Abstract
Background
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification, as the most abundant RNA modification, widely participates in the physiological process and is involved in multiple disease progression, especially cancer. YTH N6-methyladenosine RNA binding protein 1 (YTHDF1) is a pivotal m6A “reader” protein, which has been reported in multiple cancers. However, the role and molecular mechanism of YTHDF1 in HCC are still not fully elucidated.
Methods
Based on various bioinformatics databases, q-RT PCR, western blot, and a tissue microarray containing 90 HCC samples, we examined the expression of YTHDF1 in HCC. Then, we applied the loss-of-function experiments to explore the role of YTHDF1 in HCC by in vitro and in vivo assays. Finally, we performed the gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to predict the potential signaling pathway of YTHDF1 involved in HCC and further verified this prediction.
Results
YTHDF1 was overexpressed in HCC and associated with HCC grade. Depletion of YTHDF1 markedly impaired the proliferation, migration, invasion, and cell cycle process of HCC cells. Mechanistically, YTHDF1 promoted the growth of HCC cells via activating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Moreover, we also demonstrated that the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) mediated the promoting effect of YTHDF1 on the migration and invasion of HCC cells.
Conclusions
YTHDF1 contributes to the progression of HCC by activating PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway and inducing EMT.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40164-021-00227-0.
Keywords: Liver cancer, YTHDF1, m6A, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, EMT
Background
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, which has caused a severe health burden globally [1, 2]. Although the development of novel drugs for HCC has taken a historic step in light of the approval of several multi-kinase inhibitors and immune inhibitors in recent years, the mortality of patients with HCC remains highly [3–5].
It has been well verified that epigenetic modification is significant in bioprocesses and disease progression. Among the over 100 kinds of chemical modifications found in various RNAs, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant internal RNA modification [6, 7]. m6A modification is dynamically recognized and regulated by “writer”, “eraser”, and “reader” proteins [8]. “Writers” represent multiple methyltransferases, including the essential components methyltransferase like 3 and 14 (METTL3/METTL14) and other subunits WT1 associated protein (WTAP) and KIAA1429 [6, 8, 9]. As a reversible modification, m6A is removed by demethylases (“erasers”) belonging to the AlkB family proteins of dioxygenases, specifically the FTO alpha-ketoglutarate dependent dioxygenase (FTO) and AlkB homolog 5, RNA demethylase (ALKBH5) [6, 8]. The “readers” are mainly responsible for recognizing and binding to m6A-modified RNAs and affecting their fate and function through post-transcriptional regulation.
YTH N6-methyladenosine RNA binding protein 1 (YTHDF1), as a pivotal m6A “reader,” mainly acts as a translation initiation promotor by interacting with initiation factor eIF3 [10]. As the role of YTHDF1 in m6A modification has been revealed, more studies have described the effects of YTHDF1 on disease progression, especially cancer. Specifically, studies have shown that YTHDF1 is high-expressed in multiple malignancies and promotes the progression of colorectal carcinoma, ovarian cancer, gastric cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma through a range of oncogenic mechanisms [11–16]. Notably, it has also been reported that the loss of YTHDF1 strengthens the cross-presentation of tumor antigens and the cross-priming of CD8 + T cells, and enhances the blocking effect of the programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint in vivo, suggesting that YTHDF1 functions as a potential therapeutic target [17]. However, the role and molecular mechanism of YTHDF1 in HCC are still not fully elucidated.
In this study, we identified that YTHDF1 was significantly overexpressed and associated with a poor prognosis in HCC by bioinformatics analysis and tissue microarrays, and further revealed that YTHDF1 activated the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway and induced EMT, leading to the enhanced proliferation, migration and invasion of HCC cells.
Methods
Tissue specimens and cell culture
After obtaining informed consent and complying with ethical and institutional guidelines, all of 12 tumorous and matched adjacent nontumorous liver tissue specimens were collected from patients with HCC who underwent liver resection due to liver cancer at the Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. All cell lines were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Cegrogen, Germany) in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37 °C.
Cell transfection, cell treatment, and chemical reagents
si-YTHDF1s and negative control siRNA-NC were acquired from Guangzhou Ribobio, China. The selected sequences of siRNAs were as follows: si-YTHDF1-1: 5′-GGAACAACATCTATCAGCA-3′, si-YTHDF1-2: 5′-GCTCAACCGCAGTATCAGA-3′, si-YTHDF1-3: 5′-GGAAACGTCCAGCCTAATT-3′. The establishment of sh-YTHDF1 cell line was co-transfect the vector pLKO.1 expressing sh-YTHDF1 with the packaging vectors psPAX and vesicular stomatitis virus-expressing envelope vector pMD2G in HEK293T cells for 72 h to produce lentiviral particles. After incubating lentivirus in tumor cells for 48 h with polybrene, 1 µg/ml puromycin (Biosharp, China) was used to screen stable cell lines. Cells treated with Human TGF-beta1 (PeproTech, 100-21-10) at 10 ng/ml for 48 h or treated with SC79 (MCE, HY-18749) at 4 µg/ml for 1 h. Cell transfections were conducted using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, USA) according to the instructions and protocols.
Tissue microarrays and immunofluorescence assay
A hepatocellular carcinoma tissue microarray containing 90 tumorous tissues and adjacent nontumorous tissues was acquired from the Shanghai Outdo Biotech (HLiv-H180Su08). The immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of YTHDF1 in these 90 cases was performed as described previously [18]. The IHC staining score (the multiplication of staining intensity and positive percentage) was used to evaluate the expression of YTHDF1. The staining intensity: negative = 0, weak = 1, moderate = 2, and strong = 3; The positive percentage: negative = 0, 1–25% = 1, 26–50% = 2, 51–75% = 3, and 76–100% = 4. IHC staining scores ≥ 4 defined high expression, while scores < 4 defined low expression. The anti-YTHDF1 antibody used in IHC was purchased from Proteintech (17479-1-AP).
The subcellular localization of YTHDF1 was performed by immunofluorescence assay as previously described [19]. Briefly, the cells cultured on the coverslips were washed three times using PBS, then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min, and permeabilized cells by 0.3% Triton X-100 for 10 min. After washing three times with PBS, the cells were blocked in 10% goat serum for 40 min and incubated with anti-YTHDF1 (Proteintech, China) at 4 °C overnight. Cells were washed with PBS for three times and incubated with the secondary antibodies (Proteintech, China) for 2 h. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI for 5 min. Finally, the fluorescence images were observed by fluorescence microscope.
Western blot assay
The protein was dissociated in RIPA buffer (Promoter, Wuhan, China) containing PMSF (Promoter, Wuhan, China) and protease inhibitors cocktail (MCE, USA) for 30 min on ice. The cell lysates were centrifuged at 4 °C for 10 min at high speed. After removing the precipitate, the supernatant was collected to measure protein concentration by BCA kit (Servicebio, Wuhan, China). After boiling the protein added with SDS loading buffer, the protein samples were electrophoresed and transferred onto PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked by 5% non-fat milk dissolved in TBST for 1.5 h and were then incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. After washing the membranes by TBST three times, we incubated them with secondary antibodies for 1.5 h. The images were developed by an imaging system (Tanon 5200 Multi, China). The antibodies used in this study were as follows: anti-YTHDF1 (Proteintech, 17479-1-AP), anti-MMP2 (Proteintech, 10373-2-AP), anti-MMP9 (CST, 13667), anti-Claudin 1 (Bioswamp, PAB33267), anti-ZO-1 (Bioswamp, MAB43858), anti-N-cadherin (Bioswamp, PAB30130), anti-Vimentin (CST, 3390), anti-AKT (CST, 4691), anti-phospho-AKT (CST, 4060), anti-AKT1 (Proteintech, 51077-1-AP), anti-AKT2 (Proteintech, 17609-1-AP), anti-AKT3 (Proteintech, 21641-1-AP), anti-mTOR (CST, 2983), anti-phospho-mTOR (CST, 5536), anti-tubulin (CST, 2125), anti-Cyclin D1 (Proteintech, 60186-1-Ig), anti-CD44 (CST, 37259), anti-GAPDH (Proteintech, 60004-1-lg), anti-beta Actin (Proteintech, 20536-1-AP).
RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR (q-RT PCR)
Total RNA was isolated by trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, America). The reverse transcription of RNA into cDNA was performed using HiScript® II Q Select RT SuperMix for qPCR (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). QuantStudio 3 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, USA) was used for q-RT PCR to detect RNA expression by Hieff® qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Yeasen, Shanghai, China). The q-RT PCR primers were as follows: YTHDF1 forward 5′-ATACCTCACCACCTACGGACA-3′, YTHDF1 reverse 5′-GTGCTGATAGATGTTGTTCCCC-3′, AKT1 forward 5′-GCCCAACACCTTCATCATCC-3′, AKT1 reverse 5′-ACTCCTCCCGCTCCTCAG-3′, AKT2 forward 5′-GCGGAAGGAAGTCATCATTG-3′, AKT2 reverse 5′-GTGGGTCTGGAAGGCATAC-3′, AKT3 forward 5′-TTCTCTGGAGTAAACTGGCAAG-3′, AKT3 reverse 5′-TGGTGTTATTGTAATAGTCTGAGC-3′, ACTIN forward 5′-CATGTACGTTGCTATCCAGGC-3′, ACTIN reverse 5′-CTCCTTAATGTCACGCACGAT-3′.
Cell proliferation assay
Cell proliferation ability was measured by CCK8 assay, colony-forming assay, and EdU staining assay. The CCK8 assay was to culture 1000 cells per well into 96-well plates overnight. The cell culture medium and CCK-8 (Promoter, Wuhan, China) were mixed with a 10:1 ratio to incubate the cells at 37 °C for 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, and 4 h, and then measured the 450 nm absorbance by a microplate reader. These steps were repeated at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. As to colony-forming assay, 1000 cells per well were cultured in 6-well plate for 14 days. After washing the plate 3 times with PBS, we used paraformaldehyde to fix for 10 min and 0.5% crystal violet to stain cells for 10 min. EdU staining assay was performed by 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) assay kit (Ribobio, Guangzhou, China). First, 1 × 105 cells per well were cultured in a 96-well plate and incubated with 50 μM EdU buffer at 37 °C for 2 h. After washing the plate with PBS, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100. Then the cells were incubated by Apollo stain mixture for 30 min and washed with 0.5% Triton X-100 3 times. The nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 reaction solution for 30 min. The images were observed by fluorescence microscope.
Cell cycle assay
5 × 105 cells per well were cultured in a 6-well plate. After digesting and collecting cells, these cells were fixed with 75% ice ethanol at − 20 °C overnight. After centrifuging cells to remove ethanol, the cells were washed with ice PBS. Then these cells were incubated with a 400 µl mixture of propidium iodide (PI) and RNase A (KeyGen Biotech, Nanjing, China) at room temperature over 30 min. The results were analyzed by a FACSAria cell sorting system (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).
Cell migration and invasion assay
Transwell assay and wound healing assay were used to measure the cell migration and invasion. In transwell assay, 4 × 104 cells per well were seeded in a 24-well plate equipped with 8-μm pore size transwell inserts (Corning, NY, USA) with or without Matrigel (Corning, 354234). The upper chamber was filled in a serum-free medium with cells, and the bottom chamber was filled with a serum-contain medium without cells. After incubating for 24 h, the medium was removed and the membrane of inserts was washed with PBS. The cells on the membrane were fixed with paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.5% crystal violet. The images were observed by a light microscope. For wound healing assay, 1 × 106 cells were seed to each well in a 12-well plate. Then, the cells in each well were scratched by plastic tips and the images were captured by light microscope. After incubating 24 h, the cell movement was captured by light microscope.
Bioinformatics analysis
Bioinformatics websites include GEPIA (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn), UALCAN (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/index.html), LinkedOmics (http://www.linkedomics.org/admin.php), and Kaplan–Meier Plotter (http://kmplot.com/analysis/index.php?p=service&cancer=liver_rnaseq).
We downloaded the samples of patient with HCC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, https://www.cancer.gov/tcga/). The sample included 186 cases of high YTHDF1 expression and 185 cases of low YTHDF1 expression. These sample data were processed by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis software (GSEA v4.0.1) to implement BIOCARTA analysis, HALLMARK analysis, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis as previously described [20].
Subcutaneous implantation experiment
All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Tongji Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Ten four-week-old BALB/c male nude mice (GemPharmatech, Jiangsu, China) were subcutaneously injected with control Huh7 cells 2 × 106 (left-back) and stable knockdown of YTHDF1 Huh7 cells 2 × 106 (right-back). These cells were respectively premixed with 50 µl Matrigel (Corning, 354,234) in 100 µl PBS. Then the tumor size was measured every 5–8 days. When the tumors have grown to an appropriate size (about 30 days), they were taken out for weight measurement and volume estimation (volume = 1/2 × length × width2).
Statistical analysis
All experiments were presented as means ± SD from independently repeated experiments at least three times. The experimental data were analyzed by GraphPad Prism 7.0 and SPSS 16.0. The difference between two groups was compared using a 2-tailed Student’s t-test, the survival analysis was evaluated by log-rank test, the correlation analysis was measured by Pearson correlation test. The P-value < 0.05 indicates that the difference is statistically significant (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001).
Results
YTHDF1 was high-expressed in HCC and correlated with poor survival
To explore the expression and clinical correlation of YTHDF1 in HCC, a range of bioinformatics databases were analyzed. We found that YTHDF1 was significantly highly expressed in HCC tissue samples compared with normal liver tissues at mRNA level from GEPIA and UALCAN two databases (Fig. 1A, B). Further analysis from LinkedOmics and UALCAN databases revealed that the mRNA level of YTHDF1 was relatively high in advanced and high-grade HCC tissues, while relatively low in early and low-grade HCC tissues (Fig. 1C–E). In addition, three bioinformatics databases including LinkedOmics, GEPIA, and Kaplan–Meier Plotter were used to conduct survival analysis. The results showed that the HCC patients with high-expression of YTHDF1 had a worse overall survival than patients with low-expression (Fig. 1F–H).
Given the above results analyzed from bioinformatics databases, we implemented multiple assays to verify the expression and clinicopathological correlation of YTHDF1 in HCC. First, the expression of YTHDF1 in a normal liver cell and various HCC cell lines at the protein level were detected by western blot (Fig. 2A) and mRNA level were detected by q-RT PCR (Fig. 2B). The results showed that YTHDF1 was high-expressed in HCC cells at the protein level and mRNA level, including Hep3B, MHCC-97H, Huh7, HepG2, PLC/PRF/5, HCCLM3, SK-HEP-1 and SNU-398, compared with a normal liver cell L02. Simultaneously, it was found that YTHDF1 was also significantly up-regulated in 12 HCC tissues compared with nontumorous tissues (Fig. 2C). The results of immunofluorescence assay indicated that YTHDF1 was distributed in both cytoplasm and nucleus (Fig. 2D).
To further confirm the in situ expression and clinicopathological features of YTHDF1 in patients with HCC, we analyzed a HCC tissue microarray containing 90 tumorous tissues and adjacent nontumorous tissues. The results showed that YTHDF1 was remarkably up-regulated in HCC tissues (P < 0.0001), and the subcellular location of YTHDF1 was consistent with previous immunofluorescence results (Fig. 2E). Besides, the expression of YTHDF1 was correlated with HCC grade (P = 0.015) (Fig. 2F). Specifically, the expression of YTHDF1 in grade 3 HCC was higher than that in grade 2 HCC (Fig. 2F, low right).
Taken together, these results indicated that the expression of YTHDF1 was significantly up-regulated in HCC and was associated with tumor grade. The survival of HCC patients with YTHDF1 high-expression is poor.
YTHDF1 silencing inhibited the tumor properties of HCC cells in vitro and in vivo
We conducted a series of assays to determine the role of YTHDF1 in HCC, especially in cell proliferation, which is essential to tumor malignant progression. In vitro, we successfully down-regulated the mRNA level and protein level of YTHDF1 in Huh7 and MHCC-97H cells via transfecting si-YTHDF1 (Fig. 3A, B). The results of CCK8 assay showed that inhibition of YTHDF1 expression significantly interfered with the proliferation of Huh7 and MHCC-97H cells (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, the colony-forming ability of HCC cells was also impaired by blocking the expression of YTHDF1 (Fig. 3D). Similarly, the results of EdU assay indicated that silencing YTHDF1 suppressed the ability of DNA replication in Huh7 and MHCC-97H cells, which was intuitively reflected by the decreased ratio of fluorescence merged cells in the YTHDF1 knockdown group compared with the control group (Fig. 3E). Besides, flow cytometry was performed to examine the effect of YTHDF1 on the HCC cell cycle process and it showed that the inhibition of YTHDF1 in Huh7 and MHCC-97H cells increased the percentage of G0/G1 cells (Fig. 3F), suggesting that the downregulation of YTHDF1 induced cell cycle arrest of HCC cells. We also constructed stable YTHDF1 knockdown cells sh-YTHDF1 using Huh7 cells. Four-week-old BALB/c male nude mice were used to perform a subcutaneous implantation experiment. The mice were injected subcutaneously with 2 × 106 Huh7 cells treated with sh-YTHDF1 or sh-NC. The size of the tumor was then observed and measured every 5–8 days until the tumor grew to an appropriate size (Fig. 3G). We found that the tumor weight (Fig. 3H) and volume (Fig. 3I) in the YTHDF1 knockdown group were significantly lower than those in the control group. Furthermore, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of the subcutaneously implanted tumors showed the morphology of tumor cells, and IHC staining confirmed the downregulation of YTHDF1 in the shYTHDF1 group (Fig. 3J).
Accumulated evidence shows that RNA m6A modification not only participates in the proliferation of cancer cells, but also affects the metastasis of multiple cancer cells [21–25]. To investigate the potential of YTHDF1 on HCC metastasis, we evaluated it in vitro. The results of transwell migration assay showed that the migratory ability of Huh7 and MHCC-97H cells were significantly suppressed in response to the downregulation of YTHDF1 (Fig. 4A). The invasive capacity was measured by transwell assay equipped with Matrigel, which contained various matrix proteins and was used to simulate cellular basement membrane in vivo. The results showed that the number of cells moving across transwell Matrigel was lessened apparently in the YTHDF1 knockdown group (Fig. 4B), indicating that the inhibition of YTHDF1 expression destroyed the invasive ability of HCC cells. Additionally, similar results were demonstrated by wound healing assay. The migratory proportion of Huh7 and MHCC-97H cells in the YTHDF1-deficient group was decreased markedly than that in the control group after cultured in serum-free medium for 24 h (Fig. 4C).
Collectively, these results suggested that YTHDF1 promoted the proliferation, cell cycle, migration and invasion of HCC cells.
YTHDF1 facilitated the proliferation of HCC cells by activating PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway
To deeply excavate the molecular mechanism of YTHDF1 involved in the progression of HCC, an RNA-seq data set of HCC patient samples from TCGA was collected, which including 186 cases of YTHDF1 high expression and 185 cases of YTHDF1 low expression. Functional enrichment of gene pathways was performed by GSEA using the KEGG gene sets, which classified most genes through signaling pathways and biological processes. The analysis results exhibited that the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway was significantly enriched in the YTHDF1 high expression subset (Fig. 5A). Additionally, correlation analysis by GEPIA showed that multiple key transcripts in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway, such as PIK3CA, PIK3CB, PIK3R2, PIK3R3, PIK3R4, mTOR, AKT1, AKT2, and AKT3, were positively correlated with YTHDF1 transcripts in HCC (Fig. 5B). To confirmed the result of this bioinformatic analysis, subsequent western blot assay was performed and the results indicated that downregulation of YTHDF1 apparently inhibited the protein levels of AKT, p-AKT, mTOR, and p-mTOR (Fig. 5C). Then, we tested the effect of YTHDF1 on the expression of different AKT isoforms. The results of western blot assay showed that the protein levels of AKT2 and AKT3 were inhibited by YTHDF1 silencing, while AKT1 did not change significantly (Fig. 5D). However, q-RT PCR results showed that only the mRNA level of AKT3 in huh7 cells with YTHDF1 knockdown was moderately down-regulated, the mRNA levels of AKT1, AKT2, and AKT3 in MHCC-97H cells with YTHDF1 knockdown did not change or even upregulated (Fig. 5E). Therefore, the downregulation of YTHDF1 only inhibited the translation of AKT2 and AKT3, but did not involve the transcriptional level. Furthermore, the results of EdU assay showed that SC79, one of AKT activators, could partially restore the suppressed effect on cell proliferation induced by YTHDF1 inhibition (Fig. 5F). These results demonstrated that YTHDF1 promoted the proliferation of HCC cells by regulating the activation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway.
YTHDF1 promoted the migration and invasion ability of HCC cells via inducing EMT
The RNA m6A modification has been verified to drive the migration and invasion of cancer cells by inducing EMT [23, 26]. Considering the crucial role of EMT in tumor metastasis, it was worth to investigate whether YTHDF1 was involved in the regulation of the EMT process of HCC cells. Firstly, the expression levels of EMT-transcription factors (EMT-TFs) in Huh7 and MHCC-97H cells with YTHDF1 silencing were detected. The results showed that the expression levels of epithelial cell markers Claudin 1 and zonula occludens protein 1 (ZO-1) were significantly up-regulated, while the expression levels of mesenchymal cell markers matrix metallopeptidase 2 (MMP2), matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9), N-cadherin, and Vimentin were suppressed after YTHDF1 knockdown (Fig. 6A). It suggested that YTHDF1 could induce EMT in HCC cells. To ascertain whether EMT mediates the role of YTHDF1 in the migration and invasion of HCC cells, we treated MHCC-97H cells with TGF-β to induce EMT. The results of western blot assay indicated that TGF-β successfully induced the EMT, and the knockdown of YTHDF1 attenuated the EMT induced by TGF-β (Fig. 6B). Furthermore, the results of transwell assay and wound healing assay showed that TGF-β treatment markedly increased the number of migratory and invasive cells and partly counteracted the inhibitory effect of YTHDF1-deficient on the migration and invasion capabilities of MHCC-97H cells (Fig. 6C, D). Previous studies found that the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway enables inducing the EMT process [27]. To explore whether AKT mediates the induction of EMT by YTHDF1 in HCC, a rescue experiment was performed. The results of western blot assay showed that MHCC-97H cells treated with SC79 to overexpress AKT could not rescue the expression changes of Claudin 1 and Vimentin upon YTHDF1 knockdown (Fig. 6E). In short, EMT was partly responsible for the promotion effect of YTHDF1 on the migration and invasion of HCC cells, and this regulation of EMT by YTHDF1 does not depend on the AKT/ mTOR signaling pathway.
Discussion
The study of epigenetic modification, especially RNA m6A modification in tumors, has been developed rapidly in recent years. YTHDF1, as a pivotal “reader” protein in m6A regulators, plays important role in different kinds of cancers [11–16]. However, the exact and thorough role and molecular mechanism of YTHDF1 on the occurrence and development of HCC is still not fully understood.
In this study, we uncovered that YTHDF1 was significantly overexpressed in HCC cells and tissues and was related to the grading of HCC by using databases analysis, western blot, q-RT PCR and tissue microarrays. Similarly, multiple studies have shown that YTHDF1 was significantly up-regulated in HCC and was associated with poor survival of patients with HCC by using bioinformatics and tissue samples analysis [28–35]. Previous studies demonstrated that YTHDF1 facilitated the proliferation, migration, and invasion of MHCC-LM3 and HepG2 two HCC cells [16, 36]. Our study confirmed this promotion effect of YTHDF1 in the other two HCC cell lines Huh7 and MHCC-97H, which to a certain extent ruled out the cell dependence of YTHDF1 on this carcinogenic role of HCC. Interestingly, our study also demonstrated that YTHDF1 facilitated HCC cell cycle progression, which was predicted and indicated by previous studies [28, 29, 36].
The PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway plays a broad spectrum role in physiology, and its dysregulation often leads to multiple diseases, including cancer [37–40]. There is evidence that the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway mediates the function of m6A “writers” METTL3 and METTL14 in the progression of gastric cancer and retinoblastoma [41, 42]. In HCC, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is overexpressed in 40–50% of samples [43]. The abnormal activation of this well-characterized pathway affects cell proliferation and metabolism, and leads to less tumor differentiation, poor prognosis, and earlier recurrence in HCC, but has nothing to do with the underlying etiology of HCC [43]. Based on the previous study [36], we found that the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway might be associated with the carcinogenic role of YTHDF1 in HCC by using bioinformatic GSEA. Then, the results of western blot assay indicated that the downregulation of YTHDF1 significantly decreased the expression of key pathway proteins AKT, p-AKT, mTOR, and p-mTOR. Notably, we found that YTHDF1 mainly up-regulated the translation of AKT2 and AKT3, rather than their transcription. Indeed, a previous study identified that YTHDF1 was a translation initiation promotor [10]. Therefore, we speculated that YTHDF1 might directly interact with AKT2 and AKT3 to promote the progression of HCC. Additionally, treatment with a specific AKT activator SC79 partly rescued the suppression of HCC cell proliferation in YTHDF1-deficient cells. Our study also found that high-expressed YTHDF1 samples from TCGA were significantly enriched in the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway in the BIOCARTA database (Additional file 1: Figure S1A). The results of western blot assay indicated that the downregulation of YTHDF1 strikingly suppressed the expression of key downstream proteins of WNT/β-catenin pathway such as Cyclin D1 and CD44 in HCC (Additional file 1: Figure S1B). This result is consistent with previous study [16]. It is suggested that there may be multiple signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms involved in the carcinogenesis of HCC induced by YTHDF1, which needs to be further deep explored.
EMT is a reversible cellular process that is activated in almost all malignant tumor progression [44]. Universally, it is believed that EMT plays an important role in tumor metastasis due to the enhanced ability of cell dissemination and motion [44, 45]. Studies showed that m6A modification was involved in the EMT process in various cancers, including gastric cancer, lung cancer, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and colorectal cancer [23, 46–48]. Here, we found that the suppression of YTHDF1 could up-regulate the expression of epithelial cell markers Claudin 1 and ZO-1 and inhibit the expression of mesenchymal cell markers MMP2, MMP9, N-cadherin, and Vimentin in HCC cells. Furthermore, the knockdown of YTHDF1 attenuated the EMT induced by TGF-β. Previously, Lin et al. [26] revealed that downregulation of m6A by inhibiting the expression of METTL3 disturbed the EMT process. Notably, they also found that Snail, a key EMT-TFs, can be combined by YTHDF1 to its mRNA CDS, thereby promoting its translation in HeLa and HepG2 cells [26]. It is suggested that YTHDF1 may induce EMT activation in HCC. Similarly, Bian et al. [36] also preliminarily explored the regulatory relationship between YTHDF1 and EMT in HCC. Considering that there was evidence that the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway promoted the EMT process [27], we detected whether YTHDF1 induced EMT by activating AKT. The results showed that HCC cells treated with the AKT inducer SC79 could not rescue the changes in the protein abundance of Claudin 1 and Vimentin after YTHDF1 knockdown. Therefore, our study further confirmed that YTHDF1 induced the EMT process in an AKT-independent manner to promote the migration and invasion of HCC cells. However, whether YTHDF1 directly interacts with key molecules in an m6A-dependent manner to regulate PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway and EMT remains to be further elucidated.
Conclusions
In summary, our study demonstrates that YTHDF1 is significantly up-regulated in HCC and is correlated with HCC grade. It may be a potential prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target of HCC. YTHDF1 facilitates the proliferation of HCC cells by activating PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway and promotes the migration and invasion of HCC cells by inducing EMT.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- HCC
Hepatocellular carcinoma
- m6A
N6-methyladenosine
- YTHDF1
YTH N6-methyladenosine RNA binding protein 1
- PI3K
Phosphoinositide 3‐kinase
- AKT
AKT serine/threonine kinase
- mTOR
Mammalian target of rapamycin
- EMT
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition
- METTL3/14
Methyltransferase like 3 and 14
- WTAP
WT1 associated protein
- FTO
FTO alpha-ketoglutarate dependent dioxygenase
- ALKBH5
AlkB homolog 5, RNA demethylase
- PD-L1
Programmed cell death 1 ligand 1
- EMT-TFs
EMT-transcription factors
- TGF-β
Transforming growth factor-beta
- PI
Propidium iodide
- TCGA
The cancer genome atlas
- GSEA
Gene set enrichment analysis
- KEGG
Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes
- H&E
Hematoxylin and eosin
- IHC
Immunohistochemical
- MMP2
Matrix metallopeptidase 2
- MMP9
Matrix metallopeptidase 9
- ZO-1
Zonula occludens protein 1
Authors’ contributions
XYL and XXH designed the study; XYL performed most of the experiments in this study and wrote the manuscript; MDC assisted in completing animal experiments and participated in revising the manuscript; FG revised the manuscript; XXH supervised the study process and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81772969).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The human tissue acquisition and animal experiment conduction in this study were approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The human tissue acquisition was also obtained informed consent from patients.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Villanueva A. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1450–62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1713263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liu F, Qin L, Liao Z, Song J, Yuan C, Liu Y, et al. Microenvironment characterization and multi-omics signatures related to prognosis and immunotherapy response of hepatocellular carcinoma. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2020;9:10. doi: 10.1186/s40164-020-00165-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Llovet JM, Montal R, Sia D, Finn RS. Molecular therapies and precision medicine for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15:599–616. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0073-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhu XD, Sun HC. Emerging agents and regimens for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12:110. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0794-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Luo X-Y, Wu K-M, He X-X. Advances in drug development for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical trials and potential therapeutic targets. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40:172. doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-01968-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Roundtree IA, Evans ME, Pan T, He C. Dynamic RNA modifications in gene expression regulation. Cell. 2017;169:1187–200. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhao Y, Shi Y, Shen H, Xie W. m(6)A-binding proteins: the emerging crucial performers in epigenetics. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13:35. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00872-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Huang H, Weng H, Chen J. m(6)A modification in coding and non-coding RNAs: roles and therapeutic implications in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2020;37:270–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zeng C, Huang W, Li Y, Weng H. Roles of METTL3 in cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic targeting. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13:117. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00951-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang X, Zhao BS, Roundtree IA, Lu Z, Han D, Ma H, et al. N(6)-methyladenosine modulates messenger RNA translation efficiency. Cell. 2015;161:1388–1399. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bai Y, Yang C, Wu R, Huang L, Song S, Li W, et al. YTHDF1 regulates tumorigenicity and cancer stem cell-like activity in human colorectal carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2019;9:332. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nishizawa Y, Konno M, Asai A, Koseki J, Kawamoto K, Miyoshi N, et al. Oncogene c-Myc promotes epitranscriptome m(6)A reader YTHDF1 expression in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2018;9:7476–86. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liu T, Wei Q, Jin J, Luo Q, Liu Y, Yang Y, et al. The m6A reader YTHDF1 promotes ovarian cancer progression via augmenting EIF3C translation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:3816–31. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pi J, Wang W, Ji M, Wang X, Wei X, Jin J, et al. YTHDF1 promotes gastric carcinogenesis by controlling translation of FZD7. Cancer Res. 2020 doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-0066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shi Y, Fan S, Wu M, Zuo Z, Li X, Jiang L, et al. YTHDF1 links hypoxia adaptation and non-small cell lung cancer progression. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4892. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12801-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu X, Qin J, Gao T, Li C, He B, Pan B, et al. YTHDF1 facilitates the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma by promoting FZD5 mRNA translation in an m6A-dependent manner. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2020;22:750–65. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.09.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 17.Han D, Liu J, Chen C, Dong L, Liu Y, Chang R, et al. Anti-tumour immunity controlled through mRNA m(6)A methylation and YTHDF1 in dendritic cells. Nature. 2019;566:270–4. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0916-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Xie J, Li Y, Jiang K, Hu K, Zhang S, Dong X, et al. CDK16 phosphorylates and degrades p53 to promote radioresistance and predicts prognosis in lung cancer. Theranostics. 2018;8:650–62. doi: 10.7150/thno.21963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liu Q, Li A, Yu S, Qin S, Han N, Pestell RG, et al. DACH1 antagonizes CXCL8 to repress tumorigenesis of lung adenocarcinoma and improve prognosis. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11:53. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0597-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dong B, Yi M, Luo S, Li A, Wu K. RDGN-based predictive model for the prognosis of breast cancer. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2020;9:13. doi: 10.1186/s40164-020-00169-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jin D, Guo J, Wu Y, Du J, Yang L, Wang X, et al. m(6)A mRNA methylation initiated by METTL3 directly promotes YAP translation and increases YAP activity by regulating the MALAT1-miR-1914-3p-YAP axis to induce NSCLC drug resistance and metastasis. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12:135. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0830-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 22.Ma JZ, Yang F, Zhou CC, Liu F, Yuan JH, Wang F, et al. METTL14 suppresses the metastatic potential of hepatocellular carcinoma by modulating N(6)-methyladenosine-dependent primary microRNA processing. Hepatology. 2017;65:529–43. doi: 10.1002/hep.28885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yue B, Song C, Yang L, Cui R, Cheng X, Zhang Z, et al. METTL3-mediated N6-methyladenosine modification is critical for epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of gastric cancer. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:142. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1065-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang C, Huang S, Zhuang H, Ruan S, Zhou Z, Huang K, et al. YTHDF2 promotes the liver cancer stem cell phenotype and cancer metastasis by regulating OCT4 expression via m6A RNA methylation. Oncogene. 2020;39:4507–18. doi: 10.1038/s41388-020-1303-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chang G, Shi L, Ye Y, Shi H, Zeng L, Tiwary S, et al. YTHDF3 induces the translation of m(6)A-enriched gene transcripts to promote breast cancer brain metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2020;38:857–871. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lin X, Chai G, Wu Y, Li J, Chen F, Liu J, et al. RNA m(6)A methylation regulates the epithelial mesenchymal transition of cancer cells and translation of Snail. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2065. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09865-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 27.Karimi Roshan M, Soltani A, Soleimani A, Rezaie Kahkhaie K, Afshari AR, Soukhtanloo M. Role of AKT and mTOR signaling pathways in the induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process. Biochimie. 2019;165:229–34. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2019.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhao X, Chen Y, Mao Q, Jiang X, Jiang W, Chen J, et al. Overexpression of YTHDF1 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Biomark. 2018;21:859–68. doi: 10.3233/CBM-170791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhou Y, Yin Z, Hou B, Yu M, Chen R, Jin H, et al. Expression profiles and prognostic significance of RNA N6-methyladenosine-related genes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: evidence from independent datasets. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:3921–31. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S191565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Qu N, Qin S, Zhang X, Bo X, Liu Z, Tan C, et al. Multiple m(6)A RNA methylation modulators promote the malignant progression of hepatocellular carcinoma and affect its clinical prognosis. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:165. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6638-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Huang H, Bai Y, Lu X, Xu Y, Zhao H, Sang X. N6-methyladenosine associated prognostic model in hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:633. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-2894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Liu J, Sun G, Pan S, Qin M, Ouyang R, Li Z, et al. The cancer genome atlas (TCGA) based m(6)A methylation-related genes predict prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Bioengineered. 2020;11:759–68. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2020.1787764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wu X, Zhang X, Tao L, Dai X, Chen P. Prognostic value of an m6A RNA methylation regulator-based signature in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:2053902. doi: 10.1155/2020/2053902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhao Z, Yang L, Fang S, Zheng L, Wu F, Chen W, et al. The effect of m6A methylation regulatory factors on the malignant progression and clinical prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1435. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kong W, Li X, Xu H, Gao Y. Development and validation of a m(6)A-related gene signature for predicting the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomark Med. 2020;14:1217–28. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2020-0178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bian S, Ni W, Zhu M, Song Q, Zhang J, Ni R, et al. Identification and validation of the N6-methyladenosine RNA methylation regulator YTHDF1 as a novel prognostic marker and potential target for hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Mol Biosci. 2020;7:604766. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.604766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Manning BD, Toker A. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating the network. Cell. 2017;169:381–405. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hua H, Kong Q, Zhang H, Wang J, Luo T, Jiang Y. Targeting mTOR for cancer therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12:71. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0754-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lin L, Huang Y, Zhuang W, Lin P, Ma X. miR-100 inhibits cell proliferation in mantle cell lymphoma by targeting mTOR. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2020;9:25. doi: 10.1186/s40164-020-00182-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wu J, Cang S, Liu C, Ochiai W, Chiao JW. Development of human prostate cancer stem cells involves epigenomic alteration and PI3K/AKT pathway activation. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2020;9:12. doi: 10.1186/s40164-020-00168-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Liu X, Xiao M, Zhang L, Li L, Zhu G, Shen E, et al. The m6A methyltransferase METTL14 inhibits the proliferation, migration, and invasion of gastric cancer by regulating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. J Clin Lab Anal. 2021;35:e23655. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhang H, Zhang P, Long C, Ma X, Huang H, Kuang X, et al. m6A methyltransferase METTL3 promotes retinoblastoma progression via PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24:12368–78. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Matter MS, Decaens T, Andersen JB, Thorgeirsson SS. Targeting the mTOR pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma: current state and future trends. J Hepatol. 2014;60:855–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.11.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dongre A, Weinberg RA. New insights into the mechanisms of epithelial–mesenchymal transition and implications for cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;20:69–84. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0080-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yi M, Zhang J, Li A, Niu M, Yan Y, Jiao Y, et al. The construction, expression, and enhanced anti-tumor activity of YM101: a bispecific antibody simultaneously targeting TGF-beta and PD-L1. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14:27. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01045-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wanna-Udom S, Terashima M, Lyu H, Ishimura A, Takino T, Sakari M, et al. The m6A methyltransferase METTL3 contributes to transforming growth factor-beta-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition of lung cancer cells through the regulation of JUNB. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;524:150–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.01.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yu X, Zhao H, Cao Z. The m6A methyltransferase METTL3 aggravates the progression of nasopharyngeal carcinoma through inducing EMT by m6A-modified snail mRNA. Minerva Med. 2020 doi: 10.23736/S0026-4806.20.06653-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chen X, Xu M, Xu X, Zeng K, Liu X, Pan B, et al. METTL14-mediated N6-methyladenosine modification of SOX4 mRNA inhibits tumor metastasis in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:106. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-01220-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.