Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0252569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252569

Predictors for carotid and femoral artery intima-media thickness in a non-diabetic sleep clinic cohort

Christopher Lambeth 1,2, Rita Perri 1,2, Sharon Lee 1,2, Manisha Verma 1,2, Nicole Campbell-Rogers 3, George Larcos 3,4, Karen Byth 5, Kristina Kairaitis 1,2,4, Terence Amis 1,2,4,*, John Wheatley 1,2,4
Editor: Giuseppe Andò6
PMCID: PMC8177540  PMID: 34086802

Abstract

Introduction

The impact of sleep disordered breathing (SDB) on arterial intima-media thickness (IMT), a surrogate measure for cardiovascular disease, remains uncertain, in part because of the potential for non-SDB vascular risk factor interactions. In the present study, we determined predictors for common carotid (CCA) and femoral (CFA) artery IMT in an adult, sleep clinic cohort where non-SDB vascular risk factors (particularly diabetes) were eliminated or controlled.

Methods

We recruited 296 participants for polysomnography (standard SDB severity metrics) and CCA/CFA ultrasound examinations, followed by a 12 month vascular risk factor minimisation (RFM) and continuous positive pressure (CPAP) intervention for participants with a range of SDB severity (RFM Sub-Group, n = 157; apnea hyponea index [AHI]: 14.7 (7.2–33.2), median [IQR]). Univariable and multivariable linear regression models determined independent predictors for IMT. Linear mixed effects modelling determined independent predictors for IMT change across the intervention study. P<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Age, systolic blood pressure and waist:hip ratio were identified as non-SDB predictive factors for CCA IMT and age, weight and total cholesterol:HDL ratio for CFA IMT. No SDB severity metric emerged as an independent predictor for either CCA or CFA IMT, except in the RFM Sub-Group, where a 2-fold increase in AHI predicted a 2.4% increase in CFA IMT. Across the intervention study, CCA IMT decreased in those who lost weight, but there was no CPAP use interaction. CFA IMT, however, decreased by 12.9% (95%CI 6.8, 18.7%, p = 0.001) in those participants who both lost weight and used CPAP > = 4hours/night.

Conclusion

We conclude that SDB severity has little impact on CCA IMT values when non-SDB vascular risk factors are minimised or not present. This is the first study, however, to suggest a potential linkage between SDB severity and CFA IMT values.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12611000250932 and ACTRN12620000694910.

Introduction

Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is a common consequence of increased upper airway resistance during sleep [1]. SDB is associated with a number of different comorbidities, including both cardio- and cerebrovascular disease [24]. While the mechanisms underlying these associations remain poorly understood, epidemiological studies suggest a strong relationship between obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and stroke [5, 6]. People with moderate to severe OSA were at substantially increased risk of stroke in the Busselton Sleep Cohort [5], while stroke risk for men in the Sleep Heart Health Study increased by 6% for each unit increase in apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) between 5–25 events/hr [6].

A number of plausible mechanisms have been proposed linking SDB and macrovascular disease, including intermittent hypoxia, intrathoracic pressure swings and sleep fragmentation [4, 7]. But despite the plausibility of a mechanistic role for SDB, the evidence is not clear. The SAVE trial failed to support a causal relationship between OSA and cardiovascular disease showing no significant reduction of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events when OSA was treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) [8]. It is possible, however, that more sensitive measures of cardiovascular benefit were overlooked.

One such measure may be the carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), which is a simple and non-invasive ultrasonographic method to evaluate subclinical cardiovascular disease and early atherosclerosis, and a predictor of future cerebral and cardiovascular events [9, 10]. The potential confounding influence of known macro-vascular disease risk factors (RF) makes it difficult to clarify interactions with OSA. Further, the high prevalence of these RFs in sleep clinic cohorts means an independent effect for SDB is likely to be difficult to detect. This issue was highlighted in a recent meta-analysis of 18 studies comparing carotid IMT for individuals with and without OSA [11]. The authors found strong heterogeneity in study results suggesting inconsistency in adjustment for confounding factors. Moreover, in a sub-group analysis, better matching of confounding variables uncovered an increase in carotid IMT for OSA patients compared to controls, and a significant correlation between AHI and carotid IMT (r = 0.389; P<0.001).

While the focus of SDB research has been on associations with the carotid IMT, it has been suggested recently that the femoral artery IMT may be a more sensitive marker of cardiovascular risk [12, 13]. While femoral and carotid IMT are strongly correlated with each other, the RFs associated with each differ [14]. It has also been suggested that local haemodynamic factors may have a larger impact on the development of atherosclerosis in the carotid artery than in the femoral artery and, thus, systemic RFs may be more important for the femoral artery [15]. Thus, there is appeal in exploring the relationship between SDB and femoral IMT.

CPAP therapy is first line treatment for OSA, however, reported effects of CPAP on carotid IMT are inconsistent [1620]. While there are some methodological concerns about these studies, a recent meta-analysis found CPAP had no overall effect on carotid IMT in OSA patients [21], but there was a decrease in carotid IMT in a sub-group of patients with more severe OSA and longer term CPAP use. It is possible that studying the femoral IMT, as a surrogate measure of vascular health, may be advantageous in exploring the effects of CPAP.

Accordingly, the aims of the present study were to determine predictors for carotid and femoral IMT in a sleep clinic cohort and determine their relationships with SDB severity. In our study design, we attempted to minimise interactions with classical non-SDB vascular disease RFs by excluding individuals with diabetes. We then combined objective ultrasound measurements of IMT with gold-standard, in-laboratory, polysomnography (PSG) for assessment of SDB. The study involved a cross-sectional analysis in which statistical modelling was used to search for significant predictive variables based on improvements in estimates of explained variance. We also included a longitudinal (12-month), intervention-based sub-group study, aimed at complementing the main cross-sectional study results by testing the impact on IMT of minimising SDB using CPAP when superimposed on a background of medically supervised vascular disease RF stabilisation.

Methods

Protocol and registration

The study described in this manuscript was not registered as a clinical trial before enrolment of participants because it was originally designed as an observational study, however, the authors now confirm that all related trials included in the analysis described in this manuscript have now been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR; Trial Ids: ACTRN12611000250932 and ACTRN12620000694910).

Study participants

We recruited 373 adults all over the age of 35 years, with no known history of carotid artery disease/surgery, all referred to a research sleep clinic between 5th September 2011 and 25th July 2016, for investigation of potential SDB and all evaluated by the same senior sleep physician (Author: KK). Participants were screened for diabetes and 42 were subsequently excluded on the basis of either a history of diabetes or a fasting blood sugar level (BSL fasting) ≥ 7 mmol/L, while 35 other participants either withdrew from the study or were excluded for other reasons (e.g. failure to attend study visits). The remaining 296 participants formed the study “Main Group”.

Participants were then invited to participate in a 12-month duration RF minimisation intervention (RFM) sub-study conducted between 13th September 2011 and 6th December 2016. A feature of this sub-study was that individuals encompassing a wide range of SDB severity levels were invited to participate, with the goal of recruiting participants with a range of SDB severity for analysis purposes. Enrichment of this sub-group with individuals across the SDB severity spectrum meant that some were included in the sub-study who wouldn’t have been considered for CPAP on clinical criteria. A total of 157 participants (“RFM Sub-Group”) agreed to enter this phase of the study and committed to regular monitoring and 12 month follow-up data collection. Fig 1 shows a flow diagram of the study design. Informed written consent was obtained, and the protocol was approved by the Sydney West Area Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee.

Fig 1. Study flow diagram.

Fig 1

Study flow diagram showing movement of participants and data through the recruitment and screening phases, the “Main Group” and “Risk Factor Minimisatation [RFM] Sub-Group” cross-sectional analyses, and the intervention study. SDB = sleep disordered breathing; BSL = blood sugar level; PSG = polysomnography; CPAP = continuous positive airway pressure; AHI = apnea hypopnea index; CCA IMT = common carotid artery intima-media thickness.

Study protocol

Cross-sectional study

The Main Group study protocol included measurement of anthropometric data (height, weight, body mass index [BMI], waist circumference, hip circumference, waist hip ratio [WHR], neck circumference), detailed medical history (history of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia), smoking history (current plus past smokers versus never smoked), measurement of blood pressure (BP), fasting blood tests (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol, glucose) and assessment of cardiovascular risk (Framingham Risk Score). Carotid and femoral artery IMT were measured using B-mode ultrasound [22, 23], while sleep disordered breathing was assessed via in-laboratory overnight standard polysomnography (PSG) [24].

Polysomnography

Sleep disordered breathing was assessed by standard polysomnography [24]. Nasal pressure was used to measure airflow for scoring hypopneas. Pulse oximetry recorded blood oxygen saturation (SpO2). Studies were scored, using Compumedics Profusion PSG4 software (Compumedics Limited; Abbotsford, Victoria, Australia) according to standard guidelines [24, 25] and apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI), respiratory disturbance index (RDI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI >3%), arousal index (AI), the percentage of sleep time spent with oxygen saturation below 90% (SpO2<90%) and the lowest SpO2 during NREM and REM sleep were all calculated.

OSA severity was categorised by AHI as normal (AHI<5 events/hr), mild (5≤AHI<15 events/hr), moderate (15≤AHI<30 events/hr) or severe (AHI≥30 events/hr). For analysis, OSA was also categorised as either non-severe (AHI<30 events/hr) or severe (AHI≥30 events/hr).

In the RFM Sub-Group, snoring sounds were recorded using a unidirectional sound level meter (Rion) suspended 60 cm above the subject. Snores were counted manually and expressed as snores/hr of sleep.

Carotid & femoral ultrasound

Carotid and common femoral artery B-mode ultrasounds were obtained using a SonoSite M-Turbo ultrasound system, using either a HFL38x 13–6 MHz or an L38x 10–5 MHz transducer (Fujifilm SonoSite, Inc; Bothell, WA, USA). Participants lay supine with their upper body slightly raised, neck extended and turned contralateral to the side being examined. Several longitudinal images were obtained of the common carotid artery (CCA), with the carotid bulb visible at the far left of the image and at least 20mm of the CCA intima-media layer proximal to the bulb. Similar images were obtained of the common femoral artery (CFA) with the participant supine and their leg slightly abducted, with the femoral bifurcation at the far right of the image and at least 20mm of CFA intima-media layer proximal to the bifurcation. The images were stored for later offline analysis.

A single experienced sonographer assessed the images and made IMT measurements using the SonoCalc IMT software (Fujifilm Sonosite, Inc) trace methodology with at least three reference points. Measurements were made on the posterior wall of the CCA and CFA over a 10mm segment, with measurements in the CCA acquired in a 10–20 mm segment inferior to the carotid bulb. The software calculated the mean IMT. All IMT measurements were acquired three times for each location (left and right CCA, left and right CFA) and these three values were then averaged to give a single measurement for each site. Left and right values were then averaged to give overall CCA and CFA IMT values.

Longitudinal (RFM) intervention study

After recruitment to the intervention study, participants (RFM Sub-Group) with hypertension or hypercholesterolaemia were prescribed appropriate medication and had a 1-month run-in period to allow stabilisation of their blood pressure and lipids before undergoing a second PSG to determine the appropriate CPAP pressure [26] for treatment of their sleep disordered breathing. They were assigned a CPAP machine (ResMed S9; ResMed Ltd., Bella Vista, NSW, Australia; or Respironics System One; Philips Respironics, Murrysville, PA, USA) and fitted with an appropriate mask. Over the next 12-months, participants received personalised support, including monthly medical monitoring of their health and medication status, counselling to encourage continued nightly CPAP use, and regular downloads of their CPAP usage. At the conclusion of the study, repeat measures of anthropometrics, blood pressure and carotid/femoral IMT were obtained and data were analysed for CPAP compliance (hours of use).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 24.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Except where stated, P<0.05 was considered significant.

Note: The study described in this manuscript deviates from the registered clinical trials (ACTRN12611000250932 and ACTRN12620000694910). Both trials were conducted simultaneously, used the same methodologies, and addressed the same outcome variables, but with study cohorts focused on different degrees of sleep disordered breathing severity. However, because there was considerable overlap in the range of measured sleep disordered breathing severities between the two study cohorts they were combined post hoc into one overarching analysis.

Cross-sectional study

Group data were summarised using mean (± standard deviation) or median (interquartile range), where appropriate, for continuous variables, and frequency and percentage for categorical variables. Since many continuous variables were skewed, Spearman rank correlation (r) was used to quantify the pairwise associations between them. Linear regression was used to define the age relationship for both CCA and CFA IMT. Differences between the RFM Minimisation Sub-Group and those Main Group participants not included in the RFM study were tested using two-samples t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests where appropriate for continuous variables, and chi-square tests for categorical variables.

Our analysis strategy first identified non-sleep related variables predictive of IMT operating within the data set (base models) and then assessed the impact of adding individual SDB variables to the base models as described below. IMT and the continuous SDB variable values were skewed. These data were log transformed (after adding 1 to SDB variables to deal with potential zero values) to approximate Normality and to stabilise the variance prior to analysis. Model parameter estimates for these variables were back transformed and relationships reported in terms of relative (rather than absolute) change on the original scale of measurement. The models based on relative change relationships were considered biologically plausible and more closely adhered to underlying statistical assumptions. Diagnostic residual plots (including residuals versus fitted values and Normal probability plots of the residuals) were used to check the adequacy of the fitted models.

Backward stepwise multiple linear regression (variables removed at p>0.1) was used to identify independent non-sleep variable predictors from amongst candidate variables that were identified in two ways: 1) based on published models for IMT [2729]; and 2) demonstrated significant (p<0.05) univariable associations with IMT within the cross-sectional study data. In addition, a ‘study group’ factor (‘included’ in RFM Sub-Group versus ‘not included’) was included to determine whether the same set of non-sleep variables were operating in the RFM sub-group. Collinear variables were identified by collinearity tests–variance inflation factor (VIF>10), condition index (>30) and variance proportion (>0.5)–and were removed based on weaker univariate associations with the dependent variable. Identified candidate variables were then entered into the backward stepwise regression and a base model established for each dependent variable (ln(CCA IMT) or ln(CFA IMT) base model). As the study group factor was not significant in these models, the same base models were used for analysis of both the Main Group and RFM Sub-Group.

SDB variables, AHI category and severe/non-severe OSA) were added to the base models individually to assess the effect of each SDB variable after adjusting for the base model. These models were also checked for collinearity, as above. The base-model-adjusted parameter estimate and its standard error (SE) are presented for each SDB variable along with the incremental change (SBD model-Base Model) in R2 (ΔR2) to determine whether the addition of the SDB variable to the base model improved overall model performance. An interaction term [SDB variable x study group] was added to test whether the base-model-adjusted SDB effect differed between those included in the RFM Sub-Group and those not included. If a significant SDB variable x study group] interaction was detected, the base-model-adjusted SDB parameter was also estimated in only the RFM Sub-Group.

RFM intervention study

Paired t tests were used to test for within participant change in log transformed IMT values over 12 months and results expressed as percentage change in IMT from baseline with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). For each variable in the cross-sectional study base models, the within participant change over 12 months was calculated as: Δvariable = (variable12month−variablebaseline). Spearman rank correlation was used to quantify the association between the change in ln(IMT) and each Δvariable.

Linear mixed effects (LME) models were used to examine the effect of CPAP use on ln(IMT) values over the 12 month RFM study, either as a continuous variable (average hours/day) or as a dichotomous variable (<4hrs/day vs > = 4hrs/day). In these models, subject was used as the group identifier. The ‘Visit’ (1 = baseline, 2 = 12 months) variable was fitted as both a random effect with unstructured covariance matrix and as a fixed effect. The covariates from the relevant base model were added, along with CPAP use and its interaction with Visit, as fixed effects. A significant (CPAPxVisit) interaction term was interpreted as evidence that CPAP use influenced the within participant change in ln(IMT) from baseline to 12 months. Diagnostic plots were used to assess the adequacy of the fitted models. They included scatter plots of standardized residuals by fitted values and Normal probablity plots of residuals and of estimated random effects to check the normality assumption for the within-subject errors and for the random effects.

Results

Cross-sectional study

Table 1 shows Main Group anthropometrics, Framingham Cardiovascular Risk values, polysomnography and ultrasound data. Additional anthropometrics, medical history, cholesterol and blood sugar levels can be found in S1 Table in S1 File. Overall, the Main Group has 55% males, with 82% having low-intermediate cardiovascular risk levels and a wide range of SDB, skewed towards the lower end of the AHI spectrum.

Table 1. Main group demographics and sleep disordered breathing status.

Demographics (A), cardiovascular risk status (B), IMT and SDB status (C) of the Main Group, presented as mean ± SD, median (IQR) or frequency, where appropriate, plus range. See text for abbreviations.

A
N Mean ± SD Range
Age (yrs) 296 57.9 ± 9.3 35–79
Height (cm) 295 167.5 ± 9.7 144.0–191.5
Weight (kg) 295 88.9 ± 20.9 41.6–186.3
BMI (kg/m2) 295 31.7 ± 6.9 17.1–64.5
Neck circumference (cm) 293 39.7 ± 4.5 30.0–56.5
Waist:hip ratio 293 0.94 ± 0.08 0.52–1.14
Systolic BP (mmHg) 294 128.4 ± 15.3 92–176
B
Framingham risk level: Male Female Total
Low 50 84 134 (48%)
Intermediate 56 37 93 (34%)
High 43 7 50 (18%)
C
N Median (IQR) Range
AHI (events/hr) 296 12.5 (4.4–24.3) 0.0–103.9
RDI (events/hr) 296 23.9 (14.1–41.1) 1.1–104.2
AI (events/hr) 296 27.5 (19.2–38.9) 5.9–100.5
ODI >3% (events/hr) 296 3.8 (0.9–8.8) 0.0–73
SpO2<90% (%TST) 296 0.4 (0–2.7) 0.0–98.2
Lowest SpO2 NREM (%) 296 89.0 (86.0–92.0) 53–96
Lowest SpO2 REM (%) 288 87.0 (81.0–91.0) 41–97
CCA IMT (mm) 268 0.56 (0.51–0.64) 0.37–1.01
CFA IMT (mm) 266 0.52 (0.46–0.58) 0.34–1.03

Table 2 shows the same data for the RFM Sub-Group which had a significantly higher proportion of males, increased body size metrics (height, weight, neck circumference and waist:hip ratio), decreased total cholesterol and HDL, and higher SDB metrics (AHI, RDI, ODI >3%, AI) than those not included in the RFM intervention study. Cardiovascular risk levels and IMTs were comparable between the two groups (See S2 and S3 Tables in S1 File).

Table 2. RFM sub-group demographics and sleep disordered breathing status.

Demographics (A), cardiovascular risk (B), IMT and SDB status (C) of the RF Minimisation Sub-Group, presented as mean ± SD, median (IQR) or frequency, where appropriate, plus range. See text for abbreviations.

A
N Mean ± SD Range
Age (yrs) 157 57.7 ± 9.8 35–79
Height (cm) 157 169.3 ± 10.1 144.0–191.5
Weight (kg) 157 92.4 ± 21.4 45.8–186.3
BMI (kg/m2) 157 32.2 ± 7.0 19.6–64.5
Neck circumference (cm) 157 40.7 ± 4.6 31.0–56.5
Waist:hip ratio 157 0.95 ± 0.09 0.89–0.96
Systolic BP (mmHg) 156 129.4 ± 14.2 92–172
B
Framingham risk level: Male Female Total
Low 33 37 70 (47%)
Intermediate 34 13 47 (32%)
High 28 4 32 (21%)
C
N Median (IQR) Range
AHI (events/hr) 157 14.7 (7.2–33.2) 0.0–103.9
RDI (events/hr) 157 30.7 (17.4–45.3) 1.4–104.2
AI (events/hr) 157 32.6 (21.3–43.5) 5.9–100.5
ODI >3% (events/hr) 157 4.4 (1.1–13.7) 0.0–73.0
SpO2<90% (%TST) 157 0.5 (0–3.4) 0.0–98.2
Lowest SpO2 NREM (%) 157 90.0 (85.5–92.0) 53–96
Lowest SpO2 REM (%) 153 87.0 (79.5–91.0) 41–95
Snores (events/hr) 155 470 (282–652) 26–1051
CCA IMT (mm) 157 0.56 (0.50–0.64) 0.37–1.01
CFA IMT (mm) 155 0.52 (0.46–0.60) 0.34–1.03

Significant rank correlations were observed between IMT values and a number of anthropometric, blood chemistry and polysomnography variables (Table 3). Age exhibited the strongest association with CCA IMT (Fig 2A, r = 0.50), while weight was most strongly associated with CFA IMT (Fig 2B, r = 0.32). Fig 2 shows the ln(IMT)-age relationship back-transformed to the original scale of measurement for both CCA (Fig 1A; R2 = 0.25) and CFA (Fig 1B; R2 = 0.07).

Table 3. Main group—Spearman rank correlations.

Spearman rank correlation (r) between each variable used in the models and IMT values for CCA and CFA. See text for abbreviations.

Variable CCA IMT CFA IMT
r p-value r p-value
Age 0.50 <0.001+ 0.29 <0.001+
BMI 0.04 0.50 0.26 <0.001+
Height 0.02 0.80 0.15 0.01+
Weight 0.02 0.70 0.32 <0.001+
Neck circumference 0.11 0.07 0.31 <0.001+
WHR 0.15 0.02+ 0.23 <0.001+
Total cholesterol -0.09 0.10 -0.03 0.70
HDL 0.01 0.80 -0.09 0.10
Total cholesterol:HDL -0.10 0.10 0.07 0.20
BSL fasting 0.14 0.02+ 0.05 0.50
Systolic BP 0.25 <0.001+ 0.21 0.001+
AHI 0.13 0.03+ 0.17 0.005+
RDI 0.15 0.02+ 0.17 0.005+
AI 0.15 0.01+ 0.18 0.004+
ODI >3% 0.11 0.06 0.11 0.070
SpO2<90% 0.16 0.01+ 0.10 0.10
Lowest SpO2 NREM (%) -0.183 0.003+ -0.153 0.013+
Lowest SpO2REM (%) -0.133 0.032+ -0.027 0.67

+ Indicates significant (p<0.05).

Fig 2. Main group IMT-age relationships.

Fig 2

Scatter plots of IMT versus age for CCA (A) and CFA (B). The back-transformed predicted values and 95% confidence bands from the linear regression of ln(IMT) on age are shown. R2 for the relationship is higher for the CCA than for the CFA, but both have wide predictive bands for IMT indicating significant non-age-related variability.

Base models—Main group

The following variables were entered into a backward stepwise multiple linear regression model of log transformed CCA IMT values: age, BMI, gender, ethnicity, systolic blood pressure, smoking history (combined current and/or past), cholesterol medication, hypertension medication, neck circumference, waist:hip ratio, total cholesterol:HDL ratio, fasting blood sugar level and study group. The final model for ln(CCA IMT) (Table 4A) explained 27% of the variance. Diagnostic plots of the residuals showed good agreement with error assumptions underlying the model. Age was the most significant predictor demonstrating a 9.3% (95%CI 7.0–11.7%, p<0.001) increase in CCA IMT per decade of age. Other significant predictors were systolic BP predicting 0.20% (95%CI 0.04–0.40%, p = 0.016) increase per mmHg and waist:hip ratio predicting 27% (95%CI 1.2–59%, p = 0.040) increase in CCA IMT per au. Study group was not a significant predictor and was excluded prior to the final model.

Table 4. Main group IMT base models.

The base models for log transformed CCA IMT (A) and CFA IMT (B) showing the independent, non-SDB predictor variables for the Main Group.

Variable B S.E. p-value
A ln(CCA IMT)
(Constant) -1.508 0.134 <0.001
Age (per decade) 0.089 0.011 <0.001
Waist:hip ratio (au) 0.237 0.115 0.040
Systolic BP (mmHg) 0.002 0.001 0.016
R2 = 0.270
B ln(CFA IMT)
(Constant) -1.378 0.093 <0.001
Age (per decade) 0.067 0.011 <0.001
Weight (kg) 0.003 0.001 <0.001
Total cholesterol:HDL ratio 0.019 0.009 0.037
R2 = 0.206

B = unstandardized beta coefficient; S.E. = standard error of B.

The following variables were entered into the backward stepwise multiple linear regression model of log transformed CFA IMT values: age, weight, gender, ethnicity, systolic blood pressure, smoking history, cholesterol medication, hypertension medication, total cholesterol:HDL ratio and study group. The final model (Table 4B) explained 21% of the variance. Diagnostic plots of the residuals showed good agreement with error assumptions underlying the model. Age was the most significant predictor demonstrating a 6.9% (95%CI 4.6–9.3%, p<0.001) increase in CFA IMT per decade of age. Other significant predictors were weight, predicting 0.30% (95%CI 0.10–0.50%, p<0.001) increase in CFA IMT per kg, and total cholesterol:HDL ratio predicting 1.9% (95%CI 0.14–3.7%, p = 0.037) increase per au. Study group was not a significant predictor and was excluded prior to the final model.

SDB variable models—Main group

Log transformed SDB variables (see Table 1C plus AHI Category and severe/non-severe OSA) were added individually to the base models for the log transformed IMT values. None of these SDB variables emerged as significant predictors independent of the base models (all p>0.05) for either ln(CCA IMT) (Table 5A) or ln(CFA IMT) (Table 5B). Their addition to the base models resulted in negligible improvement in the proportion of observed variance explained (lnCCA IMT: ΔR2 from -0.011–0.003; lnCFA IMT: ΔR2 from -0.063–0.01).

Table 5. Main group SDB variable models for IMT.

Results of adding each SDB variable individually to the base model for log transformed IMT values, i.e. base model + SDB variable, for the CCA IMT (A) and CFA IMT (B) in the Main Group. See text for abbreviations.

Variable B* S.E.* p-value* ΔR2
A ln(CCA IMT)
ln(AHI) -0.004 0.009 0.70 0.001
ln(RDI) <0.001 0.013 >0.90 0.0
ln(AI) -0.003 0.02 0.90 0.0
ln(ODI >3%) 0.001 0.009 0.90 0.0
ln(SpO2<90%) 0.002 0.01 0.90 0.0
ln (Lowest SpO2 NREM) (%) 0.008 0.127 0.95 0.0
ln (Lowest SpO2 REM) (%) -0.027 0.078 0.73 -0.011
AHI category - - 0.80 0.003
AHI >30 events/hr -0.013 0.025 0.6 0.001
B ln(CFA IMT)
ln(AHI) 0.012 0.01 0.2 0.005
ln(RDI) 0.024 0.014 0.09 0.009
ln(AI) 0.038 0.021 0.07 0.01
ln(ODI >3%) 0.002 0.01 0.8 0.0
ln(SpO2<90%) -0.007 0.01 0.5 0.001
ln (Lowest SpO2 NREM) (%) -0.059 0.147 0.689 -0.063
ln (Lowest SpO2 REM) (%) -0.029 0.087 0.736 -0.056
AHI category - - 0.5 0.007
AHI >30 events/hr 0.038 0.026 0.1 0.007

B* = unstandardized beta coefficient adjusted for base model; S.E.* = standard error of B*; ΔR2 is the incremental change in R2 after addition of the SDB variable to the Base Model calculated as (SDB model R2- Base Model R2).

Base models—RFM sub-group

The study group variable (‘included’ in RFM Sub-Group versus ‘not included’) was not significant for any of the cross-sectional base models. Consequently, the base models for the RFM Sub-Group were constructed using the same variables as emerged in the Main Group base model results shown above.

For ln(CCA IMT), the base model explained 27% of the variance. Age and systolic BP were significant predictors with age demonstrating a 9.2% (95%CI 6.2–12.2%, p<0.001) increase in CCA IMT per decade of age and systolic BP predicting 0.20% (95%CI 0.00–0.40%, p = 0.033) increase in CCA IMT per mmHg (See S4A Table in S1 File). For ln(CFA IMT), the base model explained 19% of the variance. Age and weight were significant predictors with age demonstrating a 7.5% (95%CI 4.5–10.8%, p<0.001) increase in CFA IMT per decade of age and weight predicting 0.30% (95%CI 0.10–0.50%, p<0.001) increase in CFA IMT per kg (See S4B Table in S1 File).

SDB variable models—RFM sub-group

None of the interactions between study group and each SDB variable [SDB variable x study group] adjusted for the base model interactions had a significant effect on log transformed CCA IMT values in the Main Group data. Consequently no SDB variable testing was undertaken in the RFM Sub-Group (See S5A Table in S1 File).

For log transformed CFA IMT values, the following significant interactions were detected in the Main Group after adjusting for the base model: ln(AHI) x study group (p = 0.01), ln(RDI) x study group (p = 0.03), ln(ODI >3%) x study group (p = 0.02), ln(SpO2<90%) x study group (p = 0.01) and ln (Lowest SpO2 REM)*study group (p = 0.04). This indicated that the relationship between ln(CFA IMT) and these SDB variables required separate investigation in the RFM Sub-Group (See S5B Table in S1 File). When added individually to the base model in the RFM Sub-Group, only ln(AHI) ln(RDI) and ln(AI) had a significant effect on ln(CFA IMT) (See S6 Table in S1 File). For each 2-fold increase in AHI there was a predicted 2.4% (95%CI 0.5%-4.4%, p = 0.01) increase in CFA IMT, and for each 2-fold increase in RDI there was a predicted 4.0% (95%CI 1.0%-7.2%, p = 0.009) increase in CFA IMT after adjusting for the base model.

RFM intervention study

For the RFM sub group (n = 137) the mean AHI value after titration was 1.7 ± 2.1 events/hr.

Participants used CPAP for 5.0 ± 2.2 hrs/night (mean ± SD), with 74% of the group having CPAP compliance of ≥ 4 hrs/night across the 12-month intervention.

CCA IMT

After 12 months on study, there was a non-significant overall 0.8% (95%CI -1.4%, 3.1%, p = 0.476) increase in CCA IMT within participants from baseline. The size of the change was associated with weight change (r = 0.21, p = 0.016): CCA IMT decreased by 3.8% (95%CI 0.1–7.2%, p = 0.048) in those who lost weight and increased by 3.3% (95%CI 0.5–6.1%, p = 0.021) in those who did not. Linear mixed effects models of ln(CCA IMT) demonstrated this effect was essentially unchanged after correcting for the fixed baseline effects (age, waist: hip ratio and systolic BP) and that there was no evidence of a CPAP effect on the within partipant change in ln(CCA IMT) (interaction p = 0.512 between Visit and CPAP use); Fig 3A.

Fig 3. RFM sub-group—Effect of CPAP use on ln(CCA IMT) and on ln(CFA IMT) by weight loss status.

Fig 3

Mean with 95%CIs showing the within participant change in ln(CCA IMT) and in ln(CFA IMT) in the RFM Sub-Group during the 12-month RFM intervention by weight loss status and CPAP use. The ln(CFA IMT) depended on both weight loss and CPAP use (p = 0.020) with those who lost weight and also used CPAP > = 4hrs/day demonstrating a 12.9% (95%CI 6.8, 18.7%, p = 0.001) reduction in CFA IMT from baseline compared to no significant change in those who gained/maintained weight or used CPAP <4hours/day.

CFA IMT

After 12 months on study, there was a significant 3.5% (95%CI 0.8, 6.2%, p = 0.013) overall reduction in CFA IMT within participants from baseline. The linear mixed effects model of ln(CFA IMT) adjusted for the fixed baseline effects (age, weight and total cholesterol:HDL ratio) demonstrated a 2.9% (95%CI 0.3, 5.5%, p = 0.028) adjusted reduction in CFA IMT. There was no evidence of a CPAP effect on the within partipant change in ln(CFA IMT) (interaction p = 0.464 between Visit and CPAP use). There was, however, significant rank correlation between Δln(CFA IMT) and Δweight (r = 0.25; p = 0.004). When weight loss status and its 2 and 3-way interactions with Visit and CPAP use were added as fixed effects to the LME model for ln(CFA IMT), a significant 3-way interaction was detected (p = 0.020) indicating that the change in ln(CFA IMT) depended on the joint effects of weight loss status and CPAP use. In particular, there was a 12.9% (95%CI 6.8, 18.7%, p = 0.001) reduction in CFA IMT from baseline in those who both lost weight and used CPAP > = 4hours/day, but no significant changes in CFA IMT were observed in those who gained/maintained weight or used CPAP <4hours/day (Fig 3B).

Discussion

In a non-diabetic, sleep clinic cohort, aged >35 yrs, carotid and femoral artery IMT values were positively associated with the participant’s age. Statistical models incorporating a range of non-sleep and SDB variables explained at most 27% of the variance in CCA IMT and 21% of the variance in CFA IMT, leaving the majority of the between individual differences unexplained. Non-sleep related predictive factors for CCA and CFA IMT were broadly in alignment with those identified by large population studies [2731]. Smoking history, however, did not emerge as a signfiicant predictive factor for CCA and CFA IMT, this is probably because there were very few current (most at risk) smokers (n = 11) in the cohort.

We did not identify any impacts of SDB severity on CCA IMT values. However, in a sub-group with a wide range of SDB severity, RDI and AHI emerged as predictive variables for CFA IMT: a 2-fold increase in RDI predicting a 4.0% increase in CFA IMT, and a 2-fold increase in AHI predicting a 2.4% increase.

When sub-group individuals were stabilised on medical therapy, monitored and given CPAP for 12 months, CCA IMT increased within participant by a nonsignificant 0.8% in accordance with age. In contrast, CFA IMT decreased within participant by on average 3.5%. This reduction was related to both weight loss and CPAP use with those who lost weight and also used CPAP > = 4hrs/day demonstrating a reduction in CFA IMT from baseline.

Study cohort characteristics

In interpreting the results of the present study, it is important to understand the characteristics of the study cohort. This is not a randomised community-recruited population-based study. Rather, we targeted a specific Main Group (i.e. patients referred to a sleep clinic for assessment of SDB) and then screened for and eliminated diabetes as a RF. Consequently, our study group is also not a randomised sleep clinic population sample. The aim was to test for associations between specific SDB metrics and specific macro-vascular characteristics (IMT) in an environment where the influence of known cardio-vascular disease RFs was minimised. The rationale for this approach assumed that SDB influences were likely to be small compared with well-known systemic RFs, such as diabetes and smoking, and therefore, would be more likely to be detected in the absence of these major confounders. A number of previously published studies that have attempted to quantify associations between carotid IMT and SDB have highlighted this limitation [11, 32, 33].

In the Main Group not only was diabetes eliminated but ~40% of participants were on current treatment for hypertension and/or hypercholesterolaemia. Blood lipid and sugar levels were centred on normal levels for the group, but with a range of individual values (See S1C Table in S1 File). Framingham Cardiovascular Risk levels were relatively evenly distributed between low and intermediate/high, tended to be higher in males, and were similar to those reported for population studies across this age range [34, 35]. Sleep disordered breathing varied across the severity spectrum but was skewed to lower values, with only ~40% being determined to have moderate/severe OSA (AHI ≥ 15 events/hr).

It is also important to understand the nature of the RFM Sub-Group, in which an association between SDB and femoral artery IMT was detected. The RFM Sub-Group had a similar Framingham Cardiovascular Risk profile to the Main Group, but a greater proportion were male, and so had corresponding changes in body size measures (taller, weighed more, larger neck circumference). Overall SDB was more severe in the RFM Sub-Group with ~51% considered to have moderate/severe OSA. Thus, the OSA distribution of the Main Group skewed towards normal-mild, while the RFM Sub-Group, by design, had a more even distribution.

CCA IMT

CCA IMT is an established marker for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk [9, 10]. It has strong associations with established cardiovascular RFs including age, gender, BMI, lipid profile, diabetes, smoking and ethnicity [28, 29, 36], and these RFs have been variably used in regression modelling to predict CCA IMT in healthy and cardiovascular disease populations [27, 28]. OSA has been found to be independently associated with CCA IMT [32, 3739] in sleep clinic cohorts, with a recent meta-analysis finding a moderate correlation (r = 0.389) between AHI and CCA IMT [11]. However, differences in the degree of heterogeneity, small sample sizes, as well as differences in screening procedures and analysis techniques, create a degree of uncertainty as to the generalisability of these results.

Values for CCA IMT in the present study were positively associated with age and fell in the reported population normal range for age [27, 40]. Consequently, our non-diabetic sleep clinic-recruited cohort values for CCA IMT do not appear to vary systematically from what would be expected for a wider community age-matched group. Of the range of potential predictive variables tested in our multiple linear regression base models, age was the strongest independent predictor for ln(CCA IMT) along with minor contributions from systolic blood pressure and a body size measure (waist-hip ratio). This model, however, only explained ~27% of the total variance, leaving the majority of the difference between individual subject values unexplained.

When SDB variables were added to our base models there was either no or minimal improvement in the amount of variance explained and no SDB variable emerged as a significant independent predictor. Consequently, in this group, with a range of cardiovascular risk and where the distribution of SDB severity was skewed to lower values, we could not detect a role in predicting CCA IMT values for any SDB severity metric. This result also applied to the RFM Sub-Group with its greater relative proportion of more severe SDB. Interestingly, CCA IMT demonstrated a nonsignificant 0.8% overall mean increase within the Sub Group during the 12 month intervention in keeping with the predicted 0.9% age effect detected in the Main Group base model (see Table 4A). Linear mixed effects models of ln(CCA IMT) adjusted for the base model variables detected a significant difference between the 12 month 3.8% mean reduction in CCA IMT observed in those who lost weight compared to the 3.3% mean increase in those who gained weight. No significant association with CPAP use was seen.

The rank correlations between CCA IMT and SDB variables observed in the cross-sectional study are consistent with reports in the literature, but our rank correlation with AHI is lower than that reported elsewhere [11, 32]. We were unable to detect an independent association between SDB and ln(CCA IMT) using multiple regression analysis. This finding contrasts with reports in the literature of a significant independent association between CCA IMT and AHI values [32, 38]. There were, however, several key differences between these studies and ours. Suzuki et al. [38] studied a sleep clinic cohort, without excluding diabetes, with more severe SDB and higher IMT values, while Drager et al. [32] studied a small, highly selected group, excluding most other RFs, including age. The low IMT values in the present study–CCA IMT median (IQR): 0.56 (0.51–0.64) mm, i.e. very few IMT’s in the abnormal range–may have contributed to the weaker association seen with AHI compared to others. This may in turn have influenced our ability to find an independent association in multivariable models. Our results, however, were broadly in alignment with Kim et al. [20] who studied a similarly sized group with medically controlled RFs. Their findings of no significant difference in CCA IMT between participants with OSA and controls and no effect of CPAP on CCA IMT after 4 months are consistent with the present study. By excluding diabetes and controlling other RFs we may have limited the possibility for interactions between SDB and these other RFs that have previously been reported to have additive effects on IMT [33].

CFA IMT

CFA IMT has been studied much less than CCA IMT, but similar associations with cardiovascular RFs have been found [13]. Indeed, emerging evidence suggests that CFA IMT may actually be a stronger predictor of coronary artery disease [15] and a more sensitive measure of overall cardiovascular risk [12]. To date, no other studies have examined relationships between SDB and CFA IMT.

Values for CFA IMT in the present study were positively associated with age, but not as strongly as for CCA IMT, and were broadly aligned with the limited population normal range for age available in the literature [41, 42] and did not differ between the Main and RFM Sub-Groups (Table 4). In contrast to CCA IMT, CFA IMT demonstrated rank correlations of approximately 0.3 with body size metrics, especially weight and neck circumference, and weaker positive associations with systolic blood pressure and all SDB variables, except those for hypoxia (Table 2). These findings suggest that age and body size are the main univariable associative factors for CFA IMT operating in this data set, and, in comparison, the rank correlations with SDB variables are weaker and less certain.

In the Main Group multiple linear regression analysis, age and weight were identified as the strongest independent predictors for ln(CFA IMT), with total cholesterol:HDL ratio also emerging as significant predictor. However, the model itself only explained 21% of the total variance leaving the majority of the variance unexplained. When SDB variables were added to the base model there was either no or minimal improvement in the amount of variance explained and no SDB variable emerged as a significant independent predictor. Consequently, in this group, with a range of cardiovascular risk and where the distribution of SDB severity was skewed to lower values, we could not detect a role for any SDB severity metric in predicting CFA IMT values.

There were, however, significant interactions between several SDB variables and study group, i.e. the effect of SDB variables on ln(CFA IMT) adjusted for the base model differed between those included in the RFM Sub-Group and those not included. Both ln(AHI) and ln(RDI) emerged as significant independent predictors of ln(CFA IMT), explaining an additional 3–4% of the variance when added to the base model in the RFM Sub-Group. This differs from the Main Group outcome and suggests a potential small role for SDB severity as a predictor of CFA IMT in a Sub-Group enriched with more severe SDB.

There are no previous studies examining CFA IMT in OSA. There are, however, a number of publications that support differing biology and predictors [12, 13, 15] for CFA versus CCA IMT. In the present study different predictors were identified in the Main Group and RFM Sub-Group. Given that the RFM Sub-Group contained a greater proportion of males with more severe SDB, one potential interpretation is that this finding reflects more systemic impacts of SDB operating in the RFM Sub-Group. We speculate that the femoral vascular bed may be more sensitive than the carotid vasculature to the cardiovascular stressors seen during sleeping with OSA (intermittent hypoxia and increased nocturnal sympathetic activity).

CFA IMT decreased significantly within participants by 3.5% (95%CI 0.8, 6.2%, p = 0.013) with 12 months of RFM intervention. Considering that the CFA IMT-age relationship for this group predicted a 0.7% increase, the observed decrease is additional to this expected increase. Linear mixed effects modelling of ln(CFA IMT) adjusted for the base model variables detected a significant association between the 12 month change observed in ln(CFA IMT) and the joint effects of CPAP use and within patient weight change: those who lost weight and also used CPAP > = 4hrs/day reduced CFA IMT from baseline compared to no significant change in those who gained weight or used CPAP <4hours/day. These findings suggest that treatment of SDB with CPAP, when combined with weight loss and medical stabilisation of vascular RF, may help contribute to reducing CFA IMT thickening, at least over the first year post diagnosis. Further studies will be require to determine if this effect is maintained over longer time frames.

Strengths & limitations

This study has a number of strengths and limitations. The small study size limits statistical power to detect relatively small changes in IMT against a background of remaining more influential RFs. The established non-SDB RFs were only able to explain 20–27% of the variance in IMT for the group. This is comparable with the results of larger population studies that have found similar RFs explaining 29% of the variance in CCA IMT [28, 43]. The fact that we were only able to detect small independent associations between SDB variables and CFA IMT in our OSA-enriched RFM Sub-Group suggests that detecting such associations in an overall sleep clinic population would require larger numbers. However, the Main Group size compares favourably with other studies examining associations between SDB and IMT and the RFM Sub-Group is one of the largest studies, with a long follow-up period, examining the association between changes in IMT and RFM intervention (including CPAP treatment).

The composition of the study group: 1) eliminated a major RF, diabetes; 2) controlled for some, i.e. treatment of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia; and 3) allowed a range of other RFs, e.g. age and body size. This was an attempt to avoid trying to find a potentially small SDB effect in the presence of more influential confounders typical of larger groups, while simultaneously avoiding very small study groups produced by eliminating all known RFs. Our efforts may, however, have succeeded in dampening interaction effects between classic RFs and SDB by monitoring and controlling them carefully. This may have resulted in IMT values for the study group that essentially fell within the normal range predicted from larger population studies. This increased the difficulty to detecting independent associations with SDB and was also an important limitation for the RF Minimisation Intervention. A “floor effect” may have been in play, whereby IMT levels could not be further reduced. Nevertheless, we were able to detect a significant overall decrease in CFA IMT across the intervention period, while CCA IMT tended to increase in line with the 1-year increase in age.

Examination of the femoral artery was an important strength of the study. The stronger associations found between SDB and CFA versus CCA IMT suggest that the CFA IMT may be a better marker of cardiovascular disease than the CCA IMT. Our multivariable models support a role for SDB as a small, but significant, independent predictor of CFA IMT. Given the emerging evidence regarding the differences in biology between the carotid and femoral arteries, the CFA IMT may also be a useful marker of SDB-associated cardiovascular risk.

Summary

Overall findings from the cross-sectional study identified classic vascular RFs for IMT. Although we found univariable associations for metrics of SDB severity, we did not identify any independent associations in the Main Group. In the more severely SDB affected RF Minimisation Sub-Group, both AHI and RDI emerged as independent predictors of CFA IMT. A 12-month RF Minimisation Intervention reduced CFA IMT by 12.6% in those who both lost weight and used CPAP > = 4hours/day.

Conclusion

In this study of non-diabetic patients presenting to a sleep clinic, total variance in carotid and femoral artery IMT was only modestly explained by a combination of anthropometric characteristics (predominantly age) and known clinical RFs. There was no detectable contribution from SDB metrics, except for a small contribution to CFA IMT variance attributable to measures of SDB severity (AHI/RDI). Intervening with 12 months of RF minimisation including CPAP did not alter CCA IMT but reduced CFA IMT specifically in those who both lost weight and used CPAP > = 4hours/day.

We conclude that once classical vascular disease RFs are excluded or controlled, SDB may play a minor role in increasing risk for femoral, but not carotid, artery IMT values in sleep clinic patients. This effect, however, is minimal when compared with the influence of known cardiovascular RFs and is even less substantial when compared with the levels of unexplained variance revealed by our modelling. However, this is the first study to suggest a potential linkage between femoral artery IMT levels and SDB severity.

Supporting information

S1 File

(DOCX)

S1 Protocol

(PDF)

S2 Protocol

(PDF)

S1 Checklist. TREND statement checklist.

(PDF)

S1 Dataset. IMT data files.

(ZIP)

S2 Dataset. SPSS data files.

(ZIP)

S1 Codes. SPSS syntax codes.

(ZIP)

Acknowledgments

We thank Tracey Burns, Anne Drury, Warde Elias, Allison Mitchell, Ayey Susan Madut, Victoria Sissanes, Meredith Wickens, and Heather Wood for assistance with the study.

Data Availability

The study’s minimal underlying data set has been uploaded as Supporting information.(compressed files).

Funding Statement

This study was funded by two National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) grants (632597; APP1024440), www.nhmrc.gov.au. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Ayappa I, Rapoport DM. The upper airway in sleep: physiology of the pharynx. Sleep Med Rev. 2003;7(1):9–33. doi: 10.1053/smrv.2002.0238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Levy P, Kohler M, McNicholas WT, Barbe F, McEvoy RD, Somers VK, et al. Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;1:15015. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Malhotra A, Orr JE, Owens RL. On the cutting edge of obstructive sleep apnoea: where next? Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3(5):397–403. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00051-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Drager LF, McEvoy RD, Barbe F, Lorenzi G, Redline S, Collab I-AII. Sleep Apnea and Cardiovascular Disease: Lessons From Recent Trials and Need for Team Science. Circulation. 2017;136(19):1840–50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Marshall NS, Wong KKH, Cullen SRJ, Knuiman MW, Grunstein RR. Sleep Apnea and 20-Year Follow-Up for All-Cause Mortality, Stroke, and Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the Busselton Health Study Cohort. J Clin Sleep Med. 2014;10(4):355–62. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.3600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Redline S, Yenokyan G, Gottlieb DJ, Shahar E, O’Connor GT, Resnick HE, et al. Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea and Incident Stroke The Sleep Heart Health Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(2):269–77. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200911-1746OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ryan S. Mechanisms of cardiovascular disease in obstructive sleep apnoea. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:S4201–S11. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.08.56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McEvoy RD, Antic NA, Heeley E, Luo Y, Ou Q, Zhang X, et al. CPAP for Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(10):919–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nezu T, Hosomi N, Aoki S, Matsumoto M. Carotid Intima-Media Thickness for Atherosclerosis. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2016;23(1):18–31. doi: 10.5551/jat.31989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Polak JF, O’Leary DH. Carotid Intima-Media Thickness as Surrogate for and Predictor of CVD. Glob Heart. 2016;11(3):295–312. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2016.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhou M, Guo B, Wang Y, Yan D, Lin C, Shi Z. The Association Between Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Angiology. 2017;68(7):575–83. doi: 10.1177/0003319716665985 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Berni A, Giuliani A, Tartaglia F, Tromba L, Sgueglia M, Blasi S, et al. Effect of vascular risk factors on increase in carotid and femoral intima-media thickness. Identification of a risk scale. Atherosclerosis. 2011;216(1):109–14. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.01.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lucatelli P, Fagnani C, Tarnoki AD, Tarnoki DL, Stazi MA, Salemi M, et al. Femoral Artery Ultrasound Examination: A New Role in Predicting Cardiovascular Risk. Angiology. 2017;68(3):257–65. doi: 10.1177/0003319716651777 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Salonen JT, Salonen R. Ultrasound B-Mode Imaging in Observational Studies of Atherosclerotic Progression. Circulation. 1993;87(3):56–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sosnowski C, Pasierski T, Janeczko-Sosnowska E, Szulczyk A, Dabrowski R, Wozniak J, et al. Femoral rather than carotid artery ultrasound imaging predicts extent and severity of coronary artery disease. Kardiol Pol. 2007;65(7):760–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hui DS, Shang Q, Ko FW, Ng SS, Szeto CC, Ngai J, et al. A prospective cohort study of the long-term effects of CPAP on carotid artery intima-media thickness in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Respir Res. 2012;13:22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Drager LF, Bortolotto LA, Figueiredo AC, Krieger EM, Lorenzi GF. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on early signs of atherosclerosis in obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176(7):706–12. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200703-500OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ng SS, Liu EK, Ma RC, Chan TO, To KW, Chan KK, et al. Effects of CPAP therapy on visceral fat thickness, carotid intima-media thickness and adipokines in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. Respirology. 2017;22(4):786–92. doi: 10.1111/resp.12963 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kostopoulos K, Alhanatis E, Pampoukas K, Georgiopoulos G, Zourla A, Panoutsopoulos A, et al. CPAP therapy induces favorable short-term changes in epicardial fat thickness and vascular and metabolic markers in apparently healthy subjects with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). Sleep Breath. 2016;20(2):483–93. doi: 10.1007/s11325-015-1236-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim J, Mohler ER 3rd, Keenan BT, Maislin D, Arnardottir ES, Gislason T, et al. Carotid Artery Wall Thickness in Obese and Nonobese Adults With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Before and Following Positive Airway Pressure Treatment. Sleep. 2017;40(9). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen LD, Lin L, Lin XJ, Ou YW, Wu Z, Ye YM, et al. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on carotid intima-media thickness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0184293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pignoli P, Tremoli E, Poli A, Oreste P, Paoletti R. Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging. Circulation. 1986;74(6):1399–406. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.74.6.1399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Touboul PJ, Hennerici MG, Meairs S, Adams H, Amarenco P, Bornstein N, et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004-2006-2011). An update on behalf of the advisory board of the 3rd, 4th and 5th watching the risk symposia, at the 13th, 15th and 20th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, Brussels, Belgium, 2006, and Hamburg, Germany, 2011. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;34(4):290–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.Iber C, Iber C. The AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events: rules, terminology and technical specifications: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; Westchester, IL; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Berry RB, Budhiraja R, Gottlieb DJ, Gozal D, Iber C, Kapur VK, et al. Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: update of the 2007 AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events. Deliberations of the Sleep Apnea Definitions Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012;8(5):597–619. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.2172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kushida CA, Chediak A, Berry RB, Brown LK, Gozal D, Iber C, et al. Clinical guidelines for the manual titration of positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2008;4(2):157–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Engelen L, Ferreira I, Stehouwer CD, Boutouyrie P, Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, et al. Reference intervals for common carotid intima-media thickness measured with echotracking: relation with risk factors. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(30):2368–2380. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tattersall MC, Gassett A, Korcarz CE, Gepner AD, Kaufman JD, Liu KJ, et al. Predictors of Carotid Thickness and Plaque Progression During a Decade The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Stroke. 2014;45(11):3257–62. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005669 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hao G, Wang X, Treiber FA, Davis H, Leverett S, Su S, et al. Growth of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Black and White Young Adults. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(12). doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Song PG, Xia W, Zhu YJ, Wang ML, Chang XL, Jin S, et al. Prevalence of carotid atherosclerosis and carotid plaque in Chinese adults: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2018;276:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sturlaugsdottir R, Aspelund T, Bjornsdottir G, Sigurdsson S, Thorsson B, Eiriksdottir G, et al. Prevalence and determinants of carotid plaque in the cross-sectional REFINE-Reykjavik study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e012457–e. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Drager LF, Bortolotto LA, Lorenzi MC, Figueiredo AC, Krieger EM, Lorenzi-Filho G. Early signs of atherosclerosis in obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172(5):613–8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200503-340OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Drager LF, Bortolotto LA, Krieger EM, Lorenzi-Filho G. Additive effects of obstructive sleep apnea and hypertension on early markers of carotid atherosclerosis. Hypertension. 2009;53(1):64–9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.119420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lee C, Yun HR, Joo YS, Lee S, Kim J, Nam KH, et al. Framingham risk score and risk of incident chronic kidney disease: A community-based prospective cohort study. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2019;38(1):49–59. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.18.0118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rissardo JP, Caprara ALF, Prado ALC, Leite MTB. Investigation of the cardiovascular risk profile in a south Brazilian city: surveys from 2012 to 2016. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2018;76(4):219–24. doi: 10.1590/0004-282x20180020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Peters SAE, Grobbee DE, Bots ML. Carotid intima-media thickness: a suitable alternative for cardiovascular risk as outcome? Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2011;18(2):167–74. doi: 10.1177/1741826710389400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Salepci B, Fidan A, Ketenci SC, Parmaksiz ET, Comert SS, Kiral N, et al. The effect of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and snoring severity to intima-media thickening of carotid artery. Sleep Breath. 2015;19(1):239–46. doi: 10.1007/s11325-014-1002-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Suzuki T, Nakano H, Maekawa J, Okamoto Y, Ohnishi Y, Yamauchi M, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea and carotid-artery intima-media thickness. Sleep. 2004;27(1):129–33. doi: 10.1093/sleep/27.1.129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Baguet JP, Hammer L, Levy P, Pierre H, Launois S, Mallion JM, et al. The severity of oxygen desaturation is predictive of carotid wall thickening and plaque occurrence. Chest. 2005;128(5):3407–12. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.5.3407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.van den Munckhof ICL, Jones H, Hopman MTE, de Graaf J, Nyakayiru J, van Dijk B, et al. Relation between age and carotid artery intima-medial thickness: a systematic review. Clin Cardiol. 2018;41(5):698–704. doi: 10.1002/clc.22934 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Depairon M, Tutta P, van Melle G, Hayoz D, Kappenberger L, Darioli R. Reference values of intima-medial thickness of carotid and femoral arteries in subjects aged 20 to 60 years and without cardiovascular risk factors. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2000;93(6):721–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Junyent M, Gilabert R, Nunez I, Corbella E, Cofan M, Zambon D, et al. Femoral ultrasound in the assessment of preclinical atherosclerosis. Distribution of intima-media thickness and frequency of atheroma plaques in a Spanish community cohort. Med Clin (Barc). 2008;131(15):566–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Polak JF, Pencina MJ, Meisner A, Pencina KM, Brown LS, Wolf PA, et al. Associations of carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) with risk factors and prevalent cardiovascular disease: comparison of mean common carotid artery IMT with maximum internal carotid artery IMT. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(12):1759–68. doi: 10.7863/jum.2010.29.12.1759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Miquel Vall-llosera Camps

15 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-02731

Predictors for carotid and femoral artery intima-media thickness in a non-diabetic sleep clinic cohort

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Amis,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

I would like to sincerely apologise for the delay you have incurred with your submission. It has been exceptionally difficult to secure reviewers to evaluate your study. We have now received three completed reviews; their comments are available below. Reviewer#1 and #3 have raised concerns about the statistical analysis in this study that need to be addressed in a revision.

Please revise the manuscript to address all the reviewer's comments in a point-by-point response in order to ensure it is meeting the journal's publication criteria. Please note that the revised manuscript will need to undergo further review, we thus cannot at this point anticipate the outcome of the evaluation process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 14 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Miquel Vall-llosera Camps

Senior Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

3. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript addresses an interesting topic. The collected data contain several features to be analysed. The research questions are appropriate and the employed statistical methods generally sound. Some comments follow.

1. Data are not fully available without restrictions. This is not in line with the journal's guidelines. More importantly, the reviewer does not have the chance to fully check the correctness of the methods. Please, upload the data and the code used to obtain the results.

2. Statistical tests and models are applied without a full investigation of the assumptions which must be fulfilled to ensure the reliability of the data. This is of course true for the test on linear correlations, but even more important when the regression model is employed. The authors must provide evidence that the Gauss-Markov assumptions are fulfilled. The analysis of residuals must be included.

3. The main outcome is skewed. A log transformation is applied. However, this is not justified and lead to a different empirical model, where the outcome has a different shape (i.e. a different variability). I am wondering why a regression model with skewed errors is overlooked. I see that "usually people act this way", but this does not mean that it is correct.

4. The performed longitudinal analysis is quite obscure to me. Do you have missing values? How do you account for repeated measurements and, accordingly, to dependence across obsevartions belonging to the same unit? You mention the linear mixed model, which is sound. Do you assumed Gaussian random effects? Is it a reasonable assumption for the data at hand? Wha about random coefficients? Again, please, check model's assumptions.

a. The R^2 are accompanied by a p-value. What does it refer to? Are you really comparing the intercept-only model with a model where the covariates are significant, and does obviuously improve the fit? In general, model fitting is rather poor, so there is a lot of unexplained heterogeneity.

Reviewer #2: This is an interesting article investigating the relationship between IMT of CCA/CFA and polysomnographic parameters. The results showed no significant association between severity of sleep apnea and carotid IMT. However, small association was found between femoral IMT and AHI/RDI. Otherwise, CPAP therapy for 12 months did not alter carotid IMT but reduced femoral IMT that was correlated with weight change instead of CPAP use.

Major comments

1.Some important variables such as mini-O2 and snoring can be associated with carotid IMT and need to be included for analyses.

2.The change of IMT in one year period could be very tiny. Thus persistent follow-up is necessary to clarify the long-term effect. Regarding CPAP outcome in terms of IMT, no progression is another explanation in comparison to progression of IMT in non-treatment group patients. This can be put into discussion or do subgroup analysis to clarify the CPAP effect.

3.The clinical meaning and significance of femoral IMT in contribution to OSA need discussion.

Reviewer #3: Review of the manuscript “Predictors for carotid and femoral artery intima-media thickness in a non diabetic sleep clinic cohort”

The study is interesting, however, there are some main concerns to be evaluated. Changing several variables in the 12-month sub-study can leave the analyzes confusing. BMI and OSA severity are collinear variables. Even when conducting collinearity tests, with a relatively small number of patients, we may have erroneous conclusions. Another fundamental point is the inclusion of smokers in this study. Smoking increases cardiovascular risk by 20 x, so it is difficult to analyze risk factors of such different importance in a study of approx. 200 participants. Please insert more information about smoking in the text

Authors must inform cpap adherence data, which is essential for data interpretation. The SAVE Study was cited, but the main criticism of the study is precisely the low adherence to cpap. Therefore, a reduction in cardiovascular risk with cpap cannot be assessed without this analysis. The adherence group (> 4 h of daily use) vs the non-adherence group (<4 h of daily use) should be evaluated

Minor comments:

Describe whether fixed or automatic cpap was used. Describe the AIH after titration

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Rodrigo Pinto Pedrosa

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0252569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252569.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


20 Apr 2021

Response to reviewers (as per uploaded response file)

RESPONSE TO REVIEWERS

Reviewer #1: “The manuscript addresses an interesting topic. The collected data contain several features to be analysed. The research questions are appropriate and the employed statistical methods generally sound. Some comments follow.”

1.1 Reviewer Question: “Data are not fully available without restrictions. This is not in line with the journal's guidelines. More importantly, the reviewer does not have the chance to fully check the correctness of the methods. Please, upload the data and the code used to obtain the results”.

Response: We have uploaded our data set as “Supplemental Material”.

1.2. Reviewer Question: “Statistical tests and models are applied without a full investigation of the assumptions which must be fulfilled to ensure the reliability of the data. This is of course true for the test on linear correlations, but even more important when the regression model is employed. The authors must provide evidence that the Gauss-Markov assumptions are fulfilled. The analysis of residuals must be included”.

Response: More details have been added to the Methods and Statistical Analysis section (see Revised Manuscript Pages 11-13, Lines 206-266). In particular it is noted there (see Revised Manuscript Page 11, Lines 208-9) and in the Results sections (see Revised Manuscript Table 3) that all reported correlations between continuous variables are Spearman rank correlations (not Pearson correlations which are sensitive to departures from normality). It is also now noted that (1) ‘Diagnostic residual plots (including residuals versus fitted values and Normal probability plots of the residuals) were used to check the adequacy of the fitted models’ in the multiple linear regression analyses and (2) for the linear mixed effects models ‘Diagnostic plots were used to assess the adequacy of the fitted models. They included scatter plots of standardized residuals by fitted values and Normal probablity plots of residuals and of estimated random effects to check the normality assumption for the within-subject errors and for the random effects.’

1.3. Reviewer Question: “The main outcome is skewed. A log transformation is applied. However, this is not justified and lead to a different empirical model, where the outcome has a different shape (i.e. a different variability). I am wondering why a regression model with skewed errors is overlooked. I see that "usually people act this way", but this does not mean that it is correct”.

Response: The Statistical Analysis section (see Revised Manuscript Page 11, Lines 216-218) now notes that the IMT and continuous SDB variables were skewed and were log transformed to approximate Normality and to stabilise the variance prior to analysis. Model parameter estimates for these variables were back transformed and relationships are now reported in terms of relative (rather than absolute) change on the original scale of measurement. The Figure 2 scatterplots of CCA IMT and CFA IMT versus age (see Revised Manuscript Figure 2) now show correct predicted values and 95% confidence bands for the IMT-age relationship based on the model for ln (IMT).

The linear regression models of ln (IMT) more closely adhered to underlying statistical assumptions when diagnostic plots of residuals for models of ln (IMT) were compared with those for IMT (see plots below). We preferred the classical linear regression models for ln (IMT) and believe that these models based on relative change relationships are biologically plausible and easily interpreted by clinicians. Many diagnostic plots were considered and, therefore, we have not included them in the manuscript.

Base models – some diagnostic residual plots for comparison

Ln(CCA IMT) (base model Rsq is 0.270) CCA IMT (base model Rsq is 0.264)

(a) Normal probability plots of residuals

(FIGURE IN ATTACHED RESPONSE FILE)

(b) Residuals versus Fitted values

(FIGURE IN ATTACHED RESPONSE FILE)

Ln (CFA IMT) (base model Rsq =0.206) CFA IMT (model Rsq = 0.191)

(a) Normal probability plots of residuals

(FIGURE IN ATTACHED RESPONSE FILE)

(b) Residuals versus Fitted values

(FIGURE IN ATTACHED RESPONSE FILE)

1.4. Reviewer Question: “The performed longitudinal analysis is quite obscure to me. Do you have missing values? How do you account for repeated measurements and, accordingly, to dependence across observations belonging to the same unit? You mention the linear mixed model, which is sound. Do you assume Gaussian random effects? Is it a reasonable assumption for the data at hand? What about random coefficients? Again, please, check model's assumptions.”

Response: Data for the longitudinal analysis were collected at only 2 time points, baseline (Visit 1), and 12 months (Visit 2). Patients in the RFM Sub-Group were included in the linear mixed effects model analyses only if they had CCA IMT values recorded at both times (n=137). Two of these patients did not have CFA IMT recorded at 12 months. The only other variables considered in the LME models which had missing data were Average CPAP use during the 12 month intervention (missing for 6/137 patients) and weight (not recorded at 12 months for 3/137 patients, one of whom was also missing CPAP).

As part of the response to this particular reviewer question our statistician has now revisted and extended the LME model analysis using IBM SPSS software (see also Reviewer Question 3.3 re CPAP compliance analysis). In these models of the log transformed IMT values, subject was used as the group identifier. The ‘Visit’ (1=baseline, 2=12 months) variable was fitted as both a random effect with unstructured covariance matrix and as a fixed effect. The covariates from the relevant base model were added along with average CPAP use and its interaction with Visit as fixed effects. A significant (CPAPxVisit) interaction term was interpreted as evidence that CPAP use influenced the within participant change in CFA ln(IMT) from baseline to 12 months. These details are now given in the Statistical Analysis section (see Revised Manuscript Page 13, Lines 255-266) along with mention of diagnostic plots used to check model assumptions as explained in 1.2 and 1.3 above.

These results are reported and discussed (see Revised Manuscript Pages 24-25, Lines 405-426; Page 32, Lines 566-574) while Figure 3 illustrates these findings.

1.5 Reviewer Question: “The R^2 are accompanied by a p-value. What does it refer to? Are you really comparing the intercept-only model with a model where the covariates are significant, and does obviuously improve the fit? In general, model fitting is rather poor, so there is a lot of unexplained heterogeneity.”

Response: The p-values accompanying R^2 values have been removed from Table 4, and supplementary Table S4. We agree that there is a lot of unexplained heterogeneity in our data set. Consequently, the relationships between IMT and both base and SDB variables, as detected in our statistical models, only partly explain (at most 21-27%) the overall IMT variance present in this relatively small cohort. We point this out in the Discussion (see Revised Manuscript Pages 27, 29 and 32).

Reviewer #2: “This is an interesting article investigating the relationship between IMT of CCA/CFA and polysomnographic parameters. The results showed no significant association between severity of sleep apnea and carotid IMT. However, small association was found between femoral IMT and AHI/RDI. Otherwise, CPAP therapy for 12 months did not alter carotid IMT but reduced femoral IMT that was correlated with weight change instead of CPAP use.”

2.1. Reviewer Question: “Some important variables such as mini-O2 and snoring can be associated with carotid IMT and need to be included for analyses.”

Response: We have included analyses for minimum O2 saturation for both the Main and RFM sub group (see Revised Manuscript Tables 1, 2, 3 and 5 and Supplemental Tables S3, 5 and S6). Snoring metrics were available for the RFM sub group only (see Revised Manuscript Table 2).

Neither of these variables were significant predictors for CCA or CFA IMT (see Revised Manuscript Table 5 and Supplemental Tables S6).

2.2 Reviewer Question: “The change of IMT in one year period could be very tiny. Thus persistent follow-up is necessary to clarify the long-term effect. Regarding CPAP outcome in terms of IMT, no progression is another explanation in comparison to progression of IMT in non-treatment group patients. This can be put into discussion or do subgroup analysis to clarify the CPAP effect.”

Response: As suggested we have done a sub-group analysis to clarify any CPAP effect. No progression for CCA IMT depended on whether the patient gained or lost weight across the 12 month RFM period (see Revised Manuscript Figure 3A). Consequently, the no progression for CCA IMT found the RFM sub group as a whole, is actually a reflection of reduced values for subjects with weight loss and increased values for those with weight gain. There was no interaction with CPAP use.

CFA IMT, however, decreased for the RFM sub-group across the 12 month intervention associated with a joint effect of weight loss and CPAP use (see Revised Manuscript Figure 3B).

2.3.Reviewer Question: “The clinical meaning and significance of femoral IMT in contribution to OSA need discussion.”

Response: This is the first time this finding has been reported as an observational finding. The clinical significance is unknown and is not informed by our study. We note that there are literature reports suggesting a closer relationship between CFA IMT and systemic cardiovascular health metrics than has been reported for CCA IMT where hemodynamic factors may play a bigger role (see Revised Manuscript Page 5, Lines 80-84.). Whether the linkage between CFA IMT and sleep disordered breathing severity, as detected in our study, represents a more “systemic” pathophysiological interaction remains speculative.

We have expanded our discussion of potential links between SDB and CFA IMT on Page 31, Lines 560-562 of the Revised Manuscript.

Reviewer #3: “Review of the manuscript “Predictors for carotid and femoral artery intima-media thickness in a non diabetic sleep clinic cohort”

3.1 Reviewer Question: “The study is interesting, however, there are some main concerns to be evaluated. Changing several variables in the 12-month sub-study can leave the analyzes confusing. BMI and OSA severity are collinear variables. Even when conducting collinearity tests, with a relatively small number of patients, we may have erroneous conclusions. “

Response: We acknowledge the limitations of our relatively small sample size (see Revised Manuscript Page 32, Lines 576-586) but our RFM sub-group study is one of the larger and longer follow up studies reported. We acknowledge the potential for interactions across the 12 month intervention and this was the reasoning behind using linear mixed effects modelling to analyse the data. Indeed, this approach did reveal an interaction between weight loss and CPAP compliance for change in CFA IMT.

3.2 Reviewer Question: “Another fundamental point is the inclusion of smokers in this study Smoking increases cardiovascular risk by 20 x, so it is difficult to analyze risk factors of such different importance in a study of approx. 200 participants. Please insert more information about smoking in the text.”

Response: We included smoking as a risk factor on the basis of the participant reporting current smoking or having ever smoked or were currently smoking versus having never smoked. We thus combined current smokers and past smokers into one group. We have clarified our smoking classification in the Revised Manuscript on Page 8, Line 141). We used this approach because we had insufficient current smokers (n=11) to analyse separately (114 past smokers, 166 non-smokers, 5 missing data). Since past smoking history (which also may have been minimal and years ago) is not as strong a cardiovascular risk factor compared with current smoking, we suspect that we did not identify smoking history as a predictor of CCA or CFA IMT because there were very few (n=11) current smokers in our (relatively small) cohort. This point has been noted in the Discussion (see Revised Manuscript Page 26, Lines 433-435).

3.3 Reviewer Question : “Authors must inform cpap adherence data, which is essential for data interpretation. The SAVE Study was cited, but the main criticism of the study is precisely the low adherence to cpap. Therefore, a reduction in cardiovascular risk with cpap cannot be assessed without this analysis. The adherence group (> 4 h of daily use) vs the non-adherence group (<4 h of daily use) should be evaluated”.

Response: In response to the reviewer’s comment suggesting reanalysing the data for CPAP compliance of > 4 hr daily versus < 4 hr daily, we have now specifically incorporated this factor into the linear mixed effects modelling for the RFM sub group. There were no effects on CCA IMT over the 12 month intervention, but we can report a 12.9% (95%CI 6.8, 18.7%, p=0.001) reduction in CFA IMT from baseline in those who both lost weight and used CPAP >=4hours/day, but not in those who gained/maintained weight or used CPAP <4hours/day ( see Revised Manuscript Figure 3). Thus, using CPAP for >4 hours daily was associated with a decrease in CFA IMT, but only those in participants who also lost weight across the 12 month intervention. This finding is discussed in the Revised Manucript on Page 32, Lines 566-574.

3.4 Reviewer Question: “Describe whether fixed or automatic cpap was used. Describe the AIH after titration.”

Response: CPAP was fixed. For the RFM sub group (n=137) the mean AHI value (± SD) after titration was 1.7 ± 2.1 events/hr. We have now reported these data in the revised manuscript (see Revised Manuscript Page 24, Line 392).

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-02731 - Response to Reviewers-12APR21.docx

Decision Letter 1

Giuseppe Andò

19 May 2021

Predictors for carotid and femoral artery intima-media thickness in a non-diabetic sleep clinic cohort

PONE-D-20-02731R1

Dear Dr. Amis,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Giuseppe Andò, M.D., Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Giuseppe Andò

24 May 2021

PONE-D-20-02731R1

Predictors for carotid and femoral artery intima-media thickness in a non-diabetic sleep clinic cohort

Dear Dr. Amis:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Giuseppe Andò

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File

    (DOCX)

    S1 Protocol

    (PDF)

    S2 Protocol

    (PDF)

    S1 Checklist. TREND statement checklist.

    (PDF)

    S1 Dataset. IMT data files.

    (ZIP)

    S2 Dataset. SPSS data files.

    (ZIP)

    S1 Codes. SPSS syntax codes.

    (ZIP)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-02731 - Response to Reviewers-12APR21.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The study’s minimal underlying data set has been uploaded as Supporting information.(compressed files).


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES