey S, et al. Imaging of inflamed and vulnerable plaque in coronary arteries with 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with suppression of myocardial uptake using a low-carbohydrate, high-fat preparation. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:563–568. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.055616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Joshi NV, Vesey AT, Williams MC, Shah AS, Calvert PA, Craighead FH, et al. 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography for identification of ruptured and high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a prospective clinical trial. Lancet. 2014;22(383):705–713. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61754-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Dweck MR, Chow MW, Joshi NV, Williams MC, Jones C, Fletcher AM, et al. Coronary arterial 18F-sodium fluoride uptake: a novel marker of plaque biology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1539–1548. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Moss AJ, Adamson PD, Newby DE, Dweck MR. Positron emission tomography imaging of coronary atherosclerosis. Future Cardiol. 2016;12:483–496. doi: 10.2217/fca-2016-0017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Jeon CH, Kim YK, Chun EJ, Kim JA, Yong HS, Doo KW, et al. Coronary artery vasculitis: assessment with cardiac multi-detector computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;31(Suppl 1):59–67. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0652-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Koster MJ, Warrington KJ. Vasculitis of the Coronary Arteries. American College of Cardiology. https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2019/03/13/06/50/vasculitis-of-the-coronary-arteries
- 141.Amano J, Suzuki A. Coronary artery involvement in Takayasu's arteritis. Collective review and guideline for surgical treatment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;102:554–560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Nagata S. Present state of autopsy cases of Takayasu’s arteritis (aortitis syndrome) in Japan. J Jpn Coll Angiol. 1990;30:1303–1308. [Google Scholar]
- 143.Yokokawa T, Kunii H, Kaneshiro T, Ichimura S, Yoshihisa A, Yashiro Furuya M, et al. Regressed coronary ostial stenosis in a young female with Takayasu arteritis: a case report. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019;19:79. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1066-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Huang HL, Fong W, Peh WM, Niraj KA, Lam WW. The utility of FDG PET/CT in IgG4-related disease with a focus on coronary artery involvement. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;52:53–61. doi: 10.1007/s13139-017-0494-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Matsumoto Y, Kasashima S, Kawashima A, Sasaki H, Endo M, Kawakami K, et al. A case of multiple immunoglobulin G4-related periarteritis: a tumorous lesion of the coronary artery and abdominal aortic aneurysm. Hum Pathol. 2008;39:975–980. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Maturen KE, Sundaram B, Marder W, Swartz RD. Coronary artery involvement in idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: computed tomographic findings. J Thorac Imaging. 2012;27:W35–37. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e318213bcad. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Lobert P, Brown RK, Dvorak RA, Corbett JR, Kazerooni EA, Wong KK. Spectrum of physiological and pathological cardiac and pericardial uptake of FDG in oncology PET-CT. Clin Radiol. 2013;68:e5971. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Imazio M, Cecchi E, Demichelis B, Ierna S, Demarie D, Ghisio A, et al. Indicators of poor prognosis of acute pericarditis. Circulation. 2007;115:2739–2744. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.662114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Kim MS, Kim EK, Choi JY, Oh JK, Chang SA. Clinical utility of [18F]FDG-PET /CT in pericardial disease. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019;21:107. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1193-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Imazio M, Spodick DH, Brucato A, Trinchero R, Adler Y. Controversial issues in the management of pericardial diseases. Circulation. 2010;121:916–928. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.844753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Sagristà-Sauleda J, Mercé J, Permanyer-Miralda G, Soler-Soler J. Clinical clues to the causes of large pericardial effusions. Am J Med. 2000;109:95–101. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00459-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Sagrista-Sauleda J, Permanyer-Miralda G, Soler-Soler J. Tuberculous pericarditis: ten year experience with a prospective protocol for diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:724–728. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90203-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Sathekge MM, Maes A, Pottel H, Stoltz A, van de Wiele C. Dual time-point FDG PET-CT for differentiating benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules in a TB endemic area. S Afr Med J. 2010;100:598–601. doi: 10.7196/samj.4082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Dong A, Dong H, Wang Y, Cheng C, Zuo C, Lu J. (18)F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating acute tuberculous from idiopathic pericarditis: preliminary study. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:e160-5. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31827a2537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Shao D, Wang SX, Liang CH, Gao Q. Differentiation of malignant from benign heart and pericardial lesions using positron emission tomography and computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18:668–677. doi: 10.1007/s12350-011-9398-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Stewart JR, Fajardo LF. Radiation-induced heart disease: an update. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1984;27:173–194. doi: 10.1016/0033-0620(84)90003-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Mulrooney DA, Yeazel MW, Kawashima T, et al. Cardiac outcomes in a cohort of adult survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: retrospective analysis of the childhood cancer survivor study cohort. Br Med J. 2009;339:b4606. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.van den Heuvel DA, van Es HW, Cirkel GA, Bos WJ. Acute chest pain caused by pericardial fat necrosis. Thorax. 2010;65:188. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.114637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Pineda V, Cáceres J, Andreu J, Vilar J, Domingo ML. Epipericardial fat necrosis: radiologic diagnosis and follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:1234–1236. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Knockaert DC. Cardiac involvement in systemic inflammatory diseases. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1797–1804. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Al-Mehisen R, Alnemri K, Al-Mohaissen M. Cardiac imaging of a patient with unusual presentation of granulomatosis with polyangiitis: a case report and review of the literature. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 162.Marmursztejn J, Guillevin L, Trebossen R, Cohen P, Guilpain P, Pagnoux C, et al. Churg-Strauss syndrome cardiac involvement evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and positron-emission tomography: a prospective study on 20 patients. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013;52:642–650. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Perel-Winkler A, Bokhari S, Perez-Recio T, Zartoshti A, Askanase A, Geraldino-Pardilla L. Myocarditis in systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosed by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Lupus Sci Med. 2018;12(5):e000265. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2018-000265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Yamashita H, Kubota K, Takahashi Y, Minamimoto R, Morooka M, Kaneko H, et al. Clinical value of 18F-fluoro-dexoxyglucose positron emission tomography/ computed tomography in patients with adult-onset Still's disease: a seven-case series and review of the literature. Mod Rheumatol. 2014;24:645–650. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2013.850998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Dahl A, Schaadt BK, Santoni-Rugiu E, Bruun NE. Molecular imaging in Libman-Sacks endocarditis. Infect Dis (Lond) 2015;47:263–266. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2014.984323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Lee SH, Seo JB, Kang JW, Chae EJ, Park SH, Lim TH. Incidental cardiac and pericardial abnormalities on chest CT. J Thorac Imaging. 2008;23:216–226. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e318166a485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Arad Y, Spadaro LA, Goodman K, Lledo-Perez A, Sherman S, Lerner G, et al. Predictive value of electron beam computed tomography of the coronary arteries 19-month follow-up of 1173 asymptomatic subjects. Circulation. 1996;93:1951–1953. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.11.1951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Moore EH, Greenberg RW, Merrick SH, Miller SW, McLoud TC, Shepard JA. Coronary artery calcifications: significance of incidental detention on CT. Radiology. 1989;172:711–716. doi: 10.1148/radiology.172.3.2772178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M, Sugiura A, Harigaya H, Sato T, et al. Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:319–326. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.McKenney-Drake M, Moghbel M, Paydary K, Alloosh M, Houshmand S, Moe S, et al. 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG as molecular probes in the evaluation of atherosclerosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:2190–2200. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4078-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Moghbel M, Al-Zaghal A, Werner TJ, Constantinescu CM, HoilunCarlsen PF, Alavi A. The role of PET in evaluating atherosclerosis: a critical review. Semin Nucl Med. 2018;48:488–497. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2018.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Mayer M, Borja AJ, Hancin EC, Auslander T, Revheim ME, Moghbel MC, et al. Imaging atherosclerosis by PET, with emphasis on the role of FDG and NaF as potential biomarkers for this disorder. Front Physiol. 2020;22(11):511391. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.511391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Dunphy MP, Freiman A, Larson SM, Strauss HW. Association of vascular 18F-FDG uptake with vascular calcification. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1278–1284. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Shemesh J, Apter S, Itzchak Y, Motro M. Coronary calcification compared in patients with acute versus in those with chronic coronary events by using dual-sector spiral CT. Radiology. 2003;226:483–488. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2262011903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Stolzmann P, Subramanian S, Abdelbaky A, Maurovich-Horvat P, Scheffel H, Tawakol A, Hoffmann U. Complementary value of cardiac FDG PET and CT for the characterization of atherosclerotic disease. Radiographics. 2011;31:1255–1269. doi: 10.1148/rg.315115028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Kimura F, Matsuo Y, Nakajima T, Nishikawa T, Kawamura S, Sannohe S, et al. Myocardial fat at cardiac imaging: how can we differentiate pathologic from physiologic fatty infiltration? Radiographics. 2010;30:1587–1602. doi: 10.1148/rg.306105519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Robles P, Sonlleva A. Myocardial calcification and subendocardial fatty replacement of the left ventricle following myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2007;23:667–670. doi: 10.1007/s10554-006-9196-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Adler Y, Fink N, Spector D, Wiser I, Sagie A. Mitral annulus calcification—a window to diffuse atherosclerosis of the vascular system. Atherosclerosis. 2001;155:1–8. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(00)00737-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Foster M, Nolan RL, Lam M. Prediction of anemia on unenhanced computed tomography of the thorax. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2003;54:26–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Title RS, Harper K, Nelson E, Evans T, Tello R. Observer performance in assessing anemia on thoracic CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:1240–1244. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Kamel EM, Rizzo E, Duchosal MA, Duran R, Goncalves-Matoso V, Schnyder P, Qanadli SD. Radiological profile of anemia on unenhanced MDCT of the thorax. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1863–1868. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0950-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]